Cardiovascular response of a continuous variable rate alfentanil infusion for abdominal aortic surgery

A prospective study was undertaken to determine the cardiovascular response of a continuous alfentanil infusion during abdominal aortic surgery (AAS). Each subject (n = 20) received a beta-blocking drug preoperatively, and was premedicated with oral lorazepam. Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 50 micrograms.kg-1 and thiopentone 3 mg.kg-1, and was maintained with a variable rate infusion of alfentanil and 66 per cent nitrous oxide in oxygen. During the infusion, boluses of alfentanil, 7.5 micrograms.kg-1, were administered to maintain heart rate and blood pressure within 20 per cent of awake baseline values. Haemodynamic stability during surgery was achieved with infusion rates varying between 0.5 and 2.5 micrograms.kg-1, which resulted in mean alfentanil serum concentrations ranging from 186 +/- 53 to 315 +/- 98 ng.ml-1. The mean cumulative alfentanil dose was 15.4 +/- 6.2 mg.patient-1 for surgery which lasted an average of 141 +/- 41 min. Throughout surgery, no patient required inhalational anaesthetic agents or vasoactive drugs. Fifteen of the 20 patients had perioperative Holter monitoring. No myocardial ischaemia was detected during the intraoperative period. However, there was a 33 per cent incidence of myocardial ischaemia on the first postoperative day. There were no myocardial infarcts and no deaths. We conclude that in beta-blocked patients undergoing aortic reconstructive surgery, a variable rate alfentanil infusion administered with 66 per cent nitrous oxide provides anaesthesia characterized by good haemodynamic control without the need for supplemental agents or vasoactive drugs.     

Atracurium infusion in total intravenous anesthesia

The neuromuscular blocking effect of atracurium given as a bolus dose (0.5 mg X kg-1) followed by a maintenance infusion was studied during two different anesthetic techniques. It has been reported that benzodiazepines interact with non-depolarising neuromuscular blockers. In this study no difference was found in the effect of atracurium given with conventional fentanyl/nitrous oxide anesthesia when compared to total intravenous anesthesia using midazolam/alfentanil. More than 90% twitch depression was achieved after 123 and 137 s, respectively. Recovery time to 10% twitch height following the bolus dose was around 32 min. The dosage range for atracurium given by infusion (0.29-0.44 mg X kg-1 X h-1) was confirmed.     

Evaluation of the electroencephalographic bispectral index during fentanyl-midazolam anaesthesia for cardiac surgery. Does it predict haemodynamic responses during endotracheal intubation and sternotomy?

The bispectral index, a value derived from the electroencephalogram, has been proposed as a measure of anaesthetic effect. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bispectral index during midazolam-fentanyl anaesthesia for cardiac surgery for its possible role as a predictor of increases in systolic blood pressure during endotracheal intubation and sternotomy. After institutional approval 15 consenting patients, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, were selected for the study. Anaesthesia was induced in all patients with a loading dose of fentanyl 7.5-10 micrograms kg-1, midazolam 0.15 mg kg-1 and pancuronium 0.1 mg kg-1. After a further bolus dose of fentanyl 10-12.5 micrograms kg-1 prior to the start of incision and sternotomy, maintenance infusion rates of fentanyl 4-6 micrograms kg-1 h-1 and midazolam 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1 were started and continued through surgery at the discretion of the anaesthetist and guided by the presenting clinical and haemodynamic responses. The control of anaesthesia was never based on the value of the bispectral index. The mean bispectral index value decreased from 95.7 (3.1) at base-line to 59.5 (12.0) after induction of anaesthesia and then remained below 70 throughout surgery. However, there was an important interindividual variability in bispectral index values despite standardized dosages of fentanyl and midazolam. There was no significant correlation between the bispectral index values in the pre-intubation and pre-incision period and the changes in systolic blood pressure during endotracheal intubation and sternotomy, respectively. In conclusion, the large intersubject variability in the bispectral index values should be investigated further in the light of the great variability in the clinical effects of midazolam and fentanyl. The lack of significant correlation between the bispectral index values and the haemodynamic responses suggest that the bispectral index, which is a helpful monitor of anaesthetic depth, is not a very reliable monitor of global anaesthetic adequacy during total intravenous anaesthesia with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl in cardiac surgical patients.     

Alfentanil v. isoflurane for outpatient arthroscopy

Alfentanil by continuous intravenous infusion and isoflurane have been compared as anaesthetic agents for outpatient arthroscopy. In 42 patients, divided at random into two groups, anaesthesia was induced with methohexitone and vecuronium bromide, and, after intubation, maintained with nitrous oxide 66% in oxygen combined with alfentanil or isoflurane. Alfentanil was given before intubation (1 mg), as a loading dose before starting surgery (50 micrograms kg-1) and by a continuous infusion at a rate of 1 microgram kg-1 min-1. Isoflurane was given in a concentration of 0.9% as a maintenance dose. Awakening from anaesthesia was more rapid with alfentanil than with isoflurane. Recovery tests were applied in the recovery room. Both anaesthetic techniques provided satisfactory anaesthesia and rapid recovery. All patients but one were content with the anaesthesia. The patients who received isoflurane scored better in the recovery tests in the first 3 h, but after 3 h there was no difference between the groups. The alfentanil group showed a higher incidence of nausea and/or vomiting: 45% compared to 14% in the isoflurane group.     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil protects against postoperative nausea and vomiting

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and requirements for anti-emetic medication were assessed in 80 female patients undergoing day-case anaesthesia during assisted conception therapy. Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 50 micrograms.kg-1 and propofol 1 mg.kg-1; atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 was given to facilitate tracheal intubation. The patients were allocated to receive either total intravenous maintenance of anaesthesia with an infusion of propofol and increments of alfentanil (Group P) or inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia with nitrous oxide and enflurane (Group E). Postoperative nausea, retching, vomiting, requirements for anti-emetic therapy, and unplanned admission for overnight stay in hospital were recorded. Overall incidence of nausea was 64% in group E and 39% in Group P (P less than 0.05). Incidence of vomiting was 67% in Group E and 34% in Group P (P less than 0.05). Metoclopramide was requested by 62% of patients in Group E, and 32% of those in Group P (P less than 0.05); 21% of the patients in Group E were admitted to hospital overnight, while only 5% of the patients in Group P required unscheduled admission to hospital (P less than 0.05). We conclude that total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil is superior to inhalational maintenance with nitrous oxide and enflurane in that it is associated with less nausea and vomiting, less requirement for anti-emetic medication, and a lower probability of unplanned admission to hospital after day-care gynaecological surgery.     

Flumazenil and peroperative awakening in surgery of scoliosis

Motor and sensory function must be assessed during surgery of scoliosis so as to avoid possible damage to the spinal cord. The intraoperative awakening by a specific benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, was studied prospectively in 20 patients (mean age 17 years) undergoing surgery for severe scoliosis. Premedication consisted in 0.02 mg.kg-1 atropine and 0.15 mg.kg-1 midazolam. Anaesthesia was induced with a mean dose of 0.42 +/- 0.1 mg.kg-1 midazolam, 1.6 +/- 0.6 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl and 0.1 mg.kg-1 pancuronium. Maintenance was obtained with a continuous infusion of 0.22 +/- 0.1 mg.kg-1.h-1 midazolam, 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen, and fentanyl (1.6 +/- 0.5 micrograms.kg-1.h-1). Nitrous oxide and midazolam were respectively stopped 10 and 1 min before giving the antagonist (5 micrograms.kg-1 flumazenil) if required (17 out of the 20 patients). Eye opening occurred a mean 42 +/- 32 s after giving the antagonist. At this time, there was a significant increase in mean arterial blood pressure (+ 11 mmHg) and heart rate (+ 7 b.min-1). Thiopentone, 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and 0.5% halothane were given to re-induce and maintain anaesthesia for completion of the procedure. The day following surgery, 19 patients were unable to remember the period of intraoperative awakening. One patient, although remembering the episode, did not experience any pain or any other disagreement in relation to it. Two patients were given a second dose of flumazenil at extubation so as to improve the quality of their recovery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol,alfentanil, and oxygen-air: three different dosage schemes

