Identification of the affected ear in lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Background:

The effective management of lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV) is dependent upon the accurate identification of the affected ear. The supine roll test is the gold standard for diagnosing LC-BPPV. However, in some cases, the elicited nystagmus has a similar intensity when the head is rolled to the right or to the left.

Objectives:

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of accessory diagnostic procedures, used in conjunction with the supine roll test, at accurately identifying the affected ear in individuals with LC-BPPV.

Methods:

The following databases were searched: (1) CINAHL Plus with Full Text, (2) ProQuest Medical Library, and (3) MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: (1) ‘lateral canal’ OR ‘horizontal canal’ AND (2) ‘positional vertigo’ OR ‘positioning vertigo’ OR ‘positional nystagmus’ OR ‘positioning nystagmus’. Evidence level was examined with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence method, and methodological rigour was examined with the QUADAS method.

Results:

A database search originally identified 1348 records, and nine studies were ultimately included in the qualitative synthesis. This systematic review revealed four index tests that, when used in conjunction with the supine roll test, were able to accurately identify the affected ear in a majority of individuals with LC-BPPV.

Conclusions:

The pseudo-spontaneous test was found to be slightly superior to the other three index tests in terms of eliciting nystagmus during its administration and identifying the same affected ear as the supine roll test.     

A randomized clinical trial to compare the immediate effects of seated thoracic manipulation and targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine flexion range of motion and pain

Design:

Randomized clinical trial.

Objectives:

To determine the effectiveness of seated thoracic manipulation versus targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine pain and flexion range of motion (ROM). There is evidence that thoracic spine manipulation is an effective treatment for patients with cervical spine pain. This evidence includes a variety of techniques to manipulate the thoracic spine. Although each of them is effective, no research has compared techniques to determine which produces the best outcomes.

Methods:

A total of 39 patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to either a seated thoracic manipulation or targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. Pain and flexion ROM measures were taken before and after the intervention.

Results:

Pain reduction (post-treatment–pre-treatment) was significantly greater in those patients receiving the targeted supine thoracic manipulation compared to the seated thoracic manipulation (P<0·05). Although not significant, we did observe greater improvement in flexion ROM in the targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. The results of this study indicate that a targeted supine thoracic manipulation may be more effective in reducing cervical spine pain and improving cervical flexion ROM than a seated thoracic manipulation. Future studies should include a variety of patients and physical therapists (PTs) to validate our findings.     

The effectiveness of cervical versus thoracic thrust manipulation for the improvement of pain,disability, and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain

Background:

Many patients present to physical therapy with mechanical neck pain. Cervical and thoracic manipulations are being utilized in treating this impairment, but minimal evidence as to which technique is superior exists in the literature.

Objective:

The purpose of this systematic review is to identify whether cervical or thoracic manipulation is more effective at improving pain, range of motion (ROM), and disability in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Methods:

A comprehensive search of published literature from seven search engines (PubMed, ProQuest, PEDro, CINAHL, Healthsource, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus) yielded 13 studies that examined the effectiveness of either cervical manipulations, thoracic manipulations, or cervical and thoracic manipulations to relieve the effects of mechanical neck pain. Eleven of the studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while two were secondary analyses of RCTs. Each study was assessed using the PEDro scale and found to be of fair to high research quality.

Results:

The studies included in this systematic review produced both positive clinical and statistical differences in pain, disability, and ROM following manipulations of the cervical or thoracic spine.

Conclusion:

There is limited high-quality research directly comparing the two interventions, so determining whether cervical or thoracic thrust manipulation is superior cannot be concluded from this systematic review alone. However, based on the results found in this review, cervical and thoracic thrust manipulations are equally valuable in relieving pain, disability, and improving ROM for a patient with mechanical neck pain in the short term.     

The creation of the diagnostic accuracy quality scale (DAQS)

Background:

The utility of a dedicated clinical test is dependent on the diagnostic accuracy values and the quality of the study in which the test was examined. Scales allow a summative scoring of bias within a study. At present, there are no scales advocated to measure the bias of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to create a new diagnostic accuracy quality scale (DAQS) that provides a quantitative summary of the methodological quality of studies evaluating clinical tests and measures.

Design:

The study used a four-round Delphi survey designed to create, revise, and develop consensus for a quality scale.

Methods:

The four-round Delphi involved a work team and a respondent group of experts. An initial round among the work team created a working document, which was then modified and revised, with opportunities to create new items threaded in the second round. Rounds III and IV involved voting on the importance of each of the proposed items and consensus development from the respondent group. Consensus for the selection of an item required a 75% approval for the importance of that item.

