Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of bosentan and its interaction with ketoconazole

AIMS: The present study was conducted to characterize the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, and to investigate a possible pharmacokinetic interaction with ketoconazole. METHODS: In a randomized, two-way crossover study, 10 healthy male subjects received treatments A and B. Treatment A consisted of a single dose of 62.5 mg bosentan on day 1 followed by 62.5 mg twice daily for 5.5 days. Treatment B consisted of bosentan (62.5 mg twice daily) for 5.5 days plus concomitant ketoconazole (200 mg once daily) for 6 days. Plasma concentrations of bosentan and its three metabolites were measured on days 1 and 7 of treatment A and on day 6 of treatment B. RESULTS: Bosentan was absorbed and eliminated with a tmax of 4.5 h (range 3.5-6.0 h) and a t(1/2) of 5.4 h (95% CI; 4.5, 6.6). Upon multiple dosing, the exposure to bosentan was reduced by 33% without change in tmax and t(1/2). Concomitant administration of ketoconazole increased the Cmax and AUC of bosentan 2.1- (95% CI; 1.5, 2.7) and 2.3-fold (95% CI; 1.8, 2.9), respectively. Exposure to the metabolites was low and represented less than 25% of that to bosentan both after single and multiple doses. In the presence of ketoconazole, formation of the metabolites was inhibited. DISCUSSION: The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of bosentan are consistent with the phenomenon of auto-induction. In the presence of CYP3A4 inhibitors, bosentan concentrations may be increased 2-fold.     

The interaction of the calcium antagonist RO 40-5967 with digoxin.

1. The interaction of the newer calcium antagonist Ro 40-5967 with digoxin was investigated in 42 healthy subjects under steady state conditions. 2. After an adequate loading dose digoxin 0.375 mg once daily was given alone for 1 week. Afterwards three different doses (50, 100, 150 mg daily) of the calcium antagonist Ro 40-5967 were administered to three groups of 14 subjects each for 1 week concurrently with digoxin 0.375 mg daily. 3. Ro 40-5967 led to an increase of mean maximum digoxin plasma concentrations (Cmax) and AUC. For AUC this effect was significantly dose-dependent. 4. Increasing doses of the calcium antagonist led to a stepwise rise of the PQ-time in ECG. 5. A slight fall of heart rate was seen after a 7 day treatment of digoxin alone. This effect was more pronounced when Ro 40-5967 was added to the medication. No significant changes of stroke volume and blood pressure were noted. 6. In conclusion Ro 40-5967 led to a significant elevation of the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of digoxin. This effect was dose-dependent.     

Effect of the endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin.

To investigate the effects of bosentan (Ro 47-0203), an endothelin receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study was performed in 12 healthy male volunteers. All subjects received a single oral dose of 26 mg racemic warfarin twice, once in the morning of the 6th day of treatment with 500 mg bosentan twice daily for 10 days and once at the same time point during treatment with placebo twice daily for 10 days. Both treatments were separated by a 2- to 3-week washout period. Blood samples were collected at intervals up to 120 hours following the warfarin dose for the measurement of prothrombin time and factor VII activity and for determination of plasma concentrations of R- and S-warfarin. Bosentan treatment led to a statistically significant reduction of the maximal prothrombin time (PTmax) and the AUC0-120 h of PT and factor VII activity compared to placebo, on average, by 23% to 38%. This reduction could be explained by an increase in the elimination of the pharmacologically more active S-enantiomer whose mean AUC0-infinity was reduced by 29%. The mean AUC0-infinity of R-warfarin was also decreased by 38%. Cmax and tmax of both enantiomers did not change. Close monitoring in patients receiving warfarin is recommended at initiation or discontinuation of treatment with bosentan.     

Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics of budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler®

AIMS: The present pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to determine the dose proportionality of three different doses of budesonide-400 microg, 800 microg or 1600 microg administered twice daily by a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler ) in adult patients with mild asthma. METHODS: A total of 38 patients received budesonide by inhalation, 13 received 400 microg twice daily, 12 received 800 microg twice daily and 13 received 1600 microg twice daily. Mean FEV1 at inclusion was 3.4, 4.0 and 3.9 l min-1 in the three groups, respectively. Blood samples were taken after a single dose, and after 3 weeks of daily treatment, for pharmacokinetic evaluation. Plasma concentrations of budesonide were determined by liquid chromatography plus mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Eleven evaluable patients remained in each dose group. Mean time to peak budesonide plasma concentration (tmax ) was short (0.28-0.40 h) and did not differ between treatment groups. Budesonide concentrations declined rapidly thereafter, indicating efficient pulmonary absorption and rapid elimination with a half-life of approximately 3 h. Cmax was 1. 4(2.0) nmol l-1 (single (repeated) doses), 2.6(3.6) nmol l-1 and 5. 4(6.4) nmol l-1 after 400, 800 and 1600 microg twice daily, respectively. The corresponding results for the area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) were 271(325), 490(628) and 915(1096) nmol l-1 min. Ninety percent confidence intervals for pairwise dose-normalized Cmax and AUC comparisons between groups were large but contained unity in all cases, thus indicating dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. Regression on analysis supported these findings. Mean AUC after repeated doses (AUC(0,12 h,RD)) was on average 23% higher than the mean AUC after single doses (AUC(0, infinity,SD)(P=0.04) with no significant differences between doses, indicating slight accumulation following bid dosing. CONCLUSIONS: In this relatively small study, budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler appeared to have dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, both within and above the clinically recommended dose range for asthmatic patients.     

Bosentan decreases the plasma concentration of sildenafil when coprescribed in pulmonary hypertension

AIMS: To determine whether bosentan decreases the plasma concentration of sildenafil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. METHODS: Ten patients (aged 39-77 years) with pulmonary arterial hypertension in WHO functional class III received bosentan 62.5 mg twice daily for 1 month, then 125 mg twice daily for a second month. Sildenafil 100 mg was given as a single dose before starting bosentan (visit 1) and at the end of each month of bosentan treatment (visits 2 and 3). Sildenafil and its primary metabolite, desmethylsildenafil, were measured in plasma at 0 h and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18 and 24 h using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis was by repeated measures anova, using log transformed data where appropriate. RESULTS: Treatment with bosentan 62.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks was associated with a two-fold increase in sildenafil clearance/F and a 50% decrease in the AUC (P < 0.001). Increasing the dose of bosentan to 125 mg twice daily led to a further increase in sildenafil oral clearance and decrease in the AUC (P < 0.001 vs. 62.5 mg bosentan). The ratio of AUC on bosentan treatment relative to that of visit 1 was 0.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36, 0.61] for visit 2 and 0.31 (95% CI 0.23, 0.41) for visit 3 (P < 0.001). Sildenafil C(max) fell from 759 ng ml(-1) on visit 1 to 333 ng ml(-1) on visit 3 (P < 0.01) and there was a significant decrease in the plasma half-life of sildenafil on the higher bosentan dose (P < 0.05). The AUC and plasma half-life of desmethylsildenafil was also decreased by bosentan in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan significantly decreases the plasma concentration of sildenafil when coadministered to patients with pulmonary hypertension.     

Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics of lamivudine during twice and once daily administration in patients with HIV

