CD34+ selection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation following sequential cycles of high-dose therapy and mobilization in multiple myeloma

A potential problem of autologous transplantation in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is the infusion of tumor cells. CD34+ selection has been used to purge autografts in MM and it is also possible to reduce tumour cell contamination of autografts by cytotoxic drug therapy prior to peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. To evaluate the effectiveness of a protocol combining multiple cycles of high-dose therapy and CD34+ selection to reduce tumour contamination of PBSC autografts, 34 MM patients were entered on a treatment schedule comprising two sequential cycles of mobilisation, CD34+ selection, and transplantation following high-dose therapy. In the second cycle of mobilisation there was a five-fold reduction in tumour contamination of the stem cell harvest (0.5 x 106/kg) compared with the first cycle (2.5 x 106/kg). In the 97 CD34+ selection procedures performed a median of 185 x 108 mononuclear cells (MNC) were processed yielding a median of 0.98 x 108 CD34+-enriched cells. CD34+ cells were enriched 68-fold from 1. 3% to 88.6%. The median yield of CD34+ cells was 42.2%. Following CD34+ selection the tumour cell contamination of the leukapheresis product was reduced by a median of 2.7 logs. This study demonstrates that in multiple myeloma a significant reduction in the malignant contamination of stem cell autografts can be achieved by combining the in vivo purging effect of cytotoxic therapy with in vitro purging by CD34+ selection.     

Mobilisation of tumour cells along with CD34+ cells to peripheral blood in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: Cells belonging to the malignant clone are found in the peripheral blood in myeloma patients. In order to minimise the content of tumour cells in the stem cell product it is crucial to perform stem cell harvest at a time when tumour cells in the peripheral blood are at a minimum. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the mobilisation kinetics of normal CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells during mobilisation with either G-CSF alone or high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy) plus G-CSF. DESIGN AND METHODS: Morning blood samples were drawn each day during mobilisation from start of G-CSF or HDCy and to the end of leukapheresis, and were analysed by flow cytometry for content of CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells (CD38+ + CD45-). Tumour cells were also estimated by a patient-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method based on the 5' nuclease TaqMan technology. RESULTS: Flow cytometry data from 16 patients showed concomitant mobilisation of CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells. Seven patients were mobilised twice; first with G-CSF alone and then with HDCy plus G-CSF. There was no difference between the two mobilisation regimens regarding tumour cell mobilisation kinetics. Real-time PCR was performed in one patient and confirmed the mobilisation of tumour cells at the time when CD34+ blood cells were at a maximum. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour cells are mobilised to the peripheral blood at the same time as CD34+ cells in multiple myeloma patients after priming with both G-CSF alone and HDCy in combination with G-CSF.     

Mini-ICE effectively mobilises peripheral blood stem cells after fludarabine-based regimens in acute myeloid leukaemia

Fludarabine-based cycles severely impair mobilisation and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In an effort of reversing this side-effect, we studied the action on mobilisation and collection of PBSC of a low-dose regimen: 5-d Mini-ICE (oral idarubicin and etoposide; subcutaneous cytosine arabinoside) administered after fludarabine-based regimens in seven adult AML patients. Leukapheresis were started when the CD34+ cell count was more than 10/microL. The median number of harvested CD34+ cells was 8.1 x 10(6)/kg (range 3.08-15.2). All the patients were successfully submitted to PBSC transplantation. Median times to neutrophil and platelet recovery were rapid with a normal transfusional support. We suggest that the Mini-ICE programme is feasible, well tolerated and effective in terms of PBSC mobilisation and collection in low-yield AML patients previously treated with fludarabine. It is well known that a negative effect on stem cell mobilisation and harvest is observed not only after fludarabine administration in AML or low-grade lymphomas, but also after cycles based on different agents, such as thalidomide in multiple myeloma. This preliminary experience, if confirmed on larger series and/or other haematological malignancies, could open new opportunities to perform autologous PBSC transplantation in heavily pretreated cases, allowing a full source of therapeutic options before the start of the mobilisation process.     

