Prospective subgroup analyses of the randomized MCL‐002 (SPRINT) study: lenalidomide versus investigator's choice in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

In the mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)‐002 study, lenalidomide demonstrated significantly improved median progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with investigator's choice (IC) in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Here we present the long‐term follow‐up data and results of preplanned subgroup exploratory analyses from MCL‐002 to evaluate the potential impact of demographic factors, baseline clinical characteristics and prior therapies on PFS. In MCL‐002, patients with relapsed/refractory MCL were randomized 2:1 to receive lenalidomide (25 mg/day orally on days 1–21; 28‐day cycles) or single‐agent IC therapy (rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil or cytarabine). The intent‐to‐treat population comprised 254 patients (lenalidomide, n = 170; IC, n = 84). Subgroup analyses of PFS favoured lenalidomide over IC across most characteristics, including risk factors, such as high MCL International Prognostic Index score, age ≥65 years, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), stage III/IV disease, high tumour burden, and refractoriness to last prior therapy. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, factors associated with significantly longer PFS (other than lenalidomide treatment) included normal LDH levels (P < 0·001), nonbulky disease (P = 0·045), <3 prior antilymphoma treatments (P = 0·005), and ≥6 months since last prior treatment (P = 0·032). Overall, lenalidomide improved PFS versus single‐agent IC therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, irrespective of many demographic factors, disease characteristics and prior treatment history.     

Favourable outcomes of poor prognosis diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated with dose‐dense Rituximab,high‐dose Methotrexate and six cycles of CHOP‐14 compared to first‐line autologous transplantation

The optimal therapeutic approach for young diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with high‐intermediate and high‐risk age‐adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI) remains unknown. Hereby we report a 10‐year single‐centre study of 63 consecutively treated patients. To optimize outcome, two approaches were carried out: Cohort 1 patients received four cycles R‐CHOP‐21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone over 21 days) followed by first‐line high‐dose chemotherapy with autologous stem‐cell support (HDCT‐ASCT), resulting in 2‐year progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 60·6% and 67·9%. 39·4% of those patients were not transplanted upfront, mainly due to early progressive disease (24·2%). Cohort 2 patients received an early intensified protocol of six cycles of CHOP‐14 (cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone over 14 days) with dose‐dense rituximab and high‐dose methotrexate resulting in promising overall response‐ (93·3%) and complete remission (90%) rates and sustained survival (2‐year PFS and OS: 93·3%). In an intention‐to‐treat analysis, 2‐year PFS (60·6% vs. 93·3%, hazard ratio [HR] 7·2, P = 0·009) and OS (69·7% vs. 93·3%, HR 4·95, P = 0·038) differed significantly, in favour of the early intensified protocol (Cohort 2). In a multivariate Cox‐regression model, PFS (HR 8·12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1·83–35·9, P = 0·006) and OS (HR 5·86, 95% CI 1·28–26·8, P = 0·02) remained superior for Cohort 2 when adjusted for aaIPI3 as the most important prognostic factor. Survival of young poor‐prognosis DLBCL patients appears superior after early therapy intensification.     

Phase II study of bortezomib,cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone as induction therapy in multiple myeloma: DSMM XI trial

We assessed the safety and efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) induction therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. A total of 414 patients received three 21‐day cycles of VCD prior to autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT). Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were leucopenia (31·4%) and thrombocytopenia (6·8%). The overall response rate (ORR) by investigator‐based assessment was 85·4%. Most patients (74%) underwent successful central laboratory‐based molecular cytogenetic analysis. No clinically relevant differences in ORR post‐induction were seen between patients with or without high‐risk cytogenetic abnormalities (86·2% vs. 84·3%). Further follow‐up data are available for 113 patients receiving ASCT who were included in a prospective consolidation trial (median follow‐up, 55·5 months); median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 35·3 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. In patients with high‐risk versus standard‐risk cytogenetics, median PFS was 19·9 vs. 43·6 months (P < 0·0001), and median OS was 54·7 months versus not reached (P = 0·0022). VCD is an effective and tolerable induction regimen; results suggest that VCD induces high response rates independently of cytogenetic risk status, but after long‐term follow‐up, cytogenetic high risk is associated with markedly reduced PFS and OS post‐ASCT.     

Long‐term follow‐up of patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: mixed T‐cell chimerism is associated with high relapse risk and inferior survival

There is limited information regarding the immunological predictors of post‐allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), such as mixed T‐cell chimerism. We analysed 143 consecutive patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, transplanted between 2000 and 2012, to determine the prognostic relevance of mixed chimerism post‐alloSCT and the ability of post‐transplant immunomodulation to treat relapse. Mixed T‐cell chimerism occurred in 50% of patients at 3 months and 43% at 6 months post‐alloSCT; upon 3‐ and 6‐month landmark analysis, this was associated with inferior progression‐free survival (PFS) [Hazard ratio (HR) 1·93, P = 0·003 and HR 2·58, P < 0·001] and survival (HR 1·66, P = 0·05 and HR 2·17, P < 0·001), independent of baseline patient characteristics, and a lower rate of grade II–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GHVD) (16% vs. 52%, P < 0·001). Thirty‐three patients were treated with immunomodulation for relapse post‐alloSCT (immunosuppression withdrawal, n = 6, donor lymphocyte infusion, n = 27); 17 achieved complete response (CR), which predicted superior PFS (53 months vs. 10 months, P < 0·001) and survival (117 months vs. 30 months, P = 0·006). Relapsed patients with mixed chimerism had inferior response to immunomodulation; conversion to full donor chimerism was highly correlated both with CR and with the development of severe acute GVHD, which was fatal in 3/8 patients. Novel therapeutic strategies are required for patients with mixed T‐cell chimerism post‐alloSCT for CLL.     

Clinical applicability and prognostic significance of molecular response assessed by fluorescent‐PCR of immunoglobulin genes in multiple myeloma. Results from a GEM/PETHEMA study

Minimal residual disease monitoring is becoming increasingly important in multiple myeloma (MM), but multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and allele‐specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (ASO‐PCR) techniques are not routinely available. This study investigated the prognostic influence of achieving molecular response assessed by fluorescent‐PCR (F‐PCR) in 130 newly diagnosed MM patients from Grupo Español Multidisciplinar de Melanoma (GEM)2000/GEM05 trials (NCT00560053, NCT00443235, NCT00464217) who achieved almost very good partial response after induction therapy. As a reference, we used the results observed with simultaneous MFC. F‐PCR at diagnosis was performed on DNA using three different multiplex PCRs: IGH D‐J, IGK V‐J and KDE rearrangements. The applicability of F‐PCR was 91·5%. After induction therapy, 64 patients achieved molecular response and 66 non‐molecular response; median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 61 versus 36 months, respectively (P = 0·001). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR) in molecular response patients (5‐year survival: 75%) versus 66 months in the non‐molecular response group (P = 0·03). The corresponding PFS and OS values for patients with immunophenotypic versus non‐immunophenotypic response were 67 versus 42 months (P = 0·005) and NR (5‐year survival: 95%) versus 69 months (P = 0·004), respectively. F‐PCR analysis is a rapid, affordable, and easily performable technique that, in some circumstances, may be a valid approach for minimal residual disease investigations in MM.     

Carfilzomib,lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma categorised by age: secondary analysis from the phase 3 ASPIRE study

A primary analysis of the ASPIRE study found that the addition of carfilzomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS ) compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM ). This post hoc analysis examined outcomes from ASPIRE in patients categorised by age. In the carfilzomib group, 103/396 patients were ≥70 years old, and in the control group, 115/396 patients were ≥70 years old. Median PFS for patients <70 years old was 28·6 months for the carfilzomib group versus 17·6 months for the control group [hazard ratio (HR ), 0·701]. Median PFS for patients ≥70 years old was 23·8 months for the carfilzomib group versus 16·0 months for the control group (HR , 0·753). For patients <70 years the overall response rate (ORR ) was 86·0% (carfilzomib group) and 66·9% (control group); for patients ≥70 years old the ORR was 90·3% (carfilzomib group) and 66·1% (control group). Within the carfilzomib group, grade ≥3 cardiovascular adverse events occurred more frequently among patients ≥70 years old compared with patients <70 years old. Carfilzomib‐lenalidomide‐dexamethasone has a favourable benefit‐risk profile for patients with RMM , including elderly patients ≥70 years old. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01080391.     

Lenalidomide plus rituximab can produce durable clinical responses in patients with relapsed or refractory,indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory, indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients were treated with daily lenalidomide in 28‐d cycles and weekly rituximab for 4 weeks. Lenalidomide was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Twenty‐two patients were assessed for FCGR3A polymorphisms. Thirty patients were enrolled; 27 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate (ORR) was 74% including 44% complete responses (CR); median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 12·4 months. The 13 rituximab refractory patients had an ORR of 61·5% (four CR/unconfirmed CR). The ORR was 77% in the 22 follicular lymphoma patients (nine CR/unconfirmed CR). At a median follow‐up time of 43 months, the median duration of response and time to next therapy were 15·4 and 37·4 months, respectively. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (45%), neutropenia (55%), fatigue (23%) and hyponatraemia (9%). The ORR and PFS in patients with low‐affinity FCGR3A polymorphisms (F/F and F/V) suggest that lenalidomide may improve the activity of rituximab in these patients. These data suggest that combining lenalidomide with rituximab can produce durable responses with acceptable toxicity in patients with indolent NHL.     

Hodgkin lymphoma: a negative interim‐PET cannot circumvent the need for end‐of‐treatment‐PET evaluation

We examined the outcome of a cohort of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in order to assess if fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) at the end of treatment (end‐PET) can be omitted when the interim PET (int‐PET) is negative. Seventy‐six ABVD(adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine)‐treated patients were retrospectively included. No change in treatment was made on the basis of int‐PET results. Suspicious foci on end‐PET received biopsy confirmation whenever possible. Median follow‐up was 58·9 months. Uptake on int‐PET higher than liver (scores 4–5) was rated positive according to the Lugano classification, while a positive end‐PET corresponded to scores 3, 4 and 5. Fifteen patients had treatment failure. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value and accuracy of int‐PET were 46·7%, 85·2%, 43·8%, 86·7% and 77·6%, respectively. For end‐PET the figures were: 80%, 93·4%, 75%, 95% and 90·8%. Eight patients with negative int‐PET had treatment failure; six of them were identified as non‐responders with end‐PET. The 5‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) was 87% for patients with negative int‐PET versus 56% with positive int‐PET. The 5‐year PFS was 96% with negative end‐PET versus 23% with positive end‐PET. The prognostic information from int‐PET as regards PFS (log‐rank test P = 0·0048) was lower than that provided by end‐PET (P < 0·0001). Int‐PET predicted only half of the failures. When used in clinical routine, a negative int‐PET study cannot obviate the need for end‐PET examination.     

Effects of single‐agent bortezomib as post‐transplant consolidation therapy on multiple myeloma‐related bone disease: a randomized phase II study

This phase II study explored the effects of bortezomib consolidation versus observation on myeloma‐related bone disease in patients who had a partial response or better after frontline high‐dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients were randomized to receive four 35‐day cycles of bortezomib 1·6 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, or an equivalent observation period, and followed up for disease status/survival. The modified intent‐to‐treat population included 104 patients (51 bortezomib, 53 observation). There were no meaningful differences in the primary endpoint of change from baseline to end of treatment in bone mineral density (BMD). End‐of‐treatment rates (bortezomib versus observation) of complete response/stringent complete response were 22% vs. 11% (P = 0·19), very good partial response or better of 80% vs. 68% (P = 0·17), and progressive disease of 8% vs. 23% (P = 0·06); median progression‐free survival was 44·9 months vs. 21·8 months (P = 0·22). Adverse events observed ≥15% more frequently with bortezomib versus observation were diarrhoea (37% vs. 0), peripheral sensory neuropathy (20% vs. 4%), nausea (18% vs. 0) and vomiting (16% vs. 0). Compared with observation, bortezomib appeared to have little impact on bone metabolism/health, but was associated with trends for improved myeloma response and survival.     

