Urologic approaches to metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The treatment of choice for nondisseminated disease is surgery. However, the 5-year survival rates for all stages do not exceed 60%, even in contemporary series. Further improvement will most likely have to await the development of a more effective systemic therapy and the application of combined treatment modalities to counter the relatively high number of patients presenting with advanced stages. Treatment options in metastatic disease include nephrectomy alone, sometimes in combination with metastasectomy in selected cases, or cytoreductive surgery followed by immunotherapy. Alternatively, one may apply immunotherapy initially and perform adjuvant nephrectomy in the case of a response, or proceed with immunotherapy as a monotherapy. Nevertheless, long-term survival rates range merely from 5 to 10%, depending strongly on patient selection criteria. Concepts and progress in this field appear to be of major interest for modern urooncologists following the advent of immunotherapeutic strategies that require a surgical intervention at some stage of the treatment cascade.     

Immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

In 1992, high-dose bolus interleukin (IL)-2 was granted Food and Drug Administration approval based on its ability to produce durable complete responses in a small number of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the substantial toxicity and limited efficacy that is associated with IL-2 has narrowed its application to highly selected patients treated at specialized centers. In recent years, the relative merits of low- and high-dose cytokine regimens have been clarified by the results of 4 randomized trials. Taken together, these studies suggest that high-dose IV bolus IL-2 is superior in terms of response rate and possibly response quality to regimens that involve either low-dose IL-2 and interferon-alpha, intermediate- or low-dose IL-2 alone, or low-dose interferon-alpha alone. More significantly, investigations associated with these trials suggest that the potential exists for identifying predictors of response (or resistance) and limiting IL-2 therapy to those most likely to benefit. The Cytokine Working Group has launched the high-dose IL-2 "select" trial to determine, in a prospective fashion, if the predictive model proposed by Atkins et al. can identify a group of patients with advanced RCC who are significantly more likely to respond to high dose IL-2-based therapy ("good" risk) than a historical, unselected patient population. For patients unlikely to benefit from IL-2, are unable to receive it or who progress after IL-2, the emergence of molecularly targeted therapies offers hope for improved clinical outcome. As the list of effective therapies for metastatic RCC grows, improvements in patient selection and more "targeted" approaches will be required to optimize the benefits of cytokine therapy in metastatic RCC.     

Predictors of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The high rate of incidence of skeletal complications in women with metastatic breast carcinoma appears to contribute significantly to their morbidity. Although recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of bisphosphonates in preventing skeletal complications in selected patients, to the authors' knowledge the incidence rate of skeletal complications in an unselected population of women with metastatic breast carcinoma is unknown. The current study was designed to examine the incidence rate of skeletal complications in a large unselected group of women with metastatic breast carcinoma to determine predictors of these complications. METHODS: All women (n = 718) diagnosed with metastatic breast carcinoma between 1981-1991 at the study institution were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Greater than 50% of the women developed skeletal complications; among these women, 51% had > 1 complication. Approximately 80% of those with bone-limited disease at the time of diagnosis developed complications, as did 60% of those with bone and visceral disease and 21% of those with no bone disease. By univariate analysis, the site of initial metastatic disease, abnormal alkaline phosphatase, and a disease free interval of < 3 years were predictive of skeletal complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that bone involvement at the time of diagnosis was predictive of subsequent skeletal complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective study with extensive follow-up, skeletal complications were extremely common and repetitive, although complications predated patient death by >/= 1 year in the group of women presenting with any bone disease. The presence of bone disease at the time of initial presentation was predictive of skeletal complications. In this group of patients, the authors were unable to identify a subgroup with a low rate of skeletal complications.     

