Influenza Vaccination Is Efficacious and Safe in Renal Transplant Recipients

Whether influenza vaccination in solid-organ transplant recipients is efficacious remains a controversial issue. Furthermore, theoretical concerns have been raised regarding the safety of vaccination as it might trigger rejection of the allograft. The present prospective trial is aimed at investigating the antibody response and safety of influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients (RTR).
A total of 165 RTR and 41 healthy volunteers were vaccinated with a standard trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibodies were quantified before and 1 month after vaccination. Seroprotection (SP) and seroresponse (SR) were defined as a titer ≥40 and a 4-fold rise in HI titer, respectively. Similar SR rates were observed in both groups. Postvaccination SP rates in RTR amounted to 92.7%, 78.7% and 82.9% for A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B, respectively. High baseline SP rates, most probably reflecting frequent preimmunizations, explain partly the high postvaccination SP rates. SR rate was independently and inversely associated with baseline SP rate. Mycophenolate mofetil ( MMF ) usage was associated with a 2.6–5-fold lower SR. Nonetheless, these patients showed good postvaccination SP rates. A booster dose did not enhance SP or SR rates. Influenza vaccination neither affected allograft function nor caused rejection episodes. In conclusion, influenza vaccination is efficacious and safe in renal transplantation.     

Seasonal Maintenance of Influenza Vaccine-Induced Antibody Response in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background/Aims: Although annual influenza vaccination is recommended for kidney transplant recipients, efficacy as reflected by serum antibody titers has not been well studied beyond 1 month in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study of 51 kidney transplant recipients and 102 healthy controls receiving the 2006-2007 influenza vaccine. Anti-hemagglutinin antibody titers to A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B were measured before and 1 month after vaccination, and again at the end of influenza season. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants maintaining seroprotection (antibody titer ≥1:32) for the duration of the influenza season after influenza vaccination. Results: Median follow-up time was 175 and 155 days in the transplant and control groups, respectively. For types A/H1N1 and B, a similar high proportion of the transplant and control groups (88.5 and 81.6% vs. 83.7 and 74.2% for A/H1N1 and B, respectively) maintained seroprotection. For type A/H3N2, significantly less of the transplant group (66.7%) versus the control group (90%) maintained a protective influenza vaccine response (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.64). This difference disappeared in adjusted analyses. Actual geometric mean titers decreased significantly within both groups (p < 0.001) but this did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Once they have developed protective vaccine-induced antibody responses to influenza vaccine, kidney transplant recipients are able to maintain adequate protective levels of antibody compared with healthy controls.     

Influenza virus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients: serum antibody response to different immunosuppressive drugs

Salles MJC, Sens YAS, Boas LSV, Machado CM. Influenza virus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients: serum antibody response to different immunosuppressive drugs.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: E17–E23. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.   Abstract: 
Introduction:  This study prospectively accessed the immune response to the inactivated influenza vaccine in renal transplant recipients receiving either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Side effects were investigated.
Methods:  Sixty-nine patients received one dose of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine. Antihemagglutinin (HI) antibody response against each strain was measured before and one to six months after vaccination.
Results:  Geometric mean HI antibody titers for H1N1 and H3N2 strains increased from 2.57 and 2.44 to 13.45 (p = 0.001) and 7.20 (p < 0.001), respectively. Pre- and post-vaccination protection rates for H1N1 and H3N2 increased from 8.7% to 49.3% (p < 0.001); and 36.3% (p < 0.001) and seroconversion rates were 36% and 25.3%, respectively. There was no response to influenza B. The use of MMF reduced the H1N1 and H3N2 protection rates and the seroconversion rate for the H1N1 strain when compared with the use of azathioprine, and subjects transplanted less than 87 months also had inferior antibody response. Adverse events were mild and there were no change on renal function post-vaccination.
Conclusion:  Renal transplant patients vaccinated against influenza responded with antibody production for influenza A virus strains, but not for influenza B. Use of MMF and shorter time from transplantation decreased the immune response to the vaccine.     