OBJECTIVE: To compare the plasma pharmacokinetics of lamivudine 150mg twice daily and 300mg once daily in patients with HIV-1 infection. DESIGN: Nonblind, sequential, pharmacokinetic study. PARTICIPANTS: 13 patients with HIV-1 infection (median age 36 years). METHODS: Patients were tested during twice daily and then once daily regimens of lamivudine. In both regimens, the total daily dose of lamivudine was identical (300 mg/day). Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken over a 12-hour period after > or =7 days of twice daily administration, and again over a 24-hour period after 7 days of once daily administration,. RESULTS: 12 patients completed the study. Lamivudine pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) after administration of 150mg twice daily were: peak plasma concentration (Cmax) 2077+/-816 microg/L; trough plasma concentration (Cmin) 332+/-219 microg/L; elimination half-life (t 1/2beta) 6.1+/-1.9h; time to Cmax (t(max)) 1.6+/-0.7h; average concentration over the dosage interval (Cav) 711+/-269 microg/L; and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over 2 dosage intervals (24h) 17085+/-6464 microg x h/L. Corresponding values after administration of 300mg once daily were: Cmax 3461+/-854 microg/L; Cmin 146+/-87 microg/L; t1/2 7.9+/-3.4h; t(max) 2.2+/-1.3h; Cav 705+/-177 microg/L; and AUC over 1 dosage interval (24h) 16644+/-4150 microg x h/L. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 2 schedules for Cmax and Cmin values, whereas no significant differences emerged for the other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily lamivudine leads to a similar exposure in plasma as twice daily administration of the same total daily dose. Since once daily administration may result in improved compliance, these results provide the pharmacokinetic basis for using lamivudine in a once daily regimen. Randomised clinical studies are needed to confirm this pharmacokinetic finding.     

Effect of exenatide on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin

This open-label study investigated the effect of exenatide coadministration on the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of digoxin. A total of 21 healthy male subjects received digoxin (day 1, 0.5 mg twice daily; days 2-12, 0.25 mg once daily) and exenatide (days 8-12, 10 microg twice daily). Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were measured on days 7 and 12. Exenatide coadministration did not change the overall 24-hour steady-state digoxin exposure (AUCtau,ss) and Cmin,ss but caused a 17% decrease in mean plasma digoxin Cmax,ss (1.40 to 1.16 ng/mL) and an increase in digoxin tmax,ss (median increase, 2.5 hours). Although the decrease in digoxin Cmax,ss was statistically significant, peak concentrations were within the therapeutic concentration range in all subjects. Digoxin urinary pharmacokinetic parameters were not altered. Gastrointestinal symptoms, the most common adverse effects of exenatide, decreased over time. Exenatide administration does not cause any changes in digoxin steady-state pharmacokinetics that would be expected to have clinical sequelae; thus, dosage adjustment does not appear warranted, based on pharmacokinetic considerations.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of concomitant mibefradil-digoxin therapy at therapeutic doses.

This study investigated the effect of mibefradil on digoxin pharmacokinetics an pharmacodynamics. Following a loading dose of digoxin (0.375 mg, three times, day 1), 0.375 mg was administered once daily to 40 healthy subjects (days 2-15). Mibefradil was administered daily at 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg (days 9-15). With co-administration of 50 mg or 100 mg mibefradil (the recommended doses), mean digoxin Cmax values increased 1.19- and 1.32-fold, respectively; Cmin values were 0.95- and 1.04-fold, respectively; mean AUC0-24 h increased 1.05- and 1.11-fold, respectively; and the total amount of digoxin excreted in urine remained unchanged. Digoxin monotherapy produced modest but transient prolongations of PQ interval, small decreases in heart rate, and no changes in blood pressure. With the addition of mibefradil, no effects on trough blood pressure or cardiac index were observed, but there was a further increase in PQ interval and decrease in heart rate. In a previous study, mibefradil had no significant effect on trough plasma digoxin concentration in patients with congestive heart failure and ischemia. Therefore, while the vast majority of patients should not need their digoxin dosages adjusted when given mibefradil, an occasional patient may require dose reductions based on clinical response and plasma digoxin.     

Effect of bosentan on leptin and endothelin‐1 concentration in plasma and brain after cardiac arrest in rats

