Successful implantation of self-expanding valve for a failed stentless prosthesis

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation is currently used for failed bioprosthesis. The use of a transcatheter prosthesis in a regurgitant noncalcified root implanted Medtronic Freestyle prosthesis is particularly challenging. We present a successful transaxillary valve-in-valve implantation of a self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis in a failed Freestyle bioprothesis implanted eleven years earlier. Tips and tricks are discussed.     

A technique of aortic annulus enlargement with a Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis

We describe our surgical technique to manage a small aortic annulus during aortic valve replacement. Starting with the posterior annular enlargement incision described by Manouguian, a stentless porcine aortic root, with excision of the left and right porcine coronary segments and conservation of the mural wall (Freestyle MS design, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN ), was used. The Freestyle bioprosthesis enlarges the aortic annulus using a direct suture of the valve on the enlarged annulus, and the aorta is closed by a direct suture of the mural wall of the bioprosthesis. Therefore, the aortic annulus enlargement is made only using the aortic bioprosthesis, without other material.     

Efficacy of aortic valve replacement with freestyle stentless valve in patients with aortic valve disease

Stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis has several potential advantages over conventional stented bioprosthesis. The Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis, a stentless design analogous to an aortic allograft, has zero-pressure-fixed leaflets treated with an antimineralization agent, and has been shown to have benefits of superior effective orifice area, excellent flow characteristics and durability. To evaluate the early results for its efficacy in view of post-operative performance. The valve was implanted using the cylinder method, with subcoronary, root-inclusion techniques or full root techniques. No patients experienced any significant valvular regurgitation on echocardiography. The post-operative data of EDVI, ESVI and LVPWD decreased significantly as compared with the pre-operative data while ejection fraction remained unchanged. The average peak pressure gradient was 16.5 mmHg, and the average effective orifice area was 2.45 cm2. In conclusion, Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis showed excellent hemodynamic function. It seems to be suited for the older patient with a small aortic annulus.     

The first experience with using xenografts in treatment of aortic valve disease

A comparative analysis of biomechanics of implanted xenografts has shown that the functioning of the newly formed aorta root might be dependent on constructive features of the bioprosthesis, choice of the optimal type size and on the implantation technique. The best hemodynamic and biomechanical characteristics were obtained when using the technique of a complete prosthesis of the aorta root with the Medtronic Freestyle xenograft and subcoronary implantation of bioprosthesis AB-Mono- and AB-Composit-Kemerovo.     

Aortic Valve Replacement with Stentless Porcine Bioprostheses

The implantation of stentless porcine valves (SPVs) is technically more demanding than implantation of stented bioprosthetic valves. Implantation of the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis requires an,understanding of the relationships between the leaflets and the aortic annulus and sinotubular junction. In addition to proper alignment of the three commissures within the aortic root, the diameter of sinotubular junction should not exceed the external diameter of the porcine aortic valve after completion of the operation. The Medtronic Freestyle porcine aortic root bioprosthesis can be used for subcoronary implantation as well as for aortic root replacement. Degenerative calcification of a tricuspid aortic valve is the most common cause of aortic valve disease in older patients. Implantation of stentless valves in the subcoronary position is usually feasible because the geometry of the aortic root is well maintained in these patients. The bicuspid aortic valve is the second most common cause of aortic valve disease in older patients and the most common in younger patients. These patients frequently have dilated aortic root, and the Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis is ideal for implantation using the root inclusion technique. Stentless porcine bioprostheses are minimally obstructive and associated with low mean systolic gradients. In addition, they have better hemodynamic performance during exercise than stented bioprostheses. For these reasons, patient-prosthesis mismatch has not been described with stentless valves. Left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement appears to be better with stentless than with stented bioprostheses. Comparative, nonrandomized studies of aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless valves suggest that the risk of cardiac death is reduced with stentless valves and the rates of valve-related complications also appear to be lower. What remains unknown is whether stentless valves are more durable than stented ones.     

