Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section

AIM: To identify parturients at risk of inability to extend labor epidural analgesia in whom alternative methods of anesthesia should be considered for Cesarean section (CS). METHODS: For 6 months, we prospectively studied women undergoing CS with a functioning epidural catheter in place from the delivery ward. All parturients received the same epidural protocol: bolus of bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl, followed by bupivacaine 0.1% and fentanyl (2 microg/ml) 10-15 ml/h and an additional 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.125% as top-up according to patient request. Sixteen milliliters of lidocaine 2%, 1 ml of bicarbonate and 100 microg of fentanyl were given for CS. Failed epidural analgesia was defined as the need to convert to general anesthesia. RESULTS: Of the 101 parturients studied, 20 (19.8%) required conversion to general anesthesia. In univariate analysis, the likelihood of failed epidural anesthesia was inversely correlated with parturient age (P = 0.014) and directly correlated with pre-pregnancy weight (P = 0.019), weight at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.003), body mass index at the end of pregnancy (P = 0.0004), gestational week (P = 0.008), number of top-ups (P = 0.0004) and visual analog scale (VAS) score 2 h before CS (P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, the number of top-ups in the delivery ward was the best predictor of epidural anesthesia failure (odds ratio, 4.39; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Younger, more obese parturients at a higher gestational week, requiring more top-ups during labor and having a higher VAS score in the 2 h before CS are at risk for inability to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for CS.     

Determination of the analgesic dose–response relationship for epidural fentanyl and sufentanil with bupivacaine 0.125% in laboring patients

Study Objective: To establish the analgesic effective doses as defined as a visual analog pain scale (VAS) of at least 10 for 95% of parturients (ED₉₅) receiving either epidural fentanyl or sufentanil with bupivacaine 0.125% for labor analgesia.

Design: Double-blind, randomized controlled study.

Setting: Two tertiary-care teaching hospitals.

Patients: 100 female patients, at full-term pregnancy, in active early labor (<5 cm cervical dilation) and requesting obstetric anesthesia services for labor analgesia.

Interventions: Patients were randomized and equally distributed to receive one of ten epidural dosing regimens of bupivacaine 0.125% alone or with either fentanyl 25, 50, 75, or 100 μg or sufentanil 5, 10, 15, 20, or 25 μg in a 10-ml bolus after a 3-ml test dose of bupivacaine 0.25%.

Measurements and Main Results: VAS scores were obtained from each parturient using a 10-cm plastic VAS slide rule at times 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes, and then again when the patient requested additional analgesia. Analgesic duration and demographic and obstetric data also were obtained. Using a log-probit dose–response analysis, analgesic success as defined as a VAS of at least 10 with each opioid dose was plotted and an ED₉₅ value of 8 μg and 50 μg was established for sufentanil and fentanyl, respectively, in bupivacaine 0.125%. No statistical difference was detected for analgesic duration or incidence of side effects between analgesic groups.

Conclusions: Epidural analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil in bupivacaine 0.125% behaves in a dose–response fashion allowing for the determination of equipotent dose of each.     

罗哌卡因复合芬太尼用于可行走硬膜外分娩镇痛的可行性

目的 探讨0．075％罗哌卡因或布比卡因与芬太尼2μg/ml的混合液用于可行走硬膜外分娩镇痛的可行性。方法 60例初产妇随机分为三组：A组（n＝20）0．075％罗哌卡因＋芬太尼2μg/ml;B组（n＝20）0．075％布比卡因＋芬太尼2μg/ml;C级（n＝20）为对照组。采用双盲法进行视觉模拟疼痛评分（VAS）和行走功能的评定。记录各组产妇的生命体征、胎心率（FHR）、产程时间、分娩方式、催产素用量以及新生儿Apgar评分和脐静脉血气分析,并测定用药前和宫口开全时母体血清皮质醇浓度。结果 A、B两组产妇均获得良好镇痛效果,镇痛后A组所有产妇均能下床行走和自主排尿,而B组仅70％产妇能下床行走和自主排尿,两组比较有显著性差异（P＜0．05）;A、B两组第一产程末血清皮质醇浓度明显低于C组（P＜0．05）。产程时间、分娩方式和新生儿Apgar评分各组间均无差异（P＞0．05）。结论 0．075％罗哌卡因和芬太尼2μg/ml的混合液有效安全地用于可行走硬膜外分娩镇痛。     

