Imaging proliferation in lung tumors with PET: 18F-FLT versus 18F-FDG.

Recently, the thymidine analog 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) was suggested for imaging tumoral proliferation. In this prospective study, we examined whether (18)F-FLT better determines proliferative activity in newly diagnosed lung nodules than does (18)F-FDG. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with pulmonary nodules on chest CT were examined with PET and the tracers (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT. Tumoral uptake was determined by calculation of standardized uptake value (SUV). Within 2 wk, patients underwent resective surgery or had core biopsy. Proliferative activity was estimated by counting nuclei stained with the Ki-67-specific monoclonal antibody MIB-1 per total number of nuclei in representative tissue specimens. The correlation between the percentage of proliferating cells and the SUVs for (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG was determined using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had malignant tumors (13 with non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], 1 with small cell lung cancer, and 4 with pulmonary metastases from extrapulmonary tumors); 8 had benign lesions. In all visible lesions, mean (18)F-FDG uptake was 4.1 (median, 4.4; SD, 3.0; range, 1.0-10.6), and mean (18)F-FLT uptake was 1.8 (median, 1.2; SD, 2.0; range, 0.8-6.4). Statistical analysis revealed a significantly higher uptake of (18)F-FDG than of (18)F-FLT (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05). (18)F-FLT SUV correlated better with proliferation index (P < 0.0001; r = 0.92) than did (18)F-FDG SUV (P < 0.001; r = 0.59). With the exception of 1 carcinoma in situ, all malignant tumors showed increased (18)F-FDG PET uptake. (18)F-FLT PET was false-negative in the carcinoma in situ, in another NSCLC with a low proliferation index, and in a patient with lung metastases from colorectal cancer. Increased (18)F-FLT uptake was related exclusively to malignant tumors. By contrast, (18)F-FDG PET was false-positive in 4 of 8 patients with benign lesions. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FLT uptake correlates better with proliferation of lung tumors than does uptake of (18)F-FDG and might be more useful as a selective biomarker for tumor proliferation.     

18F-FLT PET for visualization of laryngeal cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

The feasibility of (18)F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine PET (FLT PET) for detecting laryngeal cancer was investigated and compared with (18)F-FDG PET. METHODS: Eleven patients diagnosed with or strongly suspected of having recurrent laryngeal cancer and 10 patients with histologically proven primary laryngeal cancer underwent attenuation-corrected (18)F-FLT PET imaging 60 min after injection of a median of 213 MBq (range, 175-400 MBq) (18)F-FLT and attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET imaging 90 min after injection of a median of 340 MBq (range, 165-650 MBq) (18)F-FDG. All patients were staged by endoscopy and CT according to the Union Internationale Contre la Cancer TNM staging system. All patients underwent biopsy of the laryngeal area after imaging. Lesions seen on (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET were compared with histopathologic results. Mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and tumor-to-nontumor (TNT) ratios were calculated for (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG. Wilcoxon nonparametric testing was used for comparison of (18)F-FDG with (18)F-FLT uptake. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to correlate mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and TNT ratios of (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET. Two-tailed P values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET detected laryngeal cancer correctly in 15 of 17 patients. One lesion judged as positive on (18)F-FDG PET turned out to be normal tissue. Of 2 lesions judged as positive on (18)F-FLT PET, 1 turned out to be inflammation and the other to be normal tissue. Maximum SUVs were 3.3 (range, 1.9-8.5) for (18)F-FDG and 1.6 (range, 1.0-5.7) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). Mean SUVs were 2.7 (range, 1.5-6.5) for (18)F-FDG and 1.2 (range, 0.8-3.8) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). TNT was 1.9 (range, 1.3-4.7) for (18)F-FDG and 1.5 (range, 1.1-3.5) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The numbers of laryngeal cancers detected with (18)F-FLT PET and (18)F-FDG PET were equal. In laryngeal cancer, the uptake of (18)F-FDG is higher than that of (18)F-FLT.     

Imaging of proliferation with 18F-FLT PET/CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose  

To compare the diagnostic efficacies of ¹⁸F-FLT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on the correlation between FLT and FDG tumour uptake and tumour cell proliferation as indicated by the cyclin D1 labelling index.     

Imaging gastric cancer with PET and the radiotracers 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG: a comparative analysis.

