EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be difficult. Computed tomography (CT) is the standard, noninvasive imaging method for evaluation of suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but it has limited sensitivity for diagnosis, local staging, and metastases. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fluoro-deoxyglucose/positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are imaging methods that may improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with presumed resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were prospectively evaluated with helical CT, EUS, and FDG-PET. RESULTS: Sensitivity for the detection of pancreatic cancer was higher for EUS (93%) and FDG-PET (87%) than for CT (53%). EUS was more sensitive than CT for local vascular invasion of the portal and superior mesenteric veins. EUS diagnosis of vascular invasion was associated with poor outcome after surgery. EUS-guided, fine-needle aspiration allowed tissue diagnosis in 14 of 21 attempts (67%). FDG-PET diagnosed 7 of 9 cases of proven metastatic disease, 4 of which were missed by CT. Two of three metastatic liver lesions suspected by CT were indeterminate for metastases. FDG-PET confirmed metastases. CONCLUSIONS: EUS and PET improve diagnostic capability in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. EUS is useful in determining local vascular invasion and obtaining tissue diagnosis. FDG-PET is useful in identifying metastatic disease. Both techniques are more sensitive than helical CT for identification of the primary tumor. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:367-71).     

The importance of PET in the diagnosis and response evaluation of esophageal cancer

The major aims of imaging in esophageal cancer are to distinguish between locoregional and systemic disease (M-stage), to determine local tumor extension (T- and N-stage), to assess response to chemo- or chemoradiotherapy and to identify recurrence of cancer. The sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) for detection of distant metastases ranges between < 50% and > 90%. In esophageal cancer, F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been shown to detect metastatic disease in approximately 20% of patients who are considered as having only locoregional disease on CT. In locoregional pretherapeutic tumor staging, FDG-PET specificity of 80% is sufficient, but FDG-PET sensitivity of 50% is rather low. However, the initial staging of regional lymph nodes is less important because at the moment there is no pretherapeutic therapy stratification based on lymph node category. The accuracy for correct identification of recurrence in esophageal cancer is higher for FDG-PET than for CT scan. Unfortunately until today no reliable essays for prediction of response or prognosis exist for esophageal cancer in clinical practice for patients with neoadjuvant treatment. Thus the identification of parameters predicting response and/or prognosis is crucial for the future. Post-therapeutic assessment of tumor response by FDG-PET has been shown to correlate with histopathologic tumor regression and patient survival. Furthermore, quantitative measurements of tumor FDG-uptake may allow an early metabolic response evaluation after only 2 weeks of therapy. An association of metabolic response with histopathologic tumor regression and patient outcome 2 weeks after initiation of preoperative chemotherapy may be shown for esophageal cancer.     

Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Thirty-one patients with suspected recurrence after surgery were included. Inclusion criteria were sudden weight loss, pain or increased CA 19-9 levels. FDG-PET was performed in all patients. After visual analysis, maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were determined by placing regions of interest on the pancreas bed. Additionally, all patients underwent contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (n = 14) or MR (n = 17) imaging. Positive findings at FDG-PET or CT/MRI were compared to follow-up. RESULTS: All patients relapsed. Of 25 patients with local recurrences upon follow-up, initial imaging suggested relapse in 23 patients. Of these, FDG-PET detected 96% (22/23) and CT/MRI 39% (9/23). Local SUVmax ranged from 2.26 to 16.9 (mean, 6.06). Among 12 liver metastases, FDG-PET detected 42% (5/12). CT/MRI detected 92% (11/12) correctly. Moreover, 7/9 abdominal lesions were malignant upon follow-up of which FDG-PET detected 7/7 and CT/MR detected none. Additionally, FDG-PET detected extra-abdominal metastases in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: In patients suspected of pancreatic cancer relapse; FDG-PET reliably detected local recurrences, whereas CT/MRI was more sensitive for the detection of hepatic metastases. Furthermore, FDG-PET proved to be advantageous for the detection of nonlocoregional and extra-abdominal recurrences.     

