Efficacy of vinorelbine, epirubicin and prednisone combination regimen in pretreated elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and toxic profile of the NAEPP protocol, a regimen including vinorelbine, epirubicin and prednisone, in a particularly troublesome subset of patients: pretreated elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). DESIGN AND METHODS: From November 1998 to January 2000, 20 pretreated patients who had all relapsed after first-line VNCOP-B chemotherapy were enrolled in a phase II trial and treated with the NAEPP regimen: vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8), epirubicin (40 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8), and prednisone (40 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administered at 5 mg/kg/day on days 2-5 and days 9-12. Chemotherapy was repeated every 4 weeks for a total of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Six (30%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) and 7 (35%) had partial responses (PR), giving an overall response rate of 65%. The response rate was not affected either by type of relapse presentation (nodal versus nodal plus extranodal), presence of bulky disease, or time of relapse. No major toxic effects were recorded. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that the NAEPP regimen is an effective combination with a low toxicity profile in elderly pretreated patients with aggressive NHL. Further trials using NAEPP as a consolidation phase following first-line treatment are needed to establish the advantage in terms of CR rate and relapse-free survival in these patients.     

CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) during induction chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone) or CNOP (doxorubicin replaced with mitoxantrone) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) improves time to treatment failure (TTF), complete remission (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the efficacy of CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy was compared. A total of 455 previously untreated patients older than 60 years with stages II to IV aggressive NHL were included in the analysis. Patients (median age, 71 years; range, 60-86 years) were randomized to receive CHOP (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2)) or CNOP (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2)) with or without G-CSF (5 microg/kg from day 2 until day 10-14 of each cycle every 3 weeks; 8 cycles). Forty-seven patients previously hospitalized for class I to II congestive heart failure were randomized to receive CNOP with or without G-CSF (not included in the CHOP versus CNOP analysis). The CR rates in the CHOP/CNOP plus G-CSF and CHOP/CNOP groups were the same, 52%, and in the CHOP with or without G-CSF and CNOP with or without G-CSF groups, 60% and 43% (P <.001), respectively. No benefit of G-CSF in terms of TTF and OS could be shown (P =.96 and P =.22, respectively), whereas CHOP was superior to CNOP (TTF/OS P <.001). The incidences of severe granulocytopenia (World Health Organization grade IV) and granulocytopenic infections were higher in patients not receiving G-CSF. The cumulative proportion of patients receiving 90% or more of allocated chemotherapy was higher (P <.05) in patients receiving G-CSF. Concomitant G-CSF treatment did not improve CR rate, TTF, or OS. Patients receiving CHOP fared better than those given CNOP chemotherapy. The addition of G-CSF reduces the incidence of severe granulocytopenia and infections in elderly patients with aggressive NHL receiving CHOP or CNOP chemotherapy.     

Nonablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: dose is relevant for long-term disease control after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Intensity of the preparative regimen is an important component of allogeneic transplantations for myelodysplasia (MDS) or acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We compared outcomes after a truly nonablative regimen (120 mg/m2 fludarabine, 4 g/m2 cytarabine, and 36 mg/m2 idarubicin [FAI]) and a more myelosuppressive, reduced-intensity regimen (100 to 150 mg/m2 fludarabine and 140 or 180 mg/m2 melphalan [FM]). We performed a retrospective analysis of 94 patients with MDS (n = 26) and AML (n = 68) treated with FM (n = 62) and FAI (n = 32). The FAI group had a higher proportion of patients in complete remission (CR) at transplantation (44% versus 16%, P =.006), patients in first CR (28% versus 3%, P =.008), and HLA-matched sibling donors (81% versus 40%, P =.001). Median follow-up is 40 months. FM was significantly associated with a higher degree of donor cell engraftment, higher cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM; P =.036), and lower cumulative incidence of relapse-related mortality (P =.029). Relapse rate after FAI and FM was 61% and 30%, respectively. Actuarial 3-year survival rate was 30% after FAI and 35% following FM. In a multivariate analysis of patient- and treatment-related prognostic factors, progression-free survival was improved after FM, for patients in CR at transplantation, and for those with intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Survival was improved for patients in CR at transplantation. In conclusion, FM provided better disease control though at a cost of increased TRM and morbidity.     

