Domino liver transplantation in living donors

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) has been developed as a method to expand the donor pool. In living donors DLT, the prime concern is to avoid any disadvantage to the donor and the first recipient. Seven DLTs were performed among 211 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation. The domino recipients included six with hepatocellular carcinoma and one with citrullinemia. The domino grafts were obtained from patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) including the left liver in three cases and the right liver in four. Among the seven domino recipients, a 64-year-old woman with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma died of lung metastasis. The other six domino recipients are alive without FAP symptoms. In living donor liver transplantation, because the vessels of the graft from the first donor are not long enough for anastomosis, the hepatic vessels must be left as long as possible when removing the liver from the FAP patients in order to ensure sufficient safety for vascular reconstruction. With careful decision making during the procedure, such as where to divide the vessels in the FAP patients, DLT may help address the shortage of liver grafts.     

Split liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: This study reviews the indications, technical aspects, and experience with ex vivo and in situ split liver transplantation. BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric donor livers is the most significant factor inhibiting further application of liver transplantation for patients with end-stage liver disease. Pediatric recipients, although they represent only 15% to 20% of the liver transplant registrants, suffer the greatest from the scarcity of size-matched cadaveric organs. Split liver transplantation provides an ideal means to expand the donor pool for both children and adults. METHODS: This review describes the evolution of split liver transplantation from reduced liver transplantation and living-related liver transplantation. The two types of split liver transplantation, ex vivo and in situ, are compared and contrasted, including the technique, selection of patients for each procedure, and the most current results. RESULTS: Ex vivo splitting of the liver is performed on the bench after removal from the cadaver. It is usually divided into two grafts: segments 2 and 3 for children, and segments 4 to 8 for adults. Since 1990, 349 ex vivo grafts have been reported. Until recently, graft and patient survival rates have been lower and postoperative complication rates higher in ex vivo split grafts than in whole organ cadaveric transplantation. Further, the use of ex vivo split grafts has been relegated to the elective adult patient because of the high incidence of graft dysfunction (right graft) when placed in an emergent patient. Reasons for the poor function of ex vivo splits except in elective patients have focused on graft damage due to prolonged cold ischemia times and rewarming during the long benching procedure. In situ liver splitting is accomplished in a manner identical to the living donor procurement. This technique for liver splitting results in the same graft types as in the ex vivo technique. However, graft and patient survival rates reported for in situ split livers have exceeded 85% and 90%, respectively, with a lower incidence of postoperative complications, including biliary and reoperation for bleeding. These improved results have also been observed in the urgent patient. CONCLUSION: Splitting of the cadaveric liver expands the donor pool of organs and may eliminate the need for living-related donation for children. Recent experience with the ex vivo technique, if applied to elective patients, results in patient and graft survival rates comparable to whole-organ transplantation, although postoperative complication rates are higher. In situ splitting provides two grafts of optimal quality that can be applied to the entire spectrum of transplant recipients: it is the method of choice for expanding the cadaver liver donor pool.     

Whole-Liver Graft Without the Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava for Sequential (Domino) Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Grafts used in Domino liver transplantation (LT) obtained from living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) patients have been mainly used as reduced grafts. Because of small-for-size problems seen in LDLT, using whole liver grafts could improve post-LT outcome. Eight consecutive Domino LDLT using whole livers without retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) from FAP patients were retrospectively analyzed. The graft weight/recipient's body weight ratio (GWRW) in the domino recipients ranged from 1.28% to 2.4% (mean: 1.52). Multiple vascular reconstructions in the whole-liver domino LT resulted in longer than usual warm ischemia time (mean: 64 min); however immediate post-operative recovery of hepatic function was uneventful. At 8-40 months after the transplant, all the FAP patients are well and all of the domino recipients are alive. Domino LT using a whole FAP liver from a LDLT for a FAP patient presents satisfactory results, even though the transplant procedure is technically complicated.     

