Previous hepatitis B virus infection is associated with worse disease stage and occult hepatitis B virus infection has low prevalence and pathogenicity in hepatitis C virus‐positive patients

Abstract: Background: Anti‐hepatitis C virus (anti‐HCV) patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) frequently show markers of previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Moreover, they may carry occult HBV infection. These features might influence clinical and biochemical features as well as stage of disease. Aim: To assess the prevalence and clinical associations of previous (positivity for anti‐HBs and/or anti‐HBc antibodies) and occult HBV infection (positivity for HBV‐DNA by nested‐PCR) in the serum of anti‐HCV‐positive, HCV‐RNA‐positive, HBsAg‐negative patients with various degrees of CLD seen at a tertiary referral centre. Patients: A total of 119 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (84 chronic hepatitis and 35 liver cirrhosis). Results: Forty‐eight patients (40.3%) showed markers of previous HBV infection. This feature was more frequent (P = 0.02) among cirrhotics (57%) as compared to chronic hepatitis patients (33%). Chronic hepatitis patients positive for markers of previous HBV infection had worse histology as compared to negative ones (grading: 6.4 ± 2.7 versus 4.6 ± 3.0, P = 0.004; staging: 1.6 ± 1.2 versus 1.0 ± 1.0, P = 0.01). Eight patients were positive for HBV‐DNA in serum (6.7%). No difference in the presence of occult HBV infection was seen between various degrees of liver disease (7.1% of chronic hepatitis, 5.7% of cirrhosis) and among patients who were positive (10.4%) or negative (4.2%) for markers of previous HBV infection. No significant biochemical, virological, or histological difference was observed between age, age at infection, duration of infection, marker patterns of previous HBV infection‐matched HBV‐DNA‐positive and negative chronic hepatitis patients. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that previous HBV infection among anti‐HCV patients is associated with worse disease stage. In these patients, the prevalence of occult HBV infection is low and there is no difference in distribution among patients with or without markers of previous HBV infection. Furthermore, it does not seem to be associated with disease stage. Lastly, at least among patients with chronic hepatitis, it does not seem to affect the severity of disease.     

Characteristics and outcome of patients with dual hepatitis B and C‐associated hepatocellular carcinoma: are they different from patients with single virus infection?

Background: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) caused by dual hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection may constitute a distinct disease group that is different from patients with single virus infection. This study compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HBV, HCV and dual virus infection. Methods: A prospective database of 1215 HCC patients with chronic hepatitis B, C or dual virus infection was investigated. Results: Patients with HCV infection (n=388) were significantly older (mean age, 69 years) than patients with dual virus (n=75, 65 years) and HBV (n=752; 60 years) infection (P<0.0001). The male‐to‐female ratios for the HBV, dual virus and HCV groups were 5.2, 3.4 and 1.3 respectively (P<0.0001). Patients in the HBV group more often had higher total tumour volume (mean, 409 cm³) than those in the dual virus group (244 cm³) and HCV (168 cm³) group (P<0.0001). No significant differences of the severity of liver cirrhosis, performance status, cancer staging and tumour cell differentiation were noted among the three groups. Patients in the HCV group had a significantly poor survival in comparison with the HBV group only in the subset of patients with small tumour volume (<50 cm³) in the Cox proportional hazards model (relative risk, 1.44; P=0.041). Conclusions: Dual HBV and HCV virus infection does not accelerate the speed of HCC formation in patients with chronic hepatitis B, and appears to have a modified course of carcinogenesis pathway that is diverted away from the biological behaviour of HBV and HCV infection.     

Outcome of hepatitis B and C virus‐associated hepatocellular carcinoma occurring after renal transplantation

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are subjected to immunosuppressive therapy that can enhance hepatitis B and C virus replication, leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and outcome of HCC in KTR. Case‐control study. Patients with chronic HBV and/or HCV infection who underwent kidney transplantation between 1976 and 2011 and subsequently developed HCC were compared to a control group of patients with chronic HBV and/or HCV infection, matched for gender and age at HCC diagnosis, who did not receive kidney transplantation. Among 2944 KTR, 330 had hepatitis B and/or C. Fourteen developed HCC, a period prevalence of 4.2%. Age at HCC diagnosis was 52.6 ± 6.5 years (53.5 ± 5.7 in controls, P=.76). Time between transplantation and HCC diagnosis was 16.7 ± 2.7 years. Six HCCs were related to HBV, six to HCV and two to co‐infection with HBV and HCV. Immunosuppressive therapy was comparable in HBV, HCV and HBV+HCV patients. At diagnosis, 71% of patients met Milan criteria (65% in the control group, P=.4). Alpha‐fetoprotein levels, tumour characteristics and treatment modalities were comparable between both groups. Patient survival 2 years after HCC diagnosis was 28% in KTR, compared to 68% in controls (P=.024). Survival after HCC diagnosis is significantly worse in KTR compared to nontransplanted patients with HBV and/or HCV. Prevention is crucial and should be based on viral eradication/suppression before or after transplantation.     

