Comparison of outcomes of white versus black patients hospitalized with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Black patients who have heart failure (HF) may have a larger proportion of HF with preserved ejection fraction (PEF) than white patients because of the greater prevalence and severity of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in blacks. However, studies have not systematically evaluated differences by race in patients who have HF-PEF compared with those who have systolic HF (SHF). Therefore, we examined baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes in patients who had HF-PEF compared with those who had SHF, with an emphasis on variation by race, in a biracial cohort of patients treated within the Veterans Health Administration health care system. In a cohort of 448 patients (192 blacks and 256 whites) hospitalized with HF, 27% had HF-PEF. The proportion of HF-PEF was similar in black (25%) and white (29%) patients (p = 0.4). Among patients who had SHF, black patients were younger, had lower prevalences of atrial fibrillation and diabetes, and had less co-morbidities than white patients, whereas there were no significant differences in these variables by race in patients who had HF-PEF. However, among patients who had SHF or HF-PEF, blacks had a lower prevalence of coronary disease, higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and higher serum levels of creatinine than white patients. In addition, mortality and readmission rates for HF did not differ by race among patients who had HF-PEF. Overall, patients who had HF-PEF had a high morbidity rate (30% patients were readmitted for HF in 相似文献   

Outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: mortality,readmission, and functional decline

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the six-month clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF), as the natural history of this condition has not been well established. We compared mortality, hospital readmission, and changes in functional status in patients with preserved versus depressed EF. BACKGROUND: Although the poor prognosis of HF with depressed EF has been extensively documented, there are only limited and conflicting data concerning clinical outcomes for patients with preserved EF. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 413 patients hospitalized for HF to determine whether EF >or=40% was an independent predictor of mortality, readmission, and the combined outcome of functional decline or death. RESULTS: After six months, 13% of patients with preserved EF died, compared with 21% of patients with depressed EF (p = 0.02). However, the rates of functional decline were similar among those with preserved and depressed EF (30% vs. 23%, respectively; p = 0.14). After adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, preserved EF was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 0.90; p = 0.02), but there was no difference in the risk of readmission (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.43; p = 0.96) or the odds of functional decline or death (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.72; p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure with preserved EF confers a considerable burden on patients, with the risk of readmission, disability, and symptoms subsequent to hospital discharge, comparable to that of HF patients with depressed EF.     

Prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in Latin American, Middle Eastern, and North African Regions in the I PREFER study (Identification of Patients With Heart Failure and PREserved Systolic Function: an epidemiological regional study)

The aims of the present study were to estimate the prevalence of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) in patients with HF and to compare their clinical characteristics with those with reduced ejection fraction in non-Western countries. The left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 45% if measured < 1 year before the visit was used to qualify the patients as having HF-PEF. Of the 2,536 consecutive outpatients with HF, 1990 (79%) had the EF values recorded. Of these patients, 1291 had HF-PEF, leading to an overall prevalence of 65% (95% confidence interval 63% to 67%). Compared to the patients with HF and a reduced ejection fraction, those with HF-PEF were more likely to be older (65 vs 62 years, p < 0.001), female (50% vs 28%, p < 0.001), and obese (39% vs 27%, p < 0.001). They more frequently had a history of hypertension (78% vs 53%, p < 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (29% vs 24%, p = 0.03) and less frequently had a history of myocardial infarction (21% vs 44%, p < 0.001). Only 29% of patients with HF-PEF and hypertension had optimal blood pressure control. Left ventricular hypertrophy was less frequent in those with HF-PEF (58% vs 69%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of HF-PEF was lower in the Middle East (41%), where coronary artery disease was more often found than in Latin America (69%) and North Africa (75%), where the rate of hypertension was greater. In conclusion, in the present diverse non-Western study, HF-PEF represented almost 2/3 of all HF cases in outpatients. HF-PEF mostly affects older patients, women, and the obese. Hypertension was the most frequently associated risk factor, highlighting the need for optimal blood pressure control.     

