Potential predictive value of Bcl-2 for response to tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting of node-positive breast cancer

Approximately 50% of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) and 70%-80% of patients with ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive BC respond to hormonal therapy. Additional predictive markers are needed. A group of 287 patients with ER- and/or PgR-positive tumors was selected from 804 patients previously enrolled in a multicenter phase III trial. Bcl-2 expression was evaluated and correlated with response to adjuvant tamoxifen and survival. Estrogen receptor and PgR were determined by biochemical means and Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry. With a median follow-up of 76 months (95 relapses and 60 deaths), of the 287 patients with, 187 (65%) had Bcl-2-positive tumors and 78 of these patients received tamoxifen. Of the 100 patients with Bcl-2-negative disease, 51 received tamoxifen and 49 regular follow-up. Using patients treated with tamoxifen as a reference, a univariate analysis of disease-free interval for patients who did not receive tamoxifen showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.42 (95% CI, 0.82-2.44; P = 0.21) for patients with Bcl-2-positive disease and a HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 0.55-1.99; P = 0.89) for patients with Bcl-2-negative disease (P = 0.48). After adjusting for number of positive lymph nodes, degree of receptor and PgR positivity, and type of surgery, the HRs were 1.54 (95% CI, 0.87-2.73; P = 0.14) for Bcl-2-positive disease and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.52-2.11; P = 0.88) for Bcl-2-negative disease. Despite its being a retrospective nonrandomized study with a relatively low number of patients, our results suggest that Bcl-2 deserves further evaluation as a predictive factor of sensitivity to tamoxifen.     

P(185/Her2) and ps2 protein overexpression in breast-cancer specimens - improvement for prediction of response to endocrine therapy

Simultaneous analyses of p(185/Her2) and pS2 protein expression in breast cancer is discussed to add information about prognosis and response to endocrine treatment. In a retrospective study, expression of p(185/Her2) and pS2 protein were detected by immunohistochemistry in paraffinembedded, formalin-fixed sections of 219 primary breast cancers. Median age was 56.6 years, median follow-up 168 months. Results were correlated with clinical parameters and steroid receptor status. ER was positive in 55%, PgR in 54% of the tumors. ER correlated inversely with tumor size, and with tumor grade. pS2 was detected in 54% of the tumors, but showed no correlations with other parameters. p(185/Her2) was present in 24% of the tumors and correlated positively with tumor size. pS2 and ER or PgR status correlated (p<0.001). In the sub-group of negative steroid receptors and positive pS2 a qualitative significant difference for p(185/Her2) expression was seen. ER, pS2 and p(185/Her2) status had no prognostic impact on disease-free or overall survival; PgR status correlated with clinical outcome.     

Changes in tumor expression of HER2 and hormone receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 21 755 patients from the Japanese breast cancer registry

BackgroundWe investigate rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and tumor expression of ER, PgR, HER2 discordance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using Japanese breast cancer registry data.Patients and methodsRecords of more than 300 000 breast cancer cases treated at 800 hospitals from 2004 to 2013 were retrieved from the breast cancer registry. After data cleanup, we included 21 755 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had no distant metastases. pCR was defined as no invasive tumor in the breast detected during surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. HER2 overexpression was determined immunohistochemically and/or using fluorescence in situ hybridization.ResultspCR was achieved in 5.7% of luminal tumors (n = 8730), 24.6% of HER2-positive tumors (n = 4403), and 18.9% of triple-negative tumors (n = 3660). Among HER2-positive tumors, pCR was achieved in 31.6% of ER-negative tumors (n = 2252), 17.0% of ER-positive ones (n = 2132), 31.4% of patients who received trastuzumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 2437), and 16.2% of patients who did not receive trastuzumab (n = 1966). Of the 2811 patients who were HER2-positive before treatment, 601 (21.4%) had HER2-negative tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 340 (3.4%) of the 9947 patients with HER2-negative tumors before treatment had HER2-positive tumors afterward. Of the 10 973 patients with ER-positive tumors before treatment, 499 (4.6%) had ER-negative tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 519 (9.3%) of the 5607 patients who were ER-negative before treatment had ER-positive tumors afterward.ConclusionWe confirmed that loss of HER2-positive status can occur after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer. We also confirmed that in practice, differences in pCR rates between breast cancer subtypes are the same as in clinical trials. Our data strongly support the need for retest ER, PgR, HER2 of surgical sample after neoadjuvant therapy in order to accurately determine appropriate use of targeted therapy.     

