Experience with single-agent paclitaxel consolidation following primary chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Twelve cycles of single-agent paclitaxel have been demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer whom achieved a clinical complete response to a primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This trial was conducted to compare the toxicity and disease-free interval of 3 cycles vs. 12 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation in patients treated with an intensive three-drug front-line regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, 26 ovarian cancer patients received primary chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h, day 1), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2), day 1 day 8), with treatment repeated every 21 days x 6 cycles. The first 13 patients (group A) received three additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days). The second set of 13 patients (group B) also received three cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) and then received nine additional cycles of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2) over 1 h every 21 days) consolidation therapy. The change from 3 cycles to 12 cycles of consolidation therapy for group B was made following the published results of GOG 178. RESULTS: In group A, all 13 patients completed three courses of consolidation therapy. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and two patients exhibited both grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 3 patients (23%). In group B, 9 of the 13 patients whom were intended to receive 12 total cycles of paclitaxel consolidation were able to complete the program. There was no grade 3-4 neutropenia or anemia in this population, although 1 patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade > or = 2 neuropathy developed in 7 patients (54%). Although not a randomized experience, median progression-free interval was 76 weeks for group B, and 47 weeks for group A. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel consolidation therapy can be administered for 12 cycles following first-line carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine induction therapy, but there is considerable risk for development of a moderately severe peripheral neuropathy.     

Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE: In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16). RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION: When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.     

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage IC-IV (AGO-OVAR protocol OVAR-8)

PURPOSE: A multicenter, nonrandomized, phase II study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability, toxicity, and activity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine combination in previously untreated ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients who had radical debulking surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IC-IV received sequentially paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: From October 2001 to July 2002, 55 patients were treated and evaluated. Main toxicities were hematological with NCI-CTC grade 3/4 anemia 12.7%, leukopenia 70.9%, neutropenia 76.3%, and thrombocytopenia 45.5. However, febrile neutropenia occurred only in 1.8%. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities were rare and occurred in less than 10% of patients. Toxicity-induced treatment delays occurred in 3.1% of cycles and resulted in early treatment cessation in four patients. Dose intensity reached 90.8% for carboplatin and paclitaxel, and 73.3% for gemcitabine. Objective response was observed in 10 of 14 patients with measurable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The triplet combination of paclitaxel-carboplatin-gemcitabine is feasible and active, with manageable hematological toxicity and no unexpected nonhematological toxicity. This regimen has proceeded to phase III evaluation.     

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel,carboplatin, and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with high-risk epithelial tumors of müllerian origin

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of combining docetaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine (DoCaGem) as first-line treatment of ovarian and other müllerian origin tumors. METHODS: Four dose levels were planned for this phase I trial. Treatment consisted of carboplatin on day 1 only, docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled, of whom 18 were evaluable for toxicity. The first 5 patients enrolled at dose level I (carboplatin AUC 5, 30 mg/m(2) docetaxel, 800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine) experienced no dose-limiting toxicity. At dose level II, 4/4 evaluable patients experienced significant bone marrow suppression that required dose reduction and/or dose delay. Further dose escalation was not attempted, and 9 additional patients were enrolled in dose level I. Of the 67 cycles administered on dose level I, day 8 treatment could not be administered due to bone marrow suppression in 16 cycles (24%), and prolongation of the cycle length from day 22 to day 29 was required in 13 cycles (19%). There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia in evaluable patients and no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (fatigue) occurred in 1 cycle. Response was determined in the 14 evaluable patients who tolerated 4 or more cycles of therapy, with 11 obtaining a complete clinical response and 3 obtaining a partial clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: The DoCaGem regimen is highly active, but myelosuppression at dose level I prevents full dose delivery. Other strategies to combine these three active agents are reasonable to explore.     