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Purpose  To review the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including the use of new targeted therapies. Methods  A search of MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008) and American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting abstracts (2005 to May 2008) was preformed using the search terms bevacizumab, everolimus, interferon-alfa (IFN-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, and RCC. Articles most pertinent to the treatment of metastatic RCC are reviewed. Results  The treatment of metastatic RCC has undergone a paradigm shift over the past 5 years from biologic response modifiers to new targeted therapies. Historically, response rates for the biological response modifiers, aldesleukin (IL-2), and IFN-α were approximately 15%. Recently, three targeted agents, sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus have been approved for the treatment of RCC. Additionally, bevacizumab has been investigated and shown to increase progression free survival in RCC. IL-2 remains the only agent to induce complete, durable remissions; however, many patients are not eligible for this therapy. Newer agents (sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus) have shown to be superior to IFN-α or placebo and bevacizumab combined with IFN-α has shown activity when compared to IFN-α alone. Unlike IL-2, the greatest benefit obtained with targeted therapies is in achieving stable disease (SD). Despite their benefit, targeted therapies have never been compared with each other in clinical trials and choosing the most appropriate agent remains challenging. To date, the optimal sequence or combination of treatments has not been defined; however, everolimus has recently demonstrated activity in patients progressing on targeted therapy. Conclusions  IL-2 remains the most active regimen in inducing complete responses; however, its use is accompanied by substantial morbidity and is limited to those with a good performance status. Targeted therapies are also efficacious in the treatment of RCC, with the major benefit being induction of SD. Future research will better define the sequencing of therapies, as well as, explore the activity of novel combination regimens.     

The role of pharmacogenomics in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Pharmacogenomics is the study of how variation in the genetic background affects an individual's response to a specific drug and/or its metabolism. Using knowledge about the genes which produce the enzymes that metabolize a specific drug, a physician may decide to raise or lower the dose, or even change to a different drug. Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors has led to a substantial improvement in the standard of care for patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although few studies have identified biomarkers that predict the response of targeted drugs in the treatment of metastatic RCC, some associations have been found. Several studies have identified genetic polymorphisms with implications in the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of TKIs and mTOR inhibitors and which are associated with a prolonged progression-free survival and/or overall survival in patients with metastatic RCC. Among the genes of interest, we should consider IL8, FGFR2, VEGFA, FLT4, and NR1I2. In this review, we discuss single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with outcome and toxicity following targeted therapies and provide recommendations for future trials to facilitate the use of SNPs in personalized therapy for this disease.     

Interferon in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) represents an immunoresponsive malignancy in individual patients. Interferons (IFNs) have thus been broadly investigated in this cancer type, with the most commonly used being recombinant IFN-alpha. The average response rate is 15%, with a response duration of 4 to 6 months. Complete responses are rare (< or =5%), but may be long-lasting. Responses are seen predominantly in lung and lymph node metastases. Subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) doses of 9 to 10 x 10(6) U/d or 9 to 18 x 10(6) U thrice weekly are most often used. Flu-like symptoms (fever, myalgia, asthenia) occur in almost all patients treated with IFN-alpha and may be dose-limiting. The combination of IFN-alpha with vinblastine is not superior to IFN monotherapy. Phase III studies have demonstrated a modest survival benefit for IFN-alpha therapy as compared with placebo-equivalent treatment, with a survival gain of 3 to 7 months. Predictive for beneficial outcome are an excellent performance status, low sedimentation rate, no weight loss, and long interval between initial diagnosis and start of IFN treatment. The significance of nephrectomy is currently being investigated in phase III studies. IFN-gamma has no major therapeutic role in MRCC. IFN-beta and "natural IFN" are equally effective as IFN-alpha. In conclusion, IFN-alpha represents the standard treatment in patients with MRCC who are candidates for systemic therapy. Any IFN-alpha-containing combination treatment is investigational (eg, with interleukins or retinoids).     

Nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Opinion statement Patients presenting with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) face a dismal prognosis, with a median survival time of only 6 to 12 months and a 2-year survival rate of 10% to 20%. RCC is notoriously chemorefractory, and immunotherapy is associated with total response rates of less than 20% and complete response rates of less than 5%. Therefore, surgery has continued to play a prominent role in the management of patients with metastatic RCC. Recent randomized prospective trials suggest a survival advantage for cytoreductive nephrectomy, and some patients with advanced RCC may also achieve palliation. Patients with limited and resectable metastases should be considered for combined nephrectomy and metastasectomy. The other main option for patients with advanced RCC is systemic immunotherapy followed by assessment for surgical consolidation, but responses in the primary tumor are uncommon and results with this pathway have not been encouraging. Tumor embolization can be a valuable palliative adjunct for some patients with metastatic RCC. Cytoreductive nephrectomy represents the most aggressive pathway for patients with metastatic RCC. Although cytoreductive nephrectomy can extend survival by approximately 50% for many patients, it can be associated with morbidity and delay in administration of systemic therapy. Therefore, patient selection, taking into account performance status and sites and burden of disease, which are well-established prognostic factors for patients with metastatic RCC, is of paramount importance in managing this challenging group of patients.     

Sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Sunitinib is an orally available, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor licensed for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This article is an in-depth review of the mechanism of action of sunitinib, rationale for dose and schedule, toxicity and clinical efficacy. Other targeted therapies and treatment combinations for renal cell carcinoma are discussed. The use of sunitinib for other indications, biomarkers of response and future directions are explored.     

Multimodality treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of choice for nondisseminated disease is surgery. However, the 5-year survival rates for all stages do not exceed 60%, even in contemporary series. Further improvement will most likely have to await the development of a more effective systemic therapy and the application of combined treatment modalities to counter the relatively high number of patients presenting with advanced stages. Treatment options in metastatic disease include nephrectomy, sometimes in combination with metastasectomy in selected cases, alone or cytoreductive surgery followed by immunotherapy. Alternatively, one may initially apply immunotherapy and perform adjuvant nephrectomy in the case of a response, or proceed to immunotherapy as a monotherapy. Nevertheless, long-term survival ranges from merely 5 to 10% depending strongly on patient selection criteria. Concepts and progress in this field appear to be of major interest for modern uro-oncologists following the advent of immunotherapeutic strategies that require a surgical intervention at some stage of the treatment cascade.     

Multimodality treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of choice for nondisseminated disease is surgery. However, the 5-year survival rates for all stages do not exceed 60%, even in contemporary series. Further improvement will most likely have to await the development of a more effective systemic therapy and the application of combined treatment modalities to counter the relatively high number of patients presenting with advanced stages. Treatment options in metastatic disease include nephrectomy, sometimes in combination with metastasectomy in selected cases, alone or cytoreductive surgery followed by immunotherapy. Alternatively, one may initially apply immunotherapy and perform adjuvant nephrectomy in the case of a response, or proceed to immunotherapy as a monotherapy. Nevertheless, long-term survival ranges from merely 5 to 10% depending strongly on patient selection criteria. Concepts and progress in this field appear to be of major interest for modern uro-oncologists following the advent of immunotherapeutic strategies that require a surgical intervention at some stage of the treatment cascade.     

转移性肾癌的靶向治疗

转移性肾癌是一种对于传统化、放疗较不敏感的不可治愈性疾病。虽然免疫治疗对部分患者具一定疗效，但疗效通常并不持久，且治疗可能导致严重的毒副作用。随着近年来对肾癌生物学及分子发病机制的加深理解，针对使用多种靶向治疗药物治疗肾癌的研究取得了可喜的成果。无论针对初治或以往治疗失败的患者，靶向治疗均显示出高于传统治疗的优越性。此外，治疗的耐受性非常良好，并不影响患者的生存质量。本综述将依据最新的临床证据，着重围绕目前主要的治疗进展加以分别阐述，同时简单概括相关的治疗靶点信息，力求使读者在基础和临床两方面对转移性肾癌的靶向治疗获得较为深刻的认识。     

Contemporary treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma is the 14th most common cancer worldwide. It is a heterogeneous group of histopathological entities, of which the most common is clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Approximately 20–30% of patients present initially with metastatic disease and an additional 20% will progress after radical surgical treatment. Metastatic disease that is non-feasible for surgical treatment remains incurable. Numerous studies have demonstrated that—with the introduction of new drugs—the treatment outcomes of metastatic disease have improved. The development of new therapies as well as the optimization and individualization of procedures allow us to hope for further progress in this area.     