Co-expressed type of ER and HER2 protein as a predictive factor in determining resistance to antiestrogen therapy in patients with ER-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to analyze whether inter-site variation types on estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 expression may be a predictive factor for evaluating the effectiveness of endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer. A total of 366 consecutive women with invasive breast cancer who had undergone curative surgical treatment between 1996 and 2001 were included in this study. ER status was evaluated using the Allred score and HER-2 status was evaluated according to the HercepTest. In ER-positive and HER2-positive tumors, the expression of ER and HER2 was described as the co-expressed type or the differently expressed type using double staining with ER and HER2. Of the 366 patients, 249 (68.1%) were positive for ER and 74 (20.2%) were positive for HER2. ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors were found in 221 patients (60.4%), ER-negative and HER2-negative in 71 (19.4%), ER-negative and HER-2-positive in 46 (12.6%), and ER-positive and HER2-positive in 28 (7.7%). HER2 status was inversely correlated (p<0.01) with ER status. In ER-positive tumors, an inverse correlation between ER and HER2 was also observed. The co-expressed type was found in 10 patients, and the differently expressed type was found in 18. There was no difference in tumor size and nodal involvement between the two types. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival between patients with the co-expressed type tumor and the differently expressed type tumor. In patients with the differently expressed type tumor, those who received antiestrogen therapy showed a significantly better disease-free survival rate than those who did not receive antiestrogen therapy. As for patients with the co-expressed type of tumor, no significant difference in disease-free survival was observed between patients with and without antiestrogen treatment. The present study suggests that the co-expressed type of tumour might be a resistant factor to antiestrogen therapy in ER-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer.     

pS2 protein: a marker improving prediction of response to neoadjuvant tamoxifen in post-menopausal breast cancer patients.

Tamoxifen as sole initial therapy is gaining importance in the management of post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Age oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor status are accurately considered to select patients for hormonal treatment. However, additional markers are needed. By immunohistochemistry (IHC), we studied tumour expression of ER, PR, pS2, c-erbB-2 and glutathione S-transferase pi (GST pi) on initial core biopsies of 208 post-menopausal patients with a non-metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma, treated by neoadjuvant tamoxifen therapy. A good response to tamoxifen was defined as tumoral regression > or = 50% (110 patients). Relationship between response and age, tumour size, T, N, histological grade, ER and PR contents evaluated by radioimmunoassay, ER, PR, pS2, c-erbB-2 and GST pi expression evaluated by IHC were studied. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that tumoral regression was linked only to pS2 (P = 0.004) and ER (P = 0.018) IHC expression. According to the immunohistochemical profile, three groups could be defined: pS2- and ER-positive tumours, pS2- or ER-positive tumours and pS2- and ER-negative tumours with response rates of 60%, 45% and 8% respectively. Although prospective studies are needed to confirm these results, we conclude that pS2 and ER immunohistochemical status are useful tools for predicting tumour regression with neoadjuvant tamoxifen in post-menopausal breast carcinoma patients.     

Measurement of steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer patients on tamoxifen

Summary Estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) positive breast tumors often respond to tamoxifen, but ultimately progress as they become tamoxifen resistant. An accurate assessment of receptor status in specimens from tamoxifen-resistant patients could help to understand potential mechanisms of resistance and to predict response to second line hormonal therapies. However, since tamoxifen itself can affect ER and PgR determinations, assay results can be misleading. We measured ER and PgR by both ligand binding (LBA) and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays in 34 tumors from patients on tamoxifen, 30 of whom were displaying resistance to the drug. These tumors were classified into several receptor phenotypes. Eleven patients, 8 of whom were clearly progressing, expressed both receptors while on tamoxifen. ER was significantly less often negative when measured by IHC, suggesting that ER status by LBA was falsely negative in this group due to receptor occupancy by tamoxifen. Six patients had no detectable ER by LBA or IHC but still expressed PgR. The presence of PgR suggests that ER could still be functional, though undetectable, in these tumors, or that PgR is constitutively expressed by them. Finally, 12 patients were ER and PgR-negative by both assays, suggesting hormonal independence as the mechanism for resistance in this group. In a subset of patients with receptor assays both prior to tamoxifen and at the time of progression while taking the drug, we found that most ER-positive tumors converted to an apparent ER-negative status when assayed by LBA, while PgR status frequently remained unchanged. The continued expression of ER and/or PgR in many patients with tumor progression on tamoxifen indicates that mechanisms for resistance other than receptor loss are common in breast cancer.Deceased     

Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor levels in estrogen receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: results of a prospective Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol 8228 is a prospective trial designed to investigate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. This study was undertaken because the value of PgR measurements in advanced breast cancer had been assessed previously only in studies that were small, retrospective, or included heterogeneously treated patients. METHODS: Receptor assays were performed only in the laboratories that met strict quality control guidelines. Of the 398 patients entered, 342 patients were eligible and assessable for the study end points of objective clinical response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis shows that elevated PgR levels significantly and independently correlated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen, longer time to treatment failure, and longer overall survival. Overall response rate (defined as complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD] for greater than 6 months) in this trial was 54%. Response rates to tamoxifen were 43%, 53%, and 61% in subsets of patients with less than 10, 10 to 99, and more than 100 fmol/mg PgR, respectively. Exploratory subset analysis using PgR and other prognostic variables identified ER-positive patient subsets with response rates to tamoxifen ranging from 24% (premenopausal patients) to 86% (postmenopausal patients with ER greater than 38 and PgR greater than 329 fmol/mg). No groups of ER-positive patients were identified who had such a low response rate as to absolutely preclude considering the use of tamoxifen. Multivariate analysis showed the independent, statistically significant predictors were: for response to tamoxifen, menopausal status, PgR, and ER; for time to treatment failure, menopausal status, disease-free interval (DFI), PgR, and ER; and for overall survival DFI, PgR, ER, site of disease, and history of adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that knowledge of PgR levels together with other clinical information can improve the pretreatment assessment of ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.     

HER-2 amplification impedes the antiproliferative effects of hormone therapy in estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer.

In experimental models, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) amplification leads to estrogen independence and tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human breast cancer cells. Some but not all reports suggest an association between HER-2 positivity and hormone independence in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the antiproliferative effects of endocrine therapy in HER-2-positive/ER-positive primary human breast cancer. The effect on proliferation (Ki67) of hormone therapy was assessed at 2 weeks and/or 12 weeks in biopsies from 115 primary breast cancers with ER-positive tumors. The patients took part in one of 3 neoadjuvant trials of hormonal therapy with a SERM (tamoxifen or idoxifene) or an aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole or vorozole). HER-2 status was assessed by immunocytochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Fifteen patients were defined as HER-2 positive by both immunohistochemistry and FISH, with the remaining 100 patients HER-2 negative. Geometric mean Ki67 levels were substantially higher in HER-2-positive than HER-2-negative tumors (27.7% versus 11.5%, respectively; P = 0.003). In HER-2-negative patients, Ki67 was reduced by 62 and 71% at 2 and 12 weeks, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both), but HER-2-positive patients showed no significant fall. The proportional change in Ki67 was significantly different between HER-2-positive and -negative patients (P = 0.014 at 2 weeks; P = 0.047 at 12 weeks). Mean ER levels were lower in the HER-2-positive patients (P = 0.06) but the change in Ki67 was impeded even in those with high ER. Apoptotic index was reduced by 30% at 2 weeks in the HER-2-negative group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in apoptotic index between the groups. It is concluded that ER-positive/HER-2-positive primary breast carcinomas show an impeded antiproliferative response to endocrine therapy that nonetheless may vary between individual treatments. This together with high baseline proliferation is likely to translate to poor clinical response.     

