Better speech performance in cochlear implant patients with GJB2-related deafness.

OBJECTIVE: We applied mutation screening in seven cochlear implant users to identify those persons with GJB2-related deafness to determine whether etiology of deafness was predictive of speech performance after implantation. METHODS: Direct sequence of GJB2 was conducted over seven cochlear implant users with prelingual hearing impairment and their speech, language and cognitive performance was examined. RESULTS: The three persons with GJB2-related deafness had a mean vocabulary of 1243 words compared to a mean vocabulary of 195 words in the four children with GJB2-unrelated deafness, although the number of patients examined here was limited. The developmental quotient (DQ) of cognitive ability also was higher in those children with GJB2-related deafness. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that better speech performance after cochlear implantation may be observed in persons with GJB2-related deafness. In the future, detailed phenotypic studies and mutation screening for non-syndromic hearing loss may play an important role in the preoperative assessment of prelingually-deafened children.     

Cochlear implantation for children with GJB2-related deafness

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Mutations in GJB2 are a common cause of congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Many children with these mutations receive cochlear implants for auditory habilitation. The purpose of the study was to compare the speech perception performance of cochlear implant patients with GJB2-related deafness to patients without GJB2-related deafness. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: Pediatric cochlear implant recipients who have been tested for GJB2 mutation underwent chart review. All patients received cochlear implantation at a tertiary referral center, followed by outpatient auditory habilitation. Charts were reviewed for cause and duration of deafness, age at time of cochlear implantation, intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of use, and current age. Results of standard tests of speech perception administered as a part of the patients' auditory habilitation were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty patients with GJB2 mutations were compared with 27 patients without GJB2 mutations. There was no statistical difference between patients with and without GJB2-related congenital sensorineural hearing loss with regard to open-set and closed-set speech recognition performance at 12, 24, and 36 months after cochlear implantation. Surgical complications were uncommon. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss without other comorbid conditions (eg, developmental delay, inner ear malformations) perform well when they receive cochlear implantation and auditory habilitation. The presence or absence of GJB2 mutation does not appear to impact speech recognition performance at 12, 24, and 36 months after implantation.     

Using assessment of higher brain functions of children with GJB2-associated deafness and cochlear implants as a procedure to evaluate language development

OBJECTIVE: While investigators have reported that patients with GJB2-associated deafness and cochlear implants have preferable language development, the mechanisms of this phenomenon remains unknown. The goal of the present study was to assess higher brain functions of patients with GJB2-related and GJB2-unrelated deafness as a method of evaluating language development. METHODS: Eight children with cochlear implants were subjected to genetic testing for GJB2 and underwent the Raven colored progressive matrices test, Rey's auditory verbal learning test, Rey's complex figure test, the standardized language test for aphasia, the picture vocabulary test, and the standardized comprehension test for abstract words. RESULTS: Three children were diagnosed with GJB2-related deafness, and five children were diagnosed with GJB2-unrelated deafness. All three GJB2-related cases demonstrated normal range higher brain functions and fair language development. By contrast, one GJB2-unrelated case showed a semantic disorder, another demonstrated a visual cognitive disorder with dyslexia, and another had attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Children with GJB2-unrelated deafness showed a high frequency of heterogeneous disorders that can affect proper language development. This difference between children with GJB2-related and GJB2-unrelated deafness may account for the improved language development in children with GJB2-related deafness and cochlear implants. Further, genetic diagnosis of the non-syndromic hearing loss represents a useful tool for the preoperative prediction of outcomes following a cochlear implant procedure.     

