Defining the role of insulin detemir in Basal insulin therapy

Insulin detemir is a novel long-acting insulin analogue with a unique mechanism underlying its prolonged duration of action. Unlike neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin (insulin suspension isophane) and insulin glargine, which precipitate after administration, insulin detemir remains soluble after it is injected. The prolonged duration of action of insulin detemir is a result of the ability to self-associate into hexamers and dihexamers, and to bind reversibly to albumin. This mechanism of protraction provides a more prolonged, consistent and predictable glycaemic effect in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with NPH insulin. Clinical studies have demonstrated that insulin detemir administered once or twice daily is at least as effective as NPH insulin and insulin glargine in achieving glycaemic control. Most trials have also shown that insulin detemir exhibits less intrapatient variability in glycaemic control compared with NPH insulin and insulin glargine. One of the benefits of insulin detemir is its favourable effect on bodyweight. Insulin detemir has shown weight neutrality in patients with type 1 diabetes and is associated with less weight gain than NPH insulin in clinical studies. Patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin detemir gain less weight than patients using NPH insulin and insulin glargine. In addition, a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, particularly nocturnal hypoglycaemia, has been reported with insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A reduced risk of major and nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes has also been observed. Together, these data indicate that insulin detemir is a valuable new option for basal insulin therapy in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.     

新型基础胰岛素类似物地特胰岛素

通过文献检索综述了地特胰岛素的作用机制、药动学及临床评价。地特胰岛素是一种安全、有效的长效基础胰岛素类似物，与其他长效胰岛素相比，由于其药物分子之间的牢固结合及药物分子与血浆白蛋白的结合，从而延长了其进入循环和产生作用的时间，此作用特点使其降低血糖作用平稳而持久；与中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素相比，地特胰岛素的低血糖发生率特别是夜间低血糖发生率和增加体重的几率较低，可用于1型及2型糖尿病患者的基础血糖控制治疗。     

Insulin glargine: a review of its therapeutic use as a long-acting agent for the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Insulin glargine is a recombinant human insulin analogue produced by DNA technology using a nonpathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Two modifications of human insulin result in a stable molecule which is soluble in slightly acidic conditions (pH 4.0) and precipitates in the neutral pH of subcutaneous tissue. Because of these properties, absorption of insulin glargine is delayed and the analogue provides a fairly constant, basal insulin supply without peaks in plasma insulin levels for approximately 24 hours, similar to that achieved by a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Insulin glargine is indicated as a once daily subcutaneous injection to provide basal glycaemic control in adults and children aged >6 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fasting plasma glucose and fasting blood glucose levels generally improved to a greater extent in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin glargine than patients who administered Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. In patients with type 1 or 2 disease, glycosylated haemoglobin levels were slightly reduced and to a similar extent with insulin glargine and NPH insulin. Most clinical trials in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus demonstrated a lower incidence of hypoglycaemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycaemia, compared with NPH insulin. One of the most common adverse events with insulin glargine treatment was injection site pain which, in some studies, occurred more frequently than in patients receiving NPH insulin. In all cases the symptoms were mild and treatment discontinuation was not required. Otherwise, the drug is well tolerated and does not appear to be immunogenic. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin glargine once a day provides basal control of glycaemia for approximately 24 hours without inducing peaks in plasma insulin levels in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. In long term, well designed trials insulin glargine once daily improved glycaemic control at least as effectively as NPH insulin given once or twice daily. The drug was well tolerated and in most studies the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was significantly less in patients treated with insulin glargine compared with patients receiving NPH insulin. Therefore, insulin glargine is likely to be a useful addition to the armamentarium of insulin therapy by establishing basal glycaemic control with once daily administration and a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia.     

Insulin glargine: an updated review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus

Insulin glargine is a human insulin analogue prepared by recombinant DNA technology. Modification of the human insulin molecule at position A21 and at the C-terminus of the B-chain results in the formation of a stable compound that is soluble at pH 4.0, but forms amorphous microprecipitates in subcutaneous tissue from which small amounts of insulin glargine are gradually released. The plasma concentration versus time profile of insulin glargine is therefore relatively constant in relation to conventional human insulins, with no pronounced peak over 24 hours. This allows once-daily administration as basal therapy. Early randomised trials with insulin glargine generally showed greater reductions in fasting blood or plasma glucose levels and a reduced frequency of nocturnal hypoglycaemia relative to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In addition to this basal therapy, patients continued to use the regular mealtime insulin regimen to which they were accustomed. More recent data with insulin glargine have included evidence of improved glycaemic control, with improvements in satisfaction with treatment over NPH insulin. Furthermore, the time of day at which insulin glargine is injected has no clinically relevant effect on glycaemic control in these patients. There are also data from small, nonblind studies to suggest comparable glycaemic control with insulin glargine and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Results from comparative studies and meta-analyses in individuals with type 2 diabetes show lower incidences of nocturnal hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine than with NPH insulin, with two studies showing a significantly greater improvement in glycosylated haemoglobin levels with insulin glargine than with NPH. Insulin glargine is well tolerated, and is not associated with greater immunogenicity or increases in bodyweight than NPH insulin. Long-term data show maintenance of glycaemic control with insulin glargine for up to 39 months in adults and children with type 1 and adults with type 2 diabetes. In conclusion, insulin glargine is an effective and well tolerated basal insulin therapy when given as a single daily subcutaneous injection to patients with diabetes, with benefits in terms of glycaemic control and reduced frequency of hypoglycaemia over regimens based on conventional basal insulins. Accumulating data and official recommendations show the suitability of insulin glargine for first-line use in selected patients with type 2 diabetes who require insulin treatment, as well as in patients with type 1 disease, and confirm its use in children and adolescents.     

Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus

Insulin aspart (NovoRapid, NovoLog) is a short-acting insulin analogue, which has a faster onset and shorter duration of action than regular human insulin. Insulin aspart administered immediately before meals provided significantly greater improvements in glycosylated haemoglobin and better postprandial glycaemic control than regular human insulin administered 30 minutes before meals, when used in a basal-bolus regimen with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, in randomised, nonblind studies in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin aspart provided similar glycaemic control to regular human insulin, administered in a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin. Small studies suggest that the use of insulin aspart in combination with oral hypoglycaemic agents may be beneficial. Insulin aspart, administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) provided better glycaemic control than insulin aspart multiple daily injection regimens in patients with type 1 (but not type 2) diabetes, and had similar efficacy to CSII with insulin lispro or regular human insulin in type 1 diabetes. Limited studies show insulin aspart to be effective in children, adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Insulin aspart had a tolerability profile similar to that of regular human insulin in clinical trials. The incidence of major or nocturnal hypoglycaemic events reported in patients receiving insulin aspart was lower than that of regular human insulin in several studies.In conclusion, insulin aspart, administered immediately before meals in a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin, provided better long-term glycaemic control than regular human insulin administered 30 minutes before meals in patients with type 1 diabetes, and was as effective as regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. A significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia was seen in several trials. Insulin aspart CSII provided better glycaemic control than insulin aspart multiple daily subcutaneous injection (MDI) in patients with type 1 (but not type 2) diabetes and had similar efficacy to CSII with insulin lispro or regular human insulin in type 1 diabetes. Insulin aspart is an effective and well tolerated alternative to regular human insulin and insulin lispro for the maintenance of glycaemic control in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes.     

Insulin detemir: a long-acting insulin product.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerability, safety, drug interactions, dosage and administration, cost, and place in therapy of insulin detemir are reviewed. SUMMARY: Insulin detemir is a long-acting, neutral, and soluble insulin analogue with a lower within-subject variability of fasting plasma glucose levels than isophane insulin human (NPH insulin) and insulin glargine. The lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir may decrease hypoglycemic events, especially nocturnal events, and may contribute to a decreased incidence of weight gain. In vivo, insulin detemir is 98-99% bound to albumin-one of the mechanisms contributing to its long duration of action. Several open-labeled, randomized, multicenter trials have been conducted comparing the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir to NPH insulin in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. In most trials, patients were randomized to receive insulin on three different dosing schedules: basal insulin twice daily before breakfast and at bedtime, basal insulin at 12-hour intervals, or basal insulin before breakfast and dinner. Mealtime insulin was given as part of the basal-bolus therapy. Glycosylated hemoglobin values were similar in patients receiving insulin detemir or NPH insulin. Insulin detemir appears to be well tolerated. The most common adverse effects reported during clinical trials were hypoglycemia, headache, dizziness, and injection-site reactions. CONCLUSION: Insulin detemir given once or twice daily as part of basal-bolus insulin therapy is at least as effective as NPH insulin in maintaining overall glycemic control in adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Insulin detemir: new drug. A second long-acting insulin analogue: many uncertainties, few advantages

(1) The standard treatment for type 1 diabetes is intensive insulin therapy, consisting of at least 3 daily injections of different insulins, one of which is a long-acting insulin. (2) Insulin detemir is the second long-acting human insulin analogue to be marketed in Europe (after insulin glargine) for the treatment of diabetes in adults and children over 6 years of age. Its action lasts about 12 hours. (3) Insulin detemir was evaluated in around 10 comparative trials, all unblinded, examining the effect of insulin detemir in terms of global glycaemic control (HbA1c level). None of these trials examined whether insulin detemir prevented complications of diabetes. (4) About 10 trials, involving more than 3000 patients, showed that insulin detemir, insulin isophane and insulin glargine have similar efficacy in treating both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. (5) The short-term adverse effect profile of insulin detemir is similar to that of isophane insulin. There is slightly less weight gain with insulin detemir, but injection site reactions occur more frequently. The long-term adverse effects of insulin detemir are not known. (6) Insulin detemir is a clear solution, leading to a risk of confusion with ordinary human insulin or a fast-acting insulin analogue. (7) In practice, isophane insulin remains the first choice long-acting insulin for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.     

Insulin detemir: from concept to clinical experience

Insulin detemir (Levemir, Novo Nordisk) is a novel, biologically engineered analogue of human insulin that has been successfully developed for clinical use in diabetes as a basal insulin. Its unique mechanism of prolongation of action, achieved through acylation to give reversible albumin binding and additional self-association, goes some way to addressing one of the fundamental limitations of previously available, subcutaneously administered basal insulins, a high level of within-person variability in time-action profile from one injection to another. The pharmacological profile of insulin detemir, characterised in a series of studies, suggested it had the potential to offer efficacy and tolerability advantages in the clinical setting. Such advantages, in comparison to NPH (neutral protamine Hagedorn) insulin, have subsequently been illustrated in trials. Despite glucose control targets that are identical to comparators, insulin detemir achieved levels of glycaemic control that, overall, were at least as good as NPH insulin in the Phase III development programme, with lower variability being a consistent finding. This was associated with consistent risk reductions in nocturnal hypoglycaemic events, which are closely linked with the basal component of insulin therapy. Another consistent finding has been a significantly reduced propensity for weight gain. An all-analogue regimen combining insulin detemir with the rapid-acting insulin aspart illustrated the potential benefits achievable when insulins that are designed to achieve defined pharmacokinetic profiles are employed clinically; blood glucose control, including hypoglycaemia, was significantly superior to a human insulin-based mealtime plus basal regimen. Insulin detemir is, therefore, a valuable addition to the range of exogenous insulins, as it should enable treatment regimens to be constructed that offer good outcomes of efficacy and tolerability.     

Bodyweight changes associated with antihyperglycaemic agents in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The majority of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are overweight or obese at the time of diagnosis, and obesity is a recognised risk factor for type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD). Conversely, weight loss has been shown to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as to lower the risk of CHD. The traditional pharmacotherapies for type 2 diabetes can further increase weight and this may undermine the benefits of improved glycaemic control. Furthermore, patients' desire to avoid weight gain may jeopardise compliance with treatment, thereby limiting treatment success and indirectly increasing the risk of long-term complications. This review evaluates the influences of established and emerging therapies on bodyweight in type 2 diabetes.Improvement in glycaemic control with insulin secretagogues has been associated with weight gain. On the other hand, biguanides such as metformin have been consistently shown to have a beneficial effect on weight; metformin appears to modestly reduce weight when used as a monotherapy. alpha-Glucosidase inhibitors are considered weight neutral; in fact, the results of some studies show that they cause reductions in weight.Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are typically associated with weight gain and increased risk of oedema, while the impact of some TZDs, such as pioglitazone, on lipid homeostasis could be beneficial. Insulin, the most effective therapy when oral agents are ineffective, has always been linked to significant weight gain. Newly developed insulin analogues can lower the risk of hypoglycaemia compared with human insulin, but most have no advantage in terms of weight gain. The basal analogue insulin detemir, however, has been demonstrated to cause weight gain to a lesser extent than human insulin. The emerging treatments, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and the amylin analogue, pramlintide, seem able to decrease weight in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors seem to be weight neutral.In summary, while reduction of hyperglycaemia remains the foremost goal in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes, the avoidance of weight gain may be a clinically important secondary goal. This is already possible with careful selection of available therapies, while several emerging therapies promise to further extend the options available.     