Associations between antibody to hepatitis B core antigen positivity and outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing hepatic resection

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the effect of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAb) positivity on clinical outcomes after hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis C virus antibody (HCVAb), termed non‐B, non‐C HCC (NBNC‐HCC), or with HCV‐related HCC.

Methods

Two hundred and sixty‐three patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC and measurements of HBsAg, HCVAb, and HBcAb were enrolled in this study.

Results

The percentages of HBcAb positivity were 52.3% (n = 57) and 56.9% (n = 66) in patients with NBNC‐ and HCV‐related HCC, respectively. The proportion of multiple NBNC‐HCCs was significantly greater in patients with HBcAb positivity compared to HBcAb negativity (P = 0.028). There were no significant differences in the recurrence‐free and overall survival rates between NBNC‐HCC patients with HBcAb positivity versus negativity (P = 0.461 and P = 0.190, respectively). Furthermore, for HCV‐related HCC patients, there were no significant differences in the baseline factors between patients with positive versus negative HBcAb. The proportion of patients with HBcAb‐positive HCV‐related HCC who underwent anatomical resection of the liver was significantly greater than that of HBcAb‐negative patients, whereas the recurrence‐free and overall survival rates were not significantly different (P = 0.158 and P = 0.191, respectively).

Conclusion

In our study, the presence of HBcAb had no impact on surgical outcomes after hepatic resection in patients with NBNB‐ and HCV‐related HCC. Occult HBV infection might be associated with hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with NBNC‐related HCC.     

Des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, alpha-fetoprotein and AFP-L3 in patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common complication in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Detection of HCC at an early stage is critical for a favorable clinical outcome. The study aim was to: (i) compare the levels of des‐γ‐carboxyprothrombin (DCP), α‐fetoprotein (AFP) and AFP‐L3 in HCC patients and in chronic viral hepatitis patients without HCC; (ii) define the level of each tumor marker with the best sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis; and (iii) to correlate the levels of these markers with respect to size and tumor burden. Methods: Two hundred and forty patients with either hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were studied. These included 144 with HCC, 47 with chronic hepatitis (fibrosis stage I–III on liver biopsy) and 49 with cirrhosis. Results: Levels of DCP, AFP and AFP L‐3 were significantly higher in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (P ≤ 0.0001). Receiver–operating curves (ROC) indicated that the cut‐off value with the best sensitivity and specificity for each test was ≥84 mAU/mL for DCP, ≥25 ng/mL for AFP and ≥10% for AFP‐L3. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for DCP was 87%, 85% and 86.8%, for AFP 69%, 87% and 69.8%, and for AFP‐L3 56%, 90% and 56.1%, respectively. DCP levels were below the ROC cut‐off in all patients without HCC. In patients with single lesions, there was a direct correlation of DCP to tumor size. High levels of AFP correlated with diffuse type of HCC. All three markers were significantly elevated in the presence of metastatic HCC. No advantage was observed by combining two or three markers for HCC diagnosis. Conclusion: DCP had the highest sensitivity and PPV for HCC diagnosis, had a direct correlation with tumor size, and was not elevated in any patients without HCC. DCP should be used as the main serum test for HCC detection.     

Influence of anti‐HBc seropositivity on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV‐infected patients after adjusting for confounding factors

Summary. It is controversial whether past hepatitis B virus infection constitutes an additional risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The incidence of HCC between 1994 and 2004 was analysed among 1262 patients who were only positive for HCV. The cumulative incidence of HCC was assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis and the difference between two groups was assessed by the log‐rank test. The effect of anti‐HBc positivity on the risk of HCC was assessed with multivariate Cox proportional analysis. Anti‐HBc was positive in 522 (41.4%) patients. The proportion of male patients (56.7 vs 46.8%, P < 0.001) and mean age (60.8 vs 56.9 years, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the anti‐HBc positive group. HCC developed in 339 patients (mean follow‐up 7.0 years), with cumulative incidence rates at 3, 5 and 10 years of 12.7, 24.5 and 41.9% in the anti‐HBc positive group and 10.6, 17.7 and 33.4% in the negative group, respectively (P = 0.005). However, anti‐HBc seropositivity did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis including age and gender (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85–1.31; P = 0.63). Anti‐HBc positivity and HCC incidence were confounded by male gender and older age.     