Prediction of relapse and survival in breast cancer patients by pS2 protein status

Application of systemic adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer patients requires a more accurate identification of patients at high risk for recurrence. We have quantitatively assessed the cytosolic levels of estrogen-regulated pS2 protein in tumors of 205 breast cancer patients (median follow-up, 47 mo). There were no significant associations between the level of pS2 protein and tumor size, lymph node status, and differentiation grade. Using length of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) as end points, 11 ng of pS2 protein/mg of cytosol protein were found as the best cutoff level to discriminate between positive (pS2+) and negative (pS2-). Patients with pS2- tumors showed significantly shorter RFS and OS (P less than 0.0001) than patients with pS2+ tumors. Also after adjustment for tumor size, lymph node status, and estrogen receptor (ER) status, pS2 negativity was associated with earlier recurrence and death. Tumors positive for pS2 (55 of 205, 27%) were almost exclusively confined to the subclass of ER+ tumors (53 of 55, 96%). The death rate for patients with pS2+ tumors was one-tenth of the death rate for patients with pS2-/ER- tumors. In the patients with ER+ tumors, the prognostic power of the pS2 status was especially present in patients whose tumors were also positive for the progesterone receptor (5-yr RFS and OS, 85% and 97% for ER+/PgR+/pS2+ tumors compared with 50% and 54% for the patients with ER+/PgR+/pS2- tumors). In patients with axillary lymph node involvement (N+), pS2 status could discriminate strongly between a good and bad prognosis group (5-yr RFS and OS, 65% and 88% for N+/pS2+ compared with 32% and 34% for N+/pS2-). A similar phenomenon was observed in patients without axillary lymph node involvement (5-yr RFS and OS, 89% and 95% for N0/pS2+ compared with 58% and 82% for N0/pS2-). We conclude that the pS2 status of human primary breast tumors is an important variable for the identification of patients at high risk for recurrence and death. Knowledge of the cytosolic pS2 status appeared of particular importance to identify patients at high risk in the ER+/PgR+ subclass of tumors, and in both the N0 and N+ subclasses of patients.     

Effects of high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in advanced breast cancer, with special reference to prior endocrine therapy and hormone receptors

Forty-six patients with advanced breast cancer were treated orally with high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and a 28% (2 CRs, 11 PRs) response rate was obtained. The patient groups that showed a favorable response to MPA were as follows: patients in a postmenopausal state, with soft tissue or bone metastases, with slow-growing tumors, without prior therapy or with good response to prior endocrine therapy, and with positive estrogen (ER)- and/or progesterone (PgR) receptors. Six of 10 patients who had responded to prior endocrine therapy responded to MPA, while only 2 of 23 who had not responded to prior endocrine therapy showed a good response to MPA. There was a significant difference in response to MPA between patients with positive ER or PgR and those with negative ER or PgR tumors. The ER detected in primary or initially relapsed tumors correlated well with the effects of MPA given as a 2nd-line endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. The possible roles of MPA in the treatment of advanced breast cancer were discussed.     

Lack of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in the plasma membrane is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in breast cancer

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), or GPR30, is a membrane receptor reported to mediate non-genomic estrogen responses. Tamoxifen is a partial agonist at GPER in vitro. Here, we investigated if GPER expression is prognostic in primary breast cancer, if the receptor is treatment-predictive for adjuvant tamoxifen, and if receptor subcellular localization has any impact on the prognostic value. Total and plasma membrane (PM) GPER expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in breast tumors from 742 postmenopausal lymph node-negative patients subsequently randomized for tamoxifen treatment for 2–5 years versus no systemic treatment, regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status, and with a median follow-up of 17 years for patients free of event. PM GPER expression was a strong independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis in breast cancer without treatment-predictive information for tamoxifen. In the tamoxifen-treated ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive patient subgroup, the absence of PM GPER (53 % of all ER-positive tumors) predicted 91 % 20-year distant disease-free survival, compared to 73 % in the presence of GPER (p = 0.001). Total GPER expression showed positive correlations with ER and PgR and negative correlation with histological grade, but the correlations were biphasic. On the other hand, PM GPER expression showed strong negative correlations with ER and PgR, and strong positive correlation with HER2 overexpression and high histological grade. GPER overexpression and PM localization are critical events in breast cancer progression, and lack of GPER in the PM is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in ER-positive and PgR-positive tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancer.     

