Polypharmacy in hospitalized older adult cancer patients: Experience from a prospective,observational study of an Oncology-Acute care for elders unit

Background: A novel Oncology-Acute Care for Elders (OACE) unit that uses an interdisciplinary team to enhance recognition and management of geriatric syndromes in hospitalized older adult cancer patients has been established at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St. Louis, Missouri). The OACE team includes a clinical pharmacist whose primary role is to improve the appropriateness of prescribing.Objective: Using polypharmacy as the prototypical geriatric syndrome addressed by the OACE team, the objective of this study was to document the processes of communication of an interdisciplinary team and the impact on polypharmacy when the treating physician did not participate in the daily interdisciplinary team rounds.Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of older cancer patients admitted to the OACE unit. We tracked processes and outcomes of interdisciplinary communication regarding medications by prospectively recording OACE team recommendations and evaluating the frequency of implementation of these recommendations through a chart review. Treating physicians, who did not attend team rounds, received these recommendations on a communication form placed in the patient's chart.Results: Forty–seven patients were included in the study. The mean (SD) age was 73.5 (7.5) years. Twenty–one percent (10/47) of patients were prescribed ≥1 Beers medication as part of their home-care regimen before admission to the OACE unit. The OACE team made 51 medication recommendations, and 42 of those recommendations (82%) were implemented. Twenty–five patients (53%) had an alteration in their medication regimen; 13 (28%) had a potentially inappropriate medication discontinued. A medication error was corrected in ~1 of every 8 patients (6/47 [13%]).Conclusions: We found that polypharmacy was common in older cancer patients and increased during hospitali-zation. We also found that most OACE team recommendations communicated to physicians were implemented even though the primary physicians were not members of the OACE team. Future randomized trials are needed to assess the impact of the OACE team model of care on adverse events, survival, and cost in hospitalized older adult cancer patients.     

The impact of interprofessional collaboration on nurses’ satisfaction and comfort with intranasal fentanyl

BackgroundHealthcare providers’ beliefs and comfort with analgesics can impact medication decisions. Interprofessional educational interventions (IPE) improve medication delivery processes ultimately resulting in better patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact on nurses’ satisfaction and comfort with administering intranasal fentanyl for pediatric pain management in the Emergency Department (ED) before and following IPE.MethodsA protocol for administering intranasal fentanyl for children age 1–15 years with acute pain was introduced to the ED Nursing staff by an educational session conducted by a clinical pharmacist. Nurses’ level of satisfaction and comfort was surveyed prior to and following IPE. Compliance with patient monitoring was determined by chart review.ResultsEighty percentage of the nurses were very satisfied with the analgesic effect of intranasal fentanyl but barriers for its use included personal comfort, nurse monitoring time and age appropriateness. Most nurses felt comfortable administering intranasal fentanyl but showed increased comfort with intravenous morphine (83% versus 98%, p < 0.05). Benefits cited by nurses included having a pharmacist available in the ED to assist in the delivery of intranasal fentanyl.ConclusionThe use of IPE facilitated knowledge sharing to improve nurses’ comfort with administering analgesic medication and the quality of patient care services.     

Impact of the clinical pharmacist on readmission in patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported a positive impact of pharmacists on care of patients with chronic illnesses. The impact of the clinical pharmacist on hospital readmission in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has yet to be evaluated, as of this writing. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the clinical pharmacist as a direct patient-care team member on cardiac-related readmission in patients admitted to the general cardiology unit with ACS. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized observational study compared patients who received standard practice care with patients admitted to a service with a clinical pharmacist to provide care at the bedside. Patients admitted to and discharged from the general cardiology unit for ACS were included. The primary endpoint of the study was cardiac-related readmission at 30 days following hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included length of stay and medication utilization. Interventions provided by the clinical pharmacist in the study group were documented. RESULTS: Cardiac readmission at 30 days was similar between the groups (p = 0.59). In the subset of patients with unstable angina, readmission in the study group was significantly lower than in the control group (1.3% vs 9.1%; p = 0.04). Patients in both groups were similarly managed using drug therapy and invasive coronary interventions. The medical staff's rate of acceptance of recommendations provided by the pharmacist was 94.4%. The most common interventions were medication education and identification of indicated therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of pharmacists did not decrease readmission in patients with ACS. The finding of significant reduction in readmission in the subset of patients with unstable angina should be considered "hypothesis generating" for future randomized studies to confirm the results.     