Results:

Sixteen individuals with a variety of research/professional backgrounds made up the respondent group. Modification and revision of the initial work team instrument created a scale with 21 items that reflected potential areas of methodological bias.

Limitations:

The new scale needs validation through weighted assessment. In addition, there was a large proportion of physical therapist/researchers on the work team and the respondent group.

Conclusions:

Systematic reviews allow summation of evidence for clinical tests and scales are essential to critique the quality of the articles included in the review. The DAQS may serve this role for diagnostic accuracy studies.     

Pain pattern classification and directional preference for patients with neck pain

Objectives:

Pain Pattern Classification (PPC) and Directional Preference (DP) have been shown to be predictive of health care outcomes and serve to guide orthopedic clinical decision making. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study to verify the association between PPC, DP, and clinical outcomes.

Methods:

Clinical outcome measures including pain intensity and disability were completed at first examination and follow-up by 335 patients. A Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to determine differences in prevalence rates for the categorical variables, and two-sample t-tests were used to determine differences in rates for the continuous variables. A Tukey’s range test was used to determine differences in follow-up pain intensity and disability for neck pain dual-classification schemes.

Results:

The prevalence of DP was 82.4%. The prevalence of CEN, Non-CEN, and Non-Classifiable (NC) was 15.2%, 42.1%, and 25.1%, respectively. The prevalence of DP was lowest for patients with sub-acute symptoms and who were <45 years old. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average 2.62 NDI units less than patients classified as Non-DP. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average, 0.90 pain intensity units less than patients classified as Non-DP at follow-up. Patients who demonstrated DP CEN did not have clinically significant lower pain intensity or disability at follow-up than patients who demonstrated Non-DP.

Discussion:

The results of this investigation need to be interpreted with caution with respect to the study design and it’s subsequent strengths and limitations.

Level of Evidence:

1b.     

The effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) intervention on body functions,activity limitations,and participation restrictions in people with neurological conditions

Background:

Vibration intervention has recently become a popular modality in professional sport and fitness and has also been suggested to offer potential in augmenting exercises in the rehabilitation field for various neurological conditions.

Objectives:

The main objective of this review was to assess the effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) intervention on body functions, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in people with neurological conditions. The second objective was to assist healthcare professionals in their clinical practice by evaluating the main parameters of WBV intervention that may be of benefit.

Methods:

Electronic databases (EMBASE, Academic Search Complete, AMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and Cochrane library) were searched. Intervention studies with a comparison group, investigating the effect of WBV intervention on people with neurological conditions, were included. The methodological quality of papers was independently assessed by two raters using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.

Results:

Sixteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Only one paper was considered ‘excellent’ methodological quality study (9 out of 10 points). Four studies evaluated changes when WBV was compared to no intervention and two found significant improvements for strength, gait, and balance. Twelve compared WBV to other interventions and only two found significant differences in favour of the WBV group, for strength and gait.

Conclusion:

The cumulative findings for strength, balance, and gait suggest that while groups improve following WBV, this improvement is not consistently greater than either no intervention or a comparison intervention. This suggests insufficient evidence to support the effects of WBV training.     

Is there preliminary value to a within- and/or between-session change for determining short-term outcomes of manual therapy on mechanical neck pain?

Objectives:

The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether occurrences of within- and between-session changes were significantly associated with functional outcomes, pain, and self-report of recovery in patients at discharge who were treated with manual therapy for mechanical neck pain. A secondary purpose was to determine the extent of change needed for the within- and between-session change in association to function.

Methods:

This secondary data analysis examined 56 patients who demonstrated a positive response to manual therapy during the initial assessment within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that examined manual therapy techniques and a home exercise program (HEP). Within- and between-session findings were defined as ‘changes in pain report during the initial session (within)’ and ‘changes in pain from baseline to 48-hours post initial assessment (between)’. Outcomes were analyzed for associations with the global rating of change (GRoC), self-report activity scale (SRAS), and a 50% reduction of the neck disability index (NDI) by discharge at 96 hours.

Results:

Findings indicate that within-session pain changes of 36·7% are strongly associated with a 50% change in NDI at 96 hours. Between-session changes in pain were associated with 50% change in NDI and a ≧3-point change in GRoC at 96 hours.

Conclusion:

Both within- and between-session measures may be useful to predict success levels at 96 hours for NDI; however, between-session changes are more useful to predict success in GRoC. Measures used during clinical examination may help guide clinicians in identification of candidates best suited for the treatment.     

Yoga for pain and sleep quality in rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Background:

Yoga is a popular complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy among people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), perceived as offering self-management options for physical and psychosocial symptoms associated with RA.

