Prelabor rupture of membranes at term in low-risk women: induce or wait?

Objective: To compare the outcomes of expectant versus induction of labor management of patients presenting with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term. Study design: Observational case–control study over a period of 36 months. Setting: King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Subjects: All obstetric patients with no obstetric risk factors, other than PROMs at term, were included in our study. Each patient was matched with a control case, whose labor started with intact membranes. Outcome measures: Length of labor duration, fetal distress, intrapartum pyrexia, rate of cesarean delivery, and Apgar scores at birth. Results: The length of labor duration was shorter in patients with PROMs at term compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, cesarean section (CS) rate was 4.5% in the PROMs group versus 5.5% in the control group. Among patients with PROM who received induction of labor management, the rates of intrapartum pyrexia and CS were almost twice than in patients who were managed expectantly. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In the absence of other obstetric and maternal or fetal risk factors, PROMs at term does not seem to constitute additional obstetric risks. Furthermore, expectant management of PROM at term enhances the patient’s chance of normal vaginal delivery without an increase in fetal and/or maternal morbidity.     

Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: expectant management at home or in hospital? The TermPROM Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adverse effects of expectant management for premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term and patient satisfaction were greater if women were managed at home rather than in a hospital. METHODS: We undertook a secondary analysis of data from the International TermPROM Study for women managed expectantly at home or in a hospital. Using multiple logistic regression analyses, we determined the effect of home and hospital management and controlled for differences in baseline characteristics, in measures of maternal and neonatal infections and rates of cesarean. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-three women (39.1%) were managed at home, and 1017 (60.9%) in a hospital. Management at home, compared with in a hospital, increased risk of nulliparas needing antibiotics before delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.52 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 2.24, P =.03), those not colonized with group B streptococcus having cesareans (OR 1.48 95% CI 1.03, 2. 14, P =.04), and neonatal infections (OR 1.97 95% CI 1.00, 3.90, P =. 05). More multiparas managed at home said they would participate in the study again (OR 1.80 95% CI 1.27, 2.54, P <.001). CONCLUSION: Expectant management at home, rather than in a hospital, might increase the likelihood of some adverse outcomes.     

Low-risk pregnancy at 41 weeks: when should we induce labor?

Objective: To study the perinatal outcome according to whether labor was induced or not, when a low-risk pregnancy reached 41 weeks of gestation. Methods: A quasi-experimental study of 11492 low-risk singleton pregnancies was designed. A total of 1,721 patients (15.0%) women met the study criteria, were informed about the risks and benefits and gave their informed consent, of whom 629 (36.5%) were planned for induction soon after the 41 weeks (287–289 days). Results: An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. The proportion of small-for-gestational age babies was lower in the early-induced labor cohort (10.5% versus 15%; p?=?0.008). This cohort showed an increased hospital stay (4.54 versus 3.80 days; p?<?0.001), and a higher rate of requiring delivery by caesarean section (31.1% versus 19.8%;p?<?0.001), including the need for caesarean section for failed induction (21.8% versus 11%;p?<?0.001). Three stillbirths occurred in the group followed expectantly, whereas no stillbirths were seen in the early induction group. Conclusions: Induction of labor for prolonged pregnancy in low-risk patients soon after the 41 weeks, reduces the proportion of small-for-gestational age babies, but increases the mean hospital stay as well as the need for delivery by caesarean section, including that for failed induction.     

Management of cervical cerclage at term: remove the suture in labor?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risks and benefits to patients who carry to term after undergoing a Shirodkar cerclage where the cerclage is not removed until the patient presents in labor. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted examining all patients who underwent a Shirodkar cerclage employing a 5 mm Mersilene band. All the cerclages were placed by a single operator over a twenty five year span, from 1/01/74 till 10/01/98. Only patients who delivered vaginally or were allowed a trial of labor were included. In all cases, the cerclage was removed under regional anesthesia after the patient presented to the hospital in labor. RESULTS: Ninety six cerclage procedures were performed over that period. Eighty two pregnancies qualified for review. Sixty two patients delivered vaginally (76%). Nine cesareans were indicated for failure to progress in labor (11%) with cervical dystocia possibly implicated in one. There were no cases of ruptured uteri or the development of uterine windows. Of the 82 pregnancies there were five cases (6%) of minor cervical laceration. CONCLUSION: Allowing patients to proceed to labor with a Shirodkar, cerclage in place, does not increase the risks of cervical dystocia, cervical laceration, or uterine rupture above the reported incidence for these complications in patients in whom the cerclage is removed prophylactically.     

Premature rupture of the membranes: a cause for neonatal osteomyelitis?

Osteomyelitis is rare in the neonatal period. Many etiologic factors for causing neonatal osteomyelitis have been discussed in the literature; however, premature rupture of the membranes has never been emphasized. We report on a neonate with osteomyelitis of the right humerus infected with an uncommon pathogen, Klebsiella pneumonia. In the absence of any perinatal disease, premature rupture of the membranes was suggested to be the cause of the illness. The infant was initially regarded as having Erb palsy because of the absence of systemic symptoms and lack of perinatal high-risk factors. Antibiotic administration was delayed for 3 weeks. Luckily, nearly complete recovery was noted after 2 months of follow up. We emphasize the importance of considering osteomyelitis in a newborn infant with limb palsy, particularly in the presence of premature rupture of the membranes of the mother. We also discuss the results of the microbial examination and significance of magnetic resonance imaging in neonatal osteomyelitis.     

Are we ready for a new look at the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes?

Abstract

Premature rupture of membranes is a significant contributor to preterm birth with its associated short- and long-term complications. The absence of a standard approach to its management places a burden on the clinicians’ ability to promptly and accurately diagnose premature rupture of membranes. For the last half century, there have been no significant changes in the way premature ruptured membranes is diagnosed. With the advent of newer, amniotic fluid-specific, noninvasive, and accurate markers, there is an opportunity to update the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes.     

Induction of labor for term small-for-gestational-age fetuses: what are the consequences?

Objective

To evaluate whether early term labor induction for suspected intrauterine growth restriction (weeks 37–39) improves neonatal outcome for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates.

Study design

Delivery room data for 2004–2008 from a single tertiary medical center were linked to neonatal discharge data from the same institution. Data were limited to all singleton, liveborn SGA neonates born at 37–42 weeks of gestation and their mothers. Births with known congenital anomalies were excluded. Women undergoing induction of labor for suspected growth restriction between 37 and 39 weeks’ gestation (early induction SGA) were compared with women who gave birth to term SGA neonates without early induction. SGA (<10th percentile for gestational age and gender) was used as a surrogate for intrauterine growth restriction. Associations between early term labor induction and neonatal morbidities were estimated using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 2378 SGA neonates meeting study criteria were identified. Of these, 445 underwent early term induction and 1933 were in the non-early induction SGA group. Intrauterine demise among term (37–42 weeks) SGAs occurred in one case at 37 weeks. Early term induction for SGA was associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Several neonatal complications, including hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia and respiratory complications were more prevalent in the early induction SGA group. The increased odds for neonatal complications persisted after controlling for possible confounders.

Conclusions

Early term induction for SGA fetuses results in an increased risk of cesarean deliveries as well as neonatal metabolic and respiratory complications, with no apparent neonatal benefit.     

Late preterm and early term: when to induce a growth restricted fetus? A population-based study

Purpose: (1) Compare fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with induction of labor (IOL) versus expectant management (EM) in women with isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR) between 34^0/7 and 38^6/7 weeks; (2) Determine optimal gestational age for delivery of such fetuses.

Materials and methods: A retrospective population based cohort study of 2232 parturients with isolated FGR, including two groups: (1) IOL (n?=?1428); 2) EM (n?=?804).

Results: IOL group had a lower stillbirth and neonatal death rates (p?=?.042, p?p?=?.001, p?=?.039). In the early term cohort, EM was associated with a higher rate of NRFHR and low 1?min Apgar scores (p?=?.003, p?=?.002). IOL at 37 weeks protected from stillbirth but not from adverse composite neonatal outcomes.

Conclusions: IOL of FGR fetuses at 37?weeks had a protective effect against stillbirth. In addition, at late preterm, it is associated with lower rates of stillbirth, neonatal death, and NRFHR.     

Do antenatal corticosteroids help in the setting of preterm rupture of membranes?

OBJECTIVE: It is now accepted that corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery reduces neonatal mortality and morbidity. However, corticosteroid use in the setting of rupture of membranes remains controversial. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed data from the first and largest randomized trial in this area and included them in a new meta-analysis. RESULTS: Data from 318 women with rupture of membranes in the Auckland Trial showed that there was a trend toward reduction of the risk of respiratory distress syndrome with corticosteroids but that this trend did not reach statistical significance. There was little effect on the risks of neonatal death, intraventricular hemorrhage, and fetal, neonatal, or maternal infection. Combined data from 15 controlled trials involving >1400 women with rupture of membranes confirmed that corticosteroids reduce the risks of respiratory distress syndrome (relative risk, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.70), intraventricular hemorrhage (relative risk, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.70), and necrotizing enterocolitis (relative risk, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.82). They also may reduce the risk of neonatal death (relative risk, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-1.07). They do not appear to increase the risk of infection in either mother (relative risk, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.20) or baby (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.68). The duration of rupture of membranes does not alter these outcomes. CONCLUSION: The available data indicate that corticosteroid administration is beneficial in the setting of rupture of membranes. In our opinion further trials to address this question cannot be justified.     

