A comparison between low molecular weight heparin (KABI 2165) and standard heparin in the intravenous treatment of deep venous thrombosis

In order to study whether a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) of mw 4000 D is effective in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), patients with DVT verified by phlebography were randomized to treatment by continuous intravenous infusion of either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or LMWH. The initial dose was 240 U (anti F Xa)/kg/12 h. This study (study I) was stopped because of major bleeding in 2 newly operated patients in the LMWH group after 27 patients had been treated. The heparin activity measured as F Xa inhibition assayed in retrospect, was found to be much higher in the LMWH group (mean 1.6-2.0 anti F Xa U/ml) than in the UFH group (mean 0.5-0.8 anti F Xa U/ml). A second study was therefore initiated in which the DVT patients were randomly given UFH (240 U/kg/12 h) or LMWH only 120 U (anti F Xa)/kg/12 h, as initial doses (study II). In this study 27 patients could be evaluated, the mean heparin activity still being higher in the LMWH group (0.9-1.2 anti F Xa U/ml) than in the UFH group (0.5-0.7 anti F Xa U/ml). A second phlebographic investigation showed progression of thrombus size in 3 (11%) of the UFH patients of studies I and II (n = 29) and improvement in 14 (48%). There was no progression in any LMWH patient, 6 (50%) had improved in study I and 10 (77%) in study II. The mean decrease of thrombus size score (according to Marder) during treatment did not differ between the 3 groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Fixed-dose,body weight-independent subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin Certoparin compared with adjusted-dose intravenous unfractionated heparin in patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis

Subcutaneous body weight-adjusted low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been proven as effective and safe as intravenous aPTT-adjusted unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of patients with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In this study we evaluate the efficacy of the initial treatment of proximal DVT with a fixed-dose, body weight-independent application of the LMWH Certoparin with a six month follow-up. In a prospective, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled study 1220 patients with objectively diagnosed proximal DVT were randomly assigned to subcutaneous 8000 U anti-factor Xa of Certoparin twice daily for 10 to 14 days or intravenous aPTT-adjusted UFH for 5 to 8 days. Both regimen were followed by oral anticoagulation for 6 months. The primary end point was the rate of symptomatic and objectively confirmed thromboembolic events within 6 months. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Certoparin regimen as compared to UFH. The per-protocol analysis revealed 22 (3.8%) thromboembolic events in the Certoparin group and 24 (4.3%) in patients assigned to UFH within 6 months, thereby proving the non-inferiority (p<0.01), confirmed by intent-to-treat analysis (p<0.001). Major bleeding occurred in 6 and 7 patients started on Certoparin or UFH during the treatment period. Thromboembolic events were equally distributed in body weight categories with < 50, 50-80 and >80 kg as followed: 0, 3.6% and 4.1% of patients for the Certoparin group and 0, 4.6% and 4.2% of patients for the UFH group. The same was true for major bleeding complications with 0, 2.9% and 1.5% for Certoparin and 0, 3.5% and 4.2% for UFH. Overall mortality was 1.9% in the Certoparin group and 2.7% in the UFH group. Fixed-dose body weight-independent subcutaneous LMWH Certoparin is at least as efficacious and safe as intravenous aPTT-adjusted UFH for the initial treatment of acute proximal DVT. This effect is maintained during a 6-months follow-up of treatment with oral anticoagulation.     

Antithrombin III in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis during heparin treatment (subcutaneous and intravenous) and during and after treatment with oral coumarins

The antithrombin III (AT-III) concentration was studied in 98 patients with symptomatic acute deep-vein thrombosis. All patients were initially treated with heparin randomly by subcutaneous injections or by continuous infusions. Then the patients were treated with coumarins during one or six months. The AT-III concentration was estimated daily during heparin treatment and repeatedly during the first year. The mean AT-III concentration decreased progressively 25% during 5 days of heparin treatment regardless of whether heparin was given intravenously or subcutaneously. The mean AT-III concentration during coumarin treatment was higher than after coumarin treatment. Eleven patients developed recurrent thromboembolic episodes during the follow-up period. The mean AT-III concentration in these patients was not lower than in the patients without recurrences.     

Optimal dosing of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis

Twice-daily, inpatient, subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is at least as effective and safe as continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin therefore may be suitable for outpatient treatment of deep vein thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to develop a dosing nomogram for a dose each 12 hours (2 doses per day) 12-hourly subcutaneous unfractionated heparin that is suitable for outpatient treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis. A cohort study was performed in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis in two phases. In both phases, the first subcutaneous loading dose of unfractionated heparin was 317 U/kg, and the second dose was 231 U/kg. The activated partial thromboplastin time was measured daily, 6 hours after the morning injection, and subsequent doses of unfractionated heparin were adjusted according to a nomogram, which was modified for phase II. Warfarin was started with unfractionated heparin. In phase I (14 outpatients), activated partial thromboplastin time results were frequently subtherapeutic (9:14) the day after starting unfractionated heparin (day 1), and were frequently supratherapeutic (27:40) after the first 2 days of unfractionated heparin therapy. In phase II (21 patients), to explain the frequently subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time results that were obtained on day 1, the activated partial thromboplastin time results were measured after the initial loading dose. Mean activated partial thromboplastin time results of 86 and 61 seconds were obtained 6 and 12 hours after this dose, suggesting that 317 U/kg is a suitable subcutaneous loading dose. In contrast to phase I, in phase II, unfractionated heparin dose was not increased on day 1 in response to a low activated partial thromboplastin time result. This reduced the frequency of supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time results during the early days of therapy without increasing the frequency of subtherapeutic results. Warfarin therapy had a substantal effect on the activated partial thromboplastin time that appeared to account for a high frequency of supratherapeutic results during the later days of unfractionated heparin therapy; the activated partial thromboplastin time increased by 20 seconds (95% CI, 14–27 seconds) with each increase in the International Normalized Ratio of 1.0. We had limited success at developing a dosing nomogram for subcutaneous unfractionated heparin that reliably achieved activated partial thromboplastin time results within the therapeutic range. However, as oral anticoagulants directly increased activated partial thromboplastin time results, we suggest that adjusting unfractionated heparin dose to achieve prespecified activated partial thromboplastin time results may not be appropriate in patients who are receiving concomitant warfarin therapy.     

Fixed-dose, body weight-independent subcutaneous LMW heparin versus adjusted dose unfractionated intravenous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. EASTERN Investigators

BACKGROUND: Body weight-adjusted subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been proven to be at least as effective and safe as dose-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. However, body weight-adjusted dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin may be cumbersome and could lead possibly to incorrect dosing. Therefore a fixed LMWH dose, independent of body-weight, might rationalize initial treatment for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: Patients with proven proximal deep-vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH Certoparin (8,000 anti-factor Xa U b.i.d.; 265 patients) or to adjusted dose i.v. UFH (273 patients) for 12 days. Vitamin K antagonists were started between day 3 and 7 and continued for up to 6 months. The primary outcome measure was a 30 percent or greater improvement in the Marder Score, as revealed by repeated venography on day 12 (end of the initial treatment). The secondary composite outcome measure included death, recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding and was assessed at day 12 and after 6 months by a blinded adjunction committee. RESULTS: The Marder score improved by 30% or more in 30.3% and 25.0% of patients assigned to LMWH (198 paired venograms) and UFH (192 paired venograms), respectively (2p = 0.26). At the end of the initial treatment, the composite outcome was observed in 4 of the 265 patients (1.5%) randomized to LMWH, as compared with 14 of the 273 patients (5.1%) randomized to UFH (2p = 0.03). At 6 months these figures were 6.8% and 12.8%, respectively (risk reduction 0.53, confidence interval 0.31-0.90, 2p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH certoparin is at least as efficacious as UFH in resolving proximal vein thrombosis.     

Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy

Low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparins have been shown to be at least as effective as unfractionated (UF) heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in nonpregnant subjects. LMW heparins have been shown to be safe when used during pregnancy as they do not cross the placenta. Up to now, they have been used mainly in thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and rarely in the treatment of acute DVT in pregnant women. In a prospective observational study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of the LMW heparin, dalteparin, with UF heparin in the initial treatment (first week) of DVT during pregnancy. After confirmation of DVT by ultrasonography, 10 women were treated with UF heparin (25,430 IU/day, mean) and 21 women with dalteparin (16,000 IU/day, mean) for 7 days and, thereafter, all women were given treatment doses of LMW heparin for another 2 weeks. The dose was then gradually decreased and kept at a high prophylactic dose until delivery. One patient in the dalteparin group had recurrence of DVT 2 weeks after starting the treatment. No differences were observed between the groups in symptoms or bleeding complications during pregnancy and delivery. Our results indicate that LMW heparin is as effective and safe as UF heparin for the first week of treatment, but LMW heparin has the advantage of being easily administered and few laboratory controls are required.     