Auditory responses in cochlear implant users with and without GJB2 deafness

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: It is reasonable to suppose that the pattern of sensorineural damage along the length of the cochlea depends on the etiology of a hearing loss (HL). In GJB2-related deafness, we hypothesize that gap junction deficits are uniformly distributed and will result in similar damage along the length of the cochlea as compared with non-GJB2 subjects. We assessed this by measuring patterns of neural activity and hearing from apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode regions. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, blind, controlled study. METHODS: Blood from 301 pediatric cochlear implant users was analyzed for mutations in GJB2 by direct sequencing. After exclusion of patients with monoallelic GJB2 mutations, associated syndromes, or risk factors for HL that were not congenital, 39 children with biallelic GJB2 mutations and 58 without GJB2 mutations were evaluated. Hearing was measured before implantation at frequencies ranging from 250 Hz to 8 kHz. After implantation, neural activity at the apical and basal ends of the implanted array was measured using electrically evoked compound action potentials of the auditory nerve (ECAPs) and evoked stapedius reflexes (ESRs). RESULTS: GJB2 and non-GJB2 groups were not significantly different with respect to sex, age at implantation, duration of auditory deprivation, hearing aid use, duration of aided hearing, ear implanted, implant model, or depth of insertion (P>.05). Children with GJB2-related HL had greater similarities between low- and high-frequency residual hearing and between neural activity electrically evoked at apical and basal regions of the cochlea as compared with children with non-GJB2-related HL who demonstrated larger deficits in basal regions. CONCLUSION: Results suggest more consistent spiral ganglion survival along the length of the cochlea in GJB2-related HL as compared with non-GJB2-related HL, which appears to involve a decreasing gradient of spiral ganglion survival from the apex to the base of the cochlea. Our findings support our premise that in GJB2-related HL, dysfunction of gap junctions likely occurs to a similar degree in the apical and basal regions of the cochlea. This knowledge might be used to customize implantable devices for patients with HL in the future.     

Connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness and speech intelligibility after cochlear implantation.

HYPOTHESIS: Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation may depend on their deafness cause, including connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness. BACKGROUND: There is significant variability in the degree of intelligibility, or clarity, of children's speech after cochlear implantation. GJB2 gene-related deafness may be a factor, as preliminary data suggest that pathologic changes do not affect the spiral ganglion cells, which are the neural elements stimulated by the implant, thus favoring better results. METHODS: In an observational retrospective cohort study of pediatric cochlear implantees, 38 patients with nonsyndromic deafness of unknown cause and 1 with keratitisichthyosis-deafness syndrome underwent GJB2 mutation analysis using polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing. The primary outcome measure assessed was Speech Intelligibility Rating score from postoperative Year 1 (n = 39) to Year 5 (n = 17). Educational setting was considered as a secondary outcome measure. Statistical analysis was double-blinded, with patients and assessors of outcome unaware of GJB2 status. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had GJB2-related deafness and 25 had GJB2-unrelated deafness. Comparisons at Year 3 (n = 31) revealed intelligible speech achieved by 9 of 11 with GJB2-related deafness, compared with only 6 of 20 with GJB2-unrelated deafness (p = 0.017). Ordinal logistic regression analysis on Speech Intelligibility Rating scores found statistically significantly better scores in children with GJB2-related deafness (p < 0.05) both before and after adjustment for confounding variables. A larger proportion with GJB2-related deafness also attended mainstream school (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In pediatric cochlear implantees, GJB2-related deafness is a predictor of good speech intelligibility.     

GJB2及SLC26A4基因突变患儿耳蜗植入效果分析

目的探讨GJB2及SLC26A4基因突变的患儿人工耳蜗植入(cochlear implantation,CI)术后的效果。方法根据耳聋基因检测结果,将40名单侧CI患儿分成3组:GJB2组包括15名GJB2基因突变患儿,SLC26A4组包括8名SLC26A4基因突变患儿,对照组组包括17名未发现GJB2、SLC26A4及线粒体基因突变患儿。术后效果采用听觉意义整合量表(Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale,MAIS)、听觉行为分级标准(Categories of Auditory Performance,CAP)、规范学语时期出现时间、言语可懂度分级标准(Speech Intelligibility Rating,SIR)进行评估,比较3组术后1年效果差异的统计学意义。结果 GJB2基因突变组在MAIS及CAP两项评估中均明显优于其他两组,其差异有统计学意义。GJB2组的规范学语出现时间及SIR相较于另外两组也具有一定优势,但差异无统计学意义。SLC26A4组略优于非基因突变组,尽管统计学分析显示各项评估结果无显著差异。结论因病变部位在耳蜗,GJB2相关性耳聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后效果较好,SLC26A4相关性耳聋术后是否存在优势有待进一步证实。     

