Effect of deprivation and gender on the incidence and management of acute brain disorders

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of deprivation and gender on the incidence and emergency management of acute brain disorders. DESIGN: Retrospective database review of mortality, hospital discharge, and ICU discharge data. SETTING: Lothian Health Board area, 1995-1999. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: All persons over the age of 15 dying or being discharged from hospital with a primary diagnosis of stroke, epilepsy, subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) or traumatic brain injury; patients registered in the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Database as having been discharged from the supraregional neurosciences intensive care unit with one of these as a primary diagnoses and a home postcode within the Lothian Health Board area. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Standardised ratios were calculated for hospital admission, mortality, and ICU admission by deprivation category and gender. Data were available for 29,205 hospital admissions, 5,227 deaths, and 360 ICU admissions. For all diagnoses, deprivation was associated with higher rates of hospital admission and death. Deprivation was associated with lower rates of ICU admission for traumatic brain injury and stroke. There was a U-shaped relationship between deprivation and ICU admission with epilepsy. There were no gender differences in rates of ICU admission. Males had higher rates of hospital admission for all conditions and of death from epilepsy and SAH, and lower rates of death from stroke. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated deprivation- and gender- differences in the incidence and emergency management of four acute brain disorders. The identification of the source(s) of these differences is an important subject for further research.     

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Asymptomatic Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Asian Neurorehabilitation Admissions in Singapore

Chua K, Kong KH, Chan SP. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis in Asian neurorehabilitation admissions in Singapore.

Objective

To determine the local prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic lower limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT) among neurorehabilitation admissions.

Design

A prospective observational single-center study.

Setting

Tertiary rehabilitation center affiliated to a public hospital.

Participants

A total of 419 Asian neurorehabilitation admissions with a mean of 26 days to rehabilitation.

Intervention

Admission screening protocol included quantitative D-dimer assay within 24 to 48 hours of rehabilitation admission and targeted hemiplegic/weaker lower-extremity venous duplex ultrasonography was performed if D-dimer assay level was elevated at 0.34 μg/mL or higher.

Main Outcome Measures

There were 251 (59.9%) men, and the subjects were predominantly Chinese (76.6%). Subjects had a mean age of 59±15 years. Admitting diagnoses included ischemic stroke (212), hemorrhagic stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage (129), traumatic brain injury (59), and nontraumatic brain injury (19). The screening protocol included a quantitative D-dimer assay within 24 to 48 hours of rehabilitation admission, and hemiplegic/weaker lower-extremity venous duplex ultrasonography was performed if D-dimer assay level was elevated at 0.34 μg/mL or higher.

Results

Altogether, 247 (58.9%) patients had an elevated D-dimer assay, and all underwent venous duplex ultrasonography. The incidence of lower-limb DVT was 5.01% (21), including 11 proximal and 10 distal DVT. No patients had clinical pulmonary embolism. Using 247 venous duplex ultrasonography results for analyses of correlates with logistic regression analyses, no significant demographic or clinical predictive factors for DVT were found.

Conclusions

This study confirms that asymptomatic lower limb DVT is indeed uncommon in Asian neurorehabilitation admissions. Possible reasons include genetic or ethnic protective factors, early walking initiated at rehabilitation, and timing of the admission protocol (median of 14 days postevent) when the maximal thrombotic risk was on the decline.     

Functional outcomes at 12 months for patients with traumatic brain injury,intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage treated in an Australian neurocritical care unit: A prospective cohort study

BackgroundAcute severe brain injury is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Patients and their families need accurate information regarding expected outcomes. Few studies have reported the long-term functional outcome of patients with acute severe brain injury treated in an Australian neurocritical care unit.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to describe 12-month functional outcomes (using the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) of patients with acute severe brain injury treated in an Australian neurocritical care unit.MethodsThis was a single-centre prospective cohort study. Patients with a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage or intracranial haemorrhage admitted between 2015 and 2019 were enrolled.ResultsIn total, 915 participants were enrolled during the 51-month study period. Of the cohort, 403 (44%) were admitted after traumatic brain injury, 274 (30%) after subarachnoid haemorrhage and 238 (26%) after intracranial haemorrhage. The median duration of intensive care admission was 5 days (interquartile range: 2–13), 458 (50%) received invasive ventilation, 417 (46%) received vasopressor support and 286 (31%) received an external ventricular drain. At discharge from intensive care, 150 of 915 (16.4%) had died, and the in-hospital mortality was seen in 191 of 915 patients (20.9%). Favourable functional outcome, as defined by an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5–8, was reported in 358 of available 795 patients (45.0%) at six months and in 311 of 672 available patients (46.3%) at 12 months. Those with intracranial haemorrhage reported the highest rates of unfavourable outcomes with 112 of 166 patients (67.4%) at 12 months.ConclusionsIn this selected population, admission to a neurocritical care unit was associated with significant resource use. At 12 months after admission, almost half of those admitted to an Australian neurocritical unit with traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracerebral haemorrhage report a good functional outcome.     

