Renal transplantation: can we reduce calcineurin inhibitor/stop steroids? Evidence based on protocol biopsy findings

How to combine antirejection drugs and which is the optimal dose of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors beyond the first year after kidney transplantation to maintain adequate immunosuppression without major side effects are far from clear. Kidney transplant patients on steroid, cyclosporine (CsA), and azathioprine were randomized to per-protocol biopsy (n = 30) or no-biopsy (n = 29) 1 to 2 yr posttransplant. Steroid or CsA were discontinued or reduced on the basis of biopsy to establish effects on drug-related complications, acute rejection, and graft function over 3 yr of follow-up. Serum creatinine, GFR (plasma clearance of iohexol), RPF (renal clearance of p-aminohippurate), CsA pharmacokinetics, and adverse events were monitored yearly. At the end, patients underwent a second biopsy. Per-protocol biopsy histology revealed no lesions (n = 5, steroid withdrawal), CsA nephropathy (n = 13, CsA discontinuation/reduction), or chronic rejection (n = 12, standard therapy). Reducing the drug regimen led to overall fewer side effects related to immunosuppression as compared with standard therapy or no-biopsy. Steroids were safely stopped with no acute rejection or graft loss. Complete CsA discontinuation was associated with acute rejection in the first four patients. Lowering CsA to low target CsA trough (30 to 70 ng/ml) never led to acute rejection or major renal function deterioration. Biopsy patients on conventional regimen had no acute rejection, one graft loss, no significant change in GFR, and significant RPF decline. No-biopsy controls: no acute rejection, one graft loss, significant decline of GFR and RPF. By serial biopsy analysis, severe lesions did not develop in patients with steroid discontinuation in contrast to patients on standard therapy over follow-up. CsA reduction did not adversely affect histology. Per-protocol biopsy more than 1 yr after kidney transplantation is a safe procedure to guide change of drug regimen and to lower the risk of major side effects.     

A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-CD25 mAb provides effective immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation is a significant risk factor for early acute rejection and graft loss. Sirolimus (SRL) can be administered in the setting of DGF without exacerbating the impaired renal function after transplantation. We examined a calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL during the early post-operative period in renal transplant patients with delayed or impaired graft function. A retrospective review of 14 consecutive kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function who received SRL was performed. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of daclizumab induction (2 mg/kg), SRL (5-15 mg load followed by 2 5 mg daily maintenance therapy), corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1.5-3 g/d). Patients were monitored for allograft function, acute rejection, graft survival, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Serum levels of SRL were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography performed at an independent commercial laboratory. Donors were cadaveric in 13 cases and living related in one. The duration of follow-up was 0.5-5.2 months. Nine patients required hemodialysis after transplantation. The mean time to initiation of calcineurin inhibitors was 21 +/- 13 d. Average serum creatinine levels at the initiation of SRL and at 1 month after transplantation were 8.4 +/- 2.7 and 2.1 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, respectively. There were 2 patients (14%) who experienced acute rejection within the first month after transplantation -1 with type I (steroid therapy) and 1 with type II (anti-thymocyte therapy). Serum levels of SRL were initially undetectable in the 2 patients with acute rejection. No grafts were lost during the period of follow-up. Three patients developed thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 x 10(9)) and no patients developed leukopenia. The combination of SRL with anti-CD25 mAb, MMF, and corticosteroids appears to provide effective non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression for kidney transplantation without the need for a lymphocyte-depleting regimen. However, it is important to monitor serum SRL levels to determine the optimal dosing regimen. Furthermore, long-term follow-up of these patients will be helpful to determine whether improved immunosuppression can be achieved with a fully calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL.     

