复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例分析

目的 分析应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的临床效果，讨论应用复合补片的手术方法和经验体会。方法 1999年5月～2005年5月应用复合切口疝补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝30例，其中皮下置片法12例，腹腔内法18例。平均随访期36个月。结果 术后复发2例，占6．7％。切口并发症33．3％，切口感染5例，均为皮下法；皮下积液5例，其中皮下法3例，腹腔内法2例。结论 腹壁巨大切口疝，特别是传统法难以修补的，可应用聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯复合补片修补。应用腹腔内法及正确的术中、术后处理可减少术后并发症的发生。     

复合人工补片治疗腹壁切口疝25例体会

目的探讨复合人工补片治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效。方法回顾性分25例腹壁切口疝应用复合人工补片治疗的临床资料。结果本组25例均治愈,1例发生皮下脂肪液化感染,3例切口疼痛不适,经保守治疗后痊愈。术后均获随访6个月~3年。未出现复发病例。结论重视围手术期的处理对防治腹壁切口疝有重要作用,应用复合人工补片治疗腹壁切口疝安全性高,术后并发症少。复发率低,效果肯定。     

人工补片修补腹壁切口疝35例临床疗效分析

目的:探讨利用人工材料修补腹壁切口疝的疗效.方法:回顾性分析我院2000～2008年间收治的35例病人的临床资料.结果:所有病例均采用人工补片行切口疝无张力修补术,均痊愈出院,无严重并发症.随访6～60个月,平均28个月,无复发,疗效满意.结论:应用人工补片行腹壁切口疝修补术是一种安全、合理、疗效确切的治疗方法,也是治疗该病的发展方向.     

开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝治疗经验。方法对我院采用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术的51例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用肌前补片修补法3例,肌肉间补片修补法3例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法39例,腹腔内补片修补法6例。手术时间109~195 min,平均135.2 min;术中出血15~90 ml,平均35.6 ml;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症。术后3~7 d(平均4.9 d)下床活动;住院时间7~19 d,平均9.7 d。2例患者术后出现浆液肿,经穿刺抽吸、负压吸引和腹带加压包扎后治愈。51例患者随访12~36个月(平均24.5个月),3例(5.9%)患者复发,后行开放式腹腔内补片修补手术,恢复良好,无再复发。所有病例无慢性疼痛。结论应用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全、可靠的方法,复发率低。     

应用聚丙烯和e-PTFE复合补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝

目的回顾性分析应用聚丙烯和e鄄PTFE复合补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的效果,介绍腹腔内应用复合补片的方法和经验。方法1999年5月至2003年12月应用复合补片修补腹膜难以对合的腹壁巨大缺损22例,其中补片置于皮下12例,腹腔内10例。平均随访期39个月。结果手术后切口并发症的发生率为41%(9/22),1例修补术后复发,占4.6%。应用皮下法发生切口感染3例,其中1例因严重感染而将补片取出;切口处皮下积液2例。应用腹腔内法者中仅2例发生切口皮下少量积液。结论腹壁巨大切口疝,特别是难以关闭腹膜的病例,可应用聚丙烯和e鄄PTFE复合补片进行修补。应用腹腔内置补片法并辅以正确的术后处理可使局部并发症明显减少。     

复合补片修补腹壁切口疝四例

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科手术后常见的并发症,疝修补手术的难度、并发症和复发率都较高[1-2]。我科对4例腹壁切口疝患者采用复合型补片行腹腔内无张力修补术。     

巴德补片修补腹壁切口疝的应用与护理

采用人工合成材料行无张力疝修术是我国近几年来发展起来的一种有效治疗方法。我科自2001年元月-2004年12月对24例腹壁切口疝采用巴德补片行疝修补术,取得满意效果。现将有关护理报告如下:1临床资料1.1一般资料:本组24例中,男性10例,女性14例,年龄在57~77岁,平均年龄67岁。前次手术方法如下:上腹部手术7例(胆道手术5例,脾切除1例,肝右叶切除1例)。下腹部手术17例(子宫切除术5例,前列腺摘除1例,肠切肠吻合术4例,膀胱部分切除术1例,剖腹探查术2例,阑尾切除术4例);复发性疝6例,其中3例为2次手术失败复发。复发时间:最短为3个月,最长11年。1.2治…     

