Conscious and unconscious acoustic perception during general anesthesia]

The possibility of processing sensory information during general anesthesia and the ability to recall it postoperatively is of major ethical, medical and even theoretical importance. Auditory stimuli especially are perceived intraoperatively and remembered postoperatively. Neuropsychological experiments indicate that sensory information can be processed and recalled both at a conscious and at an unconscious level. Therefore, we have to distinguish between explicit and implicit memory. Explicit memory is characterized by an active and conscious recall of space- and time-related events, i.e., episodes in a person's life. In contrast, implicit memory recalls passively and unconsciously without being related to space and time, i.e., language and general knowledge. Experimental results from amnesic patients indicate that these two memory systems work independently from each other. Even when explicit memory is grossly impaired the function of the implicit memory may still be completely preserved. Various studies on intraoperative awareness show that explicit memory is widely eliminated during general anesthesia. The incidence of conscious awareness that can be actively recalled postoperatively is reported to be 1-3%. In contrast, the implicit memory function can be partially preserved. When implicit memory tasks or hypnosis are employed, traces of unconscious memory of intraoperative auditory information can be shown in 20-30% of the patients. These observations are of important clinical relevance, because the unconsciously recalled information about the intraoperative procedure may have a negative influence on the patient's postoperative recovery and well-being. So far it is still not known which anesthetics most reliably suppress auditory perception and conscious and unconscious memory during the intraoperative period. Therefore, future studies should focus on several different points. The anesthetic state should be defined exactly and the functional state of the auditory modality should be monitored when auditory information is presented to the patients. The recollection of intraoperative events should be investigated using implicit memory tests, because these are regarded as more sensitive than explicit memory tests.     

Intraoperative awareness

The first cases of general anesthesia were already cases with awareness. Until today, case reports of patients with awareness are published. These published cases are likely to be the top of the iceberg, as most patients with postoperative recall do not inform their anesthesiologist. Incidence of awareness with recall is between 0.1 and 0.2 %. In a large multicenter-study, incidence of recall was 0.1 % without, and 0.18 % with the use of muscle relaxants. The risk is increased with decreased doses of anesthetics, e.g. in patients with hemodynamic instability (trauma cases), patients undergoing cesarean section or cardiac surgery. Intraoperative awareness does not necessarily cause explicit (conscious) memory. Even in the absence of explicit memory, implicit (unconscious) memory can still have consequences for the patient. In the worst case, it can cause post-traumatic stress disorder. There is doubt whether patients may profit from positive suggestions given during intraoperative awareness. Recommendations to administer benzodiazepines to prevent explicit memory must be reconsidered. Complete neuromuscular block should be avoided whenever possible. If a patient is thought to be aware, he should be contacted, his situation should be explained and affirming comments should be given until consciousness is lost again. Postoperative visit should include questions about awareness and recall. The anesthetist should not disbelieve reported recall. Explanation of what had happened and referral to an experienced psychologist must be offered. Thus, the incidence of severe sequelae should decrease.     

Awareness and memory function during paediatric anaesthesia

Background: Previous research indicates a much higher incidence of awarenessduring anaesthesia in children than in adults. The present studyis the first large-scale, intraoperative assessment of awarenessduring paediatric anaesthesia using the isolated forearm technique,and the first large-scale study of memory function during paediatricanaesthesia. Methods: One hundred and eighty-four children, 5–18 yr, underwentthe isolated forearm technique during the first 17 min of surgerywhile receiving volatile anaesthesia. The isolated forearm techniquewas modified to accommodate brief or no paralysis. Bispectralindex was monitored in a subset of 54 patients. Sixteen neutralwords were played 20 times during surgery and, on recovery,implicit memory for these words was tested with a word identificationtask. Explicit memory for the surgical period was tested witha structured interview. Behavioural changes were assessed withage-appropriate questionnaires. Results: No child had explicit recall of intraoperative events on recovery,and there was no evidence of implicit memory for words presentedduring anaesthesia. Two of 184 children made unambiguous andverified responses on the modified isolated forearm technique,an incidence of intraoperative awareness of 1.1%. One of thesechildren reported that he was uncomfortable and not completelyunconscious during surgery. Neither child had implicit memoryfor the neutral words, or adverse behaviour change. Conclusions: The incidence of awareness during surgery in children is approximatelyeight times that measured in adults by postoperative recall.In contrast to adults, there is no evidence for preserved memorypriming during anaesthesia.     

