Accuracies of beta-lactam susceptibility test results for Pseudomonas aeruginosa with four automated systems (BD Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway, Vitek, and Vitek 2)

Contemporary clinical isolates and challenge strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested by four automated susceptibility testing systems (BD Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway, Vitek, and Vitek 2; two laboratories with each) against six broad-spectrum beta-lactams, and the results were compared to reference broth microdilution (BMD) and to consensus results from three validated methods (BMD, Etest [AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden], and disk diffusion). Unacceptable levels of error (minor, major, and very major) were detected, some with systematic biases toward false susceptibility (piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem) and others toward false resistance (aztreonam, cefepime, and ceftazidime). We encourage corrective action by the system manufacturers to address test biases, and we suggest that clinical laboratories using automated systems should consider accurate alternative methods for routine use.     

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for the identification and susceptibility testing of three species of nonfermenting gram-negative rods frequently isolated from clinical samples

VITEK 2 is a new automatic system for the identification and susceptibility testing of the most clinically important bacteria. In the present study 198 clinical isolates, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 146), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 25), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 27) were evaluated. Reference susceptibility testing of cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin, tobramycin, levofloxacin (only for P. aeruginosa), co-trimoxazole (only for S. maltophilia), and ampicillin-sulbactam and tetracycline (only for A. baumannii) was performed by microdilution (NCCLS guidelines). The VITEK 2 system correctly identified 91.6, 100, and 76% of P. aeruginosa, S. maltophilia, and A. baumannii isolates, respectively, within 3 h. The respective percentages of essential agreement (to within 1 twofold dilution) for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii were 89.0 and 88.0% (cefepime), 91.1 and 100% (cefotaxime), 95.2 and 96.0% (ceftazidime), 98.6 and 100% (ciprofloxacin), 88.4 and 100% (gentamicin), 87.0 and 92.0% (imipenem), 85.0 and 88.0% (meropenem), 84.2 and 96.0% (piperacillin), and 97.3 and 80% (tobramycin). The essential agreement for levofloxacin against P. aeruginosa was 86.3%. The percentages of essential agreement for ampicillin-sulbactam and tetracycline against A. baumannii were 88.0 and 100%, respectively. Very major errors for P. aeruginosa (resistant by the reference method, susceptible with the VITEK 2 system [resistant to susceptible]) were noted for cefepime (0.7%), cefotaxime (0.7%), gentamicin (0.7%), imipenem (1.4%), levofloxacin (2.7%), and piperacillin (2.7%) and, for one strain of A. baumannii, for imipenem. Major errors (susceptible to resistant) were noted only for P. aeruginosa and cefepime (2.0%), ceftazidime (0.7%), and piperacillin (3.4%). Minor errors ranged from 0.0% for piperacillin to 22.6% for cefotaxime against P. aeruginosa and from 0.0% for piperacillin and ciprofloxacin to 20.0% for cefepime against A. baumannii. The VITEK 2 system provided co-trimoxazole MICs only for S. maltophilia; no very major or major errors were obtained for co-trimoxazole against this species. It is concluded that the VITEK 2 system allows the rapid identification of S. maltophilia and most P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates. The VITEK 2 system can perform reliable susceptibility testing of many of the antimicrobial agents used against P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. It would be desirable if new versions of the VITEK 2 software were able to determine MICs and the corresponding clinical categories of agents active against S. maltophilia.     

Performance of Vitek 2 in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with different mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance

A total of 78 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa grouped according to the phenotype for ceftazidime and imipenem susceptibility/resistance were used to assess the accuracy of the Vitek 2 system in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Comparisons were made with a MIC gradient test for piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin. For the total of 546 isolate-antimicrobial combinations tested, the category agreement was 83.6%, with 2.0, 1.6, and 12.8% very major, major, and minor errors, respectively. Vitek 2 accuracy was influenced differently by the mechanism responsible for resistance, and interpretation of the results in relation to phenotype could improve the performance of the system.     

Continuous infusion β-lactams for intensive care unit pulmonary infections

This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion beta-lactams against pulmonary isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients managed in intensive care units (ICUs) in the USA. Multiple 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations were performed by integrating pharmacokinetic data from healthy individuals with 2408 MICs from the 2002 Intensive Care Unit Surveillance System database. These pharmacodynamic simulations suggested that continuous infusion regimens of cefepime, aztreonam, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g have the greatest likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in the ICU. Beta-lactams are unlikely to achieve pharmacodynamic targets against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii when administered as monotherapy.     

