The effect of anodal stimulation on V-V timing at varying V-V intervals

We studied the effect of anodal capture at the ring electrode of the right ventricular (RV) lead on interventricular (V-V) timing during biventricular (BiV) pacing, in which left ventricular (LV) pacing was preceding RV pacing. The V-V interval was programmed from 80 to 4 ms (LV first) in the LV unipolar (LV tip--generator can) followed by the LV tip-RV ring pacing configuration. In the LV unipolar configuration, V-V programming leads to a continuous change in morphology of the QRS complex according to a change in collision of both activation fronts. When using the LV tip-RV ring configuration with anodal capture at the RV ring electrode no change in QRS morphology was recorded varying the V-V interval from 80 to 60 and 40 ms. However, at V-V intervals between 20 and 4 ms a change in morphology of the QRS complex was recorded, which was due to additional cathodal stimulation of the RV tip electrode during RV stimulation.     

Ventricular activation sequence during left ventricular pacing promotes QRS complex oversensing in the atrial channel

Background: Left ventricular (LV)‐only pacing has a significant effect on delay in depolarization of parts of the ventricles that are likely oversensed in the right atrial channel. The study aimed to assess the impact of ventricular activation sequence on QRS oversensing and far‐field endless‐loop pacemaker tachycardia (ELT) in patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods: The study examined 102 patients with CRT devices. Oversensing artifacts in the atrial channel were inspected on intracardiac electrograms, and their timing with respect to the beginning of QRS was determined during DDD‐right ventricular (RV), DDD‐LV, DDD‐biventricular (BiV), and AAI pacing modes. The occurrence of ELT during DDD‐LV pacing with a postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) of 250 ms was also assessed. Results: The timing of oversensing artifacts (in relation to the beginning of surface QRS) was dependent on ventricular activation sequence, occurring promptly following intrinsic activation via the right bundle branch (47.1 ± 26.4 ms), later during RV pacing (108.7 ± 22.5 ms) or BiV pacing (109.4 ± 23.1 ms), and significantly later, corresponding to the final part of the QRS, during LV pacing (209.6 ± 40.0 ms, range: 140–340 ms, P < 0.001). Oversensing was significantly more frequent during LV than during RV pacing (35.3% vs 22.5%, P < 0.001). Far‐field ELT was observed in six patients. Conclusions: Oversensing artifacts in the atrial channel are likely caused by depolarization of the basal part of the right ventricle. The novel mechanism of QRS oversensing outside PVARP, caused by a reversed ventricular activation sequence during LV‐only pacing, may be important in some CRT patients. (PACE 2011; 34:1682–1686)     

Morphology of the RV electrogram during LV pacing is related to the hemodynamic effect in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: Biventricular (BiV) pacing and left ventricular (LV) pacing both improve LV function in patients with heart failure and LV dyssynchrony. We studied the hemodynamic effect of the atrioventricular (AV) interval and the associated changes in the right ventricular (RV) electrogram (EGM) during LV pacing and compared this with the hemodynamic effect of optimized sequential BiV pacing.
Methods: In 16 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV, sinus rhythm with normal AV conduction, left bundle branch block (LBBB), QRS > 130 ms, and optimal medical therapy, the changes in RV EGM during LV pacing with varying AV intervals were studied. The hemodynamic effect associated with these changes was evaluated by invasive measurement of LVdP/dt_max and compared with the result of optimized sequential BiV pacing in the same patient.
Results: All patients showed electrocardiographic fusion during LV pacing. The morphology of the RV EGM showed changes in the RV activation that indicated a shift in the extent of fusion from LV pacing. These changes were associated with significant changes in LVdP/dt_max. Baseline LV dP/dt_max was 734 ± 177 mmHg/s, which increased to 927 ± 202 mmHg/s (P<0.0001) with optimized LV pacing and to 920 ± 209 mmHg/s (P<0.0001) with optimized sequential BiV pacing.
Conclusion: The RV EGM is a proper indicator for intrinsic activation over the right bundle during LV pacing and reveals the transition to fusion in the RV EGM that is associated with a decrease in LVdP/dt_max. The hemodynamic effect of optimized LV pacing is equal to optimized sequential BiV pacing.     