GJB2 gene mutations in cochlear implant recipients: prevalence and impact on outcome

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of GJB2 gene mutations in patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) and their impact on rehabilitative outcome following implantation. DESIGN: Prospective determination of GJB2 mutation by sequence analysis by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and its correlation with outcome following CI. SETTINGS: Two tertiary academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Subjects who have met the audiologic criteria and have undergone CI. RESULTS: Of 77 cochlear implant recipients screened, 13 (18%) harbored a detectable sequence alteration in the GJB2 gene. Only 3 of these 13 patients had hearing loss clearly attributable to a biallelic GJB2 mutation. There were 2 patients with homozygous mutations, including a 35delG and a 167delT mutation, and a third with a compound heterozygous mutation. Of the remaining 10 patients, 8 had 1 deafness allele, while 2 had a normal polymorphism that was not believed to be implicated in the hearing loss. Six patients had the common 35delG mutation: 5 patients had heterozygous mutations, which are probably not related to the underlying hearing loss (a second deafness allele cannot be ruled out in these cases because of the screening methodology used), while 1 patient had a homozygous mutation, which was clearly implicated in the patient's deafness. Rehabilitative outcome among those with detectable sequence alterations, as well as the 3 patients with biallelic mutations, varied but were similar on average when compared with outcomes seen in our entire CI population. CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of implant candidates harbor mutations or sequence alterations in the GJB2 gene, although only a small number of these changes are biallelic and a clear cause of the hearing loss. These results demonstrate that patients with GJB2-related deafness clearly benefit from CI.     

GJB2基因突变致聋患儿人工耳蜗植入效果分析

目的 比较GJB2基因突变致聋患儿与非GJB2基因突变且内耳结构正常聋儿人工耳蜗植入术后的听觉言语康复效果.方法 对37例经C下及MRI检查排除内耳畸形的聋儿术前行GJB2基因检查,根据结果 分成A组(GJB2基因突变10例)和B组(非GJB2基因突变27例),术后随访0.5～2年,进行术后的听阈、言语识别率及言语能力评估.结果 37例聋儿人工耳蜗植入手术全部成功,均建立了主观听性反应.A组的声场听阈水平平均为34.41±6.12 dB HL.言语识别率平均为76%; B组的声场听阈水平平均为36.23±4.16 dB HL.言语识别率平均为79%,两组均达到平均言语康复级别二级;两组听觉及言语能力测试结果 均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 人工耳蜗患者中GJB2基因突变率高,可能是内耳结构正常的人工耳蜗植入人群耳聋的主要致聋原因;GJB2基因突变致聋患儿与非GJB2基因突变且内耳结构正常聋儿人工耳蜗植入术后效果基本一致.人工耳蜗植入可作为GJB2基因突变致聋患儿的有效治疗手段.     

Long term speech perception after cochlear implant in pediatric patients with GJB2 mutations

Objectives

To determine the long term effect of cochlear implant (CI) in children with GJB2-related deafness in Japan.

Methods

Genetic testing was performed on 29 children with CI. The speech perception in 9 children with GJB2 gene-related deafness fitted with CI was compared with those in matched 10 children who were diagnosed as having no genetic loci. The average follow-up period after CI was 55.9 months and 54.6 months, respectively.

Results

A definitive inherited hearing impairment could be confirmed in 12 (41.4%) of the 29 CI children, including 10 with GJB2-related hearing impairment and 2 with SLC26A4-related hearing impairment. The results of IT-MAIS, word or speech perception testing under the noise, and development of speech perception and production testing using the Enjoji scale were slightly better for the GJB2 group after CI than for the control group without statistical significant difference.