Comparison of morbidity in women versus men with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) constitute up to 30% to 50% of patients with HF, and HF-PEF affects women more often than men. Not much is known about the role of gender in the clinical presentation, symptoms, or disease severity of HF-PEF or about the contribution of these differences to gender differences in morbidity and mortality in patients with HF-PEF. This study examined gender differences in clinical presentation, hospitalization, and mortality in patients with HF-PEF (ejection fraction > or = 50%) enrolled in the ancillary arm of the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazards modeling. The study cohort included 719 patients (378 men, 341 women). At baseline, compared with men, women were older and had greater clinical severity of HF, as evidenced by worse New York Heart Association functional class, more frequent symptoms and signs of HF, and more treatment with diuretics. Ischemia was identified as the primary cause of HF in 46% of women and 56% of men (p = 0.01). During a median follow-up of 39 months, crude mortality was similar in women and men (24.6% and 24.3%, p = 0.93), but more women were hospitalized for HF (26.7% vs 15.9%, p <0.001). After adjustment for baseline differences, female gender was an independent predictor of lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.82), but HF hospitalization rates were similar between men and women (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.53). In conclusion, although the clinical manifestations of HF appear to be more severe in women with HF-PEF, after adjustment for baseline clinical differences, HF hospitalizations are not increased and survival expectancy is better for women compared with men.     

Comparison of one-year outcome (death and rehospitalization) in hospitalized heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >50% versus those with ejection fraction <50%

Heart failure (HF) with preserved systolic function (ejection fraction [EF] >50%) is common, yet no proven therapies exist. Large registries could shed light on what medications may or may not be useful to reduce hospitalization and mortality. The EFFECT Registry, which prospectively enrolled 9,943 patients admitted to the hospital for HF from 1999 to 2001 in 103 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, was used. Patients discharged alive were divided into those with EF >50% and EF <50%. Discharge medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, beta blockers [BBs], spironolactone, and digoxin) were examined for their association with HF rehospitalization or death during 1 year. In the HF group with EF >50% (n = 1,026), 199 patients died within 1 year and 349 patients died or were hospitalized for HF within 1 year. In the HF group with EF <50% (n = 1,898), 427 patients died and 720 patients died or were hospitalized for HF. In the HF group with EF >50%, 67% were administered an ACE inhibitor; 32%, a BB; 37%, digoxin; and 12%, spironolactone. No differences were seen in adjusted survival for any medications (ACE inhibitors, BBs, digoxin, or spironolactone) examined in the HF group with EF >50% despite an adjusted survival benefit with ACE inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.94), BBs (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89), and spironolactone (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98) in patients with low EF. In conclusion, none of the medications proved to improve outcomes in patients with HF with low EF showed an association with outcomes in patients with HF and EF >50%, highlighting the need for randomized trial evidence to define therapies that will be beneficial in patients with HF and preserved systolic function.     

Relationship of serum sodium concentration to mortality in a wide spectrum of heart failure patients with preserved and with reduced ejection fraction: an individual patient data meta-analysis{dagger}: Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic heart failure (MAGGIC)

AIMS: Hyponatraemia has been associated with reduced survival in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF). The relationship between serum sodium and outcome is unclear in heart failure with preserved (≥50%) ejection fraction (HF-PEF). Therefore, we used a large individual patient data meta-analysis to study the risk of death associated with hyponatraemia in HF-REF and in HF-PEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis included 14 766 patients from 22 studies that recruited patients without ejection fraction inclusion criterion at baseline and reported death from any cause. Cox proportional analysis was undertaken for hyponatraemia (sodium <135 mmol/L), adjusted for variables of clinical relevance, and stratified by study. The endpoint was death from any cause at 3 years. Patients with hyponatraemia (n = 1618) and patients with normal serum sodium had similar characteristics as regards to age, gender, and ischaemic aetiology. However, patients with hyponatraemia had higher New York Heart Association class and lower blood pressure. At follow-up, there were 335 deaths among 1618 patients with hyponatraemia (21%) and 2128 deaths among 13 148 patients with normal serum sodium (16%). The risk of death appeared to increase linearly with serum sodium levels <140 mmol/L. Hyponatraemia was identified in 1199 HF-REF patients (11%) and 419 HF-PEF patients (11%). Hyponatraemia was independently predictive of death in both HF-REF [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50-1.91] and HF-PEF (adjusted HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.79, P for interaction 0.20). CONCLUSION: Hyponatraemia is a powerful determinant of mortality in patients with HF regardless of ejection fraction. Further work is needed to determine if correction of hyponatraemia translates into clinical benefit.     