Influence of social deprivation on intensive care outcome

Objective: To assess the influence of social deprivation on outcome from admission to the intensive care unit. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral centre mixed adult intensive care unit (ICU). Patients: Seven hundred seventy-four consecutive admissions to the ICU over a 2-year period. Interventions: None.¶Measurements and results: Age, admission illness severity measured by APACHE II score, predicted hospital mortality, actual hospital mortality and length of ICU stay were obtained for all patients. Social deprivation was assessed by Carstairs Score for postcode sector of residence categorised from 1 (most affluent ) to 7 (most deprived). Carstairs Scores were obtained for 716 patients. When patients in categories 6 and 7 were compared with the others there were no significant differences in age, admission illness severity, predicted or actual hospital mortality and length of ICU stay. On multivariate analysis there was no evidence of an increased mortality risk for patients in categories 6 and 7 (p = 0.256, odds ratio 1.2, 95 % confidence interval 0.9–1.7). Conclusions: Social deprivation does not influence outcome in patients admitted to the ICU.     

Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology, and functional outcome.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and compare the incidence, demographics, neurologic presentation, and functional outcome of individuals with nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) to individuals with traumatic SCI. DESIGN: A 5-year prospective study. SETTING: Level I trauma center of a Regional SCI Model System. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty adult SCI admissions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, etiology, level and completeness of injury, Functional Independent Measure (FIM) scores. RESULTS: Of SCI admissions, 39% were nontraumatic in etiology (spinal stenosis, 54%; tumor, 26%). Compared to subjects with traumatic SCI, those individuals with nontraumatic SCI were significantly (p < .01) older and were more likely married, female, and retired. Injury characteristics revealed significantly more paraplegia and incomplete SCI within the nontraumatic SCI group (p < .01). Both nontraumatic and traumatic SCI individuals had significant FIM changes from rehabilitation admission to discharge (p < .01). Those with tetraplegia-incomplete nontraumatic SCI had significantly higher admission motor FIM scores and shorter rehabilitation length of stay than in the traumatic group (p < .05). Paraplegic-complete and paraplegic-incomplete nontraumatic SCI subjects had lower discharge motor FIM scores, FIM change, and FIM efficiency than those with traumatic SCI. Similar discharge-to-home rates were noted in both nontraumatic and traumatic SCI groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that individuals with nontraumatic SCI represent a significant proportion of SCI rehabilitation admissions and, although differing from those with traumatic SCI in demographic and injury patterns, can achieve similar functional outcomes.     

Biomarkers and acute brain injuries: interest and limits

For patients presenting with acute brain injury (such as traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage and stroke), the diagnosis and identification of intracerebral lesions and evaluation of the severity, prognosis and treatment efficacy can be challenging. The complexity and heterogeneity of lesions after brain injury are most probably responsible for this difficulty. Patients with apparently comparable brain lesions on imaging may have different neurological outcomes or responses to therapy. In recent years, plasmatic and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers have emerged as possible tools to distinguish between the different pathophysiological processes. This review aims to summarise the plasmatic and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers evaluated in subarachnoid haemorrhage, traumatic brain injury and stroke, and to clarify their related interests and limits for diagnosis and prognosis. For subarachnoid haemorrhage, particular interest has been focused on the biomarkers used to predict vasospasm and cerebral ischaemia. The efficacy of biomarkers in predicting the severity and outcome of traumatic brain injury has been stressed. The very early diagnostic performance of biomarkers and their ability to discriminate ischaemic from haemorrhagic stroke were studied.     

