Intensive blood pressure control affects cerebral blood flow in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with microvascular complications, hypertension, and impaired dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Intensive blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients reduces their risk of stroke but may affect cerebral perfusion. Systemic hemodynamic variables and transcranial Doppler-determined cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), cerebral CO2 responsiveness, and cognitive function were determined after 3 and 6 months of intensive BP control in 17 type 2 diabetic patients with microvascular complications (T2DM+), in 18 diabetic patients without (T2DM-) microvascular complications, and in 16 nondiabetic hypertensive patients. Cerebrovascular reserve capacity was lower in T2DM+ versus T2DM- and nondiabetic hypertensive patients (4.6±1.1 versus 6.0±1.6 [P<0.05] and 6.6±1.7 [P<0.01], Δ%mean CBFV/mm Hg). After 6 months, the attained BP was comparable among the 3 groups. However, in contrast to nondiabetic hypertensive patients, intensive BP control reduced CBFV in T2DM- (58±9 to 54±12 cm·s(-1)) and T2DM+ (57±13 to 52±11 cm·s(-1)) at 3 months, but CBFV returned to baseline at 6 months only in T2DM-, whereas the reduction in CBFV progressed in T2DM+ (to 48±8 cm·s(-1)). Cognitive function did not change during the 6 months. Static cerebrovascular autoregulation appears to be impaired in type 2 diabetes mellitus, with a transient reduction in CBFV in uncomplicated diabetic patients on tight BP control, but with a progressive reduction in CBFV in diabetic patients with microvascular complications, indicating that maintenance of cerebral perfusion during BP treatment depends on the progression of microvascular disease. We suggest that BP treatment should be individualized, aiming at a balance between BP reduction and maintenance of CBFV.     

The elusive type 2 diabetes individual achieving tight blood pressure target: A phenotypic study

BackgroundTo describe the characteristics (therapeutic, physical and behavioural) associated with achievement of tight blood pressure (BP) control and its prevalence in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients.MethodsCross-sectional observational cohort study. 673 hypertensive patients with T2DM, treated with one or more antihypertensive drugs. Sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory variables compared between patients achieving BP targets (goal-achievers [GAs]) and non-goal-achievers (non-GAs).ResultsOnly 111 patients (16%) achieved BP goals. Markers-factors connected with failure of BP control in non-GAs were: sub-Saharan African ethno-geographical origin, high alcohol consumption and low educational level. Total cholesterol was significantly lower and glycaemic control significantly better in GAs. In addition, prevalence of micro- or macro-albuminuria was clearly lower in GAs. As regards cardiovascular drugs, statins were used to a greater extent by the GAs. Finally, GAs and non-GAs had the same pattern of micro- and macro-vascular diabetic diseases, as well as similar estimated 10-year absolute cardiovascular risk scores.ConclusionsThis cross-sectional study characterized variables associated with an unmet need in drug-treatment of hypertension in T2DM. One might surmise that using higher dosage and/or number of antihypertensive agents will be required in most T2DM patients in order to reach targets, including new antihypertensive agents.     

Home blood pressure measurements associated with better blood pressure control: the J-HOME study

The usefulness of self-measurements of blood pressure (BP) at home (home BP measurements) in hypertensive patients has been reported by many studies. Several national guidelines recommend the use of home BP measurements to achieve better hypertension control. The objective of this study was to clarify the association between home BP measurements and hypertension treatment among 2363 essential hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive drugs. Compared to the 543 (23.0%) patients who had not taken home BP measurements, the 1820 (77.0%) patients who had taken home BP measurements were significantly older, included a higher proportion of males, included a higher proportion with a family history of hypertension, took a greater number of antihypertensive drugs and alpha blockers and took antihypertensive drugs more often in the evening. Home BP measurements were associated with significantly better control of home and office BP levels. Compared to patients who had not taken home BP measurements, the adjusted odds ratios for good control of morning home BPs, evening home BPs and office BPs in patients who had taken home BP measurements were 1.46 (95% confidential interval (CI) 1.33-1.57), 1.35 (95% CI 1.21-1.47) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.37), respectively. Home BP measurements were associated with good hypertensive management. Our findings suggest that it is important that physicians recommend home BP measurements to their patients.     