Effect of intravenous versus epidural fentanyl on the minimum local analgesic concentration of epidural bupivacaine in labor

BACKGROUND: The minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) has been defined as the median effective local analgesic concentration (EC50) in a 20-ml volume for epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor. The aim of this study was to determine the relative local anesthetic sparing efficacies of intravenous and epidural fentanyl by comparison of their effects on the MLAC of bupivacaine. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, prospective study, 84 parturients at < or = 7-cm cervical dilation who requested epidural analgesia were allocated to one of two groups. After lumbar epidural catheter placement, 20 ml bupivacaine (n = 44) or bupivacaine with 3 microg/ml (60 microg) fentanyl (n = 40) was administered. The plain bupivacaine group then received 60 microg intravenous fentanyl. The bupivacaine-fentanyl group received intravenous saline. The concentration of bupivacaine was determined by the response of the previous patient in that group to a higher or lower concentration using up-down sequential allocation. Analgesic efficacy was assessed using 100-mm visual analog pain scores, with < or = 10 mm within 30 min define as effective. RESULTS: The MLAC of bupivacaine-intravenous fentanyl was 0.064% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.049-0.080), and the MLAC of bupivacaine-epidural fentanyl was 0.034% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.017-0.050). Epidural fentanyl significantly increased the analgesic potency of bupivacaine by a factor of 1.88 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.67) compared with intravenous fentanyl. The epidural fentanyl group demonstrated significantly higher dermatomal spread (P = 0.0064) and increased pruritus (P = 0. 01). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural fentanyl significantly reduced the MLAC of bupivacaine when compared with intravenous fentanyl for the parturients in this study. The significantly enhanced local anesthetic sparing, dermatomal level, and pruritus with epidural fentanyl suggest a primarily spinal site of action.     

Regional analgesia in early active labour: combined spinal epidural vs. epidural

We randomly allocated 93 women in early active labour and requesting epidural analgesia to receive either epidural ( n  = 48) or combined spinal–epidural analgesia ( n  = 45). For epidural analgesia 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.1% with 75 μg of fentanyl were injected into the epidural space. For combined spinal–epidural analgesia 1 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% with 25 μg of fentanyl were injected into the subarachnoid space. For both groups subsequent top-ups of 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 20 μg were given using a lightweight patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump with a lockout time of 30 min. We assessed analgesia and the degree of motor blockade and found no significant differences in pain or maternal satisfaction scores between the two groups. The time to first top-up was significantly longer in the epidural group than in the CSE group (p = 0.01). The combined spinal–epidural group had significantly greater motor blockade at 30 min than the epidural group (p = 0.01), but there was no difference after this. The PCEA machine failed completely twice and temporarily many times. We conclude that the combined spinal–epidural technique confers no advantages in early active labour. Also, a lightweight PCEA pump needs to be more reliable before we can recommend its use.     

腰麻联合双管硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床效果

目的评估腰麻联合双管硬膜外分娩镇痛的效果及对母婴的影响。方法 2015年4月至2016年1月于本院要求分娩镇痛的初产妇129例,随机分为两组。D组(n=68)腰麻后双管硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛,S组(n=61)腰麻后单管硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛。记录镇痛前(T0)及镇痛后10min(T1)、30 min(T2)、120 min(T3)、宫口开至7~8 cm(T4)、宫口开全(T5)、第二产程用力分娩时(T6)的VAS疼痛评分,各产程时间及缩宫素使用情况,镇痛泵按压及镇痛药物使用情况,分娩方式,产时出血量,新生儿情况和镇痛不良反应。结果 T0~T4时两组VAS评分差异无统计学意义,T5、T6时D组VAS评分明显低于S组(P0.05)。镇痛泵有效按压次数及镇痛药物使用量两组差异无统计学意义,但镇痛泵总按压次数D组明显少于S组(P0.05)。各产程时间、缩宫素使用率、分娩方式、产时出血量、新生儿情况和镇痛不良反应两组差异均无统计学意义。结论腰麻联合双管硬膜外分娩镇痛效果确切,不良反应少,产妇满意度高,对母婴是安全的。     

Comparison of combined spinal epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section

BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia (EA) is popular for cesarean section, but has some drawbacks such as incomplete block, inadequate muscle relaxation and delayed onset. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) has gained increasing interest as it combines the reliability of a spinal block and the flexibility of an epidural block. We investigated the efficacy of CSEA that combines the main spinal and the supporting epidural anesthesia, comparing with pH-adjusted EA, for cesarean section. METHODS: Sixty-four pregnant women at full term were divided into two groups. Patients in the CSEA group (n=32) were given 1.5-1.6 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally, followed by 10 ml of 0.25% plain bupivacaine through the epidural catheter 10 min later. Patients in the EA group (n=32) received 20-25 ml of 2% lidocaine which was already mixed with 0.1 ml of 0.1% epinephrine, 100 g of fentanyl and 1.5 ml of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The quality and side effects of surgical anesthesia, neonatal state, and postoperative course were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the EA group, 22% (7 cases) complained of intraoperative pain but none in the CSEA group (P=0.011). Muscle relaxation and motor block were much better in the CSEA group (P<0.001 and P=0.011 each). Significantly more women in the EA group had shivering (P=0.001). They also had more nausea and vomiting but the differences were not significant. Not only the time to T4 block (9.7 vs. 18.3 min, mean, P<0.001) but also the stay in the postanesthesia care unit, recovery of sensory and motor block and start of postoperative pain were all significantly shorter in the CSEA group. No one in either group had postdural puncture headache (PDPH). CONCLUSION: We can conclude that, when combining the main spinal and the supporting epidural anesthesia, CSEA has greater efficacy and fewer side effects than the pH-adjusted EA in cesarean sections.     

Patient-controlled epidural technique improves analgesia for labor but increases cesarean delivery rate compared with the intermittent bolus technique

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor (PCEA) provides better analgesia and satisfaction than the intermittent bolus technique (bolus) without affecting the mode of delivery. METHODS: We randomized 187 parturients to receive labor analgesia using either the PCEA or bolus technique. The PCEA group received a starting bolus of 14 mg of bupivacaine and 60 micro g of fentanyl in a 15-ml volume, followed by a background infusion (bupivacaine 0.08% and fentanyl 2 microg ml(-1)) 5 ml h(-1) with a 5-ml bolus and 15-min lock-out interval. The bolus group received boluses of 20 mg of bupivacaine and 75 micro g of fentanyl in a 15-ml volume. RESULTS: Parturients in the PCEA group had significantly (P < 0.05-0.01) less pain during the first and second stages of labor. There was no difference in the spontaneous delivery rate between the groups, but the cesarean delivery rate was significantly (P < 0.05) higher (16.3% vs. 6.7%) in the PCEA group than in the bolus group. Bupivacaine consumption was significantly (P < 0.01) higher (11.2 mg h(-1) vs. 9.6 mg h(-1)) and the second stage of labor was significantly (P < 0.01) longer (70 min vs. 54 min) in the PCEA group than in the bolus group. Patient satisfaction was equally good in both groups. CONCLUSION: The PCEA technique provided better pain relief. This was associated with higher bupivacaine consumption, prolongation of the second stage of labor, and an increased rate of cesarean section.     

布比卡因、罗哌卡因与芬太尼不同配伍用于连续术后硬膜外镇痛安全性探讨

目的探讨布比卡因、罗哌卡因与芬太尼不同配伍用于连续术后硬膜外镇痛的效果、并发症及安全陛。方法1600例行连续术后硬膜外镇痛的患者,按所用镇痛药物配伍不同分为：0．1％布比卡因＋5μg／ml芬太尼组（B组,n=920）和0．2％罗哌卡因＋2μg／ml芬太尼组（R组,n=680）。对两组镇痛效果（视觉模拟评分及患者对镇痛效果的满意度）、并发症和处理措施进行总结分析。结果视觉模拟评分两组无差异（P〉0．05）。患者对镇痛的满意度R组明显高于B组（P〉0．05）。并发症的发生率B组高于R组（P〉0．05）。两组内年龄≥60岁的患者低血压的发生率高于年龄〈60岁者（P〈0．05）;女性患者恶心呕吐的发生率高于男性（P〈0．05）;腰段硬膜外镇痛患者下肢乏力或麻木的发生率明显高于胸段硬膜外镇痛患者（P〈0．05）。结论布比卡因、罗哌卡因与芬太尼不同配伍均可安全有效地用于连续术后硬膜外镇痛,罗哌卡因组并发症较少,并发症的发生与镇痛药物、年龄、性别及硬膜外置管部位有关。     

Anesthetic quality during cesarean section following subarachnoid or epidural administration of bupivacaine with or without fentanyl

Background: It is often assumed that subarachnoid administration of local anesthetics produces a more profound blockade than epidural anesthesia. Furthermore, the addition of fentanyl has been reported to increase preferentially intraoperative analgesia. In the present study we set out to study these two issues in a randomized and controlled study with respect to perceived pain and discomfort during surgery and postoperative pain. Methods: In the present study, 100 parturients subjected to elective cesarean section, 34 nullipara and 66 multipara, received one out of four combinations of the local anesthetic bupivacaine and the opioid fentanyl; group A - bupivacaine 12.5 mg+10 μg fentanyl subarachnoidally, group B - bupivacaine 12.5 mg+saline subarachnoidally, group C - bupivacaine 100 mg+100 μg fentanyl epidurally, group D - bupivacaine 100 mg+saline epidurally; N=25 in each group. Pain intensity and discomfort during surgery was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Postoperative pain intensity and need for analgesics postoperatively, ketobemidone, was registered for 24 h following surgery. Results: Intraoperative pain intensity and discomfort did not differ significantly between parturients in any of the four groups. Postoperative pain was significantly more intense in parturients receiving local anesthetics subarachnoidally as compared to the epidural groups during the first 6-h period. This difference was also reflected in a significantly increased consumption of analgesics during this period. No significant differences between the groups were observed with regard to hemo-dynamics (blood pressure), respiration (oxygen saturation) or other effects such as nausea or itching. All neonates had normal Apgar and neonatal adaptive capacity scores (NACS). Conclusion: We conclude that subarachnoidal (12.5 mg) and epidural (100 mg) injections with bupivacaine both produced adequate anesthetic quality in women undergoing elective cesarean section. The addition of fentanyl (10 μg subarachnoidally or 100 μg epidurally) did not significantly improve the quality of these already profound blockades.     

The clinical effectiveness of epidural bupivacaine, bupivacaine with lidocaine, and bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of bupivacaine alone and in combination with lidocaine or fentanyl for epidural analgesia during labor. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Labor and delivery unit at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Forty-five primiparas requesting epidural analgesia. INTERVENTIONS: Following epidural placement at L3-4 interspace, patients received either bupivacaine 0.5% (Group 1, n = 15), bupivacaine 0.25% with lidocaine 1% (Group 2, n = 15), or bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl 50 micrograms in 10 ml of saline (Group 3, n = 15). Patients in Groups 1 and 2 received 6 to 10 ml of local anesthetic depending on patient height, while patients in Group 3 received 5 ml of local anesthetic plus 50 micrograms of fentanyl in 10 ml of saline. All solutions contained epinephrine 1:200,000. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were assessed at regular intervals following administration of the epidural solution. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to measure onset of analgesia, time to complete pain relief, duration of analgesia, and patient satisfaction with therapy. The frequency of shivering and pruritus and the extent of sensory/motor block also were evaluated. There were no intragroup differences in time to complete pain relief or patient satisfaction. However, patients in Group 3 noted the most rapid onset and longest duration of pain relief. Patients in Group 3 also experienced significantly less shivering and had the lowest degree of motor block. Two patients in Group 3 experienced mild pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: Epidurally administered fentanyl safely extended the duration of labor analgesia while reducing bupivacaine dose requirements and magnitude of motor block. In this setting, the combination of bupivacaine and lidocaine offered no clinical advantage over bupivacaine alone.     

程控硬膜外间歇脉冲注入与持续背景输注用于分娩镇痛的比较

目的比较程控硬膜外间歇脉冲注入(programmed intermittent epidural bolus,PIEB)和持续背景输注(CEI)两种模式联合PCEA用于分娩镇痛的临床效果。方法自愿接受分娩镇痛足月、单胎和头位初产妇200例,随机分为两组,每组100例。在宫口扩张2~3 cm时采用硬膜外阻滞行分娩镇痛。PIEB组背景输注剂量为8 ml/h,给药速度为6 ml/min,每小时给药一次;CEI组以8ml/h的速度持续给药。观察产妇镇痛前(T0)、镇痛后10 min(T1)、30 min(T2)、1 h(T3)、2 h(T4)、宫口开全时(T5)、分娩时(T6)、分娩后1 h(T7)BP、VAS评分、改良Bromage评分;PCEA追加次数、罗哌卡因、舒芬太尼的用量、宫缩情况、胎心率、产程时间、镇痛时间、分娩方式、产妇使用催产素、不良反应、新生儿Apgar评分、产妇满意度评分。结果 T4~T6时PIEB组VAS评分明显低于CEI组(P0.01)。PIEB组PCEA追加次数、药物用量明显少于CEI组(P0.05),PIEB组产妇满意度明显高于CEI组(P0.05)。两组产妇的血压、宫缩持续时间和间隔时间、胎心率、产程、镇痛时间、分娩方式、使用催产素比例、不良反应发生率及新生儿Apgar评分差异无统计学意义。结论与采用CEI+PCEA模式比较,PIEB+PCEA模式的PCEA追加率更低、用药量更少、VAS评分更低、产妇的满意度更高,而不良反应并没有增加。     

The effect of intrathecal epinephrine on epidural infused analgesics during labor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order to prolong labor analgesia, one may add intrathecal epinephrine to the combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the addition of intrathecal epinephrine would lessen the requirement for a rescue dose of epidural analgesia during labor. METHODS: One hundred-eight parturients randomly received intrathecal bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 microgram with epinephrine 100 microgram (Group BFE) or without (Group BF). Analgesia was assessed by visual analogue pain score (VAPS) 15 and 30 minutes after drug administration. Then, epidural analgesia (0.1% bupivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl and 1:250,000 epinephrine at 10 mL/h) was initiated. If the patient requested additional analgesia and VAPS was over 30 mm, we added 8 mL epidural bupivacaine 0.125%. The requirement for additional analgesia, the incidence of motor block assessed by a modified Bromage score, hypotension, nausea, and pruritus was noted. RESULTS: Except for 3 parturients in Group BF, satisfactory analgesia was achieved in all parturients 30 minutes after intrathecal drug administration. Following 30 minutes of intrathecal drug administration, VAPSs (mean +/- SD) were 0 +/- 4 mm in Group BFE and 4 +/- 11 mm in Group BF. The number of patients who required additional labor analgesia in Group BFE (11 patients, 20%) was significantly less than in Group BF (26 patients, 48%) (P =.003). The incidence of motor block 30 minutes after spinal analgesia in Group BFE (12 patients, 22%) was significantly higher than in Group BF (3 patients, 6%) (P =.024). Nausea and pruritus were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of epinephrine to intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl lessened the requirement for additional epidural analgesia without increasing hypotension, nausea, or pruritus. However, the incidence of motor block may be increased without labor prolongation.     

Continuous epidural infusion of alfentanil and bupivacaine for labor and delivery

The purpose of this study was to compare alfentanil and fentanyl used in combination with bupivacaine in a continuous infusion epidural technique during labor and delivery. Thirty nine ASA I parturients had epidural analgesia induced with 0.25% bupivacaine and were then assigned in a randomized double-blind fashion to receive a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine containing either 5 micro/ml of alfentanil or 2 micro/ml of fentanyl at a rate of 10 ml/h. Analgesia assessed by visual analog scores was significantly better during both stage I and stage II of labor in the group receiving alfentanil. No significant maternal or neonatal side-effects were demonstrated.     

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor: the addition of clonidine to bupivacaine-fentanyl

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural clonidine has not been evaluated as a component of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) solutions during labor. A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and side effects of PCEA using bupivacaine and fentanyl, with or without clonidine. METHODS: Seventy-five healthy parturients in active labor were assigned to a PCEA solution of 0.0625% bupivacaine and fentanyl 2 microg/mL (4 mL demand bolus, 15 min lockout), with or without clonidine 4.5 microg/mL. The primary outcome measure was parturient rating of analgesia; others assessments included pain scores, drug utilization, supplementation and side effects. RESULTS: Thirty-one parturients received clonidine (group BFC) and 38 received control solution (group BF). Eight (6 group BF, 2 group BFC, P = .28) failed to achieve satisfactory epidural analgesia. There was a trend for parturient ratings of pain relief to be higher in group BFC, with significantly more reporting excellent first-stage analgesia (81% v. 57%, P<.05). Pain scores were similar. Clonidine (median dose, 28 microg/h) reduced total bupivacaine and fentanyl use (P<.01), and reduced supplementation (P<.01). Maternal blood pressure (BP) and recordings of systolic BP below 100 mm Hg did not differ. Group BFC had higher sedation scores (P<.01), but no one appeared oversedated. Shivering was reduced in group BFC (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of clonidine to epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl for PCEA in labor improved analgesia, reduced the supplementation rate, and reduced shivering. Increased sedation and lower BP were not clinically important.     

罗哌卡因与丁哌卡因硬膜外麻醉剖宫产的药效学比较

目的 将新型酰胺类局部麻醉药罗哌卡因的的药效学与丁哌卡因进行比较。方法 选择行择期剖宫产的产妇２０例,分成两组进行硬膜外麻醉。随机在硬膜外注入０．７５％罗哌卡因。对镇平面及达到最高平面和最低平面所用时间,运动阻滞程度及恢复时间,术中镇痛效果,新生儿Ａｐｇａｒ评分,不良反应的发生情况,血压和心率的变化进行观察。．     

Extending low-dose epidural analgesia in labour for emergency Caesarean section - a comparison of levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl

Women in labour receiving epidural analgesia with 15 ml bupivacaine 0.1% and 2 microg.ml(-1) fentanyl followed by 10-15-ml top-ups as required, who needed Caesarean section, were randomly allocated to receive 20 ml levobupivacaine 0.5% over 3 min with either 75 microg fentanyl (1.5 ml) or 1.5 ml saline. Further top-ups or inhaled or intravenous supplementation were given for breakthrough pain. Time to onset (loss of cold sensation to T4 and touch sensation to T5 bilaterally), quality of analgesia and side-effects were recorded. The study was stopped after 112 patients had been randomly assigned, due to a unit protocol change, from midwife-administered top-ups to patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Data from 51 patients given fentanyl and 54 given saline were available for analysis. There were no significant differences in onset times or supplementation between the groups, but there was more intra-operative nausea/vomiting with fentanyl (53%) than with saline (18%; p = 0.004). We found no advantage of adding fentanyl to epidural levobupivacaine when extending epidural analgesia in women already receiving epidural fentanyl during labour and there was an increased incidence of intra-operative nausea and vomiting. Power analysis suggested the same conclusion even had the study proceeded to completion.     

Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: low-dose epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl

To determine the acceptability of epidural bupivacaine-induced sixth thoracic (T6) sensory blockade and the analgesic efficacy of epidural fentanyl 50 microg, 24 parturients undergoing elective caesarean section were given a test dose of lidocaine 60 mg plus epinephrine followed by 10 ml of either 0.5 % bupivacaine (control group) or 0.5 % bupivacaine plus 50 microg fentanyl (fentanyl group) in a randomized double-blind manner. Fifteen minutes later loss of pinprick sensation was determined. Additional local anaesthetic was titrated to achieve T6 sensory blockade. Intraoperative pain intensity was assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS); total dose of bupivacaine and need for i.v. rescue fentanyl were recorded. The incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritus were documented. Mean (+/- SD) volume of bupivacaine was 14.1 +/- 3.05 ml versus 13 +/- 1.48 ml for the control and fentanyl groups respectively. The most severe intraoperative VAS for pain was significantly (P=0.023) lower in the fentanyl group (0.4 +/- 0.08 cm) than in the control group (3.1 +/- 0.3 cm). Rescue fentanyl was administered in 40% and 0% of patients in the control and fentanyl groups respectively. The incidence of side-effects was unaffected by treatment group. Apgar scores were similar in the two groups. We conclude that following administration of 10-15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 50 microg, T6 sensory blockade is associated with good intraoperative analgesia without obvious maternal or neonatal respiratory depression.     

