Hereditary gastric cancer. Genetics and clinical management

Recently, germline mutations in the E-cadherin/CDH1 gene have been identified in families with an autosomal-dominant inherited predisposition to gastric cancer of the diffuse type. Criteria to define familial gastric cancer syndromes have been proposed and include review of the histopathology and pedigree analysis of any family with an aggregation of gastric cancer cases. Of families with two or more cases of diffuse gastric cancer in first- or second-degree relatives < 50 years of age or three or more cases at any age, up to half may be attributable to inherited germline mutations in the E-cadherin/CDH1 gene. Cumulative lifetime risk of developing gastric cancer in CDH1 mutation carriers is 70%, women from these families also have increased risk for developing lobular breast cancer. Prophylactic gastrectomies have been performed in several unaffected CDH1 mutation carriers; despite normal endoscopic examinations and negative gastric biopsy specimens, pathologic foci of early gastric cancer were found in all surgical specimens. Based on these results, guidelines for genetic testing, counseling and management of individuals with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer have been proposed. Raised awareness among the physician community regarding this syndrome may allow for increased detection and prevention of gastric and breast cancers in these high-risk individuals.     

Role of DNA methylation in the development of diffuse-type gastric cancer

Cancer cells exhibit two opposing methylation abnormalities: genome-wide hypomethylation and gene promoter hypermethylation. Downregulation of E-cadherin (CDH1) plays a key role in the development of diffuse-type gastric cancer, and DNA methylation is a major cause of the gene's silencing. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer is caused by germline mutation of CDH1 gene, and DNA methylation frequently serves as the second hit completely inactivating the gene. In sporadic diffuse-type gastric cancer, methylation of CDH1 is more prevalent than mutation of the gene. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinoma (EBV-associated GC) is characterized by concurrent methylation of multiple genes, and diffuse-type gastric cancer is frequently seen among EBV-associated GCs. Patients with pangastritis or enlarged-fold gastritis, which are both caused by Helicobacter pylori infection, reportedly have an increased risk for diffuse-type gastric cancer. Notably, the gastric mucosa of enlarged-fold gastritis patients exhibits CDH1 hypermethylation and genome-wide hypomethylation. These data suggest that aberrant DNA methylation is an essential promoter of carcinogenesis in individuals at high risk for diffuse-type gastric cancer.     

Genes and gastric cancer

Gastric cancer remains quite a common malignancy and counts among the most important causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Although the pathogenesis is multifactorial, familial aggregation in a significant proportion of cases suggests the importance of genetic predisposition. The association between the E-cadherin/CDH1 gene germline mutations and the development of diffuse gastric cancer was the first evidence for a molecular basis of gastric cancer in predisposed families and led many authorities in the world to produce guidelines regarding the management of such families members. The recent advances in genetics resulted in the discovery of numerous genetic events occurring during the course of gastric carcinogenesis (activation of oncogenes, silencing of tumor suppressor genes, mutations in DNA-repairing genes) and contributed to a better understanding in pathogenesis. Many genetic changes described have been found to affect tumor's biological behavior. In this article the authors attempt a review of all the molecular alterations in gastric cancer described in the literature and their impact on the management of patients with an inherited predisposition to gastric cancer. The promising role of gene therapy in the treatment of gastric cancer in the near future is also commented on.     

Familial gastric cancers with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome： A case repast

TO THE EDITOR Although the incidence of gastric cancer has declined somewhat in recent years, it remains one of the most common cancers worldwide[1], and is the most common cancer in East Asian countries such as Korea and Japan[2].In terms of the genetics of gastric cancer, mutations in CDH1 (E-cadberin) have been associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). The first germline mutation in CDH1 was reported in a large Maori HDGC family[1],with subsequent corroborations in Western and Asian HDGC families[3-5], CDH1 mutations are believed to be associated with up to 50% of HDGC families[5], but have not been linked with sporadic or intestinal types of gastric cancer[5].     