Insulin analogues: place of detemir (Levemir)

Insulin detemir (Levemir) is a soluble long-acting human insulin analogue acylated with a 14-carbon fatty acid. Insulin detemir is 98-99% albumin bound in plasma. It has a more predictable glucose-lowering effect than NPH insulin or insulin glargin. There is a dose-response relationship, but at the dose of 0.4 units/kg (an average normal dose), the duration of action reaches nearly 24 h. Therefore, detemir, most often injected once per day at bedtime, seems to be the ideal basal insulin in the basal-prandial therapy for type 1 diabetic patients. The boli of insulin, in order to cover shown to reduce the risk of (severe) hypoglycaemias, particularly nocturnal (up to 50 %). Fasting hyperglycaemia is often lower, but it is not necessarily true for glycated haemoglobin. In addition, detemir has been associated with less weight gain than NPH insulin. Detemir is well tolerated and no specific safety concerns have been raised.     

Insulin glargine

Insulin glargine is an extended-action biosynthetic human insulin. It precipitates in the neutral environment of subcutaneous tissue and is thus gradually absorbed into the bloodstream. The addition of small amounts of zinc to the formulation further delays absorption. In small euglycaemic clamp studies, the onset of action of insulin glargine was shown to be later, the duration of action longer and the time-action profile flatter than that of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers. Four large clinical trials of up to 28 weeks' duration have shown that a single bedtime dose of insulin glargine, in combination with preprandial short-acting insulin, is as effective or more effective than once or twice daily NPH plus short-acting insulin in improving glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In 3 large comparative trials, insulin glargine decreased glycosylated haemoglobin and/or fasting blood glucose levels to a similar extent to that seen with NPH insulin in patients with insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus, either as monotherapy or in combination with oral hypoglycaemic agents. Insulin glargine appears to be well tolerated. A lower incidence of hypoglycaemia, especially at night, was reported in most trials with insulin glargine when compared with NPH insulin.     

New insulin analogues and routes of delivery: pharmacodynamic and clinical considerations

Analogues of human insulin have been developed to more closely replicate the physiology of meal-related and basal insulin secretion. Three rapid-acting analogues and two basal analogues are available for clinical use. Insulin aspart and insulin lispro have nearly identical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and provide better postprandial glucose control and less hypoglycaemia (primarily nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus) than regular insulin. Insulin glulisine is a new rapid-acting analogue and has characteristics nearly identical to those of its predecessors. Insulin glargine was the first basal analogue approved for clinical use and has shown better fasting glucose control and less risk of hypoglycaemia than conventional human neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. More recent studies have indicated that insulin glargine may not be truly 'peakless' at higher doses and that the adjustment of dose timing and frequency may have favourable effects on the risk of hypoglycaemia and the duration of the effect. Insulin detemir is a new basal insulin analogue with superiority to NPH insulin similar to that demonstrated by insulin glargine, though its duration of action appears to be shorter. The intraindividual variability in the response to a given dose is lower for insulin detemir than for both NPH insulin and insulin glargine. The clinical significance of this finding is not clear, though it may contribute to the lower rate of hypoglycaemia seen with insulin detemir. A number of 'alternative routes' of insulin administration have been studied, the most promising of which has been the pulmonary route. The time-action profile of inhaled insulins is generally characterized by a rapid onset of action similar to those of rapid-acting analogues and a slightly protracted duration of action similar to that of regular insulin. Inhaled insulin is similar to regular insulin with respect to efficacy and safety, though small reversible changes in pulmonary function have been noted. For technical and practical reasons, other alternative routes have generally not met with clinical success.     