Objectives:

The primary aims of the current pilot study are (1) to assess the feasibility and safety of a relaxation-focused yoga intervention tailored for people with RA and (2) to estimate the effect of yoga on RA-related pain, sleep quality, functional disability, disease activity, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and fatigue.

Method:

Twenty-eight participants with at least minimum levels of RA-related pain and sleep disturbance will be recruited from a local public hospital database. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized into either a yoga group (receiving an 8-week program of once-weekly 75-minute relaxation-based yoga classes and thrice-weekly home practice), or a usual care control group. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 9, and 12 weeks. Feasibility is operationalized as acceptability (recruitment, adherence, participant retention, and participant satisfaction) and safety of the yoga intervention. Effect sizes for changes in pain, sleep quality, functional disability, disease activity, quality of life, mental health, and fatigue will be estimated.

Discussion:

Results of this pilot study will provide empirical data to determine if a larger, statistically powered main trial is feasible and safe in a national RA population. Additionally, participant feedback will provide information regarding further adaption and tailoring of the study protocol to a clinical RA population.

Trial registration:

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612001019897 (registered 20/09/2012).     

The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews

Objective:

to review and update the evidence for different forms of manual therapy (MT) for patients with different stages of non-specific low back pain (LBP).

Data sources:

MEDLINE, Cochrane-Register-of-Controlled-Trials, PEDro, EMBASE.

Method:

A systematic review of MT with a literature search covering the period of January 2000 to April 2013 was conducted by two independent reviewers according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. A total of 360 studies were evaluated using qualitative criteria. Two stages of LBP were categorized; combined acute–subacute and chronic. Further sub-classification was made according to MT intervention: MT1 (manipulation); MT2 (mobilization and soft-tissue-techniques); and MT3 (MT1 combined with MT2). In each sub-category, MT could be combined or not with exercise or usual medical care (UMC). Consequently, quantitative evaluation criteria were applied to 56 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and hence 23 low-risk of bias RCTs were identified for review. Only studies providing new updated information (11/23 RCTs) are presented here.

Results:

Acute–subacute LBP: STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 when compared to sham for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term (1–3 months). MODERATE-evidence to support MT1 and MT3 combined with UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term.

Chronic LBP:

MODERATE to STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 in comparison to sham for pain, function and overall-health in the short-term. MODERATE-evidence in favour of MT3 combined with exercise or UMC in comparison to exercise and back-school was established for pain, function and quality-of-life in the short and long-term. LIMITED-evidence in favour of MT2 combined with exercise and UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain and function from short to long-term. LIMITED-evidence of no effect for MT1 with extension-exercise compared to extension-exercise alone for pain in the short to long-term.

Conclusion:

This systematic review updates the evidence for MT with exercise or UMC for different stages of LBP and provides recommendations for future studies.     

Does deprivation influence treatment outcome in physiotherapy?

Background:

The relationship between deprivation status and health is well documented with less deprived populations experiencing lower rates of morbidity and mortality than those from more deprived groups. The mechanisms that link deprivation to health are multi-factorial and complex. The relationship between deprivation and health remains largely unexplored in physiotherapy management.

Objectives:

To systematically collate, appraise, and summarize primary studies that investigate the relationship between deprivation and treatment outcomes in physiotherapy.

Methods:

A systematic search of electronic databases was performed using a specified strategy. A three-phase screening process was used to identify relevant primary studies. Two independent reviewers selected the articles, rated quality, and extracted data. Meta-analysis was not performed due to diversity of conditions, interventions, and outcome measures used. Qualitative analysis was performed, and levels of evidence were generated using an established framework.

Results:

Three studies met the inclusion criteria; all were deemed of high quality. All three studies found that low socioeconomic status (SES) negatively influenced physiotherapy treatment outcomes.

Conclusion:

There is strong evidence to suggest that low SES negatively affects treatment outcomes in physiotherapy. This is in line with findings from other areas of medicine and allied health. The relationship appears to be complex and multifaceted. Key potential causal mechanisms are identified and explored with reference to existing literature. Further research is required to elucidate this complex relationship and to allow development of strategies that reduce the impact of deprivation on physiotherapy outcomes.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical investigation into pain reduction effect of placing the pain spot outside the intersection area of the two currents of interferential therapy compared to traditional method

Background: Interferential therapy (IFT) is applied to intersect in the painful area but no confirmed effect with this method. Experimentally, the highest voltage of IFT is induced outside the intersection of the two currents. Placing the painful area outside the intersection point (external application) would reveal a better effect.

Objectives: To examine the effect of external application in pain compared to traditional method.

