Clostridium difficile infections in China

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection has become one of the major hospital-associated infections in Western countries in the last two decades. However, there is limited information on the status of C. difficile infection in Chinese healthcare settings. Given the large and increasing elderly population and the well-recognized problem of over-prescribing of broad spectrum antibiotics in China, it is critical to understand the epidemiology and potential risk factors that may contribute to C. difficile infection in China. A literature review of available published studies, including those in Chinese language-based journals, was conducted. A review of the currently available literature suggested the presence of C. difficile infections in China, but also suggested that these infections were not particularly endemic. This finding should lead to better designed and greatly expanded studies to provide a more reliable epidemiologically-based conclusion on the actual status of C. difficile infection in China, including the identification of any associated risk factors. Such information is ultimately valuable to develop appropriate strategies to prevent C. difficile infection and the vast negative impact of such infections in China and other developing countries.     

Extra-intestinal infections caused by Clostridium difficile

The objective of this paper was to investigate the incidence of extra-intestinal infections caused by Clostridium difficile. During a 10-year period, the microbiology laboratory of our institution isolated 2034 isolates of C. difficile . Of the 2034 isolates, 21 (1.08%) were obtained from extra-intestinal sources. This represents an incidence of extra-intestinal isolation of four cases per 100 000 admissions. We were able to review the records of 17 patients for our study. The isolates in 12 patients were obtained from structures or fluids anatomically close to the colon and included the following infections: peritonitis in five cases (three primary and two secondary), intra-abdominal abscesses in three patients and abdominal wound infections in four cases. The infections in the other five patients were not in the anatomic vicinity of the colon. They included one case with a brain abscess, two episodes of bacteremia and two cases of foot infections (one chronic osteomyelitis). In all but one case, C. difficile isolation was obtained as part of a polymicrobial flora. The isolates were frequently non-toxigenic and the extra-intestinal infections occurred without concomitant diarrhea or prior anti-microbial therapy. Out of the 17 patients, eight died and nine survived. Death could not be directly attributed to C. difficile in any of the cases. The isolation of C. difficile outside the intestinal tract is very uncommon. Its clinical significance should be interpreted with caution.     

Immunization strategies for Clostridium difficile infections

Clostridium difficile infection is a major cause of nosocomial disease in Western countries. The recent emergence of hypervirulent strains resistant to most antibiotics correlates with increasing disease incidence, severity and lethal outcomes. Current treatments rely on metronidazol and vancomycin, but the limited ability of these antibiotics to cure infection and prevent relapse highlights the need for new strategies. A better knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of the disease, the host immune response and identification of key virulence factors of Clostridium difficile now permits the development of new products specifically targeting the pathogen. Immune-based strategies relying on active vaccination or passive administration of antibody products are the focus of intense research and, today, the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies and of two vaccines are evaluated clinically. This review presents recent data, discusses the different strategies and highlights the challenges linked to the development of immunization strategies against this emerging threat.     

How to: Surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections

BackgroundThe increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) in healthcare settings in Europe since 2003 has affected both patients and healthcare systems. The implementation of effective CDI surveillance is key to enable monitoring of the occurrence and spread of C. difficile in healthcare and the timely detection of outbreaks.AimsThe aim of this review is to provide a summary of key components of effective CDI surveillance and to provide some practical recommendations. We also summarize the recent and current national CDI surveillance activities, to illustrate strengths and weaknesses of CDI surveillance in Europe.SourcesFor the definition of key components of CDI surveillance, we consulted the current European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) CDI-related guidance documents and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) protocol for CDI surveillance in acute care hospitals. To summarize the recent and current national CDI surveillance activities, we discussed international multicentre CDI surveillance studies performed in 2005–13. In 2017, we also performed a new survey of existing CDI surveillance systems in 33 European countries.ContentKey components for CDI surveillance are appropriate case definitions of CDI, standardized CDI diagnostics, agreement on CDI case origin definition, and the presentation of CDI rates with well-defined numerators and denominators. Incorporation of microbiological data is required to provide information on prevailing PCR ribotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility to first-line CDI treatment drugs. In 2017, 20 European countries had a national CDI surveillance system and 21 countries participated in ECDC-coordinated CDI surveillance. Since 2014, the number of centres with capacity for C. difficile typing has increased to 35 reference or central laboratories in 26 European countries.ImplicationsIncidence rates of CDI, obtained from a standardized CDI surveillance system, can be used as an important quality indicator of healthcare at hospital as well as country level.     

Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of Clostridium difficile correlated with previous antibiotic exposure

To analyze Clostridium difficile susceptibility results and genotypes in relation to antibiotic exposures that precipitated C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD), we examined 83 nosocomial C. difficile isolates recovered at a tertiary care center in Boston, Massachusetts. MICs were determined by E-test methodology using modified Brucella agar. Isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and restriction enzyme analysis. Antibiotic susceptibilities were: ciprofloxacin (0%), clindamycin (59%), trovafloxacin (63%), ceftriaxone (73%), piperacillin/tazobactam (100%), metronidazole (100%), and vancomycin (100%). The two most common strain groups, isolated from a total of 33 patients, were much more likely to be resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin, and trovafloxacin than other strain groups [79% (26 of 33) versus 2% (1 of 50), respectively]. Clindamycin exposure was strongly associated with CDAD caused by isolates that exhibited multiple resistance to clindamycin, erythromycin, and trovafloxacin (prevalence odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-16.8), whereas other antimicrobials did not yield significant associations. Resistance of specific C. difficile strains to clindamycin and other antimicrobial agents may contribute to their hospital dissemination and explain, in part, the propensity of clindamycin to trigger nosocomial outbreaks.     

Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic species consisting of bacilli with large, oval, subterminal spores, normally found in intestines. It uses two toxins, which produce cytopathic changes in the intestinal mucosae, causing diarrhea. Patients can present a spectrum of disease that varies from uncomplicated antibiotic-associated diarrhea to life threatening antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. C. difficile is the only species. There are no defined sterotypes. Toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains exist. The former produce varying amounts of toxin A (enterotoxin) and toxin B (Cytotoxin). Broad spectrum antiboiotic therapy eliminates much competing normal flora, permitting intestinal overgrowth of toxigenic C. difficile. There are no defined host defenses. Metronidazole and vancomycin should be used therapeutically, however, relapses can occur. Supportive therepy may be needed.     

Epidemiology, risk factors and prevention of Clostridium difficile nosocomial infections

Clostridium difficile is responsible for 10-25% of cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) and for virtually all cases of antibiotic-associated pseudo-membranous colitis (PMC). This anaerobic spore-forming bacterium has been identified as the leading cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea in adults. Pathogenesis relies on a disruption of the normal bacterial flora of the colon, a colonization by C. difficile and the release of toxins A and B that cause mucosal damage and inflammation. Incidence of C. difficile intestinal disorders usually varies from one to 40 per thousand patient admissions. Risk factors for C. difficile-associated diarrhea include antimicrobial therapy, older age (> 65 years), antineoplastic chemotherapy, and length of hospital stay. Nosocomial transmission of C. difficile via oro-fecal route occurs in 3-30% of total patient admissions but it remains asymptomatic in more than 66% of cases. Persistent environmental contamination and carrying of the organism on the hands of hospital staff are common. Measures that are effective in reducing cross-infection consist of an accurate and rapid diagnosis, an appropriate treatment, an implementation of enteric precautions for symptomatic patients, a reinforcement of hand-washing and a daily environmental disinfection. C. difficile is a common cause of infectious diarrhea and should be therefore systematically investigated in patients with nosocomial diarrhea.     

Increased age and proton pump inhibitors are associated with severe Clostridium difficile infections in children