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures

This study explores the possibility of combining the BacT/Alert Microbial Detection System with the VITEK 2 system to achieve rapid bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. Direct inoculation of bacterial suspension to the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card and AST-NO09 card was made by differential centrifugation of blood cultures of organisms with gram-negative enteric bacillus-like morphology. A total of 118 strains were investigated; of these, 97 (82.2%) strains were correctly identified to the species level and 21 (17.8%) strains were not identified; by comparing the results with those of the reference method of API identification systems using a pure culture, it was found that no strain had been misidentified. Among the 21 strains with no identification, 13 (61.9%) strains were nonfermenters. The direct-identification reporting time of VITEK 2 was 3.3 h. Direct testing of susceptibility to 11 antibiotics, i.e., amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, netilmicin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tobramycin, was also performed by using the broth microdilution (MB) method according to the NCCLS guidelines as a reference. After comparing the MICs of the VITEK 2 system with those obtained by the MB method within +/-twofold dilution, it was determined that the 1,067 organism-antibiotic combinations had an overall correct rate of 97.6% (1,041 combinations). The rates of susceptibility to the 11 antibiotics ranged from 88.7 to 100%, respectively. Only two (0.2%) and four (0.4%) combinations of the susceptibility tests gave very major errors (i.e., reported as sensitive by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be resistant by the MB method) and major errors (i.e., reported as resistant by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be sensitive by the MB method), respectively. The reporting time for the direct testing of susceptibility against the 11 antibiotics for 97 blood culture isolates by the VITEK 2 system ranged from 3.3 to 17.5 h. Compared with conventional methods that require 1 or 2 days, this method can make same-day reporting possible and thus permit better patient management.     

Evaluation of VITEK 2 rapid identification and susceptibility testing system against gram-negative clinical isolates

A total of 281 strains of miscellaneous members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other gram-negative bacteria were evaluated by use of identification tests with the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux) and an API identification system (bioMérieux). A total of 237 (95%) strains were correctly identified to the species level. Only six (2.1%) strains were misidentified, and eight (2.8%) strains were not identified. Among 14 strains with discrepant identifications, 8 (57.1%) strains were nonfermenters. The susceptibilities of 228 strains to 11 antibiotics including amikacin, netilmicin, tobramycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin, and piperacillin in combination with tazobactam were tested with the VITEK 2 AST-No. 12 card and by the broth microdilution (MB) method, according to NCCLS guidelines, as a reference. For the 2,508 organism-antibiotic combinations, the rates at which duplicate MICs correlated within +/-1 dilution ranged from 84.2 to 95.6%. Only 13 (0.5%) and 10 (0.4%) of the susceptibility tests gave major errors (resistant with the VITEK 2 system but sensitive by the MB method) and very major errors (sensitive with the VITEK 2 system but resistant by the MB method), respectively. Both VITEK 2 ID-GNB (an identification system) and VITEK 2 AST-No. 12 (a susceptibility testing system) card systems gave rapid, reliable, and highly reproducible results.     

Comparison of in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against aerobic bacterial pathogens from patients with nosocomial infections.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a rapid worldwide emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in nosocomial isolates. This study compared the in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against 208 aerobic bacterial pathogens that caused 197 nosocomial infections in 184 patients. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by E test in accordance with the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. RESULTS: Most (140/208, 67%) of the isolates were facultative Gram-negative bacilli. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were the most effective (22/22, 100%) against oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. None of the antibiotics tested were found to be effective (0/25) against oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. Of the 11 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii that were not pandrug-resistant (PDR), only 9 isolates (9/11, 81%) were sensitive to imipenem and 5 isolates (5/11, 45%) were sensitive to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. Another 22 isolates of A. baumannii that were PDR were completely resistant to all 6 antibiotics. The majority of isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were sensitive to these 6 antimicrobial agents with 10/11 (91%) sensitive to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, 9/11 (83%) sensitive to ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam, and 8/11 (75%) sensitive to imipenem. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the bacterial isolates causing nosocomial infections were found to be sensitive to the 6 antibiotics tested. Bacterial isolates of nosocomial infections that were completely resistant to these 6 antibiotics were PDR A. baumannii, PDR P. aeruginosa, and oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. More potent antimicrobial agents are needed to treat infections caused by PDR A. baumannii and PDR P. aeruginosa.     

