Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: molecular pathogenesis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common and often serious complication of heparin therapy [1,2]. Although the reduction in platelet levels associated with HIT is usually not severe, about 10% of patients experience arterial and/or venous thromboses (HITT), which can be incapacitating or fatal [3]. Recent work done in our laboratory [4] and by others [5-7] has shown that patients with HIT/T* almost invariably have antibodies specific for complexes consisting of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4), a heparin-binding protein found normally in platelet alpha granules. We [4] and others [8] have developed hypotheses to explain how these antibodies cause HIT/T in patients given heparin, but knowledge of the disease process is far from complete. An unusual feature of HIT/T is that antibodies important in pathogenesis are specific for complexes made up of two normal body constituents: PF4 and heparin. These antibodies are produced by a high percentage of certain patient populations treated with heparin, but only a minority of antibody formers are adversely affected. We postulate that a fuller understanding of the molecular basis for this immune response could lead to improved diagnosis, treatment and prevention of HIT/T and to the identification of risk factors that predispose to this complication.     

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinical‐pathological disorder; thus, laboratory testing for the pathogenic platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies is central for diagnosis. The “iceberg” model summarizes the inter‐relationship between platelet activation assays and PF4‐dependent immunoassays, with platelet‐activating antibodies comprising a subset of anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies. The platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA), performed by reference laboratories, has high sensitivity and specificity for HIT (~95% each), and is especially suited for detecting highly pathogenic HIT sera containing both heparin‐dependent and heparin‐independent platelet‐activating antibodies; this latter subgroup of antibodies explains “autoimmune HIT” disorders (delayed‐onset, persisting, spontaneous, heparin “flush,” fondaparinux‐associated). Recently, SRA‐negative HIT has become recognized, in which serum from some HIT patients contains subthreshold levels of platelet‐activating antibodies (by SRA) that become detectable using a PF4‐enhanced platelet activation assay. Unusual immunologic features of HIT include early antibody detectability (at onset of platelet count fall) and antibody transience (seroreversion). Widely available PF4‐dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have high sensitivity but poor specificity for HIT, although specificity is enhanced with IgG‐specific EIAs and strong positive results; unfortunately, EIA results are usually not available in real time. Automated rapid immunoassays, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), facilitate real‐time laboratory diagnosis. Recently available likelihood ratio (LR) data for positive (LR+) and negative (LR?) test results allow clinicians to adjust their pretest probabilities for HIT, using Bayesian analysis, into real‐time posttest probabilities that are dramatically increased (test positive) or decreased (test negative). Moreover, (semi‐)quantitative CLIA‐ and LIA‐positive results (weak, moderate, strong positive) can further refine the posttest probability of HIT.     

Platelet factor 4 binds to bacteria, [corrected] inducing antibodies cross-reacting with the major antigen in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A clinically important adverse drug reaction, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is induced by antibodies specific for complexes of the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) and the polyanion heparin. Even heparin-naive patients can generate anti-PF4/heparin IgG as early as day 4 of heparin treatment, suggesting preimmunization by antigens mimicking PF4/heparin complexes. These antibodies probably result from bacterial infections, as (1) PF4 bound charge-dependently to various bacteria, (2) human heparin-induced anti-PF4/heparin antibodies cross-reacted with PF4-coated Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and (3) mice developed anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during polymicrobial sepsis without heparin application. Thus, after binding to bacteria, the endogenous protein PF4 induces antibodies with specificity for PF4/polyanion complexes. These can target a large variety of PF4-coated bacteria and enhance bacterial phagocytosis in vitro. The same antigenic epitopes are expressed when pharmacologic heparin binds to platelets augmenting formation of PF4 complexes. Boosting of preformed B cells by PF4/heparin complexes could explain the early occurrence of IgG antibodies in HIT. We also found a continuous, rather than dichotomous, distribution of anti-PF4/heparin IgM and IgG serum concentrations in a cross-sectional population study (n = 4029), indicating frequent preimmunization to modified PF4. PF4 may have a role in bacterial defense, and HIT is probably a misdirected antibacterial host defense mechanism.     

Les thrombocytopénies induites par l’héparine : données récentes

Despite less frequent, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a severe complication of treatment with heparin, and is important to diagnose and manage appropriately. HIT results from an atypical immune response to heparin, with the synthesis of IgG antibodies specific to heparin-modified platelet factor 4 (PF4) which activate platelets, leukocytes and the endothelium. This activation explains that low platelet count is associated with thrombotic events in 50% of patients. The diagnosis of HIT is sometimes evoked because of atypical manifestations (i.e. cutaneous necrosis, amnesia, hypotension or dyspnea following intravenous injection of heparin). Biological assays are always necessary to confirm HIT in case of clinical suspicion, and specific rapid tests are now available for detecting anti-PF4 antibodies. However, their specificity is poor and functional assays such as serotonin release assay or platelet aggregation test are often necessary. Argatroban that is a direct antithrombin drug can be used in patients with severe renal failure and will be preferred to danaparoid sodium in this situation. Fondaparinux is not licensed for treating confirmed HIT and can only be used in case of suspicion. The early detection of HIT is based on the monitoring of platelet count recommended in surgical patients receiving a low molecular weight heparin and in all patients treated with unfractionated heparin.     

Further characterization of antibody and antigen in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Patients with immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) possess antibodies that bind to a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. We observed that HIT antibodies will also bind to PF4 alone adsorbed on polystyrene ELISA wells but not to soluble PF4 in the absence of heparin. Having developed a technique to affinity-purify anti-PF4-heparin HIT IgG, we are able to provide the first estimates of the avidity of HIT IgG. HIT IgG displayed relatively high functional affinity for both PF4-heparin (Kd = 7-30 nM) and polystyrene adsorbed PF4 alone (Kd = 20-70 nM). Furthermore, agarose beads coated with PF4 alone were almost as effective as beads coated with PF4 plus heparin in depleting HIT plasmas of anti-PF4-heparin antibodies. We conclude that the HIT antibodies which bind to polystyrene adsorbed PF4 without heparin are largely the same IgG molecules that bind PF4-heparin and therefore most HIT antibodies bind epitope(s) on PF4 and not epitope(s) formed by part of a PF4 molecule and part of a heparin molecule. Binding of PF4 to heparin (optimal) or polystyrene/agarose (suboptimal) promotes recognition of this epitope.     

Investigation of a platelet factor 4 polymorphism on the immune response in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A small fraction of patients who receive heparin develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, of these patients, a still smaller proportion develop associated thrombotic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by the formation of antibodies that bind to specific complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. However, it remains uncertain why certain patients form these antibodies and develop HIT or why certain patients have thrombotic events. In this report we describe studies on individuals with and without HIT to determined if a potential PF4 polymorphism could explain differences in susceptibility to HIT. In the 10 control individuals and the 10 patients we studied, we did not find a difference in the PF4 sequences. Genetic difference in the PF4 antigenic target does not explain the occurrence of HIT in susceptible patients.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: in vitro studies on the interaction of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and low-sulfated heparin, with platelet factor 4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies

Heparin is a widely used anticoagulant. Because of its negative charge, it forms complexes with positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). This can induce anti-PF4/heparin IgG Abs. Resulting immune complexes activate platelets, leading to the prothrombotic adverse drug reaction heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT requires treatment with alternative anticoagulants. Approved for HIT are 2 direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; lepirudin, argatroban) and danaparoid. They are niche products with limitations. We assessed the effects of the DTI dabigatran, the direct factor Xa-inhibitor rivaroxaban, and of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH; a partially desulfated heparin with minimal anticoagulant effects) on PF4/heparin complexes and the interaction of anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban had any effect on the interaction of PF4 or anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. In contrast, ODSH inhibited PF4 binding to gel-filtered platelets, displaced PF4 from a PF4-transfected cell line, displaced PF4/heparin complexes from platelet surfaces, and inhibited anti-PF4/heparin Ab binding to PF4/heparin complexes and subsequent platelet activation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban seem to be options for alternative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT. ODSH prevents formation of immunogenic PF4/heparin complexes, and, when given together with heparin, may have the potential to reduce the risk for HIT during treatment with heparin.     

Investigation of a platelet factor 4 polymorphism on the immune response in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A small fraction of patients who receive heparin develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, of these patients, a still smaller proportion develop associated thrombotic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by the formation of antibodies that bind to specific complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. However, it remains uncertain why certain patients form these antibodies and develop HIT or why certain patients have thrombotic events. In this report we describe studies on individuals with and without HIT to determined if a potential PF4 polymorphism could explain differences in susceptibility to HIT. In the 10 control individuals and the 10 patients we studied, we did not find a difference in the PF4 sequences. Genetic difference in the PF4 antigenic target does not explain the occurrence of HIT in susceptible patients.     

PF4/heparin complexes are T cell-dependent antigens

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, thrombotic disorder associated with development of anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4)/heparin autoantibodies. Little is known about the antigenic and cellular requirements that initiate the immune response to these complexes. To begin to delineate mechanisms of autoantibody formation in HIT, we studied the immunizing effects of murine PF4 (mPF4)/heparin in mice with and without thymic function. Euthymic mice were injected with mPF4/heparin complexes, mPF4, heparin, or buffer. Mice injected with mPF4/heparin, but not mPF4 or heparin alone, developed heparin-dependent autoantibodies that shared serologic and functional characteristics of human HIT antibodies, including preferential binding to mPF4/heparin complexes and causing heparin- and FcRgammaIIA-dependent platelet activation. In contrast, athymic mice did not develop HIT-like antibodies. Taken together, these studies establish that PF4/heparin complexes are highly immunogenic and elicit self-reacting anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in a T cell-dependent manner.     

Evolving concepts of pathogenesis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune reaction to heparin. It often causes severe thrombosis which may lead to limb gangrene and thrombosis‐associated death. The concept of its pathogenesis has been evolving during the past five decades. Initially, HIT was thought to be caused by disseminated intravascular coagulation. Later it became clear that HIT was mediated by an immune mechanism whereby an IgG antibody induced platelet aggregation, release of procoagulant materials and consequently thrombus formation. The antigen comprises Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) and heparin which have a tendency to form ultralarge complexes. The HIT immune response has atypical features. IgG antibody appears early without IgM precedence and lasts transiently. One explanation is that there is prior priming by bacterial infection. Another unique characteristic is that it is processed as if it is a particulate antigen involving complement activation and B cells. Antigen‐presenting cells/monocytes are also involved but the role of T cells is controversial. Recent advances have provided new insights into the underlying mechanisms of HIT‐related thrombosis. Previously, platelets were believed to play a central role; their activation and consequently the induction of blood coagulation was the basis of the hypercoagulability in HIT. More recently, several studies have provided clear evidence that neutrophil and NETosis, monocytes and endothelial cells contribute significantly to the thrombosis in HIT. These new insights may result in development of better diagnostic laboratory assays and more effective treatments for HIT.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: new evidence for the dynamic binding of purified anti-PF4-heparin antibodies to platelets and the resultant platelet activation

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with antibodies directed against a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. We were able to affinity purify anti-PF4-heparin IgG (HIT IgG) from the plasma of 2 patients with HIT. Under conditions that were more physiological and sensitive than those in previous studies, we observed that this HIT IgG caused platelet aggregation on the addition of heparin. Platelets activated with HIT IgG increased their release and surface expression of PF4. We quantitated, for the first time, the binding of affinity-purified HIT iodine 125-IgG to platelets as they activated in a plasma milieu. Binding of the HIT IgG was dependent on heparin and required some degree of platelet activation. Blocking the platelet FcgammaRII with the monoclonal antibody IV.3 did not prevent HIT IgG binding to activated platelets. We concluded that anti-PF4-heparin IgG is the component in these HIT plasmas that induces platelet aggregation. The Fab region of HIT IgG binds to PF4-heparin on the surface of activated platelets. We propose that only then does the Fc portion of the bound IgG further activate the same or adjacent platelets through the Fc receptor. Our data support a dynamic model of platelet activation in which released PF4 enhances further antibody binding and more release.     

Beneficial effect of exogenous platelet factor 4 for detecting pathogenic heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

The laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on an enzyme immunoassay combined with a functional test, and serotonin release assay (SRA) is the gold standard for detecting activating HIT antibodies. However, a recent atypical history of HIT prompted us to evaluate whether addition of platelet factor 4 (PF4) during SRA could improve its ability to detect pathogenic HIT antibodies. Using 5B9, a monoclonal antibody to PF4/H with a human Fc fragment, we first defined the optimal PF4 concentration for detecting low amounts of platelet‐activating IgG with SRA. Plasma samples from 50 patients with suspected HIT were then studied, and SRA was positive in 17 cases (Group SRA^pos), with relatively high levels of PF4‐specific IgG (median optical density = 2·66). SRA was also systematically performed after adding 10 μg/ml of PF4 in the reaction mixture, and significant serotonin release was measured with samples from 9 additional patients (Group PF4‐SRA^pos). Importantly, levels of PF4‐specific IgG were similar in these samples and those from the 24 persistently SRA negative patients. Moreover, the pre‐test probability of HIT was intermediate/high in all ‘SRA^pos’ or ‘SRA‐PF4^pos’ patients. In conclusion, addition of exogenous PF4 might improve the detection of pathogenic HIT antibodies by SRA.     

Serum antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex are an independent predictor of thrombotic complications following pediatric fontan surgery

Antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex (heparin/PF4) are linked to the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and to the thrombotic complications. We investigated thrombotic events during early follow-up in a pediatric cardiac surgical population to ascertain whether there is a relation between heparin/PF4 antibody concentration and post-surgical thrombotic complications. One hundred and five consecutive pediatric patients treated by Fontan surgery were studied. The presence of serum heparin/PF4 immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, and IgM (collectively termed HIT antibodies) were measured in preoperative and postoperative blood samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. On day six after Fontan surgery, HIT-related thromboses was identified in total of 11 patients (10.5%). HIT antibodies were detected in 34 of 105 patients (32.4%). The post-surgical nadir platelet count was significantly lower in patients who developed antibodies (p < 0.001). We found the odds ratio (OR) for this composite endpoint was 4.06 (p < 0.001). Seropositive status for heparin/PF4 antibodies was an independent predictor of thrombotic events (OR 2.28; p < 0.001). Quintile analysis revealed that the median nadir platelet value was significantly lower in patients with higher HIT antibody titers. Patients in the highest quintile of HIT antibody titer all experienced thrombotic events, while only two thrombotic events occurred in patients in the lowest quintile (p < 0.001). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare occurrence in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Patients who develop antibodies to the heparin/PF4 complex have a significantly higher rate of postoperative thrombotic events than patients who lack these antibodies. Within the seropositive group, the risk of developing thrombosis increased with the plasma antibody concentration.     

Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome without any proximate heparin exposure,infection, or inflammatory condition: Atypical clinical features with heparin-dependent platelet activating antibodies

Recent studies suggest that a thromboembolic disorder resembling heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), so-called spontaneous HIT syndrome, can occur in patients without any history of heparin exposure. It is likely due to anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion antibodies induced by other polyanions, such as bacterial surfaces and nucleic acids. We describe an atypical case of spontaneous HIT syndrome. A 70-year-old man suddenly presented with acute cerebral sinus thrombosis (CST). Soon after the initiation of unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of CST, his platelet count fell precipitously and he developed deep vein thrombosis, a clinical picture consistent with rapid-onset HIT but without any proximate episodes of heparin exposure, infection, trauma, surgery, or other acute illness. Antigen assays and a washed platelet activation assay indicated that the patient already possessed anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies with heparin-dependent platelet activation properties on admission. Cessation of UFH and initiation of argatroban resulted in prompt recovery of his platelet count without further thromboembolic events. We identified two similar cases in the literature. However, these patients do not meet the recently proposed criteria for spontaneous HIT syndrome. Even in atypical cases, however, inappropriate or delayed diagnosis of HIT appears to be associated with worse outcomes. We propose that these atypical cases should be included in the category of spontaneous HIT syndrome.     

