Dietary pattern and blood pressure control in a hypertension outpatient clinic.

Although it is well known that some dietary measures are able to beneficially affect blood pressure (BP) levels, hypertensive patients find it very difficult to definitively change their nutritional habits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on BP of a return to the habitual diet following a dietary intervention period. Three hundred and seven hypertensive patients (149 females, 158 males) with a mean age of 52+/-12 years were included in the study. All enrolled patients had reported having reverted to their habitual diet after a period of at least 6 months on a prescribed low-energy and/or low-sodium diet. Nutritional habits were investigated by a simple semiquantitative 24-item food-frequency questionnaire. Patients were divided into tertiles according to their systolic BP. The groups differed in regard to their body mass index (27.6+/-4, 28.7+/-4, and 30.4+/-6 kg/m(2), respectively, for the low- to high-systolic BP groups, but were similar in regard to the number of antihypertensive pills taken (2.1+/-0.9, 2.2+/-1.2, 2.2+/-1.3) and metabolic parameters. Patients in the lowest tertile consumed a diet significantly lower in the percentage of energy from saturated fats and sodium content and significantly higher in the percentage of energy from carbohydrate, and the fiber and potassium content in comparison to the highest tertile. The number of servings of legumes, fish and cooked vegetables was higher and that of salami and cheese lower in the 1st tertile. Definitively changing a habitual diet to a healthier one is a difficult task for hypertensive patients. However, those who return to a diet richer in vegetables, legumes and fish and poorer in saturated fat and salt achieve better control of their BP, without increasing the number of antihypertensive pills.     

Evaluation of a new ambulatory blood pressure device

We assessed the OSCILL-IT ambulatory blood pressure (BP) recorder (FIGI srl, Rome, Italy) according to the performance criteria set out by the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol. The OSCILL-IT is a portable, noninvasive recorder that uses a process that correlates systolic, mean, and diastolic areas, identified on the oscillations, to the cuff absolute pressure. According to the recommendations of BHS, a large heterogeneous population (100 subjects: 52 men aged from 19 to 79—median 44 and 48 women from 19 to 74—median 54) was recruited in order to assess accuracy and to analyze, in addition, the effects of observer agreement and BP level on the observer–device differences. With reference to BP level, we suggest also a new graphic approach. Four sets of sequential, same arm, comparative BP measurements were obtained, performed by the OSCILL-IT recorder and two skilled clinicians using a mercury column, for each subject. We used a linear combination for the statistical evaluations. We confirmed the observer agreement through the frequency distribution of BP as a function of the observer and through the differences between observers. We compared OSCILL-IT with sphygmomanometric readings: the differences were not significant. A visual inspection, with the addition of regression lines, showed that there were no variations in differences at the changing of BP level. The difference between observers and OSCILL-IT was 0.2 ± 5.3 mm Hg and 0.2 ± 5.8 mm Hg both for systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). The level of agreement, according to BHS criteria, showed that 64% of all systolic and 70% of all diastolic readings obtained by the OSCILL-IT were within 5 mm Hg of the sphygmomanometric determinations. Therefore, the grade is C for SBP, even if 93% of SBP and 95% of DBP obtained by the OSCILL-IT were within 10 mm Hg of the sphygmomanometric determinations. These analyses demonstrate that the OSCILL-IT satisfies the accuracy parameters and the additional linear regression yields graphics more immediate.     

Comparison of wrist blood pressure measurement with conventional sphygmomanometry at a cardiology outpatient clinic

OBJECTIVE: Oscillometric measurement of blood pressure at the wrist is becoming a widely used method for detection of hypertension and its control by treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate accuracy and suitability of wrist measurement in a clinical routine setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 333 consecutive patients admitted to our cardiology outpatient clinic were included. Blood pressure was measured at both upper arms according to World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension guidelines. Oscillometric measurement was performed at the contralateral wrist simultaneously. Blood pressure readings were taken by an oscillometric device applied at the wrist ('Klock'; Industrielle Entwicklung Medizintechnik, Stolberg, Germany) and a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer applied at the upper arm. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were excluded due to differences in blood pressure > 5 mmHg between both upper arms or due to 'error' messages of the wrist device. The data of the remaining 255 patients (149 males; mean age, 65 +/- 13 years; range, 18-95 years) are presented. Mean conventional blood pressure was significantly lower compared with the wrist device (137 +/- 20/80 +/- 11 mmHg versus 153 +/- 28/87 +/- 18 mmHg; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). The mean difference was 16 +/- 25/6 +/- 17 mmHg. In clinical terms, differences in blood pressure exceeding +/-20/+/-10 mmHg reflecting classification of hypertension are considered important. Measurements of 101 (40%) patients were within these limits. Systolic readings of 110 (43%) and diastolic readings of 117 patients (46%) were beyond this scope. CONCLUSION: Due to low reliability of wrist blood pressure measurement, it cannot compete with the upper arm standard procedure. If ever, it should only be used if test readings in an individual comparing wrist and upper arm measurement show differences within a range of +/-20/+/-10 mmHg.     

Secondary hypertension in a blood pressure clinic

The prevalence, reversibility, and mortality of secondary hypertension among 3783 patients with moderately severe nonmalignant hypertension attending the Glasgow (Scotland) Blood Pressure Clinic were assessed. Underlying causes of hypertension were found in 297 patients (7.9%). Eighty-seven patients (2.3%) were considered to have a potentially reversible cause for their hypertension, including the oral contraceptive pill (38 patients), renovascular disease (27 patients), and primary hyperaldosteronism (ten patients), but of these only 33 patients (0.9% of total clinic population) were cured by specific intervention. Two hundred ten patients (5.6%) had irreversible renal parenchymal disease and significantly higher mortality than men and women with other causes of hypertension. Excess deaths in the renal group were attributed to renal failure (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] 580 to 589) and vascular causes (ICD 390 to 458) but not to cancer (ICD 140 to 208; 235 to 239) or other nonvascular disease. These results suggest that investigation of hypertension for an underlying cause will reveal a small number of patients with treatable disorders, of whom only a few will be cured by specific intervention, and a moderate number with irreversible disease who are at high risk of myocardial infarction and stroke.     

Self-monitoring of home blood pressure with estimation of daily salt intake using a new electrical device

We investigated a simple device to monitor daily salt intake at home and examined the relationship between salt excretion and morning blood pressure in order to enable patients to better manage daily salt intake and hypertension. The correlation between 24-h urinary salt excretion and measured value with salt monitor from overnight urine was significant (n = 224, r = 0.72, P < 0.001). A total of 46 volunteers participated for more than 3 weeks by measuring daily salt intake and morning blood pressure. The relationship between predicted daily salt excretion and blood pressure was examined with use of 3-day moving average. Mean salt excretion and systolic blood pressure (SBP) significantly decreased by the end of the trial (i.e., salt excretion decreased from 158+/-31 to 149+/-30 mmol/day and SBP from 137+/-17 to 133+/-16 mm Hg). Of 46 participants, 18 (39%) had a significant correlation between predicted daily salt excretion and blood pressure (r > 0.4, P < 0.05, n > 21), indicating sodium sensitivity. An additional 17% had a positive correlation that did not reach statistical significance (0.2 < r < or = 0.4), and the remaining 44% had no correlation (r < or = 0.2). Mean decrease in blood pressure per decrease in salt (g) (17 mmol) intake in the 18 participants with a significant correlation was 3.3 mm Hg (SBP) and 1.5 mm Hg (diastolic blood pressure), which was higher than that reported for other studies. Hypertensive patients not using medication showed the largest decrease. We conclude that daily monitoring of salt intake and morning blood pressure will be useful for management of hypertension.     

Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic

BACKGROUND: We compared the Omron 725 CIC device (Omron Healthcare Inc., Vernon Hills, Illinois, USA), which is designed to register the blood pressure on the arm, with a mercury sphygmomanometer. In addition, we evaluated the possible impact that this device might have on the decisions made in a hypertension clinic. METHODS: Patients (n=183) older than 18 years (range 18-84 years) with a wide range of systolic (87-197 mmHg) and diastolic (48-108 mmHg) blood pressures were included. Some of the standards of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and of the British Hypertension Society were used to evaluate the results of the automated device in clinical practice. RESULTS: Using Bland-Altman analysis, an underestimation of both measures was observed with the automated Omron 725 CIC device; the systolic pressure was 3.6+/-8.8 mmHg too low with a very wide range of -13.7 to 20.9 and the diastolic pressure was also 4.4+/-6.3 mmHg too low with a range of -8.1 to 16.9. Clinical decisions could have been changed in 24 of the 116 hypertensive patients (20.6%) if the readings of the automated device had been used instead of using the readings of a mercury sphygmomanometer. These could have included modifying the dosage or changing the medicine used. CONCLUSION: The blood pressure measurements by Omron 725 CIC are different from those of blood pressure readings taken with a mercury sphygmomanometer and this could affect clinical decisions in the diagnosis and follow-up of a hypertensive patient in an office environment.     

Automated blood pressure determination during exercise test. Clinical evaluation of a new automated device.

The accuracy and reproducibility of a new automatic device (P) specially designed for noninvasive blood pressure monitoring during the exercise stress test were evaluated in 50 consecutive subjects (34 normotensives and 16 hypertensives). Automatic measurements were compared with those taken by a sphygmomanometer (RR). A good agreement between systolic pressure values obtained by the two methods was found (RR 159 +/- 30 mmHg, P 158 +/- 28 mmHg, mean difference = -1.53 +/- 13 mmHg, p = 0.166, ns). On the contrary the new device significantly underestimated diastolic pressure values (RR 89.3 +/- 13 mmHg; P 84 +/- 13 mmHg, mean difference -5.37 +/- 9.3, p < 0.001). In conclusion the new device seems able to measure systolic but underestimates diastolic blood pressure both in hypertensives and in normotensives during the effort test.     

Value of a cardiovascular limited ultrasound examination using a hand-carried ultrasound device on clinical management in an outpatient medical clinic

Limited ultrasound imaging studies using hand-carried ultrasound devices at the point of care have individually shown feasibility in the detection of carotid atheroma, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left atrial enlargement, and abdominal aortic aneurysm. To evaluate the utility of a specific cardiovascular limited ultrasound examination (CLUE) designed to detect all 4 entities in patients seen in an outpatient medical clinic. One hundred ninety-six patients underwent coronary heart disease risk stratification by National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines and CLUE with a hand-carried ultrasound device with cardiac and vascular transducers. CLUE included brief imaging of the carotid arteries, the heart, and the intra-abdominal aorta. The prevalence of abnormal CLUE results and their effect on clinical management were tabulated and stratified by coronary heart disease risk class. Patient age (mean +/- SD) was 56 +/- 14 years (range 22 to 95), and 32.1% were at low risk, 30.6% at intermediate risk, and 37.2% at high risk. Of the 196 CLUEs, abnormalities were present in 37.2% (32.7% had carotid atheroma, 3.1% had systolic dysfunction, 6.1% had left atrial enlargement, and 1.0% had abdominal aortic aneurysm) and were related to age, increasing coronary heart disease risk, and male gender. Overall, CLUE resulted in new management recommendations in 20% of patients, primarily in coronary heart disease risk prevention. In patients at intermediate risk or aged 60 to 69 years, CLUE resulted in new recommendations in 39% and 37%, respectively. In conclusion, when applied to a clinic population, brief cardiovascular ultrasound exams frequently demonstrate unsuspected findings that can change management.     

Validation of a new method of detecting peripheral artery disease by determination of ankle-brachial index using an automatic blood pressure device

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a predictor of total and cardiovascular mortality; its most valuable simple index is the ankle-brachial index (ABI). The present study was designed to assess whether a commercially available automatic device could be used to determine ABI in comparison with the classical Doppler method. The ABI was defined as the ratio of systolic blood pressure at each ankle to the maximal brachial systolic pressure, a pathological index being defined for a ratio <0.90. The ABI were calculated in 219 consecutive patients (aged 55 +/-19 years) with systolic blood pressure measured either by using a mercury sphygmo-manometer and a continuous-wave Doppler probe or an automatic manometer Omron M4. This device has been validated for measurements in upper limbs, and so the authors undertook validation in the lower limbs versus intraarterial measurements. There was an excellent correlation between intraarterial measurements and automatic readings in the range of 70-220 mm Hg, r=0.99, p<0.001. The systolic pressures measured in upper limbs correlated well in the right (r=0.87, p<0.001) and the left (r=0.89, p<0.001) upper limbs; and in the left (r=0.72, p<0.001) and the right (r=0.68, p<0.001) lower limbs. Correlations between ABI in both methods were good in the left (r=0.66, p<0.001) and the right (r=0.61, p<0.001) lower limbs. The sensitivity (76%), specificity (95%), positive predictive value (86%), negative predictive value (90%), and global accuracy (89%) of a pathological automatic index to predict an abnormal Doppler index were good. The use of a simple, automatic blood pressure device to determine ABI appears feasible, easy, and precise. It would provide a practical tool for physicians not trained in Doppler to detect PAD.     

Determination of clinical accuracy and nocturnal blood pressure pattern by new portable device for monitoring indirect ambulatory blood pressure

The accuracy and clinical application of a new portable device for measuring ambulatory blood pressure (BP) (ABPM 630, Nippon Colin, Nagoya, Japan) were assessed. The device uses a conventional arm cuff inflated by CO2 gas from a compact cartridge and is based on a cuff-oscillometric as well as a Korotkoff sound (microphone) technique. Blood pressure values obtained by ABPM 630 were compared with those measured by the auscultatory method. With the microphone method the mean differences from the auscultatory method were -0.28 +/- 6.15 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) for SBP and 0.96 +/- 6.28 mm Hg for DBP (n = 256), while for the cuff-oscillometric method the mean differences were -1.77 +/- 6.07 mm Hg for SBP and 3.06 +/- 6.87 mm Hg for DBP (n = 297). There was a highly significant correlation between BP values measured by the auscultatory method and ABPM 630. In 40 untreated subjects, 24 h BP was monitored simultaneously with the ABPM 630 and with a finger volume-oscillometric device (UBP-100, UEDA, Tokyo, Japan). The daytime average of SBP with the former (126 +/- 11.6 mm Hg) was almost the same as that with the latter (123 +/- 16.0 mm Hg), while the nighttime average in the former (117 +/- 9.7 mm Hg) was significantly higher than that in the latter (108 +/- 14.1 mm Hg, P less than .01). Only 4 out of 40 subjects experienced no sleep disturbance from the arm-cuff inflation. Five of the 40 subjects complained that their sleep was frequently interrupted by the arm-cuff inflation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Detecting white coat and reverse white coat effects in clinic settings using measures of blood pressure habituation in the clinic and patient self-monitoring of blood pressure

To examine the utility of blood pressure (BP) habituation within and across multiple clinic visits and patient-determined home BP monitoring for detecting white coat (WCE) and reverse white coat effects (RWCE) commonly observed in medical settings, 54 patients undergoing evaluation for hypertension in an internal medicine group practice were categorized according to the magnitude of differences between systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) obtained in the clinic and through ambulatory BP monitoring. BPs were measured four times during three separate clinic visits, during a 1-week home BP monitoring period, and during a single 24-h ambulatory monitoring period. Patients whose mean clinic and average daytime BPs were within +/-5 mm Hg were categorized as having stable BP; patients whose clinic BPs were >5 mm Hg of their daytime BPs were categorized as showing a WCE and patients whose average daytime BPs were >5 mm Hg of their clinic BPs were categorized as showing a RWCE. Results revealed that degree of habituation occurring between the first and third clinic visits significantly predicted magnitude of both the WCE and RWCE for SBP, with greater habituation being associated with the WCE and lesser habituation associated with the RWCE. Greater SBP habituation within clinic visits was associated with the WCE for SBP and greater DBP habituation within clinic visits was associated with the WCE for DBP. Lesser DBP habituation within clinic visits was associated with the RWCE for both SBP and DBP. Home BP monitoring did not contribute to predicting either WCE or RWCE.     

