Aldosterone receptor blockers in the treatment of heart failure

Opinion statement Heart failure is associated with neurohormonal activation, including activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Plasma aldosterone levels are elevated in patients with heart failure in spite of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers because of angiotensin-independent stimuli for aldosterone production. In addition to its long recognized role in sodium retention, aldosterone has a number of other deleterious effects, including the increase in myocardial and vascular fibrosis and myocardial remodeling in patients with heart failure. Based on strong clinical trial data, low-dose aldosterone receptor blockers are recommended to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with severe chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction and in patients with heart failure associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction, and in patients already on standard therapy including ACE inhibitors (or angiotensin receptor blockers) and β blockers. In view of the potential for serious hyperkalemia with the use of aldosterone receptor blockers, it is essential to monitor serum potassium closely and to adjust the dose of aldosterone antagonists based on serum potassium levels. Close adherence to the dosing regimens used in the clinical trials (RALES [Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study] and EPHESUS [Eplerenone Post-AMI Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study]) is recommended. These agents should not be initiated in patients with severe renal insufficiency and closer monitoring is warranted in those with mild to moderate renal insufficiency or diabetes.     

Inhibition of RAAS—When is it too much?

Deactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is clearly beneficial in patients with recent myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure. Most of the experience with deactivation of the RAAS has been collected in placebo-controlled randomized trials of angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibition (ACEI). The hypothesis that angiotensin receptor blockade may be a better approach to deactivate the RAAS has not survived the test of time. Despite the extensive experience with ACEI and aldosterone receptor blockade in patients with recent myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure, several issues remain unanswered. These are addressed in this review.     

Treatments that improve outcome in the patient with heart failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or both after acute myocardial infarction

Patients with heart failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or both, after acute myocardial infarction have a poor prognosis. It is important to focus treatment on this high risk group to reduce the persistently high morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. As in chronic heart failure, there is now good evidence that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system, with the appropriate drugs, can reduce morbidity and mortality. In addition to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta blockers, the aldosterone blocker eplerenone has now been shown to be effective in reducing adverse outcomes.     

Aldosterone blockade in patients with chronic heart failure

Aldosterone blockade has been shown to be effective in reducing mortality in patients who have severe heart failure because of systolic left ventricular dysfunction (SLVD) and those who have heart failure and SLVD post-myocardial infarction. Aldosterone blockade also may be beneficial in patients who have New York Heart Association class II heart failure, asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, and heart failure with preserved or normal left ventricular function. Considering the beneficial effects of aldosterone blockade on improving nitric oxide availability, endothelial function, and atherosclerosis, it can also be postulated that an aldosterone blockade would add to the benefits of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in patients who have coronary artery disease. However, these hypotheses must be confirmed in well-designed, large-scale, prospectively randomized studies.     

Eplerenone: A Selective Aldosterone Blocker

Recent studies suggest that aldosterone may play a larger role than once appreciated in normal physiologic function and cardiovascular disease. Some of the adverse cardiovascular effects that have been described include cardiac and vascular fibrosis, vascular necrosis and inflammation, impaired endothelial function, reduced fibrinolysis, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), congestive heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmias. In light of these findings, the ability to block the actions of aldosterone has gained increased therapeutic importance. Eplerenone is a selective aldosterone receptor blocker that displays little interaction with androgen and progesterone receptors. Eplerenone has already been approved for the treatment of systemic hypertension and has been evaluated in numerous hypertension subgroups, including patients with low plasma renin activity; diabetes; LVH; uncontrolled blood pressure while receiving monotherapy with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin‐receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or beta‐blockers; and in black patients. Results of these trials indicate that eplerenone lowers blood pressure and reduces end‐organ damage. Further proof of the therapeutic importance of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade comes from the eplerenone post acute myocardial infarction survival and efficacy study (EPHESUS). In this large‐scale clinical outcome trial, eplerenone was shown to reduce total mortality by 15% as well as the combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality/cardiovascular hospitalization by 13% when administered at a mean of 7.3 days post myocardial infarction to patients with evidence of systolic left ventricular dysfunction and symptoms of heart failure. Eplerenone is well tolerated, with an adverse effect profile comparable to placebo. The advent of selective aldosterone blockers, such as eplerenone, should prove to be of great therapeutic value in hypertension control and prevention of cardiovascular disease and associated end‐organ damage.     

