Multiple auditory steady-state responses in children and adults with normal hearing, sensorineural hearing loss, or auditory neuropathy

OBJECTIVES: We tested the clinical effectiveness of multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) for the objective assessment of hearing thresholds in patients with and without hearing loss, candidates for cochlear implants, and children with auditory neuropathy. METHODS: The study sample included 29 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), 18 candidates for cochlear implants, 11 subjects with auditory neuropathy, and 18 subjects with normal hearing thresholds. Behavioral hearing thresholds and ASSRs to carrier frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were obtained. Special care was taken to minimize possible aliasing and high-intensity multiple stimulation effects. Differences and correlations between the ASSRs and the behavioral thresholds were determined. RESULTS: The ASSR estimation of behavioral thresholds in the normal-hearing group was elevated, whereas very close predictions were found for the SNHL group. The correlations between the two measures ranged from 0.86 at 0.5 kHz carrier frequency to 0.94 at 2 kHz. In the cochlear implant candidates and the auditory neuropathy group, the ASSR thresholds generally overestimated the behavioral audiogram. In these groups the number of detected ASSRs was higher than the number of behavioral responses, especially for the high-frequency carrier stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple ASSRs may reliably predict the behavioral threshold in subjects with SNHL and may serve as a valuable objective measure for assessing the hearing threshold across different frequencies in candidates for cochlear implants and children with auditory neuropathy.     

Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds and behavioral thresholds in hearing-impaired adults with two common audiometric configurations. A second goal was to compare suprathreshold ASSR growth functions in these two subject groups and to determine whether these growth functions could be used clinically to improve threshold estimation. DESIGN: Thirty adults participated, including 10 subjects with normal hearing, 10 subjects with flat moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss, and 10 subjects with sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. The accuracy of ASSR threshold estimations for the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz was compared across groups. In addition, ASSRs were recorded at multiple suprathreshold intensity levels, and the growth of the response was compared across subject groups. RESULTS: ASSR and behavioral thresholds were strongly correlated across all subjects, with no significant difference by audiometric configuration. Slightly poorer correlations were obtained in the normal-hearing subjects than in hearing-impaired subjects and for the 500-Hz test frequency compared with the higher stimulus frequencies. Subtraction and regression methods for predicting behavioral thresholds from ASSR thresholds were equally accurate. Suprathreshold amplitude growth was variable among individuals, but mean growth functions showed steeper slopes in hearing-impaired subjects than in normal-hearing subjects, particularly for the higher frequencies (2000 to 4000 Hz). However, there was not a significant difference in the slopes of amplitude growth functions between subjects with sloping versus flat audiometric configurations for these frequencies, and estimation of threshold from suprathreshold ASSR amplitude growth functions was not advantageous. CONCLUSIONS: ASSR thresholds accurately predicted behavioral threshold equally well for flat or sloping audiometric configurations. The accuracy of threshold estimation for either audiometric configuration and the similar growth function slopes may suggest that there is little spread of activation to neighboring regions of the cochlea when using multiple 100% AM stimuli in subjects with moderately sloping losses. The small amplitude of the ASSR response and individual variability may make threshold estimation based on extrapolation from suprathreshold ASSR responses impractical.     

Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials

This retrospective study examines the relationship between auditory steady-state evoked potential (ASSEP) thresholds determined in infancy and subsequently obtained behavioral hearing levels in children with normal hearing or varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Overall, the results from 211 subjects showed that the two test techniques were highly correlated, with Pearson r values exceeding .95 at each of the audiometric test frequencies between 500 and 4000 Hz. Analysis of the findings for babies with significant hearing loss (moderate to profound levels) showed similar threshold relationships to those obtained in previous studies involving adults and older children. The results for infants with normal or near-normal hearing did, however, differ from those reported for older subjects, with behavioral thresholds typically 10 to 15 dB better than would have been predicted from their ASSEP levels.     

Threshold estimation in children using auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli

OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to explore the use of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) to multiple simultaneous stimuli for threshold estimation in young children. METHOD: The subjects consisted of 40 children, aged from 6 months to 5 years, with variant degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Simultaneous tonepips (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) with an amplitude modulated at different rates from 77 to 103 Hz were presented to both ears by insert phones. All children were tested with ASSR and age-appropriate behavioral tests. RESULTS: We found that (1) ASSR thresholds were usually higher than behavioral thresholds with a difference of 8-15 dB, (2) the behavioral thresholds were significantly correlated with ASSR thresholds (p = 0.000), and (3) there was a great difference between ASSR thresholds and behavioral thresholds found in a child with auditory neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Being objective, frequency specific and well correlated with behavioral thresholds, ASSR to multiple simultaneous stimuli was proven to be a good tool to predict behavioral hearing thresholds.     

