Recent advances in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma — A review

The current review presents the results of the most recent studies performed on different aspects of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, including radiosensitivity induction, efficiency improvement of monoclonal antibodies using low-intensity ultrasound, chemical compounds such as toll-like receptor (TLC) agonists, dasatinib, resveratrol and niclosamide, nuclear inhibition of cancer using STAT3 decoy oligonucleotide, efficiency of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in detection of head and neck cancers and other related issues.     

Recent advances in delivery of drug–nucleic acid combinations for cancer treatment

Cancer treatment that uses a combination of approaches with the ability to affect multiple disease pathways has been proven highly effective in the treatment of many cancers. Combination therapy can include multiple chemotherapeutics or combinations of chemotherapeutics with other treatment modalities like surgery or radiation. However, despite the widespread clinical use of combination therapies, relatively little attention has been given to the potential of modern nanocarrier delivery methods, like liposomes, micelles, and nanoparticles, to enhance the efficacy of combination treatments. This lack of knowledge is particularly notable in the limited success of vectors for the delivery of combinations of nucleic acids with traditional small molecule drugs. The delivery of drug–nucleic acid combinations is particularly challenging due to differences in the physicochemical properties of the two types of agents. This review discusses recent advances in the development of delivery methods using combinations of small molecule drugs and nucleic acid therapeutics to treat cancer. This review primarily focuses on the rationale used for selecting appropriate drug–nucleic acid combinations as well as progress in the development of nanocarriers suitable for simultaneous delivery of drug–nucleic acid combinations.     

Can lifestyle modification improve neurocognition? Rationale and design of the ENLIGHTEN clinical trial

BackgroundRisk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) not only increase the risk for clinical CVD events, but also are associated with a cascade of neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic changes that increase the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Although epidemiological studies have shown that exercise and diet are associated with lower CVD risk and reduced incidence of dementia, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has examined the independent effects of exercise and diet on neurocognitive function among individuals at risk for dementia. The ENLIGHTEN trial is a RCT of patients with CVD risk factors who also are characterized by subjective cognitive complaints and objective evidence of neurocognitive impairment without dementia (CIND)Study designA 2 by 2 design will examine the independent and combined effects of diet and exercise on neurocognition. 160 participants diagnosed with CIND will be randomly assigned to 6 months of aerobic exercise, the DASH diet, or a combination of both exercise and diet; a (control) group will receive health education but otherwise will maintain their usual dietary and activity habits. Participants will complete comprehensive assessments of neurocognitive functioning along with biomarkers of CVD risk including measures of blood pressure, glucose, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness.ConclusionThe ENLIGHTEN trial will (a) evaluate the effectiveness of aerobic exercise and the DASH diet in improving neurocognitive functioning in CIND patients with CVD risk factors; (b) examine possible mechanisms by which exercise and diet improve neurocognition; and (c) consider potential moderators of treatment, including subclinical CVD.     

Measuring estrogens in women,men, and children: Recent advances 2012–2017

The measurement of estrogens is important for diagnosing and monitoring the health of women, men, and children. For example, for postmenopausal women or women undergoing treatment for breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors, the measurement of extremely low concentrations of estrogens in serum, especially estradiol, is problematic but essential for proper medical care. Achieving superb analytical sensitivity and specificity has been and continues to be a challenge for the clinical laboratory, but is a challenge that is being taken seriously. Focusing on publications from 2012 to 2017, this review will provide an overview of recent research in the development of methods to accurately and precisely measure estrogens, including a variety of estrogen metabolites. Additionally, the latest in clinical research involving estrogen measurement in women, men, and children will be presented to provide an update on the association of estrogens with diseases or conditions such as breast cancer, precocious puberty, infertility, and pregnancy. This research update will provide context as to why estrogen measurement is important and why laboratories are working hard to support the recommendations made by the Endocrine Society regarding estrogen measurement.     

Statin research in critical illness: hampered by poor trial design?

Statin therapy may prevent an excessive inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery. In a recent issue of Critical Care, Morgan and colleagues present data from a well-conducted systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using inflammatory markers as primary outcome measure. They find that pre-operative statin therapy, compared with placebo, may reduce various post-operative markers of systemic inflammation (IL-6, IL-8, C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-alpha). Their ability to make definitive conclusions is limited, however, by the suboptimal methodological quality of the primary studies. Their review suggests that ICU researchers should focus on developing valid surrogate markers and use these to accurately describe the mechanisms and effectiveness of novel therapies before proceeding to large pragmatic trials using mortality as primary outcome.     

The “parallel-cohort RCT”: Novel design aspects and application in the Kids-DOTT trial of pediatric venous thromboembolism

In traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT) designs, patients who are ineligible for randomization are excluded from study participation. However, these patients often constitute an important subgroup of the disease population. By extending existing RCT infrastructure, efforts to evaluate such patients in parallel cohort arms would provide an efficient means of generating multi-center prospective data on natural history, which would facilitate the development of future RCTs involving these subgroups of interest. This brief report discusses principles of the parallel-cohort RCT design, describes the few published trials in which it has been employed, and highlights novel aspects of its use in the Kids-DOTT trial—an ongoing multi-center randomized trial of the duration of anticoagulant therapy for venous thrombosis in children.     

How should adverse events be reported in US clinical trials?: ethical considerations

Research with human subjects, including clinical trials, forms the cornerstone of the development of knowledge on the safety and efficacy of potential drugs and devices. During the conduct of clinical trials, human subjects may experience adverse events ranging from trivial side effects such as mild discomfort to severe complications, including death. Three of the regulatory criteria set forth in the 45 Code of Federal Regulations 46.111 for approval of research(1) focus on risk assessment and minimization of risks. The accurate and full reporting of these adverse events and the assessment of the risk attributable to participation in research are therefore crucial components in the ethical conduct of research.     

Recent advances in the understanding of infectious mononucleosis: are prospects improved for treatment or control?

Symptomatic primary Epstein–Barr virus infection is known more commonly as infectious mononucleosis, an illness known for afflicting adolescents and younger adults as a febrile illness accompanied by pharyngitis and lymphadenopathy. Historically believed to be generally benign, infectious mononucleosis has been linked more recently to increased risks of developing Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple sclerosis. Advances in the understanding of host immune responses to Epstein–Barr virus have begun to elucidate the reasons why younger children typically experience subclinical infection whereas older individuals develop infectious mononucleosis. This review will highlight recent advances in the understanding of primary Epstein–Barr virus infection, and whether prospective treatments or vaccine strategies may affect native infection and its sequelae.     

Recent advances in the understanding of infectious mononucleosis: are prospects improved for treatment or control?

Symptomatic primary Epstein-Barr virus infection is known more commonly as infectious mononucleosis, an illness known for afflicting adolescents and younger adults as a febrile illness accompanied by pharyngitis and lymphadenopathy. Historically believed to be generally benign, infectious mononucleosis has been linked more recently to increased risks of developing Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple sclerosis. Advances in the understanding of host immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus have begun to elucidate the reasons why younger children typically experience subclinical infection whereas older individuals develop infectious mononucleosis. This review will highlight recent advances in the understanding of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection, and whether prospective treatments or vaccine strategies may affect native infection and its sequelae.