Late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal as a strategy to prevent graft loss in patients with suboptimal kidney transplant function

Chronic allograft nephropathy is a major cause of progressive renal failure in renal transplant recipients. Its etiology is multifactorial and may include both immunologic and nonimmunologic causes. In this observational cohort study we set out to see if calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal would reduce the likelihood of graft loss. METHODS: One hundred and five renal transplant recipients with impaired kidney function (mean serum creatinine 3.0 +/- 0.1 mg/dl) and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy had the dose of their calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine (CSA), or tacrolimus (FK), reduced or discontinued with either the addition of, or continuation of mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose corticosteroids. This intervention occurred at a mean of 29.0 +/- 2.7 months after transplantation. Follow-up after intervention was 54.3 +/- 4.1 months in the reduced CSA group (n = 64), 41.6 +/- 3.2 months in the reduced FK group (n = 28), and 75.5 +/- 6.7 months in the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group (n = 13). RESULTS: There were 24 graft failures in the reduced CSA group, 9 graft failures in the reduced FK group, and 1 graft lost in the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group. The unadjusted relative risk for graft failure in the CSA and FK groups combined (confidence interval 1.05-31.6), was 4.07 using the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group as the reference, p = 0.05. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for baseline covariates including age, gender, race, type of transplant, delayed graft function, baseline blood pressure and random serum glucose and cholesterol demonstrated that only calcineurin inhibitor dose reduction but not withdrawal, older age, delayed graft function, higher serum creatinine at the time of intervention, and higher diastolic blood pressure and serum glucose, correlated with graft loss. Only 6 of the 105 patients developed Banff grade acute rejection. All responded to steroid therapy. We conclude that although this observational cohort study may have a selection bias, late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy and impaired kidney function appears safe and durable as a treatment strategy to reduce the likelihood of graft failure.     

Experience With the Use of Sirolimus in Liver Transplantation—Use in Patients for Whom Calcineurin Inhibitors Are Contraindicated

Sirolimus (SRL) provides effective immunosuppression for kidney transplantation and may be useful in patients with delayed allograft function after kidney transplantation. We review our experience with SRL in liver transplant recipients for whom calcineurin inhibitors are undesirable. Fourteen patients with renal insufficiency or acute mental status impairment were administered SRL after liver transplantation (5- to 10-mg load, 1 to 4 mg/d). Immunosuppression also consisted of mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. On resolution of neurological or renal dysfunction (return to baseline mental status or serum creatinine level), tacrolimus (TAC) therapy was initiated. Twelve patients received primary transplants, 1 patient received a combined liver-kidney transplant, and 1 patient received a third transplant. Follow-up was 2 to 7 months. Calcineurin inhibitors were initially withheld in 9 patients, and therapy was aborted because of toxicity in the remaining 5 patients. Mean times to the initiation of SRL and TAC therapy were 5.4 ± 4.6 and 26.8 ± 24.4 days, respectively. Serum trough levels of SRL did not correlate with dose or other patient variables. Two patients died after prolonged pretransplantation hospital courses in the intensive care unit. Six patients experienced acute rejection, but only 1 patient required antilymphocyte therapy. Serum creatinine levels at the start of SRL therapy were 2.2 ± 1.1 and 1.2 ± 0.6 mg/dL at 3 months. All 3 patients with neurological indications for SRL had a return to their baseline mental status. All patients had improved liver function chemistry test results and prothrombin times. No patients developed leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. SRL is safe after liver transplantation in patients with acute neurological or renal impairment. SRL is an attractive alternative when calcineurin inhibitors are undesirable, but serum trough levels of SRL should be monitored. A prospective randomized study of an SRL-based calcineurin inhibitor–avoiding regimen compared with standard therapy in patients with renal insufficiency will further evaluate the role for SRL in liver transplantation. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:734-740.)     

Addition of isradipine (Lomir) results in a better renal function after kidney transplantation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center study