Expression of ps2 protein in endometrial carcinomas: Correlation with clinicopathologic features and sex steroid receptor status

Using immunohistochemistry, we examined pS2 expression in 64 samples of endometrial carcinoma, 11 samples of endometrial hyperplasia and 15 samples of normal endometrium, and compared them with clinicopathological data, estrogen receptor (ER) expression and progesterone receptor (PR) expression. Of the 64 samples of endometrial carcinoma, 45 (70%) expressed the pS2 protein. The average age of the patients with pS2-positive carcinomas (54.8 ± 8.6 years) was significantly lower than that of the patients with pS2-negative carcinomas, and all premenopausal patients were positive for the pS2 protein. Among histological types, pS2 expression was observed in 33 (92%) of the 36 G1 carcinomas, but in none of the 5 nonendometrioid carcinomas. Of the 48 ER-positive carcinomas, 43 (90%) were pS2-positive and 5 were pS2-negative. Of the 40 PR-positive carcinomas, 37 (93%) were positive for pS2. There were significant associations between pS2 expression and ER/PR expression (p < 0.001). Staining of the pS2 protein was also observed in the samples of normal endometrium. We found a progressive increase in immunoreactivity of pS2 protein from normal endometrium to endometrial hyperplasia and still more in well-differentiated carcinoma. All 11 cases of endometrial hyperplasia were strongly positive for pS2. Furthermore, patients with pS2-positive carcinomas had a better survival rate than those with pS2-negative carcinomas (p < 0.05). Our data suggest that pS2 expression is likely correlated with estrogen-related endometrial carcinoma and is possibly involved in early disease progression. Int. J. Cancer 74:237-244, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Progesterone receptor loss identifies luminal-type local advanced breast cancer with poor survival in patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of progesterone receptor (PgR) as a biomarker for differentiating estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with different prognoses. A total of 327 consecutive, locally advanced breast cancer patients with ER-positive disease were included in this study. According to their HER-2 and Ki-67 status, the patients were classified into the Luminal-A or Luminal-B subtype. We evaluated the clinical and pathological response to NCT and relapse or death occurring during follow-up according to PgR status in the different luminal subtypes. In the Luminal-B subtype, patients with PgR- tumors had a relatively higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (29.5% vs. 4.7% pCR, P < 0.001) and Miller-Payne grades (45.5% vs. 23.5% of grade 4-5, P = 0033) compared to PgR+ tumors. In Luminal-B patients with residual tumor after NCT, PgR loss was also independently correlated with poor relapse-free survival (P = 0.017; HR = 0.430; PgR- as a reference) and overall survival (P = 0.013; HR = 0.355; PgR- as a reference). However, in the Luminal-A subtype, there were no statistically significant differences between PgR+ and PgR- disease in response to NCT or survival. Our findings have demonstrated the prognostic value of PgR loss in the neoadjuvant setting, indicating that ER+/PgR- Luminal-B tumors warrant further attention due to their high risk of relapse after primary treatment.     

Phase II trial of combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, cisplatin, and infusional 5-fluorouracil (CCF) plus trastuzumab as preoperative treatment for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer

BackgroundPegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was shown as active but less toxic compared to doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer. Given its low cardiotoxicity, the combination of PLD and trastuzumab appears most attractive in the treatment of human epidermal factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: We investigated the activity of 8 courses of PLD in combination with cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (CCF) plus 3-week trastuzumab in patients with primary or recurrent cT2-T4 a-d, N0-3, M0 any estrogen receptor (ER), HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients with ER and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) ≥ 10% tumors received also letrozole (plus triptorelin if premenopausal). The principal endpoint was clinical response rate; secondary endpoints were the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and the cardiac safety of the combination. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study and all are evaluable for response and toxicity. Fifteen patients (47%) had ER-positive tumors, 15 patients and 2 patients had ER absent and ER poor tumors, respectively. Thirteen patients (41%) had inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and 84% of patients had clinically positive nodes. A clinical response rate of 94% (95% CI, 79%-99%) and a pCR rate of 41% (95% CI, 24%-59%) were observed. Fifty-four percent of patients with IBC obtained a pCR. Eleven patients discontinued treatment before completing 8 courses as planned. No patient developed relevant cardiac toxicity. Conclusion: In this series of very locally advanced breast cancer, the combination of CCF and trastuzumab was very active obtaining an impressive rate of pCR, particularly in IBC, which merits further investigation in larger series.     