Applicability of an adapted medication appropriateness index for detection of drug-related problems in geriatric inpatients

BackgroundHigh drug consumption by older patients and the presence of many drug-related problems require careful assessment of drug therapy, for which a structured approach is recommended.ObjectiveThe purpose of our study was to evaluate the applicability of an adapted version of the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) in 50 geriatric inpatients at the time of admission.MethodsWe reviewed, for 432 prescribed drugs, indication, right choice, dosage, directions, drug–disease interactions, drug–drug interactions, and duration of therapy. In addition, adverse drug reactions were evaluated, resulting in 8 questions per drug. MAI scores were attributed independently by a geriatrician and by a clinical pharmacist, and differences between them were assessed. Furthermore, the relationship between MAI score and drug-related hospital admission was explored.ResultsMean summed MAI scores of 13.7 according to the geriatrician and 13.6 according to the pharmacist were obtained. The highest scores were found for drugs for the central nervous and the urinary tract system; the highest scores per question were detected for right choice, adverse drug reactions, and drug–drug interactions. A good agreement between the scores of the geriatrician and the pharmacist was found: intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 and overall κ value was 0.71. A significantly higher MAI score was found for drug-related hospital admissions (P = 0.04 for the geriatrician and P = 0.03 for the pharmacist).ConclusionsThis adapted MAI score seems useful for detection of drug-related problems in geriatric inpatients and reliable with a low inter-rater variability and positive correlation between high score and drug-related hospital admission. We consider further application of the adapted MAI for teaching and training of clinical pharmacists, and as a systematic approach for detection of drug-related problems by the clinical pharmacists in our hospital.     

Safety of Care by Caregivers of Cancer Patients

ObjectivesTo describe common areas of threats to patient safety and quality of care when caregivers provide care. Recommendations for caregivers to enable them to provide safe care are included.Data SourcesResearch-based articles and reports.ConclusionThe literature is limited in discussion on home safety issues for caregivers. Non cancer-specific literature provides some direction for recommendations for nurses to guide caregivers.Implications for Nursing PracticeThe home environment is an unregulated and uncontrolled site, and the safety risks families take are unknown. Professionals should assess the caregiver's knowledge and ability when providing caregiving guidance to ensure the patient is receiving safe and quality care. Nurses need to stress the importance of providing safe quality care and provide education and community resources.     

Comparison of tools for the assessment of inappropriate prescribing in hospitalized older people

Rational, aims and objective The aim of the present study was to compare the ease of use and the capability of four approaches [Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), the Beers' criteria 2003, the Improved Prescribing in the Elderly Tool (IPET) and Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS)] in assessing changes in medication appropriateness in elderly patients over a period of hospitalization. Methods A retrospective observational study in two hospitals in Northern Ireland using the four measures was undertaken, involving a cohort of 192 patients (aged > 65 years). Medication appropriateness assessments were made at three stages during the patients' hospital ‘journey’, that is, at admission, during their inpatient stay and at discharge. The identifying rates of inappropriate prescribing in elderly patients in hospital used validated screening tools: MAI, the Beers' criteria 2003, the IPET and HEDIS. Results The MAI was the most comprehensive approach but was also the most time consuming to apply. Data derived using the MAI indicated clearly that there was improved medication appropriateness over the three hospital stay stages (P < 0.001). Although this trend was also significant for the Beers' criteria 2003 (P < 0.05) and the IPET (P < 0.05) approaches, the HEDIS was unable to differentiate changes in appropriateness over time. There was a good correlation between data derived using the MAI and the Beers' criteria 2003 and the IPET approaches; this correlation was not evident for the HEDIS. Conclusions The MAI is the most convincing tool in evaluating medication appropriateness, but is very time consuming to apply. Beers' criteria 2003 and the IPET perform to an acceptable standard within the clinical setting and are more practical in their application. The HEDIS, although simplest to apply, does not have the sensitivity to measure change in appropriateness over time.     

