Can a within/between-session change in pain during reassessment predict outcome using a manual therapy intervention in patients with mechanical low back pain?

The purposes of the study were to determine whether the combined occurrence of within/between-session changes were significantly associated with functional outcomes, pain, and self-report of recovery in patients at discharge who were treated with manual therapy for low back pain. A secondary purpose was to determine the extent of change needed for the within/between-session change with association to function. The study involved 100 subjects who were part of a randomized controlled trial that examined manual therapy techniques who demonstrated a positive response to manual therapy during the initial assessment. Within- and between-session findings (within/between session) were defined as a change in pain report from baseline to after the second physiotherapy visit. Within/between-session changes were analyzed for associations between pain change scores at discharge, rate of recovery, and a 50% reduction of the Oswestry disability index (ODI) by discharge. The results suggest there is a significant association between a within/between-session change after the second physiotherapy visit and discharge outcomes for pain and ODI in this sample of patients who received a manual therapy intervention. A 2-point change or greater on an 11-point scale is associated with functional recovery at discharge and accurately described the outcome in 67% of the cases. This is the first study that has shown an association of within/between-session changes with disability scores at discharge and is the first to define the extent of change necessary for prognosis of an outcome. A within/between-session change should be considered as a complimentary artifact along with other examination findings during clinical decision making.     

Is there a dose response relationship between soft tissue manual therapy and clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia?

BackgroundCurrent clinical guidelines do not support the use of manual therapy (MT) interventions for Fibromyalgia (FM) patients, despite evidence of positive biochemical, mechanical and psychological effects, and the popularity of hands-on treatments amongst patients. An optimal dose for MT has not been established; this may explain the discrepancies found within the published literature. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether there is a dose response relationship for MT leading to improvements in core domains of FM symptomology; Pain, Mood, Sleep, Global Measure of Impact (Functional Status & Quality of Life).MethodsWe searched six databases from 1990 to January 2018; studies were evaluated using the PEDro scale. Within-group (ESd) and between-group (ESg) Effect Sizes were calculated.ResultsWe identified and screened 4012 articles, 12 articles were critically appraised. Overall, there is moderate evidence that MT has positive effects on the four clinical outcomes investigated. However, there was no consistent dose response relationship observed across all studies.ConclusionsA dose of approximately 45 min MT, three to five times per week, for three to five weeks, totalling 11 h 15 min, should be considered a baseline generic protocol for treatment delivery and research trials. Further research is necessary to confirm domain specific, or patient specific optimal doses. Moderator variables such as treatment time, frequency, duration; and MT type also need to be explored to ensure optimal delivery of MT in future research and clinical care provision.     

Do changes within a manual therapy treatment session predict between-session changes for patients with cervical spine pain?

Physiotherapists often use within-session changes to provide a guide for refining treatment application. This study tested the validity of within-session changes as predictors of between-session changes for patients with neck pain receiving manual therapy treatment. A total of 70 pairs of treatments from 29 patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain receiving manual therapy were assessed to determine the relationship between within-session and between-session changes in range of motion (ROM), pain intensity, and centralisation. Measurements were taken of ROM of the more limited direction on each axis of flexion, extension, lateral-flexion and rotation, and pain (intensity and location) before and after treatment. The same measurements were repeated before the following treatment. Regression analysis demonstrated that within-session change accounted for 26% to 48% of the variability in between-session change for ROM and six per cent for pain intensity. The proportion of the within-session change for ROM maintained between sessions ranged from 42% to 63% (95% CI 25% to 88%). The odds ratios for within-session improved/not improved categorisation to predict between-session category for ROM ranged from 2.5 (95% CI 0.6 to 4.3) to 21.3 (95% CI 10.1 to 96.1), for pain intensity 4.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 14.4) and for pain centralisation 9.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 38.7) indicating greater likelihood of between-session improvement after within-session improvement. The between-session results for most patients (71% to 83%) could be classified correctly by their within-session category. The results support the use of within-session changes in ROM, centralisation, and possibly pain intensity as predictors of between-session changes for musculoskeletal disorders of the cervical spine.     