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 cards for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of non‐glucose‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli

We evaluated VITEK 2 cards (NGNC and AST‐GN10) for the accuracy of identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of non‐glucose‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli (NGF‐GNB). In a total of 201 strains, 190 strains (94.5%) were correctly identified, seven strains (3.5%) showed low discrimination, four strains (2.0%) had discrepancies, and no strain remained unidentified. Reference AST of amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, levofloxacin, piperacillin‐tazobactam, and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole was performed by the agar dilution method. Approximately 82.5% of ID and 72.9% of AST were completed within 7 and 14 h, respectively. For NGF‐GNB, other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and the Burkholderia cepacia group, essential agreements (EAs) were 93.6–100.0%. Severe disagreements (resistant by the reference method to susceptible by AST‐GN10) were observed for amikacin (0.9%), cefepime (1.8%), cefotaxime (1.8%), imipenem (0.9%), and piperacillin‐tazobactam (0.9%). One major disagreement (susceptible to resistant) was observed for ceftazidime (0.1%). For P. aeruginosa, EAs were 85.7–100%, with severe disagreements observed for cefepime (4.8%) and piperacillin‐tazobactam (4.8%). For Acinetobacter spp., EAs were 86.4–100% without disagreements. The VITEK 2 cards appear to be promising for rapid ID and reliable AST for most species of NGF‐GNB.     

Multicenter comparison of the VITEK 2 yeast susceptibility test with the CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing fluconazole against Candida spp

A fully automated commercial antifungal susceptibility test system (VITEK 2 yeast susceptibility test; bioMerieux, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) was compared in three different laboratories with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method by testing two quality control strains and a total of 426 isolates of Candida spp. (103 to 135 clinical isolates in each laboratory plus 80 challenge isolates in one laboratory) against fluconazole. Reference BMD MIC endpoints were established after 24 and 48 h of incubation. VITEK 2 endpoints were determined spectrophotometrically after 10 to 26 h of incubation (mean, 13 h). Excellent essential agreement (within two dilutions) between the VITEK 2 and the 24- and 48-h BMD MICs was observed. The overall agreement values were 97.9 and 93.7%, respectively. Both intra- and interlaboratory agreement was 100%. The overall categorical agreement between VITEK 2 and BMD was 97.2% at the 24-h BMD time point and 88.3% at the 48-h BMD time point. Decreased categorical agreement at 48 h was attributed to trailing growth observed with Candida glabrata. The VITEK 2 system reliably detected fluconazole resistance among Candida spp. and demonstrated excellent quantitative and qualitative agreement with the reference BMD method.     

Multicenter comparison of the VITEK 2 antifungal susceptibility test with the CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing amphotericin B, flucytosine, and voriconazole against Candida spp

A fully automated commercial antifungal susceptibility test system (VITEK 2; bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, MO) was compared in three different laboratories with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly the NCCLS) reference broth microdilution method (BMD) by testing 2 quality control strains, 10 reproducibility strains, and 426 isolates of Candida spp. against amphotericin B, flucytosine, and voriconazole. Reference BMD MIC endpoints were established after 24 and 48 h of incubation. VITEK 2 system MIC endpoints were determined spectrophotometrically after 9.1 to 27.1 h of incubation (mean, 12 to 14 h). Excellent essential agreement (within 2 dilutions) between the VITEK 2 system and the 24- and 48-h BMD MICs was observed for all three antifungal agents: amphotericin B, 99.1% and 97%, respectively; flucytosine, 99.1% and 98.8%, respectively; and voriconazole, 96.7% and 96%, respectively. Both intra- and interlaboratory agreements were >98% for all three drugs. The overall categorical agreements between the VITEK 2 system and BMD for flucytosine and voriconazole were 98.1 to 98.6% at the 24-h BMD time point and 96.9 to 97.4% at the 48-h BMD time point. The VITEK 2 system reliably detected flucytosine and voriconazole resistance among Candida spp. and demonstrated excellent quantitative and qualitative agreement with the reference BMD method.     

Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antibiotics isolated from patients of intensive care units in France in 1998. Resistant phenotypes to beta-lactams

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is responsible for nosocomial infections and demonstrates many types of resistance mechanisms to antibiotics. Thus, in vitro susceptibility survey are frequently required. In this study, susceptibility has been assessed on 105 non redundant consecutive strains isolated from ICU's in 18 general hospitals, from 01.02.98 to 30.06.98. Only clinically significant samples have been considered. MICs have been measured for nine beta-lactams, three aminoglycosides, one fluoroquinolone and colistine. For ticarcilline resistant strains, phenotype has been assessed on Mueller-Hinton medium supplemented with beta-lactamases inhibitor. Transferable beta-lactamases has been identified using pl and PCR. MIC 50 and MIC 90 (mg/L) for beta-lactams are the following (MIC 50-->90): ticarcilline (16-->512), ticarcilline + clavulanic acid (16-->512), piperacilline (4-->512), pipéracilline + tazobactam (4-->64), aztreonam (4-->16), cefsulodine (4-->32), ceftazidime (2-->16), cefepime (4-->16), imipeneme (1-->8). For aminoglycosides: gentamicine (2-->32), tobramycine (1-->32), amikacine (4-->16). For ciprofloxacine (0.25-->32) and colistine (0.5-->2). According to CA-SFM break points recommendations, 50% of isolated strains are resistant to gentamicine, one out of three for ticarcilline + clavulanic acid (29%), one out of four for tobramycine (25%) and ciprofloxacine (25%), one out of ten for amikacine (9%), tazocilline (8%) and imipeneme (9%). Resistance to ceftazidime and aztreonam is uncommon (respectively 2%-1%) and never observed for cefepim. For ticarcilline resistant strains, (38% of total isolates) the following phenotypes have been detected: 6.7% non enzymatic resistance, 15.2% transferable beta-lactamase (TEM 4.8%, CARB 4.8%, TEM + CARB 4.8% and OXA-10 and derivated 0.9%) and 16.2% high level cephalosporinase. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase has never been detected. TEM beta-lactamase is associated with resistance to amikacine and ciprofloxacine.     

Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae by use of the bioMerieux VITEK 2

The VITEK 2 is a new automated instrument for rapid organism identification and susceptibility testing. It has the capability of performing rapid susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with specially configured cards that contain enriched growth medium and antimicrobial agents relevant for this organism. The present study compared the results of testing of a group of 53 challenge strains of pneumococci with known resistance properties and a collection of clinical isolates examined in two study phases with a total of 402 and 416 isolates, respectively, with a prototype of the VITEK 2. Testing was conducted in three geographically separate laboratories; the challenge collection was tested by all three laboratories, and the unique clinical isolates were tested separately by the individual laboratories. The VITEK 2 results of tests with 10 antimicrobial agents were compared to the results generated by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth microdilution MIC test method. Excellent interlaboratory agreement was observed with the challenge strains. The overall agreement within a single twofold dilution of MICs defined by the VITEK 2 and reference method with the clinical isolates was 96.3%, although there were a number of off-scale MICs that could not be compared. The best agreement with the clinical isolates was achieved with ofloxacin and chloramphenicol (100%), and the lowest level of agreement among those drugs with sufficient on-scale MICs occurred with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (89.7%). Overall there were 1.3% very major, 6.6% minor, and no major interpretive category errors encountered with the clinical isolates, although >80% of the minor interpretive errors involved only a single log(2) dilution difference. The mean time for generation of susceptibility results with the clinical isolates was 8.1 h. The VITEK 2 provided rapid, reliable susceptibility category determinations with both the challenge and clinical isolates examined in this study.     

Comparison of disk diffusion, VITEK 2, and broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test results for unusual species of Enterobacteriaceae

We compared the antimicrobial susceptibility testing results generated by disk diffusion and the VITEK 2 automated system with the results of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method for 61 isolates of unusual species of Enterobacteriaceae. The isolates represented 15 genera and 26 different species, including Buttiauxella, Cedecea, Kluyvera, Leminorella, and Yokenella. Antimicrobial agents included aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. CLSI interpretative criteria for Enterobacteriaceae were used. Of the 12 drugs tested by BMD and disk diffusion, 10 showed >95% categorical agreement (CA). CA was lower for ampicillin (80.3%) and cefazolin (77.0%). There were 3 very major errors (all with cefazolin), 1 major error (also with cefazolin), and 26 minor errors. Of the 40 isolates (representing 12 species) that could be identified with the VITEK 2 database, 36 were identified correctly to species level, 1 was identified to genus level only, and 3 were reported as unidentified. VITEK 2 generated MIC results for 42 (68.8%) of 61 isolates, but categorical interpretations (susceptible, intermediate, and resistant) were provided for only 22. For the 17 drugs tested by both BMD and VITEK 2, essential agreement ranged from 80.9 to 100% and CA ranged from 68.2% (ampicillin) to 100%; thirteen drugs exhibited 100% CA. In summary, disk diffusion provides a reliable alternative to BMD for testing of unusual Enterobacteriaceae, some of which cannot be tested, or produce incorrect results, by automated methods.     

