Molecular techniques in mycobacterial detection

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility of the commercial nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests (ie, Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test, Gen-Probe, Inc and AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis Test, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. DATA SOURCES: Review of the English-language literature. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both NAA tests is excellent (sensitivity, > or = 95%; specificity, 100%) when testing respiratory specimens that are smear-positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB). Only the Gen-Probe assay is approved for testing respiratory specimens regardless of the AFB smear result. Data from 3 studies showed that the sensitivity of the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test in smear-negative patients ranged from 83% to 85%, and that the specificity was 99%. Both NAA tests have been used to test nonrespiratory specimens; in some studies, the performance was comparable to the performance obtained for respiratory specimens, whereas in others, it was lower. The NAA tests also appear to be reliable tools for rapid detection of M tuberculosis complex in positive broth cultures of all specimen types (except blood). The impact of the NAA tests on patient outcome varies based on the result of the AFB smear. In smear-positive patients, public health and hospital infection-control resources are predominantly affected. The potential for influencing patient outcome is much greater when the AFB smear is negative. In smear-negative patients, the NAA test could provide more rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and subsequent initiation of therapy; eliminate the need for invasive diagnostic procedures, which are both costly and pose an added risk to the patient; and allow earlier discharge of hospitalized patients. Prospective studies concerning the cost-effectiveness of the NAA tests are needed.     

Clinical evaluation of the enhanced Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in prison inmates

The reliability of the enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (E-MTD; Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) for rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) was evaluated by testing 1, 004 respiratory specimens from 489 Texas prison inmates. Results were compared to those of mycobacterial culture (BACTEC TB 460 and Middlebrook 7H11 biplates), smear for acid-fast bacilli (AFB; auramine O), and clinical course. After chart review, three patients (nine specimens) who were on antituberculosis therapy before the study began were excluded from final analysis. Of the remaining 995 specimens, 21 were AFB smear positive: 13 grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), 6 grew nontuberculous mycobacteria, and 2 (from two patients diagnosed with TB and started on therapy after the study began) were culture negative. Twenty-eight specimens (20 patients) were positive for MTBC by culture and E-MTD. Seven specimens (seven patients) were positive by culture alone; three were from patients who had other E-MTD-positive specimens, two were false-positive cultures, and two were false-negative E-MTD results. Eight specimens were positive by E-MTD only; four specimens (four patients) were false-positive E-MTD results, and four specimens were from two patients with earlier E-MTD-positive specimens that grew MTBC. Thus, there were 22 patients with TB (10 smear positive and 12 smear negative). The sensitivity and specificity of the AFB smear for diagnosis of TB, by patient, were 45.5 and 98.9%, respectively. After resolving discrepancies, these same values for E-MTD were 90.9 and 99.1% overall, 100 and 100% for the smear-positive patients, and 83.3 and 99.1% for the smear-negative patients. Excluding the one smear-negative patient whose E-MTD-negative, MTBC culture-positive specimen contained inhibitory substances, the sensitivity of E-MTD was 95.2% overall and 90.9% in smear-negative patients. The specificity and positive predictive value of E-MTD can be improved, without altering other performance characteristics, by modifying the equivocal zone recommended by the manufacturer. These data suggest that E-MTD is a reliable method for rapid diagnosis of pulmonary TB, irrespective of the AFB smear result. Guidelines for the most appropriate use of E-MTD with smear-negative patients are needed.     

Clinical evaluation of the Roche AMPLICOR PCR Mycobacterium tuberculosis test for detection of M. tuberculosis in respiratory specimens.

The reliability of the Roche AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis test (AMPLICOR MTB) for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis was evaluated by testing 956 respiratory specimens from 502 patients and comparing results with results by culture and medical history. Of those 135 specimens that were culture positive for mycobacteria, 61 specimens from 31 patients grew M. tuberculosis. Fifty-two specimens were smear positive for acid-fast bacteria (AFB); M. tuberculosis was isolated from 41 of these specimens. On initial testing, the sensitivity and specificity of the AMPLICOR MTB assay, compared with culture, were 78.7 and 99.3%, respectively. After resolution of discrepancies (by review of medical history), the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the AMPLICOR MTB assay were 79.4, 99.6, 92.6, and 98.6%, respectively. Two specimens from two patients with no clinical evidence of tuberculosis were AMPLICOR MTB positive and culture positive for Mycobacterium avium complex. For AFB smear-positive specimens, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of AMPLICOR MTB were 97.6, 100, 100, and 90.9%, respectively. For AFB smear-negative specimens, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of AMPLICOR MTB were 40.0, 99.5, 69.2, and 98.7%, respectively. Our results support the use of AMPLICOR MTB for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in patients whose respiratory specimens are AFB smear positive. Further studies are needed to determine the most clinically relevant and cost-effective use of this assay with AFB smear-negative specimens.     