BACKGROUND: After successful kidney transplantation patients may suffer from the adverse effects due to the use of calcineurin inhibitors. Calcium channel blockers are effective in the treatment of hypertension and may ameliorate cyclosporine- (CsA) induced impairment of renal function after kidney transplantation. Calcium channel blockers may also modulate the immune-system which may result in reduction of acute rejection episodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1995 till 1997 the effect of isradipine (Lomir) on renal function, incidence and severity of delayed graft function (DGF), and acute rejection after kidney transplantation, was studied in 210 renal transplant recipients, who were randomized to receive isradipine (n=98) or placebo (n=112) after renal transplantation in a double-blind fashion. RESULTS: In the isradipine group renal function was significantly better at 3 and 12 months (P=0.002 and P=0.021) compared with the placebo group. DGF was present in both groups: isradipine: (28+6)/98 (35%); placebo: (35+9)/112 (40%), P=0.57. Severity of DGF was comparable in both groups (isradipine: 9.1+/-8.7 vs. placebo: 9.3+/-8.1 days). No statistical difference was found in incidence or severity of biopsy-proven acute rejection [isradipine: (42+6)/98 (49%) versus placebo: (46+9)/112 (49%), P=1.00]. Renal vein thrombosis was observed in eight patients. This proved to be associated with the route of administration of the study medication [6/45 (13%) on i.v. medication versus 2/165 (1%) on oral medication, P<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of isradipine results in a better renal function after kidney transplantation, without effect on incidence or severity of DGF or acute rejection.     

Meta-analysis of calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens in kidney transplantation

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies in kidney transplantation may spare patients the adverse effects of these drugs, but the efficacy of these strategies is unknown. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to assess outcomes associated with reducing calcineurin inhibitor exposure from the time of transplantation. We search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2010 that compared de novo calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens to calcineurin-inhibitor-based regimens. In this analysis, we include 56 studies comprising data from 11337 renal transplant recipients. Use of the contemporary agents belatacept or tofacitinib, in combination with mycophenolate, decreased the odds of overall graft failure (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.96; P = 0.03). Similarly, minimization of calcineurin inhibitors in combination with various induction and adjunctive agents reduces the odds of graft failure (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.92; P = 0.009). Conversely, the use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), in combination with mycophenolate, increases the odds of graft failure (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.90; P = 0.01). Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing strategies are associated with less delayed graft function (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.02), improved graft function, and less new-onset diabetes. The more contemporary protocols did not seem to increase rates of acute rejection. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that reducing exposure to calcineurin inhibitors immediately after kidney transplantation may improve clinical outcomes.     

Role of donor age and acute rejection episodes on long-term graft survival in cadaveric kidney transplantations

Cadaveric donors can provide an effective solution to the problem of organ shortage, and many factors that may affect the functioning and survival of cadaveric kidneys have been studied. We aimed to clarify the impact of donor age and acute rejection episodes on long-term graft and patient survival in patients receiving cadaveric renal transplants. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term outcomes of 207 patients who had received cadaveric renal transplants between 1985 and 2004. Mean recipient age, HLA mismatch, mean donor age, delayed graft function (DGF), mean cold ischemia time, acute rejection episodes in the first 6 months after transplantation, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survivals were evaluated. Two study groups were created according to donor age: group 1 (n = 126) was composed of patients receiving kidneys from donors younger than 50 years, and group 2 (n = 81) was composed of patients receiving kidneys from donors 50 years of age or older. Mean recipient age, HLA mismatch, and mean cold ischemia time between groups were not different. The DGF rate in group 1 was 40% (n = 50) and in group 2 was 46% (n = 37) (P > .05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients without acute rejection within the first 6 months after transplantation in group 1 (58/126; 46%) versus those in group 2 (46/81; 57%) were 95% versus 90%, 65% versus 60%, and 40% versus 35%, respectively (P > .05). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates of patients with acute rejection within the first 6 months in group 1 (n = 68) versus those in group 2 (n = 35) were 93% versus 89%, 71% versus 55%, and 44% versus 28%, respectively (P = .005). There was no significant difference in 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates between patients with DGF in both groups. Acute rejection episodes within the first 6 months after cadaveric transplantation, especially in patients receiving kidneys from donors older than 50 years, were shown to affect 5-year survival of the kidney graft. However, cadaver age alone had no negative effect on 5-year graft survival rates. Cadaveric donors older than 50 years may be a solution to the organ shortage in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.     

Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.     

Kidneys From Standard-Criteria Donors With Different Severities of Terminal Acute Kidney Injury

ObjectivesHigh terminal serum creatinine level in a deceased donor has been reported as the second most frequent cause of refusal for kidney transplantation. A growing body of evidence has shown a comparable outcome of kidney transplantation from deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the influence of the severity of AKI on graft outcomes remains to be elucidated.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 84 consecutive kidney transplants from 57 standard-criteria donors were classified into 4 groups by RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, and End-stage renal disease) classification according to donor AKI severity before kidney procurement. The donor and recipient characteristics and graft outcomes were compared.ResultsOf 84 kidney transplants, 56, 11, 10, and 7 recipients were in the Non-AKI, Risk, Injury, and Failure groups. The mean terminal creatinine was 1.1, 1.6, 2.3, and 4.4 mg/dL in these 4 groups. However, the graft outcomes, including primary nonfunction rate, delayed graft function rate, acute rejection rate, renal function, graft survival and overall survival over the first 5 years had no statistical difference. A trend toward increasing delayed graft function rate as the severity of AKI increased was observed (Non-AKI, Risk, Injury, and Failure: 26.8%, 36.4%, 60.0%, and 57.1%, P = .099).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that AKI before procurement does not cause adverse long-term graft outcomes. Standard-criteria donors with AKI are suitable for kidney transplantation, even with a high severity of AKI.     

Living related kidney donors over 60 years old

The lack of available cadaveric organs for transplantation has resulted in an increased number of kidney transplants from living donors. During a period of 6 years, 149 kidney transplantations were performed from living related donors in our institute, 33.5% of whom were older than 60 years of age. In this study we examined the survival of patients and grafts as well as the graft function in 50 patients with transplants from donors over 60 years (mean age 65 years) as compared with those of 99 patients with transplants from donors younger than 60 years (mean age 47 years). There were no significant differences in the course of donor nephrectomy, postoperative complications, or remnant kidney function. However, delayed graft function occurred more frequently in recipients of transplants from older donors. Improvement in graft function was also slower in recipients of kidneys from older donors, with significant differences in serum creatinine levels observed during the first 12 months after transplantation. More frequent acute complications and more progressive chronic graft failure, irrespective of the causes, occurred during the 1st post-transplant year in recipients with grafts from older donors. Five-year patient survival (77% vs 92%) and kidney graft survival differed significantly for the same period with worse results for patients receiving grafts from older donors. It may be concluded that kidney grafts from donors older than 60 years — and especially those older than 70 years — may be used for living related kidney transplantation, but with precautions.     

Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post‐transplant outcomes

Singh RP, Farney AC, Rogers J, Zuckerman J, Reeves‐Daniel A, Hartmann E, Iskandar S, Adams P, Stratta RJ. Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post‐transplant outcomes.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 255–264. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Introduction: Delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in recipients of kidney transplants from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors compared to donation after brain death (DBD) donors. Methods: Single‐center retrospective study to evaluate the impact of DGF on controlled (Maastricht category III) DCD donor kidney transplant outcomes. Results: From 10/01 to 6/08, 578 adult deceased donor kidney transplants were performed including 70 (12%) from DCD and 508 (88%) from DBD donors. Mean follow‐up was 36 months. DCD donor kidney transplants had significantly greater rates of DGF (57% DCD vs. 21% DBD, p < 0.0001)) and acute rejection (29% DCD vs. 16% DBD, p = 0.018) compared to DBD donor kidney transplants, but patient and graft survival rates were similar. DBD donor kidney transplants with DGF (n = 109) had significantly greater rates of death‐censored graft loss (12.5% DCD vs. 31% DBD), primary non‐function (0 DCD vs. 10% DBD) and higher 2 year mean serum creatinine levels (1.4 DCD vs. 2.7 mg/dL DBD) compared to DCD donor kidney transplants with DGF (n = 40, all p < 0.04). On univariate analysis, the presence of acute rejection and older donor age were the only significant risk factors for death‐censored graft loss in DCD donor kidney transplants, whereas DGF was not a risk factor. Conclusion: Despite higher rates of DGF and acute rejection in DCD donor kidney transplants, subsequent outcomes in DCD donor kidney transplants with DGF are better than in DBD donor kidney transplants experiencing DGF, and similar to outcomes in DCD donor kidney transplants without DGF.     