Quality control for beta-lactam susceptibility testing with a well-defined collection of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in Spain

Eighteen Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, 16 of them with well-defined beta-lactam resistance mechanisms, were sent to 52 Spanish microbiology laboratories. Interpretative categories for 8 extended-spectrum beta-lactams were collected. Participating laboratories used their own routine susceptibility testing procedures (88% automatic systems, 10% disk diffusion, and 2% agar dilution). Control results were established by two independent reference laboratories by applying the NCCLS microdilution method and interpretative criteria. Interpretative discrepancies were observed in 16% of the results (4.4% for cefepime, 3.0% for aztreonam, 2.8% for piperacillin-tazobactam, 1.7% for cefotaxime [CTX] and ceftazidime, 1.1% for ceftriaxone, 0.9% for meropenem, and 0.3% for imipenem). High consistency with reference values (<5% of major plus very major errors) was observed with (i) American Type Culture Collection quality control strains; (ii) strains with low-efficiency mechanisms inactivating extended-spectrum beta-lactams, such as OXA-1-producing Escherichiacoli or SHV-1-hyperproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae; (iii) strains with highly efficient mechanisms, such as SHV-5 porin-deficient K. pneumoniae, CTX-M-10 in Enterobacter cloacae hyperproducing AmpC, and P. aeruginosa with the MexAB OprM efflux phenotype or hyperproducing AmpC. Low consistency (>30% major plus very major errors) was detected in K1-producing Klebsiella oxytoca, CTX-M-9-producing E. coli, and in OprD(-) P. aeruginosa strains. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains accounted for 86% of very major errors. Recognition of the ESBL phenotype was particularly low in Enterobacter cloacae strains (<35%), due to the lack of NCCLS-specific rules in this genus. A K1-producing K. oxytoca was misidentified by 10% of laboratories as an ESBL producer. The use of well-defined resistant strains is useful for improving proficiency in susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories.     

Development of resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained from patients with cystic fibrosis at different times

Objective  Determination of the extent of changes in quantitative resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis over a period of approximately 2 years.
Methods  Three hundred and ninety nine isolates of P. aeruginosa collected from 34 pediatric patients in the period between April 1994 and April 1996 were investigated. During the 2 years the children were treated with a combination of a betalactam and an aminoglycoside, approximately every 3 months. In between they received ciprofloxacin orally, when required. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 38 clones of P. aeruginosa defined by different patterns in macrorestriction analysis (pulse field gel electrophoresis, PFGE) were established for 12 antibiotics: gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, and piperacillin by means of broth microdilution tests according to DIN 58940.
Results  Twenty-four of the 38 clones developed increased MIC values during the time of observation especially for aminoglycosides and quinolones. Comparatively less affected were ceftazidime, imipenem and meropenem. An association between the number of the intravenous treatment courses and the increase of the MIC values could not be verified.
Conclusions  A trend towards an increase of the MICs against antipseudomonal agents was observed over a limited period of time. It is necessary to prevent this development possibly by employing suitable combinations of antibiotics and the introduction of new substances.     

Potential Impact of the VITEK 2 System and the Advanced Expert System on the Clinical Laboratory of a University-Based Hospital

A study was designed to assess the impact of the VITEK 2 automated system and the Advanced Expert System (AES) on the clinical laboratory of a typical university-based hospital. A total of 259 consecutive, nonduplicate isolates of Enterobacteriaceae members, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were collected and tested by the VITEK 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and the results were analyzed by the AES. The results were also analyzed by a human expert and compared to the AES analyses. Among the 259 isolates included in this study, 245 (94.6%) were definitively identified by VITEK 2, requiring little input from laboratory staff. For 194 (74.9%) isolates, no inconsistencies between the identification of the strain and the antimicrobial susceptibility determined by VITEK 2 were detected by the AES. Thus, no input from laboratory staff was required for these strains. The AES suggested one or more corrections to results obtained with 65 strains to remove inconsistencies. The human expert thought that most of these corrections were appropriate and that some resulted from a failure of the VITEK 2 system to detect certain forms of resistance. Antimicrobial phenotypes assigned to the strains by the AES for beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, quinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines, and glycopeptides were similar to those assigned by the human expert for 95.7 to 100% of strains. These results indicate that the VITEK 2 system and AES can provide accurate information in tests for most of the clinical isolates examined and remove the need for human analysis of results for many. Certain problems were identified in the study that should be remediable with further work on the software supporting the AES.     