Phase 2 study of tabalumab,a human anti‐B‐cell activating factor antibody,with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma

In this double‐blind, Phase 2 study, 220 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive placebo (N  = 72), tabalumab 100 mg (N  = 74), or tabalumab 300 mg (N  = 74), each in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg and subcutaneous bortezomib 1·3 mg/m² on a 21‐day cycle. No significant intergroup differences were observed among primary (median progression‐free survival [mPFS ]) or secondary efficacy outcomes. The mPFS was 6·6, 7·5 and 7·6 months for the tabalumab 100, 300 mg and placebo groups, respectively (tabalumab 100 mg vs. placebo Hazard ratio (HR ) [95% confidence interval (CI )] = 1·13 [0·80–1·59], P  =  0·480; tabalumab 300 mg vs. placebo HR [95% CI ] = 1·03 [0·72–1·45], P  =  0·884). The most commonly‐reported treatment‐emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (37%), fatigue (37%), diarrhoea (35%) and constipation (32%). Across treatments, patients with low baseline BAFF (also termed TNFSF 13B) expression (n  = 162) had significantly longer mPFS than those with high BAFF expression (n  = 55), using the 75th percentile cut‐off point (mPFS [95% CI ] = 8·3 [7·0–9·3] months vs. 5·8 [3·7–6·6] months; HR [95% CI ] = 1·59 [1·11–2·29], P  =  0·015). Although generally well tolerated, PFS was not improved during treatment with tabalumab compared to placebo. A higher dose of 300 mg tabalumab did not improve efficacy compared to the 100 mg dose. Nonetheless, BAFF appears to have some prognostic value in patients with multiple myeloma.     

Outcomes in 370 patients with mantle cell lymphoma treated with ibrutinib: a pooled analysis from three open‐label studies

Ibrutinib is highly active in treating mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive B‐cell lymphoma. We pooled data from three ibrutinib studies to explore the impact of baseline patient characteristics on treatment response. Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL (n = 370) treated with ibrutinib had an objective response rate (ORR) of 66% (20% complete response; 46% partial response); median duration of response (DOR), progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18·6, 12·8 and 25·0 months, respectively. Univariate analyses showed patients with one versus >one prior line of therapy had longer OS. Multivariate analyses identified that one prior line of therapy affected PFS; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, simplified MCL international prognostic index (sMIPI) score, bulky disease, and blastoid histology affected OS and PFS. Patients with blastoid versus non‐blastoid histology had similar time to best response, but lower ORR, DOR, PFS and OS. OS and PFS were longer in patients with better sMIPI, patients with ECOG performance status 0–1, non‐bulky disease and non‐blastoid histology. Additionally, the proportion of patients with poor prognostic factors increased with increasing lines of therapy. Together, results suggest that patient outcomes following treatment failure with ibrutinib are related to the natural biological evolution of the disease.     

Single‐agent lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: results from a UK phase II study suggest activity and possible gender differences

We present data from a phase II study investigating a novel treatment strategy for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Twenty‐six patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/d (days 1–21 of a 28‐d cycle) for up to 6 cycles followed by low‐dose maintenance lenalidomide (15 mg) in responding patients. Eight patients achieved complete or partial response to give an overall response rate of 31% with median response duration of 22·2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·0–53·6] and median progression‐free survival (PFS) of 3·9 months (95% CI 0·0–11·1). An additional six patients (23%) achieved stable disease. Eleven patients received maintenance with median PFS of 14·6 months (95% CI 7·3–21·9). Correlative studies showed that peripheral T and Natural Killer (NK) cells increased in responding patients by 40–60% over the first 6 cycles with an initial dip in NK cells suggestive of tumour infiltration. Peripheral regulatory T cells were increased in MCL patients (P = 0·001) and expanded further following lenalidomide. Sequential plasma analysis showed increased IL12 p40 and IL7 alongside decreased MMP9, IL10, and adiponectin. Finally, a significant correlation (P = 0·02) between gender and response suggested that female MCL patients were more sensitive to lenalidomide than males. In summary, we confirm the activity, safety and immunomodulatory properties of lenalidomide in MCL and highlight its potential as a low‐dose maintenance agent.     

The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine,cisplatin, prednisone,thalidomide versus CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T‐cell lymphoma with analysis of biomarkers

We compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, cisplatin, prednisone and thalidomide (GDPT) with standard CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) for patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL) in a prospective randomized controlled and open‐label clinical trial. Between July 2010 and June 2016, 103 patients were randomly allocated into two groups, of whom 52 were treated with GDPT therapy and 51 with CHOP therapy. The 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were better in the GDPT group than in the CHOP group (57% vs. 35% for 2‐year PFS, P = 0·0035; 71% vs 50% for 2‐year OS, P = 0·0001). The complete remission rate (CRR) and the overall response rate (ORR) in the GDPT group were higher than in the CHOP group (52% vs. 33%, P = 0·044 for CRR; 67% vs. 49%, P = 0·046 for ORR). Haemocytopenia was the predominant adverse effect, and acute toxicity was moderate, tolerable and well managed in both arms. mRNA expression of ERCC1, RRM1, TUBB3 and TOP2A genes varied among patients but the difference did not reach statistical significance, mainly due to the relatively small sample size. The precise characters of these biomarkers remain to be identified. In conclusion, GDPT is a promising new regimen as potential first‐line therapy against PTCL. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01664975.     

Improved outcome for children with non‐high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after using an ALL IC‐BFM 2002‐based protocol in Shanghai,China

We report the outcome of 92 non‐high risk children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) following a Berlin‐Frankfürt‐Münster (BFM) Intercontinental ALL ‐based protocol. Compared with a matched historical control group, we found a lower incidence of treatment‐related early death (1·2% vs. 10·9%, P = 0·015), a higher 6‐year event‐free survival (75·4 ± 4·9% vs. 58·2 ± 6·7%, P = 0·02), reduced total in‐hospital costs per person (US $) (10267·0 vs. 18331·0, P < 0·001) and fewer total in‐hospital days (164 vs. 296, P < 0·001). This ALL‐BFM based protocol was quite tolerable in our institution and will be extended to high‐risk patients.     

Haematopoietic cell transplantation with and without sorafenib maintenance for patients with FLT3‐ITD acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission

We performed a retrospective study analysing the effect of sorafenib, an oral fms‐Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3)/multikinase inhibitor, as post‐transplant maintenance in adult patients with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). We identified consecutive patients with FLT3‐ITD AML diagnosed between 2008 and 2014 who received haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first complete remission (CR1). Post‐HCT initiation of sorafenib (yes/no) was evaluated as a time‐varying covariate in the overall survival/progression‐free survival (OS/PFS) analysis and we performed a landmark analysis of controls alive without relapse at the median date of sorafenib initiation. We identified 26 sorafenib patients and 55 controls. Median follow‐up was 27·2 months post‐HCT for sorafenib survivors, and 38·4 months for controls (P = 0·021). The median time to initiating sorafenib was 68 days post‐HCT; 43 controls were alive without relapse at this cut‐off. Sorafenib patients had improved 2‐year OS in the d+68 landmark analysis (81% vs. 62%, P = 0·029). Sorafenib was associated with improved 2‐year PFS (82% vs. 53%, P = 0·0081) and lower 2‐year cumulative incidence of relapse (8·2% vs. 37·7%, P = 0·0077). In multivariate analysis, sorafenib significantly improved OS [Hazard ratio (HR) 0·26, P = 0·021] and PFS (HR 0·25, P = 0·016). There was no difference in 2‐year non‐relapse mortality (9·8% vs. 9·3%, P = 0·82) or 1‐year chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (55·5% vs. 37·2%, P = 0·28). These findings suggest potential benefit of post‐HCT sorafenib in FLT3‐ITD AML, and support further evaluation of post‐HCT FLT3 inhibition.     