Rituximab improves the treatment results of DHAP-VIM-DHAP and ASCT in relapsed/progressive aggressive CD20+ NHL: a prospective randomized HOVON trial

We evaluated the role of rituximab during remission induction chemotherapy in relapsed aggressive CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Of 239 patients, 225 were evaluable for analysis. Randomized to DHAP (cisplatin-cytarabine-dexamethasone)-VIM (etoposide-ifosfamide-methotrexate)-DHAP (cisplatin-cytarabine-dexamethasone) chemotherapy with rituximab (R; R-DHAP arm) were 119 patients (113 evaluable) and to chemotherapy without rituximab (DHAP arm) 120 patients (112 evaluable). Patients in complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) after 2 chemotherapy courses were eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. After the second chemotherapy cycle, 75% of the patients in the R-DHAP arm had responsive disease (CR or PR) versus 54% in the DHAP arm (P=.01). With a median follow-up of 24 months, there was a significant difference in failure-free survival (FFS24; 50% vs 24% vs, P<.001), and progression free survival (PFS24; 52% vs 31% P<.002) in favor of the R-DHAP arm. Cox-regression analysis demonstrated a significant effect of rituximab treatment on FFS24 (HR 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.57 versus 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.70) and overall-survival (OS24: HR 0.60 [0.41-0.89] vs 0.76 [0.52-1.10]) when adjusted for time since upfront treatment, age, World Health Organization performance status, and secondary age-adjusted international prognostic index. These results demonstrate improved FFS and PFS for relapsed aggressive B-cell NHL if rituximab is added to the re-induction chemotherapy regimen.     

Prospective karyotype analysis in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the cancer and leukemia Group B experience.

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) has been conducting a prospective cytogenetic companion study (CALGB 8461) to all CALGB treatment protocols for newly diagnosed adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). These protocols underwent a significant change in 1988 when a new intensive chemotherapy program was introduced (CALGB 8811). We asked whether karyotype continued to represent a significant prognostic factor in adult ALL patients after the change. A total of 256 patients had adequate pretreatment cytogenetic analyses: 67 before 1988 and 189 subsequently. The complete remission (CR) rate for the whole group was 80%. Patients with t(9;22), t(4;11), -7, or +8 had significantly lower probabilities of continuous CR and survival at 5 years (.11 and.12) than patients with a normal karyotype (.38 and.37) and patients with miscellaneous cytogenetic abnormalities (.52 and.49; P <.001 for each comparison). When analyzed by treatment period, the CR rate before CALGB 8811 was 63%; subsequently, it was 86% (P <.001). Patients with cytogenetic abnormalities other than t(9;22), t(4;11), -7, or +8 had better CR rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and survivals (P =.001, P =.04, and P =.004, respectively) after the change to the more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Patients with normal cytogenetics had improved CR rate but no improved DFS or survival, whereas no significant benefit for patients with t(9;22), t(4;11), -7, or +8 was seen. In a multivariate analysis, karyotype retained its prognostic significance for DFS but not for survival; it remained the most important factor for DFS. We conclude that cytogenetic analysis at diagnosis should be used to guide treatment decisions in adults with ALL.     

Early FDG-PET assessment in combination with clinical risk scores determines prognosis in recurring lymphoma