An update on the use of insulin detemir,with a focus on type 2 diabetes (drug evaluation update)

Background: The efficacy and tolerability of insulin detemir (detemir), a long-acting basal insulin analog, is already well documented for type 1 diabetes. This article reviews new evidence, in particular on the weight-sparing effect of detemir and its use in type 2 diabetes. Methods: All clinical trials of detemir published since a 2006 drug evaluation and up to December 2007, including large real-life studies, are covered in this review. Earlier studies are cited when relevant. Results/conclusion: In type 2 diabetes, detemir used once or twice daily achieves equivalent glycemic control to other basal insulins in treat-to-target trials but tends to improve control in patients switched from other basal insulins in basal–oral regimens. The risk of hypoglycemia (nocturnal, overall, or both) is substantially and significantly reduced with detemir compared with NPH insulin. Body weight increase is consistently significantly lower with detemir than with NPH in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The results of both glucose clamp studies and clinical trials support initiation of detemir at a once-daily dosing regimen.     

Insulin glargine: a new long-acting insulin product.

The pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of insulin glargine are reviewed. Current treatment regimens for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and some with type 2 are designed to provide a basal insulin level with intermittent preprandial insulin coverage. Insulin glargine precipitates after subcutaneous injection, slowing absorption. Insulin glargine is used as a basal insulin and exhibits a flat pharmacokinetic profile, with a duration of action of at least 24 hours. Hypoglycemia is the most commonly reported adverse effect, especially within the first four weeks after a switch to insulin glargine. Insulin glargine should not be mixed with any other insulin product and should be administered with a syringe that has not been used for other insulin products or other medications. Insulin glargine is administered once daily at bedtime. Patients previously receiving twice-daily isophane insulin (NPH) should receive an insulin glargine dosage 20% less than the total daily dose of NPH insulin. Clinical trials did not consistently show improvements in hemoglobin A1c levels when patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were switched from NPH insulin once or twice daily to insulin glargine. Insulin glargine should be considered for patients who continue to have elevated morning blood glucose levels and problems with nocturnal hypoglycemia despite receiving NPH insulin at bedtime. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin glargine significantly improved glycemic control compared with once-daily NPH insulin, but not when it was compared with combined treatment with once- or twice-daily NPH insulin. Clinical trials assessing progression of retinopathy and nephropathy and comparing insulin glargine therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy are needed to more clearly determine insulin glargine's role. Insulin glargine is a new long-acting formulation that can provide prolonged basal glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus.     

Insulin in type 2 diabetes: a useful alternative despite limited assessment based on surrogate endpoints

(1) There are few clinical trials comparing combination therapy with a sulphonylurea and metformin after oral antidiabetic monotherapy fails to provide adequate glycaemic control. The UKPDS study suggested that this combination had a negative impact on mortality. (2) The assessment of insulin therapy in patients in whom oral antidiabetic therapy fails is based solely on surrogate endpoints: mainly HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin), bodyweight, and the frequency of hypoglycaemia. (3) In a comparative randomised trial involving patients whose glucose levels were no longer controlled by a sulphonylurea, the addition of metformin or a daily injection of insulin isophane (NPH) was similarly effective in reducing HbA1c levels. However, metformin caused less weight gain. (4) There are no randomised controlled trials comparing the addition of insulin versus a sulphonylurea when ongoing metformin monotherapy is inadequate. (5) Randomised comparative trials show that, when glycaemia is no longer controlled by a sulphonylurea plus metformin, adding a daily insulin injection is more effective in lowering HbA1c levels than the addition of acarbose and as effective as adding a glitazone. The adjunction of insulin appears to have a better risk-benefit balance than an oral three-drug regimen. (6) Several randomised controlled trials have shown that the addition of an oral antidiabetic to ongoing insulin therapy reduces HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. The addition of metformin is also beneficial in terms of body weight changes. (7) Nine randomised controlled trials involving patients whose glycaemia was inadequately controlled by a sulphonylurea, alone or in combination with metformin, have compared the addition of a bedtime injection of insulin isophane versus replacement of the oral antidiabetics by several daily insulin injections. The two strategies had a similar impact on HbA1c (-1.5% to -2.5%), but patients experienced less weight gain when the oral antidiabetics were continued and a single insulin injection was added. (8) The few available comparative trials fail to show which oral treatment (a sulphonylurea, metformin, or a combination of the two) has the best risk-benefit balance when combined with a bedtime injection of insulin isophane. (9) Insulin isophane is the first-choice insulin for combination therapy with an oral antidiabetic. In comparative trials, when combined with an oral antidiabetic, insulin glargine was no more effective than insulin isophane in terms of HbA1c levels or weight gain. Insulin glargine seems to provoke less hypoglycaemia but, in the absence of adequate follow-up, its long-term adverse effects are not known. (10) When a bedtime insulin injection plus an oral antidiabetic fail to control hyperglycaemia, indirect comparisons support the use of several daily insulin injections plus metformin, or three injections of an ultrarapid insulin analogue plus a sulphonylurea.     

Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Insulin aspart, a rapid-acting human insulin analogue, provides more rapid absorption than regular human insulin after subcutaneous administration. In most randomised, nonblind clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, insulin aspart administered immediately before meals resulted in significantly lower mean glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c ) (HbA(1c)) levels than regular human insulin (usually administered 30 minutes before a meal). Insulin aspart also significantly improved postprandial glycaemic control compared with regular human insulin. The efficacy of insulin aspart was similar to that of insulin lispro when administered to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus via continuous subcutaneous infusion in a randomised, nonblind trial. Preliminary data from randomised, nonblind trials suggest insulin aspart had a trend towards lower HbA(1c) levels compared with regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biphasic insulin aspart [30% soluble (rapid-acting) and 70% protamine-bound insulin aspart (BIAsp30)] generally provided significantly better postprandial glucose control than a similar mixture of biphasic regular human insulin (BHI30) in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the long-term efficacy of BIAsp30 was similar to that of BHI30 after 2 years in a randomised, nonblind trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus reported greater treatment satisfaction with insulin aspart or BIAsp30 than with regular human insulin or BHI30. The overall incidence of hypoglycaemia with insulin aspart was lower than, or similar to, that of regular human insulin. Moreover, insulin aspart tended to be associated with a lower occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemic events than regular human insulin. CONCLUSION: The standard preparation of insulin aspart has the potential to better mimic the physiological response to meals than regular human insulin. Insulin aspart when combined with a suitable basal insulin improved overall glycaemic control and led to a similar or lower number of hypoglycaemic episodes compared with a similar regular human insulin regimen. Insulin aspart was generally as effective and well tolerated as insulin lispro when administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion in a single comparative trial. The efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart has been documented in a small number of trials. Both insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart provide for flexible and convenient administration. Insulin aspart is now well established as an effective and convenient means of providing glycaemic control which offers clinical and practical advantages over regular human insulin.     

Deleterious outcomes after abrupt transition from insulin glargine to insulin detemir in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Iowa Care (Iowa Medicaid), USA, switched insulin glargine to insulin detemir in subjects with diabetes mellitus without the approval of healthcare providers. This study set out to examine the impact of transition on parameters of diabetes management in type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the records of subjects with type 1 diabetes up to August 2007 in whom transition occurred. Subjects completing 6 months of insulin detemir therapy were included. Twenty-four subjects switching from insulin glargine to insuline detemir (group 1) fulfilled the duration with insulin detemir. Glycaemic control (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c]), bodyweight, daily insulin dose (units), total and insulin glargine or insulin detemir and rapid-acting insulin aspart and hypoglycaemic events during the last 4 weeks, pre-switch and again at 6 months post-switch were assessed. Records of 21 age-matched subjects and continuing insulin glargine for 6 months (group 2) were examined. Subjects switched from insulin glargine to insulin detemir in the same daily dose. The daily doses of insulin detemir and aspart in group 1 were adjusted by telephone weekly based on blood glucose monitoring until stabilization occurred. Subjects were followed up in the outpatient clinic every 3 months. RESULTS: Subjects in group 1 changed to insulin detemir twice a day because of a significant rise in hypoglycaemia with the daily dose used once a day. Glycaemic control remained stable on continuing insulin glargine; HbA1c 7.6+/-0.3 to 7.8+/-0.3%, while it worsened on switching to insulin detemir; HbA1c 7.9+/-0.6 to 8.8+/-0.8 despite a higher daily dose; insulin detemir 46+/-9 U/day versus pre-switch insulin glargine 36+/-8 U/day and group 2 insulin glargine 35+/-6 U/day; and greater total insulin dose: 80+/-12 U/day versus 68+/-10 pre-switch and group 2 insulin glargine 62+/-10 U/day (p<0.05 for all comparisons). Bodyweight and hypoglycaemic events were not significantly different pre- and post-switch. CONCLUSION: Switching to insulin detemir from glargine is likely to result in lapse of glycaemic control despite a higher daily insulin dose, increased number of injections and need for frequent evaluations.     