Impairment of the immune response to influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients by cyclosporine, but not azathioprine

Influenza vaccination has been strongly recommended for immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. However, immunosuppression may lead to impaired antibody responses. We studied the antibody response to an inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in 59 renal transplant recipients with life-sustaining kidney function: 21 were on cyclosporine and prednisone, 38 on azathioprine and prednisone. Healthy volunteers (n = 29) and patients on hemodialysis (n = 28) served as controls. Despite comparable renal allograft function, cyclosporine-treated patients had a significantly lower immune response against influenza A viruses than azathioprine-treated patients, whether mean antibody levels, fourfold titer rise, or seroconversion to protective titers was analyzed. No significant differences in antibody responses were found between healthy controls and patients on azathioprine. The patients on hemodialysis showed an impaired response to vaccination. However, in contrast to the cyclosporine-treated patients, booster immunization proved valuable in this group.     

Influenza vaccine antibody responses in lung transplant recipients

CONTEXT: Lung transplant recipients are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza infection because of altered lung physiology and immunosuppression. Annual influenza immunization is recommended, but the ability to mount an antibody response may be limited by immunosuppressant medications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the antibody response rate to influenza vaccine in lung transplant recipients to healthy controls. DESIGN: Open label study. SETTING: Lung transplant clinic and General Clinical Research Center at a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixty-eight single and bilateral lung transplant recipients and 35 healthy controls were enrolled in October and November 2002. METHODS: Each individual underwent blood sampling before receiving the 2002-2003 influenza vaccine and 4 weeks later. Influenza antibody concentrations were measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Vaccine response rates (antibody concentration >40 hemagglutination units and at least 4-fold increase in antibody concentration) were compared using chi2. The influence of specific immunosuppressants on vaccine response was compared. RESULTS: The influenza vaccine response rate for lung transplant recipients was 29/68 (43%) and 22/35 (63%) for the healthy individuals (P < .05; chi2). Among the recipients, mycophenolate mofetil was associated with poorer influenza vaccine antibody response (> 40 hemagglutination units) (62% vs 91%; P = .01), whereas sirolimus (91% vs 63%; P = .02) was associated with better influenza antibody response compared to those not taking mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lung transplant recipients had lower influenza vaccine response rates than healthy individuals. Influenza vaccine antibody response is influenced by concomitant administration of mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Future studies should measure protection from influenza infection conferred by immunization and alternative vaccination strategies.     

Safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients

This Practice Point commentary discusses Scharpé et al.'s single-center, nonrandomized, prospective trial of influenza vaccination in renal transplant recipients. In total, 165 transplant recipients and 41 healthy volunteers were vaccinated with a standard inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (containing strains of the A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B viruses). No rejection episodes or other adverse events were reported in either group. Influenza-specific antibody titers increased in renal transplant recipients following vaccination, as measured by comparison of pre-vaccination and post-vaccination seroprotection and seroresponse rates. This commentary discusses the limitations of the trial, and urges caution in extending the conclusions drawn by Scharpé et al. regarding the safety of the trivalent, non-adjuvant-containing influenza vaccine to newer adjuvant-assisted vaccines. Annual vaccination for influenza by use of the trivalent vaccine strategy without adjuvant should, however, be standard of care for all stable renal transplant recipients who do not have clinical contraindications.     

Immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in renal transplant recipients

To evaluate the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in renal transplant recipients, we administered three 40-microgram doses of vaccine to 17 patients who had previously undergone transplantation and were on immunosuppressive therapy. Life-table analysis revealed a cumulative antibody response rate of only 17.6% at 12 months, and the three responders had low titers of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. There were no serious adverse effects and no episodes of graft rejection in responders or nonresponders. In addition, the ratio of helper/inducer (T4) to suppressor/cytotoxic (T8) T cells in vaccinees bore no relationship to the immunogenicity of the vaccine. These data indicate that hepatitis B vaccine is weakly immunogenic in renal transplant recipients and illustrate the need for vaccination prior to transplantation for maximal protection against hepatitis B virus infection.     