Subcutaneous vs intravenous heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis--a randomized clinical trial

271 patients with acute symptomatic deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs, confirmed by strain-gauge plethysmography and/or venography, were randomly assigned to receive intermittent subcutaneous heparin calcium or heparin sodium by continuous intravenous infusion for 6-10 days. Heparin dosage was adjusted to maintain activated partial thromboplastin time values (Thrombofax reagent) at 1.3-1.9 times the basal ones. Strain-gauge plethysmography was repeated at the end of heparin treatment, and evaluation of therapy was performed by comparing the indexes of venous hemodynamics and by assessing the incidence of pulmonary embolism and of bleeding complications. In the intravenous group, Maximal Venous Outflow (MVO) increased from 20.8 +/- 12.8 to 28.4 +/- 17.5 ml/min per 100 ml of tissue and Venous Capacitance (VC) from 1.39 +/- 0.92 to 1.94 +/- 1.0 ml/100 ml of tissue (mean +/- SD). In the subcutaneous group, MVO increased from 21.0 +/- 12.7 to 27.5 +/- 18.1 and VC from 1.60 +/- 0.86 to 2.06 +/- 1.0. The median improvement of MVO and VC were 22% and 36% respectively in the IV group and 20% and 24% in the SC group. Clinical pulmonary embolism occurred in 2 patients in the intravenous group (1 fatal) and in 4 in the subcutaneous group (1 fatal). 9 major bleeding complications occurred in the intravenous group (1 fatal) and 5 in the subcutaneous group (1 fatal). The differences were not significant at the statistical analysis. The results suggest that subcutaneous intermittent heparin has a comparable efficacy to continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. To the same conclusion points an overview of the seven randomized trials which compared these treatment modalities.     

Exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with D-dimer testing--comparison of 13 D-dimer methods in 99 outpatients suspected of deep venous thrombosis using venography as reference standard

In a direct assay comparison we evaluated the diagnostic performance of 10 novel D-Dimer assays for the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In addition, 3 conventional ELISA D-Dimer assays were included as reference tests. The study was performed in 99 consecutive outpatients referred to the emergency department for clinical suspicion of DVT. Venography was used as reference standard and demonstrated the presence of DVT in 50 patients (6 patients with isolated distal DVT and 44 patients with proximal DVT). The qualitative D-Dimer assays Minutex and SimpliRED and the quantitative BC DD showed overall sensitivities (for proximal and distal DVT) of only 80-83% with specificities that ranged from 87 to 94%. Overall sensitivity was 94% for the qualitative INSTANT I.A. and 98% for the quantitative Turbiquant at a cut-off level equal to the detection limit. Using different cut-off levels a sensitivity of 100% for proximal DVT and for proximal as well as distal DVT could be obtained for NycoCard, IL DD, Liatest, Tinaquant and VIDAS D-Dimer assays with specificities that ranged from 31% (NycoCard) to 71% (VIDAS) for proximal DVT and from 12% (NycoCard) to 47% (IL DD) for overall DVT. At a cut-off level equal to the upper limit of the reference range only Tinaquant and VIDAS showed a sensitivity of 100% for proximal as well as for distal DVT with a specificity of 39% and 41% respectively. The results of this study suggest that the VIDAS and Tinaquant D-Dimer assays have the highest sensitivity for the exclusion of DVT in outpatients. In outpatients that have a low or moderate pretest probability for DVT, these tests may be used in management studies where anticoagulation is withheld on the basis of D-Dimer testing alone.     

Risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in bedridden or wheelchair-bound multiple sclerosis patients: A prospective study

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) often causes progressive loss of mobility, leading to limb paralysis. Venous and lymphatic stasis is a risk condition for venous thromboembolism (VTE). There is, however, no data on the frequency of VTE complicating the progression of MS. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with late-stage MS attending a neurology center for rehabilitation.

Patients and Methods

A total of 132 patients with MS were enrolled, 87 women and 45 men, mean age 58 ± 11 years. The disease had started on average 18.7 years before; patients reported 9.6 hours bedridden per day or 14.3 hours wheelchair-bound. Only 25 patients reported a residual ability to walk alone or with help. Lower limb edema was present in 113 patients, bilateral in 41 cases. At admission all patients underwent extended compression ultrasonography. Their plasma D-dimer levels were measured. No antithrombotic prophylaxis was given.