This study was set up to demonstrate whether prognostic classification based on the secondary age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (sAA-IPI) for recurring aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or the prognostic score for recurring Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) can be improved by including the midtreatment results of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Clinical data on patients with recurring lymphoma who were treated with second-line chemotherapy (DHAP-VIM-DHAP) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were collected and combined with the results of FDG-PET performed before and after 2 cycles of reinduction chemotherapy. PET responses after 2 courses were scored as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), or no response (NR). A multivariate analysis was performed to design a predictive model. The number of patients (101 of 117) included those (78 patients with aggressive NHL and 23 patients with HL) that could be analyzed according to protocol. Of these, 80 patients were chemosensitive and 77 received transplants. Both secondary clinical risk score (P<.001) and FDG-PET response (P<.001) were independent predictive factors for the total evaluable group of patients with lymphoma and for patients with NHL alone. The combined use of the clinical risk score and FDG-PET response after 2 chemotherapy courses identified at least 4 categories of patients with a failure-free survival varying between 5% to 100% after transplantation (P<.001). These data indicate that the secondary clinical risk score in conjunction with FDG-PET response provides a more accurate prognostic instrument for the outcome of second-line treatment at least in patients with recurring NHL.     

The Role of Intensive Therapy and Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplantation for Chemotherapy-Sensitive Relapsed and Primary Refractory Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Identification of Major Prognostic Groups

Patients with intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who relapse or fail to achieve a complete remission after anthracycline-containing induction regimens have a poor outcome with conventional-dose salvage treatment. This outcome may be improved with intensive therapy and autologous transplantation (ABMT) but even in patients with proven chemotherapy-sensitive disease, relapse rates of up to 60% are observed. Reliable and powerful prognostic indicators are needed to identify appropriate patients for this expensive procedure and those subjects to whom alternative or additional treatment should be offered. We were interested in testing the hypothesis that tumour burden, and hence remission status immediately prior to transplant, is an important prognostic indicator of survival. We aggressively treated patients with conventional-dose salvage chemotherapy to maximum tumour response, and tested, by multivariate regression analysis, predictors of outcome post-transplant. We studied 81 consecutive patients with intermediate grade and immunoblastic NHL who achieved either a partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) following repetitive cycles of conventional-dose salvage therapy. Intensive therapy consisted of etoposide (60 mg/kg) and intravenous melphalan (160–180 mg/m²) with or without total body irradiation (TBI) followed by infusion of autologous unpurged bone marrow and/or blood cells. The predicted 4-year survival and progression-free survival (PFS) with a median follow-up of 37 months was 58% and 48% (95% confidence interval (CI) 37–55%), respectively. The only factor predictive of outcome was remission status at transplant (P = 0.0001). The PFS at 4 years for the CR group was 61% (95% CI 53–75%). In contrast, only 25% (95% CI 11–40%) of patients undergoing autotransplant in PR were progression free at 4 years. We conclude that remission status at transplant after maximum tumour reduction is a powerful prognostic indicator.     

MDR1 protein expression is an independent predictor of complete remission in newly diagnosed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Little is known about the prognostic role of multidrug resistance (MDR) in adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the context of the GIMEMA ALL0496 protocol, we evaluated the impact of MDR1 (protein expression and function) on the achievement of complete remission (CR) and clinical outcome. Flow cytometric analysis of MDR1 expression (D) and function (rhodamine-123 efflux) was obtained in 203 and 158 patients, respectively. MDR1 expression was detected in 44 (21.7%) of 203 patients, and function was found in 23 (14.6%) of 158 (14.6%) patients. Expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) and lung-resistance protein (LRP) evaluated in 43 samples was found in 13 and 26 patients, respectively. Among the 200 patients evaluable for the clinical correlation study, 125 (79.6%) of 157 without MDR1 expression achieved CR compared with 23 (53.5%) of 43 with MDR1 expression (P =.001). At univariate analysis, MDR1 expression was significantly associated with CR when considered as a dichotomized (P =.001) or continuous (P =.01) variable. At multivariate analysis, dichotomized evaluation of MDR1 expression independently predicted CR (P =.004) with age (P =.03) and CD34 (P =.03); as a continuous variable, MDR1 expression (P =.03) was the only significant factor other than CD34 (P =.01). MDR1 function failed to predict achievement of CR or of MRP1 and LRP expression. MDR1 expression did not correlate with CR duration, nor did it predict for survival duration. These results demonstrate that MDR1 expression in de novo adult ALL is an independent predictor of CR achievement.     