Panel Reactive Antibody Responses Against Influenza Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients

IntroductionSeasonal influenza is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the post-transplant period; therefore, the influenza vaccination has been recommended for all kidney transplant recipients before the influenza season. However, at least theoretically, the introduction of antigens via vaccines may trigger rejection attacks by causing an antibody response. In this study, we examined the development of de novo panel reactive antibody (PRA) development against the influenza vaccine in kidney transplant recipients.Materials and MethodsOverall, 41 kidney transplant recipients who received the influenza vaccination and 50 kidney transplant recipients (study group) who refused to receive the influenza vaccination (control group) were enrolled in the study. Following basal biochemistry examination, the inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine was administered intramuscularly. Panel reactive antibodies were screened in all patients before and after vaccination on days 30 and 180. The primary outcome variable was development of de novo panel reactive antibodies.ResultsOne patient in the study group developed de novo class I and II PRA at 6 months after vaccination (P > .05), while no antibody development was noted in the control group. Graft dysfunction or biopsy-confirmed rejection was not observed during the follow-up period in both groups.ConclusionThe influenza vaccination is generally effective and safe in solid organ transplant recipients. The vaccination procedure has the potential to trigger antibody development and occurrence of rejection. Therefore, vaccinated kidney transplant recipients should be monitored more carefully with regard to PRA; if the graft deteriorates, a rapid transplant biopsy should be performed.     

Safety and efficacy of two types of influenza vaccination in heart transplant recipients: a prospective randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Influenza may cause severe disease in immunosuppressed patients. Different vaccines have been proved to be efficacious to prevent influenza in tranplant recipients. Since the last five years the addition of adjuvants to improve the immune response to vaccine preparations has been proposed and evaluated. In this study, two antigenically identical vaccines, but different for the presence of adjuvants were randomised among a cohort of heart transplant recipients to evaluate their safety and immunogenicity. METHODS: 58 patients, receiving an heart transplant more than 6 months before, were randomised to receive one shoot vaccination with Fluad (containing the MF59 adjuvant) or Agrippal (no adjuvant added) or to enter the control, not-vaccinated, group. The immune response to influenza was evaluated separately for type A and type B viruses and for the IgG and the IgM antibodies. Patients were clinically evaluated at least monthly up to 6 months. RESULTS: Influenza symptoms were reported by 33% of patients receiving Fluad, 29% of the Agrippal and 63% of the control group. 4 episodes of acute myocardial rejection >/=3A were identified without difference between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The superior efficacy of vaccines containing adjuvants was not found and the data clearly confirmed that vaccination against influenza is safe and effective in heart transplant recipients. The use of vaccine containing adjuvant substances do not ameliorate the clinical performance of the immunisation suggesting that less expensive influenza vaccine preparation without adjuvant substances could be equally useful to protect heart transplant recipients.     

Therapy With m‐TOR Inhibitors Decreases the Response to the Pandemic Influenza A H1N1 Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Concern has been raised regarding the response to vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) undergoing immunosuppressant regimens and the possibility of rejection related to the immune response associated with pandemic influenza H1N1–2009 vaccination. The goal of this study was to assess the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of the pandemic vaccine in SOTR. We performed a multicenter prospective study in SOTR receiving the pandemic vaccine. Immunological response was determined in serum 5 weeks after vaccination by microneutralization assays, and immunoglobulins were measured by ELISA. Three hundred and forty‐six SOTR were included. Preexisting seroprotection was detected in 13.6% of cases and rates of seroconversion and seroprotection after vaccination were 73.1% and 82.9%, respectively. Patients with baseline antibody titers had better geometric mean titers (GMT)‐post after pandemic vaccination (339.4 vs. 121.4, p < 0.001). Younger age, liver disease and m‐TOR inhibitor therapy were independently associated with lower seroprotection and GMT‐post. There were no major adverse effects or rejection episodes. Pandemic vaccine was safe in SOTR and elicited an adequate response, although lower than in healthy individuals. This is the first study describing a decreased response after vaccination in patients receiving mTOR inhibitors who presented lower seroprotection rates and lower GMT‐post.     