Comparative in vitro activity of 2 monobactams (RO 172301 (AMA 1080)and aztreonam), ceftazidime and cefotaxime on Gram-negative bacilli

In vitro activities of two monobactams (RO 172301 and aztreonam), ceftazidime and cefotaxime against 739 bacterial strains belonging to different species of Gram negative aero-anaerobic bacilli were studied comparatively. Strains were studied according to their resistance phenotype to beta-lactams. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the four antibiotics were determined using the agar dilution method. RO 172301 and aztreonam exhibited a similar activity against P. aeruginosa with a MIC around 2 mg/l for 50% of strains and around 4 mg/l for 90% of strains. As compared to the two monobactams, ceftazidime was more active and cefotaxime less active (one halving dilution either way). Activity of antibiotics was not dependent upon the mechanism of resistance to beta-lactams, except for strains producing a constitutive cephalosporinase. Against Enterobacteriaceae, RO 172301 proved slightly more active than aztreonam and cefotaxime; ceftazidime was the least active drug. Only 12 of the 739 strains tested (1.6%) had a MIC for RO 172301 above 32 mg/l. The percentage of resistant strains was 2.4% for aztreonam and ceftazidime and 8.8% for cefotaxime.     

Activity in vitro of twelve antibiotics against clinical isolates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli

Twelve beta-lactam and non-beta-lactam antibiotics were evaluated against 115 clinical isolates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing (ESBLs) Escherichia coli using a broth microdilution test in accordance with the CLSI guidelines. Susceptibility was 100% with imipenem, ertapenem and amikacin, 95.7% with piperacillin-tazobactam, 91.3% with cefoxitin, 87% with tobramycin, 81.7% with amoxicillin-clavulanate, 80% with cefepime, 67.8% with ceftazidime, 27.8% with ciprofloxacin, 27% with levofloxacin and 13% with ceftriaxone. Ertapenem was the antibiotic with the lowest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for all isolates. There were no clinically relevant differences in the activity of the antibiotics in the presence of CTX-M-9 or SHV enzymes.     

Effect of basic amino acids on susceptibility to carbapenems in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

We evaluated effects of medium composition, including basic amino acid content and pH, on susceptibility to carbapenems such as imipenem, panipenem and meropenem, in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Susceptibility to carbapenems was reduced by basic amino acids in the medium, while susceptibilities to ceftazidime and aztreonam were not. Among carbapenems, susceptibility to panipenem was most sharply reduced by addition of basic amino acids to 1:16 Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA). In 174 of 175 clinical isolates, MICs for carbapenems were affected to different degrees by medium composition. One isolate, in which MICs for carbapenems did not differ between MHA and 1:16 MHA, showed reduced production of porin (OprD). Our results suggest that susceptibility to individual carbapenems, especially panipenem, is difficult to evaluate based on MICs for other carbapenems determined on MHA. For a better prediction of antibiotic efficacy, it may be important to evaluate the susceptibility for each carbapenem individually.     

In vitro activity of beta-lactam antibiotics against CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli

Beta-lactam antibiotics have been discussed as options for the treatment of infections caused by multiresistant extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria if the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is low. The objective of this study was to investigate the in vitro activity of different beta-lactam antibiotics against CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli. A total of 198 isolates of E. coli with the ESBL phenotype were studied. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of CTX-M genes and amplicon sequencing were performed. The MICs for amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftibuten, ertapenem, imipenem, mecillinam, meropenem, piperacillin–tazobactam, and temocillin were determined with the Etest. Susceptibility was defined according to the breakpoints of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values were calculated. Isolates from CTX-M group 9 showed higher susceptibility to the beta-lactam antibiotics tested than isolates belonging to CTX-M group 1. More than 90% of the isolates belonging to CTX-M group 9 were susceptible to amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, ceftibuten, piperacillin–tazobactam, and temocillin. The susceptibility was high to mecillinam, being 91%, regardless of the CTX-M group. All isolates were susceptible to imipenem and meropenem, and 99% to ertapenem. This study shows significant differences in susceptibility to different beta-lactam antibiotics among the CTX-M-producing E. coli isolates and a significant difference for many antibiotics tested between the CTX-M-producing groups 1 and 9. The good in vitro activity of other beta-lactam antibiotics compared to carbapenems indicate that clinical studies are warranted in order to examine the potential role of these beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of infections caused by multiresistant ESBL-producing E. coli.