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade for cardiovascular disease prevention

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a significant role in pathophysiology of multiple disease states. RAAS blockade is beneficial in patients with hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, stroke, and diabetic renal disease. RAAS blockade with the combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has demonstrated conflicting results in recent clinical trials. This article reviews the latest evidence of isolated ACEI or ARB use, their combination, and the role of aldosterone blockers and direct renin inhibitors in patients at risk, and makes recommendations for their use in the prevention of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease.     

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism and cardiac remodeling in ischemic heart failure

Aldosterone production in the heart as well as aldosterone plasma levels are increased after myocardial infarction and in congestive heart failure, correlating with the severity of disease. Aldosterone promotes sodium and water retention, sympathoadrenergic activation, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiovascular fibrosis and hypertrophy. Even maximally recommended doses of ACE inhibitors do not completely prevent formation of aldosterone. The Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) and the Eplerenone Post acute myocardial infarction Heart failure Efficacy and SUrvival Study (EPHESUS) demonstrated that aldosterone receptor blockade markedly reduces mortality among patients with heart failure. This review summarizes recent clinical and experimental data on the effect of aldosterone antagonists on left ventricular remodeling and function in ischemic heart failure with special emphasis on potential underlying mechanisms. While reduction of excessive extracellular matrix turnover leading to decreased fibrosis appears to be the most important effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in heart failure, other mechanisms such as regression of hypertrophy, improvement of endothelial function, reduction of superoxide formation, and enhanced renal sodium excretion may contribute. Recent data showed that in rats with left ventricular dysfunction after extensive myocardial infarction, eplerenone on top of ACE inhibition more effectively improved cardiac remodeling and molecular alterations than ACE inhibition alone.     

Optimizing care of heart failure after acute MI with an aldosterone receptor antagonist

The presence of heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the setting of acute myocardial infarction is associated with poor prognosis. Aldosterone is an important downstream mediator of the reninangiotensin-aldosterone system that promotes myocardial collagen deposition, myocardial fibrosis, apoptosis, ventricular remodeling, and endothelial dysfunction. It may play an important role in the increased morbidity and mortality and the development and progression of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Extending the findings from the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) in patients with chronic heart failure, the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) demonstrated that the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone offered a significant survival benefit, attenuation of progression of heart failure, and prevention of sudden cardiac death when used in addition to optimal medical therapy. The current evidence-based guidelines now suggest that aldosterone blockade should be an integral component of heart failure therapy to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.     

Combining neuroendocrine inhibitors in heart failure: reflections on safety and efficacy

Neuroendocrine activation in heart failure has become the major target of pharmacotherapy for this growing epidemic. Agents targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems have shown cardiovascular and survival benefits in clinical trials. Beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors remain the mainstream initial therapy. The benefits of aldosterone antagonists have been demonstrated in advanced heart failure (spironolactone) and after myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure (eplerenone). Emerging clinical evidence demonstrated that angiotensin receptor blockers may be a reasonable alternative to ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure (candesartan) and following myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction (valsartan). Angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan) also provided incremental benefits when added to ACE inhibitors in chronic heart failure. Thus, combining neuroendocrine inhibitors in heart failure appears both biologically plausible and evidence-based. However, this approach raised concerns about side effects, such as hypotension, renal insufficiency, hyperkalemia, and others. Close follow-up and implementation of evidence-based medicine (ie, using agents and doses proven beneficial in clinical trials) should therefore be undertaken when combining neuroendocrine inhibitors.     

Effect of MR Blockade on Collagen Formation and Cardiovascular Disease with a Specific Emphasis on Heart Failure

Collagen is the major extracellular matrix protein in the heart and represents a crucial target for anti-remodeling and cardioprotective therapy. Collagen quantity and quality have been shown to be regulated under various physiological and pathologic conditions. Excessive deposition of collagen, leading to cardiac fibrosis, is a major determinant of cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmogenecity associated with sudden death. Serological markers of collagen turnover were proven as a noninvasive reliable tool for monitoring from a distance cardiac tissue repair and fibrosis, both in experimental and clinical conditions. Some markers of collagen synthesis and degradation were shown to have a prognostic significance in myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, and were reported as independent predictors of mortality. Aldosterone represents the end-product of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system and may play a role in cardiac collagen deposition independent of its effect on blood pressure. Production of aldosterone is mainly regulated by angiotensin II and is activated in the failing human ventricle in proportion to heart failure severity. Circulating or locally produced aldosterone stimulates fibrillar collagen accumulation in the heart directly via mineralocorticoid receptors or, indirectly, modifying angiotensine II receptors number and/or function. The use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists counters collagen deposition, even when used on top of classical RAAS inhibitors, such as ACE inhibitors and angiotensine II receptor blockers. There is now accumulating evidence from experimental and clinical studies showing antifibrotic and cardioprotective effect for aldosterone antagonists, spironolactone and eplerenone. In chronic heart failure and post myocardial infarction patients, aldosterone receptor blockade benefit was associated with decreased serum levels of collagen synthesis marker PIIINP (procollagen type III amino-terminal peptide), without affecting collagen degradation.Understanding various autocrine/paracrine mechanisms involved in extracellular matrix remodeling in heart failure represents a major challenge, essential for developing new cardioreparative and cardioprotective strategies.     

