Autologous versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

Using the data of the patients in complete remission (CR) up to the age of 45 years included in the EORTC-LG/GIMEMA AML-10 trial we investigated the value of the strategy to perform either an autologous (auto-SCT) or an allogeneic (allo-SCT) stem cell transplantation on an intention to treat basis. Between 1993 and 1999, out of 1198 pts, 822 achieved CR. 734 pts, constituting the study group, received an intensieve consolidation course: 293 had a sibling donor and 441 had not. Allo-SCT and auto-SCT was performed in 68.9% and 55.8%, respectively. Cytogenetics was successfully performed in 446 pts. Risk groups were: good (t(8;21), inv(16)), intermediate (NN or -Y only), bad/very bad (all others). Median follow-up was 4 years. The 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of patients with a donor vs of those without a donor was 52.2% vs 42.2%, p = 0.044; the relapse incidence was 30.4% vs 52.5%, death in first complete remission was 17.4% vs 5.3%, and the survival rate was 58.3% vs 50.8% (p = 0.18). The DFS rates in pts with and without a sibling donor were similar in pts with good or intermediate risk cytogenetics, but 43.4% and 18.4%, respectively, in pts with bad or very bad risk cytogenetics. In younger patients (15-35 yrs), the difference was more pronounced. The strategy to perform an allo-SCT in patients where a family donor was available led to better overall results than to perform an auto-SCT, especially for younger patients or those with bad or very bad risk cytogenetics.     

Treatment of children with acute myeloid leukaemia who relapsed after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, 30–40% of children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) experience relapse. For those who relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT), the prognosis is particularly poor, with limited reported literature on these patients. We reviewed the clinical course of 49 children with AML (28 males, 21 females) who received allo‐HSCT between 1993 and 2011, and who had subsequently relapsed. Study endpoints included (i) complete remission (CR) rate after intensive chemotherapy, and prognostic factors for CR, (ii) disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who achieved CR and (iii) OS for recipients of intensive chemotherapy and prognostic factors for OS . Of the 36 patients who received intensive chemotherapy after post‐HSCT relapse, 26 (72%) achieved CR. For patients who achieved CR, 5‐year DFS and OS were 32·6 ± 10·2% and 44·4 ± 11·1%, respectively. For all recipients of intensive chemotherapy, 5‐year OS was 31·6 ± 8·7%. Cumulative incidence of treatment‐related death was 14·4%. All three recipients of second HSCT died. Amongst prognostic factors predicting improved survival, only disease status at HSCT (early first CR vs. others) proved significant in multivariate study (Hazard Ratio 2·42, 95% Confidence Interval 1·02–5·74, P = 0·045). Treatment with curative intent was able to salvage a minor but important subset of children with AML who relapsed post‐allogeneic transplant.     

髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植后髓外复发的危险因素分析

目的:探讨髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后髓外复发的危险因素及治疗策略。方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2018年12月河南省肿瘤医院280例行allo-HSCT髓系白血病患者的临床资料,分析患者性别、原发病、移植前疾病状态、染色体、预处理方案、供者类型、移植前髓外浸润、移植物抗宿主病等指标。应用log-rank检验方法进行单因素分析,Cox比例风险模型进行多因素分析。结果:280例患者中髓外复发20例,复发率为7.14%(20/280),中位时间为移植后7.5(1~123)个月。髓外复发患者16例死亡,病死率80%(16/20)。单因素分析中,疾病类别、第2次完全缓解(CR2)/进展期、移植前髓外浸润、预处理不含全身放疗、染色体异常与髓外复发显著相关(P<0.05)。Cox回归显示,CR2/进展期(RR=3.468,95%CI 2.189~7.786)、染色体异常(RR=1.494,95%CI 1.020~2.189)、移植前髓外浸润(RR=8.627,95%CI 3.921~18.452)为髓外复发的独立危险因素。结论:髓系白血病allo-HSCT后髓外复发的预后较差,联合治疗可能延长患者的生存期,早期评估预防至关重要。     

Clinical activity of azacitidine in patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Disease relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, yet treatment options for such patients remain extremely limited. Azacitidine is an important new therapy in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia but its role in patients who relapse post allograft has not been defined. We studied the tolerability and activity of azacitidine in 181 patients who relapsed after an allograft for acute myeloid leukemia (n=116) or myelodysplastic syndromes (n=65). Sixty-nine patients received additional donor lymphocyte infusions. Forty-six of 157 (25%) assessable patients responded to azacitidine therapy: 24 (15%) achieved a complete remission and 22 a partial remission. Response rates were higher in patients transplanted in complete remission (P=0.04) and those transplanted for myelodysplastic syndromes (P=0.023). In patients who achieved a complete remission, the 2-year overall survival was 48% versus 12% for the whole population. Overall survival was determined by time to relapse post transplant more than six months (P=0.001) and percentage of blasts in the bone marrow at time of relapse (P=0.01). The concurrent administration of donor lymphocyte infusion did not improve either response rates or overall survival in patients treated with azacitidine. An azacitidine relapse prognostic score was developed which predicted 2-year overall survival ranging from 3%–37% (P=0.00001). We conclude that azacitidine represents an important new therapy in selected patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Prospective studies to confirm optimal treatment options in this challenging patient population are required.     

