Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry

Both dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) using 153Gd and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) can be used for measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the total skeleton and its seven major regions. The short-term precision (coefficient of variation, CV) of DEXA for total-body BMD using the medium (20 minute) and fast (10 minute) speeds was 0.34 and 0.68% in 5 normal subjects; the corresponding CV in 5 osteoporotic females were 0.70 and 1.04%. The CV for BMD using DPA was 0.82% in 8 normal subjects and 0.70% in 12 osteoporotic patients. The CV for regional BMD using DPA was similar to fast-speed DEXA, without significant differences (p NS); precision with medium-speed DEXA was superior to DPA, and the differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.05) for head, spine, trunk, ribs, and pelvis. Total-body measurements using both DPA and DEXA were done on 99 subjects (84 females and 15 males). Significant correlations (r = 0.98; p less than 0.001) were found between DEXA and DPA measurements of both BMC and BMD. There were also significant correlations (r = 0.94-0.98; p less than 0.001) between DEXA and DPA measurements of anatomic regions (head, trunk, spine, pelvis, ribs, arms, and legs). DPA and DEXA results for BMD of total skeleton, ribs, pelvis, and legs were similar (p NS), and statistically significant differences were found in head, spine, and arm measurements (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.01, and p less than 0.05, respectively); regression equations allowed adjustment of DEXA values in patients already measured with the earlier DPA method.     

Periprosthetic bone remodelling around a prosthesis for distal femoral tumours. Measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

We used dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to evaluate the extent of periprosthetic bone remodelling around a prosthesis for distal femoral reconstruction, the Kotz modular femoral tibial replacement (KMFTR; Howmedica, Rutherford, New Jersey). A total of 23 patients was entered into the study which had four parts: 1) 17 patients were scanned three times on both the implant and contralateral legs to determine whether the precision of DEXA measurements was adequate to estimate bone loss surrounding the anchorage piece of the KMFTR; 2) in 23 patients the bone mineral density (BMD) in different regions of interest surrounding the diaphyseal anchorage was compared with that of the contralateral femur at the same location to test whether there was consistent evidence of loss of BMD adjacent to the prosthetic stem; 3) in 12 patients sequential studies were performed about one year apart to compare bone loss; and 4) bone loss was compared in ten patients with implants fixed by three screws and in 13 without screws. The mean coefficients of variation (SD/mean) for the 17 sets of repeated scans ranged from 2.9% to 7.8% at different regions of interest in the KMFTR leg and from 1.4% to 2.5% in the contralateral leg. BMD was decreased in the KMFTR leg relative to the contralateral limb and the percentage of BMD loss in general increased as the region of interest moved distally in the femur. Studies done after one year showed no consistent pattern of progressive bone loss between the two measurements. The ten patients with implants fixed by screws were found to have a mean loss of BMD of 42% in the most distal part of the femur, while the 13 without screw fixation had a mean loss of 11%. DEXA was shown to have adequate precision to evaluate loss of BMD around the KMFTR. This was evident relative to the contralateral leg in all patients and generally increased in the most distal part of the femur. In general, it stabilised between two measurements taken one year apart and was greater surrounding implants fixed by cross-locking screws.     

An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry

Dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) is a well-established procedure for measuring bone mineral density (BMD). Recently, dual-energy X-ray absorptiomery (DXA) has become available, which has the ability to measure BMD both regionally and in the total body (TB). We have evaluated the in vivo and in vitro precision of a DXA instrument and compared it with a DPA instrument with similar software characteristics.The short-term precision of BMD measurements using DXA was assessed in 65 postmenopausal women who had duplicate scans performed, with repositioning between scans. Precision was 0.9% in the lumbar spine and 1.4% in the femoral neck.The midterm precision of DXA was compared with DPA by scanning 10 volunteers a mean of four times over 24 weeks, on both instruments. The precision of the bone mineral content (BMC) and area measurements was significantly better (P<0.05) with DXA than with DPA. Long-term in vitro precision was assessed by scanning an aluminium spine phantom over 42 weeks, and a cadaveric sample over 52 weeks, on both instruments. Precision was similar using the aluminium phantom, but was significantly improved (P<0.001) when using DXA for scanning the cadaveric sample.Highly significant correlations (allP<0.001) of BMD, BMC and area measurements were observed when 70 volunteers were scanned on both instruments. However, there was a systematic difference in BMD values between the instruments. The precision of TB composition measurements assessed in 16 volunteers, over a 16-week period, were TB BMD 0.65%, TB lean tissue 1.47%, and TB fat tissue 2.73%. The correlation between weight measured by electronic scales and TB mass as measured by DXA, which was assessed in 70 volunteers, was excellent (r=0.99,p<0.001).We conclude that DXA offers improvements in measuring BMD over DPA in terms of faster scanning times and improved resolution, resulting in better precision, with the additional advantage of the ability to measure TB composition with high precision.     

