Busulfan,cyclophosphamide, and etoposide as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has enabled the use of high-dose alkylating agents either as a single agent or in combination with other cytotoxic agents and/or total body irradiation (TBI) for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Despite improved complete remission rates, relapse and regimen-related toxicities remain challenging. In an effort to increase event-free survival and decrease the high incidence of regimen-related toxicity, we have studied the use of etoposide in combination with reduced-dose busulfan and cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen for ASCT in a group of 26 patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Median follow-up for the group was 30 months. There was no early treatment-related mortality. The main toxicity was mucositis. Otherwise, there was 1 case of reversible, clinically diagnosed hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Post-engraftment, 10 patients (38%) achieved CR, 15 (58%) patients achieved PR or SD, and 1 patient developed progressive disease (4%). Five patients in PR and 1 with progressive disease before transplant attained a CR post-transplant. The median times for event-free survival and overall survival after transplantation were 24 and 43 months, respectively. In conclusion, conditioning with busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide followed by ASCT is a safe regimen with comparable effectiveness to other previously used preparative regimens, thus providing another approach of non-TBI containing high-dose chemotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma.     

DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) is an effective regimen for peripheral blood stem cell collection in multiple myeloma.

DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) has proved to be an effective salvage therapy for refractory-relapsed MM patients. Little is known, however, about its potential as mobilizing therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DCEP in mobilizing PBSC and to define its toxicity. Fifty-five MM patients received DCEP followed by G-CSF as part of high-dose programs including autologous transplantation. At the time of mobilization, 40 patients had previously received VAD only, and 15 alkylating agents. Mobilization was successful (minimum number of CD34(+) cells 2 x 10(6)/kg) in 48/55 patients (87%), and 41/55 patients (75%) collected >4 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. Of the seven patients who did not mobilize stem cells, five (71%) had been previously exposed to alkylating agents. The median number of CD34(+) cells harvested was 5.8 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.1-22.4). There was no treatment-related mortality. The side-effects of DCEP were always tolerable. No neutropenia <1000/microl nor thrombocytopenia <50,000/microl were observed. No patient required transfusion as a consequence of therapy, or hospitalization for septic complications. In conclusion, DCEP, in addition to its demonstrated anti-tumor activity, is an effective regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells in myeloma patients, with little or no side-effects. These properties render DCEP a useful regimen for the debulking and mobilization phase of high-dose programs for multiple myeloma.     

Dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, idarubicin and etoposide (DC-IE): a novel, intensive induction chemotherapy regimen for patients with high-risk multiple myeloma

We evaluated toxicities and responses to a novel, dose intensive and time sequenced, chemotherapy programme (DC-IE) in 45 patients with high-risk myeloma. DC-IE consisted of: dexamethasone (days 1–4); cyclophosphamide (day 5); idarubicin and etoposide (days 8–10). Complete response (CR) was achieved in four patients, six patients achieved near complete responses (nCR) and 21 patients achieved a partial remission (PR). Overall response rate was 76% (CI 56–94%) for newly diagnosed patients ( n  =21) and 62% (CI 36–81%) for relapsed/refractory patients ( n  =24). Toxicities were limited to myelosupression; two patients died of sepsis during neutropenia (4%). DC-IE is active and tolerable for high-risk multiple myeloma, including patients with relapsed or refractory disease to anthracycline containing regimens.     

A combination of dexamethasone,cyclophosphamide, etoposide,and cisplatin is less toxic and more effective than high-dose cyclophosphamide for peripheral stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: From 1995 to 2001, 116 patients were enrolled in two high-dose programs including autologous transplantation, adopting two mobilizing regimens: 61 patients were mobilized with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) at 4 g/m2 (group I), and 55 patients with DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) (group II), both followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF 5 mg/Kg/day) started 48 hours after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median number of CD34+ cells harvested was similar in the two groups (5.9 vs 5.82x106 cells/kg). The target of at least 4x106 cells/kg was reached in a higher percentage of patients in the DCEP group (75 vs 59%) (p=0.05). The proportion of poor mobilizers (<2x106 CD34+ cells/kg) was 21% with HD-Cy and 13% with DCEP (P=NS). In group I, 10 patients (16%) required packed red cell transfusions, 5 patients (8%) platelet support, and the majority of patients (87%) had a neutrophil count below 500/mL, whereas none did so in group II (p=0.0009, p=0.01, p=0.0009, respectively). Neutropenia-related fever occurred in 18% of patients in group I versus 0% in group II (p=0.0005). WHO grade >II extra-hematologic toxicities (microhematuria, cystitis, infections) were seen in 8 patients (13%) of group I vs 0 in group II (p=0.007). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: DCEP is a better tolerated and more effective regimen than HD-Cy for peripheral stem cell mobilization in MM patients assigned to high-dose therapy programs.     

High dose melphalan (HDM) is superior to cyclophosphamide plus etoposide and busulfan (CVB) as the conditioning regimen in autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

<正>Objective To compare the efficacy,response and survival between high-dose melphalan(HDM) and cyclophosphamide+etoposide+busulfan(CVB) as the conditioning regimen in autologous stem cell transplantation(ASCT) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma     

Low-dose or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with multiple myeloma

Cyclophosphamide (CY) combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to mobilise blood progenitor cells to support high-dose therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The optimal dose of CY in this setting is unknown. We have retrospectively analysed mobilisation efficiency and need for supportive care in 57 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma previously treated with VAD+/-local radiotherapy. The patients were mobilised either with low-dose CY (LD-CY, 1.2-2 g/m(2)) (n=25) or intermediate-dose CY (ID-CY, 4 g/m(2)) (n=32) plus G-CSF. Both regimens proved to be effective in the progenitor cell mobilisation. At least 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells were collected from 88% and 84% of the patients with a single apheresis, respectively. Only one patient in the LD-CY group (4%) failed to mobilise vs none in the ID-CY group. Patients mobilised with LD-CY plus G-CSF had less toxicity: fewer hospital days during the mobilisation and apheresis procedures (5 vs 9 days, P<0.001), lower frequency of fever (20 vs 73%, P<0.001) and less need for supportive care including platelet transfusions (0 vs 24%, P=0.004) and days on parenteral antibiotics (0 vs 4 days, P<0.001). While these regimens seem to be equally effective in terms of progenitor cell mobilisation in newly diagnosed patients with MM, LD-CY+G-CSF is preferential because of more optimal resource utilisation and more favourable toxicity profile.     

Vinorelbine-Cyclophosphamide compared to cyclophosphamide in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for multiple myeloma

Background

High dose Cyclophosphamide (Cy) and Vinorelbine Cyclophosphamide (Vino-Cy) are stem cell (SC) mobilisation options for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We present a comparison of mobilisation outcomes using these regimens.

Kinetics of CXCR-4 and adhesion molecule expression during autologous stem cell mobilisation with G-CSF plus AMD3100 in patients with multiple myeloma

AMD3100, a competitive antagonist of CXCR-4, disrupts the binding of its ligand, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), and facilitates stem cell mobilisation in patients with haematological malignancies. This study investigated the differential kinetics of CXCR-4 and adhesion molecule expression and their impact on stem cell yield during mobilisation with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (days 1–4) followed by AMD3100 in 10 patients with multiple myeloma. A four-colour flow cytometry-based determination of CXCR-4, VLA-4, l-selectin, PECAM, LFA-1 and CD44 expression on CD34+ cells and measurement of SDF-1 concentration were performed at different time points. After G-CSF alone, CXCR-4 expression on patients’ blood and marrow CD34+ cells was significantly lower than in the healthy controls (p < 0.001), but allowed no prediction of stem cell yield. Except in the single poorly mobilising patient, AMD3100 led to a further significant decrease of CXCR4 (p = 0.001), which inversely correlated with the CD34+ counts in the blood (p = 0.005). SDF-1 level in patients’ marrow was positively correlated with CXCR-4 expression on CD34+ cells (p = 0.011). It is interesting to note that the expression of adhesion molecules remained unaffected by AMD3100 administration. Further studies will define the possible prognostic role of AMD3100 mediated changes in CXCR-4 expression for the prediction of stem cell yield attainable with this new mobilisation regimen.     

High-dose cyclophosphamide,etoposide and BCNU (CVB) with autologous stem cell rescue in malignant lymphomas

Abstract: Eighteen patients with malignant lymphoma, 10 non-Hodgkin's and 8 Hodgkin's, were treated with high-dose CVB (cyclophosphamide 4 × 1.5 g/m², etoposide 4 × 250–400 mg/m², carmustine 4 × 150–200 mg/m²), followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC, 13 patients) or bone marrow (BM, 5 patients) transplantation. At the time of autograft 6 patients were in complete remission (CR), 3 in partial remission (PR) and 5 in relapse (4 sensitive, 1 resistant), whereas 4 had progressive disease. All CR patients had poor prognostic features at presentation. PBSC were collected at the time of rapid hematologic recovery after intense chemotherapy by means of a cell separator. All patients engrafted. Median time to achieve ≥0.5 × 10⁹/1 polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) and ≥50 × 10⁹/1 platelets was 13 days for both cell types in PBSC autografted patients, versus 20 and 28 days respectively in BM autografted patients. A significant advantage of PBSC over BM was found in terms of time needed to recover either PMN ≥0.5 and PMN≥1 × 10⁹/1 (p = 0.01). Autograft-related toxicity consisted mainly of moderate severity interstitial pneumopathy (3 patients), and veno-occlusive disease (1 patient) that resolved completely. Of the 12 patients autografted with detectable disease, 6 (50%) obtained a CR. Seven out of 18 autografted patients (39%) had disease progression within 1 to 5 months of autograft. The projected progression-free survival is over 50% at 4 years and it was significantly longer in patients with sensitive disease than in those with resistant disease (p = 0.01). The efficacy and the low toxicity of CVB suggest that autograft with PBSC may be proposed for the primary treatment of poor prognosis malignant lymphomas.     

Dose-intense paclitaxel, etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a safe and active regimen for tumor cytoreduction and stem cell mobilization in metastatic breast cancer

Patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission are the ones most likely to have an improved outcome with subsequent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HDC-PBSCT). Peripheral blood stem cells are usually procured following mobilization with single agent chemotherapy and colony-stimulating factor support. We utilized a dose-intense regimen of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 i.v., etoposide 60 mg/kg i.v., and cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 i.v. (TEC) followed by daily administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The aim was not only to mobilize stem cells but also to achieve optimal tumor cytoreduction prior to HDC/PBSCT. One hundred consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer received 257 cycles of TEC between March 1994 and June 1997, with the aim of collecting 5 x 106 CD34-positive cells/kg usually following the second cycle of chemotherapy. Patient characteristics included a median age of 45 years, a median of two organ systems involved by disease, a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens and eight prior chemotherapy cycles, and a median interval of 8 months from diagnosis of metastases to first cycle of TEC. There were 61 febrile episodes during neutropenia and 13 of these were associated with bacteremia or fungemia. Mortality rate was 1%. An adequate number of stem cells was collected in 90% of patients. The overall response rate of the tumor was 58.8% with 23.7% complete responders among 97 evaluable patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated chemosensitivity to the most recent standard chemotherapy regimen administered for metastatic disease, an ECOG performance score of 0 as opposed to 1, 2 or 3, and involvement by disease of only one organ system as significant variables for achieving a complete remission with TEC. This novel dose-intense regimen was safe and well tolerated, highly active against metastatic breast cancer, and capable of excellent stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 123-130.     

Cytoreduction and stem cell mobilization with a regimen of paclitaxel, etoposide and cyclophosphamide followed by autologous transplantation using a preparative regimen of busulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide for patients with advanced lymphoma

Forty-one patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease or intermediate or high-grade lymphoma, after having received standard salvage chemotherapy, were treated with a nonablative high-dose regimen of paclitaxel, etoposide and cyclophosphamide (D-TEC) to optimally cytoreduce their disease and simultaneously mobilize peripheral blood stem cells. This regimen produced a response rate of 78% (35% complete and 43.2% partial response) and mobilized sufficient peripheral blood stem cells in 94% of the patients. Thirty-two of these patients then underwent autologous progenitor cell transplantation after ablative conditioning with busulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide. Actuarial overall survival at 61 months was 71.9% with an event-free survival (EFS) of 65.6%. Median EFS was 24.4 months. EFS of patients responsive to salvage chemotherapy was 75% at 61 months, compared to 33.3% at 51.4 months in patients resistant to salvage chemotherapy. EFS of patients with disease sensitive to D-TEC was 75% at 61 months compared to 0% at 13.1 months in patients resistant to D-TEC. In a multivariate analysis, the only significant parameter for transplant outcome was sensitivity to D-TEC (p = 0.016), but not sensitivity to standard salvage chemotherapy. Aggressive cytoreduction may permit even those patients who are resistant to standard salvage chemotherapy to become successful transplant candidates.     

Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens

The study purpose was to determine if G-CSF plus dose-intensive cyclophosphamide 5.25 g/m2, etoposide 1.05 g/m2 and cisplatin 105 mg/m2 (DICEP) results in superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization (BSCM) than less intensive chemotherapy. From January 1993 until May 1997, 152 consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 55), breast cancer (n = 47), Hodgkin's disease (n = 14), multiple myeloma (n = 9), AML (n = 9), or other cancers (n = 18) initially underwent BSCM by one of three methods: Group 1: G-CSF alone x 4 days (n = 30). Group 2: disease-oriented chemotherapy, dosed to avoid blood transfusions, followed by G-CSF starting day 7 or 8, and apheresis day 13 or 14 (n = 82). Group 3: DICEP days 1-3, G-CSF starting day 14, and apheresis planned day 19, 20 or 21 (n = 40). A multivariate analysis was performed to determine which factors independently predicted BSCM. The median peripheral blood CD34+ (PB CD34+) cell count the morning of apheresis linearly correlated with the number of CD34+ cells removed per litre of apheresis that day. The median PB CD34+ cell count and median CD34+ cells x 10(6) removed per litre of apheresis were highest for Group 3, intermediate for Group 2, and lowest for Group 1. By multivariate analysis, mobilization group (3 > 2 > 1), disease other than AML, no prior melphalan or mitomycin-C, and less than two prior chemotherapy regimens predicted better BSCM. Out of 15 Group 3 patients who had infiltrated marrows, 11 had no detectable cancer in marrow and apheresis products after DICEP. These data suggest that DICEP results in superior BSCM than less intensive chemotherapy regimens.     

Haematopoietic stem cell mobilization with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma transplanted with autologous stem cells

A proportion of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have already undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) might benefit from a further transplantation. For this, they might need to undergo another round of stem cell mobilization. We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes of stem cell mobilization with plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a group of 30 patients who had undergone autoSCT previously, and in 46 other patients. The previously transplanted patients were significantly different from the remaining patients with respect to the intensity and number of previous therapies. We observed that the median peripheral blood concentration of CD34+ cells after the first administration of plerixafor was lower in previously transplanted (19 cells/μL) than in other patients (30 cells/μL, P < 0.05). Despite a comparable number of apheresis sessions being performed, the median total yield of CD34+ cells was significantly lower in the previously transplanted than in the remaining patients (2.8 × 10(6) cells/kg vs. 4.2 × 10(6) cells/kg, P < 0.05). However, successful collection of at least 2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved finally in a similar proportion of previously transplanted and other patients (70% vs. 82.6%). Our data suggest that stem cell mobilization with plerixafor and G-CSF might overcome the negative effect of prognostic factors for poor stem cell mobilization in patients with MM who have undergone autoSCT previously.     

Intermediate-dose melphalan (IDM) combined with G-CSF (filgrastim) is an effective and safe induction therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Twenty-one previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients and 10 previously treated patients with refractory or relapsed disease received two or three cycles of intermediate-dose melphalan (70 mg/m²) (IDM), administered intravenously every 6 weeks. Seven previously untreated patients received three and all other patients received two courses of IDM. The objective of the study was to reduce the toxicity of high-dose melphalan (140 mg/m²) (HDM) while maintaining its cytotoxic efficacy and secondly to ensure the possibility of collecting sufficient numbers of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for transplantation. 18 (85%) previously untreated patients responded, of whom four achieved CR (18%). In addition five out of 10 previously treated patients with refractory or relapsed disease responded although bone marrow toxicity in this category was a major drawback. Toxicity was moderate, consisting of alopecia and moderate bone marrow suppression: the granulocyte count dropped below 0.5 × 10⁹/l and platelets below 25 × 10⁹/l for a median of 8 and 6 d, respectively. No serious infections occurred and the majority of patients attended the out-patient clinic. In 12/14 previously untreated patients sufficient peripheral blood CD34⁺ cells for harvest were present in the repopulation phase after the first IDM. In nine patients peripheral blood stem cells were collected and eight patients have undergone succesful transplantation.
Repeated IDM followed by filgrastim is highly effective in untreated MM and may be safely administered to reduce tumour load prior to PBSC collection. Autologous stem cells harvested after repeated IDM have a full long-term repopulating capacity.     

IVE (ifosfamide, epirubicin and etoposide) is a more effective stem cell mobilisation regimen than ICE (ifosphamide, carboplatin and etoposide) in the context of salvage therapy for lymphoma

Two commonly used chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma salvage therapy were compared: ICE (ifosphamide, carboplatin and etoposide) ± rituximab and IVE (ifosfamide, epirubicin and etoposide) ± rituximab, for their efficacy in mobilising peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation. Significant differences were observed between the cohorts in terms of number of patients mobilising the stipulated minimum >2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg (99·2% in IVE group versus 83% in ICE group: P  =   0·0002) and also in terms of the number of patients achieving the predetermined target of >5 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg, both in total and during the first apheresis procedure (72% in IVE versus 51% in ICE group and 49% in IVE versus 7% in ICE group: P  =   0·02 and P  <   0·0001 respectively). This analysis of two similar groups of patients treated within a single-centre appears to demonstrate that the IVE regimen is a more effective stem cell mobilisation regimen than ICE in the context of salvage therapy for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, allowing more patients to achieve the target CD34⁺ cell collection and proceed to high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.     

High dose cyclophosphamide, BCNU and VP-16 with autologous blood stem cell support for refractory multiple myeloma

Eleven patients with advanced multiple myeloma refractory to standard doses of alkylating agents and salvage therapy with vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) were treated with high dose cyclophosphamide, BCNU and VP-16 (CBV) with autologous blood stem cell support. Seven patients had marked marrow plasmacytosis (greater than 30%) and four had extensive pelvic bone disease precluding autologous marrow harvest. Four patients responded with a median remission duration of 7 months. Recovery of granulocytes and platelets occurred promptly in 10 evaluable patients with complete hematologic recovery. Autologous blood stem cells can provide safe and effective support for high dose CBV treatment of myeloma patients with extensive marrow plasmacytosis. The short remissions call for better cytoreductive regimens with consideration for earlier use when the myeloma may be more responsive to therapy.     

Efficacy of stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after a CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen

The CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen is known to be an effective primary therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). However, stem cell yields after CTD remain inconsistent. The aim of the present study is to identify the influence of the CTD regimen on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. Fifty-four patients received four cycles of CTD, and PBSCs were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF or with G-CSF alone. Each patient from whom ≤4.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg were collected received a second mobilization course. The median duration from the start of a CTD regimen to the first collection was 4.3 months. Forty-eight patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide followed by G-CSF, and six patients were mobilized with G-CSF alone. The median day of apheresis was day 3 (range day 2–day 5). The overall response rate at mobilization was 96.3 %, including 11.1 % complete response, 22.2 % very good partial response, and 63.0 % partial response. The median number of harvested CD34⁺ cells was 12.8 × 10⁶ cells/kg. At the second mobilization, 88.9 % of patients reached the minimal stem cell collection target of ≥2.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg, and 75.9 % of patients achieved the collection target of ≥4.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg. CTD within four cycles is an effective primary therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MM and only minimally affects subsequent PBSC collection.     

Cyclophosphamide,etoposide and G-CSF to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide, etoposide and G-CSF (C+E) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma. A matched cohort study was performed comparing patients mobilized with C+E to patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF (C alone). Patients were matched for disease, prior radiotherapy and a chemotherapy score reflecting the amount and type of prior chemotherapy. Thirty-eight consecutive patients mobilized with C+E were compared with 38 matched controls. C+E was equivalent to C alone in terms of numbers of patients achieving a minimum threshold of > or =2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+)cells (82% vs 79%, P = 0.74). C+E was superior, however, in terms of total CD34(+) yield (6.35 vs 3.3 x 10(6)/kg, P < 0.01), achieving a target graft of > or =5 x 10(6)/kg (55% vs 34%, P = 0.04) and obtaining both a minimum (61% vs 32%, P < 0.01) and target (45% vs 13%, P < 0.01) graft in one apheresis. This superiority was largely confined to patients with lower chemotherapy scores. There was no difference in neutrophil and platelet recovery or transfusion requirements for those who subsequently received high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation. Thus, C+E improves the efficiency of peripheral blood stem cell collection, but does not increase the number of patients who can proceed to transplantation. Most of the benefit of the regimen was confined to patients who had not received extensive prior therapy. Novel strategies are required to increase the collection efficiency of 'hard to mobilize' patients.     

Ifosfamide,epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV) mobilize peripheral blood stem cells more efficiently than cyclophosphamide/etoposide

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support is an effective treatment in advanced multiple myeloma. In this study, we compare chemotherapy with ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV) or cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CE) in 47 patients with multiple myeloma with regard to stem cell mobilization, toxicity, and tumor response. The proportion of patients reaching the threshold of >6 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg body weight was significantly higher in the IEV group (97% vs 71%), and more CD34⁺ cells (10 × 10⁶ vs 3.5 × 10⁶ cells/kg; p = 0.002) could be collected by the first leukapheresis associated with less leukaphereses needed. Non-hematopoietic side effects were mild with nausea being more frequent after IEV treatment (30% vs 7%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (thrombocytopenia) occurred in 89 and 100% (55 and 44%) of the patients. There was one treatment-related death due to septic shock in the IEV group. Grade 3/4 anemia was more frequent in the IEV group (19% vs 0%). Forty-two percent (IEV) and 50% (CE) received inpatient treatment for neutropenic fever. In 20 and 7% of the patients, a partial response was observed after IEV and CE. However, the overall response rate (complete response and partial tumor response) after mobilization and tandem high-dose chemotherapy was 75% after IEV and 78% after CE and, thus, independent of the mobilization. In summary, both treatment protocols can readily be used for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with comparable major toxicities and similar tumor response rates. However, the efficiency of the stem cell mobilization was significantly higher after IEV treatment.     

Clinical outcomes of multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant with G-CSF or G-CSF and plerixafor mobilized grafts

Impact of Plerixafor (P) mobilized stem cells on immune reconstitution, such as absolute lymphocyte count at day 30 (ALC30), and on long-term outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has not been well established. We evaluated total of 469 patients mobilized with G-CSF (G) alone, and 141 patients mobilized with G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+ P). Patients only received plerixafor if they had peripheral blood CD34⁺ blood count <20/μL on first planned day of collection. Primary endpoint, ALC30, was 1.3 K/μL (range, 0.1-4.5) and 1.2 K/μL (range, 0.1-5.1) for G and G + P, respectively (P =. 61). The median PFS was 2.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-3.2) and 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.3) for G and G + P, respectively (HR: 1.13; 95% CI, 0.84-1.50; P = .42). The median OS was 6.1 years (95% CI, 4.6-NR) for G group compared to 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.2-NR) for the G + P group (HR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.40; P = .01). The median follow-up time for OS was 2.53 years (95% CI, 2.13-2.99) and 1.59 years (95% CI, 1.17-2.02) for G and G+ P group, respectively. In this large retrospective analysis of MM patients mobilized with G-CSF vs G-CSF + P, there was no significant difference in lymphocyte recovery or PFS. There was an overall survival difference in patients who were poor mobilizers and could not be mobilized with G-CSF alone.