The prevalence and characteristics of shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of shoulder pain in people with traumatic brain injury participating in inpatient rehabilitation and to compare the clinical presentation with that of people with stroke. DESIGN: A prospective comparative study. SETTING: Six metropolitan rehabilitation units. SUBJECTS: Eighty-seven people with traumatic brain injury and 52 people with stroke took part in the study. MAIN MEASURES: Assessment of shoulder pain, range of motion, strength and function was conducted on admission and, for the subjects with traumatic brain injury, at discharge if rehabilitation exceeded two weeks. RESULTS: The prevalence of shoulder pain in people with traumatic brain injury was 62%, which was comparable with the 69% of subjects with stroke that experienced shoulder pain (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.34 -1.5). Fracture in the shoulder complex and passive shoulder external rotation range of motion were the best predictors for shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury. This was different from the subjects with stroke for which the best predictors were passive shoulder flexion range of motion and length of acute hospital stay. CONCLUSION: There is a relatively high prevalence of shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury. Trauma to the shoulder complex contributes to shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury, making clinical presentation different from people with stroke. The findings support the need for greater attention in the management of shoulder pain after traumatic brain injury.     

Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To compare the appropriateness and responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: A regional neurological rehabilitation unit. PATIENTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine consecutive patients undergoing inpatient comprehensive neurological rehabilitation following a vascular brain injury due to single cerebral infarction (n = 75), spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (n = 34) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (n = 43), and 107 patients who had sustained traumatic brain injury. MEASUREMENTS: Admission and discharge FIM total, physical and cognitive scores and the Barthel Index were recorded. Appropriateness and responsiveness in the study samples were determined by examining score distributions and floor and ceiling effects, and by an effect size calculation respectively. Non-parametric statistical analysis was used to calculate the significance of the change in scores. RESULTS: In all patient groups there was a significant improvement (Wilcoxon's rank sum, P<0.0001) in the Barthel Index (mean change score: vascular 3.9, traumatic 3.95) and FIM (mean change score: vascular 17.3, traumatic 17.4) scores during rehabilitation, and similar effect sizes were found for the Barthel Index (effect size: vascular 0.65, traumatic 0.55) and FIM total (effect size: vascular 0.59, traumatic 0.48) and physical scores in all patient groups. In each patient group the cognitive component of the FIM had the smallest effect size (0.35-0.43). CONCLUSIONS: All measures were appropriate for younger (less than 65 years of age) patients undergoing early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident vascular or traumatic brain injury. The Barthel Index and the total and physical FIM scores showed similar responsiveness, whilst the cognitive FIM score was least responsive. These findings suggest that none of the FIM scores have any advantage over the Barthel Index in evaluating change in these circumstances.     

Day-of-injury computerized tomography, rehabilitation status, and development of cerebral atrophy in persons with traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To compare day-of-injury (DOI) computerized tomography (CT) findings with acute injury severity markers, disability at acute hospital admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, injury severity markers, and degree of postacute cerebral atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 240 consecutive traumatic brain injury (TBI) admissions (mean age 31.7 +/- 15.8 yrs) with moderate-to-severe initial brain injury. All DOI CT abnormalities were qualitatively rated. Disability was assessed using the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and the FIM measure. In a representative subset, cerebral atrophy was determined by the ventricle-to-brain ratio (VBR) method and quantified from MRI scans 25 or more days postinjury. RESULTS: CT classification resulted in nonsignificant differences in DRS and FIM ratings at the time of discharge from the rehabilitation unit, except in brainstem injury subjects who had significantly higher DRS and lower FIM scores at rehabilitation discharge. At 25 or more days postinjury, presence of any DOI CT abnormality was associated with larger VBR. Increased VBR, as an index of cerebral atrophy, was associated with worse rehabilitation discharge DRS and FIM ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Other than brainstem injury, DOI CT findings relate poorly to rehabilitation outcome. Presence of DOI CT abnormalities were associated with the development of cerebral atrophy, which was associated with poorer rehabilitation discharge DRS and FIM scores.     

Effect of co-morbid traumatic brain injury on functional outcome of persons with spinal cord injuries

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine if persons who sustain a spinal cord injury (SCI) and co-morbid brain injury (dual diagnosis [DDS]) evidence smaller functional gains and experience significantly longer rehabilitation lengths of stay than persons with only an SCI. DESIGN: This retrospective comparison study was performed at a 100-bed rehabilitation hospital specializing in acute SCI and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Summary scale outcome data of persons who sustained an SCI were compared with outcome data of a group of persons with a DDS. Comparisons were established by matching groups principally on level of SCI and admission Motor FIM trade mark score and secondarily on education, sex, and age. Outcome measures included admission Motor and Cognitive FIM score, discharge Motor and Cognitive FIM score, Motor and Cognitive FIM change, length of stay, and rehabilitation charges. RESULTS: Persons with a DDS evidenced a significantly more impaired Cognitive FIM score at admission and discharge from rehabilitation. Persons with a DDS also achieved a significantly lower Motor FIM change than persons with SCI. There were no significant differences between DDS and SCI groups regarding Cognitive FIM change, length of stay, or rehabilitation charges. Injury severity as defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale or intracranial lesions did not predict response to treatment in the DDS group. CONCLUSION: Persons with a DDS achieved smaller functional gains during rehabilitation than peers with SCI. Brain injuries seem to limit functional gains, although the relationship between brain injury severity and functional change is not linear. Prospective studies are needed to identify factors limiting functional gains in rehabilitation and assist in developing specific treatment programs for persons with SCI and brain injury.     