Treatment outcome and prognostic factors for relapse after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell rescue for patients with poor risk high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The aim of the study was to determine treatment outcome and identify a particularly high risk group in a consecutive series of 66 patients with poor prognosis high grade lymphoma (NHL) treated with conventional induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) rescue. Fifty-one patients with intermediate grade NHL (Kiel) and two or three adverse prognostic features as defined by the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) received induction treatment with 7 weeks of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, prednisolone and methotrexate (VAPEC-B) followed by three cycles of ifosfamide/cytarabine. Fifteen patients with high grade Burkitt's and lymphoblastic NHL received 11 weeks of VAPEC-B followed by three cycles of high-dose methotrexate. HDCT for all 66 patients consisted of busulphan/cyclophosphamide followed by autologous PBSC rescue. Thirty-one patients (47%) received HDCT in first complete remission (CR/CRu) and 34 patients (52%) in first partial remission (PR) after conventional chemotherapy. Following HDCT, 42 patients (64%) were in CR/CRu, 19 patients (29%) in PR and one patient had progressive disease. There were four toxic deaths. After a median follow-up period of 27 months (range 7-73) in 46 surviving patients, the actuarial 3-year estimates of overall survival, event-free survival (EFS) and freedom from progression (FFP) were 67%, 65% and 70%, respectively. In univariate analysis, prognostic factors associated with reduced EFS were mediastinal bulk (P = 0.02), > or = 3 extra-nodal sites (P = 0.02), remission status prior to HDCT (P = 0.05), low albumin (P = 0.08) and raised ESR (P = 0.09). No significant difference was observed between patients with intermediate or high grade NHL or between patients with two or three adverse IPI features. Multivariate analysis identified mediastinal bulk (P = 0.01), > or = 3 extra-nodal sites (P = 0.01) and low albumin (P = 0.03) as joint predictors of poor EFS. Remission status prior to HDCT was not found to be significantly associated with reduced EFS, FFP or survival, suggesting early introduction of HDCT may benefit patients with a PR. Based on these three adverse features, three groups (0, 1 or > or = 2 features) could be identified with differing EFS, survival and freedom from progression (FFP) rates at 3 years; 85%, 63% and 20%, respectively for EFS, 84%, 64% and 25% for survival and 85%, 66% and 33%, respectively for FFP. This prognostic model may identify patients with a particularly poor prognosis despite HDCT, who may benefit from other therapeutic approaches.     

Early immunophenotypical evaluation of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia identifies different patient risk groups and may contribute to postinduction treatment stratification

Early response to therapy is one of the most important prognostic factors in acute leukemia. It is hypothesized that early immunophenotypical evaluation may help identify patients at high risk for relapse from those who may remain in complete remission (CR). Using multiparametric flow cytometry, the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) was evaluated in the first bone marrow (BM) in morphologic CR obtained after induction treatment from 126 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who displayed aberrant phenotypes at diagnosis. Based on MRD level, 4 different risk categories were identified: 8 patients were at very low risk (fewer than 10(-4) cells), and none have relapsed thus far; 37 were at low risk (10(-4) to 10(-3) cells); and 64 were at intermediate risk (fewer than 10(-3) to 10(-2) cells), with 3-year cumulative relapse rates of 14% and 50%, respectively. The remaining 17 patients were in the high-risk group (more than 10(-2) residual aberrant cells) and had a 3-year relapse rate of 84% (P =.0001). MRD level not only influences relapse-free survival but also overall survival (P =.003). The adverse prognostic impact was also observed when M3 and non-M3 patients with AML were separately analyzed, and was associated with adverse cytogenetic subtypes, 2 or more cycles to achieve CR, and high white blood cell counts. Multivariate analysis showed that MRD level was the most powerful independent prognostic factor, followed by cytogenetics and number of cycles to achieve CR. In conclusion, immunophenotypical investigation of MRD in the first BM in mCR obtained after AML induction therapy provides important information for risk assessment in patients with AML.     

Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study

We compared the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with intensified chemotherapy alone in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma. There were 261 eligible patients younger than 66 years with stage II/III multiple myeloma who were randomized after remission induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) to receive intensified chemotherapy, that is, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) administered intravenously in 2 doses of 70 mg/m(2) (intermediate-dose melphalan [IDM]) without stem cell rescue (n = 129) or the same regimen followed by myeloablative therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and autologous stem cell reinfusion (n = 132). Interferon-alpha-2a was given as maintenance. Of the eligible patients, 79% received both cycles of IDM and 79% of allocated patients actually received myeloablative treatment. The response rate (complete remission [CR] plus partial remission [PR]) was 88% in the intensified chemotherapy group versus 95% in the myeloablative treatment group. CR was significantly higher after myeloablative therapy (13% versus 29%; P =.002). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 8-65 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was not different between the treatments (median 21 months versus 22 months; P =.28). Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer after myeloablative treatment (25 months versus 31 months; P =.04). The overall survival (OS) was not different (50 months versus 47 months; P =.41). Intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy as first-line treatment for multiple myeloma resulted in a higher CR and a longer TTP when compared with intensified chemotherapy alone. However, it did not result in a better EFS and OS.     

Primary nasal natural killer cell lymphoma: long-term treatment outcome and relationship with the International Prognostic Index

Nasal natural killer (NK) cell lymphoma is rare, so that its optimal therapy, long-term outcome, and prognostic factors are unclear. Data on 52 men and 15 women with well-characterized nasal NK cell lymphomas were analyzed retrospectively to define the impact of primary therapy on remission and long-term outcome and the validity of the International Prognostic Index (IPI). Most (84%) had stage I/II disease with an IPI score of 1 or less (52%). Seven patients received radiotherapy only; 47 patients received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy plus consolidation radiotherapy; and 12 patients received nonanthracycline-containing chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. The overall complete remission (CR) rate was 64.2%; the 20-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 37.1% and 33.5%, respectively. Front-line radiotherapy was apparently better than chemotherapy for CR (100% versus 59%, P =.04) and OS (83.3% versus 32.0%, P =.03). Relapses occurred in 4 radiotherapy-treated (all local) and 14 chemotherapy-treated patients (9 local, 4 systemic). Among these, 5 late relapses (4 local, 1 systemic) occurred at 170 months (range, 92-348 months) from CR. The IPI score was of prognostic significance for the whole group (IPI or= 2 for 20-year OS: 57.4% versus 27.6%, P = 0.012), as well as for patients treated with chemotherapy/radiotherapy (IPI or= 2 for CR: 76.7% versus 35.7%, P =.017; and 10-year OS: 63.8% versus 26.8%, P =.003).     

Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes in African Americans and whites with acute myeloid leukemia

Whites have a more favorable prognosis than African Americans for a number of cancers. The relationship between race and outcome is less clear in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Using data from 7 Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies initiated from 1985 to 1997, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2570 patients (270 African American and 2300 white) with de novo AML who received induction chemotherapy. African Americans were younger than whites (48 versus 54 years, P <.001). African Americans also had different cytogenetic risk group distributions than whites (P <.001): they were more commonly classified in the favorable (23% versus 14%) and unfavorable (31% versus 23%) groups, and less commonly classified in the intermediate group (47% versus 63%). African American men had a lower complete remission (CR) rate (54%, compared with 64% for white men, 65% for white women, and 70% for African American women, P =.001) and a worse overall survival compared with all other patients (P =.004), when known risk factors are taken into account. African Americans and whites with AML differ with respect to important prognostic factors. African American men have worse CR rates and overall survival than whites and African American women, and should be considered a poor-risk group.     