Influence of patient's weight on dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density

Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic QDR 1000) and by¹⁵³Gd dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) (Novo Lab 22a) in 120 postmenopausal women. Though a high correlation existed between the two techniques, the ratio between DXA and DPA values was not constant. Using DXA we observed a higher dependence of BMD on weight than in the DPA measurements. To investigate the different behaviour of DXA and DPA machines with weight, we analysed the effects of increasing thickness of soft tissue equivalents on the BMD of the Hologic spine phantom and on the BMD equivalent of an aluminium standard tube. Increasing tissue-equivalent thickness caused the phantom BMD measured by DPA to decrease significantly but had not effect on the DXA measurements. The different behaviour of DPA and DXA equipment with regard to the phantoms could account for the differences observed in the relations between BMD and weight in the patients. Using multiple regression we studied the influence of weight and body mass index on the relation between BMD measured by the two techniques. The introduction of either of these variables into the regression resulted in an improvement of the prediction of the DXA values from the DPA values. However, the residual standard error of the estimate was still higher than the combined precision errors of the two methods, so that no simple relation allows a conversion of BMD_DPA into BMD_DXA. Our results confirm that BMD is positively correlated with weight in postmenopausal women; the influence of weight on BMD is blunted when the Novo Lab 22a DPA machine is used for measuring bone mineral.     

股骨近端骨密度的测量

双能X线骨密度仪检测骨密度是诊断骨质疏松症和疗效随访的金标准,特别是髋部骨密度的测量对于骨折的预测尤其测定部位本身骨折的预测作用较大.由于脊柱部位的骨密度测量值易受到脊柱退行性疾病的病理改变如退行性侧凸、骨赘增生、腰椎间盘突出等影响,测量的准确性下降.因而近年来欧美国家临床试验也好或者骨质疏松诊疗也好,大都以股骨近端的BMD测定为标准.本文就股骨近端解剖特点、骨密度测量的意义、方法以及测量的注意点作一个综述,以期帮助临床医生或技术员全面评估股骨近端骨密度测定的意义.     

A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip

Summary Dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) is currently the most widely used method for noninvasive bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the axial skeleton. Dual energy X-ray absorptimetry (DEXA) is a recently developed technique that uses an X-ray tube as a photon source; it has demonstrated several significant advantages over DPA in preliminary studies. We report here a quantitative comparison of the DEXA and DPA technologies using a Hologic DEXA (Hologic QDR model 1000, Waltham, MA) scanner and a Lunar DPA (Lunar Radiation DP3, gandolineum-153 source) scanner at both the proximal femur and lumbar spine sites using bone density measurements from a populationbased sample of older white men and women who had complete DEXA and DPA measurements of the hip (n=217) or the spine (n=176). To examine the relationship of BMD measured by the DPA scanner to BMD measured on the DEXA scanner, normal least squares linear regression was used to regress the DPA BMD on the DEXA BMD for each site. DEXA values were consistently lower than DPA values, with an average difference of 16%. The squared multiple correlation (R²) values were at or above 0.95 for almost all sites, with Ward's triangle having the lowest value (0.89). The slope for all sites was similar, ranging from 0.94 to 1.1. Research and clinical centers that wish to change to DEXA technology because of its shorter examination time and greater precision can therefore compare DEXA with DPA values using representative convesion factors.     