Clinical and histological impact of previous hepatitis B virus infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Background: Recent reports suggest that hepatitis C virus (HCV) carriers with serological markers of prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have more advanced liver fibrosis, irrespective of HBV‐DNA detection. Aims: We sought to assess the prevalence and impact of previous HBV infection in patients with HCV chronic infection. Methods: This cross‐sectional study included hepatitis B surface antigen‐ and human immunodeficiency virus‐negative subjects with positive HCV‐RNA. All patients had prior parenteral exposure as the probable source of HCV infection. Serum samples were tested for HBV‐DNA using a commercial assay. The METAVIR system was used for histological analysis. Results: One‐hundred and eleven patients were evaluated. Thirty‐one out of 111 patients (28%) tested positive for antihepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc). HBV‐DNA was not detected in any sample. Anti‐HBc‐positive patients showed higher histological grading, staging and a higher fibrosis progression rate. By multivariate analysis, anti‐HBc‐positivity was predictive of moderate to severe activity [odds ratio (OR)=3.532; P=0.032] and significant hepatic fibrosis (OR=3.364; P=0.017). After approximately 20 years of infection, advanced liver fibrosis (F3/F4) can be expected in 13% of anti‐HBc‐negative subjects who acquired HCV before the age of 30 and in 57% of those anti‐HBc‐positive patients who were infected by HCV after 30 years of age (P<0.001). Conclusion: Previous HBV infection is common among HCV carriers and may exert a negative impact on the natural history of HCV infection, independently of the presence of significant HBV replication.     

Surveillance factors change outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma due to chronic hepatitis C virus infection in New Zealand

Although surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with 6 monthly imaging is recommended for patients with cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, international studies report poor adherence and there is paucity of data on its effect on patient outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to review cases of HCC secondary to HCV to determine the impact of adherence with HCC surveillance on survival. A total of 520 patients with confirmed HCC secondary to chronic HCV from 31 January 2001 to 31 May 2018 were identified from a prospective national HCC database. Computerized clinical records, general practitioner referral letters and secondary care clinic letters were subsequently retrospectively analysed for methods of HCC detection. HCC was detected through routine surveillance in only 224 patients (44%). HCC was detected either incidentally or following the onset of symptoms in nonadherent (12%), suboptimal surveyed (3%), undiagnosed cirrhotic (12%) or recently diagnosed HCV patients (21%) or were never offered surveillance (2%). Routine surveillance improved overall survival, OR 0.41 (95% CI [0.32, 0.53], P < .0001), with an overall mean survival of 91.5 months (95% CI 76.4, 106.6) compared to 43.0 (95% CI 34.2, 51.9) for those patients not receiving regular surveillance Outcome following diagnosis of HCC secondary to chronic HCV is determined by early detection when curative intervention is possible. Lack of diagnosis of HCV and nonadherence to HCC surveillance results in late diagnosis and poor outcomes. Under‐diagnosis of HCV infection and lack of diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients known to have HCV infection reduce the benefit of current HCC surveillance strategies.     

Clinical significance of antibody against hepatitis B virus core antigen in patients with hepatitis C virus‐related hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose: We investigated the unsettled issue of whether seropositivity for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc) affects characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Antibody status was determined by enzyme immunoassay in 243 patients with this cancer, and associations with clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome were analysed. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was determined by real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Results: Of 235 patients with unequivocal serologic status, 142 were seropositive and 93 were seronegative. Clinicopathologic characteristics and overall cumulative survival rates were comparable between the two groups. However, seropositivity tended to predict poor outcome for patients in Child class B or C (P=0.068), those in tumour‐nodes‐metastasis‐based stage 3 or 4 (P=0.081), those with tumours exceeding 25 mm (P=0.068), and those with a past history of clinical liver disease (P=0.088). Multivariate analysis identified serum albumin, portal vein tumour thrombosis, and tumour size as independent determinants of survival. Serum HBV DNA was below 1.7 log copies/ml in all 40 patients tested. Conclusions: Overall, the clinical features of HCV‐HCC were unaffected by seropositivity for anti‐HBc. Seropositivity tended to worsen prognosis for subgroup with poor hepatic reserve or advanced tumours.     