Cardiomyocyte mineralocorticoid receptor function post myocardial infarction

Clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blockade improves outcome in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction; however, the underlying mechanisms as well as the cell-specific functional role of MR activation are still under investigation. Extrarenal effects of MR blockade on cardiovascular extracellular matrix turnover and oxidative stress, on myocardial structural and electrical remodeling, and on sympathoadrenergic stimulation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and macrophage polarization appear to be important mechanisms. Recent scientific advances, involving mice with cardiomyocyte-restricted inactivation of the MR gene suggest that the clinical benefits of MR blocking therapy in myocardial infarction and heart failure are mediated largely via cardiomyocyte-dependent mechanisms, and they provide strong evidence that more favorable effects on cardiac dysfunction and failure can be achieved by early initiation of MR blockade postinfarction.     

Hospital protocols and evidence-based therapies: the importance of integrating aldosterone blockade into the management of patients with post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and clinical heart failure are common complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and result in substantially increased mortality and morbidity. Evidence-based cardiovascular protective therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, antiplatelet agents, and lipid-lowering medications, improve outcomes for these patients. However, this population is significantly undertreated with these guideline-recommended agents. Critical pathways have been demonstrated to improve the quality and consistency of treatment; as such, the new American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommend that critical pathways be implemented for the management of these patients. The recent Eplerenone Post-acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) demonstrates that eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, has incremental benefit in decreasing mortality and morbidity when used with standard care therapies in patients post AMI with heart failure and LVSD. The clinical trial evidence coupled with the national guidelines provides a strong rationale for routine incorporation of aldosterone blockade into new or already established critical pathways for AMI complicated by LVSD and heart failure.     

Angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists in chronic heart failure.

Prognosis in congestive heart failure is directly linked to neurohormonal activation. Angiotensin II through the activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system has been the principal focus therapy over the last 2 decades. New agents that target selective blockade of the angiotensin II receptor have been introduced in clinical trials for the treatment of heart failure. Aldosterone has been identified as a critically important neurohormone with direct detrimental effects on the myocardium. Aldosterone antagonists have been used in clinical trials to improve mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.     

Aldosterone blockade in post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure

Development of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) significantly increases mortality post acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Aldosterone contributes to the development and progression of HF post AMI, and major guidelines now recommend aldosterone blockade in this setting. However, lack of practical experience with aldosterone blockade may make clinicians hesitant to use these therapies. This review is based on a consensus cardiology conference that occurred in May 2005 (New York City) concerning these topics. Potential barriers to the use of aldosterone blockade are discussed and an algorithm for appropriate in-hospital pharmacologic management of AMI with LVSD and/or HF is presented.     

Effects of long-term enalapril and losartan therapy of heart failure on cardiovascular aldosterone

Plasma aldosterone escape is found during long-term ACE inhibitor therapy of chronic heart failure. Evidence for aldosterone production in cardiovascular tissues raised the question of whether aldosterone escape occurs or not in these tissues. Rats with infarction-induced chronic heart failure were treated with enalapril (20 mg/kg/d) and losartan (15 mg/kg/d) for 20 weeks. Untreated chronic heart failure and sham-operated rats were used as positive and normal controls, respectively. Ex vivo mesenteric artery and heart perfusion, high performance liquid chromatography, and RIA for aldosterone were performed. Chronic heart failure due to myocardial infarction was associated with tissue-specific activation of cardiovascular aldosterone synthesis. In the mesenteric artery, enalapril significantly inhibited aldosterone production compared to untreated, chronic heart failure rats, and losartan lowered aldosterone production to that of sham rats. In myocardium, enalapril failed to significantly inhibit aldosterone production, and losartan significantly inhibited aldosterone production compared to untreated, chronic heart failure rats. These results provide the first evidence that long-term ACE inhibition therapy induces aldosterone escape in myocardium but not in mesenteric artery of chronic heart failure. The angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blocker losartan tranquilized aldosterone levels in the cardiovascular tissues of chronic heart failure rats.     