Long-term renal allograft outcome after simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In selected young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure, simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation is the treatment of choice. We conducted a retrospective, case-controlled study to compare the function, survival and pathology of renal allografts after SPK and kidney-alone (KA) transplantations. METHODS: We studied 26 consecutive SPK patients and 67 KA controls matched for time of transplantation. Renal function was assessed by routine evaluation of serum creatinine and its course by the 1/serum creatinine vs time curve. Histologic evaluation of early biopsies (0-3 months post-transplantation, n=63), intermediate biopsies (3 months-1 year, n=75) and late biopsies (after 1 year, n=35) were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: SPK and KA recipients differed significantly with regard to donor and recipient age, time on the waiting list, HLA sensitization, renal cold ischaemia time (CIT) and the incidence of delayed graft function. Acute rejection was more frequent after SPK than KA (54 vs 27%; P=0.01), despite higher trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors. After SPK and KA, actuarial patient and renal allograft survival and renal function were comparable at 1 and 4 years. Severe chronic lesions, especially vascular lesions, and calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity were more frequent in intermediate and late biopsies in the SPK group. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that patient and graft survival is comparable between SPK and KA recipients. Despite the use of optimal organs and shorter CIT in SPK, renal graft function was not different in the two groups. Histologic chronic lesions were more severe in SPK than in KA recipients. This might be caused by acute rejection episodes or be due to more severe nephrotoxicity after SPK, because of higher doses of calcineurin inhibitors, or higher sensitivity to calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity.     

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in dual kidney transplantation from elderly donors

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from expanded-criteria donors may be particularly susceptible to calcineurin inhibitor (CI)-mediated vasoconstriction and nephrotoxicity. In the early post-transplant phase, using CI may prolong ischemic injury and, in the long term, chronic CI nephrotoxicity is an even greater concern. To avoid the acute and chronic consequences of CI in kidneys from marginal donors, CI-free protocols have been introduced for maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. A CI-free protocol of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids has been adopted at our center in recipients of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from elderly donors (EDs). METHODS: Dual kidney transplantations performed since April 2003 on CI-free immunosuppression (group 1 = 31) were compared with earlier DKTs in recipients treated with CI-based therapy (group 2 = 25), retrospectively analyzing patient and graft survival, surgical and medical complications, rejection episodes and renal function. RESULTS: No deaths occurred after a mean follow-up of 10.1 +/- 7.6 (group 1) and 48.2 +/- 17.4 months (group 2). Graft loss occurred in one patient in group 1 (bilateral renal vein thrombosis) and in three patients in group 2 (one primary non-function [PNF], one chronic rejection, one Kaposi's sarcoma). The incidence of acute rejection was 19% in group 1 and 16% in group 2. Delayed graft function (DGF) was recorded in 16% and 48%, respectively. Renal function was better in group 1, with a mean S-Cr of 135 +/- 48 vs. 210 +/- 141 micromol/L at one month and 116 +/- 30 vs. 149 +/- 49 micromol/L at six months. CONCLUSIONS: After DKT from EDs, a CI-free immunosuppressive regimen including ATG induction, sirolimus, MMF and steroids affords excellent results, with a lower DGF rate and a better renal function.     

活体亲属供肾移植25例报告

目的 评价活体亲属肾移植的临床效果。方法 总结25例亲属供肾移植的临床资料。结果 25例供者无手术并发症,术后肾功良好。25例受者移植肾全部成活,术后因肾小管坏死和肾动脉吻合口狭窄发生移植肾功延迟恢复各1例,受者和移植肾1年存活率均为100%。结论 活体亲属供肾移植肾存活率明显高于尸体肾移植。     

Two doses of daclizumab with delayed introduction of low-dose tacrolimus in elderly recipients of cadaveric renal transplants from donors >55 years of age