Three different dosage schemes of propofol infusions combined with a fixed-rate alfentanil infusion were investigated in total intravenous anaesthesia. In 30 premedicated patients, divided at random into three groups, anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg.kg-1 immediately followed by an alfentanil infusion 10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 as a loading dose which was decreased after ten minutes to a maintenance dose of 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg.kg-1 was used as the muscle relaxant. After induction of anaesthesia a propofol infusion 2 mg.kg-1.hr-1 was started in group A, 3 mg.kg-1.hr-1 in group B and 4 mg.kg-1 hr-1 in group C. At signs of light anaesthesia supplementary bolus doses of 20 mg propofol and 1 mg alfentanil were given. The patients' lungs were ventilated with air-oxygen (FIO2 0.35). The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures showed no statistical significant differences between the three groups. A significant (P less than 0.01) decrease of the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures was present after induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Recovery was uneventful in all but one patient, who had ventilatory depression that responded to naloxone (0.2 mg IV). Awareness did not occur in any patient. The only difference between the three groups was the higher number of supplementary bolus doses of propofol and alfentanil needed in group A (P less than 0.01). In total intravenous anaesthesia propofol 3 and 4 mg.kg-1.hr-1 as a maintenance dose combined with a two-step fixed-rate alfentanil infusion provided smooth anaesthesia and uneventful rapid recovery.     

Effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide and midazolam on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during sufentanil anaesthesia for major spinal surgery

Recording of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) enables monitoring of spinal cord function. We studied the effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide or midazolam during sufentanil anaesthesia on CSEP monitoring during major spinal surgery. Thirty patients with normal preoperative CSEP were allocated randomly to one of the following anaesthesia regimens: propofol (2.5 mg kg-1 followed by 10-6 mg kg-1 h-1) with or without nitrous oxide, or midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1 followed by 0.15 mg kg-1 h-1) combined with sufentanil 0.5 microgram kg- 1 h-1 in the propofol and midazolam groups, or 0.25 microgram kg-1 h-1 in the propofol-nitrous oxide group. CSEP were elicited by alternate right and left tibial posterior nerve stimulation and recorded before and after induction (15 min, 1, 2 and 3 h), and during skin closure. CSEP latencies were not significantly modified in the three groups. CSEP amplitude decreased significantly in the propofol-nitrous oxide group (from mean 2.0 (SEM 0.3) to 0.6 (0.1) microV; P < 0.05) but not in the propofol (from 1.8 (0.6) to 2.2 (0.3) microV) or midazolam (1.7 (0.5) to 1.6 (0.5) microV) groups. The time to the first postoperative voluntary motor response (recovery) delay was significantly greater in the midazolam group (115 (19) min) compared with the propofol and propofol-nitrous oxide groups (43 (8) and 41 (3) min, respectively). Consequently, the use of propofol without nitrous oxide can be recommended during spinal surgery when CSEP monitoring is required.      

Atracurium infusions in major ophthalmic surgery

Fifteen patients who were undergoing major ophthalmic surgery were anaesthetized using controlled ventilation with nitrous oxide, oxygen, midazolam and fentanyl after induction with thiopentone. Each was then given a bolus dose of 0.6 mg kg-1 atracurium followed immediately by an infusion of the drug at the rate of 0.6 mg kg-1 h-1, neuromuscular function being monitored throughout. Even slight movement can jeopardize the success of this type of surgery but good control of neuromuscular blockade was achieved without inhalational supplementation. The mean duration of the atracurium infusion was 118 min (range 30-247 min). The mean time from stopping the infusion to recovery of the first twitch of the train of four (TOF) to 20% was 25 min (range 11-44 min). Atropine (1.2 mg) and 5.0 mg neostigmine were then given in divided doses and a rapid and complete recovery was achieved. This technique can be used safely even in bad-risk patients but the infusion should be discontinued about 25 min before the end of surgery.     

Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery

We propose the use of an intravenous propofol/propofol auto-co-induction technique as an alternative to propofol/midazolam for induction of anaesthesia. We have studied 54 unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients undergoing day-stay anaesthesia for minor orthopaedic surgery. All received 10 micrograms.kg-1 or alfentanil before induction, followed by either midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, propofol 0.4 mg.kg-1 or saline, and 2 min later, a propofol infusion at a rate of 50 mg.kg-1.h-1 until loss of eyelash reflex. We compared pre- and postinduction haemodynamic changes, complications at insertion of a laryngeal mask airway and recovery from anaesthesia in the three groups. Both co-induction techniques showed less postinduction hypotension and significant reduction of the total induction dose of propofol when compared to the control group. In the propofol/propofol group there was a decreased incidence of apnoea during induction of anaesthesia. These patients were discharged from hospital 2 h after the end of anaesthesia whereas patients in the midazolam/propofol group were discharged after 2 1/2 h (p < 0.001).     