甘肃兰州地区491例双能X线骨密度测定分析

目的 了解兰州地区正常人群腰椎，髋部骨密度（BMD）的年龄变化规律，为当地骨质疏松诊断提供科学依据。方法 2000年9月－2002年7月，采用法国DMS公司生产的Challenger双能量X线骨密度仪（DEXA）测量年龄在20－89岁之间的491例正常人L2－L4椎体前后位和左髋部BMD，获得的数据录入SPSS软件数据库，并进行有关统计分析。结果 男女两性BMD在30岁左右达到峰值，约在40岁左右开始减低，其中女性在50岁后下降速度加快，但男性腰椎BMD随年龄的增高下降并不明显。结论 BMD达峰值后随年龄增加而减低，但在男性腰椎这一趋势并不明显。     

In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers

Summary Six Hologic QDR-1000 DEXA bone densitometers at different centers across the USA were compared to determine the intermachine variability. Nine scans in succession were acquired on each machine using a single anthropomorphic lumbar spine phantom (manufactured by Hologic). Values for BMC, area, and BMD were recorded for each measurement. Means, standard deviations (SD), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each machine. All the CVs (BMC, area, BMD) were less than 1% (range 0.3%–0.6%). The CV of the means at the six sites were 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.5% for BMC, area, and BMD, respectively. Although several significant differences for BMC, area, and BMD were noted by ANOVA between machines at different sites, the difference between the highest and lowest means of the individual machines was only 1.1%, 1.31%, and 1.07% for BMC, area, and BMD. The small variations between the DEXA systems are encouraging for researchers involved in multicenter trials in which data are pooled.     

Measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry around an uncemented knee prosthesis

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry allows the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) around an uncemented hip prosthesis, but has not so far been widely used to measure BMD around a knee prosthesis. We studied 16 patients undergoing total knee replacement using a Miller-Galante uncemented prosthesis for either osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis of the knee. The precision of the measurement was improved by using a leg brace. The pattern of bone loss differed in the lateral projection by region (P = .001). There was significant loss of bone from the distal femur but not from the patella or proximal tibia over the 6-month period after insertion of a knee prosthesis.     

Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis and for monitoring patients. Errors in demographic information, improper patient positioning, incorrect scan analysis, and mistakes in interpretation can all lead to a wrong clinical decision or action. This paper reviews the fundamentals of positioning, scan analysis, and interpretation for central DXA and highlights some of the common pitfalls that may lead to erroneous results.     

Vertebral bone mineral density measured laterally by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

The bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar vertebrae in the anteroposterior (AP) view may be overestimated in osteoarthritis or with aortic calcification, which are common in elderly. Furthermore, the risk of spinal crush fracture should be more closely related inversely to the BMD of the vertebral body than to that of the posterior arch. Therefore, we measured BMD of lumbar vertebrae in lateral (LAT) view (L2–L3), using a standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DEXA), thus eliminating most of the posterior spinal elements. The precision of BMD LAT measurement was determined both in vitro and in healthy volunteers. Then, we compared the capability of BMD LAT and BMD AP scans for monitoring bone loss related to age and for discriminating the BMD of postmenopausal women with nontraumatic vertebral fractures from that of young subjects. In vitro, when a spine phantom was placed in lateral position in the middle of 26 cm of water in order to simulate both soft-tissue thickness and X-ray source remoteness, the coefficient of variation (CV) of six repeated determinations of BMD was 1.0%. In vivo, the CV of paired BMD LAT measurements obtained in 20 healthy volunteers after repositioning was 2.8%. The age-related difference between a peak bone mass group estimated in a group of 27 healthy women aged 20 to 35 years and a group of 50 women aged 60 to 75 years, in whom neither vertebral fracture nor osteoporosis risk factors could be detected, were 21.7% and 37.6% in AP and LAT view, respectively. An arbitrary BMD fracture threshold was defined in AP and LAT views as the 90th percentile of the BMD value of a group of 22 osteoporotic women with vertebral fractures. The distribution of BMD AP and LAT above and below this threshold in 169 consecutively screened women without vertebral fracture was then analysed. In both AP and LAT views, 39.1% and 31.3% had BMD values above and below this threshold, respectively. Of the remaining, 16.0% had a BMD below this threshold only in AP and 13.6% only in LAT view. Thus, if BMD LAT was a better reflection of vertebral body bone mass than BMD AP, and thereby a better predictor of the resistance to crush fracture, our results would suggest that only the use of the standard AP view could under- or overestimate spinal fracture risk in about 30% of women screened for osteoporosis. In conclusion, our results indicate that BMD measurement in lateral view is feasible with a standard DEXA instrument. This mode of scanning, besides overcoming artefacts due to osteoarthritis of the posterior arch and aortic calcifications, appears to provide a greater sensitivity for assessing bone mass loss of the vertebral body than the standard anteroposterior scan.     