Results of two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen correlated to steroid receptor and S-phase levels

A Swedish cooperative trial demonstrated that 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen was more beneficial than 2 years of tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, early stage, invasive breast cancer. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the importance of progesterone receptor (PgR) and ER concentration levels for patients participating in the trial and still distant recurrence free two years after the primary operation. Subgroup analyses revealed that only patients with ER positive and PgR positive breast cancer had improved distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) by prolonged tamoxifen therapy (p=0.0016). Patients with ER negative and PgR negative as well as ER positive and PgR negative tumors showed no significant effect of prolonged tamoxifen (p=0.53 and p=0.80, respectively). The percentage of ER negative and PgR positive breast cancers was too small (2.2%) for any meaningful subgroup analysis. There was a significant positive trend that the concentration level of PgR (high positive vs. low positive vs. negative) decreased the recurrence rate for those with prolonged therapy. No corresponding pattern was found for the ER content. S-phase fraction did not correlate to the recurrence rate of PgR positive breast cancers. Patients recurring during tamoxifen therapy had receptor negative tumors to a greater extent than those recurring after tamoxifen treatment.In conclusion, prolonged tamoxifen therapy for 5 years instead of 2 years was found to be beneficial for patients with ER positive and PgR positive breast cancer, whereas three extra years of tamoxifen had little or no effect for patients with ER positive but PgR negative tumors as well as for steroid receptor negative patients.     

The influence of hormone receptors and hormonal adjuvant therapy on disease-free survival in breast cancer: a multifactorial analysis

The prognostic value of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor status and the influence of hormonal adjuvant therapy on disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer were evaluated in 680 women after radical and modified radical mastectomy. The effect of 17 variables, including clinical data, TNM, hormone receptor status, histology and adjuvant therapy, on the DFS observed was analyzed, using a multivariate proportional hazard model. Multifactorial analysis revealed that DFS was strongly related to the number of positive axillary nodes (P < 0.001) and the histological grade of the tumor (P = 0.05). Moreover, the DFS of ER-positive patients with node involvement was significantly improved by hormonal adjuvant therapy (tamoxifen). Combination of adjuvant chemotherapy with hormonal therapy did not enhance its effectiveness. Recurrence rates of either node-negative or ER-negative patients were not affected by either adjuvant therapy. When no systemic therapy was given, no significant relationship between ER or PgR content of the tumor and the DFS was observed. These findings suggest that hormone receptor status is not an independent prognostic factor but provides reliable information on responsiveness to adjuvant hormonal therapy which is very effective in patients selected on the basis of ER assay.     

Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status

BACKGROUND: The biological basis for the superior efficacy of neoadjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive locally advanced breast cancer was investigated by analyzing tumor proliferation and expression of estrogen-regulated genes before and after the initiation of therapy. METHODS: Tumor samples were obtained at baseline and at the end of treatment from 185 patients participating in a double blind randomized Phase III study of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. These paired specimens were simultaneously analyzed for Ki67, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), trefoil factor 1 (PS2), HER1 (epidermal growth factor receptor), and HER2 (ErbB2 or neu) by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The treatment-induced reduction in geometric mean Ki67 was significantly greater with letrozole (87%) than tamoxifen (75%; analysis of covariance P = 0.0009). Differences in the average Ki67 reduction were particularly marked for ER-positive tumors that overexpressed HER1 and/or HER2 (88 versus 45%, respectively; P = 0.0018). Twenty-three of 92 tumors (25%) on tamoxifen and 14 of 93 on letrozole (15%) showed a paradoxical increase in Ki67 with treatment, and the majority of these cases was HER1/2 negative. Letrozole, but not tamoxifen, significantly reduced expression of the estrogen-regulated proteins PgR and trefoil factor 1, regardless of HER1/2 status (P < 0.0001). ER down-regulation occurred with both agents, although levels decreased more with tamoxifen (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Letrozole inhibited tumor proliferation to a greater extent than tamoxifen. The molecular basis for this advantage appears complex but includes possible tamoxifen agonist effects on the cell cycle in both HER1/2+ and HER1/2- tumors. A pattern of continued proliferation despite appropriate down-regulation of PgR expression with estrogen deprivation or tamoxifen was also documented. This observation suggests the estrogenic regulation of proliferation and PgR expression may be dissociated in endocrine therapy resistant cells.     

