Early assessment of dental arch development in repaired unilateral cleft lip and unilateral cleft lip and palate versus controls.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dental arch relationships and dimensions, relative to an age matched noncleft sample, in Caucasian 3-year-old children with repaired unilateral cleft lip (UCL) or unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional, case-control study performed in Scotland, U.K. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven children with repaired unilateral cleft lip, 16 children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate, and 78 children as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dental arch relationships and linear arch dimensions. RESULTS: Prevalence of Class III incisor relationship was 31.3% in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate compared with 9.1% in children with unilateral cleft lip. A buccal crossbite was present in 36% of children with unilateral cleft lip, compared with 75.6% of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.Mean linear maxillary arch dimensions did not differ significantly between children with unilateral cleft lip and the controls. Except for second intermolar width, statistically significant differences existed in mean linear maxillary arch dimensions between the unilateral cleft lip and the unilateral cleft lip and palate groups; the mean linear maxillary arch dimensions were significantly greater in the control group than in the unilateral cleft lip and palate group. The mean cleft-affected anterior quadrant length appeared to be the arch dimension with the greatest power of discrimination among the three groups. There were no significant differences in mean linear mandibular arch dimensions among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior crossbite was almost three times more common in the unilateral cleft lip and palate group than in the unilateral cleft lip group. Mean linear maxillary arch dimensions differed significantly between the unilateral cleft lip and palate group and the control group. There were no significant differences in mean linear maxillary arch dimensions between unilateral cleft lip and controls or between mean linear mandibular arch dimensions for unilateral cleft lip, unilateral cleft lip and palate, and controls.     

Sizes of dental arches and general body growth up to 6 years of age in children with isolated cleft palate.

Development of the dental arches and height and weight at the ages of 3 yr and 6 yr were studied longitudinally in 60 children with isolated cleft palate (CP) and in 50 noncleft (NONC) children. Retrospective comparisons were also made in the CP group with arch size at the age of 0.2 yr and 1.8 yr. Anterior width at 0.2 yr of age was associated with canine width at the age of 3 yr (r = 0.70) and 6 yr (r = 0.60). Change in maxillary posterior width from 3 yr to 6 yr of age was related to the extension of the cleft, so that in the group with total cleft this dimension diminished. Measured in standard deviation scores (SDS), the means of maxillary width at canines and primary second molars in CP children varied from -1.0 to -2.0 and mandibular dimensions from -0.6 to -1.4. Discrepancy in arch depth diminished with age. Body size differed less from normal than the size of the dental arches. At 3 yr of age the height was -0.4 SDS in CP boys and -0.5 SDS in CP girls, but at 6 yr of age only -0.1 SDS in both boys and girls. Correlations between body size and the size of the dental arches were generally low (r less than 0.20) both in CP and NONC children. The small size of the dental arches in CP children does not seem to be merely a reflection of the overall smaller size of CP children.     

Sizes of dental arches and general body growth up to 6 years of age in children with isolated cleft palate

Development of the dental arches and height and weight at the ages of 3 yr and 6 yr were studied longitudinally in 60 children with isolated cleft palate (CP) and in 50 noncleft (NONC) children. Retrospective comparisons were also made in the CP group with arch size at the age of 0.2 yr and 1.8 yr. Anterior width at 0.2 yr of age was associated with canine width at the age of 3 yr (r = 0.70) and 6 yr (r = 0.60). Change in maxillary posterior width from 3 yr to 6 yr of age was related to the extension of the cleft, so that in the group with total cleft this dimension diminished. Measured in standard deviation scores (SDS), the means of maxillary width at canines and primary second molars in CP children varied from −1.0 to −2.0 and mandibular dimensions from -0.6 to -1.4. Discrepancy in arch depth diminished with age. Body size differed less from normal than the size of the dental arches. At 3 yr of age the height was −0.4 SDS in CP boys and −0.5 SDS in CP girls, but at 6 yr of age only −0.1 SDS in both boys and girls. Correlations between body size and the size of the dental arches were generally low (r < 0.20) both in CP and NONC children. The small size of the dental arches in CP children does not seem to be merely a reflection of the overall smaller size of CP children.     

The influence of unilateral cleft lip and palate on maxillary dental arch morphology.

A sample of 97 untreated cleft lip and palate adult patients, with and without Simonart's band, was analyzed. The dimensions and form of the maxillary dental arches were analyzed. Comparison of this sample with a "normal" group indicated maxillary dental arch size and shape are distorted by the presence of a cleft which is characterized by a constriction that becomes more severe in the medial and anterior regions. The presence of Simonart's band affects the cleft arch form, redirecting the anterior extremity of the major segment towards the minor segment.     