Effect of ethanol on bone mineral density of rats evaluated by dual-photon X-ray absorptiometry

Abuse of alcohol may derange bone metabolism and cause osteoporosis. Due to confounding factors associated with alcohol abuse, e.g., dietary deficiencies and liver damage, a study using an animal model is preferable to examine whether alcohol itself actually reduces bone density. We evaluated the effect of alcohol intake on bone in rats by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Six-week-old male (n = 16) and female (n = 16) Wister rats were divided into two groups. Sixteen alcohol-exposed rats (8 male and 8 female) were fed Lieber's liquid diet and 16 control rats (8 male and 8 female) were fed a control liquid diet. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of the right femur were measured before and after experimental feeding under anesthesia. The BMD of lumbar spine (L2–L4) of sacrificed rats was measured. For male rats, BMD and BMC decreased significantly in the alcohol group (P = 0.0132 and 0.0133, respectively) but did not decrease in control group. For female rats, BMD and BMC decreased significantly in the alcohol group (P = 0.0012 and <0.0001, respectively) but did not decrease in the control group. For male rats, the mean ratio of BMD after experimental feeding divided by BMD before experimental feeding was significantly lower in the alcohol group than in the control group (P = 0.0031). For female rats, the mean ratio of BMD after experimental feeding divided by BMD before experimental feeding was also lower in the alcohol group than in the control group (P = 0.0002). For male rats, the mean BMD of L2–L4 after experimental feeding was significantly lower in the alcohol group than in the control group (P = 0.0210). For female rats, the mean BMD of L2–L4 after experimental feeding was also significantly lower in the alcohol group than in the control group (P = 0.0006). These results indicate that alcohol intake decreased the BMD of rats in both spongy and cortical bone, and that the reduction of BMD was greater in female rats than in male rats. Received: March 16, 2000 / Accepted: May 11, 2000     

Comparison of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the measurement of thoracic vertebral bone mineral density: Compressive force versus bone mineral

³¹P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS) measurements were made on human T2 and T3 vertebral bodies. The bone mineral content (BMC) of isolated vertebral bodies minus the posterior elements and disks was measured using (1) NMRS on a 3.5 T, 85 mm bore GE Medical Systems NT-150 superconducting spectrometer, (2) a Lunar Corporation DPX-L dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner in an anterior-posterior (AP) orientation, (3) a Norland Corporation XR26 DXA scanner, also in an AP direction, and (4) a Norland Corporation model 2600 dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) densitometer in both the AP and superior-inferior (SI) directions. Vertebral body volumes were measured using a water displacement technique to determine volume bone mineral densities (VBMD). They were then compressed to failure using an electrohydraulic testing device, followed by ashing in a muffle furnace at 700 °C for 18 h. Correlations of BMC between NMRS and DPA, DXA and ashing were excellent (0.96r0.99); in a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, means were not statistically different at ap level of 0.757. The correlations of VBMD between NMRS and the other methods were not as good (0.83r0.95); in a one-way ANOVA test, means were not statistically different at ap level of 0.089. BMC was a better predictor of ultimate compressive failure than VBMD for all six methods. For NMRS, the regression coefficient for BMC wasr ²=0.806, compared withr ²=0.505 for VBMD. NMRS may prove an alternative to present methods of determing bone mineral.     

The determination of bone fracture properties by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and single-photon absorptiometry: A comparative study

Summary Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) were used to quantitate the structural strength and local material properties of healing tibial osteotomies in 32 dogs. Dogs were divided into four equal groups, euthanatized at either 2, 4, 8, or 12 weeks, and imaged with DEXA and SPA. Invasive techniques were used to determine (1) the torsional properties of the bone, (2) the local stiffness properties and calcium content within the bone, and (3) new bone formation and porosity by histology. There were no differences between SPA and DEXA in their associations with the torsional properties of bone. SPA and DEXA had strong correlations with the ultimate torque (R²=0.76, 0.51) and the torsional stiffness (R²=0.68, 0.53) of bone. SPA and DEXA of periosteal callus, endosteal callus, and cortical bone had similar associations with indentation stiffness, calcium content, new bone formation, and porosity. SPA of gap tissue had significantly stronger associations with these four parameters than DEXA (P<0.05). Correlation coefficients (R²) with these local material properties ranged as high as 0.82 for SPA with new bone formation in the gap tissue and 0.73 for DEXA with indentation stiffness of periosteal callus.     