In previous studies, bosentan was found to decrease plasma leptin concentrations after myocardial infarction (MI) in rats and had decreased mortality. The present study was undertaken to examine the effect of bosentan on leptin and endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) concentrations in plasma and ET‐1 concentrations in the hippocampus after cardiac arrest (CA) in rats. Studies were performed in 72 rats divided into treated and untreated animals in the following experimental groups: control, 3 min, 10 min, 1 h, 24 h, and 7 days after CA. Bosentan was given daily 2 h before CA or decapitation, 7 days, by gavage at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Plasma leptin concentration decreased in the early period after CA, and being elevated in 24 h, normalized 1 week later. Bosentan kept plasma leptin concentration at the control level in the postischemic period. Plasma ET‐1 concentration significantly increased during the postischemic period. Bosentan produced the elevation of plasma ET‐1 concentration in the preischemic period and kept the level of ET‐1 at control values after CA. Concentration of ET‐1 in the hippocampus was significantly lower 24 h after CA and was elevated after 1 week. The most dramatic effect of bosentan on ET‐1 concentration was in the hippocampus, where it significantly decreased during the entire postischemic recovery period. We postulate an important effect of bosentan on concentration of ET‐1 and leptin in plasma and ET‐1 in the brain after global cerebral ischemia caused by CA. Drug Dev Res 64:137–144, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between bosentan and the oral contraceptives norethisterone and ethinyl estradiol

OBJECTIVE: Bosentan has been shown in vitro and in vivo to induce the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of bosentan on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, 2-way crossover study, 20 healthy female subjects received Treatments A and B. Treatment A consisted of a single dose of OrthoNovum containing 1 mg norethisterone (norethindrone) and 35 microg ethinyl estradiol. Treatment B consisted of bosentan, 125 mg b.i.d. for 7 days plus concomitant norethisterone and ethinyl estradiol on Day 7. Plasma concentrations of norethisterone and ethinyl estradiol were measured on days of oral contraceptive administration. RESULTS: In the absence of bosentan, the pharmacokinetics of norethisterone and ethinyl estradiol were characterized by Cmax and AUC0-infinity values (95% CI) of 9.8 (8.1, 11.9) ng/ml and 72.9 (57.0, 93.1) ng x h/ml, and 53.0 (47.0, 59.9) pg/ml and 758 (655, 878) pg x h/ml, respectively. Concomitant bosentan did not affect the Cmax but significantly decreased the AUC of norethisterone and ethinyl estradiol by 13.7% (-23.5, -2.6) and 31.0% (-40.5,-20.2), respectively. The maximum decrease in AUC of norethisterone and ethinyl estradiol in an individual subject was 56% and 66%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan decreases the AUC of norethisterone and ethinyl estradiol in healthy female subjects. In patients treated with bosentan, reduced efficacy of hormonal contraceptives should be considered.     

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dofetilide after twice daily and three times daily dosing

AIMS: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dofetilide, a novel, class III antiarrhythmic drug, were assessed during administration either twice or three times daily. METHODS: Dofetilide was administered orally to three groups of healthy subjects in daily doses of 1000 microg (n = 8), 1500 microg (n = 8), or 2500 microg (n = 9) as twice daily and three times daily treatment regimens, with the two regimens assigned randomly as a two-way crossover for each subject and separated by at least a 6 day washout period. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated a rise in plasma dofetilide concentrations until steady state was attained on day 3. Ctrough had a linear dependence on dose for both the twice daily and three times daily dosing regimens. The maximum concentration attained (Cmax) and the area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC(0,tau) increased linearly with dose for each dosing regimen on both days 1 and 5 of dosing. Cmax occurred at 2 h. Pharmacodynamic measurements showed that the QTc interval increased in a dose-dependent manner and that the time to maximum QTc was 2 h after dosing. A linear relationship was determined between plasma dofetilide concentration and the prolongation of the QTc interval. The slope of this line was significantly greater on day 1 (ranging from 12.9 to 14.2 ms/ng ml-1) than on day 5 (ranging from 9.9 to 12. 8 ms/ng ml(-1). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dofetilide are predictable and based on a linear relationship for both twice daily and three times daily dosing regimens. The QT responsiveness to dofetilide is greater on day 1 than on day 5.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between tadalafil and bosentan in healthy male subjects