Amplification of rRNA for assessment of treatment response of pulmonary tuberculosis patients during antimicrobial therapy.

The time course of persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as measured by detection of rRNA, acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear, and culture was determined for pulmonary tuberculosis patients during antimicrobial therapy. Twenty-three patients who were initially AFB smear positive and who subsequently completed a course of antimicrobial therapy were selected for the study. Sequential specimens were tested by AFB smear, culture, and rRNA amplification (Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test [MTD]). The initial diagnostic specimens of all patients were positive by culture; those of 22 patients (96%) also were positive by MTD. Overall, MTD results remained positive longer than both smear and culture results. The median times to the last positive test result were 9 days for AFB smear, 26 days for culture, and 30 days for MTD. The last positive test result was the AFB smear result in 4% of cases, the culture result in 22%, and the MTD result in 52%. Fifty-six percent of patients had a period of shedding of noncultivable M. tuberculosis which was detected by MTD after culture results had converted to negative. This noncultivable period lasted 7 to 245 days. All three tests became reproducibly negative before the end of therapy and remained negative during follow-up for up to 1 year. These results indicate that during successful antimicrobial therapy, M. tuberculosis is eliminated in sputum samples as measured by amplification of rRNA, as well as by AFB smear and culture. No long-term rRNA carrier state was detected. While the time course of clearance of M. tuberculosis measured by rRNA overall was longer than with the two traditional tests, the rRNA test results allow sensitive and precise measurement of the clearance of noncultivable M. tuberculosis from respiratory specimens. This attribute may allow rRNA testing to be useful in clarifying patient response to antimicrobial therapy.     

Evaluation of Two Line Probe Assays for Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,Tuberculosis (TB) Drug Resistance,and Non-TB Mycobacteria in HIV-Infected Individuals with Suspected TB

Limited performance data from line probe assays (LPAs), nucleic acid tests used for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance are available for HIV-infected individuals, in whom paucibacillary TB is common. In this study, the strategy of testing sputum with GenoType MTBDRplus (MTBDR-Plus) and GenoType Direct LPA (Direct LPA) was compared to a gold standard of one mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) liquid culture. HIV-positive (HIV⁺) individuals with suspected TB from southern Africa and South America with <7 days of TB treatment had 1 sputum specimen tested with Direct LPA, MTBDR-Plus LPA, smear microscopy, MGIT, biochemical identification of mycobacterial species, and culture-based drug-susceptibility testing (DST). Of 639 participants, 59.3% were MGIT M. tuberculosis culture positive, of which 276 (72.8%) were acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear positive. MTBDR-Plus had a sensitivity of 81.0% and a specificity of 100%, with sensitivities of 44.1% in AFB smear-negative versus 94.6% in AFB smear-positive specimens. For specimens that were positive for M. tuberculosis by MTBDR-Plus, the sensitivity and specificity for rifampin resistance were 91.7% and 96.6%, respectively, and for isoniazid (INH) they were 70.6% and 99.1%. The Direct LPA had a sensitivity of 88.4% and a specificity of 94.6% for M. tuberculosis detection, with a sensitivity of 72.5% in smear-negative specimens. Ten of 639 MGIT cultures grew Mycobacterium avium complex or Mycobacterium kansasii, half of which were detected by Direct LPA. Both LPA assays performed well in specimens from HIV-infected individuals, including in AFB smear-negative specimens, with 72.5% sensitivity for M. tuberculosis identification with the Direct LPA and 44.1% sensitivity with MTBDR-Plus. LPAs have a continued role for use in settings where rapid identification of INH resistance and clinically relevant NTM are priorities.     

Nonclinical selection criteria for maximizing yield of nucleic acid amplification tests in tuberculosis diagnosis

In spite of the excellent performance of rapid tuberculosis (TB) nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests and the clear benefits of immediate diagnosis of TB disease, NAA tests frequently are not used in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB cases, particularly TB cases with smear-negative sputa. Public health laboratories primarily perform TB NAA tests only on a targeted subset of specimens, usually including those that are smear positive and those for which a clinician has specifically requested NAA testing. As an alternative to targeted testing, some laboratories use TB NAA tests universally for all respiratory specimens, though this practice can be prohibitively costly and can be associated with an increased frequency of false-positive results due to testing of lower-risk patients. We propose a strategy for identifying individuals for NAA testing on the basis of nonclinical risk criteria that are routinely provided on the test requisition form, such as type of health care facility from which the specimen is received and patient age group. Use of this strategy at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Laboratory would allow for NAA test identification of approximately 54 (74%) of 72 culture-positive pulmonary TB cases over a 1-year period while requiring NAA testing for only 933 (17%) of 5,469 individuals submitting respiratory specimens. We demonstrate that use of nonclinical NAA test selection criteria is an effective strategy for maximizing the number of TB cases that can be rapidly identified while minimizing the number of specimens that must be tested.     

Direct Detection of Mycobacterial Species in Pulmonary Specimens by Two Rapid Amplification Tests,the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test and the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct Test

Nucleic acid amplification tests have improved tuberculosis diagnostics considerably. This study evaluates a new amplification test, the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct (GTMD) test, for detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium malmoense directly in 61 sputum samples. Thirty (49.2%) samples were auramine smear positive, and 31 (50.8%) were smear negative. The GTMD results were compared to the Gen-Probe Amplified M. tuberculosis Direct (MTD) test results, using culturing and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene as reference methods. The GTMD test could identify 28 of 29 samples containing the M. tuberculosis complex and was negative in a sputum sample containing M. intracellulare. The overall sensitivity and specificity results were 93.3% and 90.0% for the GTMD test, respectively, and 93.1% and 93.5% for the MTD test, respectively. The GTMD test is rapid and can be easily included in routine clinical laboratories for the direct detection of the M. tuberculosis complex in smear-positive sputum samples as an adjunct to microscopy and culture. Further studies are needed to evaluate the performance of the GTMD test for the detection of atypical mycobacteria.Worldwide, tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of illness and death. WHO estimates that in 2006, 9.2 million new cases and 1.7 million deaths occurred from TB globally (25), and the incidence is increasing. The emergence of multidrug-resistant TB, and recently also extensively drug-resistant TB, and the human immunodeficiency virus-TB coinfection are further worsening the situation, and effort to accelerate progress in global TB control is needed. Important factors for TB control are increased case detection and treatment success rates (25). The slow growth of most pathogenic mycobacteria results in diagnosis and treatment delay and has stimulated the development of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests for identification of mycobacteria directly in clinical specimens. NAA tests provide test results within 1 day. In general, the specificity result for NAA tests ranges from 95% to 100% (1, 12, 16, 23), but the sensitivity result, especially for acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear-negative samples, varies greatly, from 33 to 96% (1, 12, 16, 23). For AFB smear-positive respiratory specimens, the sensitivity level is approximately 95%.Two direct systems approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for detection of pulmonary TB are commercially available, as follows: the Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Indianapolis, IN) and the Gen-Probe Amplified M. tuberculosis Direct test (MTD test; Gen-Probe, San Diego, CA). Both tests use the 16S rRNA gene as the target amplification gene. The 16S rRNA gene represents a stable property of microorganisms and is widely used as the target for identifying mycobacterium species. Several studies have confirmed an excellent test proficiency (sensitivity and specificity levels of more than 95%) in AFB smear-positive sputum samples but a reduced sensitivity level (82 to 85%) when applied on AFB smear-negative samples (1, 16, 23, 24). Thus, their use was limited to respiratory smear-positive samples from untreated patients. An enhanced version of the MTD test was later approved for use in both smear-positive and smear-negative specimens (5). A novel, commercially available NAA test for diagnosis of TB directly in patient specimens which has not yet been FDA approved is the BD ProbeTec ET test (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD). The test is based on strand-displacement amplification of target sequences in IS6110 and the 16S rRNA gene and has a sensitivity level of 90 to 100% and a specificity level of 92% in smear-positive sputum samples (16). To make the NAA tests more rapid, robust, and applicable in laboratories without substantial technical infrastructure, the following novel NAA tests have been developed: the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) test (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (2, 3), the GeneXpert system (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) (9), and the gold nanoparticle probes assay (21). Simple sample processing, amplification, and detection steps make these NAA tests more applicable in low-income countries with high incidence of TB. However, data on test proficiencies are limited so far. Ongoing studies will show if these rapid molecular tests can be alternatives to the conventional TB diagnostic tests.Recently, a new DNA strip test for detection of mycobacteria directly in smear-positive and smear-negative respiratory samples has been developed. The GenoType Mycobacteria Direct (GTMD) test (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) is based on nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and amplifies single-stranded nucleic acids from the 23S rRNA gene in an isothermal reaction. The biotinylated amplified DNA product is hybridized to specific oligonucleotide probes immobilized on the strip. The GTMD test detects members of the M. tuberculosis complex (MTC), Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium kansasii, and Mycobacterium malmoense directly from decontaminated respiratory specimens, and the result is available within 1 day. Few studies have previously evaluated the GTMD test (7, 15, 20).The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the GTMD test and compare that test to the MTD test. Thus, the GTMD and MTD tests were evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using 61 respiratory specimens from patients suspected to suffer from pulmonary TB. Amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene of strains isolated from specimen culture (solid and automated liquid media) were used as reference methods.     