In this pilot study, we evaluated 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET for the detection of gastric cancer and compared the diagnostic accuracy with that of (18)F-FDG PET. METHODS: Forty-five patients (31 male and 14 female) with histologically proven locally advanced gastric cancer underwent attenuation-corrected whole-body (18)F-FLT PET and (18)F-FDG PET/CT (low-dose CT). (18)F-FLT emission images were acquired on a full-ring PET scanner 45 min after the injection of 270-340 MBq of (18)F-FLT. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed 60 min after the injection of 300-370 MBq of (18)F-FDG. Mean standardized uptake values for (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG were calculated using circular ROIs (diameter, 1.5 cm) in the primary tumor manifestation site, in a reference segment of the liver, and in the bone marrow and were compared on a lesion-by-lesion basis. RESULTS: According to the Lauren classification, 15 tumors (33%) were of the intestinal subtype and 30 (67%) of the nonintestinal subtype. (18)F-FLT PET images showed high contrast for the primary tumor and proliferating bone marrow. In all patients (45/45), focal (18)F-FLT uptake could be detected in the primary tumor. In contrast, 14 primary tumors were negative for (18)F-FDG uptake, with lesional (18)F-FDG uptake lower than or similar to background activity. The mean standardized uptake value for (18)F-FLT in malignant primaries was 6.0 +/- 2.5 (range, 2.4-12.7). In the subgroup of (18)F-FDG-positive patients, the mean value for (18)F-FDG was 8.4 +/- 4.1 (range, 3.8/19.0), versus 6.8 +/- 2.6 for (18)F-FLT (Wilcoxon test: P = 0.03). Comparison of mean (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG uptake in tumors with signet ring cells revealed no statistically significant difference between the tracers (6.2 +/- 2.1 for (18)F-FLT vs. 6.4 +/- 2.8 for (18)F-FDG; Wilcoxon test: P = 0.94). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that imaging gastric cancer with the proliferation marker (18)F-FLT is feasible. (18)F-FLT PET was more sensitive than (18)F-FDG PET, especially in tumors frequently presenting without or with low (18)F-FDG uptake, and may improve early evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment.     

Comparison of 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET in esophageal cancer.

18F-FDG PET has gained acceptance for staging of esophageal cancer. However, FDG is not tumor specific and false-positive results may occur by accumulation of FDG in benign tissue. The tracer 18F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) might not have these drawbacks. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of 18F-FLT PET for the detection and staging of esophageal cancer and to compare 18F-FLT PET with 18F-FDG PET. Furthermore, the correlation between 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake and proliferation of the tumor was investigated. METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy-proven cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction were staged with CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and ultrasound of the neck. In addition, all patients underwent a whole-body 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET. Standardized uptake values were compared with proliferation expressed by Ki-67 positivity. RESULTS: 18F-FDG PET was able to detect all esophageal cancers, whereas 18F-FLT PET visualized the tumor in 8 of 10 patients. Both 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FLT PET detected lymph node metastases in 2 of 8 patients. 18F-FDG PET detected 1 cervical lymph node that was missed on 18F-FLT PET, whereas 18F-FDG PET showed uptake in benign lesions in 2 patients. The uptake of 18F-FDG (median standardized uptake value [SUV(mean)], 6.0) was significantly higher than 18F-FLT (median SUV(mean), 3.4). Neither 18F-FDG maximum SUV (SUV(max)) nor 18F-FLT SUV(max) correlated with Ki-67 expression in the linear regression analysis. CONCLUSION: In this study, uptake of 18F-FDG in esophageal cancer is significantly higher compared with 18F-FLT uptake. 18F-FLT scans show more false-negative findings and fewer false-positive findings than do 18F-FDG scans. Uptake of 18F-FDG or 18F-FLT did not correlate with proliferation.     

18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

We evaluated the amino acid and glucose metabolism of brain tumors by using PET with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-(18)F-fluoro-l-phenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) and (18)F-FDG. METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing evaluation for brain tumors were studied. Initially, 30 patients underwent PET with (18)F-FDOPA and (18)F-FDG within the same week. Tracer kinetics in normal brain and tumor tissues were estimated. PET uptake was quantified by use of standardized uptake values and the ratio of tumor uptake to normal hemispheric tissue uptake (T/N). In addition, PET uptake with (18)F-FDOPA was quantified by use of ratios of tumor uptake to striatum uptake (T/S) and of tumor uptake to white matter uptake. The accuracies of (18)F-FDOPA and (18)F-FDG PET were determined by comparing imaging data with histologic findings and findings of clinical follow-up of up to 31 mo (mean, 20 mo). To further validate the accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET, (18)F-FDOPA PET was performed with an additional 51 patients undergoing brain tumor evaluation. RESULTS: Tracer uptake in tumors on (18)F-FDOPA scans was rapid, peaking at approximately 15 min after intravenous injection. Tumor uptake could be distinguished from that of the striatum by the difference in peak times. Both high-grade and low-grade tumors were well visualized with (18)F-FDOPA. The sensitivity for identifying tumors was substantially higher with (18)F-FDOPA PET than with (18)F-FDG PET at comparable specificities, as determined by simple visual inspection, especially for the assessment of low-grade tumors. Using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis, we found the optimal threshold for (18)F-FDOPA to be a T/S of greater than 1.0 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 100%) or a T/N of greater than 1.3 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 86%). The high diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET at these thresholds was confirmed with the additional 51 patients (a total of 81 patients: sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 86%; positive predictive value, 95%; negative predictive value, 95%). No significant difference in tumor uptake on (18)F-FDOPA scans was seen between low-grade and high-grade tumors (P = 0.40) or between contrast-enhancing and nonenhancing tumors (P = 0.97). Radiation necrosis was generally distinguishable from tumors on (18)F-FDOPA scans (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDOPA PET was more accurate than (18)F-FDG PET for imaging of low-grade tumors and evaluating recurrent tumors. (18)F-FDOPA PET may prove especially useful for imaging of recurrent low-grade tumors and for distinguishing tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis.     

Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET.

This study was designed to compare the value of PET using (11)C-choline with that of PET using (18)F-FDG for the diagnosis of gynecologic tumors. METHODS: We examined 21 patients, including 18 patients with untreated primary tumors and 3 patients with suspected recurrence of ovarian cancer. (11)C-choline PET and (18)F-FDG PET were performed within 2 wk of each other on each patient. The patients fasted for at least 5 h before the PET examinations, and PET was performed 5 min ((11)C-choline) and 60 min ((18)F-FDG) after injection of each tracer. PET images were corrected for the transmission data, and the reconstructed images were visually analyzed. Then, the standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated for quantitative assessment of tumor uptake. PET results were compared with surgical histology or >6 mo of clinical observations. RESULTS: Of 18 untreated patients, (11)C-choline PET correctly detected primary tumors in 16 patients, whereas (18)F-FDG PET detected them in 14 patients. In 1 patient with small uterine cervical cancer and 1 diabetic patient with uterine corpus cancer, only (11)C-choline PET was true-positive. Both tracers were false-negative for atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium in 1 patient and were false-positive for pelvic inflammatory disease in 1 patient. For the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer (n = 3), (11)C-choline PET and (18)F-FDG PET were true-positive in 1 patient, whereas neither tracer could detect cystic recurrent tumor and microscopic peritoneal disease in the other 2 patients. In the 15 patients with true-positive results for both tracers, tumor SUVs were significantly higher for (18)F-FDG than for (11)C-choline (9.14 +/- 3.78 vs. 4.61 +/- 1.61, P < 0.0001). In 2 patients with uterine cervical cancer, parailiac lymph node metastases were clearly visible on (18)F-FDG PET but were obscured by physiologic bowel uptake on (11)C-choline PET. CONCLUSION: The use of (11)C-choline PET is feasible for imaging of gynecologic tumors. Unlike (18)F-FDG PET, interpretation of the primary tumor on (11)C-choline PET is not hampered by urinary radioactivity; however, variable background activity in the intestine may interfere with the interpretation.     

^18F-FLT和^18F-FDG PET显像早期评估荷肺腺癌小鼠放疗疗效

目的:比较18F-FLT和18F-FDG早期评估荷肺腺癌小鼠放疗疗效.材料和方法:24只T739荷肺腺癌小鼠随机分为18F-FLT和18F-FDG两组,各组再分为对照组和放疗组.放疗组接受20Gy的X线放射治疗后2天,各组小鼠经尾静脉注入18F-FLT和18F-FDG60min后行PET显像并井形探测仪测量活性分布.肿瘤增殖判定采用免疫组织化学方法测定PCNA.结果:放疗后肿瘤18F-FLT摄取较对照组明显降低(0.37±0.12%和1.25±0.19%,P<0.01),而18F-FDG摄取变化不明显.PET显像18F-FLTSUVmax值低于对照组,18F-FDG摄取变化不明显.肿瘤18F-FLT摄取与PCNA指数显著相关(r=0.8805),18F-FDG摄取与PCNA无相关性.结论:放疗后18F-FLT摄取降低较18F-FDG明显,与PCNA指数显著相关,因而18F-FLT是一种监测肿瘤治疗疗效的有前途的示踪剂.     

18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT诊断脑肿瘤的系统评价

目的 系统评价18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT显像在脑肿瘤诊断中的临床价值.方法 采用Meta分析与直接比较方法.使用计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library,从建库至2016年10月,搜索直接比较18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT诊断脑肿瘤的诊断性试验.用Meta-Disc 1.4软件进行分析,计算两种不同显像剂的合并敏感度(sensitivity,SEN)、合并特异度(specificity,SPE)、合并阳性似然比(positive likelihood ratio,+LR)、合并阴性似然比(negative likelihood ratio,-LR)、诊断优势比(diagnostic odds ratio,DOR),并绘制综合受试者工作特征曲线计算曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)与Q*值.结果 最终共纳入4篇文章,Meta 分析结果显示,18F-FDOPA PET/CT对脑肿瘤诊断的合并SEN为0.97(95％ CI =0.90 ～ 1.00),SPE为0.67(95％ CI =0.45 ～0.84),+LR为2.31 (95％ CI=1.40 ～3.81),-LR为0.07 (95％ CI =0.02～ 0.24),DOR为39.72(95％ CI=8.94～176.48),AUC为0.9725,Q*为0.9239.18F-FDG PET/CT对脑肿瘤诊断的合并SEN为0.51(95％CI=0.39～0.63),SPE为0.75(95％ CI=0.53 ～0.90,+LR为l.59(95％ CI=0.70 ～ 3.61),-LR为0.63(95％ CI =0.47 ～0.86),DOR为2.55(95％ CI =0.82 ～7.92),AUC为0.5848,Q*为0.5638.结论 18F-FDOPA PET/CT显像诊断脑肿瘤的敏感性比18F-FDG高,对脑肿瘤具有良好的诊断价值,可作为脑肿瘤诊断的方法之一.     

Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET

The objective of this study is to reevaluate the clinical significance of 1-11C-acetate (ACE) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with brain glioma, in comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET. METHODS: Ten patients with histologically proven glioma were included in this study. They underwent PET examination with both FDG and ACE on separate days. For ACE PET, 20-min data acquisition was performed just after the administration of 740 MBq of ACE; 10-20-min data were used for the analysis. FDG PET data acquisition for 10 min started 60 min postinjection of 370 MBq of FDG, approximately. Both reconstructed images were converted to standardized uptake value (SUV) images for patient body weight and injected dose. Regions of interest were placed on the tumor and the contralateral cerebral cortex, and SUV and tumor-to-cortex ratio (T/C) were calculated; these values were compared between high- and low-grade gliomas. RESULTS: SUV and T/C of ACE PET showed significant difference (SUV: 2.63+/-0.46 vs. 1.85+/-0.56, P=.03; T/C: 2.36+/-0.63 vs. 1.14+/-0.36, P=.02). In contrast, FDG PET revealed no significant difference in SUV or T/C between high- and low-grade gliomas (SUV: 7.13+/-4.31 vs. 4.71+/-1.27, P=.31; T/C: 0.98+/-0.55 vs. 0.62+/-0.09, P=.22). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study revealed that ACE PET is a promising tracer for the grading of brain glioma.     

Usefulness of 11C-methionine for differentiating tumors from granulomas in experimental rat models: a comparison with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT.

Many clinical PET studies have shown that increased (18)F-FDG uptake is not specific to malignant tumors. (18)F-FDG is also taken up in inflammatory lesions, particularly in granulomatous lesions such as sarcoidosis or active inflammatory processes after chemoradiotherapy, making it difficult to differentiate malignant tumors from benign lesions, and is the main source of false-positive (18)F-FDG PET findings in oncology. These problems may be overcome by multitracer studies using 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) or l-(11)C-methionine. However, (18)F-FLT or (11)C-methionine uptake in granulomatous lesions remains unclarified. In this study, the potentials of (18)F-FLT and (11)C-methionine in differentiating malignant tumors from granulomas were compared with (18)F-FDG using experimental rat models. METHODS: Dual-tracer tissue distribution studies using (18)F-FDG and (3)H-FLT (groups I and III) or (18)F-FDG and (14)C-methionine (groups II and IV) were performed on rats bearing both granulomas (Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin [BCG]-induced) and hepatomas (KDH-8-induced) (groups I and II) or on rats bearing both turpentine oil-induced inflammation and hepatomas (groups III and IV). One hour after the injection of a mixture of (18)F-FDG and (3)H-FLT or of (18)F-FDG and (14)C-methionine, tissues were excised to determine the radioactivities of (18)F-FDG, (3)H-FLT, and (14)C-methionine (differential uptake ratio). RESULTS: Mature epithelioid cell granuloma formation and massive lymphocyte infiltration were observed in the granuloma tissue induced by BCG, histologically similar to sarcoidosis. The granulomas showed high (18)F-FDG uptake comparable to that in the hepatomas (group I, 8.18 +/- 2.40 vs. 9.13 +/- 1.52, P = NS; group II, 8.43 +/- 1.45 vs. 8.91 +/- 2.32, P = NS). (14)C-Methionine uptake in the granuloma was significantly lower than that in the hepatoma (1.31 +/- 0.22 vs. 2.47 +/- 0.60, P < 0.01), whereas (3)H-FLT uptake in the granuloma was comparable to that in the hepatoma (1.98 +/- 0.70 vs. 2.30 +/- 0.67, P = NS). Mean uptake of (18)F-FDG, (3)H-FLT, and (14)C-methionine was markedly lower in the turpentine oil-induced inflammation than in the tumor. CONCLUSION: (14)C-Methionine uptake was significantly lower in the granuloma than in the tumor, whereas (18)F-FDG and (3)H-FLT were not able to differentiate granulomas from tumors. These results suggest that (14)C-methionine has the potential to accurately differentiate malignant tumors from benign lesions, particularly granulomatous lesions, providing a biologic basis for clinical PET studies.     

FDG PET在肝脏恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用

目的　评价PET诊断恶性肝肿瘤的价值及其局限性。方法　肝内良性占位病变患者10例 ,其中肝囊肿 6例 ,肝血管瘤 4例 ;肝内恶性病变患者 2 8例 ,其中肝细胞肝癌 (HCC) 13例 ,胆管细胞癌 (CCC) 1例 ,转移性肝癌 14例。按体重注入 5 .5 5MBq/kg18F 脱氧葡萄糖 (FDG) ,使用SiemensE CATEXACTHR+ PET仪采集和重建图像。根据FDG摄取将病灶分为 3种类型 ,A型 :病变部位摄取高于周围正常组织 ;B型 :与周围组织相近 ;C型 :低于周围组织或无摄取。结果　 9例HCC和 1例CCC为A型 ,标准摄取值 (SUV)为 3 0 2± 1 33。 3例HCC为B型 ,1例为C型。 14例转移性肝癌PET共发现转移灶 19个。结论　FDGPET可对肝内病灶进行定位、定性及转移的早期诊断 ,但应警惕HCC显像的特殊性 ,以免误诊或漏诊。     

Usefulness of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET in patients with suspected metastatic brain tumors.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET imaging in the differentiation of metastatic brain tumor from primary brain tumor and in the localization of the primary lesion in patients with metastatic brain tumor. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 127 patients (77 men, 50 women; mean age +/- SD, 55 +/- 12 y) with brain masses that were suspected to be metastatic brain tumors on radiologic studies: 77 with confirmed metastatic brain tumor and 50 with primary brain tumor. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET was performed on all patients. When the abnormal lesion was detected outside the brain, we interpreted the brain lesion as metastatic brain tumor. RESULTS: In 61 of the 77 patients with metastatic brain tumor, primary lesions were detected using whole-body (18)F-FDG PET. Of the remaining 16 patients (all false-negative cases), 7 were classified as metastases of unknown origin. In 47 of the 50 patients with primary brain tumor, whole-body (18)F-FDG PET did not show any other abnormal lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of PET for the detection of primary origin were 79.2%, 94.0%, 95.3%, 74.6%, and 85.0%, respectively. The most common primary origin of metastatic brain tumors on PET examination was lung cancer (48/61, 78.7%). The concordance rate between (18)F-FDG PET and conventional radiologic work-up was 80% in identifying primary lesion. Unknown bone or bone marrow metastases and unsuspected distant metastases were found in 14 patients (18%) and 24 patients (31%), respectively, on PET examination. CONCLUSION: Screening the patients with suspected metastatic brain tumors using whole-body (18)F-FDG PET could be helpful in differentiating metastatic brain tumor from primary brain tumor and in detecting the primary lesion.     

氟代脱氧葡萄糖与氨基酸PET在脑肿瘤中的对比研究

脑肿瘤细胞生长速率加快,能量代谢、氨基酸转运和蛋白质合成旺盛。联合18F-FDG与11C-MET的PET,比单一显像剂更有助于脑肿瘤的组织学分级、术后复发和疗效评价。11C-MET较18F-FDG能更精确地显示肿瘤扩散范围和轮廓,对制订手术和立体定向放疗计划有重要意义,是常规CT和(或)MRI的有益补充。     

放射性核素标记胆碱与18F-FDG PET肿瘤显像的对比研究

18F-FDG PET是目前临床上许多恶性肿瘤分期和再分期的首选检查方法,可明显提高恶性肿瘤的诊断准确性,对患者的治疗方案的选择产生了很大影响,而且在恶性肿瘤的疗效监测中也有很大价值.胆碱是保持细胞膜结构和功能完整性的重要成分,恶性肿瘤的胆碱代谢增高.11C-/18F-胴碱PET在临床上已用于许多恶性肿瘤的诊断及转移瘤的检出.该文回顾了18F-FDG和11C-/18F-胆碱PET在肿瘤显像中的应用价值,并比较了其优势和限度.     

18F-FDG和18F-FLT PET/CT在肺部良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值

目的:分析18F-FDG(18F-脱氧葡萄糖)和18F-FLT(18F-胸腺嘧啶)两种显像剂的PET/CT检查在肺部肿瘤中的不同影像学表现,提高PET/CT在肺部良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中价值,从而为临床治疗方案的选择提供可靠依据。方法:收集肺肿瘤患者55例为研究对象,其中男性33例,女性22例,年龄17～82岁,28例为肺内孤立肿块,其余为2～3个肿块,肿块大小0.6～11.0cm,所有患者均行肺部18 F-FDG和18 F-FLT PET/CT检查,分析18 F-FDG和18 F-FLT标准摄取值(SUV)与肺肿瘤患者的年龄、肿块大小及病理类型等相互关系和统计学意义。结果:18 F-FDG和18 F-FLT PET/CT的SUV与肺肿瘤患者的年龄、肿块大小均无统计学差异(P>0.05),18 F-FDG PET/CT的SUV与患者的病理类型亦无统计学差异(P>0.05),而18F-FLT PET/CT的SUV与患者的病理类型有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:肺肿瘤患者的肿块病理类型是影响18F-FLT PET/CT的SUV的重要因素,18F-FLT PET/CT的SUV在肺部良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中具有重要的价值。     

放射性核素标记胆碱与18F-FDG PET肿瘤显像的对比研究

18F-FDG PET是目前临床上许多恶性肿瘤分期和再分期的首选检查方法,可明显提高恶性肿瘤的诊断准确性,对患者的治疗方案的选择产生了很大影响,而且在恶性肿瘤的疗效监测中也有很大价值.胆碱是保持细胞膜结构和功能完整性的重要成分,恶性肿瘤的胆碱代谢增高.11C-/18F-胴碱PET在临床上已用于许多恶性肿瘤的诊断及转移瘤的检出.该文回顾了18F-FDG和11C-/18F-胆碱PET在肿瘤显像中的应用价值,并比较了其优势和限度.