唇腭裂患者牙槽突裂植骨术前使用半固定式四眼圈簧扩大上牙弓的正畸治疗

目的探讨半固定式四眼圈簧矫治器对伴有上牙弓狭窄的唇腭裂患者的扩弓效果。方法选择15例需行牙槽突裂植骨术的唇腭裂患者,术前正畸治疗先采用半固定式四眼圈簧矫治器扩大上牙弓,测量扩弓前、中、后的上颌左右尖牙、第一前磨牙、第一磨牙间宽度的变化。结果经过半固定式四眼圈簧矫治器扩弓治疗的患者,均在5个月左右的时间内有效地扩大了上牙弓。正畸治疗后上牙弓扩大,牙齿排列基本整齐,为牙槽突裂植骨术提供了良好的条件。结论半固定式四眼圈簧矫治器可有效扩大唇腭裂患者的上牙弓,同时配合固定正畸治疗,疗效确切,使用方便。     

Symmetry and combinations of hypodontia in non-cleft and cleft palate children

Symmetry and combinations of hypodontia was studied and compared in non-cleft (NONC) and cleft palate (CP) groups with different prevalences of hypodontia. The NONC group included 300 children with one or more congenitally absent permanent teeth, excluding the third molars, and 79 children with isolated cleft palate without accessory anomalies. There were no significant differences between the groups in distribution of children with agenesis of 1 to 11 teeth. Bilateral agenesis increased with increasing number of absent teeth per child, and it was more frequent in the maxillary teeth of the NONC group and in the mandibular teeth of the CP group. Concomitant agenesis was observed in one to four different dental fields per child, and the distribution of the subjects was similar in both groups. We conclude that the symmetry of agenesis may be dependent on the population frequency of hypodontia and on the number of absent teeth per child. The agenesis in the CP group may have a common genetic basis, but the substantially higher incidence of hypodontia in the maxilla is likely caused by factors similar to those causing the cleft itself.     

Symmetry and combinations of hypodontia in non-cleft and cleft palate children

Abstract — Symmetry and combinations of hypodontia was studied and compared in non-cleft (NONC) and cleft palate (CP) groups with different prevalences of hypodontia. The NONC group included 300 children with one or more congenitally absent permanent teeth, excluding the third molars, and 79 children with isolated cleft palate without accessory anomalies. There were no significant differences between the groups in distribution of children with agenesis of 1 to 11 teeth. Bilateral agenesis increased with increasing number of absent teeth per child, and it was more frequent in the maxillary teeth of the NONC group and in the mandibular teeth of the CP group. Concomitant agenesis was observed in one to four different dental fields per child, and the distribution of the subjects was similar in both groups. We conclude that the symmetry of agenesis may be dependent on the population frequency of hypodontia and on the number of absent teeth per child. The agenesis in the CP group may have a common genetic basis, but the substantially higher incidence of hypodontia in the maxilla is likely caused by factors similar to those causing the cleft itself.     

Dental arches in six-year-old children with operated and unoperated submucous cleft palate and isolated cleft palate

The sizes of dental arches in 129 children with cleft palate were evaluated retrospectively from dental casts taken at the mean age 6.2 years (range 5.2-7.5). The material included 61 children with submucous cleft palate (SMCP) and 68 children with isolated cleft palate (ICP). Twenty of the children with SMCP were not operated on, while 41 had had surgical treatment, either palatal repair (n = 16, mean age at operation: 1.6 years, range 0.8-3.9) or pharyngeal flap (VPP) surgery (n = 25, mean age at operation: 4.5 years, range 2.6-6.2). In children with ICP, one-stage hard-palate and soft-palate closure had been done at the mean age of 1.5 years (range 1.0-2.1). Decreased maxillary intermolar widths were seen in children with SMCP after VPP, and especially after palatal repair. The children with ICP had the smallest maxillary dental arch widths. No significant differences were observed in the maxillary arch length or mandibular intermolar arch dimensions in children with SMCP or ICP. Surgery is associated with decreased maxillary intermolar arch widths in children with SMCP. Children with ICP had smaller maxillary dental arch widths than children SMCP.     

