Endopyelotomy for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

Percutaneous endopyelotomy has been shown to be successful in treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Little data have been published regarding this procedure in children. We describe 4 patients 6.5 weeks to 5.5 years old who underwent percutaneous endopyelotomy to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction following failed open dismembered pyeloplasty. Preoperative obstruction was demonstrated by a nephrostogram, diuretic renogram and/or ultrasonography. Percutaneous endopyelotomy was successful in relieving the obstruction in all 4 patients, although 2 required secondary endoscopic procedures. One patient had persistent obstruction 40 days after endopyelotomy at the ureteropelvic junction and, subsequently, required percutaneous resection of a persistent flap of obstructing tissue. In another patient a ureterovesical stricture was noted at the time of stent removal, which was treated by endoscopic incision. All patients have been followed from 1.5 to 3 years postoperatively. Followup diuretic renograms, ultrasound and/or excretory urography demonstrated a patent ureteropelvic junction in all patients and all have remained asymptomatic. Endopyelotomy appears to be safe and effective in treating secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.     

Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty

PURPOSE: First line treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction is still open dismembered pyeloplasty. The development of videoendoscopic techniques like endopyelotomy and laparoscopy offers less invasive alternatives. The long-term outcome of an algorithm selectively using these techniques is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1995 to March 2006, 256 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction were treated with 113 laser endopyelotomies and 143 laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasties. According to changing selection criteria, an early group (92 in 1995 to 1999) treated with laser endopyelotomy for extrinsic as well as intrinsic stenoses, and a late group (164 in 2000 to 2006) treated with laser endopyelotomy for intrinsic stenosis, were evaluated. In the late group extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction was treated with nondismembered pyeloplasty in cases of anteriorly and by dismembered pyeloplasty in cases of posteriorly crossing vessels or a redundant renal pelvis. RESULTS: Operating time of laser endopyelotomy averaged 34 (range 10 to 90) minutes with a complication rate of 5.3% and a success rate of 72.6% (intrinsic 85.7% vs extrinsic 51.4%). Operating time of laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty averaged 124 (range 37 to 368) minutes with a 6.3% complication rate and an overall success rate of 94.4% (intrinsic 100% vs extrinsic 93.8%). In the late group the LAP success rate was 98.3% with no significant differences related to the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (intrinsic 100% vs extrinsic 98.1%) or the type of pyeloplasty (YV plasty 97.0% vs Anderson-Hynes 97.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty yields an efficacy similar to that of open surgery. The inferior success of laser endopyelotomy even in optimally selected cases and the increasing expertise with endoscopic suturing may favor laparoscopic pyeloplasty with or without robotic assistance in the future.     

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has become a viable option for the treatment of select patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction with success rates similar to those of open surgery. However, little has been written on the application of this technique for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We report the largest series of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction managed by laparoscopic pyeloplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1994 and March 2001, 36 patients underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The patients had undergone an average of 1.3 ureteropelvic junction procedures (range 1 to 4) prior to presentation, including cutting balloon retrograde endopyelotomy in 28, antegrade endoscopic endopyelotomy in 7, retrograde endoscopic endopyelotomy in 4, retrograde balloon dilation in 4 and open pyeloplasty in 3. A preoperative diagnosis of recurrent obstruction was confirmed by renal scan in 31 cases, retrograde pyelography in 2 and computerized tomography in 3. Of the 31 patients who underwent spiral computerized tomography angiogram 87% had crossing vessels. Laparoscopic repair comprised dismembered pyeloplasty in 31 cases, Fengerplasty in 3 and flap repair in 2. Postoperative renal scan or excretory urography objective followup was available for all patients at a mean of 10 months (range 3 to 40). Postoperative subjective patient well-being was assessed using an analog pain scale at a mean followup of 21.8 months (range 3 to 85). RESULTS: Average operative time was 6.2 hours (range 2.7 to 10). Average hospital stay was 2.9 days (range 1 to 7). One intraoperative complication occurred, that is bleeding necessitating conversion to an open procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 8 cases, including anastomotic leakage in 4, and urinary tract infection, pneumonia, atelectasis, fever, bilateral upper extremity weakness and stone formation 2 months postoperatively in 1 each. On excretory urography, furosemide renal scan or the Whitaker test 32 of 36 patients (89%) had a widely patent ureteropelvic junction. Two patients (5.5%) had equivocal radiographic studies but were asymptomatic. In 2 patients the ureteropelvic junction was obstructed by renal scan. One patient had an indwelling stent for renal function deterioration and 1 was asymptomatic. Hence, 34 of the 36 patients (94%) had a reasonable objective response. Overall a 50% or greater decrease in pain was seen in 32 of 36 patients (89%). In the 4 patients with a less than 50% decrease in pain objective renal scans showed an open ureteropelvic junction. As such, the overall success rate of a greater than 50% decrease in pain, a patent ureteropelvic junction and stable or improved function of the affected renal unit was 83% (30 of 36 patients). CONCLUSIONS: For secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction, laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be performed safely with a success rate comparable to that of standard open pyeloplasty. The patient benefits of laparoscopic ureteropelvic junction repair of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction are similar to the benefits of laparoscopic repair of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.     

Laparoscopic dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty: a novel technique.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty is now an effective option for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We describe a novel laparoscopic technique of dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty for a difficult recurrent long ureteropelvic junction stricture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 73-year-old woman with ureteropelvic junction obstruction of a solitary left kidney had undergone failed multiple procedures, including open pyeloplasty, balloon incision endopyelotomy, retrograde balloon dilation and percutaneous endopyelotomy. Using a 4-port transperitoneal laparoscopic technique, the upper ureter was dissected, the scarred ureteropelvic junction stricture was excised and the dismembered ureteropelvic junction was closed with a stitch. A wide base renal pelvic flap was created and tubularized to bridge the 3 cm. upper ureteral defect. Laparoscopic intracorporeal freehand suturing was done to reconstruct the renal pelvis and upper ureter over a Double-J stent (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York). RESULTS: Total operative time was 4.5 hours and hospital stay was 4 days. The stent was removed 3 weeks later. At the 2-month followup the patient was asymptomatic. Excretory urography and diuretic renal scan confirmed a widely patent upper ureter with unobstructed drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Dismembered renal pelvis tubularized flap pyeloplasty can be successfully performed laparoscopically to bridge a long upper ureteral defect. This approach is feasible even in a ureteropelvic junction in which previous surgery has failed.     

EXTRAPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF 55 PROCEDURES

PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility, reproducibility and morbidity of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 55 retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed at 3 institutions between September 1996 and May 2000 in 33 women and 21 men. Results were analyzed in regard to radiological assessment by excretory urography at 3 months, complications and hospital stay. RESULTS: We performed dismembered pyeloplasty in 48 cases and Fenger plasty in 7 cases. Crossing vessels were noted in 23 patients. The conversion rate was 5.4%. Mean operative time was 185 minutes (range 100 to 260), mean hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 1 to 14) and mean followup was 14.4 months (range 6 to 43.6). The overall complication rate was 12.7%. Complications in 7 patients included hematoma in 3, urinoma in 1, severe pyelonephritis in 1 and anastomotic stricture in 2 requiring open pyeloplasty at 3 weeks and delayed balloon incision at 13 months, respectively. Excretory urography in 50 patients and ultrasound in 4 showed decreased hydronephrosis in 88.9% at 3 months. Normal physical activity and absent pain were reported by 47 patients (87%) 1 month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty seems to be a valuable alternative to open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The long-term outcome must be assessed before this procedure may be definitively validated.     

后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术(附22例报告)

目的：探讨后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术的临床效果。方法：采用后腹腔途径对22例确诊为肾盂输尿管连接部(UPJ)梗阻的患者施行腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术。结果：22例手术全部成功。手术时间70～180min，平均108min；术中出血量5～50ml，平均16ml；术后住院时间6～8d，平均7．2d。围术期无并发症。16例术后获随访3～15个月，UPJ吻合口无狭窄，肾积水得到改善。结论：后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术是治疗UPJ梗阻有效、安全及微创的方法，值得临床推广使用。     

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience in 15 cases

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. METHODS: From September 1996 to January 1999, 15 patients underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Aberrant vessels were noted in 4 patients. Dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in 7 patients and nondismembered Fenger plasty in 7 patients. Pyeloplasty was not possible in 1 patient. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 15 procedures were successfully completed. The procedure was not possible in 1 patient who had already undergone endopyelotomy repair. The mean operating time was 178 minutes (range 100 to 250), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.8 days (range 1 to 14). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (two hematomas and one urinoma). Radiographic assessment by intravenous urography 3 months after the procedure showed good results. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopy, by providing easy and rapid access to the retroperitoneal space, seems to be a valuable alternative treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.     