Tadalafil, an oral phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, is being investigated as a treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Bosentan is an oral endothelin receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Tadalafil is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, and as bosentan induces CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, a pharmacokinetic interaction is possible between these agents. This open-label, randomized study investigated whether any pharmacokinetic interaction exists between tadalafil and bosentan. Healthy adult men (n = 15; 19-52 years of age) received 10 consecutive days of tadalafil 40 mg once daily, bosentan 125 mg twice daily, and a combination of both in a 3-period, crossover design. Following 10 days of multiple-dose coadministration of bosentan and tadalafil, compared with tadalafil alone, tadalafil geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) for AUCtau and Cmax were 0.59 (0.55, 0.62) and 0.73 (0.68, 0.79), respectively, with no observed change in tmax. Following coadministration of bosentan with tadalafil, bosentan ratios (90% CI) for AUCtau and Cmax were 1.13 (1.02, 1.24) and 1.20 (1.05, 1.36), respectively. Tadalafil alone and combined with bosentan was generally well tolerated. In conclusion, after 10 days of coadministration, bosentan decreased tadalafil exposure by 41.5% with minimal and clinically irrelevant differences (<20%) in bosentan exposure.     

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nifedipine at steady state during concomitant administration of cimetidine or high dose ranitidine.

Ranitidine may be used at doses of up to 300 mg twice daily in the healing of duodenal ulcers, and this study investigated the potential for a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between nifedipine 10 mg three times daily and ranitidine 300 mg twice daily compared with cimetidine 800 mg daily and placebo in a randomised crossover study in 18 healthy male subjects. Twelve blood samples were taken on the fifth day in each treatment period and assayed for nifedipine by h.p.l.c. Pulse, blood pressure and ECG recordings were also taken. Cimetidine, but not ranitidine, produced significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine at steady state. Mean +/- s.d. values of AUC were 105 +/- 40 micrograms l-1 for placebo treatment, 111 +/- 45 micrograms l-1 h for ranitidine and 211 +/- 64 micrograms l-1 h for cimetidine (P less than 0.001), and Cmax values were 33 +/- 14, 39 +/- 27 and 76 +/- 40 micrograms l-1 (P less than 0.001), respectively. Neither ranitidine nor cimetidine produced statistically significant changes in the pharmacological response to nifedipine.     

Clinical pharmacology of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist

Bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Following oral administration, bosentan attains peak plasma concentrations after approximately 3 hours. The absolute bioavailability is about 50%. Food does not exert a clinically relevant effect on absorption at the recommended dose of 125 mg. Bosentan is approximately 98% bound to albumin and, during multiple-dose administration, has a volume of distribution of 30 L and a clearance of 17 L/h. The terminal half-life after oral administration is 5.4 hours and is unchanged at steady state. Steady-state concentrations are achieved within 3-5 days after multiple-dose administration, when plasma concentrations are decreased by about 50% because of a 2-fold increase in clearance, probably due to induction of metabolising enzymes. Bosentan is mainly eliminated from the body by hepatic metabolism and subsequent biliary excretion of the metabolites. Three metabolites have been identified, formed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4. The metabolite Ro 48-5033 may contribute 20% to the total response following administration of bosentan. The pharmacokinetics of bosentan are dose-proportional up to 600 mg (single dose) and 500 mg/day (multiple doses). The pharmacokinetics of bosentan in paediatric PAH patients are comparable to those in healthy subjects, whereas adult PAH patients show a 2-fold increased exposure. Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 15-30 mL/min) and mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A) do not have a clinically relevant influence on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. No dosage adjustment in adults is required based on sex, age, ethnic origin and bodyweight. Bosentan should generally be avoided in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment and/or elevated liver aminotransferases. Ketoconazole approximately doubles the exposure to bosentan because of inhibition of CYP3A4. Bosentan decreases exposure to ciclosporin, glibenclamide, simvastatin (and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin) and (R)- and (S)-warfarin by up to 50% because of induction of CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C9. Coadministration of ciclosporin and bosentan markedly increases initial bosentan trough concentrations. Concomitant treatment with glibenclamide and bosentan leads to an increase in the incidence of aminotransferase elevations. Therefore, combined use with ciclosporin and glibenclamide is contraindicated and not recommended, respectively. The possibility of reduced efficacy of CYP2C9 and 3A4 substrates should be considered when coadministered with bosentan. No clinically relevant interaction was detected with the P-glycoprotein substrate digoxin. In healthy subjects, bosentan doses >300 mg increase plasma levels of endothelin-1. The drug moderately reduces blood pressure, and its main adverse effects are headache, flushing, increased liver aminotransferases, leg oedema and anaemia. In a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study in PAH patients, the haemodynamic effects lagged the plasma concentrations of bosentan.     