Early blast clearance by remission induction therapy is a major independent prognostic factor for both achievement of complete remission and long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) 1992 Trial

Risk assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using pretreatment characteristics may be improved by incorporating parameters of early response to therapy. In the 1992 trial of the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG), the amount of residual leukemic blasts in bone marrow was assessed one week after the first induction course (day 16 blasts). A total of 449 patients 16 to 76 years of age (median, 53 years) with de novo AML entered the trial and were evaluable. Treatment included TAD/HAM (thioguanine, cytosine arabinoside, and daunorubicin/high-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone) double induction, TAD consolidation, and randomly either maintenance therapy or S-HAM consolidation. Cytogenetics were favorable, intermediate, unfavorable and not available in 10.0%, 48.3%, 13.1%, and 28.5%, respectively. Day 16 blasts ranged from 0% to 100% (median, 5%, mean +/- SD, 18.6 +/- 28.5%). Complete remission (CR) rate was 72.6%, 17.6% had persistent leukemia (PL), and 9.8% succumbed to hypoplastic death. Median overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 18, 9, and 15 months with 28.4%, 21.6%, and 30.1% at 5 years, respectively. As a continuous variable, day 16 blasts were related to CR rate (P < 0.0001), PL rate (P < 0.0001), OS (P < 0.0001), EFS (P < 0.0001), and RFS (P = 0.0049). Multivariate analyses identified the following parameters to be associated with the respective end points. CR rate: day 16 blasts (P <.0001), age (P =.0036), and LDH (P =.0072); OS: unfavorable cytogenetics (P <.0001), day 16 blasts (P <.0001), age (P <.0001), and LDH (P =.0040); EFS: unfavorable cytogenetics (P <.0001), LDH (P <.0001), day 16 blasts (P <.0001), and age (P =.0061); RFS: unfavorable cytogenetics (P <.0001), LDH (P <.0001), and day 16 blasts (P =.0359). The prognostic significance of day 16 blasts is independent of pretherapeutic parameters and predicts outcome even in patients achieving a CR.     

Intensive chemotherapy with idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide, and G-CSF priming in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome and high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

In an attempt to improve the complete remission (CR) rates and to prolong the remission duration especially in elderly patients >50 years of age, we have used a combination chemotherapy of idarubicin (10 mg/m² IV×3 days), cytarabine (AraC, 100 mg/m² CIVI×7d), and etoposide (100 mg/m²×5 days) in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming [5 mg/kg SQ day 1 until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery] for remission induction. Responding patients received two consolidation courses of idarubicin, AraC, and etoposide, followed by a late consolidation course of intermediate-dose AraC (600 mg/m² IV every 12 h×5 days) and amsacrine (60 mg/m² IV×5 days). A total of 112 patients (57 male/55 female) with a median age of 58 years (range: 22–75) have been entered and are evaluable for response: 19 refractory anemia with excess of blast cells in transformation (RAEB-T), 84 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and 9 secondary AML after chemotherapy/radiotherapy. The overall CR rate was 62%, partial remission (PR) rate 10%, treatment failure 16%, and early death rate 12%. The CR rate was higher in patients 60 years (68 vs 55%), mainly due to a lower early death rate (5 vs 21%, p<0.001). After a median follow-up of 58 months, the median overall survival is 14.5% and median duration of relapse-free survival 8 months. After 60 months, the probability of CR patients to still be in CR and alive is 16% (20% in patients 60 years and 13% in patients >60 years), while the probability of overall survival is 12% (15% in patients 60 years and 9% in patients >60 years). Compared to our previous trial (AML-MDS Study 01-92) which was done with identical chemotherapy but no G-CSF priming in 110 patients with RAEB-T, AML after MDS, or secondary AML (identical median age, age range, and distribution of subtypes), the CR rate in all patients, as well as CR rate, overall survival, and relapse-free survival in patients >60 years have significantly been improved. Thus, intensive chemotherapy with G-CSF priming is both well tolerated and highly effective for remission induction in these high-risk patients.     