Transatrial repair of submitral left ventricular pseudoaneurysm

We report a case of deceleration injury causing traumatic dehiscence of a Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) in a 70-year-old patient 5 years after a total root reconstruction. The patient presented with progressive exertional dyspnea 6 months after a significant impact during a hockey game. Intraoperatively, there was a posterior dehiscence of the proximal suture line and almost complete tear of the left coronary leaflet. At reoperation, the patient underwent reconstruction of the aortic root and Bentall procedure with a size 23 mechanical aortic valved conduit.     

Medtronic Freestyle Aortic Root Bioprosthesis: Implant Techniques

BACKGROUND: The Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis is a complete porcine aortic root to allow implantation (1) as a subcoronary valve replacement by removing graft sinus aorta, (2) as a cylinder with the sinotubular junction intact within the aorta (root inclusion), or (3) as a complete aortic root replacement. The choice among the three implant techniques depends on surgeon preference or upon the pathology encountered. The advantages and differences among the three implant techniques are examined. METHODS: The Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis was implanted in 1163 patients in a Food and Drug administration (FDA) clinical trial between August 1992 and October 1997. There were 21 centers in the international trial using a single data repository. Clinical data was collected prior to and at operation, at 3 to 6 months and annually. The data were compiled and statistical analysis performed at the data center. RESULTS: Patients having subcoronary valve implants were older (80% > 65 years) and aortic occlusion time was about 20 minutes less than the other methods. Patients having aortic root replacement presented with more aortic valve insufficiency (20%). Pathology of the aortic root and ascending aorta requiring repair was 26%, and larger (27 mm) valves were used in 40% of patients. Risk of operation was lowest (5.0%) with subcoronary valve implants and highest (11.7%) with root replacement technique. Thromboembolism was higher, early and late, with root inclusion (3.0, 3.9%/patient per year) and root replacement (3.2, 3.0%/patient per year) than for subcoronary implants (1.8, 1.6%/patient per year). There were more patients taking warfarin at the 4-year point with root inclusion (20%) or root replacement techniques (24%) than among patients having subcoronary implants (14%). Explants of the valve occurred in 2% of patients, none of whom had aortic root replacement. CONCLUSIONS: The Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis is an effective and versatile device for replacement of the aortic valve. It offers implant techniques that can treat the aortic root pathology encountered at surgery and allows the operation to proceed according to surgeon preference.     

Wall rupture of Medtronic Freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis

The Medtronic Freestyle stentless bioprosthetic valve provides excellent hemodynamics and long-term durability. However, several studies have reported mid-term structural valve deterioration unique to cases of Freestyle bioprosthesis implantation. According to these reports, the degeneration of the porcine aortic wall causes the dilatation and disruption of the sinus of Valsalva. We encountered a very rare case of an 8 mm-long tear located just above the inflow end of the Dacron cloth. The sudden rupture of the bioprosthetic aortic wall formed a pseudoaneurysm that compressed and almost occluded the pulmonary artery leading to low cardiac output syndrome and shock.     

Complete resection of cardiac leiomyosarcoma extending into the pulmonary trunk and right pulmonary artery

A cardiac leimyosarcoma is an extremely rare tumor. We report a case of complete resection of a cardiac leiomyosarcoma extending into the pulmonary trunk and the right pulmonary artery using the Freestyle bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) and Xenomedica graft (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Horw, Switzerland). Extensive resection and reconstructive surgery with the addition of radiotherapy prolonged the patient's life.     

Primary tissue failure of the freestyle stentless aortic root bioprosthesis

We present a case of early tissue failure of the Medtronic Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis used in the aortic position which led to reoperation 27 months after implantation. Almost one half of the left coronary cusp of the prosthetic valve had torn away along the annulus. The tear started from the left-non coronary commissure and reached the midpoint of the base of the left coronary cusp. The prosthetic valve was easily excised and replaced with a new mechanical valve. There was no sign of calcification or vegetation in the excised valve. The cause of the valve dysfunction was thought to be primary tissue failure. Long-term function of the Freestyle stentless valve should be carefully followed up.     

Primary tissue failure of the freestyle stentless aortic root bioprosthesis

We present a case of early tissue failure of the Medtronic Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis used in the aortic position which led to reoperation 27 months after implantation. Almost one half of the left coronary cusp of the prosthetic valve had torn away along the annulus. The tear started from the left-non coronary commissure and reached the midpoint of the base of the left coronary cusp. The prosthetic valve was easily excised and replaced with a new mechanical valve. There was no sign of calcification or vegetation in the excised valve. The cause of the valve dysfunction was thought to be primary tissue failure. Long-term function of the Freestyle stentless valve should be carefully followed up.     

When a Mechanical Valve Goes Freestyle: A Patient Tailored Valve-In-Valve Implantation

In case of a redo operation after a full root replacement there are two possible options: replacing the entire root or performing a more conservative valve-in-valve implantation. Regarding the relatively high morbidity and mortality of a redo root replacement, the valve-in-valve implantation is the preferred choice if technically feasible. We present the case of a valve-in-valve implantation with a St. Jude mechanical valve in a Medtronic bioprosthesis in a 57-year old man. Follow-up echocardiography after 1 month showed a mean gradient of 17 mmHg and no paravalvular leakage. The combination of a St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valve implanted in a Freestyle root prosthesis has not been described. This case shows that patient tailored treatment with a St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valve in a Freestyle aortic root valve can be safely performed and might be the preferred choice for younger patients, if technically feasible.     

Eight-year results after aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes for the Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) in a large multicenter cohort prospectively followed for 8 years. METHODS: A total of 700 patients (651 [93%] >60 years of age) at 8 centers in North America were followed prospectively after aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis; the implant technique was subcoronary in 500, total root in 162, and root inclusion in 38. Follow-up was 3395 patient-years (4.9 +/- 2.3 years per patient). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was prospectively obtained at yearly intervals. RESULTS: For the subcoronary, total root, and root inclusion groups, actuarial freedom from valve-related death was 96.8% (SE 3.0%), 92.3% (SE 7.7%), and 90.9% (SE 11.2%), respectively, and freedom from structural deterioration was 98.6% (SE 2.0%), 100.0% (SE 0.0%), and 100.0% (SE 0.0%), respectively. Hemodynamics remained excellent at 6 years. Freedom from moderate or more aortic regurgitation was 86.0% (SE 5.1%), 98.7% (SE 3.9%), and 97.3% (SE 6.6%), respectively. Gradients were slightly lower (P =.0009), and the effective orifice area (P =.02) and freedom from aortic regurgitation were slightly higher (P =.03) with total root than subcoronary implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The Freestyle stentless aortic root bioprosthesis is a versatile option for aortic valve replacement. Measures of clinical outcomes and prosthesis durability remain excellent in multicenter follow-up through 8 years in a population predominantly older than 60 years at the time of the operation.     

Aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis with respect to spacial orientation of patient coronary ostia

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates our results for safety and efficacy of aortic valve replacement using the Freestyle bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) with a new modified subcoronary implantation technique. This technique takes into account the spacial orientation of the stentless bioprosthesis in the aortic root with respect to the patient's coronary ostia rather than the native commissures. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with predominant aortic valve stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement with a Freestyle bioprosthesis by means of the described modified subcoronary technique over a 15-month period. Fifty of them were followed up by means of echocardiography at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year. There were 19 men and 31 women, with a mean age of 76 +/- 7 years (range, 58-87 years). Valve size ranged from 21 to 27 mm. RESULTS: Patients with bicuspid aortic valves had a significantly larger angle between both coronary ostia than patients with tricuspid aortic valves (P =.0001). The peak and mean systolic gradients decreased significantly during the first postoperative year for each valve size (P 相似文献   

Reoperation due to failure of a Freestyle bioprosthesis

We report re-do aortic valve and ascending aorta replacements by using the valve-on-valve technique for primary tissue failure of a Freestyle bioprosthesis. A 74-year-old male, who had had a 25 mm Freestyle bioprosthetic valve implanted by the sub-coronary method 5 years previously for aortic valve regurgitation due to congenital bicuspid valve, was referred to our hospital for dyspnea and palpitation. He presented with heart failure secondary to aortic regurgitation due to primary tissue failure, and computed tomography demonstrated an enlarged ascending aorta (5 cm in diameter). The operative findings revealed that the Freestyle bioprosthetic valve had a leaflet tear at the left coronary cusp. We replaced the degenerated Freestyle bioprosthesis with a 19 mm Mosaic aortic bioprosthesis by using the valve-on-valve technique, and ascending aorta replacement was performed simultaneously. This technique can be useful for re-do surgery for degenerated stentless valves to avoid potential risks of complete excision of the bioprosthesis.     

Eight-year results of aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis

Background. Stentless porcine aortic valves offer several advantages over traditional valves. Among these are superior hemodynamics, laminar flow patterns, lack of need for anticoagulation, and perhaps improved durability.

Methods. One hundred four patients were operated on from September 17, 1992, to October 31, 1997, as part of a multicenter worldwide investigation of the Medtronic Freestyle stentless porcine bioprosthesis. All patients received a total aortic root replacement. The patients were evaluated postoperatively at discharge, at 3 to 6 months, and yearly by clinical examination and color flow Doppler echocardiography.

Results. Operative mortality was 3.9%. No patient experienced structural valve deterioration, nonstructural deterioration, perivalvular leak, or unacceptable hemodynamic performance. At 8 years, survival was 59.8%. Freedom from thromboembolic complications was 83.3%. Freedom from postoperative endocarditis was 96.9%. Freedom from reoperation was 100%. Mean systolic gradients did not change over the time period studied. They were 6.4 ± 3.8 mm Hg at 1 year and 6.7 ± 2.6 mm Hg at 8 years. Correspondingly, effective orifice area was 1.9 ± 0.7 cm² at 1 year and 1.8 ± 0.8 cm² at 8 years. The incidence of any aortic insufficiency also did not change over the length of follow-up. At 1 year, 98% of patients had no or trivial aortic insufficiency and 2% had mild aortic insufficiency. At 8 years, 100% of patients evaluated were free of any aortic insufficiency.

Conclusions. The Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis can be used safely to replace the aortic root or aortic valve for aortic valve and aortic root pathology. Total root replacement allows optimal hemodynamic performance with no significant aortic regurgitation. Results up to 8 years show excellent survival and no signs of degeneration. Further follow-up is still needed to determine valve durability.     

Aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis

From April, 1999 to November, 1999, 8 patients underwent the aortic valve replacement using Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis. Mean age was 67.8 years old. Aortic valve etiology was as follows, AS: 1 case, AR: 2 cases, ASR: 3 cases, IE: 1 case, mechanical valve malfunction due to subvalvular pannus: 1 case. The implanted valve size was 25: 2 cases, 23: 3 cases, 21: 1 cases, 19: 2 cases. Surgical technique was subcoronary: 7 cases, full-root: 1 case. Post-op 2D-echo revealed tribial aortic valve incompetence in two cases because of size discrepancy between the aortic annulus and the ascending aorta. Pacemaker implantation was needed in 1 case because of the complete A-V block. In comparison with 5 cases of aortic valve replacement with Hancock II performed in same period, there were no significant differences about the implanted valve size and mean systolic pressure gradient, but the effective orifice area in Freestyle cases was significantly larger than Hancock II cases.     

Aortic valve replacement with medtronic freestyle bioprosthesis: operative technique and results

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the initial results for safety and efficacy of aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the Medtronic Freestyle Bioprosthesis. METHODS: One hundred three patients underwent AVR with the Medtronic Freestyle Bioprosthesis over a 40-month period. There were 59 male and 44 female patients with a mean age of 74 years (range 36 to 88 years). Valve size ranged from 19 to 27 mm, and all valves were implanted using a freehand subcoronary technique. Anticoagulation with coumadin was only used for atrial fibrillation. Aspirin was given to patients with associated coronary artery disease. Echocardiography to assess transvalvular pressure gradient and effective valve orifice area was performed at discharge, 3 to 6 months, 1 year, and then annually. RESULTS: There were 4 (3.9%) deaths within 30 days of operation and 5 (4.9%) late deaths. Two (1.9%) deaths were valve-related, one from commissural dehiscence and one from bacterial endocarditis. Three (2.9%) deaths, two early and one late, were from other cardiac causes. The remaining deaths were from noncardiac causes. Five (4.9%) patients suffered a thromboembolic event, two had permanent neurological deficits, two had transient neurological events, and one had coronary artery occlusion. Mean transvalvular gradient assessed by echocardiography was low at all time intervals: discharge (12.8 mmHg), 3 to 6 months (11.3 mmHg), 1 year (12.0 mmHg), and 2 years (11.6 mmHg). Mean effective valve orifice area was good at all time intervals: discharge (1.4 cm2), 3 to 6 months (1.5 cm2), 1 year (1.6 cm2), and 2 years (1.6 cm2). Of the 38 patients assessed by echocardiography at 1 year, 33 (87%) had no or trivial valve incompetence and the remainder had mild valve incompetence. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Freestyle Bioprosthesis has a low incidence of early valve-related mortality and thromboembolism. The bioprosthesis demonstrates good hemodynamic performance even in small diameters and is particularly well suited for older patients and the small aortic root.     

Aortic regurgitation due to perforation of the right coronary cusp 10 years after implantation of a freestyle stentless bioprosthesis

Valve deterioration following aortic valve replacement using the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis is related to cusp tear, operative injury, or infection. We report a patient with aortic regurgitation due to perforation of the right coronary cusp 10 years after implantation of a Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in the absence of endocarditis.     

Early experience of aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: Stentless bioprostheses have been gaining popularity in recent years as hemodynamically superior alternatives to conventional stented bioprostheses. METHODS: Between July 1996 and November 1998, 13 patients with aortic valve disease, 7 males and 6 females with a mean age (+/- SD) of 68 +/- 5 years, underwent an aortic valve replacement using the Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis. The predominant lesions were stenosis in 8 patients and regurgitation in 5, while 2 patients had endocarditis. The operation was performed by a subcoronary technique in 9, root-inclusion technique in 3, and full root technique in 1 patient. RESULTS: Throughout the follow-up periods (with average follow-up period of 20.6 months), there was no hospital mortality, though there was one late death of unknown cause. The New York Heart Association class improved in all patients. The peak transvalvular gradient decreased from 18.4 +/- 9.8 to 12.6 +/- 9.6 mmHg, and the effective valve orifice area increased from 2.30 +/- 0.96 to 2.59 +/- 1.05 cm2 between the 1-month and the 6-month follow-up examinations. In patients with aortic regurgitation, the left ventricular end-diastolic/end-systolic volume index significantly decreased from 147 +/- 36/62 +/- 19 to 73 +/- 26/33 +/- 14 ml/m2 at 1 month after the operation. The left ventricular mass index also significantly decreased from 189 +/- 26 to 143 +/- 30 g/m2 in patients with aortic regurgitation and from 171 +/- 28 to 144 +/- 30 g/m2 in those with aortic stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term follow-up is required for further evaluation, the early results appeared to indicate that the Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis was suitable for elderly patients requiring aortic valve replacement.