Is one better than another?: A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for patients with chronic neck pain

Our purpose was to compare the effectiveness of three manual therapy techniques: high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA), mobilization (Mob) and sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG) in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). The randomized controlled trial included patients with mechanically reproducible CNP, who were randomized to the treatment group. Outcome measures were the Visual Analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Global Rating of Change (GROC) and Cervical Range of Motion (CROM). Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance compared outcomes at baseline, at the end of treatment and 1, 2 and 3 months after treatment. A total of 51 subjects completed the trial. No significant differences were found between HVLA, Mob and SNAG at the end of treatment and during the follow-up in any of the analysed outcomes. There were no differences in satisfaction for all techniques. The results lead to the conclusion that there is no long-term difference between the application of HVLA, Mob and SNAG in pain, disability and cervical range of motion for patients with CNP.     

Is there hope for chronic pain and headache?

Currently the clinical needs for pain and headache management are not met. Despite the numerous and exciting recent advances in understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms that originate pain, we cannot yet fully explain the mechanism underlying the biology of chronic pain. Pain is a natural mechanism preserving our species survival; however, when the protective quality is lost, physiologic changes to the peripheral and central nervous systems result in the formation of chronic pain states. Once we understand how this chronic pain state is created, either through genetic, environmental, therapeutic, or other triggers we may be able to enhance our species existence, limiting maladaptive pain and suffering. The future therapeutic targets will need to address the genetics, neurophysiologic changes of the neurons and brain as well as help control immune systems including the glia. The key to successful headache and pain therapy is research aimed at prevention and minimizing the plastic changes triggering chronic pain.     

Is there altered activity of the extensor muscles in chronic mechanical neck pain? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

O'Leary S, Cagnie B, Reeve A, Jull G, Elliott JM. Is there altered activity of the extensor muscles in chronic mechanical neck pain? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Objective

To compare the pattern of neck extensor muscle use in participants with chronic mechanical neck pain to that of healthy controls during 2 different extension exercises by use of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (mfMRI).

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

University laboratory.

Participants

Data recorded from subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain (n=12; 10 women, 2 men) were compared with previously recorded data from healthy subjects (n=11; 7 men, 4 women).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

mfMRI measures of shifts in T2 relaxation were made for the multifidus, semispinalis cervicis, semispinalis capitis, and splenius capitis muscles, at C2-3, C5-6, and C7-T1 levels, prior and immediately after 2 different exercises: cervical extension in craniocervical neutral (CCN) and cervical extension in craniocervical extension. T2 shift values (difference between pre- and postexercise T2 relaxation values) for each muscle and exercise condition were used for analysis.

Results

While there were observed differences in differential activation of the extensor muscles in participants with mechanical neck pain compared with controls, these differences were only evident for the CCN exercise condition and were only observed for 3 out of the 7 muscle regions of interest during this exercise.

Conclusions

Results of this study suggest some alteration in the differential activation of the cervical extensors in patients with mechanical neck pain and indicate that further investigation of this muscle group in mechanical neck pain disorders is warranted.     

Is there a difference in response to manual cranial bone tissue assessment techniques between participants with cervical and/or temporomandibular complaints versus a control group?

AimManual cranial bone tissue techniques (CBTT) are used by physiotherapists as a tool for assessment and treatment of complaints in the craniocervical, face, and head regions. The goal of this study was to determine whether CBTT were able to discriminate between subjects with cervical and/or temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and a healthy group. In addition, the inter-rater reliability when applying CBTT was also investigated.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted and included 60 participants. Six standardized passive techniques were applied and judged for resistance, compliance, and sensory answer. In order to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of these techniques a cohort of participants was measured twice (by two evaluators) prospectively. A logistic regression model and Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analyses were used to determining the discriminative validity of these techniques.ResultsLogistic regression identified a significant difference for five techniques for resistance and/or compliance and/or the sensory answer between the groups. Based on the Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis, the discriminative ability of the temporal rotation to distinguish between the groups was fair to good (for resistance AUC = 0.7775 and for compliance AUC = 0.8065). The highest agreement between the two assessors was for the resistance with occipital compression (73%) technique.ConclusionThis study highlights that some of the CBTT could be potentially useful in distinguishing subjects with cervical and/or TMD from healthy subjects. Inter-rater reliability was moderate. CBTT could be potentially integrated in the examination of participants with complaints in the craniofacial region.     