Role of positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[<Superscript>18</Superscript>F]fluoro-d-glucose in evaluating the effects of arterial infusion chemotherapy and radiotherapy on pancreatic cancer

Background This study evaluated the usefulness of positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG-PET) in monitoring the response to continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy (CAI) combined with external radiation therapy (ERT) for unresectable pancreatic carcinomas.Methods Ten patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this study. Computed tomography (CT) and FDG-PET were done before and after CAI (5-fluorouracil [FU], 500mg/body per day) combined with ERT (50.4Gy total dose). Tumor regression was evaluated by standardized uptake value (SUV) with FDG-PET, tumor size on CT, and changes in blood levels of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9. The three methods of evaluation were compared.Results The ten patients were classified in three categories. In category I, tumor changes evident on CT and FDG-PET were consistent. In category II, CT could not accurately detect the area of the tumor. However, tumor uptake on FDG-PET decreased markedly after the treatment in category II patients. In category III, both CT and FDG-PET detected the tumor, as in category I. Although there was no definite change in tumor size on CT, FDG-PET uptake was markedly reduced immediately after the treatment. Reduction in tumor size did not appear on CT until 2 months later.Conclusions FDG-PET aids in analysis of the effectiveness of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.     

Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in surgery for pancreatic cancer

AIM： To evaluate the role of positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose （FDG-PET） in the surgical management of patients with pancreatic cancer, including the diagnosis, staging, and selection of patients for the subsequent surgical treatment. METHODS： This study involved 53 patients with proven primary pancreatic cancer. The sensitivity of diagnosing the primary cancer was examined for FDG-PET CT, cytological examination of the bile or pancreatic juice, and the serum levels of carcinoembrionic antigens （CEA） and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 （CA29-9）. Next, the accuracy of staging was compared between FDG-PET and CT. Finally, FDG-PET was analyzed semiquantitatively using the standard uptake value （SUV）. The impact of the SUV on patient management was evaluated by examining the correlations between the SUV and the histological findings of cancer. RESULTS： The sensitivity of FDG-PET, CT, cytological examination of the bile or pancreatic juice, and the serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 were 92.5%, 88.7%, 46.4%, 37.7% and 69.8%, respectively. In staging, FDG-PET was superior to CT only in diagnosing distant disease （bone metastasis）. For local staging, the sensitivity of CT was better than that of FDG-PEr. The SUV did not correlate with the pTNM stage, grades, invasions to the vessels and nerve, or with the size of the tumor. However, there was a statistically significant difference （4.6 ± 2.9 vs 7.8 ± 4.5, P = 0.024） in the SUV between patients with respectable and unresectable disease. CONCLUSION： FDG-PET is thus considered to be useful in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, regarding the staging of the disease, FDG-PET is not considered to be a sufficiently accurate diagnostic modality. Although the SUV does not correlate with the patho-histological prognostic factors, it may be useful in selecting patients who should undergo subsequent surgical treatment.     

Positron emission tomography and pathological evidence of response to neoadjuvant therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

SUMMARY.  Our aim was to determine if fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated with a pathological response in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation therapy. Patients with resectable, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were entered in the study. Preoperative chemotherapy comprised two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiation therapy commenced with the second cycle on day 22. FDG-PET images were obtained pre-treatment and on completion of intended neo-adjuvant treatment. Quantification was achieved by the calculation of both standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor/liver ratios (TLR). Evidence of histopathological response was identified according to the Mandard tumor regression scoring system. There were 45 patients, 22 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 23 chemoradiation therapy. Forty patients underwent surgical resection. Seven patients (16%) had a histopathological response. The mean percentage change in SUV in the histological responders group was –56.8% (SD 29) and in the non-responders –27.8% (SD 32.1) ( P =  0.035). The mean percentage change in TLR was –49.1% (SD 44.8) in the responders and in the non-responders –27.3% (SD 31.3) ( P =  0.128). There was no difference between the two methods of assessment, however there was less variation with SUV. There was no correlation between the FDG-PET response and the histopathological response. Presently an FDG-PET scan performed 3–6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus should not be used as a marker of the potential result of the treatment. The optimal timing of a second FDG-PET remains unclear.     