Diffusion of pharmacist interventions within the framework of clinical pharmacy activity in the clinical ward

BACKGROUND: Computerised physician order entry (CPOE) and the integration of a pharmacist in clinical wards have been shown to prevent medication errors. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to describe interventions performed by a clinical pharmacist integrated into clinical wards with CPOE, to assess the acceptance of interventions by prescribers, and to describe factors associated with acceptance. METHODS: A 3-week prospective study was conducted in five wards of a 2000-bed French teaching hospital. RESULTS: During pharmacist review of medication orders and participation on physician rounds, six resident pharmacists provided interventions either conveyed orally to prescribers, using the computer system, or combining both methods. There were 221 pharmacist interventions concerning drug-drug interactions (27%), drug monitoring (17%) and computer-related problems (16%). Pharmacist interventions consisted of change of drug choice or dose adjustment (49%), drug monitoring (17%) and administration modality optimisation (14%). Interventions were provided solely via computer systems in 67% of cases. The rate of intervention acceptance was 47.1%. In multivariate analysis, acceptance was significantly associated with oral transmission (odds ratio [OR] = 6.46; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [1.65-25.24]; p < 0.01), change of drug choice or dose adjustment recommendations (OR = 3.81; 95% CI [1.63-8.86]; p < 0.01) and administration modality optimisation recommendations (OR = 9.51; 95% CI [3.02-29.93]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Communication method and nature of recommendation are factors associated with pharmacist intervention acceptance. CPOE is necessary to develop clinical pharmacy practice. However, only the integration of the pharmacist on the ward can guarantee a high level of acceptance of pharmacist interventions by prescribers.     

Pharmacist and physician collaboration in the patient's home

OBJECTIVE: To review the historical perspective and current incidence of home visits by physicians and pharmacists, discuss the concept of pharmacists providing care "incident-to" the physician, and introduce a new endeavor of collaborative, incident-to home visits by a pharmacist and physician. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1966-May 2003). The search terms used were home visit, house call, incident-to, collaborative care, physician, and pharmacist. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All pertinent articles were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Home visits were once considered a hallmark of patient care, but have decreased to an average of 0.4 home visits per week for primary care physicians. Home visits are essential for patients unable to commute to the office due to a disability or illness. However, home visits also allow the physician to determine how conditions affect a patient's everyday life, in addition to assessing the living environment. Minimal documented evidence exists of pharmacists making home visits and no documented evidence exists of pharmacists and physicians collaboratively making home visits. The pharmacist complements the value of the visit by assessing medication appropriateness as well as medication administration, storage, accessibility, and adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice styles often compromise services that were once paramount to patient care, as evidenced by a decline in home visits. Recent trends in health care attempt to compensate for high-volume practices and managed care restrictions. A collaborative relationship between a pharmacist and physician with visits into the patient's home is a movement toward improved continuity of care.     

Understanding Person and Environment Factors that Facilitate Veteran Adaptation to Long-Term Care

ABSTRACT

Aims: To use a phenomenological approach to gain an improved understanding of the person and environment factors that facilitates or impedes adaptation of veterans to long-term care. Method: Ten male veterans residing in a state-funded veteran's home between the ages of 60 to 92 years participated in this study. Data were collected through up to three in depth interviews, which were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using phenomenological principles. Results: Six over-arching themes emerged. The themes identified were: the importance of family, home, spirituality, military culture, leisure time use and food and music. The over-arching themes supported by salient participant narratives, facilitated understanding of the lived experiences of these veterans as they transitioned to long-term care. Conclusions: This study established the foundation for further research related to adaptation of veterans to long-term care.     

Collaborative home medicines review delays time to next hospitalization for warfarin associated bleeding in Australian war veterans

What is known and background: Unintended bleeds are a common complication of warfarin therapy. We aimed to determine the impact of general practitioner–pharmacist collaborative medication reviews in the practice setting on hospitalization‐associated bleeds in patients on warfarin. Method: We undertook a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data for the ambulatory veteran and war widow population, Australia. Participants were veterans, war widows and their dependents aged 65 years and over dispensed warfarin. The exposed groups were those exposed to a general practitioner (GP)–pharmacist collaborative home medication review. The service includes GP referral, a home visit by an accredited pharmacist to identify medication‐related problems, a pharmacist report with follow‐up undertaken by the GP. The outcome measure was time to next hospitalization for bleeding. Results: There were 816 veterans exposed to a home medicines review and 16 320 unexposed patients, with an average age of 81·5 years, and six to seven co‐morbidities. Adjusted results showed a 79% reduction in likelihood of hospitalization for bleeding between 2 and 6 months (HR, 0·21 95% CI, 0·05–0·87) amongst those who had received a home medicines reviewed compared to the unexposed patients. No effect was seen in the time period from review to 2 months, nor in the time period 6 to 12 months post a review. What is new and conclusion: Medicines review in the practice setting delays time to next hospitalization for bleeding in those treated with warfarin in the period 2 to 6 months after the review, but is not sustained over time. Six monthly medication reviews may be required for patients on warfarin who are considered at high risk of bleeding.     

Medication Discrepancy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Chinese-American Home-Care Patients After Hospital Discharge

BackgroundStudies of potential medication problems among older adults have focused on English-speaking populations in a single health care setting or a single potential medication problem. No previous studies investigated potential inappropriate medications (PIMs) and medication discrepancies (MDs) among older Chinese Americans during care transitions from hospital discharge to home care.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to examine, in older Chinese Americans, the prevalence of both PIMs and MDs; the relationship between PIMs and MDs; and the patient and hospitalization characteristics associated with them during care transitions from hospital discharge to home care.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of older Chinese Americans from a large certified nonprofit home-care agency in New York City from June 2010 to July 2011. PIMs were identified by using 2002 diagnosis-independent Beers criteria. MDs were identified by comparing the differences between hospital discharge medication order and home-care admission medication order. Prevalence of PIMs and MDs and their relationship was determined. Logistic regression examined the relationship between hospitalization and patient characteristics with PIMs and MDs.ResultsThe sample consisted of 82 older Chinese-American home-care patients. Twenty (24.3%) study participants were prescribed at least one PIM at hospital discharge. Fifty-one (67.1%) study participants experienced at least one MD. A positive correlation was found between the occurrence of PIMs and MDs (r = 0.22; P = 0.05). Number of medications was the only significant factor associated with both PIMs and MDs. In addition, older age and more hospitalization days were associated with PIMs.ConclusionsThe evident prevalence of PIMs and MDs supports the practice of evaluating the appropriateness of medications while reconciling inconsistencies in medication regimens. The number of medications was the only factor associated with both PIMs and MDs, underscoring the need to address polypharmacy as a multifaceted threat to patient health.     

Palatability of Crushed Over-the-Counter Medications

ContextDysphagia is a common concern, especially in the last several days of life. Medications are often crushed for ease of administration for individuals with swallowing difficulty.ObjectivesTo assess palatability of commonly used crushed over-the-counter (OTC) medications. A secondary objective is to evaluate pharmacist knowledge and opinions of crushing medications.MethodsPharmacist participants sampled crushed OTC medications and completed presampling and postsampling surveys about crushing medications. Participants were excluded for current smoking or tobacco use, pregnancy, allergy to any study medication or applesauce, or potential drug-drug interaction with study medications. Eight OTC medications were crushed and mixed in applesauce: naproxen, fexofenadine, phenazopyridine, multivitamin, loperamide, famotidine, sennosides, and sennosides-docusate. Participants were blinded to medication samples and control (plain applesauce). Samples were rated from one (least palatable) to five (most palatable). Investigators recorded participants' comments, behaviors, and facial expressions during sampling.ResultsNineteen volunteers completed the study. Most participants rated three samples as not palatable (score of two or less): fexofenadine, 16 (84%); loperamide, 13 (68%); and sennosides-docusate, 16 (84%). All participants rated famotidine and sennosides palatable. The percentage of participants who would consider palatability in recommendations for crushing medications increased from 47% prestudy to 79% poststudy.ConclusionPalatability should be considered when recommending crushed medications. Survey responses indicate that pharmacists' opinions of crushed medications changed after this palatability experiment. Clinicians should evaluate the appropriateness of all medications when dysphagia is a concern and deprescribe medications when appropriate to reduce burden for patients and caregivers.     