Breast arterial calcifications associated with diabetes and hypertension

AIM: To investigate the relationship between breast arterial calcifications (BACs) and systemic hypertension (HT) and diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Mammograms and patient records of 2406 women who were screened for breast cancer or had undergone diagnostic mammography were reviewed retrospectively. Mammograms were evaluated for the presence of arterial calcification and results were coded. Patients who had been using insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents were included in the diabetic group; patients who had been using antihypertensive agents were included in the hypertensive group. Diabetes was defined as use of oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin and hypertension was defined as use of antihypertensive agents. RESULTS: The prevalence of BACs among diabetics (25.4) was higher than among hypertensives (17.6%). The prevalence in the nondiabetic, nonhypertensive (NDNH) group was lowest (7.3%). The prevalence increased with age. BAC was seen almost four times more in diabetic patients and three times more in hypertensive patients than in NDNH controls. CONCLUSION: BACs are associated with diabetes and hypertension. BAC on a mammogram may indicate unsuspected diabetes or hypertension, especially after 59 years of age.     

Blood pressure and lipid goal attainment in the hypertensive population in the primary care setting in Spain

Although blood pressure (BP) control is crucial in hypertensive patients, clinical practice guidelines agree that the goal of treatment should be aimed at not only decreasing BP but reducing global cardiovascular risk. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate BP, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and composite control rates in a hypertensive population in a primary care setting in Spain. Good BP control was defined as <140/90 mm Hg (<130/80 mm Hg for diabetics).LDL-C control rate was established according to the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel criteria. A total of 12,954 patients (49.9% women, aged 62.1+/-10.7 years) were included. BP was controlled in 24.8% of patients, LDL-C in 26% of patients and, when combined, in only 8.6%. The rates of control were significantly worse in high-risk subgroups, such as high-coronary-risk, diabetic, or metabolic syndrome patients. The BP and LDL-C control rates in the hypertensive population attended to daily in primary care settings in Spain are low.     

Current status of aggressive blood glucose and blood pressure control in diabetic hypertensive subjects

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The coexistence of hypertension and DM multiplies the diabetic complications manifold. Earlier studies have shown that lowering blood glucose, blood pressure (BP), or both decreases the diabetic complications. On the basis of these results, national and international guidelines have recommended aggressive blood glucose and BP control in patients with DM to glycosylated hemoglobin <7.0% and BP <130/80 mm Hg. However, several recent clinical outcomes trials have demonstrated that lowering glycosylated hemoglobin to <7.0% and BP to <130/80 mm Hg does not add any additional benefit to patients with DM and hypertension and may be detrimental to their health. The consensus of scientific opinion at present is that BP should be reduced to 130 to 139/70 to 80 mm Hg in patients with DM with increased cardiovascular risk. The investigators conducted a Medline search of English-language papers published from 1998 to 2010 regarding aggressive blood glucose and BP control in patients with DM and hypertension, and 15 pertinent reports were selected. In conclusion, a review of recent research findings suggests less aggressive control of glucose and BP, and "the lower the better" may not be defensible at present, until new data become available.     

Review of blood pressure control rates and outcomes

Despite the high prevalence of hypertension and documented benefits of blood pressure (BP) control, >40% of patients with hypertension are not controlled. A majority of uncontrolled hypertensive patients receive two or more antihypertensive drugs. The current review examined the relationship between antihypertensive combination drug therapy, achievement of goal BP, and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Articles were selected from a PubMed search using a prespecified search strategy. Randomized, controlled clinical trials of adult human subjects published in English between January 1991 and January 2013 were included. From 2319 identified articles, 28 met inclusion criteria and contained a total of 226,877 subjects. There were seven placebo-controlled studies and 21 treatment comparator and combination therapy studies. The studies included in this review reported a positive association between the degree of BP lowering, number of medications, and CV outcomes. As combination therapy became available, it was increasingly utilized in clinical trials and enabled an increased proportion of patients to achieve a prespecified BP target. Adverse events with monotherapy and combination therapy were as anticipated for the specific classes of antihypertensive therapy. Although many patients reach BP goal, combination antihypertensive therapy is often needed to reach BP goal. Effective BP lowering has been shown to result in improvements in CV outcomes.     

Diabetes,diabetic complications,and blood pressure targets

Association of diabetes with hypertension is frequent and it well known that high blood pressure potentiates the probability of diabetic patients to develop macrovascularand microvascular complications. Strong evidence obtained in a number of large scale prospective studies indicates that adequate blood pressure control in diabetic patients is highly beneficial for prevention of cardiovascular events. Nonetheless, only a limited proportion of hypertensive-diabetic individuals included in studies on anti-hypertensive treatment has met the predefined blood pressure goal. The optimal blood pressure goal to be pursued in diabetic patients with hypertension to guarantee effective protection from cardiovascular outcomes is still under intense debate and recommendations of current guidelines on hypertension treatment are still inconsistent. We comment here on the most important studies and conclude that current evidence does not conclusively support the need to reach a blood pressure target in hypertensive patients with diabetes different from nondiabetic hypertensive individuals.     