Clinical implications of respiratory virus infections in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about clinical consequences of respiratory virus infections (RVI) in solid organ transplant recipients. No prospective epidemiological study has been published previously. METHODS: We selected a cohort of 152 transplant recipients (cardiac, hepatic and renal transplant recipients). Median time from transplantation was 17 months (range 1-50). They were prospectively followed-up for RVI during 7 months (October to April). Clinical and microbiological evaluation (cell culture, shell vial and polymerase chain reaction technique) of each RVI episode was made. RESULTS: We detected 81 RVI (0.91 episodes/patient/year). Complications were detected in 15/81 episodes (18.5%): acute bronchitis (10 cases), pneumonia (three cases; 3.7% of RVI episodes) and bacterial sinusitis (2 cases). In 4 of 81 episodes (5%), patients needed hospitalization. A respiratory virus was isolated in 17 of 68 nasopharyngeal samples (six respiratory syncytial virus, six influenza, four picornavirus, one adenovirus). Fever presented an 83% positive predictive value for the diagnosis of influenza virus infection among those with a positive microbiological isolation. There were no episodes of acute rejection coincidentally with RVI. Only 54% of the subjects had been previously vaccinated against influenza. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of RVI among solid organ transplant recipients is similar to general population but complications are higher. A relationship between RVI and rejection was not detected. The rate of influenza vaccination was lower than expected. The presence of fever in a transplant recipient with RVI strongly suggests influenza infection.     

Influenza vaccination does not promote cellular or humoral activation among heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The impact of influenza vaccination on in vitro parameters of cellular and humoral immunity, anti-viral titers, and clinical outcome was evaluated among cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS: Blood was collected from 29 patients before and 3-4 weeks after influenza vaccination and tested for phenotypic changes in lymphoid subpopulations and generation of antibodies against the allograft and vaccine. RESULTS: Vaccination did not change the percentage of lymphoid subpopulations and did not induce generation of anti-HLA alloantibodies. Anti-vaccine response was detected in 12 of 29 patients and did not correlate with rejection history, length of graft survival, or immunosuppressive therapy. Vaccination did not change the frequency of rejection. Flu-like symptoms were reported in one patient but not confirmed microbiologically. CONCLUSION: Despite the small number of patients in the study, influenza vaccination did not induce undesirable side effects, such as graft rejection or allo-sensitization. Generation of a positive anti-vaccine response was lower among the transplant recipients than healthy volunteers (41% vs. 80%). Clinical efficacy of the vaccine among the responders was not evaluated.     

The antibody response to pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza vaccine in adult organ transplant patients

Limited data are available regarding antibody response and the safety of the monovalent influenza A H1N1/09 vaccine for immunocompromised patients. In this study, the humoral response to this vaccine in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and healthy individuals was evaluated. Eighty‐two SOT recipients and 28 healthy individuals received two doses of the influenza A H1N1/09 AS03 adjuvanted vaccine containing 3.75 mg of haemagglutinin at a 3‐ to 4‐week interval. Serum samples were drawn at baseline and 3–4 weeks after the first and second vaccine doses. Seroprotective titres were measured with a haemagglutination inhibition. After the first dose seroprotective titres were observed in 69% of the SOT patients and in 96% of the healthy controls (P = 0.006), and increased after the second dose to 80% and 100%, respectively (P = 0.003). All controls and 77% of the SOT recipients achieved a ≥4‐fold titre rise after the first immunisation (P = 0.005). The vaccine was well tolerated and no acute rejection was observed. Influenza A H1N1/09 vaccine elicited a protective antibody response in the majority of SOT recipients, but the response was lower when compared with controls. A second dose significantly improved vaccine immunogenicity in SOT recipients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01254955)     

