Dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are established as effective drugs for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) throughout its course. As monotherapy, they produce effective control of motor symptoms and combine this with a low risk for motor complications. As an adjunct to levodopa, they improve motor control and limit the need for levodopa in those patients in whom this may be considered relevant. The non-ergot dopamine agonists in particular have a good safety profile, although as with other agonists, sedation, and cognitive and behavioral problems may be limiting in some patients. Pramipexole has shown benefit in improving depressive symptoms in PD. Ropinirole and pramipexole have both demonstrated a reduction in the rate of loss of nigrostriatal innervation as determined by imaging in PD patients, when compared with levodopa. Thus, dopamine agonists contribute to several dimensions of the management of PD and have become an integral part of the disease treatment algorithm.     

Initial treatment of early Parkinson’s disease: A review of recent, randomized controlled trials

Many studies have shown dopamine agonists to significantly improve parkinsonian symptoms compared with placebo in early Parkinson’s disease (PD), but how do agonists compare with the standard treatment of levodopa? Recently, three large, multicenter, randomized controlled studies directly comparing a dopamine agonist with levodopa as initial therapy in early PD have been published. These studies suggest that although both agents effectively ameliorate parkinsonian symptoms, levodopa was superior to dopamine agonists as measured by improvement in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. However, levodopa was more frequently associated with dopaminergic motor complications, and the dopamine agonists were more commonly associated with adverse events. Until further studies clearly demonstrate the beneficial effects of one therapeutic strategy over another, the decision to initiate treatment in early PD with either an agonist or levodopa will be based on the favorable motor complication profile of agonists versus the more potent antiparkinsonian effects and the favorable side-effect profile of levodopa.     

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.     

Optimizing long-term therapy for Parkinson disease: levodopa, dopamine agonists, and treatment-associated dyskinesia

The treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) involves pharmacological treatment, often with levodopa or dopamine agonists, to restore the dopaminergic deficit associated with parkinsonian symptoms. Either agent provides symptom relief that becomes less effective in the course of PD, and switching or combining these agents or adding other therapies becomes necessary for symptom control. In an effort to delay the development of motor complications, dopamine agonists are often used in the initial treatment of PD. However, control of PD symptoms is superior with levodopa. Moreover, dopamine agonists are less well tolerated overall and are associated with a number of rare but serious adverse effects. In the long-term management of PD, treatment-associated dyskinesia often becomes sufficiently troublesome as to compromise the effective dosing of antiparkinsonian medication. More effective strategies for managing dyskinesia are needed.     

Dopamine agonists and neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are effective in reversing the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). They have also shown that they can delay or prevent the onset of motor complications associated with levodopa use. Recent attention has focused on the possible role for dopamine agonists in neuroprotection. Numerous studies have demonstrated that a variety of dopamine agonists can protect dopaminergic neuronal function in several toxin model systems. Pramipexole in particular has shown efficacy in reducing toxicity to MPTP, MPP, rotenone and 6-hydroxydopamine. Recent studies in early PD using imaging parameters as a surrogate marker of dopaminergic neuronal integrity have shown that pramipexole and ropinirole can apparently retard the rate of cell loss. These observations are of considerable interest, but additional studies are required to confirm a neuroprotective function for these dopamine agonists.     

Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are highly effective as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease and have rapidly gained popularity as a monotherapy in the early stages of Parkinson's disease for patients less than 65-70 years old. In the latter case, dopamine agonists are about as effective as levodopa but patients demonstrate a lower tendency to develop motor complications. However, dopamine agonists lose efficacy over time and the number of patients remaining on agonist monotherapy decreases to less than 50% after 3 years of treatment. Thus, after a few years of treatment the majority of patients who started on dopamine agonists will be administered levodopa, in a combined dopaminergic therapy, in order to achieve a better control of motor symptoms.     

Drug treatment of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease. While its cause remains elusive, much progress has been made regarding its treatment. Available drugs have a good symptomatic effect, but none has yet been shown to slow the progression of the disease in humans. The most efficacious drug is levodopa, but it remains unclear whether the symptomatic benefit is associated with neurotoxic effects and long-term deterioration. The long-term problem associated with levodopa is the appearance of dyskinesias, which is significantly delayed among patients treated with dopamine agonists as initial therapy. Less clear is the role of other drugs in PD, such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), including selegiline and rasagiline, the putative N-meihyl-o-aspartaie (NMDA) receptor antagonists amantadine and memantine, and the muscarinic receptor blockers. All these may be used as initial therapy and delay the use of dopaminergic drugs, or can be added later to reduce specific symptoms (tremor or dyskinesias). Advanced PD is frequently associated with cognitive decline. To some extent, this can be helped by treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine. Similarly, hallucinations and delusions affect PD patients in the advanced stages of their disease. The use of classical neuroleptic drugs in these patients is contraindicated because of their extrapyramidal effects, but atypical drugs, and particularly clozapine, are very helpful. The big void in the therapy of PD lies in the more advanced stages. Several motor symptoms, like postural instability, dysphagia, and dysphonia, as well as dyskinesias, are poorly controlled by existing drugs. New therapies should also be developed against autonomic symptoms, particularly constipation.     