Conclusion

The long-term results of this study show that CI is also effective in the development of speech performance after CI in Japanese children with GJB2-related hearing impairments as HL due to other etiologies.     

Auditory perception and speech discrimination after cochlear implantation in patients with connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness.

HYPOTHESIS: Auditory perception and speech discrimination among pediatric cochlear implantees may vary because of underlying deafness etiology, including connexin 26 (GJB2) gene-related deafness. BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest pathologic changes due to GJB2 mutations do not affect the spiral ganglion cells, which are stimulated by the cochlear implant. The survival of the spiral ganglion cells is believed to be an important determinant of outcome after surgery. Patients with GJB2-related deafness may therefore have enhanced prospects for good speech discrimination after implantation. METHODS: In an observational cohort study, GJB2 mutation analysis was performed using polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing on 31 prelingually deaf pediatric cochlear implantees, of which there were 30 with nonsyndromic deafness of unknown etiology, and one with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Speech discrmination was assessed prospectively when they had reached postoperative year 3 using the IOWA Matrix Level B Sentences test and Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP), with both patients and assessors blind to GJB2 status. RESULTS: Eleven patients had GJB2-related deafness and 20 patients had GJB2-unrelated deafness. IOWA Matrix scores were higher in patients with GJB2-related deafness but did not reach statistical significance. However, GASP scores were statistically significantly higher in patients with GJB2-related deafness (median word score, 92%; median sentence score, 80%), compared with those of patients with GJB2-unrelated deafness (median word score, 63%; median sentence score, 45%; word score, p = 0.037; sentence score, p = 0.045). Ordinal logistic regression analysis on IOWA Matrix and GASP sentence scores found better statistically significant scores in patients with GJB2-related deafness (p < 0.05) after adjustment for confounding variables. CONCLUSION: Pediatric cochlear implantees with GJB2-related deafness appear to have equal or better speech discrimination compared with a group of prelingually deaf children with deafness of unknown etiology.     

Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether age at cochlear implantation or duration of implant use is associated with speech, language, and reading skills exhibited at age 8 to 9 years in children who underwent implantation by age 5 years. DESIGN: Performance outcomes in speech perception, speech production, language, and reading were examined in terms of the age at which children first received a cochlear implant (2, 3, or 4 years), the age they received an updated (Spectra) processor, and the duration of use of an implant and an updated processor. SETTING: Data collection was conducted at summer research camps held over 4 consecutive years to maximize the number of children available at a specific age (8-9 years). Children were tested individually by experienced examiners, and their parents and therapists provided background and educational history information. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 181 children from 33 different states and 5 Canadian provinces who received a cochlear implant by age 5 years were tested. A subsample of 133 children with performance IQ scores of 80 or greater and onset of deafness at birth were selected for the age-at-implantation analysis. Another subsample of 39 children with deafness acquired by age 3 years was also examined. OUTCOME MEASURES: A battery of tests of speech perception, speech production, language, and reading was administered to each child and reduced to a single factor score for each skill. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between age at implantation and duration of use did not reach significance for any of the outcome skills measured. Age at which the updated speech processor (Spectra) was fitted was significantly related to speech production outcome (earlier use of an updated processor was associated with greater speech intelligibility) but not to any other skill area. However, more of the children who underwent implantation at age 2 years (43%) achieved combined speech and language skills commensurate with their age-matched peers with normal hearing than did children who underwent implantation at age 4 years (16%). Furthermore, normal speech and language skills were documented in 80% of children who lost hearing after birth and who underwent implantation within a year of onset of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: For children who receive a cochlear implant between the ages of 2 and 4 years, early cochlear implantation does not ensure better speech perception, speech production, language, or reading skills. However, greater speech and language proficiency may be expected from children who exhibit normal hearing for even a brief period after birth and receive a cochlear implant shortly after losing their hearing. Further research examining the benefits of cochlear implantation before age 2 years will help families and clinicians better understand the time-sensitive nature of the decision to conduct cochlear implant surgery.     

Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children

OBJECTIVE: Partial deafness cochlear implantation and electric-acoustic stimulation have proven to be a useful method of treating adults with a ski-slope type hearing loss. Good hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes have been reported. This study aims to assess partial deafness cochlear implantation in children. METHOD: Nine children, ranging in age from 4.2 to 12 years, received a cochlear implant following the round window surgical technique for partial deafness cochlear implantation. Hearing preservation was assessed by pure-tone audiometry and speech perception outcomes were measured using monosyllable word tests in quiet and noise. Data are available for most children up to a period of 1 year. RESULTS: Hearing could be preserved partially in all cases, however, one child does not have sufficient preservation to make use of electric-acoustic stimulation. The eight children with sufficiently preserved hearing either use the natural low frequency hearing in combination with a cochlear implant to hear or use the DUET combined hearing system. Speech perception tests showed improvement in quiet and noise over time. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that partial deafness cochlear implantation is a viable treatment method in children. However, surgery should only be conducted by an experienced surgeon and parents need to be carefully counselled about the risks and benefits of partial deafness cochlear implantation.     

Effects of central nervous system residua on cochlear implant results in children deafened by meningitis

BACKGROUND: This study explored factors associated with speech recognition outcomes in postmeningitic deafness (PMD). The results of cochlear implantation may vary in children with PMD because of sequelae that extend beyond the auditory periphery. OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors might be most determinative of outcome of cochlear implantation in children with PMD. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A referral center for pediatric cochlear implantation and rehabilitation. SUBJECTS: Thirty children with cochlear implants who were deafened by meningitis were matched with subjects who were deafened by other causes based on the age at diagnosis, age at cochlear implantation, age at which hearing aids were first used, and method of communication used at home or in the classroom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Speech perception performance within the first 2 years after cochlear implantation and its relationship with presurgical cognitive measures and medical history. RESULTS: There was no difference in the overall cognitive or postoperative speech perception performance between the children with PMD and those deafened by other causes. The presence of postmeningitic hydrocephalus, however, posed greater challenges to the rehabilitation process, as indicated by significantly smaller gains in speech perception and a predilection for behavioral problems. By comparison, cochlear scarring and incomplete electrode insertion had no impact on speech perception results. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results demonstrated no significant delay in cognitive or speech perception performance in the PMD group, central nervous system residua, when present, can impede the acquisition of speech perception with a cochlear implant. Central effects associated with PMD may thus impact language learning potential; cognitive and behavioral therapy should be considered in rehabilitative planning and in establishing expectations of outcome.     

Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users

OBJECTIVE: To compare the communication outcomes between children with aided residual hearing and children with cochlear implants. DESIGN: Measures of speech recognition and language were administered to pediatric hearing aid users and cochlear implant users followed up longitudinally as part of an ongoing investigation on cochlear implant outcomes. The speech recognition measures included the Lexical Neighborhood Test, Phonetically Balanced-Kindergarten Word Lists, and the Hearing in Noise Test for Children presented in quiet and noise (+5 dB signal-to-noise ratio). Language measures included the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test: Third Edition (PPVT-III), the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, and the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Revised.Subjects The experimental group was composed of 39 pediatric hearing aid users with a mean unaided pure-tone average threshold of 78.2 dB HL (hearing level). The comparison group was composed of 117 pediatric cochlear implant users with a mean unaided pure-tone average threshold of 110.2 dB HL. On average, both groups lost their hearing at younger than 1 year and were fitted with their respective sensory aids at 2 to 2.6 years of age. Not every child was administered every test for a variety of reasons. RESULTS: Between-group performance was equivalent on most speech recognition and language measures. The primary difference found between groups was on the PPVT-III, in which the hearing aid group had a significantly higher receptive vocabulary language quotient than the cochlear implant group. Notably, the cochlear implant group was substantially younger than the hearing aid group and had less experience with their sensory devices on this measure. CONCLUSION: Data obtained from children with aided residual hearing can be useful in determining cochlear implant candidacy.     