Influenza vaccination in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The immunogenicity of the trivalent inactivated influenza split virus vaccine (Infusplit SSW 97/98) containing A/Bayern/07/95 (H1N1)-like (A/Johannesburg/82/96 [NIB-39]), A/Wuhan/359/95 (H3N2)-like (A/Nanchang/933/95 [Resvir-0]), and B/Beijing/184/93-like (B/Harbin/7/94) hemagglutinin antigens was tested in liver transplant recipients (TXL-R). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Serum antibody titers were determined 21+/-2 days after a single vaccination in 62 adult TXL-R and 59 adult volunteers. RESULTS: Protective postimmunization antibody titers for the three antigens were similar in TXL-R (protection rates 92%, 92%, and 95%) and the comparison group (97%, 100%, and 100%). Adverse reactions were mild and less frequent in TXL-R. A significant decrease of CD8+CD38+ lymphocytes after vaccination was found in TXL-R. No association between antibody response and age, gender, time interval since transplantation, anti-hepatitis B surface antigen immunoprophylaxis, or immunosuppressive medication was detected. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the vaccine is safe and effective and should be recommended to TXL-R.     

Influenza and parainfluenza respiratory viral infection requiring admission in adult lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Although influenza and parainfluenza viruses commonly cause respiratory tract infections in the community, their incidence and clinical implications in adult lung transplant recipients have received little attention. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of influenza and parainfluenza viral infections in adult lung transplant recipients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. RESULTS: Between January 1989 and March 1999, 39 cases (single-lung 25, double-lung 14) of influenza or parainfluenza respiratory viral infection were identified at a mean of 1.7 years (SD+/-1.4) after transplantation. The mean length of admission was 7 days. The cases included 15 patients with influenza (A, 11; B, 4) and 24 with parainfluenza (para1, 7; para2, 2; para3, 15). The median age at diagnosis was 48 years; there were 19 females and 20 males. Symptoms were reported in 30 patients and lasted for a median of 7 days before admission. These included cough (64%), shortness of breath (56%), and temperature elevation (33%). Chest infiltrates were seen in 14 (36%) patients, and 5 (13%) of them required intubation and mechanical ventilation. Viral pneumonia was diagnosed in 10 (5 influenza and 5 parainfluenza) patients, and concurrent bacterial pneumonia occurred in 4 patients. Transbronchial biopsy was performed in 36 patients, of whom 23 (64%) showed some degree of acute allograft rejection. CONCLUSION: Influenza and parainfluenza respiratory viral infections are associated with significant morbidity in adult lung transplant recipients. Active vaccination programs and the development of new antiviral agents active against these viruses are important for prevention.     

Influenza Infection in Patients Before and After Liver Transplantation

Infection with influenza virus poses specific problems in pediatric and adult liver transplant recipients, both before and after liver transplantation. These include a higher rate of pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications, development of rejection with graft dysfunction, prolonged shedding of influenza virus, and increased drug-resistance. Hepatic decompensation may occur during influenza infection in patients with cirrhosis. Current prophylaxis includes yearly vaccination with trivalent inactivated vaccine. Appropriate diagnosis and prompt treatment of any upper respiratory infections are indicated in these patients. In this review, we describe a case of influenza viral pneumonia in an adult liver transplant recipient, review basic and clinical aspects of influenza infection in this patient population, and discuss current modes of prevention and treatment in detail. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:531-542.)     

Use of High-Dose Human Immune Globulin in Highly Sensitized Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List: One Center's Experience

Introduction

Transplant rates are low among highly sensitized patients with preformed anti-HLA antibodies, because of the additional immunologic barrier, the increased risk of rejection, and the greater chance of early graft loss. Intravenous infusion of pooled human immune globulin (IVIG) is immunomodulatory, neutralizing circulating antibodies and reducing rejection rates, two factors that may improve long-term transplantation outcomes.