Split liver transplantation

Seventy-five thousand Americans develop organ failure each year. Fifteen percent of those on the list for transplantation die while waiting. Several possible mechanisms to expand the organ pool are being pursued including the use of extended criteria donors, living donation, and split deceased donor transplants. Cadaveric organ splitting results from improved understanding of the surgical anatomy of the liver derived from Couinaud. Early efforts focused on reduced-liver transplantation (RLT) reported by both Bismuth and Broelsch in the mid-1980s. These techniques were soon modified to create both a left lateral segment graft appropriate for a pediatric recipient and a right trisegment for an appropriately sized adult. Techniques of split liver transplantation (SLT) were also modified to create living donor liver transplantation. Pichlmayr and Bismuth reported successful split liver transplantation in 1989 and Emond reported a larger series of nine split procedures in 1990. Broelsch and Busuttil described a technical modification in which the split was performed in situ at the donor institution with surgical division completed in the heart beating cadaveric donor. In situ splitting reduces cold ischemia, simplifies identification of biliary and vascular structures, and reduces reperfusion hemorrhage. However, in situ splits require specialized skills, prolonged operating room time, and increased logistical coordination at the donor institution. At UCLA over 120 in situ splits have been performed and this technique is the default when an optimal donor is available. Split liver transplantation now accounts for 10% of adult transplantations at UCLA and 40% of pediatric transplantations.     

Domino liver transplants for metabolic disorders: experience with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy

Background: Shortage of liver donors means that new methods of liver procurement must be explored. In domino transplantation, organs explanted during transplantation in one patient are transplanted into a second patient. Domino procedures can be performed with livers from patients having transplantion for hepatic metabolic disorders that cause systemic disease without affecting other liver functions. Familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) type I is one of these.

Study Design: We reviewed the Paul Brousse experience with a domino liver transplant program for FAP, hoping to extend the approach to other metabolic disorders.

Results: Livers from 10 patients transplanted for FAP type 1 were used for domino transplants to patients with unresectable primary or metastatic liver cancers. There was no perioperative mortality. Neuropathy or cardiomyopathy did not increase the morbidity of the domino liver explant and transplant procedures. Morbidity for the domino recipients did not appear to be increased. Variant transthyretin was detected in the serum in FAP liver recipients, with no immediate clinical consequences.

Conclusions: The domino approach is feasible and requires careful planning of the surgical procedures for liver explantation, particularly for the nature and site of vascular anastomoses. Domino transplantation of metabolically dysfunctional livers creates new categories of potential donors and potential recipients. It raises new ethical, technical, and societal issues. The domino approach could be used in several genetic or biochemical disorders now treated by liver transplantation. It has the potential to increase the number of liver grafts available for transplantation.     

The concept and technique of the split liver in clinical transplantation

Extreme scarcity of small pediatric donors makes a search necessary for technical variants to benefit infants and small children from the larger group of potential adolescent and adult donors. Three such technical variants are available for orthotopic transplantation. The reduced-size graft allows a weight ratio between donor and recipient of up to 4 to 6. The segmental graft allows transplantation of segments of livers from adult donors into infants and small children of up to a weight ratio of 8 to 9. The technique of the split liver, whereby one single donor liver is divided in such a way as to obtain two viable grafts for transplantation into two different recipients, is the most recent technical variant used to increase the flexibility of liver replacement and maximize the use of the donor liver pool. We report herein our two first cases of split liver with transplantation in four different recipients, with two long-term survivors. The described technique can also be useful in urgent adult transplantation.     

Adult living donor liver transplantation: Perspectives from 100 liver transplant surgeons

The involvement of healthy living donors and the degree of technical difficulty make adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) different from any other surgical procedure. We surveyed 100 liver transplant surgeons to assess their views on the complex issues raised by LDLT. Data were collected at meetings on LDLT and by electronic mail. The study instrument was divided into general, donor, surgeon, recipient, and donor and recipient issues. Subjects provided the projected 1-year survival threshold that they would require for the recipient before they would perform LDLT. They listed the three topics that they thought were most critical for transplant fellows to know about LDLT. A majority agreed that transplant programs have a duty to their patients to offer LDLT, that the increasing success of the procedure will expand indications for liver transplantation, and that the risk to the donor causes them a moral dilemma. There was more divergence of opinion regarding who should have the final say about a potential donor's candidacy, whether it is difficult for donors to comprehend the risks of the procedure, and whether repeat cadaveric transplantations should be offered for failed LDLT performed for extended indications. Surgeons' median recipient survival threshold was a conservative 79%. Priorities for educating trainees focused on understanding complications and risks, technical factors, and ethical concerns such as putting the donor first. In conclusion, the findings of this survey indicate that transplant surgeons are working to balance their moral imperative to provide life-saving therapy for transplantation candidates with the risks posed to living donors. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:637-644.)     