Results

DVT was found in 58 patients (43.9%); 32 had a history of VTE. Forty of these patients (69%) had chronic lower limb edema, in 19 cases bilateral. D-dimer levels in the DVT patients were significantly higher than in patients without DVT (553 ± 678 vs. 261 ± 152 ng/mL, p = 0.0112, Mann-Whitney Test). Nearly half the DVT patients (26, 45%) had high D-dimer levels (701 ± 684 ng/mL). Of the 74 patients without DVT, 48 had normal D-dimer (193.37 ± 67.28 ng/mL) and 26 high (387.61 ± 187.42 ng/mL).

Conclusions

The frequency of DVT in late-stage MS may be over 40%. The long history of the disease means the onset of each episode cannot be established with certainty. A number of patients with positive CUS findings had negative D-dimer values, suggesting a VTE event in the past. However, the level of DVT risk in this series should lead physicians to consider the systematic application of long-term preventive measures.     

Fragmin once or twice daily subcutaneously in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of the leg.

In an open, randomised controlled study, 101 patients with phlebographically diagnosed deep vein thrombosis of the leg, not extending into more than two thirds of the femoral vein, were randomised to receive Fragmin (a low molecular weight heparin) administered subcutaneously either once or twice daily in doses of 200 U(anti-FXa)/kg/24h or 100 U(anti-FXa)/kg/12h respectively. Prior to Fragmin unfractionated heparin had been administered by continuous iv infusion for not longer than 24h. Warfarin was administered from the first treatment day. Fragmin was administered for at least 5 days or until the prothrombin complex had been within the therapeutic range for at least 2 days. Patients were kept in bed for the first day but thereafter were ambulant. Phlebography was repeated at 5-7 days. Comparison of the phlebograms revealed a similar improvement (reduction in Marder score) in both groups. There were 5 cases of bleeding: 1 major and 3 minor in the twice daily group and 1 minor bleed in the once daily group. There were no cases of clinical pulmonary embolism. It is concluded that Fragmin, administered as a single daily subcutaneous injection, is effective in the treatment of deep vein thromboses, and offers the advantages of reduced costs, despite higher price of the drug, including reduced nursing time.     

Markers of hemostatic system activation during treatment of deep vein thrombosis with subcutaneous unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin

Prothrombin fragments (F1+2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D-dimers, markers of hemostatic system activation, were measured in 59 consecutive patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients were randomly treated either with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UH) administered in two to three subcutaneous doses adjusted to activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (dalteparin) administered in a fixed dose of 200 IU/kg body weight in one subcutaneous injection daily. Before treatment, F1+2, TAT and D-dimer were above the cut-off level in 27/59 (46%), 34/59 (58%) and all (100%) patients, respectively. Significant associations were observed between F1+2 and TAT (r=.66, P<.001), TAT and D-dimer (r=.36, P<.005) and F1+2 and D-dimer (r=.30, P<.050). On the third day of treatment, F1+2 and TAT significantly decreased to reference values in almost all patients (in 64/66 determinations of both F1+2 and TAT) and remained low on the seventh day of treatment. Compared to pretreatment values, a nonsignificant decrease of D-dimer was noted in both groups, but all values remained above the cut-off value. When markers of hemostatic system activation in the UH and LMWH groups were compared, no significant differences were observed. It was concluded that subcutaneous UH in an APTT-adjusted dose and subcutaneous LMWH in a once-daily weight-adjusted dose controlled these markers of hemostatic system activation in a similar manner.     

Subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin versus subcutaneous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a Polish multicenter trial.

In a prospective multicenter trial, 149 consecutive patients with phlebographically proven proximal and/or distal deep vein thrombosis of the leg were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneously for 10 days either low molecular weight heparin CY 216 (Fraxiparine) in a fixed dose or unfractionated heparin (UFH) in doses adjusted according to the activated partial thromboplastin time. Pre- and post-treatment phlebograms were assessed blindly using the Arnesen's score system in 134 patients available for analysis of the treatment efficacy. The mean phlebographic score after 10 days of treatment was significantly decreased in both groups (p less than 0.001) in comparison with the baseline score but the difference in score changes between the two groups was not statistically significant. There was an improvement in 45/68 patients (66%) in the Fraxiparine group and in 32/66 patients (48%) in the UFH group, and an increase in the thrombus size in 10/68 (15%) and 12/66 (18%), respectively. One symptomatic non-fatal pulmonary embolism and one major bleeding episode were observed in the UFH group. During a follow-up period of 3 months, two rethromboses had occurred in the UFH group and none in the Fraxiparine group. It is concluded that subcutaneous fixed dose Fraxiparine is safe and at least as effective as subcutaneous adjusted UFH in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.     