Methods

We selected for high-dose IVIG treatment (1 g/kg monthly for 4 months) 10 adult, stage V, highly HLA-sensitized (PRA, historical >80% and current 56%-100%) chronic kidney disease patients listed for kidney transplantation with a mean waiting time of 7.5 years. They spanned age of 29-52 years. Anti-HLA titers were monitored monthly before each treatment and 1 month after the last IVIG dose; afterwards, patients were placed on an urgent list and followed for their transplant renal function and rejection episodes.

Results

Although 1 subject was transplanted after the first dose of IVIG, 9 patients completed the study, but their PRA decreased only insubstantially, namely, 14.4% (range, 8%-28%). During 6-12 months follow-up, 6 patients were considered for transplantation (negative crossmatch); 5 received kidneys and 1 was disqualified due to infection. The recipients were treated with antithymocyte globulin (n = 3) or basiliximab (n = 2) as well as tacrolimus/mycophenolate/steroids for baseline immunosuppression. Protocol biopsies (months 1, 3, and 6) in 4 patients (1 denied consent) revealed subclinical acute rejection and C4d positivity in most cases, either repeatedly or in the final biopsy. However at 6-12 months the mean serum creatinine concentration averaged 1.5 ± 0.4 mg/dL.

Conclusion

High-dose human IVIG reduced PRA poorly, but short-term transplantation outcomes were encouraging. Surveillance biopsies are advised for sensitized kidney recipients due to the frequent appearance of rejection, particularly of the antibody mediated type.     

Response to an experimental HBV vaccine permits withdrawal of HBIg prophylaxis in fulminant and selected chronic HBV-infected liver graft recipients.

Strategies using lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) for prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT) are expensive since life-long treatment is needed. We evaluated the possibility to obtain protective hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) antibody (anti-HBs) titers after LT and to discontinue HBIg prophylaxis after a reinforced course of vaccination against HBV using an experimental adjuvant HBsAg / AS04 vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals [GSK], Rixensart, Belgium) in patients transplanted for hepatitis B. Fifteen LT patients on stable low-level immunosuppression were vaccinated with a double dose of the vaccine at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 12 months: 5 patients were transplanted for nonviral diseases and 10 patients were transplanted for HBV on HBIg monotherapy. HBIg were continued during baseline vaccination (0, 1, and 2 months) and when anti-HBs titers determined every 6 weeks dropped below 150 IU/L. Overall follow-up was 18 months. Sustained long-term response to vaccination was defined as anti-HBs titers >500 IU/L without further need for HBIg administration during a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Overall sustained response to vaccination was 53% (8 / 15 patients); 80% (4 / 5 patients) in the nonviral disease group and 40% (4 / 10 patients) in the HBV group (2 /2 fulminant and 2/8 chronically infected patients) developed a sustained long-term response and were completely free of HBIg at the end of the 18-month follow-up. No HBV recurrence, rejection episodes, or side effects occurred during the follow-up. In conclusion, protective anti-HBs titers were obtained in a substantial number of LT patients following a reinforced course of HBV vaccination with vaccines containing new immunostimulating adjuvants. Vaccination seems well tolerated and safe and allows long-term discontinuation of HBIg.     

血浆置换治疗对高敏患者肾移植后排斥反应的影响

目的 探讨血浆置换(PE)减少高敏患者肾移植后排斥反应的疗效。方法 46例肾移植前群体反应性抗体(PRA)阳性≥30%(30%～88%)患者,先作血浆置换治疗1～3次后,当PRA<30％才作尸体肾移植作治疗组。30例PRA阳性,强度≥30％(30％～77％)患者进行尸体肾移植作对照组。比较2组患者术后6个月内排斥反应情况。结果 对照组术后排斥反应发生率为63.3％(19/30)。治疗组移植后排斥反应发生率为21.7%(10/46),(P<0.001)。结论 PE治疗能明显减少有预先形成抗体的高敏患者的肾移植后排斥反应,疗效满意。