中央角膜厚度对Goldmann眼压计与非接触式眼压计测量值的影响

目的探讨中央角膜厚度（CCT）对Goldmann眼压计与非接触式眼压计（NCT）眼压测量值的影响。方法分别用Goldmann眼压计与NCT测量83例（83只眼）正常人的眼压,采用光学相干断层扫描仪（OCT）测量CCT。采用配对T检验比较Goldmann眼压计与NCT眼压计眼压测量值的差异,采用线性相关分析方法分析两种眼压计眼压测量值之间的相关关系,并分析CCT对两种眼压计眼压测量值的影响。结果Goldmann眼压计测得的眼压平均值为（13.46±2.93）mmHg,NCT测得的平均值为（12.29±3.47）mmHg,两者之间差异有显著性（t=5.831,P〈0.001）;两种眼压计眼压测量值呈正相关（r=0.852,P〈0.001）。Goldmann眼压计眼压测量值和NCT眼压测量值均与CCT呈正相关,r值分别为0.424（P〈0.001）和0.568（P〈0.001）。Goldmann眼压计眼压测量值与NCT眼压测量值的差值与CCT呈负相关（r=-0.402,P〈0.001）。去除CCT因素影响后,两种眼压计眼压测量值的残差差异无显著性（t=-0.272,P=0.787）。结论Goldmann眼压计与NCT眼压计眼压测量值均受CCT的影响，CCT对NCT眼压测量值的影响更大；两种眼压计眼压测量值的差异可能来源于个体CCT的差异。     

中央角膜厚度对3种眼压计眼压测量值的影响

目的比较分析不同中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)下Icare回弹式眼压计、Goldmann压平式眼压计(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)和动态轮廓眼压计(dynamic contour tonometry,DCT)的眼压测量结果,探讨CCT对3种眼压计测量值的影响。方法 对78例患者152眼分别用Icare、GAT、DCT3种眼压计进行眼压测量,并进行CCT的测量,对比不同CCT下3种眼压计的测量结果,分析眼压测量值与CCT的关系。结果 在全部受测者中Icare、GAT、DCT测得的眼压均值分别为(19.16±5.03)mmHg(1 kPa=7.5 mmHg)、(18.41±4.52)mmHg和(17.23±3.69)mmHg,三者之间有显著差异(F=7.256,P=0.001)。Icare和GAT的眼压测量值均与CCT显著相关(r=0.341,P<0.001;r=0.333,P<0.001),CCT每改变10μm,Icare的眼压值改变0.47 mmHg,GAT的眼压值改变0.41 mmHg;而DCT的眼压测量值与CCT无显著相关(r=0.032,P=0.699)。结论 Icare、GAT的眼压测量值均明显受CCT的影响,而Icare受CCT影响的程度较GAT的稍大,DCT的眼压测量值基本不受CCT的影响。     

新型非接触式眼压分析仪ORA与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较

目的比较新型非接触式眼压分析仪ORA与Goldmann压平式眼压计测量眼压的差异,以评价ORA眼压测量仪在临床眼压测量中的应用价值。方法本院门诊127例237眼分别由专人进行非接触眼压测量仪ORA与Goldmann压平式眼压计测量,并同时用超声角膜测厚仪测量角膜厚度。结果127例病人237眼,Goldmann压平眼压值和ORA直接测量结果（IOPG）分别为（17.94±6.50）mmHg和（18.88±7.93）mmHg,两者比较差异有显著统计学意义（P=0.000）;正常人群平均角膜厚度为（546.19±36.34）μm,经角膜厚度-眼压公式校正IOPG平均值为17.42±3.92mmHg,ORA经自带软件处理后的眼压值（IOPcc）平均为（17.50±4.38）mmHg,两者比较差异无统计学意义（P=0.681）,IOPG校正前两者比较差异有统计学意义（P=0.024）。结论新型非接触式眼压分析仪ORA的直接测量值与Goldmann压平眼压计的测量值相近略高,ORA的测量分析值IOPcc是排除角膜因素影响更接近真实的眼压结果。     

角膜厚度对两种眼压测量方法的影响

目的　比较非接触眼压计 (non -contacttonometer ,NCT)和Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压的差异 ,并分别探讨中央角膜厚度 (centralcornealthickniss ,CCT)对这两种测量方法的影响。方法　对 1 0 8例拟接受PRK或LASIK手术的患者行CCT ,NCT和Goldmann压平计眼压测量。结果NCT和Goldmann压平眼压计测得的眼压均值具有显著性差异 (F =89 .70 4 4,P <0 . 0 1 )。CCT与NCT和Goldmann压平眼压计测量值呈正相关 ,相关系数分别是r =0. 4 96 0 (t =8 .356 3,P <0 .0 0 1 )和r =0 . 2 1 1 3(t =3. 1 6 2 3,P <0 .0 0 1 )。结论　NCT和Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压值有差异 ,NCT测量值大于Goldmann压平眼压计 ,CCT对NCT的影响大于Goldmann压平眼压计。     

不同角膜厚度下Pentacam系统对压平眼压计测量值的校正

目的 比较Goldmann压平眼压计(Goldmann applanation tonometry,GAT)和Pentacam眼压校正系统在中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)不同的正常眼测量值的差异,评价其校正准确性.方法 对69例(69只眼)按CCT不同,分为正常组(520～<580μm)42只眼、较薄组(450～<520μm)16眼、增厚组(580～640μm)11只眼.应用Pentacam前房分析仪检查和Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压,并用Pentacam系统所提供的4种校正方法对眼压测量值进行校正.结果 角膜正常组和角膜增厚组中,平均GAT、各组眼压校正值之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),GAT、各组眼压校正值与CCT之间无线性相关(P>0.05);角膜较薄组中,平均GAT、各组眼压校正值之间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),GAT值与CCT之间线性相关(IOP=0.067×CCT-16.582,r2=0.730,P<0.05),Shah组校正值与CCT之间亦存在线性相关(IOP=0.076×CCT-25.349,r2=0.328,P<0.05);其余各组与CCT之间无明显相关(P>0.05).结论 Pentacam三维眼前段分析仪根据角膜厚度校正眼压测量值,尤其对角膜较薄组使用Dresden校正公式,有助于对其诊断和治疗提供更加准确的依据.     

非接触式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压的比较

目的 :比较非接触式眼压计 ( NCT)和 Goldm ann压平眼压计测量眼压的差异。方法 :对 112例 ( 2 2 0眼 )志愿者分别进行 NCT和 Goldmann压平眼压计眼压测量及中央角膜厚度测量 ,并对其中 16 8眼进行自动验光检查。结果 :NCT和 Goldmann眼压计眼压测量值分别为 1.98± 0 .6 9k Pa和 2 .34± 0 .77k Pa。 NCT眼压测量值较 Goldmann眼压测量值偏低 0 .36± 0 .37k Pa( P<0 .0 5 )。眼压在 1.33～ 2 .6 7k Pa内 ,二种眼压计测量眼压值偏差最小。角膜厚度和眼球屈光度与 NCT眼压测量值分别呈明显正相关和负相关。结论 :NCT眼压测量值较Goldmann眼压测量值偏低 ,NCT眼压值为临界眼压时 ,应应用 Goldm ann压平眼压计校正     

相干光断层扫描仪检测正常人及青光眼患者中央角膜厚度

目的探讨相干光断层扫描仪(OCT)测量正常人、原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)、高眼压症(OHT)患者的中央角膜厚度(CCT)。方法采用OCT3测量正常人143例(143只眼)、POAG患者36例(36只眼)、NTG患者39例(39只眼)及OHT患者40例(40只眼)的CCT,并进行单因素4水平设计定量资料的方差分析;用线性回归方法分析正常人CCT与Goldmann压平眼压测量值的相关关系;对OCT测量CCT观察者间和观察者内的一致性进行类内相关系数(ICC)分析。结果正常组、POAG组、NTG组及OHT组的平均CCT值分别为(523.66±32.13)μm、(530.92±27.32)μm、(506.92±21.49)μm及(573.13±27.39)μm。POAG组与正常人组的平均CCT值差异无统计学意义(P=0.099);OHT组的平均CCT值大于其他各组,均P<0.01;NTG组的平均CCT值小于其他各组,均P<0.01。正常组CCT与眼压值呈正相关(r=0.318,R2=0.101,P<0.01)。OCT测量CCT的测量者间和测量者内的ICC值分别为0.995和0.996。结论OCT可以准确地测量CCT;NTG患者平均CCT比正常人薄,而OHT患者比正常人厚;CCT可以影响Goldmann压平眼压计的测量值,但贡献率较小。(中华眼科杂志,2006,42:199-203)     

近视眼角膜厚度与眼压相关因素分析

目的 探讨近视眼角膜中央厚度(CCT)、屈光度、角膜曲率、年龄、性别与眼压(IOP)测量值之间的关系.方法 对219例431只眼用超声角膜测厚仪、Goldmann眼压计、检影镜及电脑验光仪和ObscanⅡ角膜地形图分别测量其数据.结果 近视眼患者CCT与IOP之间具有直线正相关性,CCT每增加10μm,眼压值约增加0.5 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa).近视患者CCT与屈光度数具有负相关性.近视患者CCT与角膜曲率、年龄及性别不相关.结论 CCT为影响IOP测量的一个重要因素,检查CCT有助于更好的了解真实IOP值;CCT随近视眼患者屈光度数的增加有变薄的趋势.     

中央角膜厚度对压平眼压计测量值的影响

目的采用非接触式角膜内皮镜测量高眼压症与临床常见类型青光眼患者的中央角膜厚度central corneal thickness(CCT),并与正常人CCT平均值比较,探讨CCT对青光眼诊断、分类与治疗的指导意义.方法采用KONAN非接触式角膜内皮镜测量中央角膜厚度,Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼内压(IOP).将39例52眼原发性开角型青光眼(POAG),32例45眼慢性闭角型青光眼(CACG),18例29眼高眼压症眼(OHT),15例24眼正常眼压性青光眼(NTG),34例66眼可疑开角型青光眼(GS)的CCT和IOP值与173例322眼正常眼进行比较研究.所有资料输入计算机后在Windows操作环境下使用SPSS10.0统计软件进行统计分析.结果平均CCT值比较高眼压症(OHT)眼(600.21±24.20μm)＞POAG眼(574.37±31.92μm)＞正常对照眼(554.78±32.61μm)＞NTG眼(528.43±36.40μm).OHT、NTG、POAG眼与正常眼的CCT值有差异(F=9.629,P=0.000),CACG眼与POAG及正常眼CCT值均无差异(P=0.119).GS眼CCT值(564.72±31.96μm)较正常眼厚.CCT与IOP成直线正相关,眼压测量值的校正公式为眼压校正值(mmHg)=-(测得的角膜厚度μm-555μm)×(1/24).IOP经CCT校正后,OHT眼平均高估1.89mHg,NTG眼平均低估1.1mmHg,POAG眼平均高估0.80mmHg.根据经CCT校正后的IOP值,13.5%POAG眼重新诊断为NTG眼,34.5%OHT眼重新诊断为正常眼,16.7%NTG眼重新诊断为POAG眼.结论非接触式角膜内皮镜能准确地测量中央角膜厚度.OHT眼CCT较厚,而NTG眼CCT较薄.CCT测量对青光眼的分类与治疗有重要的指导意义,应作为OHT、NTG及GS的常规检查项目.     

Goldmann压平眼压计与非接触式眼压计测量眼压的对比研究

目的:比较Goldmann压平眼压计(Goldmannapplanationtonometer,GAT)与非接触眼压计(non-contacttonometer,NCT)测量眼压的差异,以评价NCT与GAT测量的相关性。方法:对265例志愿者(529眼)分别采用Goldmann压平眼压计与非接触眼压计测量眼压。结果:非接触眼压计的测量结果低于Goldmann压平眼压计,且差异有显著性(19.13vs23.43,t=22.644,P<0.01),随眼压值的升高,两者相差幅度增大,差异在眼压〉30mmHg时更为明显,但相关系数逐渐变小。结论:非接触眼压计眼压测量值较Goldmann眼压测量值偏低,非接触眼压计眼压值为临界眼压时,需应用Gold-mann压平眼压计校正,以便及时发现病理性眼压升高,避免青光眼的漏诊和失治。     

Strabisme Alternant - Etude clinique - traitement

The author defines motor and sensory alternation: the term alternation should not be used in isolation, it should always be accompanied by the name of the parameter concerned. Sensory alternation is always found together with motor alternation but the reverse is not true.The examining criteria for a diagnosis of sensory alternation are given, sensory alternation must not be confused with alternating inhibition. Working from clinical observations of cases of motor alternating strabismus, the author selects 2 types of binocular sensory relations which allow one to differentiate between:- cases of primary alternating strabismus- cases of secondary alternating strabismusThese forms will develop in different ways; in both cases a cure is possible providing that the right treatment is prescribed and once prescribed carefully followed, etc. It is always a case of serious forms of strabismus whose developmental period is spread over several years.According to the authors, the frequency of cases of true primary strabismus is from 1–3%, the frequency of cases of secondary alternating strabismus varies according to the type of therapy practised on cases of monocular strabismus with amblyopia. These latter will become cases of alternating strabismus under the influence of certain types of therapy carried out over several years (penalization, rocking, alternated occlusion, etc...).Experimental data on kittens confirm clinical data; kittens placed in abnormal environments during the sensitive period will show modification in the distribution of cortical cells and the absence of binocular cells (either because the excitation of the two eyes was not simultaneous, or not identical: artificial strabismus, occlusion, opaque glasses). This disturbances become irreversible after a certain period of exposure (a function of age, length of exposure, etc...).It is thus necessary to bear in mind: 1) the iatrogenic risks of certain orthoptic treatments, 2) the necessity for a binocular form of treatment as soon as possible, as once a certain stage is passed, cortical plasticity diminishes and the elaboration of normal binocular relations becomes impossible.

---

     

Effects of Adenosine Agonists on Intraocular Pressure and Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Cynomolgus Monkeys

The effects of single or multiple topical doses of the relatively selective A₁adenosine receptor agonists (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) and N⁶-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) on intraocular pressure (IOP), aqueous humor flow (AHF) and outflow facility were investigated in ocular normotensive cynomolgus monkeys. IOP and AHF were determined, under ketamine anesthesia, by Goldmann applanation tonometry and fluorophotometry, respectively. Total outflow facility was determined by anterior chamber perfusion under pentobarbital anesthesia. A single unilateral topical application of R-PIA (20–250 μg) or CHA (20–500 μg) produced ocular hypertension (maximum rise=4.9 or 3.5 mmHg) within 30 min, followed by ocular hypotension (maximum fall=2.1 or 3.6 mmHg) from 2–6 hr. The relatively selective adenosine A₂antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX, 320 μg) inhibited the early hypertension, without influencing the hypotension. Neither 100 μg R-PIA nor 500 μg CHA clearly altered AHF. Total outflow facility was increased by 71% 3 hr after 100 μg R-PIA. In conclusion, the early ocular hypertension produced by topical adenosine agonists in cynomolgus monkeys is associated with the activation of adenosine A₂receptors, while the subsequent hypotension appears to be mediated by adenosine A₁receptors and results primarily from increased outflow facility.