Estrogen receptor splice variants as a potential source of false-positive estrogen receptor status in breast cancer diagnostics

It is well established that only estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors benefit from hormonal therapies. We hypothesized that a subgroup of breast cancer patients expresses estrogen receptor α (ERα), but fails to respond to hormonal therapy due to the expression of a non-functional receptor. We analyzed a series of 2,658 ERα-positive HER2-negative breast tumors for ERα and progesterone receptor (PR) status as determined by mRNA expression and for their molecular subtypes (Luminal type vs Basal type, assessed by BluePrint? molecular subtyping assay). In addition, we assessed the recurrence risk (low vs high) using the 70-gene MammaPrint? signature. We found that 55 out of 2,658 (2.1 %) tumors that are ERα positive by mRNA analysis also demonstrate a Basal molecular subtype, indicating that they lack expression of estrogen-responsive genes. These ERα-positive Basal-type tumors express significantly lower levels of both ERα and PR mRNA as compared to Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001) and almost invariably (94.5 %) have a high-risk MammaPrint? profile. Twelve of the MammaPrint? genes are directly ERα responsive, indicating that MammaPrint? assesses ERα function in breast cancer without considering ERα mRNA levels. We find a relatively high expression of the dominant negative ERα splice variant ERΔ7 in ERα-positive Basal-type tumors as compared to ERα-positive Luminal-type tumors (P < 0.0001). Expression of the dominant negative ERα variant ERΔ7 provides a rationale as to why tumors are of the Basal molecular subtype while staining ERα positive by immunohistochemistry. These tumors may lack a functional response to estrogen and consequently may not respond to hormonal therapy. Our data indicate that such patients are of MammaPrint? high recurrence risk and might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by ligand-binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno-histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study

Results of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) ligand-binding assays (LBAs) are strongly correlated with ER and PgR by immuno-histochemistry (IHC). To investigate whether ER and PgR by IHC are also strongly correlated with tamoxifen response, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS), the results of the 2 methods were directly compared in 205 patients with ER(+) metastatic breast cancer treated with daily tamoxifen (Southwest Oncology Group protocol 8228) with 9 years median follow-up. pS2, another estrogen-regulated molecule, was also analyzed. Tumors were scored for IHC from 0 to 5, according to the proportion of positively stained cells. These IHC scores for both ER and PgR were significantly associated with LBA levels (p < 0.001). There was a significant direct relationship between higher IHC ER, PgR and pS2 and increasing response to tamoxifen. TTF and OS were also significantly longer for patients with higher ER or PgR, but not pS2, IHC scores. Low, intermediate and high ER or PgR categories showed similar differences in response rates whether defined by LBA or IHC. In logistic regression models which included ER, PgR and pS2 by IHC; ER and PgR by LBA; and menopausal status, only ER (IHC) and pS2 (IHC) retained significance for predicting tamoxifen response (p = 0. 02 and p = 0.005, respectively), along with menopausal status (for PgR by IHC, p = 0.09). Increasing ER and PgR by IHC, as by LBA, are thus significantly associated with a progressively better response and longer survival in ER(+) metastatic breast cancer. pS2 is also predictive in this setting.     

Tumor-proliferative activity, progesterone receptor status, estrogen receptor level, and clinical outcome of estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

The relations among pretreatment tumor-proliferative activity, progesterone receptor (PgR) status, estrogen receptor (ER) level, and clinical outcome were analyzed in a series of 45 ER-positive advanced breast cancer postmenopausal women treated with tamoxifen (20 mg/day) until disease progression. Tritiated thymidine ([3H]dThd) Labeling Index (LI) by autoradiographic assay was utilized for proliferative activity analysis, whereas the dextran-coated charcoal method was used for ER and PgR evaluation (cutoff value, 10 fmol/mg of protein cytosol). The median [3H]dThd LI value was 1.8%; 73% of cases were PgR positive, and 53% were highly ER positive (greater than 100 fmol/mg of protein cytosol). Clinical responses were more frequently observed in slowly than in quickly proliferating tumors (86% versus 60%; P less than 0.05) but were similar for PgR-positive and -negative cases, as well as for those with high and low ER positivity. Only [3H]dThd LI was found to individualize patients with different survival rates (at 40 mo of follow-up, 78% versus 40% in slowly and quickly proliferating tumors, respectively). The [3H]dThd LI, monitored in ten patients by a second tumor biopsy after 14 days of tamoxifen therapy, was found to have a significantly lower median value (P = 0.03). These data indicate that pretreatment [3H]dThd LI provides information, which is not available in a study of PgR and ER status, on the clinical outcome of ER-positive advanced breast cancer patients treated by hormone therapy.