Treatment of motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease: a practical approach

Patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) are known to develop motor complications after a few years of levodopa (l-dopa) therapy. Motor fluctuations develop with increasing severity of the disease, owing to loss of dopaminergic neurons and loss of the buffering capacity of the neurons to fluctuating dopamine levels. Dyskinesias develop as a result of pulsatile stimulation of the receptors and alterations in neuronal firing patterns. l-dopa remains the gold standard medication for the treatment of patients with advanced PD. However, once motor complications on l-dopa therapy emerge, clinicians may add on other classes of antiparkinsonian drugs such as dopamine agonists, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors (COMTIs) or monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (MAOBIs). The individualisation of the treatment seems to be the key for the best approach of advanced PD patients. The present review provides the most important current clinical data in the pharmacological treatment of motor symptoms in advanced PD and provides the clinician a simple algorithm in order to determine the best suitable treatment to advanced parkinsonian patients.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in management of motor response fluctuations in Parkinson's disease

Recent advances in the understanding of the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and other anti-Parkinson agents have brought about the development of rational approaches to the management of levodopa-related fluctuations in motor performance that plague the majority of patients with advanced PD. The rapid systemic clearance of levodopa underlies the "short duration" response to the drug, which is progressively unmasked as PD progresses and central dopamine synthetic and storage capacity can no longer buffer fluctuations in plasma levodopa levels. Dyskinesias may be considered a secondary pharmacodynamic consequence of such pharmacokinetically induced oscillations in brain dopamine levels. Therapeutic approaches aimed at stabilizing brain dopaminergic activity include the use of slowly releasing galenic formulations of levodopa, synthetic dopamine agonists of long-lasting biologic activity, and drugs such as deprenyl that act as "dopamine extenders." It remains to be seen whether early use of such treatment approaches will reduce the prevalence of motor response fluctuations, which are one of the most disabling complications of long-term treatment of PD.     

The rationale for continuous dopaminergic stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease

Control of movement depends on the continuous release of dopamine by neurons in the basal ganglia of the brain. The degeneration of these neurons in Parkinson's disease (PD) interferes with the flow of dopamine, leading to classic motor symptoms. In early PD, enough dopaminergic neurons remain to store dopamine provided by periodic dosing with oral levodopa and relatively normal, tonic levels of dopamine release are maintained. PD progression leads to degeneration of remaining dopaminergic terminals and loss of buffering capacity for exogenous levodopa. As a result, there are supraphysiological levels of dopamine after dosing and troughs when the available dopamine has been depleted. These divergent levels are associated with dyskinesia and ‘off’ states, respectively. Treatment strategies that provide a continuous flow of dopamine and can thus mimic normal physiological dopamine stimulation have potential to improve motor control for patients with advanced PD.     

Continuous dopaminergic delivery in Parkinson’s disease

Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias occur in the majority of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and are likely to result from changes in dopamine production, storage and release, occurring as consequences of the nigrostriatal degenerative process. All studies comparing levodopa versus dopamine agonist early therapy indicate that initiation with agonists is associated with a reduced risk of motor complications —in particular, dyskinesias— possibly because agonists’ longer half-lives provide continuous dopaminergic delivery. In advanced PD patients, switching from a pulsatile to continuous dopaminergic delivery may widen patients’ therapeutic window. Currently, this can be accomplished only with subcutaneous apomorphine or duodenal levodopa infusions. Apomorphine is a highly soluble agonist whose effect is similar to dopamine. Conversely, replacing whole oral therapy with levodopa infusion bypasses gastric emptying and avoids peaks and troughs in plasma by releasing levodopa in the duodenum/jejunum.

     

Deep brain stimulation and continuous dopaminergic stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease

Patients receiving oral levodopa, the standard treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), eventually develop motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Treatment options for patients with these symptoms include high-frequency deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) or continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS). STN-DBS is the prevalent surgical therapy for PD and has shown efficacy, but behavioural disorders, including cognitive problems, depression and suicidality have been reported. CDS can be achieved with oral dopamine agonists with a long half-life, transdermal or subcutaneous delivery of dopamine agonists, or intestinal levodopa infusion. Of these, duodenal levodopa infusion appears to be the most promising option in terms of both efficacy and safety.     