Wachzustände während Allgemeinanästhesie Definition,Häufigkeit,klinische Relevanz,Ursachen, Vermeidung und medikolegale Aspekte

The possibility that a patient during general anaesthesia is aware of the operation going on and aware of severe pain that might be remembered postoperatively must be very alarming to patients and anaesthetists alike. Furthermore, there is experimental evidence showing that conscious recall of intraoperative events is only the tip of an iceberg; it seems very probable that there is even a higher incidence of unconscious perception during general anaesthesia. Therefore, the following stages of intraoperative awareness must be distinguished: (1) conscious awareness with explicit recall and with severe pain; (2) conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pain; (3) conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (4) subconscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (5) no awareness. The incidence of conscious awareness with explicit recall and severe pain has been estimated at less frequent than 1/3000 general anaesthetics. Conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pain has been reported in the literature with an incidence of 0.5–2%. With 7–72%, conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall shows a very wide range of variation and its occurrence probably depends on the anaesthetic drugs used. Subconscious awareness with possible implicit recall has an incidence of up to 80%, but there are many methodological problems in demonstrating implicit memory of intraoperative events. Reports of intraoperative awareness do not come exclusively from cardiac surgery and obstetrics, but also from all other operative specialities. Postoperatively, patients who experienced intraoperative awareness may develop a so-called post-traumatic stress syndrome. Symptoms involve re-experiencing the event awake or in dreams, sleep disturbances, depression, avoidance of stimuli associated with the event. The probability of the development of the post-traumatic stress syndrome seems to coincide with the experience of severe pain. When a patient complains of intraoperative awareness postoperatively the anaesthesiologist should discuss the event frankly with the patient. When the symptoms of the post-traumatic stress syndrome persist a psychotherapy should follow. Causes for intraoperative awareness may be: equipment failure, too-light anaesthesia, e.g. for a caesarean section or for emergency surgery in severely injured or polytraumatized patients, during cardiac surgery, bronchoscopy or difficult intubation. There is interindividual variability in anaesthetic effect; for example, chronic drug or alcohol abuse or overweight may make increased anaesthetic doses necessary. They are at risk for intraoperative awareness. Some general anaesthetics or anaesthetic procedures, e.g. the combination of a relaxant and N₂O, opioid mono-anaesthetics, or opioids combined with benzodiazepines, seem to involve a higher risk of intraoperative awareness than do volatile anaesthetics. The bases of litigation are medical malpractice, breach of contract by the anaesthesiologist or lack of informed consent from the patient. Therefore, patients who are at risk of intraoperative awareness should be given detailed information on this special risk before the operation.     

小儿麻醉的术中知晓

迄今,针对小儿术中知晓所做的研究为数不多,但其发生率较成人为高,而导致小儿术中知晓高发的原因尚不明确.为了提高小儿术中知晓检出的准确性,应对Brice访视模式进行调整和改进以适应小儿的认知发育水平.对知晓患儿的精神心理方面的研究尚待深入,但就现有的研究结果来看.大多数患儿并未因此而出现精神心理障碍.目前已有的脑电监测技术是否能有效地降低小儿术中知晓的发生率尚需求索.因此,针对小儿术中知晓的大样本多中心研究势在必行.     