Risk factors for relapse after allogeneic transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia is a clonal neoplasm derived from myeloid progenitor cells with a varying outcome. The initial goal of treatment is the achievement of complete remission, defined for over 40 years by morphology. However, without additional post-remission treatment the majority of patients relapse. In many cases of acute myeloid leukemia, allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers the best prospects of cure. In 2013, 5608 stem cell transplantations in acute myeloid leukemia were performed in Europe (5228 allogeneic and 380 autologous stem cell transplantations). Most stem cell transplantations are performed in first complete remission. However, despite a considerable reduction in the chance of relapse, in most studies, overall survival benefit of allogeneic stem cell transplantation is modest due to substantial non-relapse mortality. Here we discuss the many factors related to the risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.     

Successful immunotherapy in early relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We report on a 35-year-old woman who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in second complete remission (CR) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and 2 Gy of total body irradiation. For graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, cyclosporin A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were given. On day 27 after SCT complete hematological remission and donor chimerism was documented. However, in CD34(+) bone marrow cells 28% of recipient hematopoiesis persisted. On day +59 leukemic relapse occurred. After discontinuation of CsA and onset of GVHD, complete donor chimerism and hematological CR were achieved which has been maintained for 14 months.     

Role of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

Most younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia will enter remission of disease. Prevention of relapse is now the central therapeutic issue. A number of factors predict the risk of relapse, the most powerful of which is cytogenetics. Both allogeneic and autologous transplantation have been extensively used as remission consolidation, but intensive chemotherapy has also provided improved results such that the choice of consolidation treatment is not clear. Recent prospective trials of allogeneic and autologous transplantation with careful analysis have not always shown a survival benefit, although both approaches have significantly reduced relapse risk. In analysis where relapse risk is taken into account based on cytogenetics, there is little evidence of the benefit of transplantation in good-risk patients, partly because patients in this group who relapse can then undergo successful salvage therapy. The results are still uncertain in standard-risk patients, so transplantation should continue to be used in the context of a trial. Poor-risk patients have a higher failure rate after transplantation, and for these patients novel approaches are required.     

Neoplastic meningitis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia scheduled for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We analyzed the frequency of neoplastic meningitis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at our institution. Between 1996 and 2009, cerebrospinal fluid samples of 204 adult patients were examined during pre-transplant work-up for cell counts and, if abnormal, morphologically. We found blasts in cerebrospinal fluid samples of 17 patients with either persistent (n=9) or newly diagnosed (n=8) neoplastic meningitis. All patients proceeded to transplant. The proportion of patients with central nervous system involvement was significantly higher in patients with refractory disease at the time of transplantation compared with patients responding to prior systemic therapy (19% vs. 4.6%; P=0.003). Since most of the patients with central nervous system involvement were asymptomatic, cerebrospinal fluid evaluation should be considered at least in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia.     

Current status of reduced-intensity-conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the most efficient antileukemic treatment for acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML). However, elderly patients can rarely benefit from standard myeloablative allo-SCT because of an unacceptable rate of procedure-related toxicities. This point is critical when considering AML patients in first complete remission. The development of the so-called reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens appears to decrease allo-SCT-related toxicities, and has emerged as an attractive modality in AML patients not eligible for standard allo-SCT. Such RIC regimens aim primarily to provide the immune graft-versus-leukemia effect while causing little toxicity. Of note, treatment-related toxicity appears to be lower with RIC regimens as compared to standard myeloablative regimens. Nevertheless, toxicity might represent only one aspect of the problem, since AML encompasses a group of chemosensitive diseases, raising concerns that significant reduction of the intensity of the preparative regimen may have a negative impact on long-term leukemic control. Furthermore, no prospective studies have been reported thus far establishing RIC allo-SCT as the preferred option in AML. Investigators are currently faced with a dilemma on how to optimize the potential role of RIC allo-SCT in AML patients, while delivering minimal myeloablation and maximizing allogeneic immunotherapy. The aim of this review is to analyze the available research evidence in this field.     

Maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

With improvements in the safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, disease recurrence following the procedure is now the most frequent reason for treatment failure. Administration of maintenance therapy after transplantation is one way to try and prevent recurrence. This paper provides a brief review of the topic.     

Utility of a prognostic scoring system for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is the treatment of choice for selected patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, it is associated with a high risk of treatment-related mortality (TRM) and morbidity. To assist in decision making about transplantation, a simple scoring system to assess the risk is needed. We analyzed the utility of a scoring system, first reported by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). We analyzed the data from 31 patients who underwent allogeneic transplantation at our institution, using the EBMT scoring system. It was based on five pretransplant risk factors: donor type, stage of disease at time of transplantation, age of recipient, sex of donor and recipient, and interval between diagnosis and transplant. Seventeen patients had a risk score of 0-2, and 14 patients had a score of 3-7. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the estimated 4-year leukemia-free (LFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with a score of 0-2 were 47 and 53%, respectively. In contrast, the estimated 4-year LFS and OS for patients with a score of 3-7 were 10.5 and 10.5%, respectively. Four-year TRM was 47% for the low-risk group (0-2), and 85% for the high-risk group (3- 7). This simple scoring system may play an important role in predicting the outcome of allogeneic SCT, and in choosing the appropriate therapy for patients with CML.