Prevalence of hypertension,control of blood pressure and treatment in hypertensive with type 2 diabetes in Hospital University Sains Malaysia

AimsTo determine the prevalence of hypertension, control of hypertension and patterns of antihypertensive medications in Malaysian type 2 diabetic patients who attended diabetes clinics in Hospital University Sains Malaysia (Tertiary Hospital).Materials and methodsThe study design was observational prospective longitudinal follow-up study; the study was conducted with sample of 1077 type 2 diabetes mellitus outpatient recruited whom attended the diabetes clinics at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) in Kelantan. The study period was from January till December 2008. Blood pressure was defined as >130/80 or use of antihypertension medications. Demographic characteristics of patients, level of blood pressure control, use of antihypertensive medications and patterns of antihypertensive therapy.ResultsThe prevalence of hypertension in Malaysian type 2 diabetic patients was 998 (92.7%),antihypertensive drugs were prescribed in 940 (94.2%) of hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus. The achievement of blood pressure control (≤130/80 mmHg) was 471 (47.2%) %. The percentage of patients receiving one, two, three, and four drugs were 253 (25.3%), 311 (31.3%), 179 (17.9%), and 197 (19.7%) respectively. Calcium channel blockers were the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents 757 (75.7%) followed by Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 446 (44.6%), and Angiotensin receptor blockers 42.4 (42.4%).ConclusionThe prevalence of hypertension is high in Malaysian type 2 diabetic patients, hypertension was not controlled to the recommended levels of blood pressure in about one-half (52.8%) of diabetes patients. Calcium channel blockers were the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents. There is an urgent need to educate both patients and health care providers of importance of achieving target of treatment in order to reduce morbidity and mortality due to diabetes with hypertension.     

Improving blood pressure control and clinical outcomes through initial use of combination therapy in stage 2 hypertension

Poor control of clinic and 24-h blood pressure (BP) is associated with enhanced risk of all cardiovascular disease events. Certain patient groups including the elderly, African-Americans, and those with hypertension and comorbid disease are difficult to control, as are patients with stage 2 hypertension (systolic BP>or=160 mmHg or diastolic BP>or=100 mmHg). It has been estimated that more than two-thirds of high-risk hypertensive patients with stage 2 hypertension and all hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus or kidney disease will require two or more antihypertensive agents from different therapeutic classes to reach BP goals. Combining agents with distinct and complementary modes of action can address different pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in hypertension and may lead to more complete and prompt reductions in BP. Tolerability may also improve, as certain classes of antihypertensive agents ameliorate adverse effects associated with other agents. Patients may benefit from fixed-dose combinations of drugs as this simplifies the regimen and may improve adherence with therapy, control of BP, and ultimately lead to reductions in cardiovascular events. Recent data and treatment guidelines support the use of a combination strategy as 'initial' antihypertensive therapy in high-risk patients with stage 2 hypertension.     

Blood pressure control in Japanese hypertensives with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension are thought to be at high risk for cardiovascular diseases. Recent guidelines for treatment of hypertension such as the JNC VI and WHO/ISH guidelines, recommend that antihypertensive agents be strated at as low as at 130/85 mmHg and that blood pressure be lowered to less than 130/85 mmHg. Our study was designed to clarify how well and to what extent blood pressure (BP) was controlled in Japanese hypertensive patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus. We interviewed two hundred physicians, randomly sellected from among the members of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) (n=98) and the Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) (n=102) and obtained information regarding five most recent cases of hypertension with (n=954 in total) and their 2 most recent cases of hypertension without diabetes (n=371 in total). The achieved BP was below 140/90 mmHg in 40.5% of non-diabetic and 38.3% of diabetic hypertensives. The percentage of patients whose BP was less than 130/85 mmHg was 10.8% in nondiabetics and 11.4% in diabetics. The average number of hypotensive agents used was 1.46 in nondiabetics and 1.52 in diabetics. Physicians prescribed more ACE inhibitors and alpha-blockers in diabetics than in nondiabetics, although Ca-antagonists were administered in more than 70% of patients irrespective of whether or not they had diabetes. In contrast, fewer beta-blockers and diuretics were administered to diabetics. These results suggest that although Japanese physicians are considering the effects of hypotensive agents on metabolism and renal function when they treat diabetic hypertensives, the achieved blood pressure in both hypertensives with and those without diabetes is insufficient, with only one of ten patients having a blood pressure less than 130/85 mmHg even among diabetics. Improved blood pressure control will therefore be needed to treat high risk groups such as patients with diabetes mellitus.     

Socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension prevalence and care: the IHPAF Study

To analyze the health disparities relative to the prevalence of arterial hypertension and its therapeutic control in the active French population, in relation to occupational categories (OC), a population of 17 359 men and 12 267 women was assessed from January 1997 to April 1998. The initial phase was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study designed to assess the incidence of arterial hypertension in a French working population. Information was collected by the worksite physician during the annual examination. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using a validated automatic device. Among subjects with a BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, patients not treated with antihypertensive drugs were invited to have an additional BP measurement, 1 month later. Overall prevalence was 16.1% for men and 9.4% for women. Both prevalence and therapeutic control of high BP were related to OCs in this study. Prevalence of hypertension was higher and maintenance of therapeutic control lower among lower OCs. In contrast, awareness of high BP and the proportion of hypertensive subjects under current treatment were not related to OCs. Educational level and low OC were significantly related to prevalence of high BP after adjustment for obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, and sedentary lifestyle in women only. A poor BP control under treatment was related to high alcohol intake and low OC in men. In women only, however, low educational level was related to high prevalence of hypertension and poor BP control under antihypertensive treatment. Inequalities in hypertension prevalence persist, with prevalence being higher among lower OCs. Social disparities were not observed, however, in awareness of their condition among hypertensive subjects and among patients for receiving versus not receiving any treatment for hypertension. In contrast, BP control under antihypertensive treatment was lower among lower OCs.     

2型糖尿病患者动态血压特点及分析：附408例动态血压监测结果

了解２型糖尿病患者动态血压特点。方法按有无糖尿病和高血压分组,对４０８例受试者进行２４小时动态血压监测。结果糖尿病伴高血压组平均收缩及收缩压负荷大于平均舒张压及舒张压负荷略小于无糖尿病的原发性高血压组,糖尿病组无论是否伴有高血压,其昼夜血压差值均小于无糖尿病的二组。     

Do agents that block the RAS truly offer renoprotective effects in early stage, nonproteinuric nephropathy?

Clinical practice guidelines from many professional societies endorse renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists as first-line antihypertensive agents in diabetes and chronic kidney disease, largely based on putative renoprotective properties that may be blood pressure (BP) independent. To evaluate the relevance of these recommendations to early stage, nonproteinuric nephropathy, studies of primary and secondary prevention of kidney disease were reviewed. Primary prevention studies were reviewed only for diabetic populations. Secondary prevention studies included hypertensive and normotensive, and diabetic and nondiabetic patients with microalbuminuria or low glomerular filtration rate. Overall, use of RAS antagonists as first-line agents does not appear to be as important as control of BP. To achieve protective levels of BP, multiple antihypertensive agents are usually required. Long-term studies with clinically relevant outcomes (death and loss of kidney function) are needed to clarify whether specific agents provide benefits beyond that of BP control in early stage, nonproteinuric nephropathy.     

Prevalence and therapeutic control of hypertension in 30,000 subjects in the workplace

-To assess blood pressure (BP) control in a French working population through the use of a careful assessment of BP based on 2 different visits in 1 month, 17 359 men and 12 267 women were evaluated from January 1997 to April 1998. The initial phase was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study designed to assess the incidence of arterial hypertension in a French working population. Information was collected by the work-site physician during the annual examination. BP was measured with a validated automatic device. Among subjects with BP >/= mm Hg, patients not treated with antihypertensive drugs were invited to have an additional BP measurement taken 1 month later. The prevalence of hypertension (BP >/= mm Hg) based on 2 visits was 16.2% in men and 9.4% in women. When the diagnosis of hypertension was based on 2 visits, its prevalence was 41% lower in men and 36% lower in women compared with that of a diagnosis based on a single visit. Accordingly, the awareness of hypertension was 49% higher in men and 40% higher in women. Overall, 12.5% of hypertensive men and 33.2% of hypertensive women taking antihypertensive medication had their BP levels lowered to < mm Hg by treatment. Although the percentage of hypertensive men and women under current treatment who were aware of their hypertension increased with age, BP control among treated subjects decreased with age. Ineffective BP control with treatment accounted for 33% of BP levels >/= mm Hg in men and 40% of those observed in women. In this large French working population, estimates of hypertension therapeutic control depend heavily on the number of BP measurements. Despite these methodological precautions, insufficient awareness of BP and insufficient BP control through treatment remain 2 major public health problems.     