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty using endoscopic GIA stapler for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE: We applied laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 10 patients with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. To evaluate the efficiency and safety of this procedure using an endoscopic GIA stapler, the clinical outcomes and our procedures are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1996 to March 2003, eight female and two male patients with a mean age of 22.3 years suffering from UPJ obstruction diagnosed by various combinations of ultrasonography, excretory urography, retrograde ureteropyelography, CT, and MRI were treated with laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty with resection of a dilated redundant renal pelvis. In six cases, an endoscopic gastrointestinal automatic stapler (Endo-GIA) was used. The procedure was performed via an extraperitoneal approach in two cases and a transperitoneal approach in eight. RESULTS: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was successful in all patients, including the six treated using an Endo- GIA stapler. The mean operating time was 291 minutes, and the mean anastomotic time was 105 minutes, with a mean estimated blood loss of 44 mL. Postoperative complications occurred in five cases: anastomotic urinary leakage in two and pyelonephritis in three. The mean time to full convalescence in the entire series was 22 days. No urolithiasis occurred in the patients treated with the Endo-GIA stapler during the follow-up period of 2 to 76 (mean 22) months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty including the Endo-GIA stapler technique is an efficient and safe procedure that provides excellent results for extrinsic or complicated UPJ stenosis. The risk of stone formation has not yet been determined.     

Open dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty: an effective and simple operation for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rate of dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty (DTFP) in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study from August 2002 to September 2004, 15 patients with a mean age of 21 years (range 2-47) in whom UPJO had been diagnosed by sonography, excretory urography or diuretic renography and who had a large extrarenal pelvis, underwent operation via flank intercostal incision. The proximal ureter and renal pelvis were dissected and mobilized retroperitoneally, the site of UPJO was excised and the site of insertion of the ureter on the renal pelvis was closed with a stitch. A wide based renal pelvic flap was created and tubularized to bridge the upper ureteral defect. After insertion of a nephrostomy tube, a double-J tube was inserted as an internal ureteral stent and anastomosis of the tubularized flap to the spatulated upper ureter was done and the renal pelvis window was closed. Patients were followed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean operation time was 1 h and mean hospital stay was 3 days. The ureteral stent was removed 4 weeks after operation and at the same time a nephrostogram was done that showed a widely patent ureteropelvic junction with good renal pelvis drainage in 12 ( approximately 80%) of the cases, but in 3 cases (approximately 20%) passage of contrast materials was not seen. In these patients, methylene blue was injected via a nephrostomy tube and in 2 patients (14%) urine color turned blue 20 min later, but in 1 patient (7%) this test was also negative. The latter patient underwent percutaneous endopyelotomy later. Mean patient follow-up was 14 months. Follow-up excretory urography confirmed patent and unobstructed ureteropelvic junction in all patients. The overall success rate of DTFP was 93%. CONCLUSION: DTFP is a simple and effective procedure for patients with UPJO who have long or multiple upper ureteral strictures and a large extrarenal pelvis.     

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy

PURPOSE: We present our experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty plus pyelolithotomy in patients in whom stones were not the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A transperitoneal approach was used for laparoscopic pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy in 19 patients (20 renal units). Before ureteropelvic junction repair stones were extracted through a small pyelotomy that was eventually incorporated into the final pyeloplasty incision. Stones in the renal pelvis were removed with rigid graspers under direct laparoscopic vision. A flexible cystoscope introduced through a port was used to extract stones in the calices. The renal pelvis was reconstructed based on the anatomy of the ureteropelvic junction. RESULTS: A median of 1 stone (range 1 to 28) was recovered. In 11, 8 and 1 patients the Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty, Y-V plasty and the Heinecke Mickulicz procedure were performed, respectively. At 3 months 2 patients had residual calculi for a procedural stone-free rate of 90%. There was no evidence of obstruction in 18 of the 20 cases (90%), as confirmed by negative diuretic scan or radiological improvement of hydronephrosis. At a mean followup of 12 months (range 3 to 57) 2 additional patients had recurrent stones for an overall long-term stone-free rate of 80% (16 of 20). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is feasible when combined with pyeloplasty. Our results are comparable to those of stone removal during open pyeloplasty or percutaneous endopyelotomy. The advantages of open surgery appear to be maintained in this minimally invasive approach.     

Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: description of new technique

PURPOSE: We present a novel technique of percutaneous endopyeloplasty, in which the conventional longitudinal endopyelotomy incision is precisely sutured in a horizontal Heineke-Mikulicz fashion through the solitary percutaneous tract, thus, achieving Fenger-plasty type of repair of the ureteropelvic junction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty was performed in 9 patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Essential steps of our novel technique include retrograde placement of a ureteral catheter over a guide wire into the renal pelvis, establishing conventional percutaneous renal access, creating a conventional longitudinal endopyelotomy incision and performing full-thickness horizontal suturing of the endopyelotomy incision in Heineke-Mikulicz fashion. Suturing was done using the novel 5 mm. Sew Right 5 SR laparoscopic suturing device (LSI Solutions, Rochester, New York) passed through the nephroscope. RESULTS: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty was technically successful in all 9 patients. Mean total operative time was 100.8 minutes (range 62 to 140.), including an endopyeloplasty suturing time of 26.6 minutes (range 14 to 54.). We placed 1 to 4 endopyeloplasty sutures per case. Blood loss was minimal, mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (range 2 to 3) and the ureteral Double-J stent (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) was removed in 2 weeks. At a mean followup of 4 months all operated kidneys showed relief of obstruction, as confirmed by clinical improvement in symptoms and improved renal drainage on excretory urography and diuretic renography. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty is technically feasible, safe and effective. Potential advantages over conventional endopyelotomy include wider caliber reconstruction of the ureteropelvic junction, full-thickness healing with primary intent, minimal urinary extravasation and shorter stenting duration. To our knowledge the initial clinical experience is presented.     

Pediatric Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty

We performed laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in a boy with right ureteropelvic junction obstruction using 4 cannula sites, and a dismembering and reanastomosis technique identical to that used in open pyeloplasty. Interrupted sutures were placed and tied intracorporeally. A nephrostomy tube was placed under direct vision for drainage but no ureteral stent was used. Total operating time was 5 hours. The patient was discharged home 36 hours after the procedure. The nephrostomy tube was removed 10 days postoperatively after radiographic demonstration of patency and 24 hours of clamping without pain. Followup excretory urography at 6 weeks showed much less hydronephrosis and a widely patent anastomosis. Our case illustrates the technical features and feasibility of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children, and should encourage further development of pediatric urological reconstructive laparoscopic techniques.     

Endopyelotomy for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

A total of 12 patients underwent primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction between November 1, 1985 and December 31, 1986. Ten patients underwent percutaneous incision of the ureteropelvic junction (endopyelotomy) as the initial effort to correct the obstruction. Two patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction associated with an aberrant lower pole renal artery underwent dismembered pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes) via a flank incision. Of the 10 patients who underwent endopyelotomy 8 (80 per cent) have shown radiographic improvement. Radiographic stability of the obstructed ureteropelvic junction was demonstrated in the remaining 2 patients. No patient exhibited evidence of increased obstruction or decreased renal function. No patient required prolonged or rehospitalization for complications, and none required additional endoscopic or surgical procedures. All patients have remained clinically well after the initial release from the hospital.     

Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in the pediatric population is comparable to open dismembered pyeloplasty in success rates. Experience with this procedure however remains limited. We review our experience with this technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The hospital records of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for UPJO between May 2001 and May 2005 were reviewed. Only those who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for single system UPJO were included in the study. Indications for surgical correction were T(1/2) > or = 20 minutes by diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid Lasix renography or symptomatology with hydronephrosis seen on renal ultrasonography (US). RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were identified, all of whom were treated surgically for salvageable UPJO. Four underwent percutaneous endopyelotomy for concomitant urolithiasis, 27 underwent open dismembered pyeloplasty (parent choice or under 18 months of age), and 28 underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. One patient had bilateral laparoscopic repairs at different times, resulting in 29 renal units that were reconstructed laparoscopically. Of these, 28 were completed. Eighteen procedures were performed on boys and 11 on girls. The mean age was 8.1 (1.6-18.9) years. The mean operating room time was 255 (157-396) minutes. Estimated blood loss was <10 mL in every patient. One patient required hospitalization longer than 23 hours because of postoperative ileus. A retroperitoneal urinoma developed in another patient, despite having a ureteral stent; it resolved with urethral catheter drainage. The first laparoscopic pyeloplasty resulted in open conversion because of failure of progression of the ureteropelvic anastomosis. At a mean follow-up of 27.9 (7.6-58.0) months, all patients demonstrated improvement of symptoms and drainage on nuclear renography or a decrease in the grade of hydronephrosis on renal US. CONCLUSION: Our series of patients undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty had excellent results with low morbidity. We consider this our primary technique for surgical correction of UPJO in patients older than 18 months.     

后腹腔镜下离断式肾盂成形术

目的:探讨后腹腔镜离断式肾盂成形术的临床效果。方法:腹腔镜下通过后腹腔途径对肾盂输尿管连接部(UPJ)狭窄5例患者行离断式肾盂成形术。结果:5例手术均获成功,手术时间80~180m in,平均110m in;术中出血量30~90m l,平均50m l;漏尿1例;术后住院8~15d,平均10d。术后随访1~12个月,UPJ吻合口无狭窄,肾积水改善。结论:后腹腔镜肾盂成形术微创,安全、效果好,值得推广。     

Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been established as a minimally invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty. However, little is known about the treatment of patients in whom this technique fails. We present our experience with treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 1993 to September of 2003, 227 patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of these patients 10 (4.4%), including 6 females and 4 males 24 to 62 years old (mean age 42.1), underwent secondary treatment after laparoscopic pyeloplasty failed. The type of secondary intervention varied by anatomical factors, and patient and surgeon preference. Success was defined as symptomatic relief and improved radiographic imaging at latest followup. RESULTS: Secondary interventions were repeat laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 1 patient, retrograde endoscopic balloon dilation in 2 and endopyelotomy in 7 (laser, cold knife and cutting balloon endopyelotomy in 3, 2, and 2, respectively). No postoperative complications were seen. Patients were followed for a mean of 25.5 months (range 3 to 96) after the second procedure. Seven of 10 secondary interventions (70%) were successful with no obstruction on followup imaging. Three of 10 interventions (30%) failed, namely 1 laparoscopic pyeloplasty, 1 endoscopic balloon dilation and 1 laser endopyelotomy. Failure of the second procedure occurred at a mean of 9.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: When given the choice, most patients select endoscopic management after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty due to its minimally invasive nature and low complication rate. Success rates are 70% with repeat intervention. Some patients require a third intervention.     

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review factors that affect the success of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair and recent developments in minimally invasive procedures for the repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent reports and studies further confirm earlier findings that the success rate of endopyelotomy is decreased when a crossing vessel is the primary cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, poor renal function and significant hydronephrosis. Various minimally invasive procedures have emerged recently for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. These include laparoscopic pyeloplasty, robotically assisted laparoscopic procedures, and percutaneous endopyeloplasty. These procedures offer potential advantages over conventional endopyelotomy, including better success rates in the presence of crossing vessels, wider caliber reconstruction of the ureteropelvic junction, and full-thickness healing with primary intent. SUMMARY: With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction available, the treatment choice for ureteropelvic junction obstruction must be based on several factors, including the success and morbidity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, the cost of the procedure, and the patient's choice.     

Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty--the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels

OBJECTIVE: Herein we report our experience of 49 consecutive pyeloplasties that were all laparoscopically performed with an intracorporeally sutured anastomosis. We describe the operative technique, complications and outcomes during a follow-up period of 1-53 months (mean 23.2 months). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients (28 women and 21 men) with a mean age of 34 years (range 6-65 years) underwent a laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty because of primary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction with hydronephrosis in each case. The preoperative evaluation included an evaluation for pain, an excretory urography (IVP), renal scan and sometimes CT angiography to evaluate for crossing vessels. Follow-up studies included an IVP, renal scan and renal ultrasound 4 weeks postoperatively and every 3 months thereafter. Success was considered as improvement of the pain score and IVP (less hydronephrosis, visible UPJ and/or normalization of drainage) or absence of an obstructive pattern during the washout phase of a renal scan. RESULTS: There was no conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 165 min (range 90-240 min). Blood loss was negligible. Crossing vessels were noted in 57.1% of the patients (28/49). Postoperative hospital stay was 3.7 days (range 3-6 days). One patient had a leakage of the anastomosis on postoperative day 1 and needed to undergo laparoscopic repair. The mean follow-up is 23.2 months (range 1-53 months). There was one single late failure. This patient later underwent an open revision of the laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In all other patients (48/49), the obstruction was resolved or significantly improved. The long-term success rate is 97.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasties compare favorably with those achieved by open pyeloplasties with less perioperative morbidity and discomfort. We do believe that laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with an intracorporeal anastomosis is the method of choice in the treatment of the UPJ obstruction in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels.     

MISSED ANTERIOR CROSSING VESSELS DURING OPEN RETROPERITONEAL PYELOPLASTY: LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSPERITONEAL DISCOVERY AND REPAIR

PURPOSE: Extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to anterior crossing segmental renal vessels is present in more than 50% of patients in adulthood. In this situation the ureter must usually be dismembered and transposed anterior to the crossing vascular structures, where it is anastomosed to the renal pelvis. Via the open retroperitoneal approach there may be a limited view of the anterior surface of the ureteropelvic junction and, hence, anterior crossing vessels may possibly be missed. We describe 2 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in whom anterior vessels were missed during open retroperitoneal repair. Laparoscopic transperitoneal secondary pyeloplasty with posterior displacement of the crossing renal vessel was performed in each case. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two patients presented with symptomatic congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed endopyelotomy in 1 and failed open retroperitoneal procedures in both. Preoperatively spiral computerized tomography angiography with a ureteropelvic junction protocol revealed crossing vessels in the 2 cases. This finding was confirmed at transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The ureter and renal pelvis were transposed anterior to the crossing vessels and 2 rows of running sutures were placed to complete the anastomosis. RESULTS: The 2 laparoscopic procedures were completed successfully. The anterior crossing vessels were preserved in each case. Currently the patients are asymptomatic and furosemide washout renal scan was normal. CONCLUSIONS: Spiral CT angiography reliably delineates the renal vascular anatomy in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. This study may be valuable before planned open retroperitoneal ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty may successfully manage anterior crossing vessels associated with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.     

DISMEMBERED V-FLAP PYELOPLASTY

PURPOSE: We present a modified technique of pyeloplasty that seems ideally suited for reoperative as well as primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to high ureteral insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This repair combines the dismembered technique with creation of a V-flap of renal pelvis by dividing and incising through the ureteropelvic junction superolateral onto the pelvis to a height above the most dependent portion of the pelvis just exceeding the length of ureteral spatulation. The V-flap is completed by an inferolateral incision directed toward the lateral aspect of the pelvis at its most dependent portion. The tip of the V-flap is then flipped down and approximated to the apex of the posterior ureteral spatulation. Of the 12 cases managed by this procedure 2 were reoperative and 10 involved select primary repair with high ureteral insertion at the ureteropelvic junction. Patient age was 3 months to 17 years (median 11 months). Two procedures were performed via a dorsal lumbar incision in the oldest patients and 10 were done via the standard anterior extraperitoneal approach. Radiological evaluation, including mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan and/or excretory urography, was performed in all patients preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: In all patients postoperative mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan and/or excretory urography at 3 months and 1 year showed excellent drainage after dismembered V-flap pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Dismembered V-flap pyeloplasty has proved to be successful with a number of advantages over the Anderson-Hynes dismembered technique in select patients. These advantages include the avoidance of tissue tension that make mobilization of the kidney and ureter unnecessary, aggressive ureteral spatulation, creation of a dependent, funneled configuration and automatic tapering of a redundant pelvis in the routine course of closure without excision of tissue. This technique also has the advantage of being simpler than other flap repairs and it combines the physiological virtues of dismembered repair with the anatomical advantages of flap pyeloplasty.