Influence of Different Atrioventricular and Interventricular Delays on Cardiac Output During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Restoration of the atrioventricular (AVD) and interventricular (VVD) delays increases the hemodynamic benefit conferred by biventricular (BiV) stimulation. This study compared the effects of different AVD and VVD on cardiac output (CO) during three stimulation modes: BiV-LV = left ventricle (LV) preceding right ventricle (RV) by 4 ms; BiV-RV = RV preceding LV by 4 ms; LVP = single-site LV pacing. We studied 19 patients with chronic heart failure due to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, QRS ≥ 150 ms, mean LV end-diastolic diameter = 78 ± 7 mm, and mean LV ejection fraction = 21 ± 3%. CO was estimated by Doppler echocardiographic velocity time integral formula with sample volume placed in the LV outflow tract. Sets of sensed-AVDs (S-AVD) 90–160 ms, paced-AVDs (P-AVD) 120–160 ms, and VVDs 4–20 ms were used. BiV-RV resulted in lower CO than BiV-LV. S-AVD 120 ms and P-AVD 140 ms caused the most significant increase in CO for all three pacing modes. LVP produced a similar increase in CO as BiV stimulation; however, AV sequential pacing was associated with a nonsignificantly higher CO during LVP than with BiV stimulation. CO during BiV stimulation was the highest when LV preceded RV, and VVD ranged between 4 and 12 ms. The most negative effect on CO was observed when RV preceded LV by 4 ms. Hemodynamic improvement during BiV stimulation was dependent both on optimized AVD and VVD. LV preceding RV by 4–12 ms was the most optimal. Advancement of the RV was not beneficial in the majority of patients.     

超声心动图评价起搏模式及起搏部位对心脏再同步化治疗效果的影响

目的：评价超声心动图在心力衰竭患者心脏再同步化治疗（cardiac resynchronizatio therapy，CRT）中的应用价值，探讨起搏模式及起搏部位对其产生的影响。方法：34例患者植入双室起搏器后随机进行4种不同模式起搏（双腔起搏，左室起搏，右室起搏和不起搏即窦性心律状态）。行常规超声心动图及二维彩色组织多普勒（Doppler tissue imaging，DTI）检查，测量左室射血分数（LVEF）、每搏输出量（Sv）、节段心肌作功指数（MPIr）和每个节段心电图QRS波起始至该节段收缩达峰时间（Ts），并比较左室电极放置在不同位置对心功能的影响。结果：左室起搏和双腔起搏提高SV（均P〈0．02）和LVEF（均P〈0.001）。左室起搏和双腔起搏下左室节段MPIr改善（均P〈0．0001），下壁和前壁基底段Ts差缩短（均P〈0．0001）。电极放置在心脏侧后静脉或侧静脉时SV、LVEF和Ts较后静脉或前静脉明显改善。结论：左室起搏和双腔起搏可明显改善心力衰竭患者的心功能。超声心动图可以无创评价CRT治疗效果，并随访预后。     

Comparison of hemodynamic versus dyssynchrony assessment for interventricular delay optimization with echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: Best practice for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device optimization is not established. This study compared Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) to study left ventricular (LV) synchrony and left ventricular outflow tract velocity‐time integral (LVOT VTI) to assess hemodynamic performance. Methods: LVOT VTI and LV synchrony were tested in 50 patients at three interventricular (VV) delays (LV preactivation at ?30 ms, simultaneous biventricular pacing, and right ventricular preactivation at +30 ms), selecting the highest VTI and the greatest degree of superposition of the displacement curves, respectively, as the optimum VV delay. Results: In 39 patients (81%), both techniques agreed (Kappa = 0.65, p < 0.0001) on the optimum VV delay. LV preactivation (VV ? 30) was the interval most frequently chosen. Conclusions: Both TDI and LVOT VTI are useful CRT programming methods for VV optimization. The best hemodynamic response correlates with the best synchrony. In most patients, the optimum VV interval is LV preactivation. (PACE 2011; 34:984–990)     

Upgrading from Single Chamber Right Ventricular to Biventricular Pacing in Permanently Paced Patients with Worsening Heart Failure: The RD-CHF Study

Background: Biventricular (BiV) stimulation lowers morbidity and mortality in patients with drug-refractory congestive heart failure (CHF), depressed left ventricular (LV) function, and ventricular dyssynchrony in absence of indication for permanent cardiac pacing. This pilot, single-blind, randomized, cross-over study examined the safety and efficacy of upgrading conventional pacing systems to BiV stimulation in patients with advanced CHF .
Methods: We included 56 patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes III or IV despite optimal drug treatment and ventricular dyssynchrony (interventriclar delay >40 ms or LV preejection delay >140 ms) in need of pacemaker replacement. We compared the patients' functional status, arrhythmias, and standard echocardiographic measurements during 3 months of conventional, single right ventricular (RV) versus 3 months of BiV stimulation .
Results: There were 44 patients in the cross-over phase. QRS duration was shortened by 23% and LV preejection delay by 16% with BiV stimulation. NYHA functional class, 6-minute hall walk and quality of life score were significantly improved with BiV stimulation compared with single RV pacing by 18%, 29%, and 19%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the ventricular arrhythmia burden or LV reverse remodeling between the 2 periods .
Conclusions: This pilot study showed that upgrading from RV pacing to BiV pacing significantly improves symptoms and exercise tolerance in chronically paced patients with advanced CHF and mechanical dyssynchrony .     

Site‐Specific Differences in Latency Intervals during Biventricular Pacing: Impact on Paced QRS Morphology and Echo‐Optimized V‐V Interval

Objective: To investigate differences in latency intervals during right ventricular (RV) pacing and left ventricular (LV) pacing from the (postero‐)lateral cardiac vein in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients and their relationship to echo‐optimized interventricular (V‐V) intervals and paced QRS morphology. Methods: We recorded digital 12‐lead electrocardiograms in 40 CRT patients during RV, LV, and biventricular pacing at three output settings. Stimulus‐to‐earliest QRS deflection (latency) intervals were measured in all leads. Echocardiographic atrioventricular (AV) and V‐V optimization was performed using aortic velocity time integrals. Results: Latency intervals were longer during LV (34 ± 17, 29 ± 15, 28 ± 15 ms) versus RV apical pacing (17 ± 8, 15 ± 8, 13 ± 7 ms) for threshold, threshold ×3, and maximal output, respectively (P < 0.001), and shortened with increased stimulus strength (P < 0.05). The echo‐optimized V‐V interval was 58 ± 31 ms in five of 40 (12%) patients with LV latency ≥ 40 ms compared to 29 ± 20 ms in 35 patients with LV latency < 40 ms (P < 0.01). During simultaneous biventricular pacing, four of five (80%) patients with LV latency ≥ 40 ms exhibited a left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern in lead V₁ compared to three of 35 (9%) patients with LV latency < 40 ms (P < 0.01). After optimization, all five patients with LV latency ≥ 40 ms registered a dominant R wave in lead V₁. Conclusions: LV pacing from the lateral cardiac vein is associated with longer latency intervals than endocardial RV pacing. LV latency causes delayed LV activation and requires V‐V interval adjustment to improve hemodynamic response to CRT. Patients with LV latency ≥ 40 ms most often display an LBBB pattern in lead V₁ during simultaneous biventricular pacing, but a right bundle branch block after V‐V interval optimization. (PACE 2010; 1382–1391)     

Activation sequence modification during cardiac resynchronization by manipulation of left ventricular epicardial pacing stimulus strength