Disordered beta-catenin expression and E-cadherin/CDH1 promoter methyiation in gastric carcinoma

AIM: To investigate the distribution of beta-catenin in nuclei or membrane/cytoplasm of gastric carcinoma cells, the relationship between E-cadherin gene methylation and its expression, and the role of beta-catenin and E-cadherin as potential molecular markers in predicting tumor infiltration. METHODS: Twenty-nine cases of gastric carcinoma, classified as diffuse and intestinal variants, were selected for study. Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were purified and beta-catenin content was detected by ELISA. DNA methylation of E-cadherin/CDH1 gene promoter was studied by methylation-specific PCR and compaired with E-cadherin expression detected by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In 27 cases of gastric carcinoma, the ratio of beta-catenin content between nuclei and membrane/ cytoplasm was correlated with the T-classification (r = 0.392, P = 0.043). The significance was present between T2 and T3 groups. No correlation was detected between diffuse and intestinal variants in terms of their beta-catenin distribution. In 21 cases of diffuse variants of gastric carcinoma, there was a difference in E-cadherin expression between CDH1 gene-methylated group and non-methylated group (29 % vs 71 %, P = 0.027). No correlation between CDH1 gene methylation and T-classification was found, neither was the significance between E-cadherin expression and tumor infiltration grade. CONCLUSION: Comparative analysis of nuclear and membrane/cytoplasmic beta-catenin can predict local tumor infiltration. E-cadherin/CDH1 gene methylation is an important cause for its gene silence in diffuse variant gastric carcinoma. Methylation of CDHl gene in the absence of E-cadherin is an early event in gastric carcinogenesis.     

Disordered beta-catenin expression and E-cadherin/CDH1 promoter methylation in gastric carcinoma

AIM: To investigate the distribution of beta-catenin in nuclei or membrane/cytoplasm of gastric carcinoma cells, the relationship between E-cadherin gene methylation and its expression, and the role of beta-catenin and E-cadherin as potential molecular markers in predicting tumor infiltration. METHODS: Twenty-nine cases of gastric carcinoma, classified as diffuse and intestinal variants, were selected for study. Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins were purified and beta-catenin content was detected by ELISA. DNA methylation of E-cadherin/CDH1 gene promoter was studied by methylation-specific PCR and compaired with E-cadherin expression detected by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In 27 cases of gastric carcinoma, the ratio of beta-catenin content between nuclei and membrane/cytoplasm was correlated with the T-classification (r = 0.392, P = 0.043). The significance was present between T2 and T3 groups. No correlation was detected between diffuse and intestinal variants in terms of their beta-catenin distribution. In 21 cases of diffuse variants of gastric carcinoma, there was a difference in E-cadherin expression between CDH1 gene-methylated group and non-methylated group (29 % vs 71 %, P = 0.027). No correlation between CDH1 gene methylation and T-classification was found, neither was the significance between E-cadherin expression and tumor infiltration grade. CONCLUSION: Comparative analysis of nuclear and membrane/cytoplasmic beta-catenin can predict local tumor infiltration. E-cadherin/CDH1 gene methylation is an important cause for its gene silence in diffuse variant gastric carcinoma. Methylation of CDH1 gene in the absence of E-cadherin is an early event in gastric carcinogenesis.     

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at CDH1 promoter region in familial gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is the most frequent gastrointestinal malignancy in Mexico and the proportion of patients younger than 40 years is one of the highest reported in the world literature. Recently several families with familial diffuse gastric cancer have been identified at the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition. Germline mutations in the E-cadherin gene (CHD1) have been described that result in the development of diffuse hereditary gastric cancer in young patients. METHODS: The complete coding sequence at exons 1 to 16 and the promoter region of CDH1 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction in peripheral blood samples of two patients with early onset familial diffuse gastric cancer. RESULTS: No germline inactivating mutations of CHD1 were found on either patient. Single nucleotide polymorphisms -160 C->A were detected in the promoter region of CDH1 in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: The polymorphism -160 C->A theoretically confers an increased risk of developing diffuse gastric cancer. The relatives of these patients may an increased risk of gastric cancer among other tumors. There is presently not enough evidence to consider the -160 C->A polymorphism an etiologic factor of diffuse gastric cancer in these patients since the frequency and type of genetic alterations of CDH1 are largely unknown in the Mexican population. It will be necessary to conduct epidemiologic studies in the Mexican population to determine the influence that genetic alterations have on the genesis of diffuse gastric carcinoma.     