BACKGROUND: Renal transplants from elderly donors have a high incidence of delayed graft function, which can be increased by the initial use of calcineurin inhibitors. Our purpose was to assess the safety and efficacy of an immunosuppressive regimen using anti-IL-2R antibodies and MMF that allows delayed introduction of low-dose tacrolimus using elderly donors to elderly recipients. METHODS: This observational study involved 13 transplant centers. In total there were 119 patients (age 60.5 +/- 6.6 years, range 50 to 77) who received a kidney from a donor of mean age 64 +/- 5 years (range 55 to 76), 94% of whom died from a CVA. Immunosuppression consisted of daclizumab (1 mg/kg in two doses; preoperatively and on day 14) combined with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil (initial dose of 2 g/d), and tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg per day). Tacrolimus was introduced before day 7 (mean 5.5 days) and adjusted to a target level of 5 to 8 ng/mL. The mean follow-up was 8 months. RESULTS: Two grafts were lost due to primary nonfunction and acute rejection and 48 patients (40%) required dialysis due to delayed graft function, although it was generally of short duration (median 4 days; only 2 cases >2 weeks). Acute rejection occurred in 16 patients (13.4%), of whom 13 were biopsy-confirmed (10.9%; Banff 1997 grades I and II). Three patients withdrew from the study, and three died (sepsis, accident, and cardiovascular event). The remaining 111 patients continued follow-up, with a median creatinine value of 1.5 mg/dL at 12-months. Eighty-six percent of patients had at least one episode of infection, half of which were urinary tract infections. There were 16 cases of CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the initial results, our immunosuppressive regimen seems to offer good short-term renal function while maintaining an acceptable rejection rate and a low incidence of serious infections.     

Should we use kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury for renal transplantation?

The scarcity of donor organs for transplant results in long waiting times for kidney transplantation and low transplant rate worldwide. Utilization of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the strategies that has attracted attention recently. This article reviewed the outcomes of transplanted renal allografts from donors with acute kidney injury. Key findings about the transplant outcomes included a higher incidence of delayed graft function and primary non function, but respectable outcomes in the context of similar acute rejection rates, and graft function and graft survival. Against this background and with evidence of high mortality for patients remaining on waiting list of transplant, we advocate consideration of AKI donors for kidney transplantation.     

Dynamics of erythropoiesis following renal transplantation

We examined the temporal dynamics of the correction of anemia following renal transplantation in 65 recipients using a sensitive radioimmunoassay for erythropoietin to determine the effects of modern immunosuppressive agents, delayed graft function, and early acute rejection. Pretransplant mean erythropoietin (25.6 +/- 3.3 mU/ml) was only 25% of the expected value at the mean hematocrit of 27.2 +/- 0.7, and erythropoietin correlated positively with hematocrit (r = 0.37, P less than 0.05). Following onset of graft function, erythropoietin increased to 109 +/- 13 mU/ml and then decreased in a negative feedback fashion over the next several months. Delayed graft function was associated with delay in the assumption of this orderly process irrespective of the immunosuppressive regimen used. Cyclosporine A produced a biphasic response despite delayed graft function in recipients with underlying adult polycystic kidney disease. Correction of anemia required resumption of graft function. Onset of acute graft rejection within the first month posttransplantation (14 episodes in 11 patients) abrogated the hematopoietic response until the rejection was successfully reversed. We conclude that a major cause for the anemia of renal failure is subnormal production of erythropoietin. Following transplantation, anemia corrects in an orderly manner with restoration of the normal biofeedback process between erythropoietin and red cell mass. This process is delayed by failure of graft to function initially and interrupted by acute early rejection, re-commencing following successful reversal.     

