Intraaortic balloon pumping in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Beneficial effect of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) treatment in high-risk patients who had open heart surgery have been demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative IABP use on survival in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients having CABG at our institution were reviewed. Patients having an IABP were identified retrospectively and grouped into one of 3 groups as follows. Group A (n = 14): preoperative IABP for high-risk urgent or elective cases. Group B (n = 26): preoperative IABP for emergency cases. Group C (n = 6): unplanned intraoperative or postoperative IABP. RESULTS: Forty-six patients had an IABP (16.6% of total). Parsonnet score in group B was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Length of operation for group C was significantly longer (p < 0.05). Overall hospital mortality in the total group of 277 cases was 4.2%. Hospital mortality was 7.1% in group A, 7.7% in group B, and 50% in group C. Hospital mortality in group C was significantly higher (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative treatment with IABP in high-risk patients undergoing CABG was confirmed. This approach resulted in a significantly lower hospital mortality.     

Aggressive preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The use of the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting has been traditionally associated with a high complication rate and adverse outcomes. However, recent reports show that many of these catastrophic outcomes can be avoided by preoperatively placing the IABP in high-risk patients. To further validate these reports, we defined a set of liberal criteria for preoperative IABP insertion and applied them to a series of elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Two hundred six consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were retrospectively reviewed. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, an anesthetic protocol for early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, and aggressive diuresis was applied to all patients. Patients who required an urgent operation because of failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, a critical left main stenosis (70% or greater), pronounced left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less), or unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or who required an emergency reoperation received preoperative IABP support. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate for the entire group was 4.4%. There were 97 patients (47%) who received a preoperative IABP (group II) in comparison with 109 patients (53%) who did not fulfill the preoperative insertion criteria (group I). Patients in group II had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 46% versus 59%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (35% versus 17%, p<0.01) and acute myocardial infarction (37% versus 17%, p<0.01) than patients in group I. The average postoperative hospital length of stay for patients in group II was slightly longer than for those in group I (9.0+/-10.5 versus 6.0+/-3.7 days, p<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in complication or mortality rates between the two groups. Only 2 patients (2.2%) had complications related to IABP insertion. Lower extremity ischemia occurred in both patients, and both were treated successfully with thromboembolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Liberal preoperative insertion of the IABP can be performed safely in high-risk elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with results comparable to those in lower risk patients.     

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) placement in high-risk patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery (CABG). The primary outcome was hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were IABP-related complications (bleeding, leg ischemia, aortic dissection). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane registry of Controlled Trials, and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies that fulfilled our a priori inclusion criteria. Eligibility decisions, relevance, study validity, and data extraction were performed in duplicate using pre-specified criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. RESULTS: Ten publications fulfilled our eligibility criteria, of which four were RCTs and six were cohort studies with controls. There were statistical as well as clinical heterogeneity among included studies. A total of 1034 patients received preoperative IABP and 1329 did not receive preoperative IABP. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for hospital mortality in patients treated with preoperative IABP was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.21-0.82, p = 0.01). The number needed to treat was 17. The pooled OR for hospital mortality from randomized trials was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.06-0.57, p = 0.003) and from cohort studies was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.24-1.2, p = 0.13). Overall, 3.7% (13 of 349) of patients who received preoperative IABP developed either limb ischemia or haematoma at the IABP insertion site, and most of these complications improved after discontinuation of IABP. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this meta-analysis support the use of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients to reduce hospital mortality.     

Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

The beneficial effects of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have been reported. However, the benefits of insertion of IABP electively in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) have not been established. Six hundred and twenty-five patients who underwent OPCAB form the study group. High-risk patients fulfilling two or more of the following: left main stem stenosis >70%, unstable angina, and poor left ventricular function, who had elective insertion of IABP preoperatively by the open technique (group I; n = 20) were compared with a similar high-risk group that did not (group II; n = 25). There were no significant differences in risk factors between the two groups (Euroscore 5.68). The mean number of grafts was similar. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the need for inotropes, duration of ventilation, arrhythmias, cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, and infective complications (p = NS). There were no IABP-related complications. Acute renal failure requiring hemofiltration was higher in group II (n = 5; p < 0.05). Four patients (16%) in group II required postoperative IABP. Although intensive care stay was longer in group I (27.6 +/- 15.3 vs. 18.6 +/- 9.1 hours; p < 0.05), patients in group I were discharged earlier from hospital. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups (n = 1 in each group). In high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB, routine preoperative insertion of IABP electively reduces the incidence of acute renal failure. In addition it avoids the need for emergency insertion postoperatively and may result in earlier discharge.     