Pilot study of outpatient paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine for advanced stage epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, response rate, and toxicity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine as an outpatient regimen in the treatment of ovarian/non-ovarian and tubal adenocarcinoma. This is the largest completed study using this regimen as first-line treatment of these patients. METHODS: Following cytoreductive surgery, eligible patients were initially treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) via 1 h infusion), carboplatin (AUC = 5), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) as an outpatient every 21 days. Gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2)) was repeated on day 8. After six cycles of treatment, responders were eligible for an additional three cycles of paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Colony-stimulating factors were used at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (median age = 58; range 41-81) with stage III/IV epithelial carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum received a total of 476 cycles of chemotherapy. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia developed in 19.7% and 9% of cycles while grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia developed in 4.2% and 1.3% of the cycles. One hundred thirty-seven (28.8%) cycles of a possible 476 cycles of gemcitabine were delayed primarily due to grades 3 and 4 neutropenia. Forty-five (84.9%) patients exhibited a complete response and three (5.7%) patients demonstrated a partial response, for a total response rate of 90.4%. Twenty-two patients developed some degree of neuropathy, although there was no reported interference with activities of daily living. The patients' median progression-free interval and median overall survival was 15.5 and 40.8 months, respectively. Forty-one of the original 57 patients were alive at the conclusion of data collection. CONCLUSIONS: This report represents the largest completed study in the world employing this triplet regimen in the first-line treatment of advanced stage epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer patients. Although the study exhibited a high response rate, the neuropathy encountered in the study, and the need to eliminate gemcitabine in 54% of the patients due to bone marrow suppression merits further investigation of the dosing schedule. More recent gemcitabine data suggest that lower doses and a 2-week regimen may be as effective with less toxicity. A comparison of our results with the GOG-0182 study, that utilizes the same regimen, should be informative.     

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4-6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50-80 mg/m(2) cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin as first line therapy for patients with suboptimally debulked, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. A phase II trial of sequential doublets. The GO-First Study

OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin are active in epithelial ovarian cancer with minimal overlapping toxicity. We studied the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in patients with advanced ovarian cancer when given prior to carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Chemonaive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable disease were eligible for the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days (GO) for 4 cycles. This was followed by carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days (CP) for 4 cycles. RESULTS: Twenty patients, median age 62 years (range 39-78), FIGO stages III (16) and IV (4) received treatment. The response rate (RR) after 4 cycles of GO was 80% (95%CI 61-99%) (4 complete responses (CR), 12 partial responses (PR)). Interval debulking surgery was performed in 7 patients (35%). After CP chemotherapy, RR increased to 85% (95%CI 68-100%) (CR = 13, PR = 4). Median time to progression was 14.5 months. Estimated median overall survival was 31.5 months. Toxicities of GO were mild; grade 3/4 nausea in 3 patients (15%) and vomiting in 2 patients (10%), grade 3/4 neutropenia in 5 patients (25%). Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 5 patients (25%). After sequential administration of CP, grade 2/3 neuropathy occurred in 13 patients (72%). CONCLUSION: The sequential doublet regimen of GO followed by CP resulted in unacceptable neurotoxicity and is not recommended for further study; however, the doublet gemcitabine and oxaliplatin has significant activity in the first line treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.     

Sequence dependence of hematologic toxicity using carboplatin and topotecan for primary therapy of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Selection of a feasible sequence and schedule of carboplatin in combination with topotecan for evaluation in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stages III-IV EOC or primary peritoneal carcinoma without prior chemotherapy were assigned to consecutive cohorts evaluating a "forward" (carboplatin day 1, topotecan days 1-3), "reverse" (carboplatin day 3, topotecan days 1-3), or "extended reverse" sequence (carboplatin day 5, topotecan days 1-5). Patients received 4 cycles carboplatin-topotecan followed by 4 cycles carboplatin-paclitaxel. Feasibility was defined according to the cumulative proportion of patients with dose-limiting events (DLEs) during the first four cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled across 5 cohorts. The forward sequence demonstrated unacceptable hematologic DLEs at the lowest topotecan dose (0.75 mg/m2/day x 3 days). The reverse sequence was feasible at 1.25 mg/m2/day x 3 days, with only 1/15 patients experiencing a DLE within 4 cycles, and 14/15 patients were able to receive 4 subsequent cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel. The extended reverse sequence was associated with excessive DLEs at 1.00 mg/m2/day x 5 days. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not required. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of topotecan could be safely administered with reduced toxicity over multiple cycles using the reverse sequence, which was selected for phase III evaluation. The relative efficacy of the forward and reverse sequence is unknown.     

Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer: pathologic complete response and longitudinal assessment of impact on cognitive functioning

BACKGROUND: To determine the pathologic complete response rate of advanced ovarian cancer to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin with filgrastim, and assess the longitudinal impact of this regimen on quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer were treated in the phase I portion of the study. Initial doses were paclitaxel: 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, and 15; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: area under the curve (AUC) 5 day 1, every 21 days for 6 cycles with filgrastim. Twenty-seven patients were treated at the phase II dose. Pathologic response was assessed by second-look laparoscopy in patients with complete response. Patients completed longitudinal assessments of quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Maximally tolerated doses were paclitaxel: 80 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: AUC 5 day 1, every 21 days. Forty-eight percent of patients (13/27) experienced at least 1 grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Fifty percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-69%) of assessable patients achieved pathologic complete response. Median progression-free survival was 27.3 months (95% CI, 17.7 months to not reached), and overall survival 43.6 months (95% CI, 42 months to not reached). Cognitive functioning did not decline during or after chemotherapy. More highly educated women reported a perceived decline in concentration and memory while on chemotherapy. Quality-of-life scores were maintained during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer achieved pathologic complete response to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin. Cognitive functioning did not decline by objective measures, although highly educated women reported subjective impairment.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel, topotecan, cisplatin and Filgrastim in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian epithelial malignancies: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: To determine a recommended dose level (RDL) of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan in women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer as a possible experimental arm in a future Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III study. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III or IV disease were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, followed 2 h later by cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1. Topotecan was administered on consecutive days as a 30-minute infusion, beginning after cisplatin on day 1, receiving either 5 days beginning at 0.3 mg/m2 (cohort 1), or 3 days beginning at 0.5 mg/m2 (cohort 2). Treatment was given every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. RESULTS: Forty-five evaluable patients were enrolled in the two cohorts. Thrombocytopenia and prolonged neutropenia were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Dose-limiting neutropenia was seen at the first dose level, thus all subsequent dose escalations included Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 1 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2 daily x 5 with Filgrastim. The RDL of cohort 2 was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/3 h, cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily x 3 with Filgrastim. CONCLUSION: In women with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan is feasible. However, this treatment requires the use of Filgrastim and attenuated dosing of topotecan in both a 5-day and 3-day topotecan infusion schedule.     

Phase II study of sequential doublets: topotecan and carboplatin, followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin, in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Incorporating topotecan into standard platinum/taxane chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer has been complicated by myelosuppression. This study evaluated sequential doublets of topotecan and carboplatin, followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin, in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Forty-five patients (median age, 56 years; range, 38-77 years) with stage III/IV disease and GOG performance status <2 were enrolled and received four cycles of topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 to 3) and carboplatin (AUC 4 on day 1), followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) via 3-h IV infusion on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1). All cycles were 21 days. Antitumor response was assessed after four and eight cycles; patients with clinical complete response (CR) underwent second-look laparotomy for determination of pathologic CR (PCR). Dose reductions were instituted for grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and for grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Among 41 CA-125 evaluable patients, complete and partial responses were observed in 29 (70.7%) and 11 (26.8%) patients, respectively. Of the 12 clinical CRs (43%) in 28 evaluable patients, 10 patients underwent second-look laparotomy, with 3 PCRs (30%). Median time to progression was 14 months and actuarial survival was 23 months. Neutropenia was the primary toxicity and cause of dose adjustments and delays, including two deaths. CONCLUSION: The antitumor activity observed is comparable with other series, although neutropenic complications were increased. Progression-free and actuarial survivals were slightly inferior. A Phase III trial (GOG 182) of sequential doublets in the reverse sequence is ongoing.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Based on the activity and tolerability of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, we conducted a phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in chemotherapy naive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Three schedules were studied: paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days; paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days with liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days; and weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin (AUC=5) every 21 days and liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days. The paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on an every 3-4 week schedule and 60 mg/m(2) when administered weekly. Based on the frequency of neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and > or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, the starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin of 20 mg/m(2) was escalated to determine the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 210 (21-day) cycles were administered to 37 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred when liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 40 mg/m(2). Because of treatment-related delays resulting in decreased paclitaxel/carboplatin dose intensity, administration was modified to be given every 21 days, with liposomal doxorubicin given every 42 days. Since neutropenia was the DLT of this schedule, the schema was further modified to administer paclitaxel weekly; however, weekly administration was inconsistent because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin (AUC=5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) are tolerable without supportive therapy. The usual dose intensity of paclitaxel/carboplatin was maintained by administering liposomal doxorubicin every other cycle.     

Docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gynecological tumors. A phase I/II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO-OVAR) Ovarian Cancer Study Group

OBJECTIVES: We performed a phase I-II study in patients with ovarian and other gynecological cancers to determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of docetaxel/carboplatin. METHODS: Thirty patients were treated in three cohorts with carboplatin (AUC 5) and escalating docetaxel (60, 75 and 90 mg/m2), administered intravenously on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Premedication consisted of 16 mg dexamethasone per os on day -1, and +1 and 4 mg intravenously before docetaxel. RESULTS: A total of 6, 11 and 12 patients were eligible and treated on dose levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At docetaxel 90 mg/m2, febrile and prolonged neutropenia were dose-limiting, and 75 mg/m2 with carboplatin AUC 5 was considered the MTD. Prolonged neutropenia occurred in two, four and nine patients of dose levels 1-3, respectively, and febrile neutropenia in 2, 1, and 2 patients of dose level 1-3. Thrombocytopenia grade 4 was observed in one patient of dose level 1. Non-hematological toxicity including neuropathy was usually mild across all dose levels. Overall response rate was 73%. Median time to progression was 18.0 months, and median overall survival will exceed 24.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel/carboplatin can be safely administered to patients with gynecological cancer despite substantial myelotoxicity and appears to be active in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Low neurotoxicity offers an option for comparison with paclitaxel-containing regimens.     

Phase I trial of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and carboplatin (TAC) for the treatment of endometrial cancer

Doxorubicin, platinum compounds, and taxanes represent the chemotherapeutic agents with the greatest activity in endometrial cancer. We conducted an optimal-dose determination of combination chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel (TXL), doxorubicin, and carboplatin (CBDCA) (TAC) in patients with endometrial cancer. Patients with epithelial endometrial cancer requiring adjuvant therapy were enrolled between June 2003 and March 2005. No patients had received prior radiotherapy, and only two patients had previously undergone chemotherapy. Doxorubicin was infused on day 1, and TXL followed by CBDCA was administered on day 2. The starting dose was doxorubicin 35 mg/m(2), TXL 120 mg/m(2), and CBDCA area under the curve (AUC). The dose of each agent was gradually escalated. Patients were scheduled to receive at least four cycles of therapy. If patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever with grade 3 neutropenia, they were permitted to be administered granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after the second course. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. Although four patients out of 27 experienced dose-limiting toxicities, a maximum tolerated dose was not established at the final dose level. Five patients (three for recurrent and two for advanced) had measurable lesions. There were four responders (three for partial response and one for complete response) in our series. The recommended dose of TAC therapy for endometrial cancer was doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) for day 1, TXL 150 mg/m(2) and CBDCA AUC 5 for day 2.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

This study aimed to determine the first-cycle maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and then assess the feasibility of this dose over multiple cycles.

Methods

Beginning at an intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin dose area under the curve (AUC) of 5 and a fixed intravenous dose of 175 mg/m² paclitaxel, patients were entered on a dose-escalating phase evaluating first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After estimating the MTD, cohorts of 20 patients were then entered in an expanded phase to evaluate DLT over four cycles.

Results

Twenty-one patients were entered on the dose-escalating phase. A first-cycle MTD of carboplatin at AUC 8 was tolerated although thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting over multiple cycles. An additional 69 patients were treated in expanded cohorts. Only 5/90 (5.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of a port problem. Four-cycle DLT required de-escalation to a carboplatin AUC of 6, and even at that dose, there were 14 dose-limiting toxic effects in 40 patients (35%). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were due to neutropenia, and 6 were due to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Six cycles of therapy were completed in 75% of eligible patients, but dose adjustments were required.

Conclusions

The first-cycle MTD did not predict the tolerability of this regimen over multiple cycles. Using an IP carboplatin dose of AUC 6 in combination with paclitaxel, the regimen can be administered with a high completion rate over multiple cycles. Because neutropenia is a frequent DLT, the addition of hematopoietic growth factors may permit a high completion rate while maintaining this dose.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the feasibility of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin, and IP paclitaxel in women with newly diagnosed Stages II-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IP on day 1 and paclitaxel IP 60 mg/m² on day 8. A standard 3 + 3 design was used in the escalation phase. A two-stage group sequential design with 20 patients at the MTD was used in the feasibility phase. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was assessed pre and post treatment.