Multiple clinic and home blood pressure measurements versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

To compare multiple clinic and home blood pressure (BP) measurements and ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of hypertension, we studied 239 middle-aged pharmacologically untreated hypertensive men and women who were referred to the study from the primary healthcare provider. Ambulatory BP monitoring was successfully completed for 233 patients. Clinic BP was measured by a trained nurse with a mercury sphygmomanometer and averaged over 4 duplicate measures. Self-recorded home BP was measured with a semiautomatic oscillometric device twice every morning and twice every evening on 7 consecutive days. Ambulatory BP was recorded with an auscultatory device. Two-dimensionally controlled M-mode echocardiography was successfully performed on 232 patients. Twenty-four-hour urinary albumin was determined by nephelometry. Clinic BP was 144.5+/-12.6/94.5+/-7.4 mm Hg, home BP (the mean of 14 self-recorded measures) was 138.9+/-13.1/92.9+/-8.6 mm Hg, home morning BP (the mean of the first 4 duplicate morning measures) was 137.1+/-13.7/92.4+/-9.2 mm Hg, daytime ambulatory BP was 148.3+/-13. 9/91.9+/-7.8 mm Hg, nighttime ambulatory BP was 125.5+/-16.4/75. 6+/-8.9 mm Hg, and 24-hour ambulatory BP was 141.7+/-14.0/87.2+/-7.6 mm Hg. Pearson correlation coefficients of clinic, home, home morning, and daytime ambulatory BPs to albuminuria and to the characteristics of the left ventricle were nearly equal. In multivariate regression analyses, 36% (P<0.0001) of the cross-sectional variation in left ventricular mass index was attributed to gender and home morning systolic BP in models that originally included age, gender, and clinic, self-measured home morning, and ambulatory daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour systolic and diastolic BPs. We concluded that carefully controlled nonphysician-measured clinic and self-measured home BPs, when averaged over 4 duplicate measurements, are as reliable as ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of untreated hypertension.     

Automated assessment of blood pressure using BpTRU compared with assessments by a trained technician and a clinic nurse

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of a new automated blood pressure manometer (BpTRU) relative to auscultatory blood pressure assessed by a research nurse and to that assessed by a clinic nurse. METHODS: Firefighters in a cohort study had blood pressure assessed on up to five occasions with BpTRU and by a trained research technician. Patients in an internal medicine clinic had blood pressure assessed by the clinic nurse and by BpTRU. The absolute values of blood pressure, reproducibility and effect on hypertension classification were compared with the different methods. RESULTS: The research technician readings were higher than the BpTRU readings at visit 1 (3.0/2.7 mmHg, P<0.0001) but the readings converged by visits 4-5 because of a greater reduction in the research nurse readings. The BpTRU readings had similar reproducibility and classification of hypertension as the research technician but did not exhibit terminal digit preference while the research technician readings did. The BpTRU had substantially lower readings (8/7 mmHg) and fewer hypertensive readings than those of the nurse in the internal medicine clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study found that the BpTRU had desirable characteristics that suggest that it would be a suitable replacement for auscultatory assessment of blood pressure in clinical practice. A large confirmatory study performed in a usual clinic setting is required.     

Evaluation of a new care system provided to diabetic patients in the outpatient clinic

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of metabolic states and chronic complications is essential for maintaining a high quality of care for diabetic patients. We have assessed the quality of care in routine outpatient clinics for diabetic subjects in our university hospital, and compared with those in a newly introduced standardized clinic to evaluate the new care system. METHODS: The quality of care was assessed by the chart review in 1995, and compared with those from 1996-1997 in the "Diabetes Follow-up Clinic" which is systematically designed for the standardized care. PATIENTS: The subjects were recruited among 860 patients who visited the outpatient clinic in July and August of 1995 with a diagnosis of diabetes or glucose intolerance. Six hundred seventy-two patients whose follow-up period had been more than 6 months with clinically diagnosed diabetes were used for the analysis. RESULTS: Laboratory tests such as determination of HbA1c, and serum levels of lipids and creatinine were performed in more than 90% of the patients in the routine outpatient clinics. However, ophthalmology referral, 24-hour urine collection for the determination of creatinine clearance and albumin excretion, and electrocardiograms were not well performed and were incompletely documented (40-60% of the patients within a previous year and 70-80% in the last 2 years). In the standardized "Diabetes Follow-up Clinic", only four out of 555 diabetic patients failed to collect their 24-hour urine, and all participants had ankle blood pressure measurements, nerve conduction study, and nylon monofilament tests, etc. Furthermore, more than 95% of the patients had funduscopic examinations by ophthalmologists as well as records of electrocardiogram. CONCLUSION: Introduction of the standardized "Diabetes Follow-up Clinic" may be one of the choices for increasing the quality of outpatient care and for the prevention of chronic diabetic complications.