Evaluation of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump support in high risk coronary patients

Objective: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an established additional support to pharmacological treatment of the failing heart after myocardial infarction, unstable angina and cardiac surgery. The effect of preoperative IABP in high risk patients was evaluated. Methods: Between June 1994 and March 1996 all high risk patients for CABG (two or more of these criteria: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, left main stem stenosis ≥70%, REDO-CABG, unstable angina) were randomized into either of 3 groups: (1) IABP 1 day prior to surgery, (2) IABP 1–2 h prior to CPB and (3) no preoperative IABP, controls. Exclusion criteria: cardiogenic shock preoperatively. Fifty-two patients have entered the study—group 1 (13 patients), group 2 (19 patients) and group 3 (20 patients). Preoperative patient characteristics and operative data revealed no group differences. There were 56% REDO's, unstable angina 59%, LVEF≤40%, 87% (34.0±11.6%) and left main stem stenosis in 35%. Results: The CPB-time was shorter in groups 1 and 2 88.7±20.3 min than in group 3 105.5±26.8 min, P<0.001, while ischemia time did not differ. Hospital mortality was higher in group 3, 25% vs. 6% (groups 1 and 2). Postoperative low cardiac output was seen in 12 patients (60%) in group 3 vs. 6 patients (19%) in groups 1 and 2, P<0.05. Cardiac index increased significantly prior to CPB in groups 1 and 2. After CPB cardiac index was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3 and continued to increase. The IABP was removed after 3.1±1.0 days in group 3 vs. 1.3±0.6 days in groups 1 and 2, P<0.001. In group 3, 11 patients required IABP postoperatively compared to only 4 patients in groups 1 and 2. ICU stay was shorter in groups 1 and 2—2.3±0.9 days vs. 3.5±1.1 days for group 3, P=0.004. All patients received dopamin postoperatively, however in a lower dose in groups 1 and 2, 4.5 vs. 13.5 μg/kg/min. Dobutamine was added in 23% of the patients (group 1), 32% (group 2) and 95% (group 3). Adrenalin/amrinonum was required in 40% of the patients in group 3, 5% in group 2 and none in group 1. Group 1 patients had a better improvement of cardiac performance than group 2, while other parameters did not differ. Three months follow up of hospital survivors showed no group differences. Conclusions: The use of preoperative IABP in high risk patients lowers hospital mortality and shortens the stay in ICU, due to improved cardiac performance, compared to a controls. The procedure was cost-beneficial. One day preoperative IABP treatment improves cardiac performance more than 1–2 h preoperative IABP treatment, but does not significantly affect the outcome in terms of hospital mortality or postoperative morbidity.     

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy in Severe Postcardiotomy Dysfunction: A Prospective Randomized Study

Abstract Background: Occurrence of severe postcardiotomy dysfunction requiring prolonged postoperative support with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) and inotropes, complicating surgery for coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease carries important hospital morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the impact of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril) therapy in these patients in the early postoperative period. Methods: During a 5-year period, 298 patients with prolonged diminished cardiac output required support (> 48 to 72 hours) with IABP plus two or three inotropes. This cohort was randomized to two groups, group A (195 patients) who were continued on IABP and inotropes alone and group B (103 patients) who were given an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril 48 to 72 hours postoperatively and continued on IABP and inotropes. Results: Tissue perfusion and he-modynamic parameters improved (p < 0.0001) in group B with early termination of IABP (duration of support mean 86 hours in group B vs 169 hours in group A) and inotropes. Peak improvement in tissue perfusion and hemodynamic parameters correlated with decreased serum angiotensin converting enzyme levels. Hospital mortality occurred in 31% of patients in group A and 14.5% in group B. Morbidity complications developed in 37% of patients in group A and 20% in group B. The average length of hospital stay in group A was 27 days and 17 days in group B. Cardiac, pulmonary, infective, gastrointestinal, renal, and neurological complications were common in both groups. Conclusion: Administration of ACE inhibitors in the early postoperative period to patients with severe postcardiotomy dysfunction caused improvement in tissue perfusion with decreases in mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. These drugs, by effectively limiting physiological effects induced by renin angiotensin-aldosterone axis and other mechanisms, caused recovery of stunned myocardium. More randomized trials are needed before recommending these drugs for routine use in similar patients. (J Card Surg 1998;13;11–17)     

Optimal timing of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump support in high-risk coronary patients.

BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment, on outcome and cost, in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting have been demonstrated. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to determine the optimal timing for preoperative IABP support in a cohort of high-risk patients. METHODS: Sixty consecutive high-risk patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (presenting with two or more of the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30, unstable angina, reoperation, or left main stenosis greater than 70%) entered the study. Thirty patients did not receive preoperative IABP (controls), 30 patients had preoperative IABP therapy starting 2 hours (T2), 12 hours (T12), or 24 hours (T24), by random assignment, before the operation. Fifty patients had preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction mean, less than 0.30 (less than 0.26+/-0.08), (n = 40) unstable angina, 28% (n = 17) left main stenosis, and 32% (n = 19) were reoperations. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass was shorter in the IABP groups. There was one death in the IABP group and six in the control group. The complication rate for IABP was 8.3% (n = 5) without group differences. Cardiac index was significantly higher postoperatively (p<0.001) in patients with preoperative IABP treatment compared with controls. There were no significant differences between the three IABP subgroups at any time. The incidence of postoperative low cardiac output was significantly lower in the IABP groups (p<0.001). Intubation time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital was shorter in the IABP groups (p = 0.211, p<0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no differences between the IABP subgroups in any of the studied variables. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients who have coronary artery bypass grafting was confirmed. There were no differences in outcome between the subgroups; therefore, at 2 hours preoperatively, IABP therapy can be started.     

术前置入主动脉内球囊反搏对高危冠状动脉旁路移植术患者预后的影响

目的比较高危冠心病患者术前预防性置入主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)和被动紧急置入IABP对临床预后的影响. 方法 35例接受冠状动脉旁路移植手术同时需接受IABP置入的患者,根据置入的时机不同分为两组.术前置入组 接受术前预防性置入IABP;对照组术中或术后接受紧急置入IABP.比较两组围术期死亡率、心肌梗死发生率、术后心功能不全和需要正性肌力药物辅助的程度、IABP使用的时间、术后呼吸机辅助时间和重症监护治疗病房(ICU)停留时间. 结果术前置入组围手术期死亡率和心肌梗死发生率分别为11.1%和0%,较对照组低(65.4%,50%;P＝0.007,0.013);两组呼吸机辅助通气时间、IABP使用时间、术后需正性肌力药物辅助时间以及术后平均住ICU时间差别均有显著性意义(P＜0.05). 结论术前预防性置入IABP能降低围术期死亡率、心肌梗死发生率,减少对正性肌力药物的需要量和缩短住ICU时间.     

Effective surgical management of high-risk coronary patients using preoperative intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation therapy.

The proportion of high-risk coronary patients submitted to surgical myocardial revascularization (CABG) is steadily increasing. High-risk patients utilize more hospital resources and have a higher procedural cost than low-moderate risk CABG patients. An efficient management is essential to improve outcome and reduce costs. This report entails three study periods. In an initial retrospective study coronary high-risk criteria were established. At least two of the following factors were required: redo CABG, unstable angina, left main stem stenosis greater than 70%, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.30 and diffuse coronary artery disease. Poor preoperative cardiac performance was the major contributing factor for poor outcome. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation therapy (IABP) was introduced as preoperative therapy. During a second study period prospective randomized studies found preoperative IABP-therapy efficient, significantly improving both preoperative cardiac index (P < 0.0001), decreasing postoperative mortality (P < 0.0001) and morbidity, shorten intensive care unit stay as well as total hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Drug consumption was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). Optimal timing was found to be 2 h prior to aortic cross-clamping and the therapy was found highly cost-beneficial with an average 36% reduction of the total procedural cost. During a third study period, well beyond any study protocol period, preoperative IABP therapy was again found highly effective with a close to 100% utilization rate in high-risk patients and continuous efficacy with excellent outcome, despite acceptance of sicker patients. During this post-study evaluation period 1/3 of the high-risk patients presented with 4 of the established risk factors.The use of preoperative IABP therapy is therefore highly recommended for high-risk coronary patients undergoing CABG.     