Specimen dilution increases the diagnostic utility of the gen-probe mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test

The Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) Test is widely used for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in respiratory specimens. Based on high specificity, it is accepted that a positive MTD result, in proper clinical context, "rules in" a diagnosis of tuberculosis. Test utility for "ruling out" tuberculosis has been limited by lower sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV), based in part on poorly defined reaction inhibitors in clinical specimens. After discovering that specimen dilution could decrease concentrations of reaction inhibitors without reaching the MTBC detection limit, the Massachusetts State Laboratory Institute in 2003 began routinely testing paired undiluted and diluted samples in parallel. We retrospectively analyzed results from 105 respiratory specimens (87 smear-positive, 18 smear-negative) tested consecutively over 23 months using this dilution protocol. MTD results for each sample pair were merged into a sum result (positive or negative) and compared with culture outcome as the "gold standard." We found that the MTD sum result always matched the culture outcome, even for smear-negative specimens. Accordingly, the MTD using the dilution protocol had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV of 100% vs culture.     

Clinical Evaluation of the Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in select nonrespiratory specimens

The performance of the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD; Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis was evaluated by testing 178 nonrespiratory specimens from 158 patients. Criteria for specimen inclusion were (i) a positive smear for acid-fast bacilli (n = 54) and (ii) the source if the smear was negative (tissue biopsies and aspirates and abscess material were tested; n = 124). Results were compared to those of mycobacterial culture; clinical history was reviewed when MTD and culture results disagreed. Forty-eight specimens (27.0%) were positive for mycobacteria, including 23 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex specimens; of which 21 were smear positive. Twenty-five specimens were MTD positive; 20 of these grew M. tuberculosis complex. All of the five MTD-positive, M. tuberculosis complex culture-negative specimens were considered truly positive, based on review of the medical record. Of the three MTD-negative, M. tuberculosis complex culture-positive specimens, two contained inhibitory substances; one of the two was smear positive. Excluding the latter specimen from analysis, after chart review, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MTD were 92.6, 100, 100, and 98.7%, respectively, by specimen and 89.5, 100, 100, and 98.6% by patient. Given the few smear-negative samples from patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis in our study, additional similar studies that include more smear-negative, M. tuberculosis complex culture-positive specimens to confirm our data are desirable.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test as used routinely on smear-positive respiratory specimens