Cortical spreading depression: an adverse but treatable factor in intensive care?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aetiology and management of secondary deterioration in patients with acute traumatic or ischaemic brain injury remain serious challenges for clinicians and also for basic neuroscientists. The occurrence of spreading depolarization events and some of their features in the cerebral cortex in patients with traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, as documented in recent papers, represent a novel pathophysiological mechanism in this setting. RECENT FINDINGS: The history and definitions of two critically different patterns of depolarization are reviewed on the basis of their physiology and pathophysiology, particularly the responses of the cerebral microcirculation to depolarization as seen in the laboratory. It is now becoming possible to conduct similar assessments in the brain-injured patient. Currently the recorded incidence of depolarization events in patients undergoing craniotomy for traumatic contusions is in the region of 50-60%, rising to 72% following major subarachnoid haemorrhage. SUMMARY: Realization of the therapeutic potential of the new findings will depend on clear knowledge of the impact of the different patterns of depolarization on outcome. Meantime, current results call for even stricter attention during clinical management of acute brain injury to secondary factors such as body temperature and plasma glucose.     

Insomnia screening in postacute traumatic brain injury: utility and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

OBJECTIVE: To assess insomnia in a rehabilitation population, the authors examined the utility and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The assessment of insomnia is relevant to the treatment of traumatic brain injury at the postacute level and routine screening for insomnia may be enhanced by the availability of a standardized, conveniently used, self-report sleep questionnaire. DESIGN: The authors prospectively studied 91 consecutive patients with traumatic brain injury who were admitted to an outpatient neurorehabilitation program. Besides administering the PSQI, Beck Depression Inventory, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Multidimensional Pain Inventory, sleep diary and interview data were obtained and used to divide subjects into insomnia and noninsomnia groups according to the criteria established by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity rates to the clinical diagnosis of insomnia were 93% and 100%, respectively, for a PSQI Global Score of >8, and 83% and 100% for a diagnosis of insomnia based exclusively on PSQI-derived sleep variable data. Sleep diary data provided concurrent validity for PSQI estimates of sleep-onset latency, sleep duration, and sleep efficiency. The Beck Depression Inventory, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Multidimensional Pain Inventory established concurrent validity for individual PSQI items pertaining to mood, hypersomnia, and pain disturbance. CONCLUSION: The PSQI was demonstrated to be a valid and useful screening tool for assessing insomnia among postacute patients with traumatic brain injury.     

Functional outcomes in patients with brain tumor after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison with traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcome, length of stay, and discharge disposition of individuals with brain tumor versus those with acute traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: In this study, 78 brain tumor patients were one-to-one matched by location of lesion and age with 78 acute traumatic brain injury patients. Outcome was measured by using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM 228) on admission and discharge. The FIM change and FIM efficiency were also calculated. FIM data were analyzed in three subsets, i.e., activities of daily living, mobility, and cognition. Discharge disposition and rehabilitation length of stay were also compared. RESULTS: Demographic variables of race, marital status, and payer source were comparable for the two groups. No significant difference was found between the brain tumor and the traumatic brain injury populations with respect to total admission FIM, total discharge FIM, and FIM efficiency. The brain injury population had a significantly greater change in FIM. The tumor group had a significantly shorter rehabilitation length of stay and a greater discharge to community rate. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, individuals with brain tumor can achieve comparable functional outcome and have a shorter rehabilitation length of stay and greater discharge to community rate than individuals with brain injury.     

Post-acute care referral and inpatient rehabilitation admission criteria for persons with brain injury across two Canadian provinces

Purpose: Investigate health care providers’ perceptions of referral and admission criteria to brain injury inpatient rehabilitation in two Canadian provinces.

Methods: Health care providers (n?=?345) from brain injury programs (13 acute care and 16 rehabilitation facilities) participated in a cross-sectional web-based survey. The participants rated the likelihood of patients (traumatic brain injury and cerebral hypoxia) to be referred/admitted to rehabilitation and the influence of 19 additional factors (e.g., tracheostomy). The participants reported the perceived usefulness of referral/admission policies and assessment tools used.