BACKGROUND: Success of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depends on altering electrical ventricular activation (VA) to achieve mechanical benefit. That increases in stimulus strength (SS) can affect VA has been demonstrated previously in cardiomyopathy patients undergoing ablation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increasing SS can alter VA during CRT. METHODS: In 71 patients with CRT devices, left ventricle (LV) pacing was performed at escalating SS. Timing from pacing stimulus to right ventricular (RV) electrogram, ECG morphology, and maximal QRS duration on 12 lead ECG were recorded. RESULTS: Demographics: Baseline QRS duration 153 +/- 25 ms, ischemic cardiomyopathy 48%, ejection fraction 24%+/- 7%. With increased SS, conduction time from LV to right ventricle (RV) decreased from 125 +/- 56 ms to 111 +/- 59 ms (P = 0.006). QRS duration decreased from 212 +/- 46 ms to 194 +/- 42 ms (P = 0.0002). A marked change in QRS morphology occurred in 11/71 patients (15%). The RV ring was the anode in 6, while the RV coil was the anode in 5. Sites with change in QRS morphology showed decrease in conduction time from LV to RV from 110 +/- 60 ms to 64 +/- 68 ms (P = 0.04). Twelve patients (16%) had diaphragmatic stimulation with increased SS. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing LV SS reduces QRS duration and conduction time from LV to RV. Recognition of significant QRS morphology change is likely clinically important during LV threshold programming to avoid unintended VA change.     

Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Nonapical Right Ventricular Leads

Background: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) capture is of paramount importance in patients with biventricular (BiV) pacing. Our goal was to identify electrocardiographic features that differentiate between BiV and right ventricular (RV)‐only pacing in patients with nonapical RV leads. Methods: The study enrolled 300 consecutive patients with BiV devices and nonapical RV leads, and obtained from them 558 electrocardiograms with either BiV pacing (n = 300) or RV‐only pacing (n = 258). RV pacing served as a surrogate for loss of LV capture. Electrocardiograms from the first 150 patients were used to identify BiV‐specific features, and to construct an algorithm to differentiate between BiV and RV‐only pacing. Electrocardiograms from the second 150 patients were used to validate the algorithm. Results: The following electrocardiographic features typical of BiV pacing were identified: QS in lead V6 (specificity = 98.7%, sensitivity = 54.7%), dominant R in lead V1 (specificity = 100%, sensitivity = 23.3%), q in lead V6 (specificity = 96%, sensitivity = 22.7%), and a QRS < 160 ms (specificity = 100%, sensitivity = 66.0%). The algorithm based on those features was found to have an overall diagnostic accuracy of 95.0%, a specificity of 96.0%, and a sensitivity of 93.5%. Conclusions: The study identified QRS features that were very specific for BiV pacing in patients with nonapical RV leads. Sequential arrangement of those features resulted in an algorithm that was very accurate for differentiating between BiV pacing and loss of LV capture. (PACE 2012; 35:1199–1208)     

Bifocal Right Ventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Therapies in Patients with Unsuccessful Percutaneous Lateral Left Ventricular Venous Access

Biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with a lateral left ventricular (LV) lead cannot always be achieved. We report a single center experience of CRT utilizing a protocol that specifically required the implantation of a bifocal right ventricular (RV) lead system when lateral LV pacing could not be achieved. Consecutive candidates for CRT were included in the study. If strict criteria for lateral LV pacing were not met, they underwent implantation of a bifocal RV lead system with two 7F, active fixation leads, one placed septally at the apex, and the other in the high septal outflow tract. All patients were followed for 12 months and the two groups were compared. A biventricular (BiV) stimulation system was implanted in 44 patients, and a bifocal RV system in six. The demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Both groups experienced a similar improvement in functional capacity, increase in 6 minutes walking distance, and decreased need for hospitalizations. The mean increase in LV ejection fraction was 11% in the bifocal RV group versus 10% in the BiV group. Though the tissue Doppler indices of LV synchrony improved earlier in the BiV group, (19% vs 10%) the improvement was similar in both groups at 6 months (23% vs 20%). The clinical improvements conferred by CRT can be matched by a bifocal RV system in selected patients. This alternate approach should be considered when implantation of a LV lateral lead was unsuccessful.     