Comparison of a new composite index based on midlatency auditory evoked potentials and electroencephalographic parameters with bispectral index (BIS) during moderate propofol sedation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Derived parameters of the electroencephalogram and auditory evoked potentials can be used to determine depth of anaesthesia and sedation. However, it is not known whether any parameter can identify the occurrence of awareness in individual patients. We have compared the performance of bispectral index and a new composite index derived from auditory evoked potentials and the electroencephalogram (AAI 1.61) in predicting consciousness, explicit and implicit memory during moderate sedation with propofol. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with spinal anaesthesia received intraoperatively propofol at the age-corrected C(50) for loss of consciousness and were presented test words via headphones. Bispectral index and AAI 1.61 (auditory evoked potentials, AEP-Monitor2) were recorded in parallel as well as the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation-score. Postoperatively, testing for explicit and implicit memory formation was performed. RESULTS: Bispectral index and AAI 1.61 correlated well with loss of consciousness defined by an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation-score of 2 (identical P(K) of 0.87), but did not allow a prediction of postoperative explicit or implicit recall. CONCLUSIONS: Both bispectral index and AAI may be indices of depth of sedation rather than indicators of memory formation, which persists during propofol sedation even after loss of consciousness.     

Absence of explicit and implicit memory in unconscious patients using a TCI of propofol

BACKGROUND: Episodes of implicit memory have been described during propofol anaesthesia. It remains unclear whether implicit memory is caused by short periods of awareness or occurs in an unconscious subject. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized in an experimental group (EG), a control group (CG) and a reference group (RG). Loss of consciousness (LOC) was obtained by progressive stepwise increases of propofol using a target-controlled infusion device (Diprifusor, Alaris Medical Systems, San Diego, CA). A tape containing 20 words was played to the patients in the CG before the start of anaesthesia and to the patients in the EG at a constant calculated concentration of propofol associated with LOC. The tape was not played to the patients in the RG. Three memory tests were performed postoperatively. RESULTS: Explicit and implicit memories were evidenced in the CG but not in the EG. CONCLUSION: In our group of young ASA I/II patients, in the absence of any noxious stimulus, no implicit or explicit memory was found when the calculated concentration of propofol using a Diprifusor was maintained at the level associated with LOC.     

Auditory evoked responses and learning and awareness during general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: There is a major distinction between conscious and unconscious learning. Monitoring the mid-latency auditory evoked responses (AER) has been proposed as a measure to ascertain the adequacy of the hypnotic state during surgery. In the present study, we investigated the presence of explicit and implicit memories after anesthesia and examined the relationships of such memories to the AER. METHODS: We studied 180 patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures. After a thiopental induction, one of four anesthetics were studied: Opioid bolus: 7.5 microg x kg(-1) fentanyl, 70% N2O, with 2.5 microg x kg(-1) supplements as needed (n=100); Opioid infusion: Alfentanil 50 microg x kg(-1) bolus, 1-1.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion, 70% N2O (n=40); Isoflurane 0.3%: Fentanyl 1 microg x kg(-1), 70% N2O, isoflurane 0.3% expired (n=16); Isoflurane 0.7%: Fentanyl 1 microg x kg(-1), 70% N2O, isoflurane 0.7% expired (n=23). AER were recorded before anesthesia, 5 min after surgical incision and then every 30 min until the end of surgery. A tape of either the story of the "Three Little Pigs" or the "Wizard of Oz" was played continuously between the recordings. Explicit memory was assessed postoperatively by tests of recall and recognition, and implicit memory was assessed by the frequency of story-related free associations to target words from the stories, which were solicited twice during a structured interview. RESULTS: Six patients showed explicit recall of intraoperative events: All received the opioid bolus regimen. About 7% of patients reported dreaming during anesthesia. The incidence of picking the correct story that had been presented during anesthesia averaged 49%, i.e., very close to chance level. Overall, priming occurred only at the second association tests for the opioid bolus regimen, for which the frequency of an association to the presented story among those not giving an association to the control story was 26%, which was double the frequency (13%) of an association to the control story among those not giving an association to the presented story. This was significant by McNemar's test, P=0.02. There were significant associations between awareness, priming and AER, e.g., recall was associated with higher Nb amplitudes during anesthesia and priming was associated with shorter wave latencies. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of awareness in patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and bolus supplementation was 6%. Thus, this anesthetic technique did not reduce the risk of awareness compared with the use of nitrous oxide alone. Implicit memory occurred during nitrous oxide and bolus supplementation. Recording AER during anesthesia may help to predict awareness and implicit memory, particularly the former. The short contents of most of the dreams which were recalled could hamper future studies in this area.     

A-line autoregression index monitoring to titrate inhalational anaesthesia: effects on sevoflurane consumption, emergence time and memory

BACKGROUND: A-line autoregression index (AAI) is a parameter derived from auditory evoked potentials proposed as depth of anaesthesia monitor. We evaluated the effects of AAI guidance on sevoflurane consumption, emergence time, explicit and implicit memory. METHODS: One hundred patients submitted to major abdominal surgery were randomized into two groups. In group A (n = 50), sevoflurane was titrated according to AAI (target = 20 +/- 5), in group B (n = 50) according to clinical signs. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol, atracurium and maintained with sevoflurane. The mean value of sevoflurane consumption (g/min) and emergence time has been assessed in both groups. After emergence, A test of explicit memory was administered. We assessed implicit memory using a category generation test. RESULTS: In group A, mean sevoflurane consumption was significantly (P = 0.0001) reduced by 20.4% and mean emergence time was significantly (P = 0.00012) shorter by 2 min with respect to group B. No patients experienced explicit memory while the difference between the two groups in implicit memory results was not significant (P = 0107). CONCLUSIONS: AAI titration of anaesthesia allows a significant reduction in sevoflurane consumption and emergence time without significant effects on the incidence of explicit and implicit memory. Nevertheless the relationship between AAI and memory requires studies in larger groups of patients.     

Intraoperative Awareness in Fast-track Cardiac Anesthesia

Background: Fast-track cardiac anesthesia, using low-dose narcotics combined with short-acting anesthetic and sedative agents, facilitates early tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery. The incidence of awareness with this anesthetic technique has not been investigated previously. The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the incidence of intraoperative awareness with explicit memory of events during fast-track cardiac anesthesia.

Methods: Data were collected prospectively over a 4-month period from 617 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a university hospital. All patients received a fast-track cardiac anesthetic regimen. Patients underwent a structured interview by a research nurse 18 h after extubation. A standard set of questions was asked during this interview to determine if the patient had explicit memory of any event from induction of anesthesia to recovery of consciousness.

Results: Nine patients did not complete a postoperative interview because of death (n = 7) or postoperative confusion (n = 2). The last memory before surgery reported in 420 (69.1%) patients was waiting in the holding area at the operating suite, and in the remaining 188 (30.9%) patients it was lying on the operating Table beforeinduction of anesthesia. Two patients (0.3%) had explicit memory of intraoperative events. One of the two patients also had explicit memory of pain. Neither patient reported adverse psychological sequelae.     

Monitoring intraoperativer Wachzustände Vegetative Zeichen,isolierte Unterarmtechnik,Elektroenzephalogramm und akustisch evozierte Potentiale

Several methods have been developed to quantify central anaesthetic effects and monitor awareness during general anaesthesia. The most important of these are the PRST score, calculated from changes in blood pressure, heart rate, sweating, and tear production, the isolated forearm technique, where the patient is allowed to move during surgery, the processed electroencephalogram (EEG) and the derived parameters median frequency (MF) and spectral-edge frequency (SEF), and midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). In clinical practice, the application of individual doses of anaesthetics is generally guided by autonomic vegetative clinical signs such as changes in blood pressure, heart rate, sweating, and tear production, quantified as the PRST score. Unfortunately, these parameters are not very reliable with regard to predicting the suppression of consciousness and awareness, especially when high-dose opioids are used in patients with cardiovascular medications and a variety of accompanying diseases. The PRST score probably indicates mainly the autonomic responses to painful stimuli, and seems to be useful in guiding the individual use of analgesics. The isolated forearm technique is a useful test of the patient's responsiveness during general anaesthesia, and thus an instrument for investigating the incidence of awareness during different anaesthetic regimens and when muscle relaxants are imployed. A disadvantage is that it can only be used for 20 to 30 min because of pressure-induced nerve blocks or lesions. It can not be employed when long-term relaxation is necessary and consciousness and awareness are to be monitored continuously. The processed EEG and the derived parameters MF and SEF are important scientific tools to quantify central effects of many anaesthetics and opioid analgesics that allow the development of pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic models of anaesthetic action. MF has proven to be useful in monitoring closed-loop feedback of intravenous drug administration. Unfortunately, until now there have been no clinical studies that document the usefulness of MF or SEF with regard to predicting intraoperative arousal or awareness. To the contrary, some experimental data failed to predict imminent arousal and response to surgical incision or verbal commands by MF or SEF. Therefore, the EEG seems to be of limited value for monitoring awareness, consciousness, or memory formation during anaesthesia. MLAEP are suppressed in a dose-dependent fashion by many general anaesthetics and correlate with wakefulness, awareness, and explicit and implicit memory during anaesthesia and seem to be a promising method of monitoring awareness during anaesthesia. Nevertheless, future studies will have to determine threshold values for the different MLAEP parameters for intraoperative awareness and explicit and implicit recall of intraoperatively presented information for the different commonly used anaesthetics. Only then will it be possible to determine the usefulness of the method in clinical practice.     

Monitoring consciousness in the pediatric patient: not just a small adult

Intraoperative awareness, defined as postoperative memory for intraoperative events, is believed to occur about 0.2% of the time in a general adult surgical population. A recent large-scale prospective study from a single institution revealed a strikingly high incidence (0.8%) of intraoperative awareness in children aged 5-12 years although the sequelae of awareness during surgery in children were reported to be relatively minor. This contrasts with awareness in adult patients, for whom this complication often causes psychological trauma, thus having medico-legal implications. Various monitors to detect intraoperative awareness have been used with varying success in adults. To date, however, no monitor has been shown to be effective in detecting intraoperative awareness during surgery in pediatric patients. Further research is required to clarify the rates of intraoperative awareness in the pediatric population as well as the need for monitoring this event during the clinical practice of pediatric anesthesiology.     

Awareness: a problem in paediatric anaesthesia?

Intraoperative awareness has been reported to occur in 0.8-5.0% of paediatric patients undergoing anaesthesia and, therefore, seems to be more common than in adults (incidence 0.1-0.2%). In adult patients, the consequences of intraoperative awareness are well known and can be severe, in children, however, they have not yet been adequately studied. The causes for intraoperative awareness can be divided into three broad categories: First, no or only a light anaesthetic is given on purpose, second, an insufficient dose of an anaesthetic is given inadvertently, third, there is equipment malfunction or the anaesthesiologist makes an error. Unfortunately, especially in young children, painful interventions are still performed without adequate analgesia, e.g. awake intubation or fracture manipulation under midazolam sedation alone. The key issue is, however, that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics change enormously from the 500 g preterm baby to the adolescent patient. Adequate dosing is much more difficult in paediatric patients compared to standard adult surgical patients. Solid knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of commonly used drugs in different paediatric age groups, as well as aiming for perfection in daily care will help to reduce the incidence of awareness. Methods for monitoring the depth of hypnosis, e.g. the bispectral index, will be used increasingly, at least in children above 1 year of age. In addition to clinical parameters, they will hopefully help to further reduce the incidence of intraoperative awareness.     