Effect of intravenous hypnotics on the actions of pipecuronium.

Seventy-five ASA Grades I-III patients (18-85 years, 45-90 kg) were randomized into five groups. All patients received N2O/O2 (2/1) and alfentanil: loading dose (LD) 0.015 mg kg-1 and maintenance dose (MD) 0.045 mg kg-1 h-1 (groups 1-4). Group 1 received propofol (LD 2 mg kg-1 and MD 6 mg kg-1 h-1); Group 2 etomidate (LD 0.3 mg kg-1 and MD 0.6 mg kg-1 h-1); Group 3 midazolam (LD 0.2 mg kg-1 and MD 0.120 mg kg-1 h-1); Group 4 methohexitone (LD 1.5 mg kg-1 and MD 4 mg kg-1 h-1); Group 5 dehydrobenzperidol 0.05-0.23 mg kg-1 and alfentanil (LD 0.100 mg kg-1 and MD 0.060 mg kg-1 h-1). The neuromuscular block induced by pipecuronium (50 micrograms kg-1) was evaluated. No statistically significant differences were found between the five groups as concerned degree of block (expressed as % twitch amplitude in response to the first of the TOF stimuli (Ta1) at intubation, T1 minimum and recovery to Ta1 = 20%, 25% and 75%. Slightly faster intubation was possible when midazolam was used in comparison with propofol, methohexitone or NLA and when etomidate was used in comparison with propofol. A wide range of individual values of maximal neuromuscular blocking activity was found.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfentanil infusions during general anesthesia

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of alfentanil were studied in 64 surgical patients. Alfentanil was administered as a loading infusion (25-130 micrograms/kg) followed by a maintenance infusion (0.25-1.3 micrograms X kg-1 X min-1) as part of a nitrous oxide-narcotic-muscle relaxant technique. Although alfentanil doses of at least 50 micrograms/kg (in combination with thiopental, 2 mg/kg) were required to prevent hemodynamic changes during intubation, apnea or chest wall rigidity frequently occurred with alfentanil loading infusions exceeding 75 micrograms/kg. The alfentanil clearance rate was significantly lower in patients with liver dysfunction (2.3 +/- 1.3 vs 4.2 +/- 2.0 ml X kg-1 X min-1, mean +/- SD). In addition, the patients who required opioid antagonists to reverse postoperative respiratory depression had lower clearance rates (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs 4.1 +/- 1.9 ml X kg-1 X min-1) and longer elimination half-life values (406 +/- 304 vs 87 +/- 53 min). For maintenance of hemodynamic stability during superficial and intraabdominal operations, alfentanil serum concentration-response curves revealed ED95 values exceeding 300 ng/ml and 400 ng/ml, respectively. Our study also demonstrated a wide range of clinical responses to fixed doses of alfentanil. At equivalent doses, some patients required supplemental anesthetics, whereas others required an opioid antagonist. Careful titration of the alfentanil maintenance infusion is recommended to minimize the possibility of postoperative respiratory depression.     

Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and alfentanil in outpatient general anesthesia: A study with concomitant thiopentone, flumazenil or placebo administration

The pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, midazolam and thiopentone used for induction of short general anaesthesia were studied in 55 gynaecological outpatients. All the patients received midazolam as premedication. The patients received intravenous anaesthesia with alfentanil and either thiopentone or midazolam, supplemented with either nitrous oxide or air in oxygen ventilation, reversed by the end of anaesthesia with either placebo or flumazenil. Blood sampling for serum concentration measurements of midazolam, alfentanil and thiopentone was performed regularly for 7 h. The following mean pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± –s.e.mean) were calculated for midazolam and alfentanil, respectively: elimination half–life 3.9 ± 0.3 h and 1.2 ± 0.05 h, apparent volume of distribution 107 ± 6 1 and 31 ± 1.5 1, total body clearance 20 ± 0.7 1/h and 18 ± 0.8 1/h. No influence of flumazenil on the kinetics of midazolam and no influence of thiopentone, midazolam, flumazenil or nitrous oxide on the kinetics of alfentanil was found. The serum levels of thiopentone were below the detection limit of the assay after 60 min, which made an evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters impossible. Significant positive correlations were found in the individual patient between midazolam and alfentanil for all pharmacokinetic variables evaluated. For midazolam, an increase in the elimination half–life and the apparent volume of distribution was positively correlated to an increase of body–weight. For alfentanil, a decrease in the total body clearance and an increase in the elimination half–life were positively correlated to an increase of age. A prolonged elimination half–life of alfentanil was positively correlated to use of alcohol. High serum levels of thiopentone were positively correlated to increasing age of the patients.     