Advances in the treatment of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) occurs in approximately 50% of patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. A recent study demonstrated that, although survival improved significantly over time among HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF), there was no such trend toward improvement among patients with HF-PEF. Therefore, there exists an urgent need to develop effective treatment strategies specifically for patients with HF-PEF. Recently completed and ongoing research in the treatment of HF-PEF is reviewed in this article. RECENT FINDINGS: The two large randomized clinical trials completed in HF-PEF patients did not achieve statistical significance in benefit of renin-angiotensin system blockade on their primary combined endpoints of morbidity and mortality. Both trials, however, suggested the benefit of the angiotensin receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme blockade on HF hospitalization. In addition, no clear benefit of beta-blockers has been demonstrated specifically in patients with HF-PEF. SUMMARY: Current therapeutic recommendations for HF-PEF are aimed mostly at symptomatic management and treatment of concomitant comorbidities. Results of ongoing clinical trials further evaluating inhibition of the angiotensin and the aldosterone receptors as well as examining other novel therapeutic targets in HF-PEF are keenly awaited.     

Predictors of mortality in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial.

OBJECTIVES: We identified predictors of mortality in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF) and clinical heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Although diastolic HF is common, the factors that predict mortality have not been clearly defined. METHODS: We studied 988 patients with HF and preserved EF enrolled in the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial. Survival analyses were employed to identify variables associated with mortality. RESULTS: During 3.1 years of follow-up, 231 (23%) patients died. Among 18 variables considered, the strongest independent predictors of death were glomerular filtration rate (adjusted hazard ratio for one standard deviation decrease 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35 to 1.67, p < 0.0001), New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (adjusted hazard ratio 1.64, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.18, p = 0.0011), male gender (adjusted hazard ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.32, p = 0.0005), and older age (adjusted hazard ratio for one standard deviation increase of age2 1.28, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.50, p = 0.0019). A risk score was developed to estimate long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic HF is associated with a high death rate. Important predictors of death include impaired renal function, worse functional class, male gender, and older age.     

Chronic heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: diagnostic and prognostic value of left atrial size

BACKGROUND: Almost 40% of patients with heart failure (HF) have preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and prognosis similar to those with reduced EF. Data on prognostic markers in such patients are limited. We analyzed the prevalence and prognostic value of left atrial (LA) size in this condition. METHODS: 89 normal subjects (Group I), 38 asymptomatic hypertensive patients (Group II) and 183 HF patients with preserved EF (EF >45%) (Group III) were studied. LA diameter (LAD), LV diastolic (LVD) and systolic (LVS) dimensions and mass (LVmass) and EF were measured. E and A wave velocities and E/A were measured. The primary end point was all cause mortality in group III patients. RESULTS: Groups did not differ in age, gender or EF. Group III patients had larger LAD (4.6+-1.0 cm) compared with both Group I (3.7+/-0.6) and Group II (3.7+/-0.5 cm) (p<0.0001). A markedly enlarged (arbitrarily defined as LAD higher or equal 5 cm) had an odds ratio of 34 (95% CI 8-144) in distinguishing HF patients from normals. After a mean follow-up period of 29+/-27 months, 40 patients (21.9%) died. In Cox univariate analysis, NYHA class (HR 2.8 95% C.I. 1.8-4.3; p<0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (HR 0.92 95% C.I. 0.88-0.96; p<0.0001), age (HR 1.059 95% C.I. 1.01-1.11; p=0.02) and LAD (HR 1.72 95% C.I. 1.27-2.3; p=0.0005) were predictors of mortality. LAD predicted survival independently of other variables. CONCLUSION: The left atrium is frequently dilated in HF patients compared with controls despite similar EF. LAD showed powerful prognostic value independent of clinical variables.     

Systolic function as a predictor of mortality and quality of life in long-term survivors with heart failure

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF) have been shown to have high mortality rates, comparable to those with reduced EF. Thus, long-term survivors of HF, regardless of ejection fraction, are a select group. Little is known about disease-related quality of life (QOL) and health status in these patients. HYPOTHESIS: Preserved EF in patients with heart failure independently predicts long-term survival, health related quality of life (QOL), or functional status. METHODS: The study followed a cohort of 413 patients consecutively hospitalized for HF between March 1996 and September 1998. In July 2005, information was collected about their mortality, health related QOL as defined by disease-specific Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, and functional decline as defined by limitations in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores. RESULTS: The primary outcomes were mortality, QOL, and functional decline. At follow-up, 8.1 years after enrollment, overall mortality was 76% (314/413). Adjusted for age, gender, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, HF, and respiratory disease, those with decreased ejection fraction (EF < 40%) had higher mortality compared with those with preserved ejection fraction (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; confidence interval [CI] = 1.13, 1.80, p = 0.003). The KCCQ scores, including Clinical Summary Scores and Symptom Limitation Scores, as well as ADL limitations, were not significantly different in the survivors with preserved or decreased EF. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients with preserved EF have a modest survival advantage compared with those with decreased EF, but health related QOL scores and functional decline in survivors are similar regardless of systolic function.     

Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program, which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and a broad range of ejection fractions (EFs). BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of adverse CV outcomes in patients with CHF and reduced EF. The risk of AF in patients with CHF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (PEF) is unknown. METHODS: A total of 7,599 patients with symptomatic CHF were randomized to candesartan or placebo. Patients were divided by baseline EF (< or =40% or >40%) in low or preserved EF groups. Major outcomes were cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Median follow-up was 37.7 months. RESULTS: A total of 670 (17%) patients in the low EF group and 478 (19%) in the PEF group had AF at baseline. Atrial fibrillation predicted a high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality regardless of baseline EF. Patients with AF and low EF had the highest absolute risk for adverse CV outcomes. However, AF was associated with greater relative increased risk of the major outcomes in patients with PEF than in patients with low EF: hazard ratio 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 2.06) versus 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.46), respectively. The same was true for the risk of all-cause mortality. Candesartan was associated with similar treatment effects regardless of baseline rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of CV outcomes in patients with CHF and either reduced EF or PEF. Candesartan improved outcomes similarly regardless of baseline rhythm.     

The prognostic value of estimated creatinine clearance alongside functional capacity in ambulatory patients with chronic congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) in relation to 6-min walk distance in ambulatory patients with congestive heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Although measurement of renal function is integral to the management of chronic congestive HF, its prognostic implications are not well described and have not been formally evaluated relative to measures of functional capacity. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes of the 585 participants of the 6-min walk substudy of the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial. The CrCl was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Predictors of all-cause mortality were identified using semiparametric Cox proportional hazards regression and completely parametric hazard analyses. RESULTS: Most subjects (85%) were New York Heart Association functional class II and III. Mean age was 65 (+/-12) years and mean ejection fraction (EF) 35% (+/-13%). There were 153 (26%) deaths during a median of 2.6 years of follow-up. Mortality by increasing quartiles of estimated CrCl was 37% (18 to 48 ml/min), 29% (47 to 64 ml/min), 18% (64 to 86 ml/min), and 21% (86 to 194 ml/min) with corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) relative to the top quartile of 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 3.3), 1.6 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.5), respectively. In Cox regression analyses, independent predictors of mortality were estimated CrCl (adjusted HR [quartile 1:quartile 4] 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.1), 6-min walk distance < or =262 m [adjusted HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.27]), EF, recent hospitalization for worsening HF, and need for diuretic treatment. Parametric (hazard) analysis confirmed consistent effects of estimated CrCl on mortality in several subgroups including that of patients with EF >45%. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory patients with congestive HF, estimated CrCl predicts all-cause mortality independently of established prognostic variables.     

Correlates and outcomes of preserved left ventricular systolic function among older adults hospitalized with heart failure

Background Heart failure (HF) in older adults is often associated with preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVSF). The objective of this retrospective follow-up study was to determine the correlates and outcomes of preserved LVSF among older adults hospitalized with HF. Methods We studied older Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with HF (n = 1091) who had documented LVSF evaluation (n = 438). LVSF was defined as preserved if left ventricular ejection fraction was ≥40%. The Fisher exact test and the Student t test were used to compare baseline characteristics between patients with preserved versus those with impaired LVSF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the correlates of preserved LVSF. Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine the associations between LVSF and both 4-year mortality rates and 6-month readmission rates and the associations between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use and 4-year mortality rates, separately, in patients with preserved and impaired LVSF. Results Of the 438 patients, 200 (46%) had preserved LVSF. Women were more likely to have preserved LVSF (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44, 95% CI 1.57-3.81) than men. Preserved LVSF was associated with lower 4-year mortality rates (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86) but not with 6-month readmission rates (adjusted HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.41-1.09). The use of ACE inhibitors was associated with lower 4-year mortality rates in patients with impaired LVSF (adjusted HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.86) but not in those with preserved LVSF (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.42). Conclusions Among older adults hospitalized with HF, preserved LVSF was common among women and was associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates, which were unaffected by treatment with ACE inhibitors. (Am Heart J 2002;144:365-72.)     

Baseline Plasma NT-proBNP and Clinical Characteristics: Results From the Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Trial

BackgroundN-terminal B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is usually elevated in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Less is known about NT-proBNP in HF with preserved EF (HF-PEF). We measured baseline NT-proBNP in 3562 HF-PEF enrolled patients in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction trial.Methods and ResultsPatients with EF ≥45%, age ