State-of-the-Art FDG-PET imaging of lung cancer

The D-glucose analog 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) is the most commonly used radionuclide in positron emission tomography (PET) of lung cancer. FDG-PET is a molecular imaging technique that images the preferential accumulation of FDG in malignant tissues with increased metabolism. Although FDG-PET is sensitive in the detection of lung cancer, FDG is not tumor specific and may accumulate in a variety of nonmalignant conditions. Occasional false-negative results may also occur. Whole body FDG-PET is a useful noninvasive technique to stage known or suspected non-small-cell lung cancer. The results allow more efficient use of invasive methods for histopathological staging. The combined use of CT and PET in dual imaging increases the number of patients with correctly staged non-small-cell lung cancer. CT/PET is also useful in the assessment of recurrent or residual disease. Future imaging agents are being developed which may allow more selective accumulation of radiopharmaceutical in malignant tissues.     

Positron emission imaging of head and neck cancer, including thyroid carcinoma

Most positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies in head and neck cancer are performed using the radiotracer 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG). PET with FDG has become a standard clinical imaging modality in patients with head and neck cancer. It contributes valuable information in localizing a primary tumor in patients with neck nodal metastases from an unknown primary, in the staging of primary head and neck cancer, and in the detection of recurrent disease. In addition, FDG-PET provides independent prognostic information in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent head and neck cancer. PET/CT improves lesion localization and accuracy of FDG-PET and is strongly recommended in patients with head and neck cancer. After thyroidectomy, FDG-PET has proven useful in patients with clinical or serological evidence of recurrent or metastatic thyroid carcinoma but negative whole body iodine scan. PET shows metastatic disease in up to 90% of these patients, thereby providing a rational basis for further studies and therapy. In patients with medullary thyroid cancer with elevated calcitonin levels following thyroidectomy, FDG-PET has a sensitivity of 70-75% for localizing metastatic disease. Occasionally incidental intense FDG uptake is observed in the thyroid gland on whole body PET studies performed for other indications. Although diffuse FDG uptake usually indicates thyroiditis, focal uptake has been related to thyroid cancer in 25-50% of cases and should therefore be evaluated further if a proven malignancy would cause a change in patient management.     

Utility of PET in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer represents the most frequent malignant disease in women and the second leading cause of cancer death in western countries. Current available treatment includes surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. The disease is often curable when detected in early stages. Mammography is the most important screening modality; however, limitations of available procedures for the diagnosis and accurate staging of breast cancer has increased the application of metabolic imaging by positron emission tomography (PET). PET using the radiolabeled glucose analogue, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), enables visualization of increased glucose metabolism of malignant tissue. PET has been used successfully in an increasing number of oncological applications. It is an excellent clinical method to detect breast cancer over 1 cm in diameter and to accurately identify the extent of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with locally advanced disease. Recent reports have shown the high accuracy of FDG-PET imaging for staging of breast cancer patient by using whole-body PET imaging. The metabolic signal of tumor tissue allows for monitoring the effect of chemotherapy. FDG-PET can differentiate between responder and nonresponder early in the course of therapy. By identifying nonresponding patients, PET can help to avoid ineffective therapy and therefore, reduce toxic side effects in these patients.     

The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in primary staging and patient management in lymphoma patients

Fully diagnostic positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans acquired during oral and intravenous contrast can be provided to patients and referring physicians in a single imaging session. Although FDG uptake varies, most low-grade lymphomas exhibit sufficient FDG avidity to also be staged reliably with FDG PET/CT. PET/CT imaging is more accurate for lymphoma staging than PET or CT alone and has substantial impact on patient management. This accurate whole-body glucose metabolic survey should serve as the baseline for subsequent treatment response evaluations. PET/CT has evolved to become the modality of choice for staging of nodal and extranodal lymphoma, for assessing therapeutic response, and for establishing patient prognosis.     

Clinical PET in Oncology

The major utilization of clinical PET is in oncology, and oncologic PET utilizes FDG as the radiopharmaceutical. FDG imaging demonstrates the increased metabolism by malignant cells compared to normal cells. The initial clinical application of FDG-PET was demonstrated in brain tumors, and the gradation of accumulation of FDG related to the degree of malignancy. Subsequent studies have documented the accuracy of FDG-PET in detecting and staging several different malignancies. Whole-body imaging has made a major impact on the ability of PET to document the distribution of malignancy.FDG-PET imaging is very accurate in determining if an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule is malignant and in staging lung cancer. The cost-effectiveness of PET has been demonstrated for these indications. Third-party payers have policies for paying for PET scans performed in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules and in staging lung cancer. The preliminary data on the use of FDG-PET imaging in other malignancies supports its use in detecting liver metastases from colorectal cancer and differentiating fibrosis from recurrent tumor after therapy for colorectal cancer; staging the axilla in primary breast cancer; staging melanoma and lymphoma; and staging and detecting recurrence of head and neck cancer. The initial reports on the use of FDG-PET are encouraging in its use in musculoskeletal malignancy, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid cancer.     

Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of breast cancer

Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) is a useful tool for acquisition of both glucose metabolic and anatomic imaging data using a single device in a single diagnostic session, and has opened a new field in clinical oncologic imaging. FDG-PET/CT has been used successfully for the diagnosis, initial staging, restaging, early treatment response assessment, evaluation of metastatic disease response, and prognostication of breast cancer as well as various malignant tumors. We herein review the current place and role of FDG-PET/CT in the management of breast cancer, focusing on its usefulness and limitations in the imaging of these patients.     

Lymph node staging with dual-modality PET/CT: enhancing the diagnostic accuracy in oncology

Lymph node staging according to the TNM criteria is an essential part of tumor evaluation. Several morphological and functional imaging procedures are used complementarily in this setting. Dual-modality PET/CT scanners are able to provide anatomical and functional data sets in a single session with accurate image co-registration. Comparative studies between morphological imaging procedures, such as MRI and CT, with co-registered PET/CT demonstrated significantly better lymph node staging with PET/CT than with anatomical procedures alone, regardless of the staged body compartment (head and neck, thorax or abdominal area). Based on more accurate staging results, PET/CT was able to alter the patients' therapy in a significant number of studies. Functional imaging with FDG-PET ([(18)F]-2-fluoro-2-desoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography) demonstrated outstanding results in lymph node staging of different tumor diseases. By adding anatomical information to PET, PET/CT outperforms PET alone when assessing the TNM-stage of different malignant diseases. This paper provides an overview concerning the performance of PET/CT in staging lymph nodes for malignant spread and points out benefits and limitations of this new imaging modality.     

Stellenwert der PET/CT zur Bildgebung des kolorektalen Karzinoms

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has emerged as a very useful imaging modality in the management of colorectal carcinoma. Data from the literature regarding the role of PET/CT in the initial diagnosis, staging, radiotherapy planning, response monitoring and surveillance of colorectal carcinoma is presented. Future directions and economic aspects are discussed. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and FDG-PET for colorectal cancer and endorectal ultrasound for rectal cancer. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Combined FDG-PET/CT. PERFORMANCE: While other imaging modalities allow superior visualization of the extent and invasion depth of the primary tumor, PET/CT is most sensitive for the detection of distant metastases of colorectal cancer. ACHIEVEMENTS: We recommend a targeted use of PET/CT in cases of unclear M staging, prior to metastasectomy and in suspected cases of residual or recurrent colorectal carcinoma with equivocal conventional imaging. The role of PET/CT in radiotherapy planning and response monitoring needs to be determined. Currently there is no evidence to support the routine use of PET/CT for colorectal screening, staging or surveillance. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: To optimally exploit the synergy between morphologic and functional information, FDG-PET should generally be performed as an integrated FDG-PET/CT with a contrast-enhanced CT component in colorectal carcinoma.     

FDG-PET delayed imaging for the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence after radio-chemotherapy: comparison with MRI/CT

In advanced head and neck cancer, an organ-sparing approach comprising radiation therapy combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy has become an important technique. However, the high incidence of residual masses after therapy remains a problem. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the use of 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) delayed imaging for the detection of recurrence of head and neck cancer after radio-chemotherapy, and compared the FDG-PET results with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Forty-three lesions from 36 patients with head and neck cancer suspected to represent recurrence after radio-chemotherapy (median interval from therapy, 4 months) were studied. PET was performed at 2 h after FDG injection, and evaluated. The results were compared to those of contrast studies with MRI or CT performed within 2 weeks of the PET study, and to histological diagnosis (in all patients suspected of having recurrence) or clinical diagnosis. The lesion-based sensitivity (visual interpretation) and negative predictive value of FDG-PET (88% and 91%, respectively) were higher than those of MRI/CT (75% and 67% respectively). The specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of FDG-PET (78%, 81% and 70%, respectively) were significantly (P<0.05) higher than those of MRI/CT (30%, 47% and 39% respectively). Three of six patients with false positive findings had post-therapy inflammation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that retrospective evaluation with the standardised uptake ratio yielded the best results (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 81.5%), followed by visual interpretation and then the tumour/neck muscle ratio. An FDG-PET delayed imaging protocol yielded significantly better results for the detection of recurrence of head and neck cancer after radio-chemotherapy than MRI/CT. Because of the high negative predictive value of FDG-PET (91.3%), if PET is negative, further invasive procedures may be unnecessary.     

From tumor biology to clinical PET: A review of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology

Cancer cells show increased metabolism of both glucose and amino acids, which can be monitored with 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG), a glucose analogue, and 11C-L-methionine (Met), respectively. FDG uptake is higher in fast-growing than in slow-growing tumors. FDG uptake is considered to be a good marker of the grade of malignancy. Several studies have indicated that the degree of FDG uptake in primary lung cancer can be used as a prognostic indicator. Differential diagnosis of lung tumors has been studied extensively with both computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET). It has been established that FDG-PET is clinically very useful and that its diagnostic accuracy is higher than that of CT. Detection of lymph node or distant metastases in known cancer patients using a whole-body imaging technique with FDG-PET has become a good indication for PET. FDG uptake may be seen in a variety of tissues due to physiological glucose consumption. Also FDG uptake is not specific for cancer. Various types of active inflammation showed FDG uptake to a certain high level. Understanding of the physiological and benign causes of FDG uptake is important for accurate interpretation of FDG-PET. In monitoring radio/chemotherapy, changes in FDG uptake correlate with the number of viable cancer cells, whereas Met is a marker of proliferation. Reduction of FDG uptake is a sensitive marker of viable tissue, preceding necrotic extension and volumetric shrinkage. FDG-PET is useful for the detection of recurrence and for monitoring the therapeutic response of tumor tissues in various cancers, including those of the lung, colon, and head and neck. Thus, PET, particularly with FDG, is effective in monitoring cancer cell viability, and is clinically very useful for the diagnosis and detection of recurrence of lung and other cancers.     

Radiotherapy planning: PET/CT scanner performances in the definition of gross tumour volume and clinical target volume

Purpose Positron emission tomography is the most advanced scintigraphic imaging technology and can be employed in the planning of radiation therapy (RT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible role of fused images (anatomical CT and functional FDG-PET), acquired with a dedicated PET/CT scanner, in delineating gross tumour volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) in selected patients and thus in facilitating RT planning.Methods Twenty-eight patients were examined, 24 with lung cancer (17 non-small cell and seven small cell) and four with non-Hodgkins lymphoma in the head and neck region. All patients underwent a whole-body PET scan after a CT scan. The CT images provided morphological volumetric information, and in a second step, the corresponding PET images were overlaid to define the effective target volume. The images were exported off-line via an internal network to an RT simulator.Results Three patient were excluded from the study owing to change in the disease stage subsequent to the PET/CT study. Among the remaining 25 patients, PET significantly altered the GTV or CTV in 11 (44%) . In five of these 11 cases there was a reduction in GTV or CTV, while in six there was an increase in GTV or CTV.Conclusion FDG-PET is a highly sensitive imaging modality that offers better visualisation of local and locoregional tumour extension. This study confirmed that co-registration of CT data and FDG-PET images may lead to significant modifications of RT planning and patient management.An erratum to this article can be found at     

Clinical significance of patterns of increased [<Superscript>18</Superscript>F]-FDG uptake in the thyroid gland: a pictorial review

In the diagnosis and staging of oncologic patients, [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is well recognized as an important functional imaging modality. FDG-PET also has been used for cancer screening in healthy individuals. In general, the normal thyroid gland shows absent or low uptake on FDG-PET, which is often identified as an incidental finding on PET. Today, thyroid FDG uptake can be seen in three patterns: diffuse; focal; and diffuse-plus-focal. Diffuse thyroid uptake is mainly considered an indicator of chronic thyroiditis. Focal thyroid uptake has been associated with malignancy (range 25–50%). Diffuse-plus-focal uptake is not well recognized and might also indicate a risk of malignancy. Understanding the patterns of thyroid FDG uptake is thus important for nuclear medicine physicians or radiologists when giving recommendations to the referring physician. In this pictorial review, we show the clinical significance of different patterns of thyroid uptake on FDG-PET [PET/computed tomography (CT)], including ultrasonography (US) findings.     

TNM staging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with primary head and neck cancer

Purpose PET/CT, PET+CT, and CT were compared concerning accuracies in TNM staging and malignancy detection in head and neck cancer. The impact of PET/CT compared to the other imaging modalities on therapy management was assessed. Materials and methods Fifty-five patients with suspected head and neck primary cancer underwent whole-body FDG-PET/CT. PET/CT and PET+CT were evaluated by a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist; CT was evaluated by two radiologists, PET by two nuclear physicians. Histopathology served as the standard of reference. Differences between the staging modalities were tested for statistical significance by McNemar’s test. Results Overall TNM-staging and T-staging with PET/CT were more accurate than PET+CT and CT alone (p < 0.05). PET/CT was marginally more accurate than CT alone in N-staging (p = 0.04); no statistically significant difference was found when compared to PET+CT for N-staging. PET/CT altered further treatment in 13 patients compared to CT only and in 7 patients compared to PET+CT. Conclusion Combined PET/CT proved to be partly more accurate in assessing the overall TNM-stage than CT and PET+CT. These results were based on a higher accuracy concerning the T-stage, mainly in patients with metallic implants and marginally the N-stage. Therapy decisions have been influenced in a substantial number of patients. PET/CT might be considered as a first line diagnostic tool in patients with suspected primary head and neck cancer.     

The impact of FDG-PET on the management algorithm for recurrent colorectal cancer.

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been successfully used to image colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluated the accuracy of 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose (FDG) PET for the detection and staging of recurrent CRC and the consequent impact on clinical management. Forty-two patients previously treated for CRC were investigated for suspected recurrence and, if recurrence was confirmed, the extent of disease was evaluated. All patients underwent whole-body FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) scan and results were compared to assess sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for each modality. We then assessed the FDG-PET directed alteration in clinical management from that planned on the basis of spiral CT results. FDG-PET was more sensitive (93%) than CT (73%) for detection of recurrence (specificity 58% and 75%, respectively). FDG-PET yielded a correct diagnosis in 35 (83%) out of 42 patients, while CT did so in 31 patients (74%). FDG-PET was more accurate than CT for staging local recurrence (sensitivity 100%, specificity 86% with FDG-PET vs 75% and 100%, respectively, with CT) and CRC liver metastases (sensitivity 100% vs 45%; specificity 100% for both). Overall, PET upstaged 8 out of 30 patients (27%) and altered patient management in 16 (38%) cases. This study confirms that FDG-PET is more sensitive than CT for the detection and staging of recurrent CRC. The results also indicate that FDG-PET is an accurate means of selecting appropriate patients for operative treatment. When applied to routine clinical practice, patient management is altered.     

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma: is it time to shift gears?

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has become a very useful technique for staging and monitoring therapy response in lymphoma, providing unique information about the biological behavior of disease. Increased fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in lymphoma is based on elevated glycolysis and longer residence time of FDG in malignant cells compared with most normal tissues. The metabolic information provided by this technique suggests that FDG-PET may be more sensitive than the anatomical imaging modalities. Computed tomography (CT) is the principal imaging modality for the staging and restaging of lymphoma. Nonetheless, this technique has significant shortcomings, particularly in the post-therapy setting. Gallium-67 scintigraphy has played an important role in monitoring response to therapy and follow-up of patients; however, the sensitivity of ⁶⁷Ga depends on the subtype of lymphoma and the size and location of disease. Published results strongly indicate that FDG-PET is superior to ⁶⁷Ga imaging and may be equal or superior to CT for the detection of nodal as well as extranodal involvement in lymphoma.     

Established, emerging and future applications of FDG-PET/CT in the uterine cancer

Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-[1?F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) is a useful technique to acquire both glucose metabolic and anatomic imaging data using a single device in a single diagnostic session and has opened a new field in clinical oncologic imaging. FDG-PET/CT has been used successfully for the staging, optimization of treatment, re-staging, therapy monitoring, and prognostic prediction of uterine cervical cancer and endometrial cancer as well as various malignant tumours. The present review discusses the current role of FDG-PET/CT in the management of uterine cancer, discussing its usefulness and limitations in the imaging of these patients.     

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging

Purpose

The aim of the study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and FDG PET/CT for breast cancer (BC) staging.

Methods

Twenty BC patients underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and 1.5-T DWI. Lesions with qualitatively elevated signal intensity on DW images (b?=?800 s/mm²) were rated as suspicious for tumour and mapped to individual lesions and different compartments (overall 552 lesions). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was determined for quantitative evaluation. Histopathology, MRI findings, bone scan findings, concordant findings between FDG PET/CT and DWI, CT follow-up scans and plausibility served as the standards of reference defining malignancy.

Results

According to the standards of reference, breasts harboured malignancy in 11, regional lymph nodes in 4, M1 lymph nodes in 3, bone in 7, lung in 2, liver in 3 and other tissues in 3 patients. On a compartment basis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of malignancies were 94, 99, 98, 97 and 98% for FDG PET/CT and 91, 72, 76, 50 and 96% for DWI, respectively. Of the lesions seen on DWI only, 348 (82%) turned out to be false-positive compared to 23 (11%) on FDG PET/CT. The average lesion ADC was 820?±?300 with true-positive lesions having 929?±?252 vs 713?±?305 in false-positive lesions (p?<?0.0001).

Conclusion

Based on these initial data DWI seems to be a sensitive but unspecific modality for the detection of locoregional or metastatic BC disease. There was no possibility to quantitatively distinguish lesions using ADC. DWI alone may not be recommended as a whole-body staging alternative to FDG PET(/CT). Further studies are necessary addressing the question of whether full-body MRI including DWI may become an alternative to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.     

Peritoneal tuberculosis with elevated serum CA125 mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis on F-18 FDG-PET/CT

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18 FDG-PET) plays an important role in differentiating benign from malignant tumors. However, some false-positive findings, such as tuberculosis, may occur. We report a case referred for F-18 FDG whole-body PET computed tomography (PET/CT) scan owing to an elevated serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125). An FDG-PET/CT scan showed multiple hypermetabolic foci in the mesentery and peritoneum with further increase of FDG uptake on the delayed scan, mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis. Subsequent laparoscopic biopsy showed granulomatous inflammation, and tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction showed a positive result. Serum CA125 returned to normal following treatment with anti-tuberculosis drugs. Peritoneal tuberculosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis in a tuberculosis endemic region.     

Analysis of various malignant neoplasms detected by FDG-PET cancer screening program: based on a Japanese Nationwide Survey

Objective

The most distinctive feature of FDG-PET cancer screening program is the ability to find various kinds of malignant neoplasms in a single test. The aim of this survey is to clarify the range and frequency of various malignant neoplasms detected by FDG-PET cancer screening performed in Japan.

Methods

“FDG-PET cancer screening” was defined as FDG-PET or positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scan with or without other tests performed for cancer screening of healthy subjects. This survey was based on a questionnaire regarding FDG-PET cancer screening. We analyzed the situation of 9 less frequently found malignant neoplasms including malignant lymphoma, malignancy of head and neck, esophagus, hepatobiliary and gallbladder, pancreas, kidney, cervical and uterine, ovary, and bladder.

Results

The detailed information of subjects with the suspected 9 kinds of malignant neoplasms mentioned above in the FDG-PET cancer screening program was studied in a total of 1,219 cases from 212 facilities. A statistical significance between PET/CT and PET was found in relative sensitivity and PPV for renal cell cancer. Malignant lymphoma was frequently of indolent type, suspected head and neck cancers had many false-positive results, and pancreatic cancer detected in this program was often in the advanced stage even in asymptomatic subjects. The recommendation of combined screening modality to PET or PET/CT was as follows: gastric endoscopy for assessing early esophageal cancer; abdominal ultrasound for screening hepatobiliary and gallbladder cancer; pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for assessing gynecological and pelvic cancers; and the CA125 blood test for screening ovarian cancer. Delayed image was helpful depending on the type of suspected malignant neoplasm.

Conclusion

We analyzed various types of malignant neoplasms detected by the FDG-PET cancer screening program and presented recommended combination of examinations to cover FDG-PET and PET/CT.     

FDG PET/MR for lymph node staging in head and neck cancer

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of PET/MR (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) with FDG (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose) for lymph node staging in head and neck cancer.

Materials and methods

This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee; all patients signed informed consent. Thirty-eight patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region underwent a PET scan on a conventional scanner and a subsequent PET/MR on a whole-body hybrid system after a single intravenous injection of FDG. The accuracy of PET, MR and PET/MR for lymph node metastases were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Histology served as the reference standard.

Results

Metastatic disease was confirmed in 16 (42.1%) of 38 patients and 38 (9.7%) of 391 dissected lymph node levels. There were no significant differences between PET/MR, MR and PET and MR (p > 0.05) regarding accuracy for cervical metastatic disease. Based on lymph node levels, sensitivity and specificity for metastatic involvement were 65.8% and 97.2% for MR, 86.8% and 97.0% for PET and 89.5% and 95.2% for PET/MR.

Conclusions

In head and neck cancer, FDG PET/MR does not significantly improve accuracy for cervical lymph node metastases in comparison to MR or PET.