The ECG Lead I Paradox in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the morphology of the QRS complex plays an important role in the determination of the pacing site and effectiveness of stimulation. Patients and Methods: Review of the electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 737 patients with a CRT device showed a negative QRS complex in lead I during right ventricular (RV) pacing and a positive QRS complex during left ventricular (LV) pacing in four patients. The RV lead was positioned in the high RV septum and the coronary sinus leads in a posterior or postero‐lateral basal level. Reversed ECG lead or pacemaker lead connection, anodal RV stimulation, and scar tissue‐related depolarization abnormalities were excluded as possible causes. Conclusion: Pacing from the high RV septum may rarely lead to a negative QRS complex and basal positions of the LV lead to a positive QRS complex in lead I during LV pacing. The lead I paradox becomes obvious when both phenomena, that are not interrelated, are present in the same patient.     

Invasive optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of sequential biventricular and left ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND: Aim of this invasive study was to characterize and quantify changes in left ventricular (LV) systolic function due to sequential biventricular pacing (BV) as compared to right atrial triggered simultaneous BV (BV(0)), LV, and right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: In 22 CHF patients, all in sinus rhythm, temporary multisite pacing was performed prior to implantation of a permanent system. LV systolic function was evaluated invasively by the maximum rate of LV pressure increase (dP/dt(max)). Sequential BV pacing was performed with preactivation of either ventricle at 20-80 ms. RESULTS: In comparison to RV pacing, LV and BV(0) pacing increased dP/dt(max) by 33.9 +/- 19.3% and 34.0 +/- 22.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). In 9 patients, optimized sequential BV pacing further improved dP/dt(max) by 8.5 +/- 4.8% compared to BV(0) (range 3.3-17.1, P < 0.05). In 10 patients exhibiting a PR interval < or =200 ms, LV pacing was either superior (n = 6) or equal to BV(0) pacing (n = 4). In these 10 patients, LV pacing yielded a 7.4 +/- 8.0% higher dP/dt(max) than BV(0) pacing (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using sequential BV pacing, generally with LV preactivation, moderate improvements in LV systolic function can be achieved in selected patients. Baseline PR interval may aid in the selection of the optimum cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) mode, favoring LV pacing in patients with a PR interval < or =200 ms.     

Greater three-dimensional ventricular lead tip separation is associated with improved outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: Effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is more likely with widely separated left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) pacing leads tips. We hypothesized that lead separation is an important factor in determining the clinical response to CRT. Methods: A retrospective study of 86 consecutive patients age 71 ± 10 years, male (74%), coronary disease (71%), atrial fibrillation (23%), LV ejection fraction (22 ± 9%), QRS duration (160 ± 27 ms), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III (81%), NYHA class IV (19%) undergoing CRT from January 2006 to September 2008. The median follow‐up was 12 months and clinical response to CRT was defined as reduction of NYHA class by one or more. The three‐dimensional separation between RV and LV pacing lead tips was calculated using measurements obtained from orthogonal posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs performed the day after implantation. Results: Fifty‐nine patients (69%) responded to CRT. There was a statistically significant association between increased three‐dimensional lead separation and clinical response to CRT (P= 0.005). Stronger association was obtained when lead separation was corrected for cardiac size (P= 0.001). A significantly higher response rate of 88% was achieved in patients with QRS duration of 160 ms or more, and lead separation of 100 mm or more compared with 60% when lead separation was less than 100 mm and QRS duration remained the same (P = 0.027). Conclusions: Greater three‐dimensional separation of LV‐to‐RV leads is associated with improved response to CRT. A prospective multicenter trial is needed to assess lead separation as a predictor for response. (PACE 2010; 33:1490–1496)     

Stimulation rate and the optimal interventricular interval during cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