抗菌药物不同使用时间对预防剖宫产术后感染的影响

目的观察抗菌药物不同使用时间对预防剖宫产术后感染的影响。 方法选择2012年2月至2014年10月243例剖宫产产妇为研究对象,根据入院顺序随机分为A组、B组和C组,每组各81例。Ａ组产妇在术前30 min静脉滴注抗菌药物,术后不再使用抗菌药物;Ｂ组产妇术前30 min和术后3 d连续静脉滴注抗菌药物;C组产妇仅在术后连续静脉滴注3 d抗菌药物。 结果手术情况：A、B组产妇术后住院时间和住院费用均显著低于C组（t = 13.603、27.024、13.367、7.939,P = 0.000、0.000、0.000、0.008）,A组患者住院费用显著低于B组（t = 18.019、P = 0.000）;生理指标与切口愈合：A、B组产妇术后3 d最高体温、WBC计数和CRP水平均显著低于C组（t = 27.322、1 333.269、21.327、16.484、119.541、17.689,P = 0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000）,A组产妇WBC、CRP水平显著低于B组（t = 16.037、4.557,P = 0.000、0.038）;术后感染：A、B两组患者术后感染率均显著低于C组（4.94% vs 6.17% vs 17.28%）（χ² = 4.830、6.250,P = 0.032、0.026）。 结论剖宫产术前30 min预防性使用抗菌药物能降低术后炎性反应及并发症发生率,促进切口愈合,缩短住院时间,节约住院费用,是一种较为理想的预防术后感染方式。     

Prevention of sternal dehiscence with the Sternum External Fixation (Stern-E-Fix) corset -- a randomized trial in 750 patients

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study will be to determine the effects of a new advanced sternum external fixation (Stern-E-Fix) corset on prevention of sternal instability and mediastinitis in high-risk patients. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study (January 2009 -- June 2011) comprised 750 male patients undergoing standard median sternotomy for cardiac procedures (78% CABG). Patients were divided in two randomized groups (A, n = 380: received a Stern-E-Fix corset postoperatively for 6 weeks and B, n = 370: control group received a standard elastic thorax bandage). In both groups, risk factors for sternal dehiscence and preoperative preparations were similar. RESULTS: Wound infections occurred in n = 13 (3.42%) pts. in group A vs. n = 35 (9.46%) in group B. In group A, only 1 patient presented with sternal dehiscence vs. 22 pts. in group B. In all 22 patients, sternal rewiring followed by antibiotic therapy was needed. Mediastinitis related mortality was none in A versus two in B. Treatment failure in group B was more than five times higher than in A (p = 0.01); the mean length of stay in hospital was 12.53 +/- 7.4 days (A) versus 17.9 +/- 15.1 days (B)(p = 0.02). Re-operation for sternal infection was 4 times higher in group B. Mean ventilation time was relatively longer in B (2.5 vs. 1.28 days) (p = 0.01). The mean follow-up period was 8 weeks (range 6 -- 12 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that using an external supportive sternal corset (Stern-E-Fix) yields a significantly better and effective prevention against development of sternal dehiscence and secondary sternal infection in high-risk poststernotomy patients.     

Trends in intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: comparison of a 669 record Australian dataset with the multinational Benchmark Counterpulsation Outcomes Registry

The aim of this study was to review and describe indications for intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) use and identify the impact these have on outcomes at an Australian cardiothoracic tertiary referral hospital. A secondary aim was comparison of the Australian practice with a large multinational IABP data registry. Patient demographics, IABP indication, IABP complication rate and mortality in 662 patients treated with IABP at The Prince Charles Hospital (TPCH), Brisbane, between January 1994 and December 2004 inclusive were compared with The Benchmark Counterpulsation Outcomes Registry. Data were collected between 1994 and 2000 by retrospective patient record review and prospectively using the Benchmark database from 2001 to 2004. Statistical analysis was undertaken using SAS (v8.2) software. The mean age of patients managed with IABP at TPCH (71.6% male) was 63.4 years (SD 12.4). In-hospital mortality rate was 22% and the complication rate was 10.3%. TPCH indications for IABP were: weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (34.2%); cardiogenic shock (24.4%); preoperative support (13%); catheter laboratory support (10.6%); refractory ventricular failure (7.3%); ischaemia related to intractable ventricular arrhythmias (4.5%); unstable refractory angina (4%); mechanical complications due to acute myocardial infarction (1.2%) and other (0.4%) (0.4% not reported). In comparison to Benchmark, IABP at TPCH demonstrated a prejudice toward intraoperative use (34.2% versus 16.6%; P < or = 0.0001) and an aversion to catheter laboratory support (10.6% versus 19%; P < or = 0.0001). TPCH and Benchmark IABP outcomes demonstrated comparable mortality (22% versus 20.8%; P = ns) but increased TPCH complications (10.3% vs. 6.2%; P < or = 0.0001) owing to a 2% difference in observed insertion site bleeding.     