Dose-intense paclitaxel, etoposide and cyclophosphamide: a safe and active regimen for tumor cytoreduction and stem cell mobilization in metastatic breast cancer

Patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission are the ones most likely to have an improved outcome with subsequent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HDC-PBSCT). Peripheral blood stem cells are usually procured following mobilization with single agent chemotherapy and colony-stimulating factor support. We utilized a dose-intense regimen of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 i.v., etoposide 60 mg/kg i.v., and cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 i.v. (TEC) followed by daily administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The aim was not only to mobilize stem cells but also to achieve optimal tumor cytoreduction prior to HDC/PBSCT. One hundred consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer received 257 cycles of TEC between March 1994 and June 1997, with the aim of collecting 5 x 106 CD34-positive cells/kg usually following the second cycle of chemotherapy. Patient characteristics included a median age of 45 years, a median of two organ systems involved by disease, a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens and eight prior chemotherapy cycles, and a median interval of 8 months from diagnosis of metastases to first cycle of TEC. There were 61 febrile episodes during neutropenia and 13 of these were associated with bacteremia or fungemia. Mortality rate was 1%. An adequate number of stem cells was collected in 90% of patients. The overall response rate of the tumor was 58.8% with 23.7% complete responders among 97 evaluable patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated chemosensitivity to the most recent standard chemotherapy regimen administered for metastatic disease, an ECOG performance score of 0 as opposed to 1, 2 or 3, and involvement by disease of only one organ system as significant variables for achieving a complete remission with TEC. This novel dose-intense regimen was safe and well tolerated, highly active against metastatic breast cancer, and capable of excellent stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 123-130.     

Mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells with IVE and G-CSF improves CD34+ cell yields and engraftment in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease.

The transplantation of mobilised peripheral blood stem cells is associated with more rapid engraftment than marrow transplantation. We have previously reported that G-IVE (G-CSF, ifosphamide, VP-16, epirubicin) improves the yield of CD34+ cells mobilised in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders compared with cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 and G-CSF (G/CYCLO). In this study we have extended these observations to a larger series of patients including different lymphoma subtypes. Ninety-seven patients undergoing stem cell mobilisation were studied. Forty-two patients with lymphoproliferative disorders received G-IVE for mobilisation and 55 patients G/CYCLO. The median number of mobilised CD34+cells per leucapheresis was significantly higher for those patients receiving G-IVE: 5.82 x 106/kg (0.19-36) compared with 1.2 x 106/kg (0.04-17), P < 0.001 which resulted in a significantly reduced number of leucapheresis procedures performed in the G-IVE group. When patients were analysed dependent on underlying disease G-IVE mobilised significantly more CD34+cells per leucapheresis for all lymphoma types reaching 8.41 x 10(6)/kg (0.2-32) compared to 1.32 x 10(6)/kg (0. 06-17) for patients with high-grade NHL mobilised with G-IVE and C-GCSF respectively (P = 0.012). For patients with low-grade NHL 3. 12 x 10(6)/kg (0.10-24.39) compared to 1.08 x 10(6)/kg (0.04-9.74) were collected (P = 0.04) and for patients with Hodgkin's disease 3.02 x 10(6)/kg (1.48-36) and 1.04 x 10(6)/kg (0.1-12.3) (P = 0.001). Mobilisation with G-IVE resulted in the achievement of clinically significant CD34+ cell thresholds in a significantly higher proportion of patients compared to cyclophosphamide and G-CSF reaching >2.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in 88% vs 62% (P = 0.004), >5 x 10(6)/kg in 67% vs18% (P = 0.001) and >10 x 10(6)/kg in 31% vs 14.5% (P = 0.05). Furthermore, an analysis of engraftment demonstrated that there was a significant reduction in the time to achieve platelet counts of >20 and >50 x 10(9)/l in patients receiving each incremental dose of CD34+ cells. We conclude that G-IVE mobilizes significantly more CD34+cells than G/CYCLO in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. This effect is consistent in patients with high-grade NHL, low-grade NHL and HD and results in fewer failed stem collections and increased CD34+ cells available for transplantation which results in significantly accelerated platelet engraftment post transplant.     