The E-cadherin gene (CDH1) variants T340A and L599V in gastric and colorectal cancer patients in Korea

INTRODUCTION: Germline mutations in E-cadherin (CDH1) have been reported in families with early onset, diffuse gastric cancer. More recently, mutations in CDH1 have been described in colorectal cancer cell lines. AIMS: We have investigated if germline mutations in CDH1 occur among different groups of Korean gastric and colorectal cancer patients, with and without a positive family history. METHODS: We studied 131 patients and 168 normal controls (88 Korean and 80 non-Korean). Patients were divided into five groups: group I, 20 gastric cancer patients with a family history; group II, 26 colorectal cancer patients with a family history of gastric cancer (those from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) kindred were excluded); group III, 16 HNPCC patients without identified germline mutations in hMLH1 and hMSH2; group IV, 35 gastric cancer patients without a family history; and group V, 34 colorectal cancer patients without a family history. Polymerase chain reaction, single strand conformational polymorphism analysis, direct sequencing, and genotyping for identified variants were performed. RESULTS: Several germline changes in CDH1 were found. In addition to previously described polymorphisms, we found three novel changes, two of which were missense changes (T340A and L599V). T340A was present in one patient in group III and one in group V. L599V was present in one patient in group II, in two in group III, and in one in group IV. T340A was not found in normal controls while L599V was present in two of 88 Korean controls. Patients with these variants may appear to have a tendency to early onset cancer with a positive family history, although differences in frequencies did not reach statistical significance. Genotyping results suggest that these variants might have a common origin, particularly T340A. CONCLUSION: We have described two new missense germline variants in CDH1 in various groups of Korean gastrointestinal cancer patients. Further work is required to assess if these variants increase the risk of gastrointestinal cancer.     

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

Some diffuse type gastric cancers are of hereditary origin. Their histological characteristics are poor cell differentiation and the presence of signet-ring cells. The cause is a mutation of the CDH1 gene which is responsible for abnormal E-cadherin. The transmission mode is autosomal dominant. Because of serious prognosis of symptomatic hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), the high penetrance of the gene (67% in men and 83% in women) and the young age of onset of these tumors (before the age of 40), a prophylactic gastrectomy is recommended to the mutation carriers. The search for the genetic mutation should be recommended to families corresponding to clinical criteria such as the number of affected family members, degree of relationship and age of onset of these tumors.     

The role of endoscopy in the management of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer(HDGC) syndrome is an inherited cancer risk syndrome associated with path-ogenic germline CDH1 variants. Given the high risk for developing diffuse gastric cancer, CDH1 carriers are recommended to undergo prophylactic total gastrectomy for cancer risk reduction. Current guidelines recommend upper endoscopy in CDH1 carriers prior to surgery and then annually for individuals deferring prophylactic total gastrectomy.Management of individuals from HDGC families without CDH1 pathogenic variants remains less clear, and management of families with CDH1 pathogenic variants in the absence of a family history of gastric cancer is particularly problematic at present. Despite adherence to surveillance protocols, endoscopic detection of cancer foci in HDGC is suboptimal and imperfect for facilitating decision-making. Alternative endoscopic modalities, such as chromoendoscopy,endoscopic ultrasound, and other non-white light methods have been utilized,but are of limited utility to further improve cancer detection and risk stratification in HDGC. Herein, we review what is known and what remains unclear about endoscopic surveillance for HDGC, among individuals with and without germline CDH1 pathogenic variants. Ultimately, the use of endoscopy in the management of HDGC remains a challenging arena, but one in which further research to improve surveillance is crucial.     