Remission status defined by immunofixation vs. electrophoresis after autologous transplantation has a major impact on the outcome of multiple myeloma patients

We have retrospectively analysed 344 multiple myeloma (MM) patients (202 de novo patients) treated in a non-uniform way in whom high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) response was simultaneously measured by both electrophoresis (EP) and immunofixation (IF). Patients in complete remission (CR) by EP were further subclassified as CR1 when IF was negative and CR2 when it remained positive. Partial responders (PR) were also subclassified as PR1 (very good PR, > 90% reduction in M-component) or PR2 (50-90% reduction). CR1 patients showed a significantly better event-free survival (EFS) [35% at 5 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 17-53, median 46 months] and overall survival (OS) (72% at 5 years, CI 57-86, median not reached) compared with any other response group (univariate comparison P < 0.00000 to P = 0. 004). In contrast, comparison of CR2 with PR1 and with PR2 did not define different prognostic subgroups (median EFS 30, 30 and 26 months respectively, P = 0.6; median survival 56, 44 and 42 months respectively, P = 0.5). The non-responding patients had the worst outcome (5-year OS 8%, median 7 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed both the absence of differences among CR2, PR1 and PR2 and the highly discriminatory prognostic capacity of a three-category classification: (i) CR1 (ii) CR2 + PR1 + PR2, and (iii) non-response (EFS P < 0.00000; OS P < 0.00000; both Cox models P < 0.00000). In the logistic regression analysis, the factors significantly associated with failure to achieve CR1 were the use of two or more up-front chemotherapy lines, status of non-response pre-ASCT and inclusion of total body irradiation (TBI) in the preparative regimen. Tandem transplants or the use of multiple agents (busulphan and melphalan) in the preparative regimen resulted in a higher CR1 level; none of the biological factors explored influenced the possibility of achieving CR1. These results confirm that, in MM patients undergoing ASCT, achieving a negative IF identifies the patient subset with the best prognosis; accordingly, therapeutic strategies should be specifically designed to achieve negative IF.     

Phase II study of a high-dose ifosfamide-based chemotherapy regimen with growth factor rescue in recurrent aggressive NHL. High response rates and limited toxicity, but limited impact on long-term survival

The purpose of the study was to evaluate in patients with recurrent intermediate-grade NHL, the tolerance to and efficacy of an intensive salvage regimen consisting of high doses of ifosfamide, etoposide and mitoxantrone with G-CSF support, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with recurrent aggressive lymphoma. Patients with recurrent intermediate-grade NHL under the age of 60 years were eligible. Induction consisted of ifosfamide 10 g/m(2) and etoposide 900 mg/m(2) with G-CSF 5 microg/kg twice a day. Upon recovery, patients underwent stem cell apheresis. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) underwent autologous stem cell transplantation using BEAM conditioning. Those with partial remission (PR) received treatment with ifosfamide 10 g/m(2), mitoxantrone 20 mg/m(2) and G-CSF 5 microg/kg. Those with CR received BEAM, those with PR received cyclophosphamide 4.5 g/m(2), etoposide 1200 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 135 mg/m(2) with stem cell rescue followed by BEAM. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given with all treatment cycles. The results were compared with those obtained in a prior study that used MINE-ESHAP salvage. Forty-four patients with recurrent intermediate-grade NHL were enrolled between March 1994 and September 1996. Median age was 50 years (24-61). Eleven patients had transformed lymphoma and seven had a T cell phenotype. Response rate to the high-dose ifosfamide regimen was 77% +/- 12% after two cycles and the complete response rate was 41% +/- 14%. Myelosuppression was profound but short. Median nadir ANC was 0 and the median duration of ANC <0.5 x 10(9)/l was 6 days (range 3-12). No severe infections occurred; 55% of the patients required blood transfusion and 42% required platelet transfusions. Myelosuppression and transfusion requirements were similar after the first and second cycles. Thirty-five of the 44 patients proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation and one transplant-related death occurred. With a median follow-up of 52 months, progression-free survival at 2 years is 38% +/- 14% and survival is 52% +/- 15%. Data from these 44 patients were pooled with data on 53 patients who had received salvage treatment with MINE-ESHAP, for a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, serum LDH was strongly associated with survival. The use of a more intensive salvage regimen, did not result in a significant increase in long-term outcome, despite a high response rate. In conclusion, duration of treatment, response rates, treatment-related mortality and survival compare favorably with previous salvage regimens, but recurrence remains a major problem. Long-term survival in recurrent large cell lymphoma is influenced more by disease characteristics than by the type of salvage regimen used.