Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of the standing flexion test.

The practice of musculoskeletal medicine requires the use of a wide variety of clinical examination procedures to establish a diagnosis, plan treatment, and monitor patient progress. Many of these examination procedures constitute a significant part of daily practice. Despite their extensive use, the reliability and validity of many of these assessment procedures remains questionable. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpatory findings for the standing flexion test; one test for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction. Nine examiners performed the standing flexion test on nine asymptomatic subjects. Inter-examiner reliability data, with a mean percentage agreement of 42% and a kappa coefficient of 0.052, demonstrated statistically insignificant reliability. Intra-examiner reliability data demonstrated a mean percentage agreement of 68% and a kappa coefficient of 0.46 indicating moderate reliability. These results suggest that the reliability of the standing flexion test as an indicator of SIJ dysfunction still remains questionable. Before this test can be relied upon as an accurate indicator of SIJ dysfunction it must undergo further research. This research must not only further standardize the procedure, but also ascertain reliability and validity.     

Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint

In the literature many tests are described which are designed to provoke pain or detect joint mobility in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). However, in part 1 of this review, the authors stated that there is little evidence of reliability of these tests. In this article, the authors describe the methodological review of 11 studies, which have dealt with the validity of SIJ tests. The methodological quality of the studies was tested by using a list of criteria that consisted of three categories: 1) study population, 2) test procedure and 3) test results. A weighting for each criterion was developed. The methodological score for the studies was, in general, disappointing and looked promising for only two out of 11 studies (58 and 64 points). Four authors drew conclusions of positive validity from the tests they studied but other authors did not confirm these results. The conclusion of this methodological review is that there is no evidence to support the inclusion of mobility and pain provocation tests for the SIJ in clinical practice. Three major problems have been identified in validating SIJ dysfunction tests. Firstly, poor reliability of SIJ dysfunction tests exists, which may be improved by multiple test scores as postulated in part 1 of this review. Secondly, the methodological quality of validity studies needs to be developed to a much higher level with special consideration paid to sensitivity, specificity, confidence intervals and likelihood ratio values. And finally, there is a need for the proper use of a gold standard in assessing the validity of SIJ tests.     

The role of experience in clinical accuracy

A randomized controlled trial was performed to study the effect of various teaching techniques on students performing sacroiliac motion palpation tests. This trial assessed the interexaminer reliability of interns in their final year at a chiropractic college, and compared their results prior to and following 1 year of clinical experience. The study also compared the intra- and interexaminer reliability of experienced clinicians. The results were analyzed via the Kappa coefficient. Kappa values for interns ranged from 0.00 to 0.30, with no significant differences noted at the end of 1 year of clinical experience. The interexaminer reliability of experienced clinicians was 0.00 to 0.167, whereas their intraexaminer reliability ranged from 0.15 to 1.00. These results question the role of experience in improving clinical accuracy between examiners performing sacroiliac motion palpation. Results analyzed for intraexaminer agreement were moderate to almost perfect. We conclude that experience does not play a significant role in the diagnostic test analyzed, but rather that clinicians may establish their own criteria by which to determine the standards of a given test.     

Intratester and intertester reliability of neck isometric dynamometry

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility of measurement for maximum voluntary isometric contractions of the cervical musculature in different movements. DESIGN: Repeated test-retest measurements. SETTING: A department of physiotherapy. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three healthy subjects (17 men, 16 women; age range, 19-63 y) for the intraexaminer study and 10 healthy subjects (4 men, 6 women; age range, 20-37 y) for the interexaminer study. INTERVENTIONS: Maximum isometric strength in sitting and standing for flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation using a custom isomyometer device. Three tests, performed 5 to 8 days apart, to assess intraexaminer reliability. Two examiners, each performing 1 trial, measuring on the same day to assess interexaminer reliability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of neck muscle strength. RESULTS: The standing position showed better reproducibility than the sitting position. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1,3) was above .84 for all tests in any movement and position and above .93 when the first test was excluded. The standard error (SE) of measurement (<16.5 N; <.13 N-m for rotation) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) (<20.1%) were also small. For interexaminer reliability, the ICC(2,1) ranged from.88 to.94 and the SE from 10.7 to 20.8 N (<1.15 N-m for rotation); the SDD was less than 29.8% (except right rotation, which was 38.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A reliable protocol for measuring neck strength has been developed. Standing position and a full practice session produces more reliable measurements.     