Longer‐term follow‐up and outcome by tumour cell proliferation rate (Ki‐67) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma treated with lenalidomide on MCL‐001(EMERGE) pivotal trial

Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) generally respond to first‐line immunochemotherapy, but often show chemoresistance upon subsequent relapses, with poor outcome. Several studies of the immunomodulator, lenalidomide, have demonstrated its activity in MCL including the MCL‐001 study in relapsed/refractory patients who had failed defined prior therapies of anthracyclines or mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and also bortezomib. We present here the long‐term efficacy follow‐up of the prospective phase II MCL‐001 study (N = 134), including new exploratory analyses with baseline Ki‐67 (MIB1), a biological marker of tumour proliferation. With longer follow‐up, lenalidomide showed a 28% overall response rate [ORR; 8% complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu)]. Median duration of response (DOR), progression‐free survival and overall survival were 16·6, 4·0 and 20·9 months, respectively. Myelosuppression continued to be the most common grade 3/4 toxicity. Several studies of MCL patients treated with chemotherapy, rituximab and bortezomib have shown an inverse association between survival and Ki‐67. Ki‐67 data in 81/134 MCL‐001 patients showed similar ORRs in both low (<30% or <50%) versus high (≥30% or ≥50%) Ki‐67–expressing groups, yet lower Ki‐67 levels demonstrated superior CR/CRu, DOR and survival outcomes. Overall, lenalidomide showed durable efficacy with a consistent safety profile in heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory MCL post‐bortezomib.     

Rituximab extended schedule or retreatment trial for low tumour burden non‐follicular indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphomas: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Protocol E4402

The rituximab extended schedule or retreatment trial (RESORT; E4402) was a phase 3 randomized prospective trial comparing maintenance rituximab (MR) versus a retreatment (RR) dosing strategy in asymptomatic, low tumour burden indolent lymphoma. A planned exploratory sub‐study compared the two strategies for small lymphocytic (SLL) and marginal zone lymphomas (MZL). Patients responding to rituximab weekly × 4 were randomized to MR (single dose rituximab every 3 months until treatment failure) or RR (rituximab weekly × 4) at the time of each progression until treatment failure. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTTF). Patients with SLL (n = 57), MZL (n = 71) and unclassifiable small B‐cell lymphoma (n = 3) received induction rituximab. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31–49%; SLL ORR 22·8%; MZL ORR 52·1%]; all 52 responders were randomized. At a median of 4·3 years from randomization, treatment failure occurred in 18/23 RR and 15/29 MR. The median TTTF was 1·4 years for RR and 4·8 years for MR (P = 0·012); median time to first cytotoxic therapy was 6·3 years for RR and not reached for MR (P = 0·0002). Survival did not differ (P = 0·72). In low tumour burden SLL and MZL patients responding to rituximab induction, MR significantly improved TTTF as compared with RR.     