Results

Patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m² IV and carboplatin IP from AUC 5-7 on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8. The MTD was estimated at carboplatin AUC 6 IP and 25 patients enrolled at this dose level. Within the first 4 cycles, seven (35%) of twenty evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 3 neutropenic fever (3), > 2 week delay due to ANC recovery (1), grade 3 LFT (1), and grade 3 infection (1). De-escalation to paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV was given to improve the safety. After six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles without a DLT, bevacizumab was added and six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles with one DLT (grade 3 hyponatremia).

Conclusions

Paclitaxel at 175 mg/m² IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP day 8 yield 18-56% patients with DLTs. The tolerability of the regimen in combination with bevacizumab was indicated in a small cohort.     

Paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine in advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial adenocarcinoma: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the response rate and progression free and overall survival of patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with paclitaxel, carboplatin and amifostine. To evaluate the toxicity of amifostine when used in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Forty-seven eligible patients (median age: 66; range 45-82) with bidimensionally measurable advanced, recurrent, or refractory endometrial cancer were treated with carboplatin (AUC = 6), paclitaxel (175 mg/M2) and amifostine (740 mg/M2) every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were 4 CRs (8%) (2 confirmed, 2 unconfirmed) and 15 PRs (32%) (9 confirmed, 6 unconfirmed) for a total response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 56%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI, 6-9 months) and a 6-month PFS rate of 64% (95% CI, 50% to 78%). The median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI, 12 to 17 months). Toxicity was tolerable. While 79% of patients developed Grade 3/4 neutropenia (30% Grade 3, 49% Grade 4), there were no episodes of Grade 4 febrile neutropenia and one episode of infection with grades 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin with amifostine was well reasonably tolerated in this cohort. The regimen demonstrated significant activity in endometrial cancer, comparable to other multi-agent chemotherapy programs in terms of response rate and survival, and with a favorable toxicity profile.     

Phase II study of carboplatin followed by sequential gemcitabine and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer

The aim of this exploratory phase II study was to evaluate sequential chemotherapy with carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination in chemonaive patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to evaluate time to progressive disease (TTPD); secondary objectives included the evaluation of 1- and 3-year survival, response rates, and toxicity. Following initial debulking surgery or biopsy, patients with FIGO stage IIC-IV disease received four cycles of carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (day 1) every 21 days, followed by four cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 8) every 21 days. A total of 47 patients enrolled, 44 (93.6%) completed the initial four cycles, and 39 patients (82.9%) completed the planned eight cycles. The median and maximum lengths of follow-up were 31.2 and 43.7 months, respectively. Median TTPD was 13.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-21.0 months), and median survival time was 31.2 months (95% CI, 25.2-39.6 months). Survival at 1 and 3 years was 95.7% and 44.2%, respectively. Of the 43 evaluable patients, most (95.3%) of them achieved a CA-125 marker response based on Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) definition. The partial response rate in the seven patients with measurable disease was 46.4%. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia observed in 76.6% patients and thrombocytopenia in 12.8% patients. The sequential approach of carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian cancer is feasible and well tolerated, and depending upon the findings from other major trials, it may merit further evaluation.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus carboplatin in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine and carboplatin each have demonstrated effectiveness without increased neurotoxicity in pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in a multicenter phase II study. METHODS: Women with histologically proven measurable or evaluable epithelial ovarian cancer (any FIGO) who relapsed > or =6 months after discontinuation of first-line, platinum-containing therapy received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 (after gemcitabine) every 21 days for up to six cycles. RESULTS: Of the 40 enrolled/evaluable patients, 6 (15%) had complete response and 19 (47.5%) had partial response (PR), including one patient with PR in nonmeasurable disease (PRNM), for an overall response rate of 62.5% (95% CI, 45.8-77.3%). The median duration of response was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-10.0), the median time to progressive disease was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.5-11.0), and the median time to treatment failure was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.2-10.4). The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (78% of patients), leukopenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (18%), and anemia (15%); no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities occurred, and grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is active and feasible in platinum-sensitive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. This regimen is undergoing further evaluation in a large phase III trial.