Surveillance programme for hepatocellular carcinoma improves the survival of patients with chronic viral hepatitis

Background: The survival benefit of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. Aim: We aimed to examine the survival benefit of HCC surveillance in chronic viral hepatitis. Methods: Survivals of HCC patients related to chronic viral hepatitis from the Hepatology Clinic (surveillance group) were compared with those referred from other hospitals/clinics (no‐surveillance group). Lead‐time and length‐time biases were adjusted based on tumour volume doubling times. Results: Among 579 patients (91% hepatitis B), 472 (82%) patients had HCC and 79 (17%) of these patients were referred from the surveillance programme. HCC was smaller (4.2 vs. 7.7 cm; P<0.001) and fewer in numbers (2.6 vs. 3.8, P=0.03) in the surveillance group vs. the no‐surveillance group. Treatment by surgery (20 vs. 10%, P=0.007) and local ablative therapy (46 vs. 19%, P<0.001) were more frequent in the surveillance group than that in the no‐surveillance group. The median survival of the surveillance group (88 weeks) was significantly longer than that of the no‐surveillance group (26 weeks) (P<0.001). The adjusted cumulative survival at 2 years was significantly longer in the surveillance group if the tumour volume doubling time was <90 days (P=0.0352). Conclusions: HCC surveillance can improve the survival of patients with chronic viral hepatitis B.     

Annexin A2 as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma in Egyptian patients

AIM To investigate the clinical utility of serum annexin A2(ANXA2) as a diagnostic marker for early hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS This study was performed in HCC Clinic of Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt and included: Group 1: Fifty patients with early stage HCC(Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A); Group 2: Twenty five patients with chronic liver disease; and Control Group: Fifteen healthy, age-and sex-matched subjects who were seronegative for viral hepatitis markers. The followinglaboratory investigations were done: Viral hepatitis markers [hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus(HCV) antibodies], HCV RNA in HCV antibody-positive patients, serum alpha fetoprotein(AFP), and serum ANXA2 levels.RESULTS In this study, 88% of HCC patients(n = 44) were HCVpositive, while HBV infection represented only 8% of all HCC patients(n = 4); and two patients were negative for both viral markers. A highly significant difference was found between patients with HCC and chronic liver disease as well as controls with regard to serum ANXA2 levels(130, IQR 15-240; 15, IQR 15-17; and 17, IQR 15-30 ng/m L, respectively). The area under the curve of ANXA2 was 0.865; the cut-off value was established to be 18 ng/mL with a diagnostic sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 88%, while the sensitivity and specificity of AFP at the cut-off value of 200 ng/dL were 20% and 100%, respectively.CONCLUSION Serum ANXA2 may serve as a biomarker for the early detection of HCC.     

HCV and HBV coexist in HBsAg-negative patients with HCV viraemia: Possibility of coinfection in these patients must be considered in HBV-high endemic area

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and is highly associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Korea. The role of HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HCC patients who are negative for hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg) remains poorly defined. It has been suggested that HCV core protein may impair the polymerase activity of HBV in vitro, potentially lowering HBV titre in coinfected patients. Therefore, routine enzyme immunoassay may not detect HBV, in spite of the presence of HBV viraemia in low titres. The aim of this study was to confirm the coexistence of HBV viraemia in hepatitis C-infected patients with HCC who have apparent HBsAg seronegativity and to establish the need for clinical reinterpretation of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) serological tests of HBsAg in patients with HCV viraemia and HCC. The serological profiles of HBV and HCV in 616 patients with HCC were analysed and the coinfection rate of HCV and HBV investigated. Sera were obtained from 16 patients who were both anti-HCV and HCV-RNA positive but HBsAg negative, and tested for HBV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Eleven non-A and non-B chronic hepatitis patients without HCC who had the same profiles of anti-HCV, HCV-RNA, and HBsAg were tested for HBV by PCR. As a control group, sera were obtained from 15 patients with HCC and 30 non-A and non-B chronic hepatitis patients without HCC; both were anti-HCV, HCV-RNA, and HBsAg negative and tested for HBV PCR. Of the 616 patients with HCC, 450 (73.1%) had current HBV infection, 48 (7.8%) had anti-HCV antibodies, and nine (1.5%) had viral markers of both HCV and HBV by serological profiles. Of the 27 patients with HCV viraemia and HBsAg seronegativity (16 with HCC; 11 with non-A non-B chronic hepatitis), 14 (51.9%) showed HBV viraemia by PCR. In contrast, of the 75 patients in the control group (45 with HCC; 30 with non-A and non-B chronic hepatitis) who were both HCV PCR negative and HBsAg negative, five (11.1%) showed HBV viraemia by PCR. The PCR for HBV revealed coexistent HBV viraemia in HCV viraemia patients, despite HBsAg negativity by EIA. In HBV-endemic areas, the possibility of coinfection of HBV in HBsAg-negative patients with HCV viraemia should be considered and molecular analysis for HBV-DNA performed.     

National Survey of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Heavy Drinkers in Japan

Background: The major cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the general Japanese population is an infection related to hepatotropic viruses, especially hepatitis virus C (HCV). Even in heavy drinkers, the major cause of HCC is HCV infection. However, HCC without viral infection has been reported in heavy drinkers. Alcohol has been also reported to be associated with an increased risk of cancer. In this study, we investigated aspects of HCC pathogenesis in heavy drinkers in Japan. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 1350 hospitals authorized by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. The questionnaires asked about the number of inpatients with the different types of alcoholic liver diseases, admitted to each hospital between 1998 and 2001. Results: The percentage of heavy drinkers among all admitted patients with liver diseases or liver cirrhosis was approximately 15%. Of the patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, the cirrhosis was derived from alcohol alone in 61% and from alcohol plus a virus in 39% of patients. Furthermore, the percentage of patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis caused by alcohol alone and who did not have HCC was 80%. However, the percentage of HCC patients who tested negative for viral hepatitis serum markers was 27% of the total number of heavy drinkers admitted for HCC. A study mainly on liver cirrhosis performed in the early 1990s demonstrated that the alcohol‐alone group accounted for 44% of admitted patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and 18% of heavy drinkers admitted for HCC. Conclusions: Because the consumption of alcohol is increasing in Japan, the frequency and number of cases of alcoholic liver cirrhosis are increasing. Viral hepatitis infection, however, still plays an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis in heavy drinkers. Radiographical examination is recommended even in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis who test negative for serum markers of viral hepatitis.     

Detection of serum hepatitis B, C, and D viral nucleic acids and its implications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

The association of viremia, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and hepatocyte inflammatory activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients was studied. Serum samples from 114 HCC patients undergoing surgery were assayed for hepatitis B, C, and D viral nucleic acids by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) prior to surgery. Of these patients, 65 had HBV infection alone, 15 had HCV infection alone, 4 had HDV infection, 20 had HBV and HCV superinfection, 1 had triple viral infection, and 9 were negative for HBV and HCV infections. The prevalence of active viral replication was significantly higher in HCV than in HBV (92% versus 70%; P = 0.006) patients, and significantly higher mean serum ALT levels were also noted in the HCV group than in the HBV group (P = 0.02). The incidence of marked ALT elevation (>200 U/l) was highest in the HCV (27%) and the HDV (25%) groups. Patients in the HCV group were 10 years older than those in the HBV group. Viral superinfection did not accelerate the development of HCC. Viral replication persisted in a significant portion of HCC patients and a higher prevalence of hepatic inflammation was noted in patients with HCV- and, possibly, HDV-related HCC. (Received Sept. 22, 1997; accepted Dec. 19, 1997)     

Impact of viral hepatitis aetiology on survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma: A large multicentre cohort study

While HBV and HCV are risk factors for HCC, uncertainty exists as to whether these viral infections have prognostic significance in HCC. Thus, we compared the overall survival of patients with HBV, HCV and nonviral HCC, and evaluated whether the presence of HBV and HCV predicts patient outcomes. We conducted a multicentre study of HCC cases diagnosed at six Melbourne tertiary hospitals between Jan 2000‐Dec 2014. Patient demographics, liver disease and tumour characteristics and patient outcomes were obtained from hospital databases, computer records and the Victorian Death Registry. Survival outcomes were compared between HBV, HCV and nonviral hepatitis cases and predictors of survival determined using Cox proportional hazards regression. There were 1436 new HCC cases identified including 776 due to viral hepatitis (HBV 235, HCV 511, HBV‐HCV 30) and 660 from nonviral causes. The median survival of HBV, HCV and nonviral HCC patients was 59.1, 28.4 and 20.9 months, respectively (P<.0001). On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for survival included HCC aetiology, gender, BCLC stage, serum AFP, total number and size of lesions, and serum creatinine and albumin. After adjusting for these and method of detection, HBV remained an independent predictor of improved overall survival when compared to both nonviral (HR 0.60%, 95% CI 0.35‐0.98; P=.03) and HCV‐related HCC (HR 0.51%, 95% CI 0.30‐0.85; P=.01). In this large multicentre study, HBV is independently associated with improved overall survival compared with HCV and nonviral‐related HCC. Further studies are needed to determine the underlying factor(s) responsible.     

各型肝炎病毒单纯及重叠感染的研究

目的 探讨病毒性肝炎患者甲～戊，庚型肝炎病毒(HAV-HEV，HGV)单纯感染及重叠感染情况。方法 采用EIA法检测病毒性肝炎患者血清抗-HAV IgM，HBV标志物、抗-HCV IgM、抗-HDV IgM、抗-HEV IgM、抗-HGV IgM。结果 共检测210例病毒性肝炎患者HAV-HEV、HGV血清标志物，20例未检出(9．5％)，190例患者检出标志物阳性(90．5％)。HBV感染率89，5％(188／210，其中有34例为既往感染，占16．2％，现症感染154例，占73．3％)；HAV感染率29．0％(61／210)，HCV、HDV感染率均为8．1％(17／210)、HEV、HGV感染率依次为10．0％(21／210)、7．1％(15／210)。各临床类型中单纯感染占61．4％(129／210)，二重感染占32．4％(68／210)，以HAV HBV、HBV HDV、HBV HEV感染模式最常见，三重感染占6．2％(13／210)，以HAV HBV HDV感染模式最常见；临床上以肝炎肝硬化、重型肝炎重叠感染常见，急性肝炎最少见。结论 病毒性肝炎中HBV感染最常见，其次为HAV感染；单纯感染、二重感染多见，三重感染少见；重叠感染发生率随病情加重而增加。     

De novo hepatitis B virus infection in hepatocellular carcinoma following eradication of hepatitis C virus by interferon therapy

Epidemiological studies have revealed that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still observed in hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐positive patients with a sustained response to interferon (IFN) treatment, although a substantial decrease in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been achieved in those patients. Why HCC develops in patients who have a complete clearance of HCV remains unclear. Here, we provided evidence of latent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in an initially HCV‐positive chronic hepatitis patient who developed HCC after the complete eradication of HCV by IFN therapy. Although he was initially negative for anti‐hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or circulating HBV DNA but positive for anti‐hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc) in his sera, he developed HBsAg and HBV DNA during the course of the management of a series of cancers. HBV DNA was detectable in the liver tissues before HBV reactivation and the viral sequences derived from his anti‐HBc‐positive liver showed 100% homology to that from the serum after HBsAg appearance. These findings indicates that HCV‐positive individuals who are positive for anti‐HBc in the absence of HBsAg could have latent HBV infection in their liver tissues and intrahepatic HBV infection may play a pivotal role in the development of HCC after the IFN‐mediated eradication of HCV.     

Clinical Features and Outcome of Chronic Viral Hepatitis with Acute Exacerbation in Patients with Concurrent Infections of Hepatitis B and C Virus

Background/Aims: Studies have shown that concurrent infection of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus may be associated with severe forms of chronic liver disease or with rapid progression. However, very little is known about the role and course of concurrent HBV and HCV infection in patients with acute viral hepatitis. Methods: This study retrospectively compared the clinical features of 83 patients diagnosed with HBV- or HCV-related chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation (12 with concurrent HBV and HCV infection, 46 with HBV infection alone, and 25 with HCV infection alone) encountered at Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, between January 2003 and December 2005. Results: The clinical course of chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation in patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infection is similar to patients with single HBV infection, and more severe than patients with single HCV infection, evidenced by increased hepatic decompensation (P = 0.05), failure (P = 0.036), and mortality (P = 0.036). Elevated serum HCVRNA-negative percentage in HBVDNA-positive patients and low serum HBVDNA concentrations in HCVRNA-positive patients imply reciprocal interference of HBV and HCV in patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infections during acute-phase hepatitis. In patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infection, the mortality rate for detectable HBVDNA patients seemed higher than that for undetectable HBVDNA patients, although it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.066). Conclusions: virus interference existed in chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infections. Clinical outcome for patients positive for serum HBVDNA was much worse than those negative for serum HBVDNA. When chronic hepatitis with acute exacerbation occurs in patients with concurrent HBV and HCV infection, aggressive management should be investigated and antiviral therapy targeting of HBV infection should be administered early.