MDR1 genotypes do not influence the absorption of a single oral dose of 1 mg digoxin in healthy white males

AIMS: A noncoding single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in exon 26 3435C > T of the highly polymorphic MDR1 gene has been demonstrated to alter digoxin absorption after induction of the MDR1 gene product P-glycoprotein by rifampicin or after multiple oral dosing. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of the major known MDR1 SNPs on the absorption of digoxin after a single oral dose in a large sample without drug pretreatment. METHODS: Fifty healthy white male subjects between the age of 18 and 40 years were enrolled. Following an overnight fast, all subjects received a single oral dose of 1 mg digoxin. Venous blood samples were taken at intervals up to 4 h post dose to obtain a pharmacokinetic profile. RESULTS: AUC(0,4 h), Cmax and tmax, used as indices of digoxin absorption, were not significantly different in any of the genotype groups tested. In particular, there was no significant difference between homozygous carriers of the C and T allele in exon 26 3435 (AUC(0,4 h) 9.24 and 9.38 micro g l-1 h, Cmax 4.73 and 3.81 micro g l-1, tmax 0,83 and 01.14 h). CONCLUSIONS: This lack of effect of the major MDR1 SNPs on digoxin absorption might be explained by saturation of the maximum transport capacity of intestinal Pgp at the dose used.     

Naproxen kinetics in synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis.

1. The kinetics of naproxen in synovial fluid were studied in 407 osteoarthritic outpatients with knee effusion requiring aspiration, following a single 1100 mg oral dose of naproxen sodium. 2. The drug concentration-time profiles were described by a biexponential function. Naproxen entered synovial fluid rapidly, reaching a maximum concentration of 36 mg l-1 (Cmax) at 7.5 h. The first order input rate constant (kOs) was 0.41 +/- 0.15 h-1 with a lag time (tlag) of 0.24 +/- 0.36 h. 3. Elimination from the fluid was slow (t1/2 = 31 +/- 12 h) and appreciable drug concentrations were still measurable (27 mg l-1) after 24 h. 4. During once daily dosing of naproxen sodium, naproxen should accumulate in synovial fluid, a steady-state being achieved within a week of treatment. The predicted accumulation ratio based on trough concentration was 2.4.     

Pharmacokinetics of SDZ RAD and cyclosporin including their metabolites in seven kidney graft patients after the first dose of SDZ RAD

AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the new immunosuppressant SDZ RAD during concomitant therapy with cyclosporin in stable renal transplant patients. Furthermore, we studied the influence of SDZ RAD on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin at steady state levels. METHODS: SDZ RAD was administered orally in different doses (0.25-15 mg day-1) to seven patients, who were on standard cyclosporin-based immunosuppression. The blood concentrations of both drugs including their main groups of metabolites were measured simultaneously by LC/electrospray-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The mean area under the blood concentration-time curve to 12 h (AUC(0,12 h)) was 4244 +/- 1311 microg l-1 h for cyclosporin before SDZ RAD treatment and 4683 +/- 1174 microg l-1 h (P = 0.106) on the day of SDZ RAD treatment (95% CI for difference -126, 1003). On both study days Cmax, and tmax of cyclosporin were not significantly different. The metabolite pattern of cyclosporin did not change. The pharmacokinetic data of SDZ RAD dose-normalized to 1 mg SDZ RAD were as follows: AUC(0,24 h): 35.4 +/- 13.1 microg l-1 h, Cmax: 7.9 +/- 2.7 microg l-1 and tmax: 1.5 +/- 0.9 h. The metabolites of SDZ RAD found in blood were hydroxy-SDZ RAD, dihydroxy-SDZ RAD, demethyl-SDZ RAD, and a ring-opened form of SDZ RAD. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of SDZ RAD did not influence significantly the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin. The most important metabolite of SDZ RAD was the hydroxy-SDZ RAD, its AUC(0,24 h) being nearly half that of the parent compound SDZ RAD.     