Dopamine agonists: the treatment for Parkinson's disease in the XXI century?

Levodopa combined with a peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DCI) has been considered the therapy of choice for Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa is nearly always effective, but has a high incidence of adverse effects with long term use, including response fluctuations (on/off phenomena) and dyskinesias. Dopaminergic agonists, acting directly at the receptor level, would be able to decrease the incidence of these motor complications.In progressive neurodegenerative diseases, such as PD, modification of the rate of disease progression (often referred to as neuroprotection) is currently a highly debated topic. Increased oxidative stress is thought to be involved in nigral cell death, that is characteristic of PD. This oxidative stress may be further exacerbated by levodopa therapy. These mechanisms have been proven in vitro and animal models, but it's relevance in humans remains speculative.Based on the considerations above, the emerging therapeutic strategies for PD advocate early use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of PD. A number of recent well-controlled studies have proven the efficacy of dopamine agonists used as monotherapy. Moreover, as predicted by animal studies, on the long term, dopaminergic agonists induce significantly less motor complications than levodopa.In the last 2years, three new dopamine agonists have been launched, including ropinirole, pramipexole and cabergoline. These new agonists have been added, as therapeutical options to well-established drugs, like pergolide, bromocriptine or talipexole. The recently launched compounds have proven efficacy in monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Unfortunately, only a very limited amount of comparative data among the different agonists is available. Pergolide has proven to be a superior drug to bromocriptine as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in a significant number of studies and is considered the gold standard dopamine agonist. Nevertheless, none of the recently launched compounds has compared itself against pergolide.A comparison of monotherapy trials is difficult, because of differences in design and populations. In a recently completed trial pergolide was statistically significantly better than placebo in all the efficacy parameters tested, with 57% of pergolide treated patients improving over 30% in the motor section of the UPDRS, as compared to 17% in the placebo arm. Interestingly, these results were obtained in the absence of any other antiparkinsonian drug during the trial. Recent monotherapy trials done with ropinirole and pramipexole achieved also significant improvements as monotherapy, but in these cases selegeline, a drug that causes a symptomatic improvement in PD, was allowed as co-medications during the trial. Not all trials used the same efficacy measures, i.e. monotherapy trials with pergolide and ropinirole used a "responder" based analysis (responder were all patients that improved 30% or more on the motor section of UPDRS), as well as a baseline to endpoint improvement in motor scores. Pramipexole monotherapy trials used only the latter approach, which is clinically less powerful than a responder analysis.Even with the difficulties mentioned above, all the recent trials with dopamine agonists have proven that these drugs are a useful symptomatic long term treatment for PD with or without levodopa and that the early use of dopamine agonists reduces the incidence of motor complications as compared to levodopa.     

International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence‐based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

Objective: The objective of this review was to update evidence‐based medicine recommendations for treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Background: The Movement Disorder Society Evidence‐Based Medicine Committee recommendations for treatments of PD were first published in 2002 and updated in 2011, and we continued the review to December 31, 2016. Methods: Level I studies of interventions for motor symptoms were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and quality scoring were as previously reported. Five clinical indications were considered, and conclusions regarding the implications for clinical practice are reported. Results: A total of 143 new studies qualified. There are no clinically useful interventions to prevent/delay disease progression. For monotherapy of early PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, oral levodopa preparations, selegiline, and rasagiline are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in early/stable PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, rasagiline, and zonisamide are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in optimized PD for general or specific motor symptoms including gait, rivastigmine is possibly useful and physiotherapy is clinically useful; exercise‐based movement strategy training and formalized patterned exercises are possibly useful. There are no new studies and no changes in the conclusions for the prevention/delay of motor complications. For treating motor fluctuations, most nonergot dopamine agonists, pergolide, levodopa ER, levodopa intestinal infusion, entacapone, opicapone, rasagiline, zonisamide, safinamide, and bilateral STN and GPi DBS are clinically useful. For dyskinesia, amantadine, clozapine, and bilateral STN DBS and GPi DBS are clinically useful. Conclusions: The options for treating PD symptoms continues to expand. These recommendations allow the treating physician to determine which intervention to recommend to an individual patient. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

D1 and functionally selective dopamine agonists as neuroprotective agents in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that results in major motor disturbances due primarily to loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. The mainstream treatment has been dopaminergic replacement therapy aimed at symptomatic relief, with the gold standard drug being the dopamine precursor levodopa. The general dogma has been that levodopa works primarily by indirectly activating the D(2) family of dopamine receptors. Recently, a number of direct dopamine agonists that target the D(2) and D(3) dopamine receptors have been used as dopaminergic replacement strategies. Although these direct D(2) and D(3) drugs cause only modest improvement in motor function compared to levodopa, they can delay the initiation of levodopa and can act synergistically with levodopa. In addition, they can delay the onset of levodopa-related motor complications. Recent imaging data also suggest that they may have neuroprotective effects. Whereas D(2)/D(3) agonists have received much attention as several drugs are available for clinical trials and usage, there has been a large body of data showing that the D(1) receptor actually may play a larger role in restoration of normal motor function. This review examines the current use of dopamine D(2)/D(3) agonists in treatment of PD and their potential for providing neuroprotection. Furthermore, we also examine the potential that D(1) agonists might have in neuroprotective actions in the disease progression.     