Dental arches in submucous cleft palate: comparison of six-year-old boys with unoperated submucous cleft palate, with operated cleft of the soft palate, and without a cleft

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dental arch dimensions in 6-year-old boys with unoperated submucous cleft palate (SMCP), and to compare their dental arch dimensions with those of boys without clefts and boys with clefts of the soft palate (CP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sizes of dental arches in 97 boys were compared retrospectively from dental casts taken at a mean age of 6.4 years (range 5.2-8.4). The material included 34 boys without clefts, 30 with unoperated SMCP, and 33 with CP. In children with CP, palatal closure had been done by the pushback technique at a mean age of 1.5 years. RESULTS: The dental arch dimensions of the boys with SMCP were similar to those of boys without clefts, except for a decreased maxillary arch length. There was no difference in maxillary arch length between the boys with SMCP and those with CP. The boys with CP had smaller maxillary and mandibular dental arch widths than the boys without clefts and with SMCP. There were no differences in the number of boys with permanent incisors between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Six-year-old boys with unoperated SMCP have similar dental arch dimensions as boys without clefts, except for a decreased maxillary arch length.     

A comparison of growth impairment and orthodontic results in adult patients with clefts of palate and unilateral clefts of lip, palate and alveolus

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the long-term aesthetic and functional results of surgical and orthodontic treatment in patients with cleft palate and unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus. DESIGN: 30 patients with unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus and 30 patients with isolated cleft palate, mean age of 18.9 years, were evaluated by cephalometric and model analysis a mean of 1.5 years after orthodontic treatment. In each group the surgical treatment has been similar. RESULTS: Model analysis: The sum of every mesiodistal tooth diameter in the maxilla and in the mandible was recorded according to the Bolton analysis. Twenty patients with unilateral cleft lip, palate and alveolus had relatively large upper dental arches and nine had relatively large lower dental arches. Twenty-two patients with cleft palates had large upper dental arches and seven had large mandibular arches. Eleven patients with unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus and 18 patients with cleft palate had a negative space supply (the sum of the mesiodistal tooth diameters compared with the sagittal length of the alveolar ridge) in the region of the lateral teeth. All patients had persistent transverse space deficits that were increased on the side of the cleft in patients with cleft lip, palate, and alveolus. These unilateral transversal space deficits were recorded in 22 patients with unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus and in 8 patients with isolated cleft palate. Sagittal measurements were reduced in 26 patients with unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus and in 23 patients with cleft palate alone. The alveolar midline of the maxilla and the mandible were displaced in 25 patients with unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus and in 19 patients with isolated cleft palate. Lateral cephalometric analysis: The lateral cephalograms taken at the same time as the models showed a mean SNA of 76.8 degrees and a NL-NSL angle of 8.7 degrees, indications of a tendency towards maxillary retrognathia in patients with unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus. Patients with cleft palate had a mean SNA of 79.6 degrees and NL-NSL angle of 8.1 degrees. The anterior facial vertical index was within normal limits in patients with cleft lip, palate, and alveolus (44% vs 56%). An anterior facial height index of 42% compared with 58% in patients with isolated cleft palate indicated a slight reduction in midface height with an increase in the lower face as a consequence. CONCLUSION: Orthodontic and surgical treatment can result in satisfactory results on model analysis. However, there is specific growth impairment of the maxilla 1.5 years after termination of orthodontic treatment and this influences the final cephalometric analysis, particularly in patients with cleft lip, palate, and alveolus.     

Primary alveolar cleft bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate: arch dimensions at age 8.

The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether primary alveolar cleft bone grafting in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (N = 17) leads to less favorable dental arch dimensions at age 8 when compared with other 8-year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who received no alveolar bone grafting procedures (N = 49). Dental casts were obtained for the primary grafted group, and arch lengths and widths were digitally recorded with a reflex microscope. These arch dimensions were then compared with the reported data for a nongrafted group and a noncleft group of 8-year-old children. The major findings were: 1) that the dental arches of both cleft groups generally demonstrated a significant diminution in length and width (P < 0.05) compared with the noncleft groups, and 2) that the patients who underwent primary alveolar cleft bone grafting showed no statistically significant difference for any arch dimension (P < 0.05) when compared with the nongrafted group lacking this additional surgical procedure.     