Long-term trial of bosentan monotherapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in Japanese patients

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of long-term bosentan monotherapy in Japanese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Research design and methods: The present study was an extension to a 12?week open-label trial of bosentan in which 21 Japanese patients with PAH received bosentan, 125?mg twice daily. Of the 21 patients in the initial trial, 20 elected to participate in the long-term study and to continue to receive bosentan for up to 3 years.

Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy measure was comparison of World Health Organization (WHO) functional class for pulmonary arterial hypertension following long-term (> 2.5 years) therapy compared with baseline (prior to initiation of bosentan). Secondary outcomes included time from initiation of bosentan therapy to clinical worsening and safety assessments.

Results: Bosentan treatment was continued for a median of 2.7 years (range 0.4–3.0 years); 12 patients received bosentan monotherapy for at least 2.5 years. Following long-term treatment, improvement of WHO functional class compared with baseline was observed in 9/12 patients (75.0%) and in 3/12 patients (25.0%) the functional class remained stable; no patient experienced a worsening of WHO functional class compared with baseline. Overall, long-term treatment with bosentan was well tolerated.

Conclusions: Long-term treatment with bosentan is well tolerated and is associated with sustained clinical improvement in Japanese patients with PAH. Bosentan, therefore, represents a valuable treatment option for Japanese patients with this devastating disease.     

A randomized controlled assessment of the effects of different dosing regimens of budesonide on the HPA-axis in healthy subjects

AIMS: To investigate the effect on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of treatment with budesonide, 400 microg once daily, morning or evening, or 200 microg twice daily, and 800 microg twice daily via Turbuhaler in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy crossover study. METHODS: Healthy men received budesonide, 400 microg in the morning (08.00-09.00 h) or evening (20.00-21.00 h), budesonide, 200 microg twice daily, 800 microg twice daily, and placebo twice daily, for 1 week each. Plasma and urine samples were obtained over 24 h on day 7 for cortisol determination. Twenty-five subjects completed all treatments, and 27 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The 24 h plasma cortisol concentrations vs placebo (95% CI) were 98% (89, 108) for 400 microg in the morning, 92% (83, 100) for 400 microg in the evening, 95% (86, 104) for 200 microg twice daily, and 76% (70, 84) for 800 microg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide at a dose of 400 microg day-1 via Turbuhaler had no statistically significant effect on 24 h cortisol production, irrespective of whether treatment is given once or twice daily, whereas a dose of 800 microg twice daily resulted in a statistically significant suppression vs placebo. Neither could a significant difference be found between morning and evening dosing.     

Inhibition of gastric secretion following single morning or twice daily oral administration of sufotidine to volunteers.

1. The inhibitory effect of sufotidine, a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist, on gastric secretion of acid and pepsin was studied in six healthy male volunteers. This was a three-way, cross-over, randomized, double-blind study. On each of 3 study days, the drug in a dose of 600 mg, or placebo, was administered either once or twice daily at 08.00 and 20.00 h. 2. The morning dose of sufotidine maintained intragastric pH above 3 until 18.00 h. Twice daily sufotidine maintained the pH above 3 throughout the 24 h. The median 24 h concentration of acid was significantly reduced from 86.9 mmol l-1 after placebo to 22.8 mmol l-1 and 4.9 mmol l-1 following the morning only or twice daily dose of sufotidine, respectively. Mean night-time output of acid was reduced by 81% after the morning dose of sufotidine and by 97% following treatment with sufotidine twice daily. 3. We conclude that sufotidine, in the doses studied, markedly inhibits gastric secretion and may therefore prove useful in the treatment of peptic ulceration and oesophagitis.