Ultrasound velocity and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal and pagetic bone

Bone affected by Paget's disease is known to be dense but more prone to fractures. It is proposed that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) assess different aspects of the skeletal status. In this study, we used Paget's disease of the tibia as a model to explore this. Ten patients with Paget's disease affecting a single tibia were investigated with the normal side acting as the control within each individual. Tibial speed of sound (SOS) was measured at the midpoint of the affected and control tibiae using a Soundscan 2000 (Myriad Ultrasound System, Rehovot, Israel) device. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the tibia was measured at a level corresponding to the site of the tibial ultrasound using a QDR-2000+ (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA). The mean bone area and estimated volume in the pagetic tibia was greater than that in the normal tibia (bone area: 25.10 +/- 8.00 vs. 20.23 +/- 5.43 cm(2), p = 0.017; estimated bone volume: 68.79 +/- 41.99 vs. 43.62 +/- 22.56 cm(3), p = 0.02), reflecting the bone expansion characteristic of Paget's disease. The bone mineral content (BMC) was more markedly increased in the pagetic tibia (27.38 +/- 12.98 vs. 14.39 +/- 6.14 g, p = 0.003) and, consequently, areal bone mineral density (BMD) was also markedly increased in the pagetic bone (1.09 +/- 0.38 vs. 0.77 +/- 0.44 g/cm(2), p = 0.018). There was no significant difference in the estimated volumetric BMD between the pagetic and the normal tibia (0.48 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.51 g/cm(3), p = 0.96). In contrast, the mean tibial SOS in the leg affected by Paget's disease was significantly lower than in the unaffected leg (3228 +/- 234 vs. 3840 +/- 164 m/sec, p < 0.001). When expressed as a z score using the normal limb as reference, areal BMD was 0.72 SD higher in the affected limb, whereas tibial SOS was 3.72 SD lower. We conclude that tibial SOS detects important changes in bone quality in Paget's disease of bone, which are unrelated to calcium content.     

Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine was used to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of both femora in 760 female volunteers. Each volunteer completed a questionnaire and exclusion criteria were applied such that only 480 of these were considered normal subjects. The remaining 280 women failed to comply with the criteria and were considered abnormal; their BMD results were analysed separately. Two abnormal subgroups, one with previous long bone fractures and one with radiologically diagnosed osteopenia, were studied. BMD values for femoral neck, Ward's triangle and trochanter were compared between the two femora in all the above groups. No dominance relationship was found when comparing left to right femur, averaged over any population studied, but large differences were found between the femora in individual volunteers. There was a high correlation between BMD in opposing femora of 0.91, 0.91 and 0.84 for the femoral neck, Ward's triangle and trochanter respectively. However, in normal subjects the percentage variation in these regions ranged up to 34%, 64% and 80% respectively at the different femoral sites. In addition, the normal population was divided into two subgroups, one in which the density difference between the femora was large, and the other in which the difference was statistically insignificant. The analytical and anatomical variations between these two groups were investigated. Only part of the difference appeared to be due to analytical problems and it seems that there is a genuine difference in femoral density. Poor correlation for femoral neck percentage density difference was found with average BMD, age, height and weight in the normal population. This study concludes that a measurement of BMD in one femur can not reliably predict the BMD in the contralateral femur. It is therefore recommended that routine density measurements should include scanning of both femora.     

Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Summary Long-term precision of two Hologic DXA scanners was derived from repeated clinical measurements. With typical subjects, the long-term coefficients of variation were about twice the short-term. The accuracy of the measurement of changes was compromised by anomalies, but this did not seriously affect clinical conclusions. Introduction Long-term precision and accuracy of BMD measurements need review. Methods Long-term precision was examined by selecting, from Hologic databases, subjects who had had four scans over a period of 2 to 5 years and was calculated from the SEE of a regression of BMD against time. Accuracy was assessed from relationships between changes (Δ) in BA, BMD and BMC. Results For one group of subjects, the long-term precision was 2.4% for lumbar spine, 2.3% for total hip and 2.7% for femoral neck when expressed as CVs. These values were nearly twice the short-term CVs of 1.3% for spine, 1.2% for total hip and 1.4% for femoral neck. For another group, a negative exponential regression gave a better fit, leading to CVs of 1.3% for the spine, 1.4% for total hip and 2.1% for femoral neck. Significant correlations between ΔBA and ΔBMC were found. These led to an underestimate of ΔBMD in spine and hip by 25%. Conclusions The poorer long-term precision for typical patients should be borne in mind in monitoring progress. The underestimate of changes could account for only a part of the underestimation by BMD measurements of the anti-fracture effects of anti-resorptive drugs.     