Is there still a role for open cordotomy in cancer pain management?

For a small number of cancer patients, good pain control remains difficult to achieve despite adequate assessment and medical management. In nine cases, effective control of intractable pain from malignant pelvic disease was achieved by open thoracic cordotomy. The technique was well tolerated, with no major complications. Eight of the nine patients decreased their median daily oral morphine requirement from 560 mg (range 360-2600 mg) to 160 mg (range 40-1000 mg). Maximal survival time post-cordotomy was 830 days, with a median of 107 days. No patient experienced recurrent pain in the initially painful site. For patients with intractable pain associated with advanced pelvic malignancy, the use of an open cordotomy should be considered when satisfactory pain control is not achieved by medical or minimally invasive methods.     

Is there a science to facilitate implementation of evidence-based practices and programs?

Funding agencies, such as National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Education Science have recognized the need to improve the uptake of empirically supported practices into everyday service delivery in real-world settings. Implementation Science is a new discipline that seeks to remedy this problem through careful investigation using traditional and new research methods. We begin this Special Issue on Implementation Science with some of the definitions forwarded to help us understand the distinction among different types of research that are fundamental to Implementation Science. This introductory article discusses some of the traditional assumptions that have been called into question by this new discipline. We then outline some of the highlights of the four subsequent articles in this issue. The final section of this paper summarizes some of the ideas that are likely to shape the future of research that promises to advance evidence-based communication intervention practices.     

How a clock can change your pain? The illusion of duration and pain perception

The intensity of experimental pain is known to be dependent on stimulation duration. However, it remains unknown whether this effect arises largely from the actual stimulus duration or is substantially influenced by the subject’s perception of the stimulus duration. In the present study, we questioned this issue by misleading the perception of the duration of pain in a population of 36 healthy volunteers stimulated with a thermode. To this aim, time was signified by a clock with rotating hands in which imperceptible differences in speed rotation had been introduced. Subjects were therefore immersed in 2 comparative conditions in which time was manipulated to provide the illusion of either long or short duration of the painful stimulus. In a first condition (“full-length” clock), participants were instructed that pain would last for a complete revolution of the clock’s hands, whereas in the second condition (“shortened” clock), revolution was reduced by 25%. Although the intensity and the real duration of stimulation were identical in both conditions, the intensity of pain was significantly reduced when the perception of time was misleadingly shortened by the manipulated clock. This study suggests that the perceived duration of a noxious stimulation may influence the perceived intensity of pain.     

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ and its receptor--potential targets for pain therapy?

The neuropeptide nociceptin, also called orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), is the endogenous agonist of the N/OFQ peptide receptor (NOP receptor). Both N/OFQ and the NOP receptor share a high degree of homology with classical opioid peptides and opioid receptors, respectively, and use similar signal transduction pathways as classical opioids. The NOP receptor has thus been regarded as the fourth member of the opioid receptor family. Despite this close relationship, 7 years of research have demonstrated that the N/OFQ system has a distinct pharmacological profile and serves different physiological functions. In particular, its role in the control of pain and analgesia at different levels of integration appears quite different from that of classical opioids. The recent development of specific antagonists at the NOP receptor and of NOP receptor or N/OFQ precursor knock-out mice have generated new insights into the role of N/OFQ in pain processing and help to evaluate the N/OFQ-NOP system as a potential target for new analgesic drugs.