Antitumor effect of sunitinib against skeletal metastatic renal cell carcinoma through inhibition of osteoclast function

We investigated the inhibitory effect of sunitinib, a newly approved multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, against the progression of renal cell cancer (RCC) bone metastases in vivo. In vitro cell proliferation was determined using the MTS assay. To investigate the inhibitory effects of sunitinib in vivo, we established luciferase-labeled ACHN(Luc) cells derived from papillary RCC. Mice in which ACHN(Luc) cells had been transplanted into the left ventricle to establish bone metastases were treated orally with 40 mg/kg/day sunitinib or vehicle control for 3 weeks. Growth of the cancer cells was monitored using an in vivo imaging system. In addition, 16 patients with metastatic RCC were treated with sunitinib, and serum and urine levels of amino-terminal telopeptide (NTx) were measured as markers of bone resorption. Sunitinib did not inhibit the growth of RCC cells in vitro at clinically or experimentally achievable serum levels (100 nM-1 μM). To investigate the inhibitory effect of sunitinib in vivo, we established luciferase-labeled human RCC cells (ACHN(Luc) ). Sunitinib prevented the growth of ACHN(Luc) RCC cells in the bone metastatic mouse model. The number of osteoclasts in sunitinib-treated mice was significantly less than that in control mice. Serum and urine levels of NTx in patients with metastatic RCC declined significantly during the first 4 weeks of sunitinib treatment (p = 0.027). Sunitinib is a potent anticancer agent for RCC bone metastases, at least for papillary RCC.     

The role of radical nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The role of cytoreductive surgery in patients with metastatic renal cancer remains controversial. Recent data from our Southwest Oncology Group trial suggest that cytoreduction confers an approximately 50% increase in median survival for such patients when they are treated with interferon-alfa-2b immunotherapy. The timing of cytoreduction, and in which patients it may be most applicable, are discussed herein.     

Optimizing treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

With the advent of targeted antiangiogenic therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the prognosis for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease has significantly improved. Indeed, the results of several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), provide superior efficacy and tolerability compared with traditional cytokine-based treatments. However, TKI therapy is still associated with significant toxicities related to off-target inhibition that are detrimental to patient quality of life. The results of ongoing head-to-head trials will determine how these agents compare with each other in terms of efficacy, and whether TKIs that interact with fewer off-target kinases have improved tolerability profiles. Furthermore, examining how these agents could be integrated with surgery to provide a multimodal approach to the treatment of metastatic RCC could further improve the outlook for RCC patients.     

Temsirolimus in VEGF-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Background: Temsirolimus is an i.v. administered inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin with activity in the first-line setting in poor-prognosis patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The efficacy of this agent after failure of prior inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is unknown.Methods: A retrospective review of patients with metastatic RCC treated at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute and three regional cancer centers in Ontario, Canada, through the Torisel (temsirolimus) Compassionate Use Program was conducted. Demographic, toxicity and response data were collected.Results: A total of 87 patients with metastatic RCC were identified who had previously been treated with inhibitors of VEGF subsequently treated with temsirolimus. The majority of patients had either intermediate or poor-prognosis disease at baseline. Expected toxic effects including hyperglycemia and noninfectious pneumonitis were observed. The RECIST-defined objective response rate was 5% and the stable disease rate was 65%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval 2.8–4.8 months), and median overall survival was 11.2 months.Conclusions: In a cohort of pre-treated intermediate to poor-prognosis patients with metastatic RCC, weekly i.v. temsirolimus is associated with predictable, but manageable toxicity, and a TTP approaching 4 months.