A decision analysis was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of programs in which the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct test (MTD) (Gen-Probe) is used to rapidly exclude Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex as a cause of disease in smear-positive respiratory specimens. MTD sensitivity, specificity, and probability of inhibition for smear-positive specimens were estimated from literature reports. Costs and laboratory performance characteristics were determined from review of records and practices at an urban hospital in the mid-Atlantic United States. In the base case, 31.4% of smear-positive specimens were assumed to be culture positive for M. tuberculosis. Under these conditions, the marginal cost of the MTD testing program was estimated as $338 per smear-positive patient, or $494 per early exclusion of tuberculosis based on negative MTD results. By comparison, the cost of respiratory isolation ($27.77/day) and drugs ($5.66/day) averted by MTD testing was estimated at $201 per early tuberculosis exclusion. MTD testing was therefore not cost-effective in this scenario. Sensitivity analysis revealed that cost-effectiveness estimates are sensitive to the number of smear-positive specimens processed annually, the relative prevalence of M. tuberculosis in smear-positive specimens, and the marginal daily cost of respiratory isolation. A decision tool is therefore presented for assessing the cost-effectiveness of MTD under various combinations of those three variables. While routine MTD testing of smear-positive specimens is not expected to be cost-saving for most individual hospitals, centralized reference laboratories may be able to implement MTD in a cost-effective manner across a wide range of situations.     

Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens

Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains one of the most significant causes of death from an infectious agent. The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin (RIF) resistance are essential for early disease management. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel integrated diagnostic device for the diagnosis of tuberculosis and rapid detection of RIF resistance in clinical specimens. We determined the performance of the MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance in smear-positive and smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens obtained from possible tuberculosis patients. Two hundred fifty-three pulmonary and 176 extrapulmonary specimens obtained from 429 patients were included in the study. One hundred ten (89 culture positive and 21 culture negative for M. tuberculosis) of the 429 patients were considered to have tuberculosis. In pulmonary specimens, sensitivities were 100% (27/27) and 68.6% (24/35) for smear-positive and smear-negative specimens, respectively. It had a lower sensitivity with extrapulmonary specimens: 100% for smear-positive specimens (4/4) and 47.7% for smear-negative specimens (21/44). The test accurately detected the absence of tuberculosis in all 319 patients without tuberculosis studied. The MTB/RIF assay also detected 1 RIF-resistant specimen and 88 RIF-susceptible specimens, and the results were confirmed by drug susceptibility testing. We concluded that the MTB/RIF test is a simple method, and routine staff with minimal training can use the system. The test appeared to be as sensitive as culture with smear-positive specimens but less sensitive with smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens that include low numbers of bacilli.     

Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct testing for cases of pulmonary tuberculosis

We conducted a decision analysis to assess and compare four algorithms for amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct (MTD) testing of respiratory specimens in terms of cost-effectiveness. The most cost-effective strategy was one in which smear-positive specimens but not smear-negative specimens were diluted prior to MTD testing.     

First evaluation of an improved assay for molecular genetic detection of tuberculosis as well as rifampin and isoniazid resistances

The commercially available line probe assay MTBDRplus 2.0 (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) was evaluated for its ability to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and mutations conferring resistance to rifampin (RMP) and isoniazid (INH) directly in smear-negative and smear-positive pulmonary clinical specimens under routine laboratory conditions. A total of 348 samples originating from Moldova, a high-incidence country for tuberculosis (TB), were investigated. Two hundred fifty-seven (73.9%) were smear negative, 12 samples were excluded, and 81 (23.3%) were smear positive. Two DNA extraction methods were applied. Compared to culture and clinical data as the reference standard (adapted from Vadwai V et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:2540-2545, 2011), overall sensitivity and specificity were 87.6 and 99.2%, respectively. One hundred four of the 257 smear-negative samples turned out to be culture positive, and 20 were MTBC culture negative but were positive based on clinical symptoms. The combined sensitivity and specificity in the subgroup of smear-negative samples were calculated to be 79.8 and 99.2%, respectively. MTBDRplus 2.0 detected RMP and INH resistance with sensitivity and specificity of 94.3 and 96.0%, respectively. In conclusion, the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay is a rapid and highly sensitive test for the detection of M. tuberculosis strains from smear-positive and -negative clinical specimens and provides additional information on RMP and INH resistance status, which can easily be included in routine laboratory work flow.     