Results: Ninety-one percent acute care and 98% rehabilitation participants reported the person with traumatic brain injury would likely or very likely be referred/admitted to rehabilitation compared to respectively 43% and 53% for the patient with hypoxia. Two additional factors significantly decreased the likelihood of referral/admission: older age and the combined presence of minimal learning ability, memory impairment and physical aggression. Some significant inter-provincial variations in the perceived referral/admission procedure were observed. Most participants reported policies were helpful. Similar assessment tools were used in acute care and rehabilitation.

Conclusions: Health care providers appear to consider various factors when making decisions regarding referral and admission to rehabilitation. Variations in the perceived likelihood of referral/admission suggest a need for standardized referral/admission practices.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Various patient characteristics influence clinicians’ decisions when selecting appropriate candidates for inpatient rehabilitation.

• In this study, acute care clinicians were less likely to refer patients that their rehabilitation counter parts would likely have admitted and a patient with hypoxic brain injury was less likely to be referred or admitted in rehabilitation than a patient with a traumatic brain injury.

• Such discrepancies suggest that policy-makers, managers and clinicians should work together to develop and implement more standardized referral practices and more specific admission criteria in order to ensure equitable access to brain injury rehabilitation services.

     

Process and outcome during early inpatient rehabilitation after brain injury

Purpose: To describe aspects of process and outcome during early inpatient rehabilitation of younger adults after single incident brain injury.

Method: Analysis of a database of 290 patients discharged from an inner-city hospital based inpatient unit for younger adults after single incident neurological events, over a 5-year period.

Results: Analysis showed a stable case-mix of patients over the 5 years surveyed with a preponderance of young male patients after traumatic brain injury. Improvements in patients' disability and dependency, measured by the Barthel Index and Functional Independence Measure, were recorded in the majority of patients. The ethnic diversity of the patients, reflecting the multi-cultural nature of the catchment population, did not appear to affect rehabilitation outcome. Failure to record improvement in 15% of patients was related to the floor and ceiling effects of the instruments. A useful regression equation was produced relating length of stay to Barthel score on admission.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate the changes that occur during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury. They explore clinical indicators of dependency and outcome, and aspects of resource utilization that characterize our service. Publication of data of this sort, from this and other units, should encourage the development and improvement of current rehabilitation service delivery after brain injury.     

Relationship between strength, balance, and swallowing deficits and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation among strength, balance, and swallowing deficits, as measured on rehabilitation admission, and functional outcome at discharge and 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Multicenter analysis of consecutive admissions to designated Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) facilities. SETTING: Seventeen TBIMS centers. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children older than 16 years of age with TBI (N=2363) enrolled in the national database from January 1989 to November 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Transfers, locomotion, stairs, lower-body dressing, grooming, bathing, upper-body dressing, toileting, and eating as measured by the FIM instrument at acute rehabilitation discharge and at 1 year after TBI. RESULTS: Lower-extremity strength less than 3/5 on admission to acute rehabilitation was associated with increased need for assistance in locomotion, transfers, and lower-body dressing and less than 3/5 upper-extremity strength was associated with the need for assistance in self-care at rehabilitation discharge and at 1 year postinjury. Similar relations were found between impaired swallowing and assistance with eating, grossly impaired dynamic sitting, or standing balance and assistance with locomotion, transfers, eating, and self-care at rehabilitation discharge and at 1 year after TBI. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments of physical strength, swallowing ability, and dynamic balance on acute rehabilitation admission are helpful as screening tests in predicting the need for assistance of another person for mobility and self-care at rehabilitation discharge. This association remains strong at 1 year after TBI. By using this information, clinicians should initiate therapeutic interventions that optimize rehabilitation of the identified impairments and should make necessary arrangement for the patient's anticipated postdischarge needs. Further studies are necessary to delineate the amount of unique variance that these early physical examination findings contribute to outcome prediction.     

Functional outcomes from inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: how do Hispanics fare?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between Hispanic ethnicity and rehabilitation outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Longitudinal dataset of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems national database. PARTICIPANTS: Persons (N=3056; 2745 whites vs 311 Hispanics) with moderate to severe TBI hospitalized between 1989 and 2003. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcomes at discharge and 1-year follow-up (Disability Rating Scale [DRS], FIM instrument). Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), and the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were measured at follow-up only. RESULTS: At admission, Hispanics were less educated (P相似文献