Long-term evaluation of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients after early secondary closure and premaxilla repositioning

The aim of this retrospective, mixed longitudinal study was to assess the long-term outcome of early secondary closure and premaxilla osteotomy in 40 bilateral cleft lip and palate patients who underwent early secondary osteotomy of the premaxilla and bone grafting at the age of 8-12 years. Clinical and cephalometric evaluations of profile, lip relation, nasolabial angle and position of the maxilla preoperatively, postoperatively and at adolescence were compared to normal values of non-cleft individuals and the reported data of 90 bilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated in Oslo. In 68% of patients the profile was considered acceptable, but in 26 maxillary growth appeared to be impaired by cephalometric standards. In four patients a Le Fort I osteotomy was carried out and nine patients would have benefited from such a procedure. This study reveals a trend towards maxillary growth retardation partially compensated by orthodontic and dental treatment. Since the results are comparable to those reported for the Oslo group with regard to maxillary growth, the surgical protocol followed does not require revision. Considering the benefits, i.e. closure of alveolo-palatal cleft, continuity of dental arch, eruption of canine in the graft and closure of oro-nasal communications, this mode of treatment should be continued.     

The relationship between arch dimensions and the 5-year index in the primary dentition of patients with complete UCLP.

OBJECTIVE: To compare dental arch dimensions of children in the primary dentition with repaired unilateral clefts of the lip and palate (UCLP) to a noncleft group of a similar age and determine how the dimensions of the cleft arches relate to an index of treatment outcome. METHOD: Dental study casts of 44 5- to 6-year-olds with complete UCLP (22 boys and 22 girls) from a single center, whose primary surgery had been carried out by one surgeon, were matched for age, sex, and ethnicity with dental study casts from a longitudinal growth study. Analysis of variance was used to ascertain differences in arch dimensions between the two groups. The cleft group casts were then assessed with an established index of surgical outcome, the 5-year-old index. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to see how the arch dimensions of the cleft group related to the categories of the index. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary arch dimensions were significantly smaller in the cleft group than in the noncleft group, irrespective of sex (p < .05). In the mandibular arch, there was no difference between the cleft and noncleft groups (p > .05). Maxillary arch dimensions of the cleft group correlated significantly with the 5-year-old index for arch length and intercanine width (p < .05) but not intermolar width (p = .842). This would suggest that the 5-year-old index is a suitable tool for assessing the outcome of treatment in the primary dentition for anteroposterior and anterior transverse arch dimensions.     

Changes in occlusion and maxillary dental arch dimensions in adults with treated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a follow-up study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occlusion and maxillary dental arch dimensions in adults with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and to investigate the patterns of change in early adulthood. Study models from 39 patients (25 men, 14 women; mean age 24.7 years, range 20.2-29.3 years) with a diagnosis of complete UCLP taken at a follow-up examination were analysed and compared with the study models taken at baseline examination (mean age 19.1 years, range 16.0-20.6 years). Lip closure was carried out according to the Millard technique and palatal closure according to the Wardill-Kilner technique. All patients had received orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of retention in the upper arch: no retention (n = 15), retention with a bonded twisted retainer (n = 13), an onlay or fixed bridge (n = 11). Occlusion was evaluated according to a scoring system. The maxillary dental arch dimensions were measured with a video imaging system. There was a significant deterioration in the total occlusal score during the follow-up period and this was larger on the cleft than on the non-cleft side. There were no significant differences in the anterior scores. A comparison of the transversal and sagittal maxillary arch dimensions revealed significant differences in all measurements during the follow-up interval. The reduction was largest for the maxillary second premolar width, followed by the first molar width. The overjet differed significantly between the registrations. The occlusal score and the maxillary arch dimensions were reduced in all of the three subgroups, but there were no differences between the groups.     

Infant orthopedics has no effect on maxillary arch dimensions in the deciduous dentition of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft).

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of infant orthopedics on maxillary arch dimensions in the deciduous dentition in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. DESIGN: Prospective two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial with three participating cleft palate centers. SETTING: Cleft palate centers of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Academic Center of Dentistry Amsterdam, and University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (n = 54) were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Half of the patients (IO+) had a presurgical orthopedic plate until surgical closure of the soft palate at the age of 52 weeks; the other half (IO-) did not undergo presurgical orthopedics. MEAN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maxillary arch dimensions were assessed on dental casts at 4 and 6 years of age with measurements for arch width, arch depth, arch length, arch form, and the vertical position of the lesser segment. Contact and collapse were assessed also. RESULTS: There were no clinically significant differences found between IO+ and IO- for any of the variables. CONCLUSIONS: Infant orthopedics had no observable effect on the maxillary arch dimensions or on the contact and collapse scores in the deciduous dentition at the ages of 4 and 6 years. Considering the Dutchcleft results to date, there is no need to perform infant orthopedics for unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.     