Comparison of the MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB systems for recovery of mycobacteria from various clinical specimens

A total of 1,830 specimens (75.7% respiratory and 24.3% nonrespiratory) were cultured in parallel with the MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB systems and on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium. Mycobacteria were identified from 173 (6.5%) specimens. The most common species recovered were Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (65. 9%), Mycobacterium avium complex (22.5%), and Mycobacterium chelonae (9.2%). The recovery rates by individual systems were 96.5, 99.4, and 95.9% for MB/BacT, BACTEC 460 TB, and LJ medium, respectively, for all mycobacteria; the recovery rates were 99.1, 100, and 98.2%, respectively, for M. tuberculosis complex alone. The difference among the recovery rates for all mycobacteria and those for individual species was not significant. The BACTEC 460 TB system detected M. tuberculosis isolates more rapidly than the MB/BacT system (8 versus 11.8 days for smear-positive specimens [P < 0.01] and 18 versus 21 days for smear-negative specimens [P < 0.05]), whereas the MB/BacT system more rapidly detected the nontuberculous mycobacteria (17.1 versus 12.7 days [P < 0.01]). These results indicate that the nonradiometric MB/BacT system is a rapid, sensitive, and efficient method for the recovery of M. tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria from both pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical specimens.     

Utility of PCR in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis.

At present, the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis rests with microscopy. However, this technique is insensitive and many cases of pulmonary tuberculosis cannot be initially confirmed. Nucleic acid amplification techniques are extremely sensitive, but when they are applied to tuberculosis diagnosis, they have given variable results. Investigators at six centers in Europe compared a standardized PCR system (Amplicor; Roche) against conventional culture methods. Defined clinical information was collected. Discrepant samples were retested, and inhibition assays and backup amplification with a separate primer pair were performed. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms were recovered from 654 (9.1%) of 7,194 samples and 293 (7.8%) of 3,738 patients. Four hundred fifty-two of the M. tuberculosis isolates from 204 patients were smear positive and culture positive. Among the culture-positive specimens, PCR had a sensitivity of 91.4% for smear-positive specimens and 60.9% for smear-negative specimens, with a specificity of 96.1%. Analysis of 254 PCR-positive, culture-negative specimens with discrepant results revealed that 130 were from patients with recently diagnosed tuberculosis and 94 represented a presumed laboratory error. Similar analysis of 118 PCR-negative, culture-positive specimens demonstrated that 27 discrepancies were due to presumed uneven aliquot distribution and 11 were due to presumed laboratory error; PCR inhibitors were detected in 8 specimens. Amplicor enables laboratories with little previous experience with nucleic acid amplification to perform PCR. Disease in more than 60% of the patients with tuberculosis with smear-negative, culture-positive specimens can be diagnosed at the time of admission, and potentially all patients with smear-positive specimens can immediately be confirmed as being infected with M. tuberculosis, leading to improved clinical management.     

Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system.

A total of 938 respiratory specimens (633 sputa, 249 bronchial and tracheal aspirates, and 56 bronchoalveolar lavages) from 589 patients were tested for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by the Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test (MTD), and the results were compared with those of the conventional methods of fluorescence microscopy and cultivation (solid and radiometric media). One series of specimens (n = 515) was decontaminated with N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NALC)-NaOH: the other one (n = 423) was decontaminated with sodium dodecyl (lauryl) sulfate (SDS)-NaOH. Of the specimens decontaminated with NALC, 39 were MTD and culture positive, 455 were MTD and culture negative, 18 were MTD positive and culture negative, and 3 were MTD negative and culture positive, indicating a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 96.2% for the MTD. Of the specimens decontaminated with SDS, 35 were MTD and culture positive, 372 were MTD and culture negative, 15 were MTD positive and culture negative, and 1 was MTD negative and culture positive, indicating a sensitivity of 97.2% and a specificity of 96.1% for the MTD. After resolution of discrepant results by review of the patients' clinical data, the sensitivity of the MTD was 93.9%, the specificity was 97.6%, the positive predictive value was 80.7%, and the negative predictive value was 99.3% for the NALC series; the corresponding values were 97.4, 96.9, 76.0, and 99.7%, respectively, for the SDS series. In conclusion, the MTD is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting M. tuberculosis complex within hours in both smear-positive and smear-negative respiratory specimens.     