Successful mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells using recombinant human stem cell factor in heavily pretreated patients who have failed a previous attempt with a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-based regimen

To assess the efficacy of recombinant human stem cell factor (rHuSCF), 48 patients who had failed to mobilize >2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (10 microg/kg twice daily) with, or without, concomitant chemotherapy (G-CSF-based regimen), were remobilized with the addition of rHuSCF (20 microg/kg/day). In all, 18/48 (38%) achieved a total of >2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with the second rHuSCF-based mobilisation alone and 29/48 (60%) achieved a cumulative total of >2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg following remobilization. Inclusion of chemotherapy in the mobilization regimen resulted in a higher yield of CD34+ cells/kg for both the initial G-CSF-based and subsequent rHuSCF-based regimens (0.90 vs 0.54, P < 0.01 and 2.36 vs 1.34, P < 0.01, respectively). The total peripheral blood stem cells PBSC collected from the G-CSF-based regimen, performance status, baseline platelet count and albumin were significantly associated with successful remobilization. Patients with multiple myeloma were also more likely to successfully remobilize. There was no threshold of total collected from the failed G-CSF-based regimen below which successful remobilization with the rHuSCF-based regimen was not possible. We therefore propose a predictive model [PBSC expected = 0.6+(G-CSF-based total collection)+2 (rHuSCF-based day 1 collection)] to calculate the cumulative total of PBSC expected following a maximum of five leukaphereses. This algorithm may permit the early identification of patients who are unlikely to achieve sufficient PBSC for transplantation and allow physicians to direct the resources involved in PBSC collection in a more appropriate and economical manner.     

Efficacy of stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after a CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen

The CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen is known to be an effective primary therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). However, stem cell yields after CTD remain inconsistent. The aim of the present study is to identify the influence of the CTD regimen on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection. Fifty-four patients received four cycles of CTD, and PBSCs were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF or with G-CSF alone. Each patient from whom ≤4.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg were collected received a second mobilization course. The median duration from the start of a CTD regimen to the first collection was 4.3 months. Forty-eight patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide followed by G-CSF, and six patients were mobilized with G-CSF alone. The median day of apheresis was day 3 (range day 2–day 5). The overall response rate at mobilization was 96.3 %, including 11.1 % complete response, 22.2 % very good partial response, and 63.0 % partial response. The median number of harvested CD34⁺ cells was 12.8 × 10⁶ cells/kg. At the second mobilization, 88.9 % of patients reached the minimal stem cell collection target of ≥2.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg, and 75.9 % of patients achieved the collection target of ≥4.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg. CTD within four cycles is an effective primary therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MM and only minimally affects subsequent PBSC collection.     

A simplified approach to stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients not previously treated with alkylating agents

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue is considered a standard part of initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. Therefore, potential transplant candidates are generally treated with dexamethasone-based programs rather than alkylating agents to avoid stem cell toxicity. The optimal mobilizing regimen for patients with multiple myeloma has not been defined. However, aggressive chemotherapy may result in excessive morbidity and cost in this older, immunocompromised population. We retrospectively examined our experience with a well-tolerated regimen of 1.5 g/m(2) cyclophosphamide on day -10 followed by 10 microg/kg G-CSF beginning on day -7 in 50 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma and no prior alkylating agent therapy. Median stem cell collection was 4.88 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg per apheresis and 44 patients collected >5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg within 2 days. In 36 patients, more than 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected including 33 patients who required 1-2 days of collection. One patient required hospitalization for fever/neutropenia and two required weekend apheresis. We conclude that 1.5 g/m(2) cyclophosphamide plus 10 microg/kg G-CSF is a safe, effective, highly predictable mobilizing program that uniformly provided enough stem cells for one transplant and enough stem cells for two transplants.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with vinorelbine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in multiple myeloma patients is reliable and cost effective

Cyclophosphamide with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to mobilize stem cells in multiple myeloma. Timing of collection is variable and incidence and severity of side effects is substantial. To optimize timing of collection, to reduce side effects and to limit costs of the procedure, we evaluated vinorelbine, a drug shown to have activity in multiple myeloma, in combination with G-CSF as mobilizing regimen. A total of 19 consecutive patients with advanced stage multiple myeloma received one dose of vinorelbine 35 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 in an outpatient setting and G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day from day 4 divided in two daily doses. Median CD34+ cell blood counts measured on day 8 of mobilization were 142 x 10(6)/l (range 57-467). One 15-l apheresis on day 8 resulted in sufficient stem cells (median 11.1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, range 6.2-36.0 prior and median 7.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, range 4.0-20.2 post-positive CD34+ cell selection) for transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery was swift with ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/l on day 11 median (range 10-15) and platelets >20 x 10(9)/l on day 12 median (range 10-15) after reinfusion of the stem cells on day 0. No episodes of febrile neutropenia were observed during mobilization. In our institutions cost reduction for the procedure was about 1700 euros compared to the mobilization with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. Vinorelbine and G-CSF allow precise timing and harvesting of sufficient stem cells, and might be an alternative to cyclophosphamide in the mobilization of stem cells for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.     

Differential mobilization of myeloma cells and normal hematopoietic stem cells in multiple myeloma after treatment with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic growth factors are now widely used to support myeloablative therapy of multiple myeloma and effect complete remissions in up to 50% of patients with apparent extension of event- free and overall survival. Because tumor cells are present not only in bone marrow, but also in virtually all PBSC harvests, it is conceivable that autografted myeloma cells contribute to relapse after autotransplants. In this study, the kinetics of mobilization of normal hematopoietic stem cells were compared with those of myeloma cells present in PBSC harvests of 12 patients after high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration. CD34+ and CD34+Lin-Thy+ stem cell contents were measured by multiparameter flow cytometry, and myeloma cells were quantitated by immunostaining for the relevant Ig light chain and by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the myeloma-specific CDRIII sequence. Results indicated marked heterogeneity in the percentages of mobilized stem cells among different patients (0.1% to 22.2% for CD34+ cells and 0.1% to 7.5% for CD34+Lin-Thy+ cells, respectively). The highest proportions of hematopoietic progenitor cells were observed early during apheresis, with 9 of 12 patients mobilizing adequate amounts of CD34+ cells for 2 autotransplants (> 4 x 10(6)/kg) within the first 2 days, whereas peak levels (percent and absolute numbers) of myeloma cells were present on days 5 and 6 (0.5% to 22.0%). During the last days of collection, mobilized tumor cells exhibited more frequently high labeling index values (1% to 10%; median, 4.4%) and an immature phenotype (CD19+). The differential mobilization observed between normal hematopoietic stem cells and myeloma cells can be exploited to reduce tumor cell contamination in PBSC harvests.     

Long-term follow up of sequential mobilisation and autologous transplantation with CD34-selected cells in multiple myeloma: a multimodality approach

BACKGROUND: Even after high dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, the majority of patients with multiple myeloma eventually relapse. Aim: The aim of the present study was to study the -feasibility and outcome of delivering a regimen including in vivo and in vitro purging and double HDT in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with advanced multiple myeloma were enrolled in a program of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone chemotherapy, high dose cyclophosphamide/granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) stem cell mobilisation, CD34 selection of harvested stem cells (in vitro purging), double HDT (cyclophosphamide/epirubicin in the first, busulphan/melphalan in the second) rescued by CD34(+)-selected cells, the second rescue using cells harvested following the first HDT (in vivo purging) and interferon maintenance. RESULTS: Forty-four per cent of patients completed the program. Fifty-three per cent of withdrawals were as a result of insufficient stem cells. This correlated to previous chemotherapy. Therapy-related mortality was 6%. CD34(+) selection achieved more than a 2-log reduction of CD38(++) cells; in vivo purging achieved 80%. Although similar numbers of CD34(+) cells were reinfused at both HDT, platelet recovery was slower after the second HDT. Additional complete remissions were achieved after each phase of therapy, 3% at the end of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone and 33% after completing planned HDT. Factors associated with longer overall survival included age less than 60 years (P = 0.044), serum beta-2-microglobulin below 3 micro gamma/L at entry (P = 0.042) and less than 2 months between the two HDT (P = 0.024). The only factor associated with a longer event-free survival was less than 2 months between HDT on study (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: (i) dose intensification with two HDT delivered within 2 months might be associated with a better patient outcome, (ii) early mobilisation should be incorporated in multiple myeloma HDT programs and (iii) higher CD34(+) doses may be required for tandem transplants.     

First-line thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation in young patients (<61 years) with symptomatic multiple myeloma

Thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy was given in patients (<61 years) with previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination as first-line therapy, and to determine its effect on stem cell collection and engraftment. During first-line therapy, thalidomide and dexamethasone were administered for 75 days (200 mg/day) and 3 months, respectively. The monthly dose of dexamethasone was 20 mg/m2/day for 4 days, with cycles repeated on days 9 to 12 and 17 to 20 on the first and the third month of therapy. After first-line therapy, a collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) was performed. Between May 2003 and September 2004, 60 patients were included. On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response (> or =partial response) rate was 74%, including 24% of patients who obtained a complete remission. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of infections (12%), deep-vein thrombosis (3%), constipation (5%), and neuropathy (5%). A total of 58 patients (96%) proceeded to PBSC mobilisation and yielded a median number of 8 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. First-line thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy is effective and relatively well tolerated in young patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. This combination does not affect PBSC mobilisation.     

The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients

A study was conducted to compare the efficiency and toxicity of two peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization procedures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Patients from group 1 (n=51) were treated by high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) plus G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day), and the second group (n=31) by VAD regimen plus G-CSF administration (10 microg/kg/day). Successful mobilization, defined by a minimal count of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg collected, was achieved in 96 and 90% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.15). The mean peripheral blood CD34(+) cells concentration and the mean CD34(+) cells/kg collected were higher in group 2 than in the group 1 (P=0.05). The mean number of leukaphereses necessary to collect a count of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg was reduced in group 2 compared to group 1. Adverse events, blood products consumption and time spent in the hospital were significantly greater after HD-CY. In conclusion, VAD plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg administration seems preferential to HD-CY plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for PBSC collection because of equivalent or better efficiency in stem cell mobilization, strong favorable toxicity profile and reduced cost.     

CXCR4 expression on transplanted peripheral blood CD34<Superscript>+</Superscript> cells: relationship to engraftment after autologous transplantation in a cohort of multiple myeloma patients

Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is believed to influence the process of these cells ‘homing’ back to the bone marrow post-transplantation, in response to the stromal cell-derived factor-1 gradient, followed by engraftment. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to compare reinfused CD34⁺ cell dose, assessed from the fresh collection, with the post-thaw viable (v) CD34⁺ and vCD34/CXCR4⁺ dual positive cell dose as predictors of haematopoietic recovery in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Cryopreserved samples from stem cell collections of 27 myeloma patients were analysed for CD34 and CXCR4 expression and times to haematological engraftment measured. Dosage of transplanted vCD34⁺ cells was on average 79% of the original calculation from the fresh collection bag (range 29–98%). The median percentage of vCD34+ cells co-expressing CXCR4 was 37% (3.7–97%). Surface expression of CXCR4 by thawed vCD34⁺ cells was closely correlated to complementary DNA levels. The median dose of CD34/CXCR4⁺ cells in the autografts was 1.2 × 10⁶/kg (0.2–3.0 × 10⁶/kg) compared with 3.3 × 10⁶/kg for transplanted vCD34⁺ cells (1.2–5.5 × 10⁶/kg). Both CD34 and vCD34 doses correlated with neutrophil engraftment (p < 0.005) although vCD34/CXCR4⁺ dose did not. However, patients given a higher dose of CD34/CXCR4⁺ cells (≥1.75 × 10⁶/kg) showed a faster time to platelet recovery (p < 0.05) than those given a lower dose (≤0.42 × 10⁶/kg). These results warrant further study of CD34/CXCR4 expression by mobilised HSCs and the relationship to platelet recovery post-transplantation on a larger cohort of patients.     

High-dose ifosfamide and etoposide with filgrastim for stem cell mobilization in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

High-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation has shown promise as treatment for recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer. We evaluated the stem cell mobilization regimen of high-dose ifosfamide plus etoposide in 32 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, who had a positive second-look laparatomy or recurrent disease. Ifosfamide was given at 10 g/m2 by continuous i.v. from days 1 to 3. Etoposide was given at 150 mg/m2 every 12 h for six doses on days 1-3. Filgrastim was given at 10 microg/kg/d s.c. from day 5 until the completion of peripheral blood stem cell harvest. Fourteen of 32 patients had measurable or evaluable disease before mobilization therapy and were assessed for response. In nine (64%) of the 14 patients, treatment response was demonstrated, and these patients received a second cycle of mobilization therapy. The target CD34+ cell dose (>8 x 106 cells/kg) was achieved with a median of one apheresis (range 1-5). A median of 25.1 (range 8.0-122.5) x 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight was collected. Non-hematologic toxicity was limited to grade 2 renal dysfunction in one patient and grade 2 hepatic dysfunction in three patients. In this patient group, high-dose ifosfamide plus etoposide with filgrastim support was well tolerated, lead to successful stem cell harvest and had antitumor activity.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in myeloma with either pegfilgrastim or filgrastim following chemotherapy

Quality and quantity of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells determine the safety of tandem autologous transplants in myeloma. Using the same mobilization chemotherapy with DT-PACE in two consecutive protocols, robustness of stem cell collection and rapidity of engraftment after transplantation were assessed. We employed either twice a day filgrastim versus two doses of pegfilgrastim. Advantages of pegfilgrastim were: (i) a higher percentage of patients collected 15x10(6)/kg in the first three days (p<0.001); (ii) the median number of CD34 cells/kg collected on day 1 was higher (p=0.004); (iii) the median number of growth factor injections was 2 versus 26 (p<0.0001); (iv) post-transplantation neutrophil recovery was faster after first and second transplant (p<0.001) and (v) platelet recovery was faster after first transplant (when less stem cells were infused) (p=0.01). Pegfilgrastim may be considered the standard of care for stem cell mobilization.     

IVE (ifosfamide, epirubicin and etoposide) is a more effective stem cell mobilisation regimen than ICE (ifosphamide, carboplatin and etoposide) in the context of salvage therapy for lymphoma

Two commonly used chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma salvage therapy were compared: ICE (ifosphamide, carboplatin and etoposide) ± rituximab and IVE (ifosfamide, epirubicin and etoposide) ± rituximab, for their efficacy in mobilising peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation. Significant differences were observed between the cohorts in terms of number of patients mobilising the stipulated minimum >2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg (99·2% in IVE group versus 83% in ICE group: P  =   0·0002) and also in terms of the number of patients achieving the predetermined target of >5 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg, both in total and during the first apheresis procedure (72% in IVE versus 51% in ICE group and 49% in IVE versus 7% in ICE group: P  =   0·02 and P  <   0·0001 respectively). This analysis of two similar groups of patients treated within a single-centre appears to demonstrate that the IVE regimen is a more effective stem cell mobilisation regimen than ICE in the context of salvage therapy for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, allowing more patients to achieve the target CD34⁺ cell collection and proceed to high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (CY) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial of 3 vs 4 g/m2 of CY

The purpose of this study was to develop a regimen of docetaxel, cyclophosphamide (CY) and filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 66). A phase I trial of CY 2, 3 or 4 g/m2 with docetaxel 100 mg/m2, in consecutive cohorts of four patients each, did not reveal any dose-limiting toxicities and subsequent patients were randomized to receive 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients was 11.06x10(6)/kg (range, 0.03-84.77) from a median of two aphereses (range, 1-7); 6.52x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis (range, 0.01-52.07). Target CD34+ cell doses > or =2.5 and > or =5.0x10(6)/kg were achieved in 89% and 79%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in CD34+ cell yields or target CD34+ cell doses achieved following 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. Patients with only one prior chemotherapy regimen yielded a median of 12.82x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis compared to 5.85 for those receiving > or =2 regimens (P = 0.03). It was concluded that the combination of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, CY 3 g/m2 without mesna could be administered with acceptable toxicity with collection of adequate quantities of PBSC from the majority of patients.     

Just‐in‐time rescue plerixafor in combination with chemotherapy and granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

Plerixafor, a recently approved peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilizing agent, is often added to granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoma or myeloma who cannot mobilize enough CD34+ cells with G‐CSF alone to undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. However, data are lacking regarding the feasibility and efficacy of just‐in‐time plerixafor in combination with chemotherapy and G‐CSF. We reviewed the peripheral blood stem cell collection data of 38 consecutive patients with lymphoma (Hodgkin's and non‐Hodgkin's) and multiple myeloma who underwent chemomobilization and high‐dose G‐CSF and just‐in‐time plerixafor to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment combination. All patients with multiple myeloma and all but one patient with lymphoma collected the minimum required number of CD34+ cells to proceed with autologous stem cell transplantation (>2 × 10⁶/kg of body weight). The median CD34+ cell dose collected in patients with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma was 4.93 × 10⁶/kg of body weight. The median CD34+ cell dose collected for patients with multiple myeloma was 8.81 × 10⁶/kg of body weight. Plerixafor was well tolerated; no grade 2 or higher non‐hematologic toxic effects were observed. Am. J. Hematol. 88:754–757, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Single Dose Preemptive Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization for ASCT After Lenalidomide Based Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Impact in Resource Limited Setting

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cytokines for autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma is adversely affected by initial induction therapy consisting of either Lenalidomide or cytotoxic drugs, with failure rates of up to 45%. The use of Plerixafor with G-CSF for PBSC mobilisation significantly improves the chances of a successful mobilization. Plerixafor is a costly therapy and increases the overall costs of ASCT which can affect the number of patients being taken up for ASCT in resource limited settings. We prospectively studied the impact of single dose preemptive Plerixafor for PBSC mobilization in patients with prior Lenalidomide exposure. 26 patients who had received Lenalidomide based induction protocol underwent PBSC mobilisation during the study period with G-CSF 10 μg/kg/day SC for 4 days and single dose preemptive Plerixafor 240 μg/kg SC stat 11 h before the scheduled PB stem cell harvest on D5, based on a D4 PB CD34+ counts of <20/μL. A median of 07 cycles of Lenalidomide based combination therapy was used for induction therapy prior to ASCT. 84% patients underwent successful mobilization with one sitting of stem cell harvest post a single dose of Inj Plerixafor. 7.6% patients failed to mobilise the predefined minimum cell dose of CD34 and could not be taken up for ASCT. The median CD34% of the harvest bag sample was 0.33% (0.1–0.97%). Injection site erythema (34%), paresthesia’s (34%) and nausea (30%) were the commonest adverse events reported post Inj Plerixafor. We did a real-world cost analysis for a resource limited setting for PBSC mobilization and found significant cost savings for the preemptive Plerixafor group.