Meperidine Decreases the Shivering Threshold Twice as Much as the Vasoconstriction Threshold

Background: Meperidine administration is a more effective treatment for shivering than equianalgesic doses of other opioids. However, it remains unknown whether meperidine also profoundly impairs other thermoregulatory responses, such as sweating or vasoconstriction. Proportional inhibition of vasoconstriction and shivering suggests that the drug acts much like alfentanil and anesthetics but possesses greater thermoregulatory than analgesic potency. In contrast, disproportionate inhibition would imply a special antishivering mechanism. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that meperidine administration produces a far greater concentration-dependent reduction in the shivering than vasoconstriction threshold.

Methods: Nine volunteers were each studied on three days: 1) control (no opioid); 2) a target total plasma meperidine concentration of 0.6 micro gram/ml (40 mg/h); and 3) a target concentration of 1.8 micro gram/ml (120 mg/h). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then subsequently reduced to elicit vasoconstriction and shivering. Core-temperature thresholds (at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees Celsius) were computed using established linear cutaneous contributions to control sweating (10%) and vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). The dose-dependent effects of unbound meperidine on thermoregulatory response thresholds was then determined using linear regression. Results are presented as means +/- SDs.

Results: The unbound meperidine fraction was [nearly equal] 35%. Meperidine administration slightly increased the sweating threshold (0.5 +/- 0.8 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r2 = 0.51 +/- 0.37) and markedly decreased the vasoconstriction threshold (-3.3 +/- 1.5 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r sup 2 = 0.92 +/- 0.08). However, meperidine reduced the shivering threshold nearly twice as much as the vasoconstriction threshold (-6.1 +/- 3.0 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r2 = 0.97 +/- 0.05; P = 0.001).     

Doxapram only slightly reduces the shivering threshold in healthy volunteers

We determined the effects of doxapram on the major autonomic thermoregulatory responses in humans. Nine healthy volunteers were studied on 2 days: control and doxapram (IV infusion to a plasma concentration of 2.4 +/- 0.8, 2.5 +/- 0.9, and 2.6 +/- 1.1 microg/mL at the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds, respectively). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating, then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We determined the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds with compensation for changes in skin temperature. Data were analyzed with paired t-tests and presented as mean +/- sd; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Doxapram did not change the sweating (control: 37.5 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees C, doxapram: 37.3 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees C; P = 0.290) or the vasoconstriction threshold (36.8 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees C versus 36.4 degrees +/- 0.5 degrees C; P = 0.110). However, it significantly reduced the shivering threshold from 36.2 degrees +/- 0.5 degrees C to 35.7 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees C (P = 0.012). No sedation or symptoms of panic were observed on either study day. The observed reduction in the shivering threshold explains the drug's efficacy for treatment of postoperative shivering; however, a reduction of only 0.5 degrees C is unlikely to markedly facilitate induction of therapeutic hypothermia as a sole drug.     

Nefopam, a nonsedative benzoxazocine analgesic, selectively reduces the shivering threshold in unanesthetized subjects

BACKGROUND: The analgesic nefopam does not compromise ventilation, is minimally sedating, and is effective as a treatment for postoperative shivering. The authors evaluated the effects of nefopam on the major thermoregulatory responses in humans: sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering. METHODS: Nine volunteers were studied on three randomly assigned days: (1) control (saline), (2) nefopam at a target plasma concentration of 35 ng/ml (low dose), and (3) nefopam at a target concentration of 70 ng/ml (high dose, approximately 20 mg total). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The authors determined the thresholds (triggering core temperature at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees C) by mathematically compensating for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response. RESULTS: Nefopam did not significantly modify the slopes for sweating (0.0 +/- 4.9 degrees C. microg-1. ml; r2 = 0.73 +/- 0.32) or vasoconstriction (-3.6 +/- 5.0 degrees C. microg-1. ml; r2 = -0.47 +/- 0.41). In contrast, nefopam significantly reduced the slope of shivering (-16.8 +/- 9.3 degrees C. microg-1. ml; r2 = 0.92 +/- 0.06). Therefore, high-dose nefopam reduced the shivering threshold by 0.9 +/- 0.4 degrees C (P < 0.001) without any discernible effect on the sweating or vasoconstriction thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Most drugs with thermoregulatory actions-including anesthetics, sedatives, and opioids-synchronously reduce the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. However, nefopam reduced only the shivering threshold. This pattern has not previously been reported for a centrally acting drug. That pharmacologic modulations of vasoconstriction and shivering can be separated is of clinical and physiologic interest.     