BackgroundClostridium difficile infection (CDI) is increasing in children. We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics between CDI and colonization and to identify the risk factors for severe diseases of CDI in children.MethodWe retrospectively reviewed 124 children (1–18 years old) from 2011 to 2018. CDI was defined as diarrhea (≥3 loose stool in the past 24 h) with confirmed toxigenic strain. Colonization was defined as presence of C. difficile without clinical symptoms. Severe diseases included ileus, acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal bleeding or mortality. Patients younger than 1 year old and coinfections with other enteric pathogens were excluded.ResultsAmong 124 patients with C. difficile identified, 49 of them fulfilled CDI definition and 75 had C. difficile colonization. Children with CDI were more likely to present with watery (74% vs. 1%, p < 0.01) and mucoid stool (25% vs. 7%, p < 0.01) and occult blood in stool (67% vs. 33%, p < 0.01) than children with colonization. In CDI cases, elevated age-adjusted creatinine (18% vs. 0%, p = 0.03) and hyponatremia (134 mEq/L vs. 137 mEq/L, p = 0.04) were found. Also, they had more complicated diseases (27% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, age older than 4 years (adjusted odds ratio: 5.83; 95% confidence interval: 1.05–32.27) and proton pump inhibitor use (PPI) (adjusted odds ratio: 7.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.07–49.07) were the independent factors for severe diseases.ConclusionsWatery diarrhea, mucoid stool and occult blood in stool could differentiate CDI from colonization. Patients with increased age and previous PPI use were the independent risk factors for severe diseases in children.     

Severe Clostridium difficile infections in intensive care units: Diverse clinical presentations

BackgroundClostridium difficile infections (CDIs) cause significant mortality and morbidity. Critically ill patients are susceptible to CDIs and tend to have severe CDIs, and their clinical presentations are not merely diarrhea.Materials and methodsFrom September 2017 to March 2018, the adults with CDIs in the ICUs were included. Fecal specimens with positive results of glutamate dehydrogenase assay were cultured for C. difficile, and toxinotyping and ribotyping for available C. difficile isolates were done. The CDI cases were categorized into the diarrheal group and ileus group. Difficult-to-treat cases with the presentations of life-threatening complications (bowel perforation or bacteremia), toxic megacolon, and refractory diarrhea, were analyzed.ResultsTotally 23 cases, including 6 cases of ileus and 17 of diarrhea, were included. Overall, the incidence of CDI in the ICUs was 10.7 cases per 10,000 patient-days. The ileus group tended to have more severe presentation, shorter ICU stay, higher ICU mortality, and receive initial intravenous metronidazole therapy. Severe and fulminant CDIs accounted for 65.2% (15 cases). The ICU mortality rate was 39.1%, but only one death was directly related to CDI (4.3%). Of nine (39.1%) difficult-to-treat cases, there was only one isolate of RT611 with tcdC deletion and cdtA/cdtB from a case with toxic megacolon. No hypervirulent isolates of RT027 or 078 were detected.ConclusionSevere CDIs in the ICU were not rare. Clinicians should be aware of abdominal symptoms and signs other than diarrhea, such as ileus, to make timely diagnosis and management of CDI.     

Typing of Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile is primarily recognised as a nosocomially acquired pathogen manifesting in gastrointestinal disease subsequent to the patient receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. Infection can be sporadic, but outbreaks commonly occur within a ward or hospital as a result of cross-infection. Since the 1980s, the epidemiology of C. difficile disease has been studied by the application of many different typing or fingerprinting methods; these, and the lessons learned, are reviewed herein.     

Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections

Asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization is common in hospitalized patients. Existing C. difficile assay comparisons lack data on severity of diarrhea or patient outcomes, limiting the ability to interpret their results in regard to the diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). The objective of this study was to measure how including patient presentation with the C. difficile assay result impacted assay performance to diagnose CDI. Stool specimens from 150 patients that met inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Nine methods to detect C. difficile in stool were evaluated. All patients were interviewed prospectively to assess diarrhea severity. We then assessed how different reference standards, with and without the inclusion of patient presentation, impact the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the assays to diagnose CDI. There were minimal changes in sensitivity; however, specificity was significantly lower for the assays Tox A/B II, C. diff Chek-60, BD GeneOhm Cdiff, Xpert C. difficile, and Illumigene C. difficile and for toxigenic culture (P was <0.01 for all except Tox A/B II from fresh stool, for which the P value was 0.016) when the reference standard was recovery of toxigenic C. difficile from stool plus the presence of clinically significant diarrhea compared to when the reference standard was having at least four assays positive while ignoring diarrhea severity. There were 15 patients whose assay result was reported as negative but subsequently found to be positive by at least four assays in the comparison. None suffered from any CDI-related adverse events. In conclusion, clinical presentation is important when interpreting C. difficile diagnostic assays.