Value of examining three acid-fast bacillus sputum smears for removal of patients suspected of having tuberculosis from the "airborne precautions" category

We examined the potential risk of tuberculosis transmission if we modified our policy for release of patients from the "airborne precautions" category from three negative acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smears to two, or even one. Over a 4-year period, respiratory cultures from 42 patients grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Of these, 36 patients (81%) had a positive AFB smear result on the first submitted specimen. One additional patient (2%) had a first smear-positive finding on the second submitted specimen, and no patients had a first smear-positive result on the third submitted specimen. Respiratory cultures from five patients (12%) grew M. tuberculosis without ever having a positive AFB smear result. These data indicate that in our institution, reducing the number of negative smears required before removal of patients from the airborne precautions category would pose little, if any, increase in the risk of spreading tuberculosis.     

Comparison of the Septi-Chek AFB and BACTEC systems and conventional culture for recovery of mycobacteria.

The performance of the Septi-Chek AFB system was compared with that of the BACTEC radiometric system and that of Lowenstein-Jensen agar slants (LJ) for detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens. A total of 642 specimens were cultured; 61 (9.5%) yielded mycobacteria. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (34 isolates) and Mycobacterium avium complex (25 isolates) were the predominant species isolated. Of the 61 culture-positive specimens, 30 were smear positive and 31 were smear negative. Overall, 95% of the positive specimens were detected by Septi-Chek and BACTEC (100% of M. tuberculosis isolates) and 75% by LJ (82% of M. tuberculosis isolates). The mean times to detection were 15 days for BACTEC, 23 days for Septi-Chek, and 27 days for LJ. Of the 30 smear-positive specimens, 100% were recovered by Septi-Chek and BACTEC and 90% were recovered by LJ. Of the 31 smear-negative specimens, 90% were detected by Septi-Chek and BACTEC and 61% were detected by LJ. The Septi-Chek and BACTEC systems are superior to the conventional (LJ) mycobacterial culture method. Although Septi-Chek requires more time for the detection of mycobacteria than BACTEC, it is comparable in terms of overall recovery.     

Practical strategies for performance optimization of the enhanced gen-probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test

The enhanced Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) test was evaluated using a combined set of 338 acid-fast smear-positive and smear-negative, respiratory and nonrespiratory clinical specimens received by the Massachusetts State Tuberculosis Laboratory from September 1999 through March 2002. Microbiological culture was used as the reference method; therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of the MTD test were calculated for culture-positive specimens only. The initial assessment indicated that the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MTD test for all specimens grouped together were 62, 98, 99, and 68%, respectively. A detailed discrepancy analysis revealed that two major factors causing negative MTD results in specimens that were culture positive for M. tuberculosis complex were patient treatment with antituberculosis drugs prior to testing and the presence of inhibitory substances in the specimen. Based on these findings, a protocol for optimizing MTD test performance in this setting is proposed in which (i) specimens from patients taking antituberculosis medications are excluded from testing and (ii) all initially MTD-negative or MTD-equivocal specimens are subjected to testing for inhibitors. If this strategy was followed, the MTD test sensitivity would be at least 91%, a significant improvement over the initial sensitivity of 62%. Accordingly, the negative predictive value would increase from 68 to 91%.     

Evaluation of Gen-Probe amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test by using respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens in a tertiary care center laboratory

The performance of the Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (AMTD) test (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, Calif.) was assessed in a large tertiary care mycobacteriology laboratory. Both acid-fast smear-positive and smear-negative respiratory and nonrespiratory clinical specimens were analyzed. From February 1998 to 4 October 2001, AMTD assays were performed on 391 respiratory specimens and 164 nonrespiratory specimens. The AMTD assay was compared to the "gold standard" of combined culture and clinical diagnosis. The overall sensitivity for all specimens, including those for which no smear result was available, was 91.2%. The overall sensitivities of the assay, including acid-fast smear-positive and -negative specimens, were 97.8 and 77.3% for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens, respectively. The corresponding specificities for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens were 99.1 and 98.5%, respectively. The overall specificity for all specimens was 98.9%. Positive and negative predictive values were 93.9 and 99.7% and 91.7 and 96.4% for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens, respectively. The time saved by using the AMTD test for making a diagnosis of tuberculosis instead of using culture was 8.99 days. Inhibitors to the AMTD assay were found in 3.1% of respiratory specimens and 3.1% of nonrespiratory specimens. The assay, used in a general mycobacteriology laboratory setting, represents an important advance in improving the speed and accuracy of diagnosis in the management of patients with tuberculosis.