The effect of GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutations on rehabilitative outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patients

To analyze the treatment outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patients with mutations in GJB2 or SLC26A4 and to determine these mutations’ impact on rehabilitative outcomes. The study included 41 children who received unilateral cochlear implantations. Fifteen of these children had GJB2-related deafness, 10 had SLC26A4-related deafness, and 16 had deafness of unknown etiology. Speech perception and language development evaluations, including the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and babbling spurt, were conducted before and after the implantation. Better results for the GJB2 group (vs. the control group) were observed regarding MAIS, CAP and SIR at 24 months after implantation (P < 0.05). The performance of GJB2 group was better than SLC26A4 group, expressed by a significant difference in the variance of CAP and SIR at 24 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). A trend towards earlier babbling spurt onset could be observed for the GJB2 group, intergroup comparison did not reveal any significant difference among the three groups (P > 0.05). The SLC26A4 group performed better than the control group at 12 and 24 months postoperatively, although without a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The GJB2 gene mutations had a significantly positive impact on the outcome of cochlear implantation. Patients with SLC26A4-related deafness were shown to benefit from cochlear implantation.     

Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance after cochlear implantation in children with mutations in connexin (Cx) 26 (GJB2) or Cx30 (GJB6) and children with deafness of unknown etiology. DESIGN: Genetic analysis and speech perception evaluation was performed in the children with and without Cx mutations who had undergone cochlear implantation. Speech perception performance was retrospectively analyzed 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after implantation. Test material was selected according to the child's age and cognitive and language abilities. SETTING: The study took place at speech and hearing and genetic centers of a hospital in the central part of Israel and the genetics departments of 3 additional centrally located hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 30 children who had undergone cochlear implantation were selected for the study, with control patients matched according to age at implantation, duration of implant use, and mode of communication. There was no evidence for additional disabilities or handicaps in either group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measurements included a questionnaire, as well as closed and open-set tests. RESULTS: Overall, the 2 groups showed significant improvement in speech perception results after implantation. Four years after implantation, both groups achieved mean open-set speech perception scores of approximately 60%, 75%, and 90% for monosyllabic, 2 syllables, and words in sentences tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were no apparent differences in speech perception performance after implantation between the children with Cx mutations and children with deafness of unknown etiology. These data have important implications as a prognostic indicator when counseling candidates for cochlear implantation.     

Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children

This study investigated the effects of age at time of testing, hearing history (age at hearing loss) and hearing status on melody recognition. Four groups were compared: children with normal hearing thresholds, and three groups of cochlear implant recipients (children with prelingual deafness, children with postlingual deafness, adults with postlingual deafness). Participants were tested for recognition of familiar melodies (no lyrics) in a closed-set task. Groups differed in accuracy in the following rank order (most to least accurate): children with normal hearing thresholds, adult cochlear implant recipients, children with postlingual deafness, children with prelingual deafness. Melody recognition scores were correlated with age, variables regarding hearing history, musical background/experience and speech perception scores.     

GJB2 mutations and additional disabilities in a pediatric cochlear implant population