Importance of RAA system and the treatment of patients with ACE inhibition after myocardial infarction

There is activation of the renin angiotensin system after both complicated and uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Angiotensin II increases myocardial oxygen consumption whilst reducing coronary flow and is also directly toxic to the myocardium. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors produce beneficial haemodynamic and neuroendocrine changes in patients with acute left ventricular failure, and may have a role in selected patients with cardiogenic shock. There is evidence to suggest that they might prevent the development of late cardiac failure by limiting the extent of post infarction ventricular dilation. Further research is necessary to define their role in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.     

Imaging left ventricular remodeling: targeting the neurohumoral axis

Left ventricular remodeling is a key determinant of the clinical course and outcome of systolic heart failure. The myocardial renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been closely linked to the major maladaptive cellular and molecular changes that accompany left ventricular remodeling. Direct inhibition of various components of the RAS, such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme, angiotensin II type 1 receptor, and aldosterone, has resulted in favorable clinical responses in heart failure. Many questions, however, remain unanswered regarding the timing of initiation, optimum doses, need for simultaneous use of RAS inhibitors, and proper monitoring of RAS blockade. Additionally, significant variation has been noted in individual responses to RAS blockade as a result of genetic differences. Answering these questions requires direct access to the myocardial component of RAS, which is largely independent of its systemic component. Molecular imaging using radiotracers with high affinities for myocardial angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II type 1 receptors can provide direct access to tissue RAS and thus provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of left ventricular remodeling in individual patients. This Article briefly reviews the potential for evaluating the tissue expression of angiotensin in heart failure by targeted RAS imaging.     

Role of angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: lessons from CHARM and VALIANT

The role of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction has changed after the VALIANT and CHARM trials. CHARM proved that candesartan is a good alternative for patients with chronic heart failure who cannot tolerate ACE-inhibitors. Moreover, VALIANT demonstrated non-inferiority of valsartan compared to captopril in patients after an acute myocardial infarction. The add-on effects of an ARB on top of an ACE-inhibitor are somewhat less pronounced, although a reduction in the number of hospitalizations for heart failure seems a consistent finding.     

Comparison of the effects of losartan and captopril on mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL trial design. Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and evidence of heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction during the acute phase have an excessive mortality risk. Therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors attenuates the detrimental effects of angiotensin II and has been shown to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality in this population. Selective, angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism with losartan, which inhibits the effects of angiotensin II regardless of its source at the receptor level, may provide more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. The Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (OPTIMAAL) study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, captopril-controlled trial. The primary hypothesis is that, compared with captopril, losartan will decrease the risk for all-cause mortality by 20% in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. The study population will consist of 5,000 patients, > or = 50 years of age, with heart failure during the acute phase or with a new Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction. Patients will be randomized to treatment with either losartan or captopril. All patients will be followed until 937 deaths occur (event-driven). The primary end point is total mortality (all-cause mortality). The secondary and tertiary end points are sudden death (and/or resuscitated cardiac death) and fatal/nonfatal reinfarction. Based on the assumed event rate, treatment effect and a 95% power to detect a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality at the 4.3% significance level (2-sided, adjusted for 2 interim analyses), the trial will enroll at least 5,004 patients and continue until a total number of 937 events has been reached (intention-to-treat analysis).     

ACE-Inhibition and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Chronic Heart Failure: Pathophysiological Consideration of the Unresolved Battle

Reducing the effects of angiotensin II by blockade of AT1-receptors may be superior to inhibition of angiotensin II formation by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, the results of several trials did not fulfil this expectation. In both ELITE II with symptomatic CHF patients and in OPTIMAAL involving high risk patients after acute myocardial infarction, angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptor blocker (ARB) losartan did not prove to be superior to captopril. There are several potential reasons, why ARBs did not fare better than ACE inhibitors. Although AT1-receptor blockade may block the effects of non-ACE pathways of tissue angiotensin II formation, no clinical evidence is available that a more powerful inhibition of the tissue renin-angiotensin system brings improved survival. The choice of patients for clinical trials of HF therapy is not based on the level of neurohumoral activation. Thus, the more effective attenuation of angiotensin II action with ARBs may not bring additional benefits. The potential antiremodeling effect of ARBs through the stimulation of AT2 receptors by angiotensin II could be counterbalanced by a failure of AT1-receptor blockers to enhance bradykinin, nitric oxide and prostacyclin formation with antigrowth properties. Although ACE-inhibitors seem to have slightly better results at present than AT1 blockers in the battle on heart failure patient, future trials will decide which is the definitive winner.