Background: Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with respect to the interventricular (V‐V) interval is mainly limited to pacing at a resting heart rate. We studied the effect of higher stimulation rates with univentricular and biventricular (BiV) pacing modes including the effect of the V‐V interval optimization. Methods: In 36 patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of right ventricular (RV), left ventricular (LV), simultaneous BiV, and optimized sequential BiV (BiVopt) pacing were measured. The effect of the pacing mode and the optimal V‐V interval was determined at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm using invasive measurement of the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure rise (LV dP/dt_max). Results: The average LV dP/dt _max for all pacing modalities at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm was 781 ± 176, 833 ± 197, and 884 ± 223 mmHg/s for RV pacing; 893 ± 178, 942 ± 186, and 981 ± 194 mmHg/s for LV pacing; 904 ± 179, 973 ± 187, and 1052 ± 206 mmHg/s for simultaneous BiV pacing; and 941 ± 186, 1010 ± 198, and 1081 ± 206 mmHg/s for BiVopt pacing, respectively. In BiVopt pacing, the corresponding optimal V‐V interval decreased from 34 ± 29, 28 ± 28, and 21 ± 27 ms at stimulation rates of 70, 90, and 110 ppm, respectively . In two individuals, LV dP/dt_max decreased when the pacing rate was increased from 90 to 110 ppm. Conclusion: In patients with AF and heart failure, LV dP/dt_max increases for all pacing modalities at increasing stimulation rates in most, but not all, patients. The rise in LV dP/dt_max with increasing stimulation rates is higher in biventricular (BiV and BiVopt) than in univentricular (LV and RV) pacing. The optimal V‐V interval at sequential biventricular pacing decreases with increasing stimulation rates.     

Timing of the Left Ventricular Electrogram and Acute Hemodynamic Changes During Implant of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices

Study Objective: To examine the relationship between timing of the left ventricular (LV) electrogram (EGM) and its acute hemodynamic effect on instantaneous change in LV pressure (LVdP/dt_MAX).
Patients and Methods: In 30 patients (mean = age 67 ± 7.9 years) who underwent implant of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems, the right ventricular (RV) lead was implanted at the RV apex (n = 23) or RV septum (n = 7). The LV lead was placed in a posterior (n = 14) or posterolateral (n = 16) coronary sinus tributary. QRS duration, interval from Q wave to intrinsic deflection of the LV EGM (Q-LV), and interval between intrinsic deflection of RV EGM and LV EGM (RV-LV interval) were measured. The measurements were correlated with the hemodynamic effects of optimized biventricular (BiV) stimulation, using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: The mean LVdP/dt_MAX at baseline was 734 ± 180 mmHg/s, and increased to 905 ± 165 mmHg/s during simultaneous BiV pacing, and to 933 ± 172 mmHg/s after V-V interval optimization. The Pearson correlation coefficient R between QRS duration, the Q-LV interval, and the RV-LV interval at the respective LVdP/dt_MAX was 0.291 (P = 0.66), 0.348 (P = 0.030), and 0.340 (P = 0.033).
Conclusions: Similar significant correlations were observed between the acute hemodynamic effect of optimized BiV stimulation and the Q-LV and the RV-LV intervals. However, individual measurements showed an 80-ms cut-off for the Q-LV interval, beyond which the increase in LVdP/dt_MAX was <10%._.     

Evaluation of ventricular synchrony using novel Doppler echocardiographic indices in patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics in selected patients with heart failure. Mechanic asynchrony parameters that may guide patient selection or therapy optimization are still being investigated. A biventricular (BiV) pacemaker was implanted in 34 patients with dilated ischemic, idiopathic, or valvular cardiomyopathy, and a QRS duration of > or =130 milliseconds. Two-dimensional standard and Doppler tissue echocardiography was performed during right ventricular (RV), left ventricular (LV), BiV, and no pacing in a random and blinded manner. LV and BiV pacing increased stroke volume (P <.02 for both) and ejection fraction (P <.001 for both). Regional contractility assessed by displacement, strain rate, and peak systolic strain was improved in some segments (P <.05) during LV and BiV pacing. A homogenization of segmental contractions was observed during LV and BiV pacing as evaluated by net systolic displacement and segmental myocardial performance index. LV and BiV pacing provides benefits that can be quantified by echocardiography.     