Retrognathic maxilla in individuals born with oral clefts is due to intrinsic factors and not only due to early surgical treatment

ObjectivesTo determine if the skeletal form of individuals born with oral clefts was associated with maxillary position.Materials and MethodsLateral cephalometric radiographs of 90 individuals 8 to 12 years old born with or without cleft lip and palate paired by age and sex were used. Skull base length, cranial base angle, cranial deflection angle, and maxillary skeletal length and position were studied. Also, mandibular skeletal length and position, lower anterior facial height, and dental position were defined. Individuals were divided into three groups: 30 individuals born with cleft lip and palate with Class III malocclusion (UCLP Class III), 30 individuals born with cleft lip and palate with Class I malocclusion (UCLP Class I), and 30 individuals born without cleft lip and palate with Class III malocclusion (non-cleft Class III).ResultsWhen comparing the UCLP Class III group with the UCLP Class I group, there were differences in maxillary position (P < .001) and mandibular position (P = .004) found. No differences were found when comparing the UCLP Class III group with the non-cleft Class III group.ConclusionsThere are intrinsic factors that affect craniofacial morphology of individuals born with cleft lip and palate.     

Dental arch dimensions in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

In this investigation, dental arch dimensions during different ages were studied in 72 children with unilateral cleft of the lip, alveolar process, and palate and were compared with those of normal children. All the children with clefts were treated surgically by surgeons of the Lancaster Cleft Palate Clinic. The dental arch dimensions were studied with the use of dental casts during the time of full deciduous dentition (3 to 4 years of age), mixed dentition (8 to 9 years of age), and permanent dentition (12 years of age). The major findings were: (1) all maxillary interdental widths and lengths were significantly smaller than the normal dimensions at all ages, except for intermolar width at age 12 years; and (2) the mandibular arch dimensions seemed to be related to changes in the maxillary arch; however, the influence of surgical procedures in the maxillary arch is not reflected severely in mandibular arch dental position.     

Relapse tendency in maxillary arch width in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with different maxillary arch forms.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relapse tendency in the maxillary dental arch widths in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with different types of maxillary arch form. SUBJECTS: Thirty-two unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated by one-stage surgical palatal closure were included. The subjects were divided into three groups according to the types of the maxillary arch forms: group A, symmetrical arch form; group B, collapse of minor segment; group C, collapse of both segments. METHODS: Using dental casts obtained at three different times, relapse in the intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths in each group was assessed and differences between groups were investigated. Results: Patients in group A showed stable results in all measurements. Patients in group B showed posttreatment relapse in the intercanine width only, whereas patients in group C demonstrated significant posttreatment relapses in the interpremolar and intermolar widths. Comparison between groups showed more significant relapse in the interpremolar and intermolar widths of group C than in those of group B. CONCLUSION: The types of the maxillary arch forms in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients might play a stronger role in the stability of the maxillary dental arch widths after orthodontic treatment in patients with collapse of both segments and a severe degree of maxillary narrowness.     

替牙期骨性Ⅲ类单侧完全性唇腭裂患者修复术后口周力的分布特征

目的:通过与同龄非唇腭裂正常 儿童比较,研究替牙期骨性Ⅲ类单侧完全性唇腭裂(unilateral cleft lip and palate,UCLP)患者上下颌不同位点口周力的特征。 方法:选取替牙期6～12岁UCLP患者20例(男14例,女6例)为UCLP组;同龄正常 儿童21例(男14例,女7例)为对照组。采用口周肌压力采集系统测量每个研究对象息止 位时双侧上下颌中切牙、尖牙或乳尖牙、第一前磨牙或乳磨牙、第一恒磨牙的唇颊、舌腭侧龈缘的口周力。使用SPSS 25.0统计软件对数据进行统计分析。 结果:1．UCLP组上颌口周力裂侧大于非裂侧( P<0.05),下颌口周力两侧无差异( P>0.05)。2. UCLP组上颌口周力大于对照组( P<0.05),两组上颌唇颊侧的口周力均在第一前磨牙/乳磨牙区最大,在中切牙区最小。3. UCLP组下颌唇颊侧口周力小于对照组( P<0.01),下颌中切牙舌侧区UCLP组大于对照组( P<0.05)。4. UCLP组上颌牙弓内外口周力差值大于对照组( P<0.05),下颌差值小于对照组( P<0.01)。 结论:替牙期骨性Ⅲ类UCLP患者口周力较同龄非唇腭裂正常 儿童存在异常。