BACKGROUND: Children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss due to GJB2 mutations have often been deemed good cochlear implant candidates. Studies on children with GJB2 mutations and cochlear implants have typically excluded children with additional disabilities. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of additional disabilities among children with and without GJB2 mutations in a cochlear implant population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of children with non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who received a cochlear implant between 1993 and 2004. RESULTS: Among 108 children within the cochlear implant database; 46 patients met the inclusion criteria of idiopathic non-syndromic hearing loss. Sixteen children had GJB2 mutations, 12 were GJB2 negative, and 17 did not receive GJB2 testing but had no other identifiable etiology or risk factor contributing to hearing loss. The proportion of children with additional disabilities that would affect either pre-operative assessments or post-operative results in the GJB2 positive group was 44% compared to 33% of children in the GJB2 negative. Additional disabilities were present in 41% of the children who did not receive GJB2 testing. The disabilities in the GJB2 positive group included specific learning disability, apraxia, epileptiform aphasia, attention deficit disorder, global developmental delay, and gross motor delay. The GJB2 negative and those children not receiving GJB2 testing had motor delays, language delay, autism, specific learning disability, and attention deficit disorder. The proportion of children with at least 6 months CI use who relied on oral communication was 62% in the GJB2 positive group, 66% in the GJB2 negative group, and 38% in the untested group. A majority of the genetic alleles were 35delG (81%) and 10 of 16 (63%) patients with GJB2 mutations were homozygous 35delG. The rate of developmental diagnoses was similar in patients with homozygous GJB2 compared to compound heterozygous genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of biallelic GJB2 mutations does not rule out non-hearing related disorders that can have an effect on speech, language and learning. Forty-four percent of children with GJB2 mutations had other conditions that could directly affect pre-implant evaluation and post-implant performance. This rate is similar to the reported prevalence among the overall population of children with hearing loss. All children should have a comprehensive evaluation of development and behavior regardless of the etiology of hearing loss.     

Successful cochlear implantation in prelingual profound deafness resulting from the common 233delC mutation of the GJB2 gene in the Japanese

OBJECTIVES: Recently, we identified three novel mutations of the GJB2 gene in Japanese families with autosomal-recessive non-syndromic deafness.1 Seven of 11 mutated chromosomes (63.6%) contained a 233delC allele, suggesting that the 233delC mutation is the most common mutation of the GJB2 gene in the Japanese population. After it was recognized that cochlear implantation (CI) is of benefit to children with prelingual deafness, we have had a number of prelingual pediatric CI patients. Because children carrying the homozygous 233delC mutation show bilateral prelingual profound deafness, they could be enrolled in the CI program at Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine. The purposes of this study were 1) to analyze the occurrence of the GJB2 mutations in our 15 prelingual pediatric CI patients in whom the cause of non-syndromic deafness was unknown, and 2) to evaluate the auditory function and postoperative speech perception with CI of those GJB2-related deaf subjects. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. METHODS: Mutation analysis of the GJB2 gene by direct sequencing was performed with genomic DNA from 15 children born profoundly deaf as a result of unknown causes and implanted with CI. Intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) and intra-/postoperative EAP were measured. The speech perception was evaluated with Infants and Toddlers Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified 4 CI patients (26.7%) out of 15 children carrying the homozygous 233delC mutation. Intra- and postoperative evaluation of the auditory system revealed almost intact cochlear and retrocochlear auditory function in these 4 patients. Postoperative auditory testing indicates that their speech perception had become significantly higher in comparison with that of other prelingual CI patients. These results suggest that prelingual deaf children carrying the homozygous 233delC mutation of the GJB2 gene can benefit from CI.     

Examining multiple sources of influence on the reading comprehension skills of children who use cochlear implants.

Children with profound deafness are at risk for serious reading difficulties. Multiple factors affect their development of reading skills, including use of cochlear implants. Further, multiple factors influence the overall success that children experience with their cochlear implants. These factors include the age at which they receive an implant, method of communication, vocabulary skills, preoperative residual hearing, and socioeconomic status. Ninety-one children with prelingual and profound hearing impairments who received cochlear implants at varying ages participated in the study. Structural equation modeling confirmed that multiple factors affected young cochlear implant users' reading comprehension skills and that there were significant associations between the predictors of reading comprehension. Pre-implant vocabulary had an indirect positive effect on reading through postimplant vocabulary, which had a direct positive effect on reading. Overall, children with stronger language skills demonstrated stronger reading outcomes. Age at implantation both directly and indirectly, through postimplant vocabulary, affected reading outcomes, and the total effect was large. Children who were younger when they received their implants tended to have higher reading comprehension scores. Socioeconomic status negatively affected reading. Children who used total communication prior to implantation tended to have stronger pre-implant vocabulary scores, but the total effect of pre-implant communication method on children's reading skills was negligible. Research and educational implications are discussed.