应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝26例报告

目的 总结补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的临床经验。方法回顾性分析2001年6月至2005年5月上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院诊治的26例巨大腹壁切口疝的临床资料。结果26例均痊愈出院．无心肺衰竭等严重并发症。无复发。结论补片修补术是治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的理想方法。     

补片修补切口疝

虽然有像Mudge和Hughes报告一个 10年的随访研究提示仅仅 1/ 3的手术切口疝出现症状和需要手术治疗 ,但手术切口疝嵌顿的发生率是 6%～ 15 % ,绞窄的发生率是 2 %。而且 ,手术切口疝具有明显的向病情加重发展和复发的趋势 ,尤其在年老、病态性肥胖和多次手术的病人。明确诊断后     

补片修补及皮下负压引流治疗巨大腹壁切口疝

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科常见疾病 ,尤其是巨大腹壁切口疝的治疗较棘手。我们采用补片修补皮下负压引流治疗巨大腹壁切口疝 ,疗效满意。报道如下。一、临床资料自 1996年 1月至 2 0 0 0年 12月 ,我们采用皮下负压引流补片修补治疗腹壁巨大切口疝 12例。男性 5例 ,女性 7例 ,年龄 3 5～ 81岁 ,平均年龄 68岁。疝囊最小直径为 5ｃｍ ,最大直径达 2 2ｃｍ。12例病人均有手术史 ,手术类型见表 1,12例病人均有合并症 ,见表 2。麻醉后 ,将原手术瘢痕切除 ,切开皮肤皮下组织 ,向四周游离皮下组织至肌鞘 ,距肌鞘边缘 4ｃｍ。切开疝囊 ,游离疝囊与腹腔内…     

Use of polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair

Incisional hernia is an important complication of abdominal surgery. Procedures for the repair of these hernias with sutures and with mesh have been reported, but there is no consensus about which type of procedure is best. We have performed a retrospective analysis on 1014 patients operated on in our unit between 1994 and 2003 for simple or recurrent incisional hernias. The polypropylene mesh has been used in a number of 107 patients. The mesh has been placed either intraperitoneal, extraperitoneal/subfascial or onlay. Median follow-up was 36 months. There were 1 enterocutaneous fistula and 5 wound sinus developed. The mesh had to be removed in 6 cases. All of these complication developed when the mesh has been placed either extraperitoneal/subfascial or onlay. We note 5 recurrent incisional hernias after a period of up to 24 months. The recurrence rates after open mesh repair are less then after primary closure. The intraperitoneal use of polypropylene mesh with omental coverage is a good procedure with less complications.     

Sutureless mesh fibrin glue incisional hernia repair

Purpose  

The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of sutureless incisional open hernia repair with mesh fixation only using a fibrin glue sealant.     

Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Polymer mesh has been used to repair incisional hernias with lower recurrence rates than suture repair. A new generation of mesh has been developed with reduced polypropylene mass and increased pore size. The aim of this study was to compare standard mesh with new lightweight mesh in patients undergoing incisional hernia repair. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive lightweight composite mesh, or standard polyester or polypropylene mesh. Outcomes were evaluated at 21 days, 4, 12 and 24 months from patient responses to the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and daily activity questionnaires. Complications and recurrence rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis (83 lightweight mesh, 82 standard mesh). Postoperative complication rates were similar. The overall hernia recurrence rate was 17 per cent with the lightweight mesh versus 7 per cent with the standard mesh (P = 0.052). There were no differences in SF-36 physical function scores or daily activities between 21 days and 24 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of the lightweight composite mesh for incisional hernia repair had similar outcomes to polypropylene or polyester mesh with the exception of a non-significant trend towards increased hernia recurrence. The latter may be related to technical factors with regard to the specific placement and fixation requirements of lightweight composite mesh.     