Design: A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical investigation.

Setting: A public hospital.

Participants: 168 LBP subjects.

Interventions: Assignment: (1) external IFT, (2) placebo external IFT, (3) traditional IFT and (4) placebo traditional IFT. Groups 1 and 3 received 20 min of IFT at 100 Hz and groups 2 and 4 received sham IFT.

Main outcome measures: Before and after IFT session, pain severity (VAS), pressure threshold (PPT), pain distribution and ROM were assessed.

Results: IFT changed all outcomes similarly. VAS and ROM improved statistically, P < 0.03. A trend of better VAS reduced with active IFTs.

Conclusions: No therapeutic difference between the two methods.     

Metastatic cancer mimicking mechanical low back pain: a case report

Objective and Importance:

The purpose of this report is to describe the clinical course of a patient referred to physiotherapy (PT) for the treatment of low back pain who was subsequently diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Clinical Presentation:

A 48-year old woman was referred to PT for the evaluation and treatment of an insidious onset of low back pain of 2 month duration. The patient did not have a history of cancer, recent weight changes, or general health concerns. The patient’s history and physical examination were consistent with a mechanical neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction and no red flag findings were present that warranted immediate medical referral.

Intervention:

Short-term symptomatic improvements were achieved using the treatment-based classification approach. However, despite five PT sessions over the course of 5 weeks, the patient did not experience long-term symptomatic improvement. On the sixth session, the patient reported a 2-day history of left hand weakness and headaches. This prompted the physiotherapist to refer the patient to the emergency department where she was diagnosed with lung cancer.

Conclusion:

Differential diagnosis is a key component of PT practice. The ability to reproduce symptoms or achieve short-term symptomatic gains is not sufficient to rule out sinister pathology. This case demonstrates how extra caution should be taken in patients who are smokers with thoracolumbar region pain of unknown origin. The need for caution is magnified when one can achieve no more than short-term improvements in the patient’s symptoms.     

Thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review

Objectives:

Thoracic manipulation is widely used in physical therapy and has been shown to be effective at addressing mechanical neck pain. However, thoracic mobilization may produce similar effects. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature regarding the effectiveness of thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Methods:

ProQuest, NCBI-PubMed, APTA's Hooked on Evidence, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched to identify relevant studies. Fourteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and the GRADE approach.

Results:

The literature as assessed by the PEDro scale was fair and the GRADE method showed overall quality ranging from very low to moderate quality. The 14 included studies showed positive outcomes on cervical pain levels, range of motion, and/or disability with the use of thoracic manipulation or mobilization. There was a paucity of literature directly comparing thoracic manipulation and mobilization.

Discussion:

Current limitations in the body of research, specifically regarding the use of thoracic mobilization, limit the recommendation of its use compared to thoracic manipulation for patients with mechanical neck pain. There is, however, a significant amount of evidence, although of varied quality, for the short-term benefits of thoracic manipulation in treating patients with this condition. Further high quality research is necessary to determine which technique is more effective in treating patients with mechanical neck pain.     

The effect of direction specific thoracic spine manipulation on the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial

Objectives: To determine the difference on neck outcomes with directional manipulation to the thoracic spine. There is evidence that thoracic spine manipulation is effective in treating patients with neck pain. However, there is no research that determines if the assessment of directional hypomobility and the selection of thrust direction offer improved outcomes.

Methods: A total of 69 patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to receive either a manipulation that was consistent with their thoracic spine motion loss (matched) or opposite their motion loss (unmatched). The patient was given care consistent with the orthopedic section guidelines for neck pain and the physical therapist’s clinical reasoning. Baseline outcome measures (NPRS, NDI, GROC) were taken and reassessed two days and two weeks after treatment.

Results: Both groups had positive results when pain, neck disability index, and global rating of change were assessed. There was no difference between the matched and unmatched groups.

Discussion: Directional manipulation of hypomobile thoracic spine segments may not be required to improved outcomes in patients with neck pain. Future studies should assess a variety of factors when determining the best available treatment, including manual therapy procedures, exercise, and patient selection.

Level of Evidence: 1b.     

Content and bibliometric analyses of the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Background:

Article characteristics and trends have been elucidated for other physical therapy-focused journals using content and bibliometric analysis. These findings are important for assessing the current state of a journal and for guiding future publication of research. To date, these analyses have not been performed for the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (JMMT).

Objective:

To describe content and trends for articles published in JMMT over a 20-year period (1993–2012).

Methods:

Journal articles were coded using previously-established domains (article type, participant type, research design, study purpose, and clinical condition). Total publications and proportion of publications based on domain were described. Articles specific to manual therapy intervention were examined and compared to data from other physical therapy-focused journals. Impact by citation and author was examined using bibliometric software.

Results:

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy was found to have a recent acceleration in the number of articles published annually. Over time, topical reviews have decreased in favor of research reports. However, rigorous study designs have represented only a small portion of total journal content, and case reports have maintained a consistent publication presence. Manual therapy intervention articles in JMMT are predominantly case designs, however are similar in characteristics to manual therapy intervention articles published in other physical therapy-focused journals. For JMMT articles overall and manual therapy intervention articles across journals, young to middle-aged symptomatic adults with low back and/or neck pain were the most common study participants.

Discussion:

Increases in the number of papers and a move toward research reports were observed in JMMT over the 20-year period. Considerations for the future were outlined, including the publication of articles with more rigorous research designs. Manual therapy research for adolescents and older adults and for upper and lower extremity conditions should also be considered as priorities for the future.     

The effect on the patient flow in a local health care after implementing reverse triage in a primary care emergency department: a longitudinal follow-up study

Objective: Reverse triage means that patients who are not considered to be in need of medical services are not placed on the doctor’s list in an emergency department (ED) but are sent, after face-to-face evaluation by a triage nurse, to a more appropriate health care unit. It is not known how an abrupt application of such reverse triage in a combined primary care ED alters the demand for doctors’ services in collaborative parts of the health care system.

Design: An observational study.

Setting: Register-based retrospective quasi-experimental longitudinal follow-up study based on a before–after setting in a Finnish city.

Subjects: Patients who consulted different doctors in a local health care unit.

Main outcome measures: Numbers of monthly visits to different doctor groups in public and private primary care, and numbers of monthly referrals to secondary care ED from different sources of primary care were recorded before and after abrupt implementation of the reverse triage.

Results: The beginning of reverse triage decreased the number of patient visits to a primary ED doctor without increasing mortality. Simultaneously, there was an increase in doctor visits in the adjacent secondary care ED and local private sector. The number of patients who came to secondary care ED without a referral or with a referral from the private sector increased.

Conclusions: The data suggested that the reverse triage causes redistribution of the use of doctors’ services rather than a true decrease in the use of these services.     

Parent-based diagnosis of ADHD is as accurate as a teacher-based diagnosis of ADHD

Objective: To review the literature evaluating the psychometric properties of parent and teacher informants relative to a gold-standard ADHD diagnosis in pediatric populations.

Method: We included studies that included both a parent and teacher informant, a gold-standard diagnosis, and diagnostic accuracy metrics. Potential confounds were evaluated. We also assessed the ‘OR’ and the ‘AND’ rules for combining informant reports.

Results: Eight articles met inclusion criteria. The diagnostic accuracy for predicting gold standard ADHD diagnoses did not differ between parents and teachers. Sample size, sample type, participant drop-out, participant age, participant gender, geographic area of the study, and date of study publication were assessed as potential confounds.

Conclusion: Parent and teachers both yielded moderate to good diagnostic accuracy for ADHD diagnoses. Parent reports were statistically indistinguishable from those of teachers. The predictive features of the ‘OR’ and ‘AND’ rules are useful in evaluating approaches to better integrating information from these informants.     

Adductor-related groin pain in the athlete

Background:

Owing to a multifactorial etiology, the differential diagnosis of groin pain in the athlete is often complex, with a diagnosis being clinically elusive in up to 30% of individuals. It has been suggested in the literature that the adductor musculature is a viable and prevalent source of groin pain. Thus, recognition of the elements related to effective management of these individuals is essential for the clinician.

Objectives:

To review the current literature related to prevalence, risk factors, clinical testing, conservative, and surgical interventions for adductor-related groin pain.

Major findings:

Adductor-related groin injuries may occur in isolation or combination. Athletes participating in multi-directional sports, with prior groin injury, weakness of adductors compared to abductors, and higher level of play are at greatest risk. Clinical testing using the adductor squeeze test at varying angles offers high specificity in the absence of imaging modalities. Evidence for preventative programs exists among soccer and ice hockey players. Interventions focusing on progressively improving adductor muscle performance and lower extremity impairments have been found effective, as have multi-modal interventions. Surgical interventions, recommended for those recalcitrant (>2 months) to conservative care appear effective, with adductor repair or tenotomy procedures being primarily described in case series designs.

Conclusion:

A paucity of research exists to determine the diagnostic utility of clinical tests as well as the efficacy of interventions. Clinicians should be aware of adductor-related groin pain as a clinical entity and recognize the potential merits and limitations of both preventive and adductor-focused interventions.