Pre-operative balloon counterpulsation and off-pump coronary surgery for high-risk patients

Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) can be performed less invasively without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Multivessel off-pump CABG (OPCAB) is challenging in patients with critical left main stenosis (> 70%) and/or severe ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 0.35) Our objective was the evaluation of efficiency of intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) preoperatively in this high-risk group in order to perform OPCABG safely. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a consecutive 10-month period (out of 88 OPCABG patients) 23 high-risk patients were treated and were compared with 15 on-pump patients (out of 69) with the same criteria. RESULTS: Preoperative implantation of IABP was significantly higher in the OPCABG group (70% vs 46%, p < 0.05). No conversion to CPB was required in the OPCABG group. Post-operative angiography was systematically performed and demonstrated 97.5% patency of anastomosis. No device-related complications occurred. No difference was found concerning age, risk factors, emergency surgery, ejection fraction, mean number of grafts per patient (2.64 versus 2.75) and average operating time. In contrast, OPCABG demonstrated a trend toward reduced morbidity in terms of atrial fibrillation, reexploration for bleeding and prolonged ventilator requirement > 12 h. Mortality was less in the OPCABG group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: More randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the true efficacy of elective IABP in OPCABG high-risk patients. Until such studies are evaluated, and therefore because older and sicker patients now constitute a greater percentage of candidates for OPCABG, the timing of application of the IABP is warranted. These results may further justify preoperative use of the IABP in a large proportion of this group of patients.     

Use of an intraaortic balloon pump in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Prophylactic use of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) prior to open-heart surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function is still under debate. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% were therefore compared according to time of IABP placement, viz. preoperative (n = 56), intraoperative (n = 40) or postoperative (n = 17), and also with patients who did not receive mechanical support despite LVEF < 40% (n = 78). The main indication for preoperative IABP insertion was severely impaired left ventricular function (80%), while patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement mainly presented with low cardiac-output syndrome (70%/53%). Preoperative IABP was associated with a low mortality rate (8.9%), whereas patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement had a high mortality risk and an increased catecholamine requirement. Of the patients scheduled for surgery without prophylactic IABP, 19% required intra- or postoperative insertion. Prophylactic placement of IABP thus reduced the mortality rate as well as the postoperative need for mechanical and catecholamine support. Need for intraoperative IABP insertion was associated with high mortality, whereas the outcome after postoperative IABP placement depended on the indication for the measure.     

Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial.

Between October 1980 and December 1985, 471 patients with a resectable rectal carcinoma entered a randomized multicenter trial for comparison of pre- and postoperative irradiation. Two hundred thirty-six patients were allocated to receive high-dose fractionated preoperative irradiation (total dosage, 25.5 Gy in five to seven days) and 235 patients to receive postoperative irradiation to a very high dosage level with conventional fractionation (60 Gy in a total 8 weeks). The postoperative treatment was delivered only to a high-risk group of patients (Astler-Coller stages B2, C1, and C2). The preoperative irradiation was well tolerated, with no immediate irradiation-related complications and no increased postoperative mortality (3%, 7 of 217 patients, compared to 5%, 10 of 215 patients in the postoperatively irradiated group). More patients in the preoperative irradiation group had perineal wound sepsis after abdominoperineal resection and this prolonged the stay in hospital after surgery. In 50% of the patients the postoperative treatment could not be commenced until more than 6 weeks after surgery. The postoperative treatment was not as well tolerated as the preoperative one. The local recurrence rate was statistically significantly lower after preoperative than after postoperative radiotherapy (12% versus 21%; p = 0.02). In both groups more patients developed a local recurrence if the bowel was perforated at surgery or if the resection line was microscopically close to the tumor. To date, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years and a mean follow-up of 6 years, there is no difference in survival rates between the two groups.     

Variation in hospital rates of intraaortic balloon pump use in coronary artery bypass operations

BACKGROUND: Little is known about regional patterns of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) use in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations. Our objectives were (1) to identify clinical variables associated with IABP use, and (2) to examine risk-adjusted rates of IABP use for 12 Massachusetts hospitals performing CABG operations. METHODS: We used hospital discharge data to identify 6944 CABG surgical cases. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical variables associated with IABP use, and the resulting multivariate model was then used to risk adjust hospital rates of IABP use. RESULTS: The IABP was used in 13.4% of the CABG surgical cases. The clinical variables independently associated with IABP use were cardiogenic shock, same admission angioplasty, prior CABG operation, cardiac arrest, congestive heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, and urgent admission status. Risk-adjusted rates of IABP use varied widely across hospitals from 7.8% to 20.8% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital rates of IABP use vary considerably in Massachusetts. This practice variation may be related to the persistent uncertainty regarding the precise clinical indications for the IABP in this patient population.     