Delayed graft function: risk factors, consequences and parameters affecting outcome-results from MOST, A Multinational Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after renal transplantation, and may affect graft function. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate risk factors for DGF, as well as parameters and events influencing graft function after DGF. We analyzed data collected in an ongoing international, prospective; observational study, the Neoral-MOST (Multinational Observational Study in renal Transplantation), and included in the analysis all patients with cadaveric kidney transplants for whom renal function at 1 year posttransplantation was documented (N = 8950). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk factors for DGF occurrence, and multifactorial analysis of variance (ANCOVA) to assess the relevance of different factors for GFR at 1 year. RESULTS: Higher donor age, longer CIT, male recipients, Caucasian recipients, high recipients body mass index, and PRA were all associated with a higher risk for DGF. Renal function of former DGF kidneys at 1 year was lower in kidneys of elder donors, or which had experienced rejection or CMV infection. Variations of the maintenance regimen at 1 year posttransplantation were not associated with better graft function. Multifactorial analysis showed donor age and acute rejection as significant independent factors. CONCLUSIONS: Most factors increasing the risk for DGF or having a negative impact on renal function at 1 year in grafts with DGF are predetermined. Additional posttransplant damage by acute rejection was associated with further reductions in GFR. Preventing acute rejection is an important step in achieving optimal function of DGF grafts.     

Long-term renal function in kidneys from non-heart-beating donors: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric kidneys from brain-stem-dead donors continue to be limited because the number of donors has reached a plateau. Wide recruitment of non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) could significantly increase the donor pool. NHBD renal transplants are underused because of the concern of poor quality graft function from such donors. In response to this perception, we reviewed 46 NHBD renal transplants performed in our center since 1998. METHODS: All NHBD kidneys were machine-perfused using the Newcastle continuous-hypothermic pulsatile preservation system before transplantation. A control heart-beating-donor (HBD) group was taken as the next consecutive HBD renal transplant to the NHBD transplant. The outcome and quality of function of the groups of renal transplants were analyzed for short-term and long-term performance. RESULTS: The renal transplant patients were matched for donor and recipient factors. Survival rates for allografts and patients were similar for 1 to 3 years. There was an increased incidence of delayed graft function in the NHBD renal transplants in the perioperative period. The creatinine clearance was 22.8+/-2.3 mL/minute for NHBD patients and 44.4+/-2.9 mL/minute for HBD patients at the time of discharge from hospital. This difference equalized after 3 months and the creatinine clearance for NHBD was 44.2+/-2.4 mL/minute and for HBD 49.2+/-3.4 mL/minute. CONCLUSIONS: Our results for NHBD renal transplants confirm that such grafts suffer primary warm ischemic injury, shown by the increased incidence of acute tubular necrosis and consequent delayed graft function. This produced poor renal function at the time of hospital discharge. After 3 months, the renal function of NHBD cases improved to the level seen in HBD patients.     

The use of cadaver kidneys for transplantation in young children

The role of cadaver kidney transplantation in the management of end-stage renal disease in young children is controversial. To assess the current risk-benefit ratio of cadaver first and second kidney transplants in recipients under 6 years of age, we compared the outcome of 19 transplants performed between 1984 and 1989 using a quadruple-drug regimen (Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin, azathioprine, prednisone, cyclosporine) with the outcome of 25 transplants performed prior to 1984 without the use of cyclosporine at a single institution. Twenty-five transplants were in children under the age of 3 years. In the last decade patient survival has significantly improved. One-year patient survival improved from 53% before 1979 to 90% since 1979 (P less than 0.05). The use of the quadruple-drug regimen since 1984 was associated with a significant improvement in one-year cadaver graft function from 40% before 1979 to 78% in recipients under 6 years of age, and from 22% to 82% in recipients under 3 years of age (P less than 0.05). With the quadruple-drug regimen, one-year and four-year graft function rates for children under 6 years of age were 83% for first cadaver transplants and 72% for second cadaver transplants, which were essentially the same results as in older children and adults. Children who received kidneys from donors over 4 years of age achieved the best result, with 87% one-year graft function compared with 50% for kidneys from donors under 4 years old. In 15 children with successful transplants, 8 (53%) showed accelerated growth, 5 (33%) had normal-velocity growth, and only 2 children (14%) with suboptimal renal function had poor growth following transplantation. Therefore, we believe that with a quadruple-drug immunosuppressive protocol, cadaver renal transplantation using kidneys from adults or pediatric donors over 4 years old is an acceptable form of treatment in young children with end-stage renal disease for whom there are no suitable living-related donors.