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer – Pathophysiology and clinical management

Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer is an autosomal dominant inherited gastric cancer syndrome caused by germline alterations in CDH1 (E-cadherin) and CTNNA1 (alpha-E-catenin) genes. Germline CDH1 alterations encompass small frameshifts, splice-site, nonsense, and missense mutations, as well as large rearrangements. Most CDH1 truncating mutations are pathogenic, and several missense CDH1 mutations have a deleterious effect on E-cadherin function. CDH1 testing should be performed in probands. Screening of at-risk individuals is indicated from the age of consent following counselling with a multidisciplinary team. In mutation-positive individuals prophylactic gastrectomy is recommended. Endoscopic surveillance is an option for those refusing/postponing gastrectomy, those with mutations of undetermined significance, and in CDH1-negative families. Ongoing research focus on the search of genetic causes other than CDH1 or CTNNA1 germline defects; assessment of the pathogenicity and penetrance of CDH1 missense mutations and identification of somatic mechanisms behind the progression from early (indolent) lesions to invasive (lethal) carcinomas.     

Familial gastric cancer - clinical management

The clinical management of familial gastric cancer is the same as that for sporadic gastric cancer at the current time. As the causative mutations for these cases are identified this should lead to the development of specific treatments which target the molecular abnormality. The only germline mutations identified so far occur within the E-cadherin gene (CDHI) and they account for approximately 30% of familial gastric cancer cases. When index patients fulfilling the clinical criteria for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome have a CDHI mutation identified then genetic testing of asymptomatic relatives should be considered. The clinical sequelae of testing positive for such a mutation are profound and therefore it is essential that counselling is given prior to genetic testing. The management options are surveillance endoscopy and prophylactic gastrectomy. In this chapter the practicalities of genetic testing are discussed as well as the pros and cons of the two management options. It is essential that experience of these rare families is pooled so that surveillance and treatment can be optimised in the future.     

New concepts of molecular biology on gastric carcinogenesis

Gastric cancer not located in the cardia still remains the second most common cancer worldwide, whereas adenocarcinoma of the cardia and gastroesophageal junction has been rapidly rising over the past two decades. Gastric cancer can be subdivided into two distinct pathologic entities, diffuse and intestinal, that have different epidemiologic and prognostic features. Various genetic and environmental factors play important roles in gastric carcinogenesis; both lead to either abnormal genes overexpression or inappropriate expression of normal genes, whose products confer the malignant phenotype. Advances have been made in the genetic changes mostly of the intestinal type; its development is probably a multistep process, as has been well described in colon cancer pathogenesis, whereas it remains tentative whether the diffuse type of malignancy follows an analogous progression. The most common genetic abnormalities in gastric cancer tend to be loss of heterozygosity of tumor suppressor genes, particularly of p53 or "Adenomatous Polyposis Coli" gene. The latter leads to gastric oncogenesis through changes related to E-cadherin-catenin complex, which plays a critical role in the maintenance of normal tissue architecture. Mutation of any of its components results in loss of cell-cell adhesion, thereby contributing to neoplasia. E-cadherin/CDH1 gene germline mutations have been recognized in families with an inherited predisposition to gastric cancer of the diffuse type. Amplification and/or overexpression of putative trophic factors have also been observed in gastric cancer. Finally, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is also involved in gastric carcinogenesis through various mechanisms, thereby necessitating H. pylori eradication in patients with gastric cancer.     