FDG-PET scanning in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers

This review deals with the current, well-established indications for two-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scanning in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. FDG-PET is a non-invasive, functional imaging technique. FDG exploits the native glucose transporter to enter the cell. Since many tumours have enhanced glucose uptake, FDG is readily accumulated in malignant cells and can be detected by a PET camera. FDG-PET has been established as an important diagnostic tool in clinical oncology. This review deals with the current, well-established indications for FDG-PET scanning in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. In the current practice, FDG-PET is most commonly used to stage oesophageal carcinoma, to detect and stage recurrence of colorectal carcinoma and to differentiate between benign and malignant pancreatic lesions. The benefit of FDG-PET scanning in patients with oesophagus carcinoma is best established in stage IV disease, as the diagnostic accuracy to detect metastatic disease is higher compared to the combination of computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). In patients with a history of colorectal carcinoma, FDG-PET scanning is particularly effective in diagnosing recurrent disease, especially in those with a rising carcinoembryonic antigen without a suspect lesion on conventional imaging. Large series have indicated that the sensitivity and specificity for detecting recurrent colorectal carcinoma are in the range of 87%-100% and 66%-100%, respectively. Equally, FDG-PET has a high sensitivity (68%-96%) and specificity (78%-100%) in detecting pancreatic carcinoma in patients with a suspicious-looking pancreatic mass on CT scan. Lastly, we focus on the use of FDG-PET as a modality for early monitoring of treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Without doubt, future developments will further establish the diagnostic role of the FDG-PET scan in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancers.     

Role of positron emission tomography in the (re-)staging of oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: Various studies have demonstrated that 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), measuring altered tissue glucose metabolism, is a promising non-invasive method for detecting both distant nodal and haematogenous metastases in patients with oesophageal carcinoma (OC) and might thus prevent futile esophagectomy. Moreover, FDG-PET is a promising tool in assessing response to non-surgical treatment, and might therefore be used for an early decision on whether treatment should be stopped or continued. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of the recent literature regarding the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET in the preoperative staging of patients with OC and regarding diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with OC compared to conventional techniques (especially computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)). RESULTS: A search of the literature resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies on the diagnostic value of FDG-PET. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of locoregional metastases were moderate. Sensitivity and specificity were reasonable for distant metastases. The diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET in assessing response to treatment was similar to the accuracy of EUS, but significantly higher than that of CT. CONCLUSIONS: The staging value of FDG-PET in OC patients is limited in the detection of locoregional metastases; however; its value is higher in the detection of distant lymphatic and haematogenous metastases. Moreover, FDG-PET is a valuable tool for the non-invasive assessment of histopathologic tumour response after neoadjuvant therapy..     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in patients with cancer, the role of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for diagnosis and monitoring treatment response

Active tuberculosis (TB) infection including asymptomatic and extrapulmonary disease may be detected with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). This report highlights the promising role of FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of TB in high-risk, immunocompromised patients with cancer. PET/CT performed for cancer evaluation may detect asymptomatic infection and guide definitive diagnosis. It may also be a useful tool in the assessment of latent TB, to exclude active disease prior to treatment. PET/CT has potential for monitoring response to anti-tuberculosis treatment. Metabolic response may indicate clinical response and guide duration of anti-microbial therapy.     