Vertebral fracture assessment by new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technologies in the detection of vertebral fractures (VFs). Sixty-eight patients were submitted to DXA and conventional radiography (XR) on the same day. Lateral images of the spine were independently evaluated by three radiologists with different experience in skeletal imaging, in two sessions with 7 days between evaluations of the same anonymous images. The most expert physician repeated the analysis in a subsequent reading session after further 7 days. Results from expert XR evaluation were considered as gold standard. A semiquantitative approach was used to interpret images and morphometric analysis was performed when a VF was suspected. Seventy vertebrae (70/884, 7.9%) were excluded from the lesion-based analysis, as not evaluable: 11/70 (15.7%) missed by XR only, 56/70 (80.0%) missed by DXA only, 3/70 (4.3%) missed by both techniques (upper thoracic spine). Forty "true" fractures were detected (4.9% out of 814 vertebrae) in 26 patients (38.2% of the 68 studied patients). Twenty-five (62.5%) were mild fractures. DXA sensitivity and specificity were 70.0% and 98.3% on a lesion-based analysis, 73.1% and 90.5% on a patient-based analysis. Intra-observer agreement was excellent with no significant difference between the two techniques. Inter-observer agreement among the 3 observers was higher for XR (k=0.824 versus 0.720 in the detection of VFs, p=0.011). DXA accuracy was not influenced by radiologist experience; T4-L4 assessability as well as reproducibility and repeatability of the two techniques and accuracy of DXA were independent from sex, age, body mass index, grade of arthrosis. However DXA sensitivity was affected by mild VFs. Vertebral level did not affect the diagnostic performance with exception of vertebral body assessability. Latest improvements make VFs assessment by DXA competitive with traditional radiographic gold standard, providing consistent advantages and attractions. Few limitations still affect DXA performance and need to be overcome.     

Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry

Summary A method was developed for measuring total body bone mineral (TBBM) and lean body mass in vivo using dual-photon absorptiometry. The entire body was scanned in a rectilinear raster (transverse speed of 1 cm/s and longitudinal steps of 2.5 cm) with a modified nuclear medicine scanner and conventional nuclear counting electronics. The source was¹⁵³Gd (1 Ci) with principal photopeaks at 44 and 100 keV. The scan time was about 70 min with an absorbed dose of under 1 mrem. The low dose allows measurements to be repeated at frequent intervals or used on children. Short-term (months) precision of TBBM was about 1.5% for isolated skeletons and about 2% on normal human subjects. Long-term (years) precision on skeletons was under 3%. The precision of percent fat was 0.9%, which would lead to an error of less than 1% in the TBBM. Geometry of measurements also had minimal (and correctable) influence on the accuracy of results. The accuracy (1 standard error of estimate) of TBBM on isolated skeletons (N=5) was 36 g (equivalent to about 13 g of Ca) with a correlation coefficient of 0.99; this error amounts to about 1–1.5% in normal adults, 2% in older women, and 2.5% in osteoporotic females. The dual-photon absorptiometry method could be implemented in many nuclear medicine departments to follow skeletal changes during growth and aging or to follow the course of a disease or treatment.     

Total body and regional bone mineral by dual-photon absorptiometry in metabolic bone disease

Summary Dual-photon absorptiometry (¹⁵³Gd) was used to measure bone mineral of the total body and major anatomical areas. Patients with osteoporosis (♂=11, ♀=18) and with renal osteodystrophy (n=17) were significantly below (20%) normal females (n=72) and males (n=13) at most sites. In the osteoporotic patients, but not the renal patients, there was preferential osteopenia of the spine. Bone loss in all anatomical areas became evident after the menopause with an annual loss rate of about 0.7%.