A pilot study; desmopressin (DDAVP) in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis

In a pilot study on 9 patients with acute deep venous thrombosis of the leg the fibrinolytic response and the possible thrombolytic effect of desmopressin (DDAVP), when given supplementary to standard heparin treatment, was examined. Six injections of 0.3-0.4 microgram DDAVP/kg b.w. at 12 hours intervals were given. No serious side effects were observed. The fibrinolytic variables that followed showed that plasma levels of t-PA increased significantly and most pronounced after the first injection. Rephlebography 4-7 days after hospitalization showed partial thrombolysis in 7 out of 9 patients. The phlebographic score according to Marder was reduced from 22.7 +/- 12.1 to 18.4 +/- 10.1 (p = 0.018), corresponding to a thrombus size reduction of 19%. No correlation between the level of the fibrinolytic variables measured and the degree of thrombolysis in the individual patients, could be demonstrated in this small number of patients.     

Subcutaneous treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin. A dose finding study with LMWH-Novo

Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH-Novo, Logiparin) was carried out with two different doses of Logiparin, 75 XaI U/kg b.w. twice daily and 150 XaI U/kg b.w. once daily subcutaneously for 5 days. Simultaneously warfarin was given from the first day of heparin treatment. Mean age of the twenty patients was 65 years and one third was females. No serious side effects, hematomas, pulmonary emboli or signs of recurrent thrombosis occurred during treatment with either dose regime. Venografic assessment with Marder scoring one week after initiation of Logiparin treatment showed a slight not significant improvement apparent in 40 % of the patients. The activities of F-IIaI and F-XaI in the blood plasma were found to increase after injection of Logiparin. These two parameters seem to be the most suitable for monitoring the effect during treatment. For future studies on the therapeutic effect of Logiparin in deep venous thrombosis a single dose of 150 to 200 F-XaI activity per 24 hours seems to be most suitable.     

Prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis by a combination of subcutaneous heparin with subcutaneous dihydroergotamine or oral sulphinpyrazone

In a randomized clinical trial the effect of subcutaneous heparin alone or in combination with dihydroergotamine or sulphinpyrazone in preventing postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was studied. Sodium heparin (5000 IU) was administered subcutaneously twice daily; dihydroergotamine (1/2 mg) was also administered subcutaneously twice daily, and sulphinpyrazone (400 mg) was administered orally or intravenously twice daily. Administration occurred for at least 7 days. The diagnosis DVT was made with the radiofibrinogen uptake test. 358 patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were allocated to three treatment groups: heparin alone (Hep), heparin + dihydroergotamine (DHE-Hep) and heparin + sulphinpyrazone (Sulph-Hep). The frequency of DVT was 14/114 in Hep, 10/115 in DHE-Hep and 20/114 in Sulph-Hep. These differences were not significant. After application of the "logistic regression" procedure of Cox (1) it turned out that the major risk factors for developing DVT were age, sex, weight, type of operation and presence of diabetes mellitus. Also a significant treatment influence was observed (p = 0.001). This treatment effect was most probably due to improvement in the DHE-Hep group. The results in the Sulph-Hep group were not significantly different from those in the Hep group. A risk index was formulated on the basis of the above mentioned risk factors by which the chance of occurrence of DVT during heparin prophylaxis in an individual patient could be predicted. Patients that should receive additional prophylactic treatment can be defined by using this risk index.     

Prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in non-surgical patients at hospital admission