Modelling cost effectiveness of insulin glargine for the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes in Canada

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intensive insulin therapy improves glycosylated haemoglobin (Hb(A1C)) levels and delays the onset of long-term diabetes-related complications. Current treatment guidelines recommend maintaining a glycosylated haemoglobin (Hb(A1C)) of < or = 7% in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the risk of hypoglycaemia increases with lower Hb(A1C) levels. As such, patients often choose to settle for suboptimal glucose control in order to prevent hypoglycaemic events. At a given Hb(A1C) level, treatment with insulin glargine results in a lower risk of hypoglycaemia in type 1 and 2 diabetes compared with NPH insulin. It has been proposed that the lower hypoglycaemic risk will allow more patients to achieve target Hb(A1C) levels with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control. METHODS: A long-term, state-transition model was developed to simulate the natural history of type 1 and 2 diabetes. Risks of diabetes-related macro- and microvascular complications and mortality by Hb(A1C) levels were estimated based on the UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study). Outcome measures included complication rates and associated costs, insulin costs, life years (LYs) and QALYs. The baseline analysis was conducted for patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes (aged 27 and 53 years, respectively) with Hb(A1C) levels >7%, using a 36-year time horizon and a Canadian public payer perspective. Costs and effects were discounted at 5% per annum. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed on key model inputs. All costs were reported in $Can (2005 values). RESULTS: The NPH insulin group had lower total costs than the insulin glargine group for patients with inadequately controlled diabetes (Hb(A1C) >7%; lifetime difference 1398 Can dollars and 1992 Can dollars, respectively, in type 1 and 2 diabetes). However, patients treated with insulin glargine had greater total and quality-adjusted life expectancy than those who received NPH insulin (incremental LY = 0.08 and QALYs = 0.07 in type 1 diabetes and incremental LY = 0.25 and QALYs = 0.23 in type 2 diabetes). The weighted incremental cost per LY gained and QALY gained were 18,661 Can dollars and 20,799 Can dollars, respectively, in type 1 diabetes and 8041 Can dollars and 8618 Can dollars, respectively, in type 2 diabetes (discounted results). CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness ratios for insulin glargine use for type 1 and 2 diabetes provide evidence for its adoption from a Canadian healthcare payer perspective.     

PHARMAC and long-acting insulin analogues: a poor man's insulin pump--but to the poor man

Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin analogue providing a more predictable and reproducible circulating insulin profile than other available basal insulin products. Hypoglycaemia is one of the main limiting factors to patients with diabetes requiring insulin, in achieving tight glycaemic control and reduced rates of complications. Evidence from randomised controlled clinical trials demonstrates reduced rates of hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using insulin glargine compared with other basal insulin. Insulin glargine has been registered for use in New Zealand since June 2001, but currently remains unsubsidised by PHARMAC. Reducing the incidence and impact of diabetes is one of the stated aims in the New Zealand Health Strategy and the complete lack of funding for pharmaceutical agents such as insulin glargine severely limits its accessibility to patients with diabetes and would seem in contradiction to this aim.     

Insulin glulisine

Insulin glulisine is a rapid-acting human insulin analogue that has a faster onset of action and shorter duration of action than regular human insulin (RHI) in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and is efficacious in controlling prandial blood glucose levels in these patients. In large, well designed trials in patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin glulisine demonstrated a similar degree of glycaemic control, as measured by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels, to RHI after 12 weeks and insulin lispro after 26 weeks. Pre-meal insulin glulisine was also more effective than RHI at controlling 2-hour post-prandial glucose excursions in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes over a period of 12 weeks. In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin glulisine induced significantly greater reductions in HbA(1c) levels and 2-hour post-breakfast and post-dinner blood glucose levels than RHI over a period of 26 weeks. Insulin glulisine was generally well tolerated by patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes and had a similar safety profile to insulin lispro or RHI. Severe hypoglycaemia was experienced by similar proportions of insulin glulisine or comparator insulin (insulin lispro or RHI) recipients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.