Adherence to use of blood cultures according to current national guidelines and their impact in patients with community acquired pneumonia: A retrospective cohort

BackgroundCommunity acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most frequent cause of mortality secondary to infectious etiologies. Recommendations about the use of blood cultures in the diagnosis and treatment of CAP has been a contentious topic of debate and ever-changing recommendations.MethodsA cohort study was conducted in a community teaching hospital. All the patients that were admitted with a diagnosis of CAP, between January and December of 2019 were included. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. Blood cultures results were obtained, and it was evaluated if they were done in compliance with current recommendations by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA).Results721 patients were included in the study. Median age was 68 years and 50% of the patients were male (n = 293). Patients presented from home (84%) and the most common comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes (68% and 31%). 96 patients had positive blood culture and 34% (n = 247) of all the blood cultures were adequately ordered. 80 patients died or went to hospice and the median length of hospital stay in our cohort was 7 days. The multivariate model showed that mortality was associated with positive blood cultures (OR = 3.1 95%CI 1.63–5.87) and appropriateness of blood cultures (OR = 2.96 95% CI 1.2–5.7).ConclusionAdequate use of blood cultures in patients with CAP might have some association with the outcomes of this disease. However, a prospective study evaluating the utility of this test following current IDSA recommendations is needed to understand their impact in mortality and morbidity.     

The impact of residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) on medication regimen complexity

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of RMMRs on medication regimen complexity, as assessed by a validated measure.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of RMMRs pertaining to 285 aged care residents aged ≥ 65 years in Sydney, Australia. Medication regimen complexity was measured using the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) at baseline, after pharmacists’ recommendations (assuming that all of the pharmacists’ recommendations were accepted by the General Practitioner (GP)), and after the actual uptake of pharmacists’ recommendations by the GP. Differences in the regimen complexity was measured using the Wilcoxon sign rank test.

Results: Pharmacists made 764 recommendations (average 2.7 recommendations per RMMR), of which 569 (74.5%) were accepted by GPs. The median MRCI at baseline in the sample was 25.5 (IQR = 19.0–32.5). No statistically significant differences were demonstrated in the MRCI scores after pharmacists’ recommendations (p = 0.53) or after GPs’ acceptance of these recommendations (p = 0.07) compared to the baseline.

Conclusion: Our study revealed high acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations by GPs. This suggests that RMMRs are useful for identifying and resolving drug-related issues among residents of ACFs. However, our study failed to show a significant effect of RMMRs in reducing the medication regimen complexity, as measured by the MRCI. Further studies are needed to establish the association of medication regimen complexity and clinical outcomes in residents of ACFs.     

The contribution of patient interviews to the identification of drug‐related problems in home medication review

What is known and Objective: To determine to what extent patient interviews contribute to the identification of drug‐related problems (DRPs) in home medication reviews, in terms of number, type and clinical relevance. Methods: We performed a cross‐sectional study within the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial. Patients were recruited from 10 Dutch community pharmacies. Patients were eligible if they were home‐dwelling, aged 65 years and over and used five or more different drugs, including at least one cardiovascular or antidiabetic drug. The community pharmacist interviewed the patient at home about the medicines and identified potential DRPs in combination with medication and clinical records. This medication review was assessed and modified by an independent pharmacist reviewers’ panel. Outcomes were the number and type of DRPs and recommendations and percentage of clinical relevant DRPs. Clinical relevance of DRPs was assessed by DRPs assigned a high priority, DRPs followed by recommendations for drug change and DRPs followed by implemented recommendations for drug change. Results: A total of 1565 potential DRPs and recommendations (10 per patient).were identified for 155 patients (median age, 76 years; 54% women). Fifty‐eight per cent of all recommendations involved a drug change; 27% of all DRPs were identified during patient interviews and 74% from medication and clinical records. Compared to DRPs identified from patient medication and clinical records, DRPs identified during patient interviews were more frequently assigned a high priority (OR = 1·8 [1·4–2·2]), were more frequently associated with recommendations for drug change (OR = 2·4 [1·9–3·1]) and were implemented recommendations for drug change (OR = 2·8 [2·1–3·7]). What is new and Conclusion: This study shows that more than a quarter of all DRPs were identified during patient interviews. DRPs identified during patient interviews were more frequently assigned a higher clinical relevance.