Relationship between behavioral hearing thresholds and estimated auditory steady-state response thresholds in children with a history of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

Increased serum bilirubin levels during infancy increase the risk of hearing loss in infants. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pure-tone audiometry hearing thresholds and thresholds estimated using auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in children with a history of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and to evaluate the usefulness of 90-Hz ASSR in estimating hearing thresholds in children. This study was conducted on 26 children (13 girls and 13 boys) who were aged 2.4–11 years and had a history of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (bilirubin level >17 mg/dL). ASSR thresholds were compared with behavioral thresholds and were interpreted after considering the amount and type of hearing loss. Of the 26 children, 12 had normal hearing thresholds, and 14 had varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. In general, a high correlation (r ≥ 0.81, p < 0.01) was found between the ASSR and behavioral thresholds. The highest correlation was observed at 2,000 Hz (r = 0.88, p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed (p > 0.13) between mean behavioral and ASSR thresholds at 52 studied ears. The results of this study showed that 90-Hz ASSR assessments provide reliable estimates of behavioral hearing thresholds in children who have a history of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and sensorineural hearing loss or normal hearing.     

The auditory steady state response in individuals with neurological insult of the central auditory nervous system

The auditory steady state response (ASSR) has recently gained attention with respect to estimates of hearing sensitivity and configuration of hearing loss. The present investigation compared behavioral thresholds to estimated ASSR thresholds in subjects with confirmed CANS lesions to determine if this population can be accurately evaluated with ASSR techniques. Comparisons were made between the experimental group and a normal control group matched for age and hearing sensitivity. ASSR thresholds were obtained for the carrier frequencies of 500 and 2000 Hz with a 46 Hz modulation rate and compared to behavioral thresholds. Within and between group comparisons were made. The control group demonstrated strong correlation between their behavioral and estimated ASSR thresholds which significantly contrasted the neurological group. Additionally, individuals with neurological impairment of the CANS exhibited elevated thresholds that were on average 24 dB greater at 2000 Hz than their behavioral thresholds. These results suggest that individuals with neurological insult may appear as hearing impaired or having greater hearing loss than is actually present. As a result, the ASSR may demonstrate the potential to assist in the detection of CANS dysfunction.     

A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects

Evoked potential thresholds using the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) were recorded at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz test frequencies in 36 subjects with normal acuity, and 30 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. ASSR threshold sensation levels (SLs) were lower in ears with greater degrees of hearing loss, and for the 500 Hz stimulus. Mean SLs (maximum duration of a single recording: 89 seconds) were as follows at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz respectively: normal hearing group, 16.9+/-10.3 dB and 42.4+/-14.4 dB; mild-moderate group, 10.6+/-8.8 dB and 23.8+/-8.1 dB; severe-profound group, 10.0+/-13.2 dB and 21.5+/-18.9 dB. CAEP SLs showed no change with hearing level and CAEP/behavioural differences were similar at each test frequency. Mean SLs for CAEP threshold (single recording duration: 84 seconds) at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz respectively were: normal hearing group, 10.3+/-6.4 dB and 11.5+/-3.8 dB; mild-moderate group, 8.4+/-7.4 dB and 13.2+/-12.4 dB; severe-profound group, 11.0+/-6.6 dB and 15.9+/-16.4 dB. The results of this study suggest that while both 40 Hz ASSR and CAEP can reflect the behavioural audiogram, CAEPs may provide a more reliable estimate of hearing in awake adults.     

Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical usefulness of the dichotic single-frequency auditory steady-state response (ASSR) for estimation of behavioral thresholds in children with severe to profound congenital sensorineural hearing loss. DESIGN: A comparative experimental research design was selected to compare behavioral and ASSR thresholds for the sample. Behavioral pure-tone audiometry served as the criterion standard. SETTING: Hearing Clinic, Department of Communication Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. PATIENTS: A referred sample of 10 patients (20 ears), 5 girls and 5 boys aged 10 to 15 years (mean age, 13 years 4 months), with severe to profound sensorineural hearing impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The difference, and correlation, between 160 pure-tone behavioral and ASSR thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. RESULTS: Mean differences between ASSR and behavioral thresholds were 6 dB for 0.5 kHz and 4 dB for 1, 2, and 4 kHz, with standard deviations varying between 8 and 12 dB. No significant differences (P<.05) were observed between ASSR and behavioral thresholds, except at 0.5 kHz, and Pearson correlation coefficients varied between 0.58 and 0.74 across the evaluated frequencies, with best correlation at 1 kHz and worst at 0.5 kHz. CONCLUSIONS: The ASSR thresholds provided reliable estimations of behavioral thresholds for children with severe to profound hearing loss and indicated an increased sensitivity for more profound hearing loss.     