Defining a second epitope for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis antibodies using KKO, a murine HIT-like monoclonal antibody

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (HIT/T) is a common complication of heparin therapy that is caused by antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexed with heparin. The immune response is polyclonal and polyspecific, ie, more than one neoepitope on PF4 is recognized by HIT/T antibodies. One such epitope has been previously identified; it involves the domain between the third and fourth cysteine residues in PF4 (site 1). However, the binding sites for other HIT/T antibodies remain to be defined. To explore this issue, the binding site of KKO, an HIT/T-like murine monoclonal antibody, was defined. KKO shares a binding site with many HIT/T antibodies on PF4/heparin, but does not bind to site 1 or recognize mouse PF4/heparin. Therefore, the binding of KKO to a series of mouse/human PF4 chimeras complexed with heparin was examined. KKO recognizes a site that requires both the N terminus of PF4 and Pro34, which immediately precedes the third cysteine. Both regions lie on the surface of the PF4 tetramer in sufficient proximity (within 0.74 nm) to form a contiguous antigenic determinant. The 10 of 14 HIT/T sera that require the N terminus of PF4 for antigen recognition also require Pro34 to bind. This epitope, termed site 2, lies adjacent to site 1 in the crystal structure of the PF4 tetramer. Yet sites 1 and 2 can be recognized by distinct populations of antibodies. These studies further help to define a portion of the PF4 tetramer to which self-reactive antibodies develop in patients exposed to heparin.     

Determinants of PF4/heparin immunogenicity

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated disorder that occurs with variable frequency in patients exposed to heparin. HIT antibodies preferentially recognize large macromolecular complexes formed between PF4 and heparin over a narrow range of molar ratios, but the biophysical properties of complexes that initiate antibody production are unknown. To identify structural determinants underlying PF4/heparin immunogenicity, we characterized the in vitro interactions of murine PF4 (mPF4) and heparin with respect to light absorption, size, and surface charge (zeta potential). We show that PF4/heparin macromolecular assembly occurs through colloidal interactions, wherein heparin facilitates the growth of complexes through charge neutralization. The size of PF4/heparin macromolecules is governed by the molar ratios of the reactants. Maximal complex size occurs at molar ratios of PF4/heparin at which surface charge is neutral. When mice are immunized with complexes that differ in size and/or zeta potential, antibody formation varies inversely with heparin concentration and is most robust in animals immunized with complexes displaying a net positive zeta-potential. These studies suggest that the clinical heterogeneity in the HIT immune response may be due in part to requirements for specific biophysical parameters of the PF4/heparin complexes that occur in settings of intense platelet activation and PF4 release.     

Laboratory testing for VITT antibodies

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a highly prothrombotic disorder that like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4). However, unlike HIT—where heparin at low concentrations (0.1-0.5 U/mL) typically enhances antibody-induced platelet activation, platelet activation by VITT sera is usually inhibited by heparin. Further, conventional platelet activation assays for HIT, such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test, often yield negative or atypical results when testing VITT sera. Nevertheless, VITT (like HIT) is a “clinical-pathological” disorder whereby laboratory detectability of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies is crucial for diagnosis. VITT antibodies follow 2 fundamental principles of HIT laboratory testing: (1) high probability of a positive PF4-dependent enzyme-immunoassay (EIA), and (2) high probability of a positive platelet activation assay. However, optimal detection of VITT in platelet activation assays requires the addition of PF4, for example, PF4-enhanced SRA (PF4-SRA) and PF4-enhanced HIPA (PIPA). A novel whole blood assay, called the PF4-induced flow cytometry-based platelet activation (PIFPA) assay, exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for VITT. HIT and VITT sera/plasmas differ in their reactivity in rapid HIT immunoassays (90-97% sensitivity for HIT, <25% sensitivity for VITT), consistent with distinct antigen sites on PF4 recognized by HIT and VITT antibodies.     