Measurement of trunk flexibility in normal subjects: reproducibility of three clinical methods

Although measurements of trunk flexibility are an important part of a clinical examination, subjective methods are usually used to assess spinal mobility. We studied three easily performed objective techniques for determining trunk flexibility (the common "fingertip-to-floor" test, the modified Schober and Moll tests, and the Loebl inclinometer method) and their interexaminer and intraexaminer reproducibility. On 3 different days, each of 25 normal subjects was tested by the same investigator. In 25 other subjects, the studies were performed by a different examiner (one of three) on each of 3 days. We recorded the following mean coefficients of variation for interexaminer and intraexaminer reproducibility of results, respectively: fingertip-to-floor, 83% and 76.4%; flexion (Schober), 6.3% and 6.6%; right lateral flexion (Moll), 11.9% and 8.9%; left lateral flexion (Moll), 10.2% and 9.5%; extension (Moll), 9.5% and 7.3%; lumbar flexion (Loebl), 9.6% and 13.4%; and lumbar extension (Loebl), 65.4% and 50.7%. Although the reproducibility of the "fingertip-to-floor" test and the Loebl extension test was poor, all other tests studied had good reproducibility. The consistency of results with repeated testing should be considered in the application of various trunk flexibility tests to clinical and research data.     

Diagnostic Validity of Criteria for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Systematic Review

A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the diagnostic validity of the criteria for sacroiliac (SI) joint pain as proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). Databases were searched up to September 2007. Quality of the studies was assessed using a Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated together with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical pooling was conducted for results of provocative tests. Eighteen studies were included. Five studies examined the pattern of SI joint pain, whereas another 5 examined stressing test specific for SI joint pain. None of the studies evaluated the diagnostic validity of the SI joint infiltration or the diagnostic validity of the IASP criteria set as a whole. In all studies, the SI joint selective infiltration was used as a gold standard; however, the technique, medications, and required pain relief after the infiltration varied considerably between the studies. Taking the double infiltration technique as reference test, the pooled data of the thigh thrust test (DOR, 18.461; CI, 5.82 to 58.53), compression test (DOR, 3.88; CI, 1.7 to 8.9), and 3 or more positive stressing tests (DOR, 17.16; CI, 7.6 to 39) showed discriminative power for diagnosing SI joint pain.PerspectiveThis review of clinical studies focused on the diagnostic validity of the IASP criteria for diagnosing SI joint pain. A meta-analysis showed that the thigh thrust test, the compression test, and 3 or more positive stressing tests have discriminative power for diagnosing SI joint pain. Because a gold standard for SI joint pain diagnosis is lacking, the diagnostic validity of tests related to the IASP criteria for SI joint pain should be regarded with care.     

Reliability of Cervicocephalic Proprioception Assessment: A Systematic Review

ObjectiveThe purpose of this systematic review was to determine the reliability and, where possible, the validity of cervicocephalic proprioceptive (CCP) tests in healthy adults and clinical populations.MethodsA systematic search, utilizing 7 databases from the earliest possible date to April 14, 2021, identified studies that measured reliability of CCP tests. Studies were screened for eligibility, and included studies were appraised using Quality Appraisal Tool for Studies of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 Tool (QUADAS-2) tools. Validity outcomes were assessed for included studies.ResultsOf 34 included studies, 29 investigated reliability for sense of position tests, 10 involved sense of movement tests, and 1 used a sense of force test. The head to neutral test was reliable and valid when 6 or more repetitions were performed within the test, discriminating between those with and without neck pain. Head tracking tests were reliable with 6 repetitions, and 1 study found discriminative validity in a whiplash population. Studies that found discriminative validity in sense of position reported mean joint position error generally >4.5° in the neck pain group and <4.5° in the asymptomatic group. No sense of force test was applied to a clinical population. Convergent validity analysis showed that these proprioceptive tests have low correlations with each other.ConclusionThe reliability and validity of CCP tests for sense of position and movement are dependent upon equipment and repetitions. Six repetitions are generally required for good reliability, and joint position error >4.5° is likely to indicate impairment in sense of position.     

The Influence of Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation on Changes in the Values of the Center of Pressure in the Process of Maintaining Static Body Balance

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to determine the influence of manipulative treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) hypomobility on the ability to maintain static balance of the body.MethodsWe compared displacements of the center of pressure (COP) in 2 groups of students of the University of Physical Education: the experimental group (30 people exhibiting SIJ hypomobility) and the control group (29 people without SIJ hypomobility). A manipulation was performed in the experimental group and a placebo procedure in the control group. Sacroiliac joint hypomobility was diagnosed by the following SIJ mobility tests: forward flexion test, Gillet test, long sitting test, lower limb adduction test. These and podometric tests were performed on all participants twice—before and after the procedure. The influence of experimental manipulation was examined by applying repeated-measures analysis of variance, and comparisons were made with Student's t test for dependent and independent samples and nonparametric tests.ResultsA statistically significant difference between before and after treatment was found in the experimental group (P < .05) in terms of COP pathway, COP pathway area, and average COP speed. Furthermore, the groups differed in before-treatment values of these parameters in favor of the control group, but after-treatment measurement revealed normalization of the levels of these characteristics in the experimental group to the level of the control group.ConclusionAs a result of SIJ manipulation, parameters related to the ability to maintain balance improved in the experimental group.     

Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the peer-reviewed literature about the reliability and validity of chiropractic tests used to determine the need for spinal manipulative therapy of the lumbo-pelvic spine, taking into account the quality of the studies. DATA SOURCES: The CHIROLARS database was searched for the years 1976 to 1995 with the following index terms: "chiropractic tests," "chiropractic adjusting technique," "motion palpation," "movement palpation," "leg length," "applied kinesiology," and "sacrooccipital technique." In addition, a manual search was performed at the libraries of the Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark, and the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic, Bournemouth, United Kingdom. STUDY SELECTION: Studies pertaining to intraexaminer reliability, interexaminer reliability, and/or validity of chiropractic evaluation of the lumbo-pelvic spine were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data quality were assessed independently by the two reviewers, with a quality score based on predefined methodologic criteria. Results of the studies were then evaluated in relation to quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: None of the tests studied had been sufficiently evaluated in relation to reliability and validity. Only tests for palpation for pain had consistently acceptable results. Motion palpation of the lumbar spine might be valid but showed poor reliability, whereas motion palpation of the sacroiliac joints seemed to be slightly reliable but was not shown to be valid. Measures of leg-length inequality seemed to correlate with radiographic measurements but consensus on method and interpretation is lacking. For the sacrooccipital technique, some evidence favors the validity of the arm-fossa test but the rest of the test regimen remains poorly documented. Documentation of applied kinesiology was not available. Palpation for muscle tension, palpation for misalignment, and visual inspection were either undocumented, unreliable, or not valid. CONCLUSION: The detection of the manipulative lesion in the lumbo-pelvic spine depends on valid and reliable tests. Because such tests have not been established, the presence of the manipulative lesion remains hypothetical. Great effort is needed to develop, establish, and enforce valid and reliable test procedures.     

Relationship of the mobility of the sacroiliac joint with foot plant pressure

[Purpose] To evaluate mobility of the sacroiliac joint and plantar pressure changes. [Participants and Methods] This was an analytical study comprised of 300 participants, using a functional kinetic evaluation involving the test of standing flexion (SFT), the test of Downing, the test of Gillet, and the analysis of baropodometry. [Results] There was an association between mobility of the sacroiliac joint and the standing center of gravity. However, the mobility of this joint was not associated with plantar pressure and the plantar contact area. [Conclusion] These data suggest that sacroiliac mobility is linked to the center of gravity. This connection may precede sacroiliac dysfunction and may help to improve the accuracy of the tests.Key words: Sacroiliac mobility, Sacroiliac joint, Plantar pressure     

Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability

In the literature concerning the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) there are numerous specific tests used to detect joint mobility or pain provocation. In this article the authors have reviewed 11 studies which investigated the reliability of these tests. The methodological quality of the studies was tested by a list of criteria developed by the authors. This list consisted of three categories: (1) study population, (2) test procedures and (3) test results. To each criterion a weighting was attached. The methodological score for nine out of the 11 studies was found to be acceptable. The results of this review, however, could not demonstrate reliable outcomes and therefore no evidence on which to base acceptance of mobility tests of the SIJ into daily clinical practice. There are no indications that 'upgrading' of methodological quality would have improved the final conclusions. With respect to pain provocation tests, the findings did not show the same trend. Two studies demonstrated reliable results using the Gaenslen test and the Thigh thrust test. One study showed acceptable reliability for five other pain provocation tests; however, since other authors have described contradictory results, there is a necessity for further research in this area with an emphasis on multiple test scores and pain provocation tests of the SIJ.     

Intraexaminer Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry in the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review

ObjectiveTo summarize and appraise the literature on the intraexaminer reliability of hand-held dynamometry (HHD) in the upper extremity.Data SourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched for relevant studies published up to December 2011. In addition, experts were contacted, and journals and reference lists were hand searched.Study SelectionTo be included in the review, articles needed to (1) use a repeated-measures, within-examiner(s) design; (2) include symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals, or both; (3) use HHD to measure muscle strength in any of the joints of the shoulder, elbow, or wrist with the “make” or the “break” technique; (4) report measurements in kilogram, pound, or torque; (5) use a device that is placed between the examiner's hand and the subject's body; and (6) present estimates of intraexaminer reliability.Data ExtractionQuality assessment and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently.Data SynthesisFifty-four studies were included, of which 26 (48%) demonstrated acceptable intraexaminer reliability. Seven high-quality studies showed acceptable reliability for flexion and extension of the elbow in healthy subjects. Conflicting results were found for shoulder external rotation and abduction. Reliability for all other movements was unacceptable. Higher estimates were reached for within-sessions reliability and if means of trials were used.ConclusionsIntraexaminer reliability of HHD in upper extremity muscle strength was acceptable only for elbow measurements in healthy subjects. We provide specific recommendations for future research. Physical therapists should not rely on HHD measurements for evaluation of treatment effects in patients with upper extremity disorders.     

Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities

This study was designed to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliability of maximal muscle strength for upper and lower extremity muscle groups. Four healthy subjects were tested with a portable muscle dynamometer on two separate occasions by three separate examiners to determine maximal isometric strength of lateral pinch between thumb and index finger, elbow flexion, elbow extension, shoulder flexion, hip flexion, hip extension, hip abduction, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion. A break test was also used to evaluate the strength of cervical flexor muscles and extensor hallucis longus. Pearson correlation coefficients for inter- and intraexaminer testing was good for upper extremity test values from 0.85 to 0.99. The variation coefficient of the methodology error (CV) in all upper extremity muscle tests was between 5.1% and 8.3%. These results seemed reliable for clinical muscle strength testing. However, correlation coefficients for lower extremity testing were poor, with values ranging from -0.20 to 0.96. The CV in these tests was much greater than in the upper extremities and ranged from 11.3% to 17.8%. Both break tests also had high CV, with each being greater than 17%. Our results demonstrate that although the dynamometer is reliable for testing upper extremity muscle groups, it is unreliable for testing lower extremity muscle groups. Further work is needed to evaluate muscle strength quantitatively in the clinical setting in an accurate, valid, and reliable manner.     

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Sialography in the Diagnosis of Various Salivary Gland Disorders: An Interobserver Agreement

ObjectivesThis study was conducted to evaluate the interobserver agreement on the diagnostic ability and quality of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) together with magnetic resonance (MR) sialography in the assessment of various salivary gland disorders.Materials and MethodsSix patients (four men and two women, age range = 24–45 years old) with salivary gland disorders were included, and seven glands were examined. All patients underwent MRI (T1 and T2 sequences) and MR sialography (single-section single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence) using a surface coil. A scoring system was performed by three observers on 12 criteria for MRI and MR sialographic image interpretation. Interobserver agreement was performed using the Cohen kappa test, and the κ values were computed.ResultsThe overall κ values of the interobserver agreement between the three observers revealed an almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.97) on two-level decisions and a substantial agreement (κ = 0.77, κ = 0.74, and κ = 0.77) on four-level, image quality, and total decisions, respectively.ConclusionsThe overall almost perfect to substantial interobserver agreement through the diagnostic criteria used denoted the effectiveness of MRI and MR sialography using single-section single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence with a relatively low acquisition time and a surface coil in the diagnosis of various salivary gland disorders; however, efforts should be made in improving the radiologist training to reduce variability in interpretation that will increase the effectiveness of these imaging modalities.     

Unstable Lumbar Segment

Abstract

The literature recommended the use of a large number of clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). The reliability and validity of several of the SIJ tests, individually or in combination, have been investigated or discussed by a number of authors, with poor outcomes being claimed in several cases. With respect to some of the tests, the literature included differing accounts concerning the constitution of a positive result to the test. The definitions of a positive result of many of the SIJ tests were imprecise. These differences and lack of precision might contribute to the poor intertester reliability of the tests concerned. The same subject could be assessed as being positive on a particular test by one investigator using one set of criteria, and negative on the same test by another investigator using a different set of criteria. Greater precision and standardisation of definition was recommended.     

Inter- and intrarater reliability of isokinetic thigh muscle strength tests in postmenopausal women with osteopenia

Eitzen I, Hakestad KA, Risberg MA. Inter- and intrarater reliability of isokinetic thigh muscle strength tests in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.ObjectiveTo evaluate inter- and intrarater reliability of isokinetic muscle strength measurements during knee extension and flexion in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.DesignReliability study assessing inter- and intrarater reliability.SettingGeneral community.ParticipantsA convenience sample of 27 postmenopausal women (mean age ± SD, 68.2±7.3y) with defined osteopenia from a bone mineral density T score of less than 1.5 and a wrist fracture within the last 2 years.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresIsokinetic concentric muscle strength during knee extension and flexion was measured for 2 test conditions: 5 repetitions at 60°/s, and 25 repetitions at 180°/s. Agreement between tests was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1). Mean difference between tests, standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%), and smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. SRD% and SEM% are emphasized in the results to allow congruent comparisons between the different test conditions.ResultsICC_2,1 reflected high agreement both for inter- and intrarater reliability, with most of the values .90 or greater. There were no significant differences between the left and the right leg at any of the 3 tests. Some differences were apparent between the test sessions, but these were not systematic. Agreements were overall higher for assessments during knee extension than knee flexion. The SEM% was between 3.5% and 10.2% for knee extension, and 7.0% and 17.7% for knee flexion. SRD% was suggested to be between 15% and 20% for knee extension, and 25% and 30% for knee flexion.ConclusionsIsokinetic assessments of thigh muscle strength in postmenopausal women with osteopenia are of high reliability, with a level of agreement comparable to the levels found in previous reliability studies concerning both the healthy elderly and elderly with different health conditions. The measurement errors are small to moderate. The established SRD% provides thresholds for whether observed changes in strength in this patient group represent true change, which allows evaluations of minimal clinical importance in future studies.     

Cervical spine ROM measurements: optimizing the testing protocol by using a 3D ultrasound-based motion analysis system

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-examiner reliability and validity of neck range of motion (ROM) measurements. Thirty-five healthy subjects were assessed in all neck movements from two initial positions, sitting and standing, actively (open and closed eyes) and passively by using a 3D ultrasound-based motion analysis device (Zebris). Three tests were employed to assess intra-examiner reliability and two examiners used for the inter-examiner reliability. X-rays in neck flexion and extension were used to validate the Zebris system. The standing position yielded higher intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values (>0.86) with less error [smallest detectable difference (SDD)<13.8%] than sitting (ICC>0.79, SDD<14%). Passive assessment of neck ROM presented better reproducibility than active assessment with open or closed eyes in both positions. The inter-examiner reliability was moderate (ICC=0.43-0.68). The correlation between the Zebris system and X-rays was high in both flexion and extension movements. The results showed that the most reliable protocol for assessment of neck ROM is a passive measurement in the standing position. The measurements were well validiated against X-rays and the experience of the investigators must be considered before any comparison among studies is employed.     

Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test. STUDY DESIGN: In a test-retest study the incidence of asymmetric or symmetric sacroiliac joint motion was investigated with the Gillet test. METHODS: Forty-one male subjects volunteered for this study (mean age, 23 +/- 2.24 years). Thirty-eight subjects were examined in the first test procedure, and at least 4 days later 37 subjects were examined again. The subjects were subdivided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups on the basis of certain criteria. RESULTS: To obtain the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability values, Cohen's kappa, the percentage agreement, bias-adjusted kappa, and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa were used. The mean Cohen's kappa did not exceed the value of 0.081. Only the percentage agreement of the symptomatic group did exceed the minimum level of 80%. When kappa was positive, the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa was markedly higher than kappa; when kappa was negative, the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa was only slightly higher than kappa. Only small differences were found between kappa and bias-adjusted kappa. CONCLUSION: The Gillet test, as performed in this study, does not appear to be reliable.     

Diagnostic Tests for Mechanical Dysfunction of the Sacroiliac Joints

Abstract

Despite almost a century of management of mechanical dysfunction of the sacroiliac joints, no testing procedures have been satisfactorily validated for diagnosis. This paper presents tests that proved to be the most reliable for the management of 57 patients referred by their GPs for treatment of back and leg pain. The patients all regained normal pain-free function after manipulation of the sacroiliac joint(s) followed by a program of modified living and progressively increased walking. The tests include a version of Gillet's test (alternate hip and knee flexion in support standing) revised by the author, passive hip rotations in supine with 90 degrees of hip and knee flexion, and palpation of the superior ligament of the symphysis pubis. This paper proposes that when performed as described, these four tests are worth validating for the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction.     

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test to assess total mobility when bending forward in standing position. DESIGN: Experimental, prospective, correlational. SETTING: Rehabilitation and radiology departments in a university hospital in France. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients (6 women, 4 men; mean age, 42yr) with chronic low back pain (LBP) in the validity study; 32 LBP patients (16 women, 16 men; mean age, 52yr) in the reliability study; and 72 LBP patients (22 women, 50 men; mean age, 30yr) in the responsiveness study. INTERVENTIONS: Dynamic radiographs and fingertip-to-floor test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For the validity study, 2 lateral radiographs of the upper dorsal spine, 1 in neutral position, and then 1 in full trunk flexion, were made. Validity was assessed by means of Spearman's correlation coefficient. Reliability was studied by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Responsiveness was assessed by the effect size and the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: The Spearman's correlation coefficient for trunk flexion assessed by the test and the radiologic measure was excellent (r(s) = -.96). The intra- and interobserver reliability were excellent (ICC = .99). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. The values observed for the test were .97 for SRM and .87 for effect size. CONCLUSIONS: Because the fingertip-to-floor test has excellent validity, reliability, and responsiveness, it can be used in clinical practice and therapeutic trials.