听性稳态反应和短声诱发的听性脑干反应在客观听阈评估中的作用

目的探讨听性稳态反应(auditory steady-state responses,ASSR)和短声诱发听性脑干反应(ABR)在感音神经性聋人群客观听阈评估中的作用及其在耳聋鉴定中的价值。方法对感音神经性聋组(35耳)及正常组(22耳)分别进行纯音听阈、ABR及ASSR测试,并记录0.5、1、2及4kHz ASSR反应阈(dBHL)、纯音听阈(dBHL)及ABR反应阈(dBnHL)。结果正常组在0.5、1、2、4kHz的ASSR反应阈与纯音听阈相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),ABR反应阈与各频率纯音听阈差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.05);耳聋组各频率ASSR反应阈与纯音听阈差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),ABR反应阈与0.5kHz纯音听阈差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与1、2、4kHz纯音听阈差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论ASSR与ABR联合测试是临床工作中用于客观听阈评估的有效方法。     

A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects

Evoked potential thresholds using the 40?Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) were recorded at 500?Hz and 4000?Hz test frequencies in 36 subjects with normal acuity, and 30 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. ASSR threshold sensation levels (SLs) were lower in ears with greater degrees of hearing loss, and for the 500?Hz stimulus. Mean SLs (maximum duration of a single recording: 89 seconds) were as follows at 500?Hz and 4000?Hz respectively: normal hearing group, 16.9±10.3?dB and 42.4±14.4?dB; mild-moderate group, 10.6±8.8?dB and 23.8±8.1?dB; severe-profound group, 10.0±13.2?dB and 21.5±18.9?dB. CAEP SLs showed no change with hearing level and CAEP/behavioural differences were similar at each test frequency. Mean SLs for CAEP threshold (single recording duration: 84 seconds) at 500?Hz and 4000?Hz respectively were: normal hearing group, 10.3±6.4?dB and 11.5±3.8?dB; mild-moderate group, 8.4±7.4?dB and 13.2±12.4?dB; severe-profound group, 11.0±6.6?dB and 15.9±16.4?dB. The results of this study suggest that while both 40?Hz ASSR and CAEP can reflect the behavioural audiogram, CAEPs may provide a more reliable estimate of hearing in awake adults.     

Evaluation of residual hearing in cochlear implants candidates using auditory steady-state response

Conclusion: The correlations between behavioral and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds were significant at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. ASSR presented high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of residual hearing in cochlear implant candidates when compared with warble-tone audiometry. Objectives: To assess residual hearing in cochlear implant candidates by comparing the electrophysiological thresholds obtained in dichotic single-frequency ASSR with behavioral thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Methods: This was a comparative study between ASSR and warble-tone audiometry thresholds in 40 cochlear implant candidates (80 ears) before cochlear implantation with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Results: Thresholds were obtained in 62.5% of all frequencies evaluated in warble-tone audiometry and in 63.1% in the ASSR. ASSR sensitivity was 96% and specificity was 91.6%. Mean differences between behavioral and ASSR thresholds did not reach significance at any frequencies. Strong correlations between behavioral and ASSR thresholds were observed in 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz and moderate in 4000 Hz, with correlation coefficients varying from 0.65 to 0.81. On 90% of occasions, ASSR thresholds were acquired within 10 dB of behavioral thresholds.     

Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy with which auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and tone burst auditory brain stem response (ABR) thresholds predict behavioral thresholds, using a within-subjects design. Because the spectra of the stimuli used to evoke the ABR and the ASSR differ, it was hypothesized that the predictive accuracy also would differ, particularly in subjects with steeply sloping hearing losses. DESIGN: ASSR and ABR thresholds were recorded in a group of 14 adults with normal hearing, 10 adults with flat, sensorineural hearing losses, and 10 adults with steeply sloping, high-frequency, sensorineural hearing losses. Evoked-potential thresholds were recorded at 1, 1.5, and 2 kHz and were compared with behavioral, pure-tone thresholds. The predictive accuracy of two ABR protocols was evaluated: Blackman-gated tone bursts and linear-gated tone bursts presented in a background of notched noise. Two ASSR stimulation protocols also were evaluated: 100% amplitude-modulated (AM) sinusoids and 100% AM plus 25% frequency-modulated (FM) sinusoids. RESULTS: The results suggested there was no difference in the accuracy with which either ABR protocol predicted behavioral threshold, nor was there any difference in the predictive accuracy of the two ASSR protocols. On average, ABR thresholds were recorded 3 dB closer to behavioral threshold than ASSR thresholds. However, in the subjects with the most steeply sloping hearing losses, ABR thresholds were recorded as much as 25 dB below behavioral threshold, whereas ASSR thresholds were never recorded more than 5 dB below behavioral threshold, which may reflect more spread of excitation for the ABR than for the ASSR. In contrast, the ASSR overestimated behavioral threshold in two subjects with normal hearing, where the ABR provided a more accurate prediction of behavioral threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Both the ABR and the ASSR provided reasonably accurate predictions of behavioral threshold across the three subject groups. There was no evidence that the predictive accuracy of the ABR evoked using Blackman-gated tone bursts differed from the predictive accuracy observed when linear-gated tone bursts were presented in conjunction with notched noise. Similarly, there was no evidence that the predictive accuracy of the AM ASSR differed from the AM/FM ASSR. In general, ABR thresholds were recorded at levels closer to behavioral threshold than the ASSR. For certain individuals with steeply sloping hearing losses, the ASSR may be a more accurate predictor of behavioral thresholds; however, the ABR may be a more appropriate choice when predicting behavioral thresholds in a population where the incidence of normal hearing is expected to be high.     

多频稳态诱发电位评估中度感音神经性聋儿童的应用

目的探讨多频稳态听觉诱发电位评估儿童中度感音神经性聋的可靠性。方法所有患者经纯音测听（PTA）检查筛选出中度感音神经性聋30例5～6岁儿童（共40耳），然后口服10％水合氯醛镇静睡眠后，行多频稳态听觉诱发电位（ASSR）检测，其阈值与纯音听阂阈值进行比较，分析不同频率处听力阈值分布情况及其相关性。结果分别比较语言频率ASSR阂值与纯音听闽阈值，结果显示，0．5kHz处相关性较差，其差值为2-18dB，而在4kHz处相关性最好。结论可以应用多频稳态听觉诱发电位评估中度感音神经性聋儿童的听力阈值，但需要注意0．5kHz处的相关性差异。     

Correlations between audiogram and objective hearing tests in sensorineural hearing loss

Owing to its subjective nature, behavioral pure-tone audiometry often is an unreliable testing method in uncooperative subjects, and assessing the true hearing threshold becomes difficult. In such cases, objective tests are used for hearing-threshold determination (i.e., auditory brainstem evoked potentials [ABEP] and frequency-specific auditory evoked potentials: slow negative response at 10 msec [SN-10]). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pure-tone audiogram shape and the predictive accuracy of SN-10 and ABEP in normal controls and in patients suffering from sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). One-hundred-and-fifty subjects aged 15 to 70, some with normal hearing and the remainder with SNHL, were tested prospectively in a double-blind design. The battery of tests included pure-tone audiometry (air and bone conduction), speech reception threshold, ABEP, and SN-10. Patients with SNHL were divided into four categories according to audiogram shape (i.e., flat, ascending, descending, and all other shapes). The results showed that ABEP predicts behavioral thresholds at 3 kHz and 4 kHz in cases of high-frequency hearing loss. Also demonstrated was that ABEP threshold estimation at 3 kHz was not affected significantly by audiogram contour. A good correlation was observed between SN-10 and psychoacoustic thresholds at 1 kHz, the only exception being the group of subjects with ascending audiogram, in which SN-10 overestimated the hearing threshold.     

Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum stimulus levels at which a measured auditory steady-state response (ASSR) can be assumed to be a reliable measure of auditory thresholds. DESIGN: ASSR thresholds were measured at octave frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz in 10 subjects with profound hearing loss. These subjects provided no behavioral responses to sound at the limits of pure-tone audiometers and at the limits of the stimulus levels produced by the ASSR device. Subjects were divided into two groups of five, with repeated measures obtained within the same session in one group and repeated measures obtained in a separate session on a different day in the other group. RESULTS: ASSR thresholds were observed in all 10 subjects at each of four frequencies and in both trials. On average, these ASSR thresholds were observed at 100 dB HL (SD = 5 dB). Because these responses were at least 18 to 22 dB below the limits of the equipment where all subjects had no behavioral responses, it is reasonable to conclude that the ASSRs were not generated by the auditory system. CONCLUSIONS: An artifact or distortion may be present in the recording of ASSRs at high levels. These data bring into question the view that there is a wider dynamic range for ASSR measurements compared with auditory brain stem response measurements, at least with current implementation.     