Laboratory tests for identification or exclusion of heparin induced thrombocytopenia: HIT or miss?

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially fatal condition that arises subsequent to formation of antibodies against complexes containing heparin, usually platelet‐factor 4‐heparin (“anti‐PF4‐heparin”). Assessment for HIT involves both clinical evaluation and, if indicated, laboratory testing for confirmation or exclusion, typically using an initial immunological assay (“screening”), and only if positive, a secondary functional assay for confirmation. Many different immunological and functional assays have been developed. The most common contemporary immunological assays comprise enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], chemiluminescence, lateral flow, and particle gel techniques. The most common functional assays measure platelet aggregation or platelet activation events (e.g., serotonin release assay; heparin‐induced platelet activation (HIPA); flow cytometry). All assays have some sensitivity and specificity to HIT antibodies, but differ in terms of relative sensitivity and specificity for pathological HIT, as well as false negative and false positive error rate. This brief article overviews the different available laboratory methods, as well as providing a suggested approach to diagnosis or exclusion of HIT.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: evaluation of IgG and IgGAM ELISA assays

Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare complication of heparin therapy resulting from antibody production to platelet factor 4 and heparin complexes (H‐PF4). Methods: We have evaluated four enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)‐based screening tests to identify the best assay(s) with the highest specificity but without underdiagnosis of HIT. As functional assays are difficult to perform, ELISAs are useful to provide clinicians with a timely answer. Over a 10‐month period, all samples (N = 107) referred to our laboratory were tested for HIT antibodies using four commercially available ELISA kits, two detecting IgG/A/M anti‐H‐PF4 antibodies and the other two IgG specific. Results: Twenty‐eight samples were positive by at least one assay; IgGAM ELISAs were found to be more sensitive with 24 samples positive by Asserachrom IgGAM and 23 by Zymutest IgGAM. Only 18 samples were positive by GTI‐PF4‐IgG and Zymutest IgG. The gold standard serotonin release assay (SRA) was used as a confirmation assay, and 11/28 samples tested positive. All these SRA‐positive samples were positive by all four assays. None of the IgGAM‐only‐positive samples was found to be positive by SRA suggesting a better specificity for the IgG‐only assays. Conclusion: Our data strongly support the use of IgG‐only assays for the detection of HIT antibodies.     

The role of platelet factor 4 in platelet aggregation induced by the antibodies implicated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe side effect of heparin treatment. Recent studies using immunological methods demonstrated that antibodies contained in plasma, or in purified total immunoglobulin (Ig)G from patients suffering HIT, recognize as target antigen the complex heparin/platelet factor (PF4). In the present study, the role of PF4 in in-vitro platelet aggregation induced by purified total IgG or platelet-poor plasma from patients suffering HIT was investigated. In order to demonstrate the functional role of PF4, an anti-PF4 antibody that specifically blocked PF4 was used. In an experimental system composed of washed platelet suspension, incubation of F(ab')2 fragments (0.125 microg/ml) of the polyclonal anti-PF4 antibody resulted in complete inhibition of platelet aggregation triggered by purified total IgG from patients suffering HIT and heparin. In platelet-rich plasma, a significantly higher concentration (4.25 microg/ml) of the anti-PF4 F(ab')2 was required to inhibit platelet aggregation induced by HIT-PPP and heparin. Intermediate concentrations of the anti-PF4 antibody partially inhibited platelet aggregation. In plasma milieu, the concentration of PF4 was about five-fold higher in comparison with that measured in the purified system. The intensity of platelet aggregation depended on the concentration of HIT-IgG. Platelet aggregation was abolished in the presence of high concentrations of heparin (superior or equal to 10 IU/ml). The present study shows that PF4 is essential for platelet aggregation triggered by the antibodies related to HIT in the presence of heparin. The concentration of PF4 that is available to bind with heparin or with the HIT-related antibodies is critical for platelet aggregation induced by HIT antibodies.