Nefopam, a Nonsedative Benzoxazocine Analgesic, Selectively Reduces the Shivering Threshold in Unanesthetized Subjects

Background: The analgesic nefopam does not compromise ventilation, is minimally sedating, and is effective as a treatment for postoperative shivering. The authors evaluated the effects of nefopam on the major thermoregulatory responses in humans: sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering.

Methods: Nine volunteers were studied on three randomly assigned days: (1) control (saline), (2) nefopam at a target plasma concentration of 35 ng/ml (low dose), and (3) nefopam at a target concentration of 70 ng/ml (high dose, approximately 20 mg total). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The authors determined the thresholds (triggering core temperature at a designated skin temperature of 34[degrees]C) by mathematically compensating for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response.

Results: Nefopam did not significantly modify the slopes for sweating (0.0 +/- 4.9[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = 0.73 +/- 0.32) or vasoconstriction (-3.6 +/- 5.0[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = -0.47 +/- 0.41). In contrast, nefopam significantly reduced the slope of shivering (-16.8 +/- 9.3[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = 0.92 +/- 0.06). Therefore, high-dose nefopam reduced the shivering threshold by 0.9 +/- 0.4[degrees]C (P < 0.001) without any discernible effect on the sweating or vasoconstriction thresholds.     

Buspirone and meperidine synergistically reduce the shivering threshold.

Mild hypothermia (i.e., 34 degrees C) may prove therapeutic for patients with stroke, but it usually provokes shivering. We tested the hypothesis that the combination of buspirone (a serotonin 1A partial agonist) and meperidine synergistically reduces the shivering threshold (triggering tympanic membrane temperature) to at least 34 degrees C while producing little sedation or respiratory depression. Eight volunteers each participated on four randomly-assigned days: 1) large-dose oral buspirone (60 mg); 2) large-dose IV meperidine (target plasma concentration of 0.8 microg/mL); 3) the combination of buspirone (30 mg) and meperidine (0.4 microg/mL); and 4) a control day without drugs. Core hypothermia was induced by infusion of lactated Ringer's solution at 4 degrees C. The control shivering threshold was 35.7 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C. The threshold was 35.0 degrees C +/- 0.8 degrees C during large-dose buspirone and 33.4 degrees C +/- 0.3 degrees C during large-dose meperidine. The threshold during the combination of the two drugs was 33.4 degrees C +/- 0.7 degrees C. There was minimal sedation on the buspirone and combination days and mild sedation on the large-dose meperidine day. End-tidal PCO2 increased approximately 10 mm Hg with meperidine alone. Buspirone alone slightly reduced the shivering threshold. The combination of small-dose buspirone and small-dose meperidine acted synergistically to reduce the shivering threshold while causing little sedation or respiratory toxicity. IMPLICATIONS: Mild hypothermia may be an effective treatment for acute stroke, but it usually triggers shivering, which could be harmful. Our results indicate that the combination of small-dose buspirone and small-dose meperidine acts synergistically to reduce the shivering threshold while causing little sedation or respiratory toxicity. This combination may facilitate the induction of therapeutic hypothermia in stroke victims.     

Dantrolene reduces the threshold and gain for shivering

Dantrolene is used for treatment of life-threatening hyperthermia, yet its thermoregulatory effects are unknown. We tested the hypothesis that dantrolene reduces the threshold (triggering core temperature) and gain (incremental increase) of shivering. Healthy volunteers were evaluated on 2 random days: control and dantrolene (approximately 2.5 mg/kg plus a continuous infusion). In Study 1, 9 men were warmed until sweating was provoked and then cooled until arteriovenous shunt constriction and shivering occurred. Sweating was quantified on the chest using a ventilated capsule. Absolute right middle fingertip blood flow was quantified using venous-occlusion volume plethysmography. A sustained increase in oxygen consumption identified the shivering threshold. In Study 2, 9 men were given cold lactated Ringer's solution i.v. to reduce core temperature approximately 2 degrees C/h. Cooling was stopped when shivering intensity no longer increased with further core cooling. The gain of shivering was the slope of oxygen consumption versus core temperature regression. In Study 1, sweating and vasoconstriction thresholds were similar on both days. In contrast, shivering threshold decreased 0.3 +/- 0.3 degrees C, P = 0.004, on the dantrolene day. In Study 2, dantrolene decreased the shivering threshold from 36.7 +/- 0.2 to 36.3 +/- 0.3 degrees C, P = 0.01 and systemic gain from 353 +/- 144 to 211 +/- 93 mL.min(-1).degrees C(-1), P = 0.02. Thus, dantrolene substantially decreased the gain of shivering, but produced little central thermoregulatory inhibition. IMPLICATIONS: Dantrolene substantially decreases the gain of shivering but produces relatively little central thermoregulatory inhibition. It thus seems unlikely to prove more effective than conventional muscle relaxants for treatment of life-threatening hyperthermia.     

A comparison among nalbuphine, meperidine, and placebo for treating postanesthetic shivering

Postanesthetic shivering (PS) is distressing for patients and may induce a variety of complications. In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, we evaluated the value of nalbuphine, compared with meperidine and saline, for treating PS. Ninety adult patients were included in the study. Group 1 (n = 30) received i.v. nalbuphine 0.08 mg/kg, Group 2 (n = 30) received i.v. meperidine 0.4 mg/kg, and Group 3 (n = 30) received i.v. saline. Treatment that stopped shivering was considered to have been successful. The results demonstrated that, 5 min after treatment, both nalbuphine and meperidine provided a rapid and potent anti-shivering effect on PS, with high response rates of 80% and 83%, compared with those of saline (0%) (P < 0.01). Thirty minutes after injection, the response rates of nalbuphine and meperidine were 90% and 93%, respectively, compared with 17% in the saline group (P < 0.01). The differences between nalbuphine and meperidine were not significant. We conclude that nalbuphine may be an alternative to meperidine for treating PS. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated nalbuphine versus meperidine and saline for treating postanesthetic shivering. Our results demonstrate that both nalbuphine and meperidine provide a similar rapid and potent anti-shivering effect. Nalbuphine may be an alternative to meperidine for treating postanesthetic shivering.     

Pharmacological treatment of postoperative shivering: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Shivering is a frequent complication in the postoperative period. The relative efficacy of interventions that are used for the treatment of postoperative shivering is not well understood. We performed a systematic search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, hand searching, all languages, to August, 2000) for full reports of randomized comparisons of any pharmacological antishivering intervention (active) with placebo (control) in the postoperative period. Dichotomous data on absence of further shivering after treatment and adverse effects were extracted from original reports. Relative risk (RR) and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed effect model. Data from 20 trials (944 adults received an active intervention, 413 were controls) were analyzed. Antishivering efficacy depended on the active regimen and the length of follow-up. Efficacy with meperidine 25 mg, clonidine 150 microg, ketanserin 10 mg, and doxapram 100 mg was reported in at least three trials; all were significantly more effective than control. After 1 min, the NNT of meperidine 25 mg for no further shivering compared with placebo was 2.7 (RR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.5-18.5). After 5 min, the NNT of meperidine 25 mg was 1.3 (RR, 9.6; 95% CI, 5.7-16), the NNT of clonidine 150 microg was 1.3 (RR, 6.8; 95% CI, 3.3-14.2), the NNT of doxapram 100 mg was 1.7 (RR 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4-6.5), and the NNT of ketanserin 10 mg was 2.3 (RR 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.1). After 10 min, the NNT of meperidine 25 mg was 1.5 (RR 4.0; 95% CI, 2.5-6.2). After 15 min, the NNT of ketanserin 10 mg was 3.3 (RR 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9). Long-term outcome data were lacking. There were not enough data for alfentanil, fentanyl, morphine, nalbuphine, lidocaine, magnesium, metamizol, methylphenidate, nefopam, pentazocine, and tramadol to draw meaningful conclusions. Reporting of adverse drug reactions was sparse. Fewer than two shivering patients need to be treated with meperidine 25 mg, clonidine 150 microg, or doxapram 100 mg for one to stop shivering within 5 min who would have continued to shiver had they all received a placebo. IMPLICATIONS: Less than two shivering patients need to be treated with meperidine 25 mg, clonidine 150 microg, or doxapram 100 mg for one to stop shivering within 5 min who would have continued to shiver had they all received a placebo.     

Meperidine and Alfentanil Do Not Reduce the Gain or Maximum Intensity of Shivering

Background: Thermoregulatory shivering can be characterized by its threshold (triggering core temperature), gain (incremental intensity increase with further core temperature deviation), and maximum intensity. Meperidine (a combined micro- and kappa-agonist) treats shivering better than equianalgesic doses of pure micro-opioid agonists. Meperidine's special antishivering action is mediated, at least in part, by a disproportionate decrease in the shivering threshold. That is, meperidine decreases the shivering threshold twice as much as the vasoconstriction threshold, whereas alfentanil (a pure micro-agonist) decreases the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds comparably. However, reductions in the gain or maximum shivering intensity might also contribute to the clinical efficacy of meperidine. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that meperidine reduces the gain and maximum intensity of shivering much more than alfentanil does.

Methods: Ten volunteers were each studied on three separate days: (1) control (no drug); (2) a target total plasma meperidine concentration of 1.2 micro gram/ml; and (3) a target plasma alfentanil concentration of 0.2 micro gram/ml. Skin temperatures were maintained near 31 [degree sign] Celsius, and core temperatures were decreased by central-venous infusion of cold lactated Ringer's solution until maximum shivering intensity was observed. Shivering was evaluated using oxygen consumption and electromyography. A sustained increase in oxygen consumption identified the shivering threshold. The gain of shivering was calculated as the slope of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature regression, and as the slope of electromyographic intensity versus core temperature regression.

Results: Meperidine and alfentanil administration significantly decreased the shivering thresholds. However, neither meperidine nor alfentanil reduced the gain of shivering, as determined by either oxygen consumption or electromyography. Opioid administration also failed to significantly decrease the maximum intensity of shivering.     

A comparison of urapidil, clonidine, meperidine and placebo in preventing postanesthetic shivering

This placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of urapidil compared with clonidine and meperidine in preventing postanesthetic shivering, which is common after anesthesia administration and may be very distressing. We studied 120 patients undergoing elective abdominal or orthopedic surgery under standardized general anesthesia. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups (each group n = 30) using a double-blinded protocol: Group A received 0.2 mg/kg urapidil; Group B, 3 microg/kg clonidine; Group C, 0.4 mg/kg meperidine; and Group D, saline 0.9% as placebo. Postanesthetic shivering was scored by using a five-point scale. Clonidine and meperidine significantly reduced the incidence and the severity of shivering in comparison with placebo, whereas there were no significant differences between the urapidil and placebo groups. Both clonidine and meperidine caused a significantly prolonged emergence time (13.4 +/- 5.8 and 13. 3 +/- 5.0 min, respectively) compared with placebo (10.4 +/- 5.3 min) and urapidil (11.4 +/- 2.9 min). We confirmed that both clonidine and meperidine are effective in preventing postanesthetic shivering, whereas urapidil, in our setting and dosage, was not effective. Patients who received clonidine or meperidine had a prolonged emergence time. In the dosage used, urapidil seems to be unable to prevent postanesthetic shivering. IMPLICATIONS: Shivering (irregular muscle activity) is common after surgery and anesthesia. This study compared urapidil (an antihypertensive drug) as a prophylaxis with two established antishivering drugs (meperidine and clonidine) and placebo. In the dosage used, we were unable to show a significant benefit of urapidil.     

A comparison of tramadol, amitriptyline, and meperidine for postepidural anesthetic shivering in parturients.

Tramadol is effective for treating shivering during epidural anesthesia in parturients. In addition to its low affinity to opioid receptors, tramadol exerts a modulatory effect on central monoaminergic pathways. In this respect, there are parallels between the mechanisms of the action of tramadol and antidepressants such as amitriptyline. Meperidine is often recommended for the treatment of postanesthetic shivering. This prospective, double-blinded, and randomized clinical study was performed to compare the antishivering effects and accompanying side effects among tramadol, meperidine, and amitriptyline for the treatment of postepidural anesthetic shivering. Forty-five parturients who shivered during cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia and requested antishivering treatment were randomly allocated to one of three groups for IV treatment: Group T (n = 15) received tramadol 0.5 mg/kg, Group M (n = 15) received meperidine 0.5 mg/kg, and Group A (n = 15) received amitriptyline 15 or 20 mg. The response rate (shivering ceased after treatment in 15 min) was 87% and 93% for Groups T and M, respectively, compared with 13% in Group A (P < 0.01). The time that elapsed from treatment to the time shivering ceased was 5.1 +/- 3.6 min (mean +/- SD) for Group T and 4.2 +/- 2.3 min for Group M. There was a significantly more frequent incidence (33%) of somnolence in Group M when compared with Groups T (7%) and A (0%) (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were shown for pruritus, nausea, vomiting, or Apgar scores of newborns. We concluded that both tramadol and meperidine show a significantly faster response rate in the treatment of postepidural anesthetic shivering when compared with amitriptyline in the dosage used; tramadol had a decreased incidence of somnolence when compared with meperidine. IMPLICATIONS: This study was performed to compare the antishivering and side effects among tramadol, amitriptyline, and meperidine for the treatment of postepidural anesthetic shivering in parturients. Both tramadol and meperidine show a significantly faster response rate in the treatment of shivering when compared with amitriptyline. Tramadol had a less frequent incidence of somnolence than meperidine.     

Sweating threshold during isoflurane anesthesia in humans

Isoflurane anesthesia in humans markedly decreases the threshold temperature triggering peripheral thermoregulatory vasoconstriction (i.e., central temperature triggering vasoconstriction). However, it is not known whether the sweating threshold remains unchanged (e.g., near 37 degrees C), decreases along with the vasoconstriction threshold, or increases during anesthetic administration. Accordingly, the hypothesis that isoflurane anesthesia increases the thermoregulatory threshold for sweating was tested. Forehead sweating was evaluated in five healthy patients given isoflurane anesthesia. The sweating threshold was prospectively defined as the distal esophageal temperature at which significant sweating was first observed. Sweating was observed in each patient at a mean central temperature of 38.3 +/- 0.3 degrees C and an end-tidal isoflurane concentration of 1.1% +/- 0.2%. The interthreshold range (difference between vasoconstriction and sweating thresholds) without anesthesia is approximately 0.5 degrees C; isoflurane anesthesia increases this range to approximately 4 degrees C.     

Dexmedetomidine Does Not Alter the Sweating Threshold, But Comparably and Linearly Decreases the Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds

Background: Clonidine decreases the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. It thus seems likely that the alpha2 agonist dexmedetomidine will also impair control of body temperature. Accordingly, the authors evaluated the dose-dependent effects of dexmedetomidine on the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds. They also measured the effects of dexmedetomidine on heart rate, blood pressures, and plasma catecholamine concentrations.

Methods: Nine male volunteers participated in this randomized, double-blind, cross-over protocol. The study drug was administered by computer-controlled infusion, targeting plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations of 0.0, 0.3, and 0.6 ng/ml. Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then subsequently reduced to elicit vasoconstriction and shivering. Core-temperature thresholds were computed using established linear cutaneous contributions to control of sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering. The dose-dependent effects of dexmedetomidine on thermoregulatory response thresholds were then determined using linear regression. Heart rate, arterial blood pressures, and plasma catecholamine concentrations were determined at baseline and at each threshold.

Results: Neither dexmedetomidine concentration increased the sweating threshold from control values. In contrast, dexmedetomidine administration reduced the vasoconstriction threshold by 1.61 +/- 0.80 [degree sign] Celsius [center dot] ng sup -1 [center dot] ml (mean +/- SD) and the shivering threshold by 2.40 +/- 0.90 [degree sign] Celsius [center dot] ng sup -1 [center dot] ml. Hemodynamic responses and catecholamine concentrations were reduced from baseline values, but they did not differ at the two tested dexmedetomidine doses.     

Single-dose parenteral pharmacological interventions for the prevention of postoperative shivering: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Shivering is a frequent complication in the postoperative period. The relative efficacy of pharmacological interventions to prevent this phenomenon is not well understood. We performed a systematic search for full reports of randomized comparisons of prophylactic, parenteral, single-dose antishivering interventions with inactive control (placebo or no treatment). Variable doses were converted to fixed doses. Dichotomous data on the absence of shivering were analyzed by using relative benefit (RB) and number needed to treat (NNT) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data from 27 trials (1348 adults received an antishivering intervention; 931 were controls) were analyzed. The average incidence of shivering in controls was extremely frequent (52%). Clonidine 65-300 microg (1078 patients), meperidine 12.5-35 mg (250 patients), tramadol 35-220 mg (250 patients), and nefopam 6.5-11 mg (204 patients) were tested in at least 3 trials each. All were more effective than control. For clonidine, meperidine, and nefopam, there was some weak evidence of dose responsiveness. For small-dose clonidine (65-110 microg), the RB compared with control was 1.32 (95% CI, 1.16-1.51); for medium-dose clonidine (140-150 microg), the RB was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.47-2.27); and for large-dose clonidine (220-300 microg), the RB was 1.52 (95% CI, 1.30-1.78). For all clonidine regimens combined, the RB was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.43-1.74), with an NNT of 3.7. For all meperidine regimens combined, the RB was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.37-2.03), with an NNT of 3. For all tramadol regimens combined, the RB was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.56-2.39), with an NNT of 2.2. For all nefopam regimens combined, the RB was 2.62 (95% CI, 2.02-3.40), with an NNT of 1.7. Methylphenidate, midazolam, dolasetron, ondansetron, physostigmine, urapidil, and flumazenil were tested in no more than 3 trials each, with a limited number of patients.     

Propofol Linearly Reduces the Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds

Background: Skin temperature is best kept constant when determining response thresholds because both skin and core temperatures contribute to thermoregulatory control. In practice, however, it is difficult to evaluate both warm and cold thresholds while maintaining constant cutaneous temperature. A recent study shows that vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are a linear function of skin and core temperatures, with skin contributing 20 plus/minus 6% and 19 plus/minus 8%, respectively. (Skin temperature has long been known to contribute [nearly equal] 10% to the control of sweating.) Using these relations, we were able to experimentally manipulate both skin and core temperatures, subsequently compensate for the changes in skin temperature, and finally report the results in terms of calculated core- temperature thresholds at a single designated skin temperature.

Methods: Five volunteers were each studied on 4 days: (1) control; (2) a target blood propofol concentration of 2 micro gram/ml; (3) a target concentration of 4 micro gram/ml; and (4) a target concentration of 8 micro gram/ml. On each day, we increased skin and core temperatures sufficiently to provoke sweating. Skin and core temperatures were subsequently reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We mathematically compensated for changes in skin temperature by using the established linear cutaneous contributions to the control of sweating (10%) and to vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). From these calculated core-temperature thresholds (at a designated skin temperature of 35.7 degrees Celsius), the propofol concentration- response curves for the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds were analyzed using linear regression. We validated this new method by comparing the concentration-dependent effects of propofol with those obtained previously with an established model.

Results: The concentration-response slopes for sweating and vasoconstriction were virtually identical to those reported previously. Propofol significantly decreased the core temperature triggering vasoconstriction (slope = 0.6 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius *symbol* micro gram sup -1 *symbol* ml sup -1; r2 = 0.98 plus/minus 0.02) and shivering (slope = 0.7 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius *symbol* micro gram sup -1 *symbol* ml sup -1; r2 = 0.95 plus/minus 0.05). In contrast, increasing the blood propofol concentration increased the sweating threshold only slightly (slope = 0.1 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius *symbol* micro gram sup -1 *symbol* ml sup -1; r2 = 0.46 plus/minus 0.39).     

The effect of meperidine on thermoregulation in mice: involvement of alpha2-adrenoceptors

Meperidine has potent antishivering properties. The underlying mechanisms are not fully elucidated, but recent investigations suggest that alpha2-adrenoceptors are likely to be involved. We performed the current study to investigate the effects of meperidine on nonshivering thermogenesis in a model of thermoregulation in mice. After injection (0.1 mL/kg intraperitoneally) of saline, meperidine (20 mg/kg), the specific alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole (2 mg/kg), plus saline or atipamezole plus meperidine, respectively, mice were positioned in a Plexiglas chamber. Rectal temperature and mixed expired carbon dioxide were measured after provoking thermoregulatory effects by whole body cooling. Maximum response intensity of nonshivering thermogenesis and the thermoregulatory threshold for nonshivering thermogenesis, which was defined as the temperature at which a sustained increase in expiratory carbon dioxide can be measured, were investigated. Meperidine significantly decreased the threshold of nonshivering thermogenesis (36.6 degrees C +/- 0.7 degrees C) versus saline (37.9 degrees C +/- 0.6 degrees C) and versus atipamezole plus saline (37.8 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C; P <0.01). This effect was abolished after administration of meperidine combined with atipamezole (37.7 degrees C +/- 0.6 degrees C; P <0.05). Meperidine did not decrease the maximum intensity of nonshivering thermogenesis. The results suggest a major role of alpha2-adrenoceptors in the inhibition of thermoregulation by meperidine in mice.     

Isoflurane Produces Marked and Nonlinear Decreases in the Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds

Background: Desflurane decreases the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds disproportionately at high anesthetic concentrations. This result contrasts with the authors' previous report that isoflurane decreases the vasoconstriction threshold linearly. It is surprising that the basic shape of the concentration-response curve should differ with these two otherwise similar anesthetics. Therefore, the hypothesis that isoflurane produces a nonlinear reduction in the vasoconstriction threshold was tested. Because the effect of isoflurane on shivering remains unknown, the extent to which isoflurane reduces the shivering threshold also was determined.

Methods: Eight men volunteered to be studied on four randomly ordered days: (1) a target end-tidal isoflurane concentration of 0.55%, (2) a target concentration of 0.7%, (3) control (no anesthesia) and a target end-tidal concentration of 0.85%, and (4) a target end-tidal concentration of 1.0%. Volunteers were surface-cooled until peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering were observed. We arithmetically compensated for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control for each response. From the calculated thresholds (core temperatures triggering responses at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees C), the concentration-response relation was determined.

Results: Isoflurane administration produced a dose-dependent reduction in the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds, decreasing each [nearly equal] 4.6 degrees C at an end-tidal concentration of 1%. Residual analysis indicated that the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds were decreased in a nonlinear fashion during isoflurane administration. The vasoconstriction-to-shivering range was 1.5+/- 0.8 degree C without isoflurane, and did not change significantly during isoflurane administration.     

Upright posture reduces thermogenesis and augments core hypothermia

We recently reported that baroreceptor-mediated reflexes modulate thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during lower abdominal surgery. Accordingly, we examined the hypothesis that postural differences and the related alterations in baroreceptor loading similarly modulate the thermogenic (i.e., shivering) response to hypothermia in humans. In healthy humans (n = 7), cold saline was infused IV (30 mL/kg at 4 degrees C) for 30 min to decrease core temperature. Each participant was studied on 2 separate days, once lying supine and once sitting upright. Tympanic membrane temperature and oxygen consumption were monitored for 40 min after each saline infusion. The decrease in core temperature upon completion of the infusion in the upright posture position was 1.24 degrees C +/- 0.07 degrees C, which was significantly greater than the 1.02 degrees C +/- 0.06 degrees C seen in the supine position. The core temperature was reduced by 0.59 degrees C +/- 0.07 degrees C in the upright position but only by 0.37 degrees C +/- 0.05 degrees C in the supine position when the increase in oxygen consumption signaling thermogenic shivering occurred. Thus, the threshold temperature for thermogenesis was significantly less in the upright than the supine position. The gain of the thermogenic response did not differ significantly between the positions (363 +/- 69 mL. min(-1). degrees C(-1) for upright and 480 +/- 80 mL. min(-1). degrees C(-1) for supine). The skin temperature gradient was significantly larger in the upright than in the supine posture, suggesting that the peripheral vasoconstriction was augmented by upright posture. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations increased in response to cold saline infusion under both conditions, but the increase was significantly larger in the upright than in the supine posture. Baroreceptor unloading thus augments the peripheral vasoconstrictor and catecholamine response to core hypothermia but simultaneously reduces thermogenesis, which consequently aggravated the core temperature decrease in the upright posture. IMPLICATIONS: Upright posture attenuates the thermogenic response to core hypothermia but augments peripheral vasoconstriction. This divergent result suggests that input from the baroreceptor modifies the individual thermoregulatory efferent pathway at a site distal to the common thermoregulatory center or neural pathway.     

The effects of urapidil on thermoregulatory thresholds in volunteers

In a previous study we have shown that the antihypertensive drug, urapidil, stops postanesthetic shivering. One possible mechanism in the inhibition of postanesthetic shivering by urapidil may be alterations in thermoregulatory thresholds. We therefore studied the effects of urapidil on vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds during cold-induced shivering in volunteers. Seven healthy male volunteers were cooled by an infusion of saline at 4 degrees C on two study days separated by 48 h. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was estimated using forearm minus fingertip skin-temperature gradients, and values exceeding 0 degrees C were considered to represent significant vasoconstriction. The rectal core temperatures at the beginning of shivering and at vasoconstriction were considered the thermoregulatory thresholds. Before cooling, either 25 mg of urapidil or placebo was administered randomly and blindly to each volunteer. When shivering occurred continuously for 10 min, another 25 mg of urapidil was administered IV to completely stop shivering. Urapidil led to a decrease in core temperature at vasoconstriction and shivering threshold by 0.4 degrees C plus/minus 0.2 degrees C (P < 0.001) and 0.5 degrees C plus/minus 0.3 degrees C (P < 0.01), respectively. Oxygen consumption increased during shivering by 70% plus/minus 30% (P < 0.01) in comparison with baseline and decreased levels after shivering stopped, despite the continued low core temperature. Our investigation shows that urapidil stops postanesthetic shivering by decreasing important thermoregulatory thresholds. This means that shivering, not hypothermia, is treated, and hypothermia will need more attention in the postanesthesia care unit. IMPLICATIONS: In this study we show that the antihypertensive drug urapidil stops cold-induced shivering and decreases normal thermoregulatory responses, i.e., the thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering, in awake volunteers.     

Ondansetron does not reduce the shivering threshold in healthy volunteers

Background. Ondansetron, a serotonin-3 receptor antagonist,reduces postoperative shivering. Drugs that reduce shiveringusually impair central thermoregulatory control, and may thusbe useful for preventing shivering during induction of therapeutichypothermia. We determined, therefore, whether ondansetron reducesthe major autonomic thermoregulatory response thresholds (triggeringcore temperatures) in humans. Methods. Control (placebo) and ondansetron infusions at thetarget plasma concentration of 250 ng ml^–1 were studiedin healthy volunteers on two different days. Each day, skinand core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating; thenreduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering.We determined the core-temperature sweating, vasoconstrictionand shivering thresholds after compensating for changes in mean-skintemperature. Data were analysed using t-tests and presentedas means (SDs); P<0.05 was taken as significant. Results. Ondensetron plasma concentrations were 278 (57), 234(55) and 243 (58) ng ml^–1 at the sweating, vasoconstrictionand shivering thresholds, respectively; these corresponded to50 mg of ondansetron which is approximately 10 times the doseused for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ondansetron didnot change the sweating (control 37.4 (0.4)°C, ondansetron37.6 (0.3)°C, P=0.16), vasoconstriction (37.0 (0.5)°Cvs 37.1 (0.3)°C; P=0.70), or shivering threshold (36.3 (0.5)°Cvs 36.3 (0.6)°C; P=0.76). No sedation was observed on eitherstudy day. Conclusions. Ondansetron appears to have little potential forfacilitating induction of therapeutic hypothermia.