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is known as a common complication in surgical and non-surgical patients. We hypothesized that according to the underlying risk factors and the acute illness, the prevalence ofVTE in non-surgical patients admitted to hospital is widely underestimated. For three months each patient admitted to the department of internal medicine with an acute illness, but without known deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was investigated by ultrasound compression sonography. Patients' history, risk factors and extent of immobilisation were documented. In patients with newly detected DVT D-dimer and fibrinogen were measured as well as computer tomography scans performed. Follow-up investigations of the DVT population were performed at four weeks and three months. Six hundred seventeen patients (49.3% men) were included. In 16 patients (men = 7) a previously unknown thrombosis (2.6%) was detected, mainly in patients with acute cardio-pulmonary disease (56%) and the elderly (mean age 75.6 years). Eight patients had femoro-popliteal (50.0%), four a femoral (25.0%), and four a popliteal vein thrombosis (25.0%). Five had pulmonary embolism (31.3%). In patients with DVT D-dimer was 875 +/- 1,228 mg/l, fibrinogen 568 +/- 215 mg/dl and C-reactive-protein 58.54 +/- 73.65 mg/dl. One patient died from sepsis during hospitalisation, one died from sudden cardiac death at home. None of the other 14 surviving patients relapsed. The study shows a 2.6% risk for DVT in outpatients with acute illness admitted to the department of internal medicine. These data demonstrate the high risk of DVT is in non-surgical patients. Early prophylaxis has to be considered in internal medicine patients especially in the elderly.     

Effects of low-dose subcutaneous heparin on the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with ischemic stroke

The effectiveness of low-dose subcutaneous heparin in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in patients with ischemic stroke was investigated in an unblinded controlled study. The frequency of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in the control group was 23% versus 2% in the patients receiving heparin. There were no bleeding complications in the test group and there were no differences in the occurrence of hemorrhage changes in the cerebral ischemic infarction in both groups.     

Characteristics of women with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) during the MORE trial

Background: Raloxifene (RLX) increases the risk of DVT/PE by ∼ 3-fold in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial. Methods: Postmenopausal (PM) women with osteoporosis were randomized to RLX 60 or 120 mg/d, or placebo (PL; n=7705) and treated for ≤4 years. Women adjudicated with serious adverse events of DVT/PE were assessed for known DVT/PE risks. Results: In all, 64 PM women had a DVT/PE: 44 DVT, 14 PE, 6 both DVT/PE. Sixty-nine percent of events were in women who had ≥1 additional risk: 53% had concurrent immobilization (25% major surgery, 14% hospitalization >3 days without surgery, 8% trauma/fracture limb, 6% longhaul flight) and 27% had hypercoagulable state (9% advanced cancer, 11% history of DVT/PE, 8% genetic variant) [RLX v PL, overall P >0.7]). No deaths caused by DVT/PE were attributed to RLX. Of the 6 RLX-treated women who had a recurrent DVT/PE during the trial, 5 had this event in the first 13 months. During the first 2 years when most events occurred, 9% and 6% of RLX-treated women were on chronic aspirin and statins, respectively versus 0% and 0% for PL. Twenty-nine percent of RLX- and 56% of PL-treated women used estrogen previously. Conclusion: Most PM women with DVT/PE in the MORE trial had ongoing risk factors for DVT/PE, including immobilization and hypercoagulable state. Whether treatment with statins or aspirin reduces occurrence of DVT/PE while on RLX therapy requires further study.     

Low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus oral anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol) in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the elderly: a randomized trial

This study aims to establish the relative effectiveness and safety of low molecular weight heparin in elderly patients with venous thrombosis in order to find an alternative to oral anticoagulant therapy with less bleeding complications in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). One hundred consecutive elderly patients (>75 years old) with venographically demonstrated proximal DVT were included in a randomized trial. All patients were treated for ten days with adjusted doses of intravenous heparin. Informed consent was obtained and on the eight day, patients were randomly allocated to receive acenocoumarol (INR 2.0-3.0) or subcutaneous enoxaparin (4000 anti-Xa units once a day) for three months. All patients were followed-up clinically and venographically for a one year period. The results were analyzed with Fisher's exact test or chi-square test as appropriate. During the treatment and surveillance period, 6 of the 50 patients (12%) who received acenocoumarol and 8 of the 50 patients (16%) who received enoxaparin had new episodes of venous thromboembolism confirmed by objective testing (p = 0.6; 95% CI for the difference: -19.5 to 11.5). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in six of the 50 patients (12%) who received acenocoumarol and in one (2%) of those on enoxaparin (p = 0.1; 95% CI for the difference: -1.8 to 21.8). Vertebral fractures developed in 2 patients (4%) in the enoxaparin group (p = 0.5; 95% CI for the difference: -11.4 to 3.4). These results show that fixed dose enoxaparin seems to be effective and safe in the long-term treatment of proximal DVT in the elderly. In comparison with oral anticoagulants, the findings are inconclusive due to the wide confidence intervals for differences between outcomes, however they suggest that the former may have less bleeding complications with similar efficacy.