Quality of life of patients receiving antihypertensive treatment

Ninety-four hypertensive patients, 52 females and 42 males, 38 to 79 years old, were investigated for quality of life under antihypertensive treatment, using a self-administered questionnaire. Their social situation, work and leisure activities and hypertension-related symptoms were evaluated when first diagnosed and after treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Of the 94 patients, 85 (90%) felt uneasiness due to hypertension, 21 (22%) felt their work was limited, and 27 (29%) reported restricted leisure activities due to hypertension. Eighteen patients (19%) had sexual problems. Females who were severely hypertensive at first visit (mean BP greater than or equal to 120 mmHg), those who were well-controlled by treatment (mean BP at last visit less than 105 mmHg), and those whose mean BP decreased markedly (decrease in mean BP greater than or equal to 20 mmHg) showed significant improvement in hypertension-related symptoms. Side effects varied depending on the antihypertensive drug used. It is recommended that the quality of life of patients be taken into consideration when choosing antihypertensive drugs.     

Current status and characteristics of hypertension control in community resident elderly Korean people: data from a Korean longitudinal study on health and aging (KLoSHa study).

Hypertension is a common disease that greatly impacts the health of the elderly. However, the status of blood pressure (BP) control in the elderly Korean population has not yet been investigated. Subjects aged 65 years or older living in Seongnam city, a suburb of Seoul, Korea, were included in this study. All subjects were evaluated by a physician, and medication was reviewed by a nurse. Seated BPs were measured by a trained nurse using standard methods. A total of 995 subjects were included in the current analysis (mean age: 76.3+/-8.7 years). The prevalence of hypertension was 68.7% in the study population, and this value increased with age, peaked in the 75-84 age group, and decreased thereafter. Only 66.1% of hypertensive patients had taken any antihypertensive medication, among which calcium channel blockers (64.2%) were most commonly used. Among the patients on antihypertensive medication, 46% were on combination drug therapy. BP was controlled in 38.5% of hypertensive patients, with systolic BP less controlled than diastolic BP, especially in the oldest-old population. The BP control rate was lower in high-risk patients of diabetes and renal disease. In conclusion, in community resident elderly populations, the BP control rate remains unsatisfactory, especially in high-risk patients. The benefit and optimal level of BP control in oldest-old population must be investigated because a lot of elderly hypertensive patients are currently being managed without definite evidence of related benefits.     

Treatment and blood pressure control in isolated systolic hypertension vs diastolic hypertension in primary care

Cross-sectional surveys on prevalence, treatment and control of hypertension could not satisfactorily distinguish between diastolic hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension because the definition of hypertension included patients under pharmacological treatment. We assessed the situation in the two types of hypertension in general practice in Belgium, based on current blood pressure (BP) measurements and on BP prior to the initiation of drug therapy. Participating physicians enrolled the first 15 at least 55-year-old men visiting the surgery, measured their BP and recorded data on medical history including pretreatment BP, drug utilization, cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage. Diastolic hypertension was defined as diastolic BP> or =90 mmHg, irrespective of systolic BP, and isolated systolic hypertension as systolic BP > or =140 mmHg and diastolic BP < 90 mmHg. Among 3761 evaluable patients, 74% were hypertensive. Among the 1533 hypertensive patients in whom blood pressure was known prior to treatment (n=965) or who were untreated at the study visit (n=568), 1164 had diastolic hypertension and 369 isolated systolic hypertension. The prevalence of antihypertensive treatment was, respectively, 75 and 25% (P<0.001) in these two types of hypertension. The odds of being treated were independently determined by type of hypertension, severity of hypertension and level of risk (P<0.001). BP was controlled in 25% of all patients with diastolic hypertension and in 13% of all patients with isolated systolic hypertension (P<0.001). About half of the treated patients with systolic hypertension were on a diuretic and/or a calcium-channel blocker. In conclusion, isolated systolic hypertension is less frequently treated than diastolic hypertension, overall BP control is poor and actual drug therapy diverges from recommendations based on placebo-controlled intervention trials.