不同程度感音神经性听力损失儿童ASSR、click-ABR反应阈与行为听阈的相关性

目的 探讨不同程度感音神经性听力损失儿童听性稳态反应(ASSR)、短声听性脑干反应(click-ABR)与行为阈值的相关性及在听障儿童听力评估中的价值.方法 回顾性分析2019年1月至2019年12月确诊的46例(92耳)感音神经性听力损失儿童的ASSR、click-ABR及行为听阈结果,其中,轻度听力损失4耳,中度听...     

Estimation of hearing loss in children: comparison of auditory steady-state response, auditory brainstem response, and behavioral test methods

The current pediatric test battery is limited in the severe-to-profound hearing loss range by the inability to obtain frequency-specific thresholds. Auditory steady-state response (ASSR) is an evoked potential test that can accurately measure auditory sensitivity beyond the limits of other test methods. The limited amount of clinical research, however, has delayed the acceptance of ASSR into the standard pediatric test battery. This study compared thresholds from 76 children using ASSR, ABR, and behavioral test methods. Resulting correlations were strong and supported the inclusion of ASSR into the standard pediatric test battery. ASSR testing provides audiometric information that is essential in the management of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.     

Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss

The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has gained popularity as an alternative technique for objective audiometry but its use in less severe degrees of hearing loss has been questioned. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the ASSR in estimating moderate degrees of hearing loss. Seven subjects (12 ears) with moderate sensorineural hearing loss between 15 and 18 years of age were enrolled in the study. Forty-eight behavioural and ASSR thresholds were obtained across the frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. ASSR thresholds were determined using a dichotic multiple frequency recording technique. Mean threshold differences varied between 2 and 8 dB (±7–10 dB SD) across frequencies. The highest difference and variability was recorded at 0.5 kHz. The frequencies 1–4 kHz also revealed significantly better correlations (0.74–0.88) compared to 0.5 kHz (0.31). Comparing correlation coefficients for behavioural thresholds less than 60 and 60 dB and higher revealed a significant difference. Eighty-six percent of ASSR thresholds corresponded within 5 dB of moderate to severe behavioural thresholds compared to only 29% for mild to moderate thresholds in this study. The results confirm that the ASSR can reliably estimate behavioural thresholds of 60 dB and higher, but due to increased variability, caution is recommended when estimating behavioural thresholds of less than 60 dB, especially at 0.5 kHz.     

成人感音神经性聋的听觉稳态反应反应阈与纯音听阈

目的探讨成人感音神经性聋的听觉稳态反应（auditory steady-state responses,ASSR）反应阈与纯音听阈的关系。方法选择中国医科大学附属一院耳鼻咽喉科门诊感音神经性聋的成人患者,分别进行纯音听力测试、ASSR检查,比较ASSR在0.5、1、2、4 kHz频率处的反应阈与纯音听阈的相关性及按听力损失程度比较两者的差值。结果 ASSR反应阈与纯音听阈在各频率处的相关系数分别为0.840、0.905、0.886、0.924;随着感音神经性听力损失的加重二者的差值明显缩小。随着频率的增加,两者的差值明显缩小。结论成人感音神经性聋ASSR反应阈与纯音听阈有显著相关性,随着听力损失的加重,ASSR反应阈愈接近纯音听阈,ASSR作为成人感音神经性聋听力定量诊断的客观方法有很大的临床应用价值。     

Steady-state response audiometry in a group of patients with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive value of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) evoked potential thresholds and predicted behavioral thresholds in a group of children with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss (HL). STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Twenty-nine children with sloping sensorineural HL underwent behavioral audiometric evaluation, impedance testing, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and steady-state response testing. A t test was performed to compare the means of ASSR predicted behavioral thresholds and behavioral responses. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated at each tested frequency, 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 2,000 Hz, and 4,000 Hz, using the same data. RESULTS: Bracketed thresholds were obtained at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 2,000 Hz, and 4,000 Hz. Nineteen ears were used in this evaluation. A comparison of threshold difference as a function of bracketing revealed that the means were statistically different (P < .05). The mean threshold differences were calculated, and Pearson r values were determined between the behavioral thresholds and the predicted thresholds using the Rance 95 algorithm. The results revealed no difference of means at 500 Hz between predicted and measured behavioral thresholds. Linear regression analysis revealed strong correlation at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: The GSI Audera appears to predict the configuration of HL in children with steeply sloping sensorineural HLs and over-predicts the severity of the loss by 15 to 20 dB above 500 Hz at each test frequency (1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz). Correlation coefficients display a strong correlation at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz.