Critical Role of Nutrition in Improving Quality of Care: An Interdisciplinary Call to Action to Address Adult Hospital Malnutrition

The current era of health care delivery, with its focus on providing high-quality, affordable care, presents many challenges to hospital-based health professionals. The prevention and treatment of hospital malnutrition offers a tremendous opportunity to optimize the overall quality of patient care, improve clinical outcomes, and reduce costs. Unfortunately, malnutrition continues to go unrecognized and untreated in many hospitalized patients. This article represents a call to action from the interdisciplinary Alliance to Advance Patient Nutrition to highlight the critical role of nutrition intervention in clinical care and to suggest practical ways to promptly diagnose and treat malnourished patients and those at risk for malnutrition. We underscore the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to addressing malnutrition both in the hospital and in the acute post-hospital phase. It is well recognized that malnutrition is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Although data vary across studies, available evidence shows that early nutrition intervention can reduce complication rates, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, mortality, and cost of care. The key is to systematically identify patients who are malnourished or at risk and to promptly intervene. We present a novel care model to drive improvement, emphasizing the following six principles: (1) create an institutional culture where all stakeholders value nutrition; (2) redefine clinicians' roles to include nutrition care; (3) recognize and diagnose all malnourished patients and those at risk; (4) rapidly implement comprehensive nutrition interventions and continued monitoring; (5) communicate nutrition care plans; and (6) develop a comprehensive discharge nutrition care and education plan.     

Critical Role of Nutrition in Improving Quality of Care

The current era of healthcare delivery, with its focus on providing high‐quality, affordable care, presents many challenges to hospital‐based health professionals. The prevention and treatment of hospital malnutrition offer a tremendous opportunity to optimize the overall quality of patient care, improve clinical outcomes, and reduce costs. Unfortunately, malnutrition continues to go unrecognized and untreated in many hospitalized patients. This article represents a call to action from the interdisciplinary Alliance to Advance Patient Nutrition to highlight the critical role of nutrition intervention in clinical care and to suggest practical ways to promptly diagnose and treat malnourished patients and those at risk for malnutrition. We underscore the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to addressing malnutrition both in the hospital and in the acute posthospital phase. It is well recognized that malnutrition is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Although data vary across studies, available evidence shows that early nutrition intervention can reduce complication rates, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, mortality, and cost of care. The key is to systematically identify patients who are malnourished or at risk and to promptly intervene. We present a novel care model to drive improvement, emphasizing the following 6 principles: (1) create an institutional culture where all stakeholders value nutrition, (2) redefine clinicians’ roles to include nutrition care, (3) recognize and diagnose all malnourished patients and those at risk, (4) rapidly implement comprehensive nutrition interventions and continued monitoring, (5) communicate nutrition care plans, and (6) develop a comprehensive discharge nutrition care and education plan.     

Malnutrition determined by the patient-generated subjective global assessment is associated with poor outcomes in acute stroke patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The extent of malnutrition in hospitalised stroke patients and its influence on outcomes including hospital complications, length of stay and discharge destination are important issues. The aim of this study was to determine the nutritional status of patients admitted to an acute stroke unit and the association between nutritional status and health outcomes. METHODS: Nutritional status was determined prospectively using the scored patient generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) in patients (n=73) admitted to an acute stroke unit within 48 h of admission to an Australian private hospital. Outcome data were collected by retrospective audit. RESULTS: On admission, 19.2% of patients were malnourished and this was associated with a significantly greater PG-SGA score (15 vs. 5) and lower body weight (59.8 kg vs. 75.8 kg) compared to well-nourished patients. In terms of health outcomes, malnourished patients had longer length of stay (13 vs. 8 days), increased complications (50% vs. 14%), increased frequency of dysphagia (71% vs. 32%) and enteral feeding (93% vs. 59%). No association was found between nutritional status and serum albumin level or discharge destination. CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition on admission to hospital after acute stroke is associated with poor outcomes including increased length of stay and increased prevalence of dysphagia and complications. The scored PG-SGA is a nutrition assessment tool that allows quick identification of malnourished stroke patients.     

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early screening and treatment of malnourished patients

BACKGROUND: About 25-40% of hospital patients are malnourished. With current clinical practices, only 50% of malnourished patients are identified by the medical and nursing staff. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report the cost and effectiveness of early recognition and treatment of malnourished hospital patients with the use of the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ). DESIGN: The intervention group consisted of 297 patients who were admitted to 2 mixed medical and surgical wards and who received both malnutrition screening at admission and standardized nutritional care. The control group consisted of a comparable group of 291 patients who received the usual hospital clinical care. Outcome measures were weight change, use of supplemental drinks, use of tube feeding, use of parenteral nutrition and in-between meals, number of consultations by the hospital dietitian, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The recognition of malnutrition improved from 50% to 80% with the use of the SNAQ malnutrition screening tool during admission to the hospital. The standardized nutritional care protocol added approximately 600 kcal and 12 g protein to the daily intake of malnourished patients. Early screening and treatment of malnourished patients reduced the length of hospital stay in malnourished patients with low handgrip strength (ie, frail patients). To shorten the mean length of hospital stay by 1 d for all malnourished patients, a mean investment of 76 euros (91 US dollars) in nutritional screening and treatment was needed. The incremental costs were comparably low in the whole group and in the subgroup of malnourished patients with low handgrip strength. CONCLUSIONS: Screening with the SNAQ and early standardized nutritional care improves the recognition of malnourished patients and provides the opportunity to start treatment at an early stage of hospitalization. The additional costs of early nutritional care are low, especially in frail malnourished patients.     

Nutrition au cours des radiothérapies et chimiothérapiesNutritional support during cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Nutritional support for cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy are strongly requested with regard to the frequent malnutrition at time of diagnosis. Furthermore, the malnutrition often progresses with adverse effects of therapy and disease progression. Nutritional screening and assessment are essential. Dietetic care is mandatory for patients with malnutrition or at risk of malnutrition when they are still able to eat. But this oral nutritional support is frequently unable to maintain sufficient nutritional intakes with regard to tumour effect or treatment toxicity. Enteral or parenteral nutrition must be provided to patients unable to absorb adequate quantity of nutrients for a prolonged period. The primary goal is to avoid, especially for malnourished patients, further nutritional degradation which can lead to treatment interruptions, complications or increased risk of death. Routine administration of artificial nutrition has been tested during radiotherapy and chemotherapy but results are conflicting and data are missing for severely malnourished patients. No benefits in terms of treatment toxicity, tumour response, risk of complications and finally mortality have been demonstrated for routine use of artificial nutrition. Most decisions for indication of nutritional support, route of administration and quality of artificial nutrition in this field can't rely today on evidence-based medicine. However, artificial nutrition can provide nutrients and hydration necessary to maintain comfort and to improve survival for patients unable to eat sufficient nutrition for a prolonged period.     

A Comprehensive Nutrition‐Focused Quality Improvement Program Reduces 30‐Day Readmissions and Length of Stay in Hospitalized Patients

Background: Although screening patients for malnutrition risk on hospital admission is standard of care, nutrition shortfalls are undertreated. Nutrition interventions can improve outcomes. We tested effects of a nutrition‐focused quality improvement program (QIP) on hospital readmission and length of stay (LOS). Materials and Methods: QIP included malnutrition risk screening at admission, prompt initiation of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) for at‐risk patients, and nutrition support. A 2‐group, pre‐post design of malnourished adults with any diagnosis was conducted at 4 hospitals: QIP‐basic (QIPb) and QIP‐enhanced (QIPe). Comparator patients had a malnutrition diagnosis and ONS orders. For QIPb, nurses screened all patients on admission using an electronic medical record (EMR)–cued Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST); ONS was provided to patients with MST scores ≥2 within 24–48 hours. QIPe had ONS within 24 hours, postdischarge nutrition instructions, telephone calls, and ONS coupons. Primary outcome was 30‐day unplanned readmission. We used baseline (January 1–December 31, 2013) and validation cohorts (October 13, 2013–April 2, 2014) for comparison. Results: Patients (n = 1269) were enrolled in QIPb (n = 769) and QIPe (n = 500). Analysis included baseline (n = 4611) and validation (n = 1319) comparator patients. Compared with a 20% baseline readmission rate, post‐QIP relative reductions were 19.5% for all QIP, 18% for QIPb, and 22% for QIPe, respectively. Compared with a 22.1% validation readmission rate, relative reductions were 27.1%, 25.8%, and 29.4%, respectively. Similar reductions were noted for LOS. Conclusions: Thirty‐day readmissions and LOS were significantly lowered for malnourished inpatients by use of an EMR‐cued MST, prompt provision of ONS, patient/caregiver education, and sustained nutrition support.     

Nutritional assessment and management in hospitalised patients: implication for DRG-based reimbursement and health care quality

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is associated with a higher morbidity resulting in an increased need for medical resources and economic expenses. In order to ensure sufficient nutritional care it is mandatory to identify the effect of malnutrition and nutritional care on direct cost and reimbursement. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the economic effect of a nutritional screening procedure on the identification and coding of malnutrition in the G-DRG system. METHODS: All G-DRG relevant parameters of 541 consecutive patients at a gastroenterology ward were documented. Moreover, all patients were screened for malnutrition by a dietician according to the subjective global assessment (SGA). Patients were then grouped into the appropriate G-DRG and the effective cost weight (CW) was calculated. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 541 patients (19%) were classified malnourished (SGA B or C). Recognition of malnutrition increase from 4% to 19%. Malnourished patients exhibited a significantly increased length of hospital stay (7.7+/-7 to 11+/-9, P<0.0001). In 26/98 (27%) patients, the coding of malnutrition was considered relevant by grouping and resulted in a rise of DRG benefit. Mean case mix value and patients' complexity and comorbidity level (PCCL) increased after including malnutrition in the codification (CV 1.53+/-2.9 to 1.65+/-2.9, P=0.001 and PCCL 2.69+/-1.4 to 3.47+/-0.82, P<0.0001). The reimbursement increase by 360/malnourished patient or an additional reimbursement of 35280 (8.3% of the total reimbursement for all patients of 423186). Nutritional support in a subgroup of 50 randomly selected patients resulted in additional costs of 10268 . Forty-four of these patients (86%) were classified malnourished (32 SGA B and 12 SGA C). However, the subsequent reimbursement covered only approximately 75% of the expenses (7869), but did not include the potential financial benefits resulting from clinical interventions. CONCLUSION: Malnourished patients can be detected with a structured assessment and documentation of nutritional status and this is partly reflected in the G-DRG/ICD 10 system. In addition to increasing direct health care reimbursement, nutritional screening and intervention has the potential to improve health care quality.     

Characteristics and Outcomes of Adult Inpatients With Malnutrition

Background

The diagnosis of malnutrition remains controversial. Furthermore, it is unknown if physician diagnosis of malnutrition impacts outcomes. We sought to compare outcomes of patients with physician diagnosed malnutrition to patients recognized as malnourished by registered dietitians (RDs), but not physicians, and to describe the impact of each of 6 criteria on the diagnosis of malnutrition.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients identified as meeting criteria for malnutrition. Pediatric, psychiatric, maternity, and rehabilitation patients were excluded. Patient demographics, clinical data, malnutrition type and criteria, nutrition interventions, and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record.

Results

RDs identified malnutrition for 291 admissions during our study period. This represents 4.1% of hospital discharges. Physicians only diagnosed malnutrition on 93 (32%) of these cases. Physicians diagnosed malnutrition in 43% of patients with a body mass index <18.5 but only 26% of patients with body mass index higher than 18.5. Patients with a physician diagnosis had a longer length of stay (mean 14.9 days vs 7.1 days) and were more likely to receive parenteral nutrition (PN) (20.4% vs 4.6%). Of the patients, 62% had malnutrition due to chronic illness. Of the 6 criteria used to identify malnourished patients, weight loss and reduced energy intake were the most common.

Conclusions

Malnutrition is underrecognized by physicians. However, further research is needed to determine if physician recognition and treatment of malnutrition can improve outcomes. The most important criteria for identifying malnourished patients in our cohort were weight loss and reduced energy intake.     

Addressing Malnutrition in Hospitalized Adults

Established guidelines and standardized protocols exist to assist clinicians in effectively addressing disease‐related malnutrition in hospitalized adults. The goals of this treatment vary according to the disease state and the severity of the malnutrition. In starvation‐related malnutrition, the goal of nutrition therapy is to restore healthy levels of lean body mass and body fat. For chronic disease‐related malnutrition, the goals of treatment are to maintain and improve lean body mass and body fat. In acute‐disease‐related malnutrition, the goals of nutrition therapy are to support vital organ function and preserve the host response through the acute episode. The success of addressing malnutrition in hospitalized patients depends not just on the nutrition therapy selected, but also on the timely and appropriate application of guidelines and protocols by the clinicians dedicated to caring for malnourished patients. Coordination of nutrition care among providers is highly desirable, and usually includes a multidisciplinary team of clinicians typically comprising a physician, nurse, dietitian, and pharmacist. For greatest success, this attention to recognizing and addressing malnutrition begins at admission and continues beyond discharge to the community. When addressing malnutrition in hospitalized patients, oral feeding through diet enrichment or oral nutrition supplementation (ONS) is the first line of defense. ONS has consistently been demonstrated to provide nutrition, clinical, functional, and economic benefits to malnourished patients in both individual trials and meta‐analyses. In an era when the cost of healthcare is rising as the population ages, addressing malnutrition in hospitalized patients is an important priority.     

Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system

Malnutrition is a debilitating and highly prevalent condition in the acute hospital setting, with Australian and international studies reporting rates of approximately 40%. Malnutrition is associated with many adverse outcomes including depression of the immune system, impaired wound healing, muscle wasting, longer lengths of hospital stay, higher treatment costs and increased mortality. Referral rates for dietetic assessment and treatment of malnourished patients have proven to be suboptimal, thereby increasing the likelihood of developing such aforementioned complications. Nutrition risk screening using a validated tool is a simple technique to rapidly identify patients at risk of malnutrition, and provides a basis for prompt dietetic referrals. In Australia, nutrition screening upon hospital admission is not mandatory, which is of concern knowing that malnutrition remains under-reported and often poorly documented. Unidentified malnutrition not only heightens the risk of adverse complications for patients, but can potentially result in foregone reimbursements to the hospital through casemix-based funding schemes. It is strongly recommended that mandatory nutrition screening be widely adopted in line with published best-practice guidelines to effectively target and reduce the incidence of hospital malnutrition.     

The facilitated early enteral and dietary management effectiveness trial in hospitalized patients with malnutrition

Background: The prevalence of malnutrition in the hospitalized setting is 30% to 55%. Previous studies reported an association of malnutrition with an increased hospital length of stay (LOS), morbidity, and mortality of patients. This study evaluated the role of early nutrition intervention on LOS, diagnosis coding of malnutrition cases, calculating case mix index, and reducing delays in implementing nutrition support to patients. Methods: Demographic data, anthropometric measurements, LOS, and serum albumin levels were collected from 400 patients in 2 medical wards to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and potential delays in nutrition consultation. Based on these results, a nutrition intervention study was conducted in 1 ward; the other ward served as a control. Patients were classified as normally nourished or malnourished. Multivariate general linear regressions were used to reveal the impact of intervention on the change in LOS, controlling for other potential confounding factors on the cohort and a subset with severe malnutrition. Results: Of the 400 patients assessed, 53% had malnutrition. Multiple general linear regressions showed that nutrition intervention reduced LOS an average of 1.93 days in the cohort group and 3.2 days in the severe malnourished group. Case mix index and female gender were positively associated with LOS in the malnourished group. Nutrition intervention reduced the delays in implementing nutrition support to patients by 47%. Conclusions: Results highlight the positive impact of nutrition intervention in terms of reduced LOS in malnourished hospital patients. Reduction in LOS with diagnosis coding of malnutrition cases yielded substantial economic benefits.     

Nutritional status and length of stay in patients admitted to an Acute Assessment Unit

BACKGROUND: The Redesigning Care initiative at Flinders Medical Centre aimed to improve access to timely, consistent, quality care. This led to the creation of an Acute Assessment Unit (AAU) where all patients are assessed by the Allied Health team on admission. This study aimed to: (i) determine the nutritional status of patients admitted to the AAU using the scored Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA); and (ii) determine the association between nutritional status and length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted in 64 patients (mean age 79.9 +/- 11 years, 76% female). Nutritional status was assessed within 48 h of admission and LOS data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: According to PG-SGA global rating, 53% (n = 34) of patients were malnourished. There was a weak association between PG-SGA score and LOS (r = 0.250, P = 0.046). The malnourished patients had a longer LOS by 1 day compared to well-nourished patients, and while this did not reach statistical significance (Z = -0.988, P = 0.323), it has implications for health care costs. LOS overall was short at a median of 4.5 days (range 1-24). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients admitted to the AAU is malnourished. There was a trend for these patients to have a longer LOS, indicating a critical need for nutritional management; however LOS as a whole was short. While nutrition support in hospital is useful in reinforcing dietary education, the short LOS emphasized the importance of discharge education and follow-up.     

Creating a clinical nutrition registry: prospects, problems, and preliminary results

There is a tremendous gap in the information available to support the practice of hospital-based dietitians and to address the issue of how the risk of developing protein-energy malnutrition can be avoided in the majority of patients. This article describes the rationale and benefits of creating a nutrition registry of within-hospital clinical nutrition care. A nutrition registry is made up of observational data, collected on an ongoing basis, of nutritional interventions provided to hospitalized patients. It is the first step in data gathering to demonstrate the effectiveness of clinical nutrition interventions. The methods and preliminary results of a nutrition registry that was established at The University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, III, are presented. Using subjective global assessment, 55% (257 of 467) of patients at admission and 60% (280 of 467) of patients at discharge were moderately or severely malnourished. Patients that were normal nourished at admission and became moderately or severely malnourished had higher hospital charges ($40,329 for moderately malnourished patients, $76,598 for severely malnourished patients) than those that remained normal nourished ($28,368). This pattern held independent of admission nutritional status. Major challenges in implementation of a registry into the responsibilities of the staff dietitian are reviewed. The conclusion of this study is that nutrition registries can be established and will provide the much needed baseline data to document the impact of nutrition interventions on outcomes of medical care.     

A Review of Nutrition Support Guidelines for Individuals with or Recovering from COVID-19 in the Community

COVID-19 negatively impacts nutritional status and as such identification of nutritional risk and consideration of the need for nutrition support should be fundamental in this patient group. In recent months, clinical nutrition professional organisations across the world have published nutrition support recommendations for health care professionals. This review summarises key themes of those publications linked to nutrition support of adults with or recovering from COVID-19 outside of hospital. Using our search criteria, 15 publications were identified from electronic databases and websites of clinical nutrition professional organisations, worldwide up to 19th June 2020. The key themes across these publications included the importance in the community setting of: (i) screening for malnutrition, which can be achieved by remote consultation; (ii) care plans with appropriate nutrition support, which may include food based strategies, oral nutritional supplements and referral to a dietitian; (iii) continuity of nutritional care between settings including rapid communication at discharge of malnutrition risk and requirements for ongoing nutrition support. These themes, and indeed the importance of nutritional care, are fundamental and should be integrated into pathways for the rehabilitation of patients recovering from COVID-19.     

Identifying Geriatric Patients at Risk for Malnutrition: A Quality Improvement Project

Abstract

Malnourishment leads to poor outcomes in the geriatric surgical population and national guidelines recommend preoperative nutrition screening. However, care practices do not reflect current recommendations. As a quality-improvement project, a validated nutritional screening tool, the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), was implemented in the preoperative clinic of a large academic health center to identify patients at-risk for malnutrition prior to elective surgery. Patients were screened during the nursing intake process and categorized as no nutritional risk; at-risk for malnourishment; or severely malnourished. During the four-week screening period, 413 patients met inclusion criteria with 67.8% (n?=?280) screened. No nutritional risk was identified in 77.5% (n?=?215) of patients, 18.2% (n?=?51) were at-risk, and 4.3% (n?=?12) were malnourished. This project will inform and guide a prehabilitation plan for nutrition optimization to improve healthcare quality, outcomes, and costs in the geriatric surgical population.     

A critical appraisal of the usefulness of perioperative nutritional support.

Preoperative malnutrition is often associated with poor postoperative outcome, yet there is no consensus about whether perioperative nutritional support reduces postoperative complications to the level occurring in well-nourished patients undergoing similar procedures. This is partly because reports evaluating effect of perioperative nutritional support on postoperative outcome vary widely in number of patients studied, primary diagnosis, and duration and quality of perioperative nutritional support. These concerns warrant caution in interpreting reported results, even of randomized studies. However, analysis of published reports suggests that when total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is given to malnourished patients in adequate amounts for greater than or equal to 7-15 d preoperatively, significant improvements in both nutritional status and postoperative clinical outcome are likely to occur. Preoperative total enteral nutrition (TEN) is as effective as TPN in improving postoperative clinical outcome. Postoperative TPN, TEN, and ad libitum oral nutrition are equally effective in reducing postoperative complications. Potential candidates for surgery for whom prompt initiation of preoperative TPN or TEN may reduce operative morbidity and mortality irrespective of nutritional status can be identified on admission.     

Addressing Disease‐Related Malnutrition in Healthcare

Alarmingly high rates of disease‐related malnutrition have persisted in hospitals of both emerging and industrialized nations over the past 2 decades, despite marked advances in medical care over this same interval. In Latin American hospitals, the numbers are particularly striking; disease‐related malnutrition has been reported in nearly 50% of adult patients in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, and Uruguay. The tolls of disease‐related malnutrition are high in both human and financial terms—increased infectious complications, higher incidence of pressure ulcers, longer hospital stays, more frequent readmissions, greater costs of care, and increased risk of death. In an effort to draw attention to malnutrition in Latin American healthcare, a feedM.E. Latin American Study Group was formed to extend the reach and support the educational efforts of the feedM.E. Global Study Group. In this article, the feedM.E. Latin American Study Group shows that malnutrition incurs excessive costs to the healthcare systems, and the study group also presents evidence of how appropriate nutrition care can improve patients' clinical outcomes and lower healthcare costs. To achieve the benefits of nutrition for health throughout Latin America, the article presents feedM.E.'s simple and effective Nutrition Care Pathway in English and Spanish as a way to facilitate its use.