Prophylactic Use of Intra‐Aortic Balloon Pumps in Open Heart Surgery

During a 1‐year period, intra‐aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) were used in open heart surgery on 57 patients. Indications were prophylactic usage for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 52 patients, prophylactic usage for valve replacement in three patients, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) weaning during valve replacement in two patients. The 52 CABG patients comprised 94.5% of all CABG procedures during the period. Sheathless 8 Fr IABPs were used in all cases. The 57 patients using IABPs were analyzed. The mean duration of IABP use was 41.7 h. Morbidity was not associated with using IABPs. There was one case of balloon rupture. Hemostasis was performed easily after removing IABP catheters by compressing the groin for approximately 15 min. The lowest blood pressure during anastomosis or cardiac arrest was also assessed. The lowest peak pressure was 55.9 ± 17.3 mm Hg for patients with IABP still turned on, and the lowest mean pressure was 34.7 ± 6.5 mm Hg for patients with IABP temporarily turned off. Peak blood pressure after CPB was 73.8 ± 17.8 mm Hg. During open heart surgery under anesthesia with the low blood pressure presented by this series, use of IABPs enabled patients to tolerate the procedure. In conclusion, aggressive use of IABPs is easy, safe, and effective with no related morbidity.     

A critical assessment of outcomes in emergency versus nonemergency general surgery using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

Emergent operations are thought to carry higher morbidity and mortality than nonemergent cases. However, there is a lack of specific outcomes data for emergent general surgery procedures. The objective of our study was to assess and quantify postoperative morbidity and mortality for emergency versus nonemergency general surgery operations. All general surgery inpatients were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2008 database. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical metrics and occurrences were assessed. A total of 25,770 emergent and 98,867 nonemergent cases were identified. Postoperative morbidity was significantly worse in the emergent group, including ventilation more than 48 hours, bleeding requiring transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, renal failure, and need for reoperation. Overall, emergent cases had significantly more postoperative complications (22.8% vs 14.2%) and higher mortality rates (6.5% vs 1.4%). General surgery patients who undergo emergent operations have significantly poorer outcomes when compared with nonemergent patients; our analysis has quantified these differences. Emergent patients seem to manifest unique clinical, pathophysiologic, and inflammatory responses to their surgical disease. This data suggests that there is a need for improvement in both methods and systems of care for the emergent population.     

Expansion of PCI at the Expense of Bypass Surgery Jeopardizes Protection against Premature Death

Prophylactic use of an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) prior to open-heart surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function is still under debate. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &;lt; 40% were therefore compared according to time of IABP placement, viz. preoperative (n = 56), intraoperative (n = 40) or postoperative (n = 17), and also with patients who did not receive mechanical support despite LVEF &;lt; 40% (n = 78). The main indication for preoperative IABP insertion was severely impaired left ventricular function (80%), while patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement mainly presented with low cardiac-output syndrome (70%/53%). Preoperative IABP was associated with a low mortality rate (8.9%), whereas patients with intraoperative or postoperative IABP placement had a high mortality risk and an increased catecholamine requirement. Of the patients scheduled for surgery without prophylactic IABP, 19% required intra- or postoperative insertion. Prophylactic placement of IABP thus reduced the mortality rate as well as the postoperative need for mechanical and catecholamine support. Need for intraoperative IABP insertion was associated with high mortality, whereas the outcome after postoperative IABP placement depended on the indication for the measure.     

门静脉高压症并发上消化道出血的急诊手术治疗

目的 总结１９９１．８～１９９９．８共８年来我院１８例行急诊手术治疗的食管及胃底曲张静脉破裂大出血病例,以探讨适宜的手术适应证及手术方法。方法 将１８例病人归纳为急诊分流术治疗组（１１例）及急认充术治疗组（７组）。对比组病从的术前肝功能分级,手术前后门静脉压变化情况,手术死亡率,术后并发症发生率及手术止血率。结果 分流组术前肝功能分级为ＣｈｉｌｄＣ级者占６３．６％（７例）,断流术组为４３．９％（３