Unerwünschte Wachheit

Intraoperative awareness has been reported to occur in 0.8–5.0% of paediatric patients undergoing anaesthesia and, therefore, seems to be more common than in adults (incidence 0.1–0.2%). In adult patients, the consequences of intraoperative awareness are well known and can be severe, in children, however, they have not yet been adequately studied. The causes for intraoperative awareness can be divided into three broad categories: First, no or only a light anaesthetic is given on purpose, second, an insufficient dose of an anaesthetic is given inadvertently, third, there is equipment malfunction or the anaesthesiologist makes an error. Unfortunately, especially in young children, painful interventions are still performed without adequate analgesia, e.g. awake intubation or fracture manipulation under midazolam sedation alone. The key issue is, however, that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics change enormously from the 500 g preterm baby to the adolescent patient. Adequate dosing is much more difficult in paediatric patients compared to standard adult surgical patients. Solid knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of commonly used drugs in different paediatric age groups, as well as aiming for perfection in daily care will help to reduce the incidence of awareness. Methods for monitoring the depth of hypnosis, e.g. the bispectral index, will be used increasingly, at least in children above 1 year of age. In addition to clinical parameters, they will hopefully help to further reduce the incidence of intraoperative awareness.     

Medial temporal lobe involvement in an implicit memory task: evidence of collaborating implicit and explicit memory systems from FMRI and Alzheimer's disease

We used a prototype extraction task to assess implicit learning of a meaningful novel visual category. Cortical activation was monitored in young adults with functional magnetic resonance imaging. We observed occipital deactivation at test consistent with perceptually based implicit learning, and lateral temporal cortex deactivation reflecting implicit acquisition of the category's semantic nature. Medial temporal lobe (MTL) activation during exposure and test suggested involvement of explicit memory as well. Behavioral performance of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and healthy seniors was also assessed, and AD performance was correlated with gray matter volume using voxel-based morphometry. AD patients showed learning, consistent with preserved implicit memory, and confirming that AD patients' implicit memory is not limited to abstract patterns. However, patients were somewhat impaired relative to healthy seniors. Occipital and lateral temporal cortical volume correlated with successful AD patient performance, and thus overlapped with young adults' areas of deactivation. Patients' severe MTL atrophy precluded involvement of this region. AD patients thus appear to engage a cortically based implicit memory mechanism, whereas their relative deficit on this task may reflect their MTL disease. These findings suggest that implicit and explicit memory systems collaborate in neurologically intact individuals performing an ostensibly implicit memory task.     

No sex differences in memory formation during general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Women respond differently to anesthesia than men, initially recovering more rapidly, but having more postoperative morbidity. Studies on surgical patients report evidence of memory formation during anesthesia. However, sex differences in memory formation have not been explored. Therefore, the authors investigated sex differences in the implicit and explicit memory formation during general anesthesia. METHODS: With ethics committee approval, 120 consenting adult patients scheduled to undergo surgery during general anesthesia were recruited. Intraoperatively, 16 target words were presented to patients via headphones, and the Bispectral Index was recorded. Postoperatively, memory for presented words was tested using a word stem completion test. The test was divided into inclusion and exclusion parts, to delineate implicit and explicit memory contributions. RESULTS: Target and distracter hit rates were similar in men and women. For the whole study group, there was a significant difference between inclusion target hit rate (0.42) and base hit rate (0.39) (P = 0.01). Buchner's model suggested that this memory formation was attributable to both implicit and explicit memory. A Bispectral Index value greater than 50 was the only significant predictor of inclusion target hit rate. None of the patients were able to consciously recall the words presented during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients showed greater memory performance for words presented during general anesthesia than for words not presented. However, sex differences in memory formation were not observed. A relation between hypnotic state and memory during sevoflurane anesthesia was also established, suggesting that memory formation is possible even at hypnotic depths considered to be adequate anesthesia.     

No Sex Differences in Memory Formation during General Anesthesia

Background: Women respond differently to anesthesia than men, initially recovering more rapidly, but having more postoperative morbidity. Studies on surgical patients report evidence of memory formation during anesthesia. However, sex differences in memory formation have not been explored. Therefore, the authors investigated sex differences in the implicit and explicit memory formation during general anesthesia.

Methods: With ethics committee approval, 120 consenting adult patients scheduled to undergo surgery during general anesthesia were recruited. Intraoperatively, 16 target words were presented to patients via headphones, and the Bispectral Index was recorded. Postoperatively, memory for presented words was tested using a word stem completion test. The test was divided into inclusion and exclusion parts, to delineate implicit and explicit memory contributions.