Preterm premature rupture of membranes: is home care acceptable?

Background: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is a frequent obstetric condition associated with increased risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Conventional management is in hospital. Outpatient management is an alternative in selected cases; however, the safety of home management has not been established.

Objective: To study the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women with preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 weeks who were managed as outpatient (outpatient care group), compared with those managed in hospital (hospital care group).

Study design: A retrospective cohort study between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013 in three French tertiary care centers.

Results: Ninety women were included in the outpatient care group and 324 in the hospital care group. In the outpatient care group, the gestational age at membrane rupture was lower, compared to the hospital care group (28.8 (26.6–30.5) vs. 30.3 (27.6–32.1) weeks; p?p?Conclusion: We observed no major complication related to home care after a period of observation. A randomized study would be necessary to confirm its safety.     

Does magnesium sulfate delay the active phase of labor in women with premature rupture of membranes? A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveAdministration of many drugs including magnesium sulfate (MS) has considerable influences on pregnancy outcomes. The present study investigates the effects of MS administration on reaching the active phase of labor in women with premature rupture of membrane (PROM) and subsequent fetal complications.Materials and methodsA double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed among primipara women referred to the PROM center in Tehran, Iran between March 2010 and August 2012. Patients were equally allocated into two groups; the intervention group who received MS (n = 46) and the control (placebo) group (n = 46). Both groups received a corticosteroid, 1g oral azithromycin (oral) and 2 g ampicillin (IV) every 6 hours for 48 hours, followed by amoxicillin (500 mg orally 3 times daily) for an additional 5 days. None of the research staff were aware of the treatment allocation of patients in order for blinding purposes.ResultsAdministration of MS in intervention group increases this period 2.7 times compared to the control group. In women whose gestational age was <30 weeks, MS administration increased the active phase of labor up to 77%. Administration of magnesium sulfate reduced the risk of respiratory distress syndrome significantly (p = 0 .002), without producing any adverse pregnancy outcomes.ConclusionMagnesium sulfate increases delay in reaching the active phase of labor in mothers with PROM, without producing adverse birth outcomes. (Registration ID in IRCT; IRCT2012091810876N1).     

Management of cervical cerclage and preterm premature rupture of the membranes: should the stitch be removed?

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether retention of cerclage after preterm premature rupture of the membranes occurring before 34 completed weeks' gestation influences pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Singleton pregnancies with cerclage and premature rupture of the membranes between 24.0 and 34.9 weeks were reviewed. Women were excluded if they were first seen in labor, had chorioamnionitis, or were delivered within 48 hours. Control subjects consisted of women with premature rupture of the membranes without cerclage. RESULTS: Eighty-one cases of cerclage with premature rupture of the membranes met criteria for inclusion: 30 women (37%) had their cerclage removed at presentation, and 51 (63%) retained the cerclage until delivery. Cases were similar in terms of gestational age at placement and gestational age at premature rupture of the membranes. There was no significant difference between the retained, removed, or control groups in terms of latency, gestational age at delivery, chorioamnionitis, or neonatal morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Retention of cervical cerclage after premature rupture of the membranes occurring before 34 completed weeks' gestation is associated with comparable clinical outcomes with respect to latency and perinatal outcome, when compared with removal of the cerclage.     

Duration of labor induction in nulliparous women at term: how long is long enough?

We evaluated the relationship between duration of labor induction and successful vaginal delivery (VD) in nulliparous women at term. Nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies > or = 37 weeks who underwent labor induction at a single institution were studied. Exclusion criteria were nonvertex presentation, stillbirth, fetal chromosomal/structural abnormalities, spontaneous labor, and spontaneous rupture of membranes. VD rates and maternal/neonatal outcomes were evaluated and compared with respect to the duration from induction to delivery. Over the 1-year study period, 340 women met all criteria. Seventy-five percent achieved VD (n = 255), 40.6% of whom had rate of cervical dilation in active labor < 1.0 cm/hour. Women requiring cesarean delivery were more likely to have fetal acidemia, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, chorioamnionitis, and endometritis. There was no association with prolonged induction to delivery intervals and adverse maternal/neonatal outcomes. In our population, only 5.7% of nulliparous women undergoing labor induction at term remain undelivered at 48 hours. Of women achieving VD, > 40% had rate of cervical dilation in active labor < 1.0 cm/hour.