Advantage of ropivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia following leg orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND: Epidural administration of local anesthetics may lead to effective pain relief. However, tachyphylaxis or other problems following prolonged epidural anesthesia may develop and in many cases difficulties exist in the maintenance of the similar degree of sensory blockade. The present study was therefore performed to investigate the analgesic effect of continuous postoperative epidural infusion of ropivacaine with fentanyl in comparison with that of bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone. METHODS: After leg orthopedic surgery with lumbar combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, thirty-six patients were randomized to one of the three postoperative epidural infusion groups: bupivacaine 0.125%, ropivacaine 0.2%, or ropivacaine 0.2% with 2.2 microg x ml(-1) (400 microg x 180 ml(-1)) of fentanyl. Continuous epidural infusion was started at a rate of 6 ml x h(-1) with possibility of an additional bolus injection of 3 ml at least every 60 min. Pain was assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) just before and 15 min after epidural bolus injections, and 15-20 h after the start of continuous epidural infusion as the severe at pain through the observation. The spread of analgesia (loss of sharpness in pinprick perception) and motor block (Bromage scale) were evaluated bilaterally. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were also measured. RESULTS: The epidural bolus infusion was associated with a significant decrease of VAS (P < 0.001) and stable blood pressure and heart rate in all groups. The maximal VAS in patients receiving 0.2% ropivacaine+fentanyl was significantly less compared to that in the other two groups. The regression of sensory blockade was significantly prolonged in patients treated with ropivacaine+fentanyl. There was no significant difference in the spread of sensory analgesia between 20 min and 15-20 h after the continuous epidural anesthesia in this group. None of the patients developed adverse effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and pruritis. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural injection of ropivacaine with fentanyl decreased postoperative pain with stable vital signs in patients undergoing leg orthopedic surgery, as compared to bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone, possibly because of the maintenance of sensory blockade by ropivacaine and enhancement of this sensory blockade by fentanyl.     

硬膜外不同输注模式用于分娩镇痛的比较

目的 比较规律间断硬膜外泵注（RIEB）和持续性硬膜外输注（CEI）复合病人自控硬膜外镇痛（PCEA）用于分娩镇痛的效果。方法 自愿接受分娩镇痛的初产妇225例,按照随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,每组75例。所有产妇给予硬膜外分娩镇痛,选取L2~3间隙行硬膜外穿刺,镇痛液配方为0.08%罗哌卡因＋0.4 μg/mL舒芬太尼。A组产妇予以CEI模式镇痛,8 mL/h持续输注镇痛液。B组与C组产妇予以RIEB模式镇痛,自注射首剂开始,每间断1 h给予8 mL镇痛液,其中B组的注射速度为2 mL/min,C组的注射速度为6 mL/min。记录产妇满意度评分,镇痛前（T1）、镇痛后30 min（T2）、1h（T3）、宫口开大7~8 cm时（T4）、宫口开全时（T5）、分娩时（T6）的平均动脉压（MAP）、心率（HR）、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）和改良Bromage评分,观察病人自控硬膜外镇痛（PCEA）有效按压次数、罗哌卡因用量、舒芬太尼用量、产程、镇痛时间、分娩方式、新生儿Apgar评分、不良反应发生情况、产妇满意度评分。结果 三组产妇T1~T3时点VAS评分无统计学差异（P>0.05）;三组产妇T4~T6时点VAS评分,PCEA追加次数,罗哌卡因用量,舒芬太尼用量方面均显示C组B组>A组（P<0.05）;三组患者的平均动脉压,心率,改良Bromage评分,产程,镇痛时间,分娩方式,不良反应发生率,新生儿Apgar评分无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 RIEB复合PCEA用于分娩镇痛的效果显著,且泵注速度为6 mL/min的效果最佳,可有效减少PCEA追加次数,罗哌卡因用量和舒芬太尼用量,提高产妇满意度,而不良反应并没有增加。