Incidence of gastric cancer and breast cancer in CDH1 (E-cadherin) mutation carriers from hereditary diffuse gastric cancer families.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Germline mutations in CDH1 are known to cause hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). Breast and colorectal cancer have also been reported in CDH1-associated HDGC. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cumulative risk of gastric and breast cancer in CDH1 mutation carriers. METHODS: Family data were collected by member groups of the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium. Eligible families had at least 3 cases of diffuse gastric cancer, and at least 1 affected member had tested positive for a mutation in CDH1. Eleven families met these criteria. We used the pedigree information to estimate penetrance using the MENDEL program. The conditional likelihood of the pedigree was maximized given the phenotype of the pedigree and genotype of the index case at ascertainment. We parameterized the model in terms of log relative risks for mutation carriers compared with risks in the general population of the United Kingdom. Noncarriers of the gene were assumed to develop the disease at population incidence rates. RESULTS: The estimated cumulative risk of gastric cancer by age 80 years was 67% for men (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 39-99) and 83% for women (95% CI, 58-99). For women, the cumulative risk of breast cancer was 39% (95% CI, 12-84). The combined risk of gastric cancer and breast cancer in women was 90% by age 80 years. CONCLUSIONS: These penetrance estimates should be useful for genetic counseling in multiple-case families. However, they may not apply to individuals with a minimal family history, in whom the risks may be lower.     

E-cadherin gene C-160A promoter polymorphism and risk of non-cardia gastric cancer in a Chinese population

AIM: To test the hypothesis that E-cadherin gene (CDH1) C-160A promoter variant genotype is associated with an increased risk for developing gastric cancer. METHODS: In this population-based case-control study of gastric cancer in Jiangsu Province, China, we performed polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) to genotype the C-160A polymorphism of CDH1 promoter in 206 non-cardia gastric cancer patients and 261 age- and sex-matched but unrelated cancer-free controls. RESULTS: The frequencies of genotypes CC, CA and AA were 57.8%, 36.4% and 5.8% in gasfric cancer cases, respectively, and 58.2%, 34.9% and 6.9% in controls respectively. The distributions of CDH1 genotypes were not significantly different between gastric cancer cases and controls (P=0.87 for genotype frequency and P=0.92 for allele frequency). Compared with the CC genotype, the CA and AA genotypes were not associated with an increased risk for non-cardia gastric cancer (adjusted odds ratios (OR)=1.15, and 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.78-1.72 for CA genotype, and OR = 0.90 and 95% CI = 0.42-2.01 for AA genotype). CONCLUSION: E-cadherin gene C-160A promoter polymorphism may not play a major role in the etiology of non-cardia gastric cancer in Chinese population.     

Impact of loss of heterozygosity of encoding phosphate and tensin homolog on the prognosis of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Encoding phosphate and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a cancer suppressor gene and it has been assumed that gene mutation and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) occurs frequently in various types of carcinoma. However, the role of LOH of PTEN and its outcome variables in gastric cancer have not been well established. In the present study, we investigated the roles of PTEN, LOH and their outcomes. METHODS: Fresh frozen tumor samples from 119 gastric cancer patients with a primary diagnosis of gastric carcinoma were evaluated for LOH of PTEN using an automated sequencer. Results were compared with pathological parameters. The median follow-up period was 559 days. RESULTS: Loss of heterozygosity of PTEN was observed in 17.1% of patients (13/76) diagnosed with gastric cancer. No particular relationship was found with any clinicopathological factor. However, the prognosis of patients with LOH of PTEN was significantly poor. Multivariate analyses revealed that vascular invasion, invasion depth, LOH of PTEN, histology and lymph node metastasis were correlated with survival of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Even though mutation of PTEN in gastric cancer has rarely been reported, according to our findings, LOH of PTEN frequently occurs in gastric cancers and is correlated with disease-related deaths. The LOH of PTEN is an independent prognostic factor and PTEN is a candidate as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in gastric cancers.     