Biventricular upgrading in patients with conventional pacing system and congestive heart failure: results and response predictors

BACKGROUND: There are few studies on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with preexisting right ventricular (RV) pacing. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of CRT upgrading in RV-paced patients and the predictivity of electromechanical dyssynchrony parameters (EDP) evaluated by standard echocardiography (ECHO) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with HF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, LVEF < 35%], prior continuous RV pacing, and absence of atrial fibrillation were enrolled in the presence of a paced QRS > or = 150 ms and evaluated by ECHO and TDI. A responder was defined as a patient with a favorable change in NYHA class and neither HF hospitalization nor death, plus an absolute increase of LVEF > or = 10 units. RESULTS: At six-months follow-up, the whole study population had significant improvement in symptoms, systolic function, and QRS duration (P < 0.001); 32 (84%) patients had a favorable clinical outcome, 25 (66%) were considered responders according to the previous definition. Postimplant QRS was similarly reduced in both responders and nonresponders, whereas EDP had a significant improvement only in responders (P < 0.05). Using EDP, 23 (79%) patients were responders compared with 2 (22%) patients without mechanical dyssynchrony (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In HF patients with previous RV pacing, CRT is effective to improve clinical, functional outcome, and LV performance and to reduce electromechanical dyssynchrony in a large proportion of patients. Dyssynchrony evaluated by standard and TDI ECHO can be useful for CRT selection of paced patients.     

Continuously adjusting CRT therapy: clinical impact of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-established therapy to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with moderate and severe symptomatic congestive heart failure. Left ventricular (LV) pacing that fuses with intrinsic right ventricular (RV) conduction results in similar or even better cardiac performance compared to biventricular (Biv) pacing. Optimal programming of the atrio-ventricular (AV) and inter-ventricular (VV) delays is crucial to improve LV performance since suboptimal programming of AV and VV delays affect LV filling as well as cardiac output. CRT optimization using echocardiogram is resource-dependent and time consuming. Adaptive CRT (aCRT) algorithm provides a dynamic, automatic, ambulatory adjustment of CRT pacing configuration (Biv or LV pacing) and optimization of AV and VV delays. aCRT algorithm is safe and efficacious for CRT-indicated patients without permanent atrial fibrillation. It has been shown to improve CRT response and reduce morbidity and mortality for patients with normal AV conduction.     

Optimal sensed atrio-ventricular interval determined by paced QRS morphology

BACKGROUND: In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the atrio-ventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) intervals have to be optimized. For maximal optimization, the paced and sensed AV intervals have to be determined. We hypothesized that the morphology of the paced QRS complex at the optimal paced AV interval (PAV) can be used to determine the optimal sensed AV (SAV) interval in patients with normal AV conduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 16 patients with implanted CRT devices, the optimal PAV and V-V interval were determined by invasive measurement of left ventricle (LV) dP/dt(max). A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded at the optimum setting. Subsequently, during atrial sensing ventricular pacing, the SAV interval was changed until the QRS morphology was identical to the morphology at the optimal PAV interval. The optimal SAV interval was verified by repeated measurement of LV dP/dt(max). RESULTS: By optimization of the PAV and VV interval, the LV dP/dt(max) increased from 639 +/- 204 to 789 +/- 223 mmHg/s (+23%; P = 0.0000002). The optimized PAV was 149 +/- 19 ms; the optimized SAV was 100 +/- 20 ms and the corresponding LV dP/dt(max) at this interval was 774 +/- 204 ms (+21%; P = 0.000004). LV dP/dt(max) at optimized SAV - 20 ms and optimized SAV + 20 ms was 747 +/- 213 mmHg/s (P = 0.00004) and 751 +/- 203 mmHg/s (P = 0.0000003), respectively. The mean difference in optimized PAV and optimized SAV was 49 +/- 17 ms, ranging from 20 to 80 ms. CONCLUSIONS: The QRS morphology at optimized PAV can be used as a template to determine the optimal SAV, provided that the patient has normal AV conduction.