Usefulness of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of postoperative recurrence of lung cancer]

No standardized postoperative follow-up strategy has been established for lung cancer patients, although CT and tumor markers are often employed. We conducted a retrospective study evaluating fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the diagnosis of postoperative recurrence of lung cancer. We evaluated 28 patients with suspected postoperative recurrence of lung cancer, who underwent FDG-PET between July 2004 and November 2005. Of these, 15 showed positive PET finings. Recurrence of lung cancer cases confirmed in 14 of these and the remaining case showed a postoperative scar. Thirteen patients with no findings on PET scan have demonstrated no evidence of recurrence during follow-up periods between 10 to 23 months. The negative predictive value was therefore 100%. FDG-PET in addition to chest CT and tumor markers for the diagnosis of the postoperative recurrence of lung cancer is considered to be beneficial in terms of avoiding excessive radiation exposure and limiting medical costs, but further evaluation in more patients is necessary.     

Intrapancreatic accessory spleen. A rare cause of a pancreatic mass.

CONCLUSION: The clinical significance of intrapancreatic accessory spleens resides in the mimicry of pancreatic cancer. Radionuclide tests (Octreotide scan and Tc99m sulfur colloid scan) should be undertaken to distinguish these lesions from neuroendocrine tumors, hypervascular metastases and pancreatic carcinoma. If the tests are equivocal, diagnostic laparotomy or laparoscopy is recommended. BACKGROUND: Despite its relatively common occurrence, intrapancreatic ectopic splenic tissue is rarely detected owing to its asymptomatic nature. METHODS: We report a case of a clinically asymptomatic patient in which abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans revealed a mass of 1.5 cm in diameter in the distal pancreas. The tumor markers CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were slightly elevated, and pancreatic neoplasm was suspected. RESULTS: Left pancreatic resection and splenectomy were performed. The removed specimen disclosed the presence of an accessory spleen within the pancreatic tail.     

Comparing whole body (18)F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE: At present, bone metastases are usually assessed using conventional technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate whole-body bone scan, which has a high sensitivity but a poor specificity. However, positron emission tomography with (18)F-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) can offer superior spatial resolution and improved specificity. We attempted to evaluate the usefulness of FDG-PET for detecting bone metastases in breast cancer and to compare FDG-PET results with bone scan findings. PATIENTS: The study group comprised 48 patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer and suspected of having bone metastases who underwent bone scan and FDG-PET to detect the bone metastases. The final diagnosis of bone metastases was established by operative, histopathological findings or during a clinical follow-up longer than 1 year by additional radiographs or following FDG-PET/bone scan findings showing progressive widespread bone lesions. RESULTS: A total of 127 bone lesions including 105 metastatic and 22 benign bone lesions found by either FDG-PET or bone scan were evaluated. Using FDG-PET, 100 metastatic and 20 benign bone lesions were accurately diagnosed, and using bone scan 98 metastatic and 2 benign bone lesions were accurately diagnosed. The diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of FDG-PET were 95.2% and 94.5%, and of bone scan were 93.3% and 78.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that FDG-PET shows a similar sensitivity and a better accuracy than bone scan for detecting bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.     

Response monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy using CT, EUS, and FDG-PET

Neoadjuvant or adjuvant multimodality therapy in oesophageal cancer is introduced in an effort to improve prognosis. However, in a substantial fraction of patients there is no response to this non-surgical therapy. Non-invasive imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) have been evaluated for assessing patient response to therapy, and these are described in this review. Currently, FDG-PET seems to be the best available tool for neoadjuvant therapy response assessment in oesophageal cancer.     

Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested an increased risk of peritoneal seeding in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by percutaneous FNA. EUS-FNA is an alternate method of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis as a treatment failure pattern in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer identified 46 patients in whom the diagnosis was made by EUS-FNA and 43 with the diagnosis established by percutaneous FNA. All had neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Patients underwent restaging CT after completion of therapy, followed by attempted surgical resection if there was no evidence of disease progression. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tumor characteristics between the two study groups. In the EUS-FNA group, one patient had developed peritoneal carcinomatosis compared with 7 in the percutaneous FNA group (2.2% vs. 16.3%; p<0.025). No patient with a potentially resectable tumor in the EUS-FNA group had developed peritoneal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal carcinomatosis may occur more frequently in patients who undergo percutaneous FNA compared with those who have EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. A concern for peritoneal seeding of pancreatic cancer via percutaneous FNA is warranted. EUS-guided FNA is recommended as the method of choice for diagnosis in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.     

Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been shown to be very accurate in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the absence of pancreatic cancer in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer is not well documented. Our aim was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS in patients with a suspicion of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed, from our EUS database (between January 1999 and March 2003), 693 patients who were suspected of having pancreatic cancer and had EUS examinations. A total of 155 patients were found by EUS to have a completely normal pancreas. Indications for EUS in these patients included: weight loss/abdominal pain; and/or pancreatic enlargement/fullness on computed tomography (CT); and/or bile duct/pancreatic duct narrowing on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; and/or an elevated CA 19-9. Follow-up information was obtained in 135/155 (87%) patients from patient phone calls and/or physician visits and/or CT scan. The mean follow-up period was 25 months (range 8-48 months). RESULTS: No patients developed pancreatic cancer during the follow-up period. Following the EUS examination, no work-up was required in 119/135 (88%) of patients. CT scan was performed in 16 patients at 6 months post-procedure, none of which showed a pancreatic mass. The NPV of EUS in excluding pancreatic cancer in those patients with follow-up was 100%. CONCLUSION: EUS is highly specific in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with a NPV of 100% and obviates the need for further diagnostic testing. In patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer, EUS should be considered as the initial diagnostic modality.     

Clinical impact of 18F-FDG-PET in the suspicion of recurrent colorectal cancer based on asymptomatically elevated serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To retrospectively evaluate the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to detect recurrent colorectal cancer based on asymptomatically elevated tumor marker level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). METHODOLOGY: Whole-body FDG-PET was performed in 50 patients suspected of having recurrent colorectal cancer and asymptomatically increased serum level of CEA (> 5 ng/mL), but other negative or equivocal imaging modality results. A blood sample was drawn in each case for CEA assay on the same day as the FDG-PET. The final diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer was established by operation/biopsy histopathological findings or clinical follow-up longer than 1 year by additional morphologic imaging techniques. RESULTS: Among the 50 patients, the final diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer was established in 64 lesions of 45 patients. FDG-PET could accurately detect 62 lesions but missed 2 false-negative lesions. In addition, there were 2 false-positive lesions. On a lesion-based analysis, the diagnostic sensitivity and positive predictive value of FDG-PET was 96.9%. There were 2 patients with false-negative lesions and 2 patients with false-positive lesions. Therefore, FDG-PET findings could lead to successful surgical resection in 41 (82.0%) patients. In addition, on a patient-based analysis, the diagnostic sensitivity and positive predictive value of FDG-PET was 95.3%. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is a useful technique for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer suspected by asymptomatically elevated serum level of CEA and has an important clinical impact on the management in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer.     

Effect of Immunosuppressive Therapy and Biopsy Status in Monitoring Therapy Response in Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis

BackgroundPatients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis frequently undergo fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess disease activity at baseline and after treatment initiation.ObjectivesThis study investigated the effect of immunosuppressive therapy and biopsy status to achieve complete treatment response (CTR), partial treatment response (PTR), or no response (NR) on myocardial FDG-PET/CT.MethodsThis study analyzed 83 patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis (aged 53 ± 1.8 years, 71% were male, 69% were White, 61% had a history of biopsy-confirmed sarcoidosis) who were treatment naive, had evidence of myocardial FDG at baseline, and underwent repeat PET imaging after treatment initiation. CTR was graded visually, and PTR/NR were measured both visually and quantitatively using the total glycolytic activity. Patients were also evaluated for the occurrence of death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure admissions.ResultsOverall, 59 patients (71%) achieved CTR/PTR (30%/41%) at follow-up scan (P = 0.04). Total glycolytic activity and visual estimate of PTR/NR had excellent agreement (κ = 0.86 [95% CI: 0.72-0.99]; P < 0.0001). In patients receiving prednisone only, the highest rates of CTR/PTR were observed in patients initiated on moderate or high dose (P < 0.01). In a regression model, moderate prednisone start dose (P = 0.03) was more strongly associated with achieving CTR/PTR than was high prednisone start dose. However, the latter patients were tapered faster between start dose and follow-up scan (P < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 4.7 (IQR: 3.1-7.8) years, patients who were biopsy-proven (vs non-biopsy-proven; P = 0.029) and with preserved left ventricular function (P = 002) were less likely to experience major adverse cardiac events. Outcomes based on treatment response status (CTR vs PTR vs NR; P = 0.23) were not significantly different.ConclusionsAmong patients with suspected sarcoidosis and evidence of myocardial inflammation, treatment response by serial FDG-PET was variable, but a favorable response was more common when using moderate-to-high intensity prednisone dose. Biopsy-proven individuals and those with preserved systolic function were less likely to experience adverse outcomes during follow-up.     

Diagnostic imaging for pancreatic cancer: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography

Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) are sophisticated modalities typically used in the second-line diagnosis following routine clinical practice. Among them, CT is regarded as the standard imaging in diagnosing pancreatic cancer at present in Japan due to its popularity and reasonable reliability in wide-ranging diagnostic ability. However, even with multidetector row CT (MDCT), the demonstration of pancreatic cancer less than 1 cm in size remains nearly impossible. CT staging is considered accurate in one-half to two-thirds of patients, but limitations in the imaging of peripancreatic microinvasion and nodal or hepatic micrometastases still have a tendency to underestimate tumor extension. With recent advancement in imaging techniques, MRI has proven to be equal or superior to other imaging modalities in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Most of all, it is expected that MRCP will become as effective an instrument as ultra-sonography (US) in the screening of pancreatic cancer. Functional imaging with PET using the glucose analog FDG can be used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, but systemic or local disturbance of glucose metabolism may result in an incorrect diagnosis. The usefulness of PET is now considered in assessing tumor viability, monitoring tumor response to treatment, and detecting distant metastases.     

Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study of patients who were referred for surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) assessed the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) with radiolabeled [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in staging mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs). DESIGN: From January 2001 to September 2002, 90 patients with suspected or proven NSCLC who had been referred for curative resection were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were without evidence of metastatic disease. Sixty-nine of the 90 patients had undergone thoracic FDG-PET imaging as part of their evaluation and are the focus of this study. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for metastasis to the MLN were calculated for CT scanning vs FDG-PET scanning. Four algorithms for staging MLN with mediastinoscopy and/or FDG-PET scan were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients underwent preoperative CT and FDG-PET scans, and 32 of 69 patients underwent mediastinoscopy. Fifty-seven patients underwent thoracotomy with complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for CT scans and FDG-PET scans were 46%, 86%, 78%, 43%, and 87%, and 62%, 98%, 91%, 89% and 92%, respectively. Mediastinoscopy was accurate in 32 of 32 patients (100%). Routine mediastinoscopy remains the most economically reasonable strategy with excellent sensitivity. Selective FDG-PET imaging improved the sensitivity of noninvasive staging for patients with normal MLNs on CT scans. CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of FDG-PET imaging improves staging accuracy compared to CT scanning alone and makes it a cost-effective adjunct to the preoperative staging of NSCLC. However, in patients with adenocarcinoma and MLNs of < 1 cm, FDG-PET scanning cannot yet replace mediastinoscopy.     

~（18）F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer

AIM:To investigate the role of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography(FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer. METHODS:This study involved 31 patients with proven invasive ductal cancer of the pancreas.The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the maximum diameter of the tumor:TS1(maximum tumor size≤2.0 cm) ,TS2(>2.0 cm and≤4.0 cm) or TS3-4(>4.0 cm) .The relationships between the TS and various diagnostic tools,including FDG-PET with dual time point evaluation,were anal...