Simplified technique for incisional hernia repair with mesh prosthesis

This paper describes a simplified technique for the repair of incisional hernias. The previous scar is resected, and the peritoneal sac is carefully dissected until it is completely exposed. The sac is opened to liberate structures adherent to the sac or to the area immediately surrounding the defect. The peritoneum is closed and invaginated to form a sac bed underlying the entire extent of the defect, and the mesh is laid on this sac bed. The mesh is then fixed with "U" stitches, reinforcing these by inserting a second line from the edge of the defect to the mesh. Suture material used is polypropylene 1/0 or 2/0. This procedure has been carried out on 15 patients, and after 1 year of follow-up, there has been no recurrence of the hernia. Operating time was reduced, and the surgical technique was found to be easier. Placing a mesh prosthesis inside the hernia sac and fixing it to the abdominal wall with two lines of suturing simplifies the repair procedure, reduces operating time, and is effective in the repair of all incisional hernias. A study is required to compare this outcome with the different mesh repair techniques.     

Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair

Background

Ventral hernia can be repaired through either an open or laparoscopic approach. A major problem following hernia repair is recurrence, and the technique used for hernia repair influences the rate of hernia recurrence. Data from individual studies show that the area of mesh overlap used during hernia repair correlates with hernia recurrence, but no meta-analyses have previously been published. The aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis to determine if the area of mesh overlap correlates with the rate of hernia recurrence after ventral and incisional hernia repair.

Methods

Studies from 1990 to 2013 that used a mesh in open or laparoscopic procedures, and that reported both the area of mesh overlap beyond the fascial defect and the recurrence rate, were assessed for inclusion in the final analysis. A pooled estimation of combined overall risk was calculated according to a random effect model.

Results

A total of 95 articles, with 111 study populations, met all criteria and were included in the final analysis. For open procedures, results showed no correlation between the pooled estimation of risk for recurrence of ventral hernia and area of mesh overlap used for hernia repair (<3 cm, incidence rate 0.065; 3–5 cm, incidence rate 0.070; >5 cm, incidence rate 0.060). In laparoscopic procedures, the pooled estimation of risk for recurrence of hernia decreased with increasing area of mesh overlap (<3 cm, incidence rate 0.086; 3–5 cm, incidence rate 0.046; >5 cm, incidence rate 0.014).

Conclusion

Risk of hernia recurrence decreases with increasing area of mesh overlap in laparoscopic, but not open, procedures for ventral hernia repair.

     

Predictors of mesh explantation after incisional hernia repair

Background

Prosthetic mesh used for incisional hernia repair (IHR) reduces hernia recurrence. Mesh infection results in significant morbidity and challenges for subsequent abdominal wall reconstruction. The risk factors that lead to mesh explantation are not well known.

Methods

This is a multisite cohort study of patients undergoing IHR at 16 Veterans Affairs hospitals from 1998 to 2002.

Results

Of the 1,071 mesh repairs, 55 (5.1%) had subsequent mesh explantation at a median of 7.3 months (interquartile range 1.4–22.2) after IHR with permanent mesh prosthesis. Infection was the most common reason for explantation (69%). No differences were observed by the type of repair. Adjusting for covariates, same-site concomitant surgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.3) and postoperative surgical site infection (HR = 6.5) were associated with mesh explantation.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing IHR with concomitant intra-abdominal procedures have a greater than 6-fold increased hazard of subsequent mesh explantation. Permanent prosthetic mesh should be used with caution in this setting.     

Intraluminal migration of mesh following incisional hernia repair

Incisional hernia is the most common long term complication of colon surgery. These hernias are often repaired with synthetic mesh. Mesh migration is an infrequent occurrence. There are reports of mesh migrating into the peritoneum and into viscous organs causing a variety of symptoms including recurrent hernia, infection, and obstruction. We present the case of transmural mesh migration from the abdominal wall into the small bowel presenting as small bowel obstruction.     

应用合成补片修补腹壁切口疝的经验总结

目的:探讨腹壁切口疝病人的无张力手术治疗方法和疗效.方法:回顾性分析我院2000年7月至2008年6月间收治的215例应用合成补片修补腹壁切口疝病人的临床资料.结果:215例中101例采用IPOM方法,有1例复发,复发率0.99%;97例采用Stoppa方法,有3例复发,复发率3.09%;17例采用肌前修补法,有3例复发,复发率17.6%.在21例复发疝病人中,16例采用了IPOM方法,无再复发病例;5例采用了Stoppa方法,有1例再复发,复发率20%.结论:IPOM方法和Stoppa方法的手术适应症宽、复发率低.IPOM方法对于复发的切口疝病人有更好的治疗效果.术者的经验和方法的正确性对修补的成功均有重要意义.