The role of the E-cadherin/catenin complex in gastrointestinal cancer

Cancer is a genetic disease. The unstable genome of cancer cells causes tumour progression through multiple alterations in suppressor and promoter genes, leading to loss of homeostatic and gain of oncogenic functions. Invasion is the critical step in the acquisition of malignancy. It implicates a continuous molecular conversation of the cancer cells with other cells and with the extracellular matrix in which adhesion molecules are crucial. One of these, E-cadherin, is discussed in the present review. E-cadherin is a transmembrane glycoprotein that forms a complex with cytoplasmic proteins, termed catenins because they link E-cadherin to the actin cytoskeleton. E-cadherin/catenin-mediated intercellular adhesion and communication is mainly homophylic homotypic. There is compelling evidence from experiments in vitro as well as in vivo to accept that the E-cadherin/catenin complex acts as an invasion suppressor. The mechanism of this action is not only through cell-cell adhesion but also through transduction of signals to the cell's motility system. In the replication error positive human colon cancer cell line HCT-8, the alpha E-catenin gene CTNNA1 is an invasion suppressor gene. Here, the transition from the non-invasive to the invasive state was prevented by introduction into the unstable non-invasive cells of either an extra CTNNA1 or a wild type hMSH6 mismatch repair gene. beta-catenin also participates at a complex which comprises the adenomatous polyposis cancer protein APC. In colorectal cancer, mutation of either APC or beta-catenin is oncogenic. Downregulation of the E-cadherin/catenin complex may occur in several ways amongst which are gene mutations, methylation of 5'CpG dinucleotides within the promotor region of E-cadherin, tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin, cell surface expression of proteoglycans sterically hindering E-cadherin and proteolytic release of fragments from the extracellular part of E-cadherin. Upregulation of the E-cadherin/catenin complex has been realized with a series of agents, some of which can be used therapeutically. In most human gastrointestinal cancers the E-cadherin/catenin or related complexes are disturbed and this underscores their pivotal role in the progression of these tumours. Mutations of the E-cadherin gene, including germline mutations, occur in diffuse gastric carcinoma, CpG methylation around the promotor region of E-cadherin in hepatocellular carcinomas and mutations of the APC tumour suppressor gene or in the beta-catenin oncogene in most colorectal cancers. The literature agrees about the disturbance of immunohistochemical patterns of E-cadherin and catenin expression in gastrointestinal cancers. Conflicting opinions do, however, exist about the prognostic value of such immunohistochemical aberrations. We doubt that immunohistochemistry of E-cadherin or catenins add prognostic value to the already used histological grading systems. In our opinion the major benefit from understanding of the E-cadherin/catenin-mediated pathways of invasion will be the development of new anti-invasive treatment strategies.     

Familial gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Familial aggregation of gastric cancer has pointed out to a possible hereditary and genetic factor involved in the carcinogenesis of this disease. The diffuse type gastric cancer patients are frequently younger and the tumor has locally infiltrative growth pattern early in its development. Observation of families with frequent early onset gastric cancer has led to the identification of a novel gene implicated in gastric cancer susceptibility: CDH1/E-cadherin. Diffuse familiar gastric cancer is defined as any family presenting: two first-degree relatives with diffuse gastric cancer, one of them with age under 50 years or at least 3 first-degree relatives irrespective age of onset. CASE REPORT: The family reported by us does not fit in any of the classification proposed. The precise identification of these families by clinical and molecular tools is of great importance. The case reported is an example of a family that probably is a form of hereditary gastric cancer not yet fully understood. CONCLUSION: Soon there will be new criteria, possibly including genetic and molecular characteristics.     

A new mutation of E-cadherin gene in familial gastric linitis plastica cancer with extra-digestive dissemination.

Over a 12-month period, we diagnosed poorly differentiated infiltrative independent-cell gastric adenocarcinoma in two brothers and one sister aged 41 to 47 years. Their father had died from antral cancer at the age of 34 years. These cancers had two characteristic clinical features: rapid course and distant malignant dissemination. In all three patients, polymerase chain reaction-sequencing of the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene of white blood cells identified a heterozygous nonsense mutation of exon 3, producing a stop codon at position 95 (Q95X), resulting in a truncated protein. The alteration of this protein, which plays a crucial role in epithelial cell adhesion, probably explains the clinical expression in this type of familial diffuse gastric cancer.