Hepatic flow optimization in full right split liver transplantation

Split liver transplantation for two adults offers a valuable opportunity to expand the donor pool for adult recipients.However,its application is mainly hampered by the physiological limits of these partial grafts.Small for size syndrome is a major concern during transplantation with partial graft and different techniques have been developed in living donor liver transplantation to prevent the graft dysfunction.Herein,we report the first application of synergic approaches to optimise the hepatic hemodynamic in a split liver graft for two adults. A Caucasian woman underwent liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis(MELD 21)with a full right liver graft (S5-S8)without middle hepatic vein.Minor and accessory inferior hepatic veins were preserved by splitting the vena cava;V5 and V8 were anastomosed with a donor venous iliac patch.After implantation,a 16G catheter was advanced in the main portal trunk.Inflow modulation was achieved by splenic artery ligation.Intraportal infusion of PGE1 was started intraoperatively and discontinued after 5 d.Graft function was immediate withnormalization of liver test after 7 d.Nineteen months after transplantation,liver function is normal and graft volume is 110%of the recipient standard liver volume. Optimisation of the venous outflow,inflow modulation and intraportal infusion of PGE1 may represent a valuable synergic strategy to prevent the graft dysfunction and it may increase the safety of split liver graft for two adults.     

Sequential (domino) transplantation of the liver in a transthyretin-50 familial amyloid polyneuropathy

Background: General shortage of cadaveric organs has led to a search for alternative methods to expand the donor pool. Sequential (domino) transplantation is yet another attempt to compensate for the declining consent to organ donation. Patients and methods: To qualify for a domino liver transplantation, the following preconditions must be fulfilled: (1) extrahepatic disease must exist, (2) liver must be fully functional, and (3) the genetic defect in the host should recur within a sufficient latency period. Familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disease which involves a genetic defect for transthyretin (TTR), which is predominantly produced in the liver. Results: In this report, we describe a rare case of a FAP TTR-50 variant undergoing domino liver transplantation. Since myocardial symptoms precede peripheral polyneuropathy, special emphasis should be placed on arrhythmias and the restrictive cardiomyopathy necessitating a veno-venous bypass or a cardiac pacemaker in order to improve cardiac contractility. The type of anastomosis of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava and possible alternatives are discussed. Conclusion: Despite ethical problems, the advantages of the domino procedure are obvious: (1) expansion of the donor pool, (2) ability to use living donors, and (3) presence of very short ischemic time and thus excellent liver function. Due to the kinetics of TTR production and deposition, donors and recipients of FAP livers should be followed up using an extensive neurological and cardiological protocol. Received: 15 June 1999 Accepted: 12 November 1999     

Predictors of survival after In vivo split liver transplantation: analysis of 110 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors that influence patient survival after in vivo split liver transplantation (SLT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Split liver transplantation is effective in expanding the donor pool, and its use reduces the number of deaths in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation. Early SLTs were associated with poor outcomes, and acceptance of the technique has been slow. A better understanding of the factors that influence patient and graft survival would be useful in widening the application of SLT. METHODS: During a 3.5-year period, 55 right and 55 left lateral in vivo split grafts were transplanted in 102 pediatric and adult recipients. The authors' in vivo split technique has been previously described. Median follow-up was 14.5 months. Recipient, donor, and surgical variables were analyzed for their effect on patient survival after SLT. RESULTS: Overall survival rates of patients who received an SLT were not significantly different from those of patients who received whole organ transplants. Survival of left lateral segment recipients, at median follow-up time, was 76% versus 80% in patients receiving a trisegment. Fifty of 102 patients (49%) were high-risk urgent recipients (United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS] status 1 and 2A) and 52 (51%) were nonurgent recipients (UNOS status 2B, 3). High-risk recipients had a survival rate significantly lower than that of nonurgent recipients. By univariate comparison, two variables-UNOS status and number of transplants per patient-were significantly associated with an increased risk of death. Preoperative recipient mechanical ventilation, preoperative prothrombin time, donor sodium level, donor length of hospital stay, and warm ischemia time approached significance. The type of graft (right vs. left) did not reduce the survival rate after transplantation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified UNOS status and length of donor hospital stay as independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival of in vivo SLT is not significantly different from that of whole-organ orthotopic liver transplantation. The variables affecting outcome of in vivo SLT are similar to those in whole-organ transplantation. in vivo SLT should be widely applied to expand a severely depleted donor pool.     

Transplant of livers from living relatives: selection of recipients and donors

Living relative liver transplantation is a valid alternative to cadaver transplantation especially at a time when the availability of organs cannot meet the requests of long waiting lists. This procedure was initially introduced in response to the shortage of organs for pediatric cases, but the rapid growth of demand for liver transplantation has led to its extension to the adult population. The procedure raises a number of ethical, logistic and technical questions. The ethical aspect has been widely debated and in order to be acceptable, the procedure must comply with three critical points: the need for innovation, an acceptable risk-benefit ratio and adequate informed consent. The technical aspect is essential for the success of the procedure. It calls for an extensive experience and know-how of hepatobiliary surgery on one hand, and the use of high-resolution vision on the other, an aspect which is crucial for the success of vascular anastomoses. The indications for living relative transplantation are the same as for standard transplants. The sole exception is for adult patients with 2A status who present advanced hepatic imbalance caused by chronic liver disease, thereby reducing the probability of success, above all because a living donor graft is always smaller compared to the ideal dimensions for the recipient. In view of the severe shortage of organs, living relative transplantation is an important alternative for both pediatric and adult patients. The challenge over the coming decades will be to extend living relative transplantation to a growing number of patients, without jeopardizing the health of the donor.     

Domino liver transplantation: risks and benefits

Domino liver transplantation, wherein a patient who himself undergoes liver transplantation in turn donates his liver to another recipient, has been performed since the mid-1990 s. Although livers from a handful of metabolic disorders cured by liver transplantation have been used for domino transplantation, familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) livers are by far the most common source. FAP is an inherited disorder never presenting its clinical manifestation before the age of 15. In many carriers, the genetic disorder never manifests during lifetime. Thus, only a proportion of patients with FAP develop disease symptoms, which has been the rationale for using such livers for other patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. According to the Familial Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy World Transplant Registry (FAPWTR), only 2 out of more than 500 patients so far have developed symptoms after domino liver transplantation using an FAP liver. Domino recipients with nonmalignant indications for liver transplantation show excellent long-term survivals. With careful selection of recipients, the procedure helps to reduce the organ shortage and the time on the waiting list for patients with malignant disorders.     

Operative Risks of Domino Liver Transplantation for the Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy Liver Donor and Recipient: A Double Analysis

Although domino liver transplantation (LT) is an established procedure, data about the operative risks are limited. This study aimed at evaluating the operative risks of domino LT. Two retrospective analyses were conducted (comparison of familial amyloid polyneuropathy [FAP] liver donors [61 patients] vs. FAP nondonors [39 patients] and FAP liver recipients [61 patients] vs. deceased donor liver recipients [61 patients]). First analysis showed a 60‐day mortality of 6.6% for FAP donors and 7.7% for FAP nondonors (p = 1.0). No patient developed primary graft nonfunction. Acute rejection was higher in FAP nondonors compared to FAP donors (38.5% vs. 13.1%). Both groups had similar vascular and biliary complication rates. ICU stay was similar, whereas total hospitalization was longer for FAP nondonors. Both groups had similar 1‐ and 5‐year patient and graft survival rates (83.4% vs. 87.2%, and 79.8% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.7) and (83.3% vs. 87.2%, and 79.1% vs.71.8%, p = 0.7). The second analysis showed a 1.6% mortality for FAP liver recipients vs. 3.2% of the control group (p = 1). Both groups had similar morbidity and technical complication rates (18.0% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.45) and (0.18 vs. 0.15, p = 0.65). The domino procedure does not add any risk to FAP donor or recipient. It increases the organ pool allowing transplantation of marginal recipients who otherwise are denied deceased donor liver transplantation.     

Temporary Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Using a Small Graft for Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

Donor shortage is a major issue in liver transplantation. We have successfully performed temporary auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) using a small volume graft procured from a living donor for recipients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). The aim of this study was to evaluate this procedure by comparing it with standard living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We compared 13 recipients undergoing this procedure with 23 recipients undergoing a standard LDLT for the treatment of FAP. The estimated donor graft volume and the graft volume/recipient's standard liver volume ratio were significantly smaller in the temporary APOLT group than in the standard LDLT group. Postoperative complications were comparable, although the hospital stay was longer in the temporary APOLT group. All the patients safely underwent a remnant native liver resection about 2 months after their first operation in the temporary APOLT group. No symptoms related to FAP developed before the remnant liver resection, and no significant differences in graft and patient survival were observed between the two groups. We successfully performed temporary APOLT using a small volume liver graft without postoperative liver failure for FAP. Temporary APOLT for FAP might be a useful alternative procedure for expanding the donor pool for LDLT.     

Review of anesthesia in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-accepted treatment modality of many end-stage liver diseases. The main issue in LT is the shortage of deceased donors to accommodate the needs of patients waiting for such transplants. Live donors have tremendously increased the pool of available liver grafts, especially in countries where deceased donors are not common. The main ethical concern of this procedure is the safety of healthy donors, who undergo a major abdominal surgery not for their own health, but to help cure others. The first part of the review concentrates on live donor selection, preanesthetic evaluation, and intraoperative anesthetic care for living liver donors. The second part reviews patient evaluation, intraoperative anesthesia monitoring, and fluid management of the recipient. This review provides up-to-date information to help improve the quality of anesthesia, and contribute to the success of LT and increase the long-term survival of the recipients.     

Outcomes of Domino Liver Transplantation: A Single Institution's Experience

Aims

Domino liver transplantation (DLT) is a strategy to increase the donor pool. Explanted liver from patients with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) are often used as domino grafts, because the liver is normal apart from the production of the mutated transthyretin variant. We present the outcomes for both donors and recipients of DLT.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis of initial DLT for 16 consecutive adult patients performed between July 2004 and July 2009. All cases of FAP donor to grafts were removed preserving the cava vein with reconstruction of the hepatic veins, except the first and seventh cases, where in we removed the retrohepatic vena cava with the liver without venovenous bypass. The postoperative follow-up period for surviving DLT recipients at the end of September 2009 was 2-62 months (mean, 26).

Results

Two patients out of 8 FAP donors died due to pulmonary thromboembolism on the 31st postransplant day, or sepsis at 35 days namely, an overall survival of 75%. One patient out of 8 recipients died namely, an early portal thrombosis on the 22nd postransplant day) with a crude survival of 87.5% in the recipient group (P = no significant [NS]). Four grafts from 8 FAP donors were lost—2 deaths and 2 retransplants due to thrombotic events on the first and second postransplant day—with a crude survival of 50%. Two of 8 recipients lost their grafts: 1 death and 1 retransplantation for an acute Budd-Chiari syndrome on the first postransplant day with a crude survival of 75% in the recipient group (P = not significant [NS]).

Conclusion

We believe that the FAP liver graft is an excellent option for selected patients. Special care must be taken with thrombotic events.     

Insulin independence of unstable diabetic patient after single living donor islet transplantation

BACKGROUND: Current success in islet transplantation will lead to a donor shortage. Living donor islet transplantation could be an alternative approach to expand the potential donor pool. In this study we describe the first successful living donor islet transplantation for unstable diabetes, performed at Kyoto University Hospital on January 19, 2005. METHODS: The donor was a healthy 56-year-old woman and mother of the recipient. The recipient was a 27-year-old woman with insulin-dependent diabetes since the age of 15 years. She experienced frequent hypoglycemic unawareness episodes. Her blood glucose concentration was difficult to control and C-peptide level was negative after glucagon stimulation. She needed an average 28 of units of insulin per day. The donor underwent a distal pancreatectomy and islets were isolated from the resected pancreas graft. The total islet yield was 408,114 islet equivalents and isolated islets were immediately transplanted into the recipient's liver. RESULTS: After transplant, the blood glucose level of the recipient was tightly controlled without hypoglycemic episodes. She was discharged on day 37 with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The recipient remained insulin-independent for >3 months, since day 22 posttransplant. The donor's postoperative clinical course was uneventful. She was discharged on postoperative day 18 and returned to her job within 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first successful living donor islet transplantation for the treatment of unstable diabetes. We believe that living donor islet transplantation may become an option in the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes.     

Split liver transplantation

Greater experience and improved outcomes in liver transplantation have necessarily led to longer waiting lists against a constantly limited donor pool. Split liver transplantation has been conceived as a means to increase the supply of liver grafts. The bipartition of a whole liver provides grafts for two recipients in a complex operation with equally complex manpower and logistical demands. The in situ technique of splitting offers advantages over the ex vivo technique, although after the time-dependent learning curve is overcome, they may theoretically be used interchangeably with acceptable outcomes. Aside from surgical expertise, donor characteristics and recipient pre-transplant status are risk factors for survival. This review will address the salient aspects of split liver transplantation, summarize the world experience with this procedure and describe the preliminary attempts in Asia.     

Living donor liver paired exchange: A North American first

Paired organ exchange can be used to circumvent living donor-recipient ABO incompatibilities. Herein, we present the first case of successful liver paired exchange in North America. This 2-way swap required 4 simultaneous operations: 2 living donor hepatectomies and 2 living donor liver transplants. A nondirected anonymous living donor gift initiated this domino exchange, alleviating an ABO incompatibility in the other donor-recipient pair. With careful attention to ethical and logistical issues, paired liver exchange is a feasible option to expand the donor pool for incompatible living liver donor-recipient pairs.