Current preclinical findings on substances against Parkinson's disease

Striatal dopamine loss provides the premise for dopamine substitution in palliative therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). This includes firstly L-dopa (L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, levodopa) and dopamine receptor agonists. Although this therapy has been demonstrated to induce marked clinical improvement in the early stages of PD, its use is limited in the long term by a loss of efficacy. In addition, most patients develop the "long-term L-dopa syndrome," which is characterized by a decrease in the control of Parkinsonian symptoms (decrease in the drug's effect) and the appearance of certain motor disturbances including episodes of akinetic freezing, debilitating dyskinesias, and on-off periods. The aim in developing new drugs is to achieve better therapeutic approaches. In the case of PD, the main strategies are to develop (1) alternatives to L-dopa therapy for alleviating the striatal dopamine deficit while avoiding or retarding the long-term L-dopa syndrome, (2) antidyskinetic approaches, and (3) neuroprotective drugs aimed at causal treatment of PD which is able to preserve the remaining dopaminergic neurones and to halt or at least retard the disease process. This article reviews new approaches for the treatment of PD and presents findings from our studies using a new experimental in vivo model of PD.     

Comparison of the clinical pharmacology of (-)NPA and levodopa in Parkinson''s disease.

Direct acting dopamine agonists are generally less effective than levodopa in relieving symptoms of Parkinson's disease. In an attempt to quantitate and explain this situation, the acute motor responses to intravenous injections of the dopamine agonist, (-)-N-n-propyl-norapomorphine hydrochloride (NPA), were compared with those of the dopamine precursor, levodopa. At optimum dose levels, the acute anti-Parkinsonian efficacy of NPA averaged only about 50% of maximum, while essentially total symptom suppression was obtained with levodopa in patients previously treated with the amine precursor. Dyskinesia severity, however, was similar with the two drugs. These differences in anti-Parkinsonian efficacy may reflect the fact that while NPA acts mainly on D-2 dopamine receptors, levodopa results in stimulation of both the D-1 and D-2 subsets of receptors at a more physiological ratio. Future efforts to develop dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinsonian symptoms may thus have to consider focusing on drugs having pharmacological profile more similar to that of dopamine.     

Treatment of Parkinson''s disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.     

Treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with a dopamine agonist.

The occurrence of side effects with long-term levodopa therapy, such as fluctuations in motor performance or abnormal movements, led to a search for new antiparkinsonian drugs. Dopamine agonists include ergot derivatives such as bromocriptine, lisuride, pergolide, and cabergoline and other agents which do not possess the ergot structure such as pramipexole and ropinirole. They all are powerful stimulators of the D2 dopamine receptor which probably underlies their therapeutic effects. The clinical consequences of their binding to other dopamine receptor subtypes (D1 or D3) remains unknown. They are usually prescribed in combination with levodopa when late side effects begin to occur. This review summarizes the available pharmacologic and clinical data to support the early use of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. Several strategies can be used, such as monotherapy or "early" or "late" combination with levodopa. Results of recent well-performed, modern clinical trials show that early use of the new dopamine agonists is able to effectively control the clinical symptoms for more than 3 years thereby offering the possibility of delaying the occurrence of levodopa-induced late motor side effects.     

Diagnosis and initiation of treatment in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common cause of parkinsonism, yet the diagnosis and management can be a challenge. The United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank Clinical Diagnostic Criteria and dopamine transporter/single-photon emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT) are diagnostic aids that can improve diagnostic accuracy. Even though PD is a progressive disease, for years, physicians and patients have delayed treatment until functional disability occurs. However, studies of monoamine oxidase-type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, dopamine agonists, and levodopa, all of which can be used as initial therapy, have demonstrated that PD patients receiving treatment do better than those who do not receive treatment, and some studies have shown that those receiving treatment earlier do better long term. Therefore, the management strategy for PD has moved toward earlier initiation of treatment. Although treatment for each patient should be individualized and based on their specific symptoms, severity, and lifestyle, in general MAO-B inhibitors may be used initially to treat mild symptoms, adding a dopamine agonist in younger patients or levodopa in older patients, as symptoms become more severe.