Frontline bortezomib and rituximab for the treatment of newly diagnosed high tumour burden indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicentre phase II study

There is a lack of published data examining non‐cytotoxic options for the frontline treatment of patients with high‐tumour burden (HTB) indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). We completed a multicentre phase II study for patients with untreated HTB iNHL (NCT00369707) consisting of three induction cycles of weekly bortezomib and rituximab followed by an abbreviated consolidation. Forty‐two patients were treated and all were evaluable; the most common histology was follicular lymphoma (FL) (n = 33, 79%). Patient characteristics included median age 62 years (40–86); 38% bulky disease; 19% malignant effusions; 91% advanced‐stage disease; and median FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score was 3. Therapy was well tolerated with few grade 3/4 toxicities including minimal neurotoxicity. On intent‐to‐treat, the overall response rate (ORR) at end of therapy was 70% with a complete remission (CR) rate of 40% (FL: ORR 76%, CR 44%). With 50‐month median follow‐up, 4‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) was 44% with 4‐year overall survival (OS) of 87% (FL: 44% and 97%, respectively). Four‐year PFS for FLIPI 0–2 vs. 3–5 was 60% vs. 26% respectively (P = 0·02), with corresponding OS rates of 92% and 81% respectively (P = 0·16). Collectively, bortezomib/rituximab is a non‐cytotoxic therapeutic regimen that was well tolerated and resulted in long‐term survival rates approximating prior rituximab/cytotoxic chemotherapy series for untreated HTB FL.     

Next‐generation sequencing‐based detection of circulating tumour DNA After allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma

Next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) detection is a promising monitoring tool for lymphoid malignancies. We evaluated whether the presence of ctDNA was associated with outcome after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in lymphoma patients. We studied 88 patients drawn from a phase 3 clinical trial of reduced‐intensity conditioning HSCT in lymphoma. Conventional restaging and collection of peripheral blood samples occurred at pre‐specified time points before and after HSCT and were assayed for ctDNA by sequencing of the immunoglobulin or T‐cell receptor genes. Tumour clonotypes were identified in 87% of patients with adequate tumour samples. Sixteen of 19 (84%) patients with disease progression after HSCT had detectable ctDNA prior to progression at a median of 3·7 months prior to relapse/progression. Patients with detectable ctDNA 3 months after HSCT had inferior progression‐free survival (PFS) (2‐year PFS 58% vs. 84% in ctDNA‐negative patients, P = 0·033). In multivariate models, detectable ctDNA was associated with increased risk of progression/death (Hazard ratio 3·9, P = 0·003) and increased risk of relapse/progression (Hazard ratio 10·8, P = 0·0006). Detectable ctDNA is associated with an increased risk of relapse/progression, but further validation studies are necessary to confirm these findings and determine the clinical utility of NGS‐based minimal residual disease monitoring in lymphoma patients after HSCT.     

The long‐term outcome of patients in the LRF CLL4 trial: the effect of salvage treatment and biological markers in those surviving 10 years

With 10+ years follow‐up in the Leukaemia Research Fund (LRF) CLL4 trial, we report the effect of salvage therapy, and the clinical/biological features of the 10‐year survivors treated for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Overall survival (OS) was similar in the three randomized arms. With fludarabine‐plus‐cyclophosphamide (FC), progression‐free survival (PFS) was significantly longer (P < 0·0001), but OS after progression significantly shorter, than in the chlorambucil or fludarabine arms (P < 0·0001). 614/777 patients progressed; 524 received second‐line and 260 third‐line therapy, with significantly better complete remission (CR) rates compared to first‐line in the chlorambucil arm (7% vs. 13% after second‐, 18% after third‐line), but worse in the FC arm (38% vs. 15% after both second and third‐line). OS 10 years after progression was better after a second‐line CR versus a partial response (36% vs. 16%) and better with FC‐based second‐line therapy (including rituximab in 20%) or a stem cell transplant (28%) versus all other treatments (10%, P < 0·0001). The 176 (24%) 10‐year survivors tended to be aged <70 years, with a “good risk” prognostic profile, stage A‐progressive, achieving at least one CR, with a first‐line PFS >3 years and receiving ≤2 lines of treatment. In conclusion, clinical/biological features and salvage treatments both influence the long‐term outcome. Second‐line therapies that induce a CR can improve OS in CLL patients.