Results: Target and distracter hit rates were similar in men and women. For the whole study group, there was a significant difference between inclusion target hit rate (0.42) and base hit rate (0.39) (P = 0.01). Buchner's model suggested that this memory formation was attributable to both implicit and explicit memory. A Bispectral Index value greater than 50 was the only significant predictor of inclusion target hit rate. None of the patients were able to consciously recall the words presented during surgery.     

Awareness during anesthesia in children: a prospective cohort study

During routine adult anesthesia, the risk of awareness is 0.1%-0.2%. No recent studies have reported the incidence in children. Altered pharmacology and differing anesthesia techniques suggest that the incidence may differ in children. In this prospective cohort study, we determined the incidence of awareness during anesthesia in children. Eight-hundred-sixty-four children aged 5-12 yr who had undergone general anesthesia at The Royal Children's Hospital were interviewed on 3 occasions to determine the incidence of awareness. The awareness assessment was nested within a larger study of behavior change after anesthesia. Reports of suspected awareness were sent to four independent adjudicators. If they all agreed, a case was classified as true awareness. Twenty-eight reports were generated. There were 7 cases of true awareness, for an incidence of 0.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.3%-1.7%). Only one aware child received neuromuscular blockers, compared with 12% in the nonaware group. No aware child reported distress, and no substantial difference was detected in behavior disturbance between aware (20%) and nonaware (16%) children. The data provide some evidence that, like adults, children are also at risk of intraoperative awareness. Although the cause remains unclear, anesthesiologists should be alerted to the possibility of awareness in children.     

Postoperative reading speed does not indicate implicit memory in elderly cardiac patients after propofol and remifentanyl anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: A recent study in young patients undergoing propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia demonstrated implicit memory for stories presented during operation using a postoperative reading speed task. In this study we investigated whether patients who tolerate only small amounts of anaesthetics are prone to develop implicit and explicit memories about intraoperative events. METHODS: Thirty patients with poor physical status (ASA III-IV) undergoing cardioverter defibrillator implantation were included in the study. Patients were premedicated with intravenous midazolam and anaesthesia was maintained using propofol and remifentanil infusions. During surgery one of two audio-tapes containing two short stories was played to the patients. Reading speed for the stories played during surgery and two similar stories from the other tape was tested 4 h later. Explicit memory was tested at 4 h and 24 h after audiotape presentation using a structured interview and a forced-choice recognition test pertaining to the story content. Thirty additional awake subjects served as controls. RESULTS: Although half of the patients seemed to be awake one or more times during the operation, no explicit memories of intraoperative events were reported. The forced-choice recognition of the stories was at chance level. No effect on reading speed was found in either the patients or the control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The possible reasons for reduced explicit and implicit memory performance in elderly patients are age and poor physical status of the patients and the modality change between study and test phases. A non-anaesthetised control group of the same age and physical status should therefore be included in all studies of implicit memory.     

Propofol and memory: a study using a process dissociation procedure and functional magnetic resonance imaging

Thirty volunteers randomly received either mild or deep propofol sedation, to assess its effect on explicit and implicit memory. Blood oxygen level‐dependent functional magnetic resonance during sedation examined brain activation by auditory word stimulus and a process dissociation procedure was performed 4 h after scanning. Explicit memory formation did not occur in either group. Implicit memories were formed during mild but not deep sedation (p = 0.04). Mild propofol sedation inhibited superior temporal gyrus activation (Z value 4.37, voxel 167). Deep propofol sedation inhibited superior temporal gyrus (Z value 4.25, voxel 351), middle temporal gyrus (Z value 4.39, voxel 351) and inferior parietal lobule (Z value 5.06, voxel 239) activation. Propofol only abolishes implicit memory during deep sedation. The superior temporal gyrus is associated with explicit memory processing, while the formation of both implicit and explicit memories is associated with superior and middle temporal gyri and inferior parietal lobule activation.