Comparison of propanidid with propofol for dental surgery of short or medium duration

The properties of propofol in emulsion given by continuous intravenous infusion to spontaneously breathing patients have been well studied. Thirty randomized voluntary premedicated patients undergoing dental extraction were anaesthetized with propofol (2.5 mg X kg-1 IVD, and 9 mg X kg-1 X h-1) or with propanidid (9 mg X kg-1 IVD, and 60 mg X kg-1 X h-1), supplemented with nitrous oxide in oxygen and fentanyl. Induction, maintenance and recovery times had the same characteristics. Highly significant differences occurred between the two groups regarding the increase in heart rate, apnoea and recovery time. This study showed that propofol was an eminently suitable agent for continuous intravenous anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing patients for dental surgery.     

Comparison of midazolam and propofol in combination with alfentanil for total intravenous anesthesia

Hemodynamic function during induction of anesthesia, the alfentanil and naloxone requirements, and the speed of recovery from total intravenous anesthesia with alfentanil/midazolam (group M, n = 10) or alfentanil/propofol (group P, n = 10) were compared in patients undergoing lower limb surgery. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 mg/kg propofol in 5 min followed by 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 for 30 min and 4.5 mg.kg-1.h-1 until skin closure, or 0.42 mg/kg midazolam in 5 min followed by 0.125 mg.kg-1.h-1 until skin closure. Simultaneously, a variable-rate infusion of alfentanil was given. Patients were ventilated with 30% oxygen in air. In both groups blood pressure and heart rate decreased significantly (P less than 0.02) and to a similar extent during induction. The total dose of alfentanil was similar in both groups. No patient in group P and nine patients in group M needed naloxone (average dose 130 +/- 70 micrograms, P less than 0.001). Recovery, as judged by psychomotor tests (90% score was reached at 1 h in the P group and at about 4 h in the M group, P less than 0.001), sedative scores, and orientation in time and place, was shorter in group P than in group M. The conclusion is reached that propofol is superior to midazolam in total intravenous anesthesia with alfentanil.     

Comparative effects of thiopentone and propofol on respiratory resistance after tracheal intubation

To compare the effects of propofol and thiopentone on tracheal intubation-induced bronchoconstriction, 37 patients were allocated randomly to anaesthesia with either thiopentone 4 mg kg-1 followed by a 15-mg kg-1 h-1 continuous infusion or propofol 3 mg kg-1 followed by a 9-mg kg-1 h-1 continuous infusion. Intubation was facilitated by vecuronium 0.1-0.2 mg kg-1. Respiratory system resistance (Rrs) was measured by a CP-100 pulmonary function monitor, 5 min after intubation. The 5-min post-intubation Rrs values were significantly lower in the propofol group (8.5 (SD 1.5) cm H2O litre-1 S-1) than in the thiopentone group (10.9 (3.2) cm H2O litre-1 S-1). Thirty minutes after commencing isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia, Rrs declined by 17.5 (SEM 3.6)% from baseline in the thiopentone group, but by only 1.6 (2.6)% in the propofol group. We conclude that the dose of propofol administered provided more protection against tracheal intubation- induced bronchoconstriction than an induction dose of thiopentone.      

Maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol--a comparative study of a stepdown infusion of propofol and a low dose infusion supplemented by incremental doses.

Forty-four patients, ASA Grade I or II, had anaesthesia induced with propofol at 100 mg min-1 followed by a maintenance rate of 6 mg kg-1 h-1 or a stepdown regimen of 10 mg kg-1 h-1 for 10 min, 8 mg kg-1 h-1 for the next 10 min and at 6 mg kg-1 h-1 thereafter. Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol infused using an Ohmeda 9000 pump supplemented by nitrous oxide and oxygen (2:1) in a Bain circuit with spontaneous ventilation. Incremental doses of 20 mg of propofol were given to both groups as clinically indicated to maintain anaesthesia. Both methods provided satisfactory maintenance of anaesthesia but significantly more incremental doses were required in the group receiving the steady rate infusion. However, a lower cumulative dose was required up to 30 min in this group but not by 40 min. A comparable fall in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate was seen in both groups. There was no difference in the recovery times between the groups and the total dose did not correlate with time to recovery.     

Effect of peroperative analgesia on immediate postoperative oxygen consumption

Oxygen consumption in the immediate postoperative period was assessed in a series of twelve patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery, randomly assigned to two groups (n = 6 for each). The anaesthetic protocol was the same in all patients: premedication with flunitrazepam 30 micrograms.kg-1, induction with flunitrazepam 20 micrograms.kg-1, fentanyl 5 micrograms.kg-1, thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1, pancuronium bromide 80 micrograms.kg-1, and maintenance during the first three hours with flunitrazepam 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 and pancuronium 0.03 micrograms.kg-1.h-1. All the patients were given a continuous infusion of fentanyl during the whole length of the surgery: in Group I (GI), 3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 and in Group II (GII), 1 microgram.kg-1.h-1. The patients in Group II were also given enflurane 1.2 +/- 0.3 vol %. During the immediate postoperative period, the parameters studied were measured by means of an Engstr?m Metabolism Calculator at the 15th, 30th, 45th, 60th, 120th and 240th minutes, and at the time of extubation. In GII, postoperative heart rate and lactic acid levels were higher than in GI (p less than 0.05). Both groups had oxygen consumption values greater than theoretical resting levels. However, postoperative oxygen consumption was greatly increased in GII with respect to GI during the first 4 hours (p less than 0.01). The respiratory quotient was greater in GI than in GII at the end of the study (p less than 0.05). These data indicate that the intraoperative analgesic technique influences postoperative oxygen consumption. A dose of fentanyl of 3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 is more efficient than one of 1 microgram.kg-1.h-1 associated with enflurane.     

Comparison of Alfentanil and Fentanyl as Supplements to Induction of Anaesthesia with Thiopentone

In 120 premedicated patients undergoing general surgery, anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 3 mg kg-1, preceded by alfentanil 4.5, 9.0 or 13.5 micrograms kg-1 or fentanyl 1.5 micrograms kg-1. The largest alfentanil dose attenuated the arterial blood pressure response to laryngoscopy and intubation better than the smaller doses of alfentanil. Changes in frontal muscle electromyogram or plasma cortisol and prolactin levels were not dependent on the adjuvant used. After thiopentone, 30, 7 and 17% of the patients given alfentanil 9.0 and 13.5 micrograms kg-1 and fentanyl 1.5 micrograms kg-1, respectively, reacted to pinching of the lower abdomen. Patients given alfentanil 4.5 micrograms kg-1 did not tolerate the endotracheal tube after recovery from suxamethonium block and their heart rate was increased 12 min after alfentanil administration. We conclude that the antinociceptive effect of alfentanil is distinctly shorter than that of fentanyl. The analgesic potency of alfentanil is between one sixth and one ninth of that of fentanyl.     

Remifentanil vs alfentanil in the total intravenous anaesthesia for paediatric abdominal surgery

BACKGROUNDS: Our aim was to investigate whether total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and alfentanil would ensure appropriate analgesia and recovery conditions in anaesthesia for children undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: Sixty children, scheduled for abdominal operations were randomized to receive, in a double-blind manner, either remifentanil (loading dose 1 microg x kg(-1); maintenance infusion, 0.25 microg x kg(-1) min(-1)) or alfentanil (loading dose 50 microg x kg(-1); maintenance infusion, 1 microg x kg(-1) min(-1)) as the analgesic component of TIVA. They were combined with propofol (loading dose, 2 mg x kg(-1); step 1 maintenance infusion, 10 mg x kg(-1) h(-1); step 2 maintenance infusion, 8 mg x kg(-1) h(-1); step 3 maintenance infusion, 6 mg x kg(-1) h(-1)) neuromuscular blockade was with mivacurium. Dose changes of the drugs, the times from cessation of anaesthesia to extubation, verbal responses, recovery of ventilation, orientation, and qualification for discharge from the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU) were recorded. RESULTS: Demographics, duration of surgery and anaesthesia were similar between the two groups. Times to extubation and stay in the PACU were significantly shorter in the remifentanil group compared with the alfentanil group. Quality of emergence (QE) from anaesthesia scale scores were higher in the remifentanil group compared with the alfentanil group. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil provides a more rapid recovery and adequate postoperative analgesia after TIVA for paediatric abdominal surgery, compared with alfentanil.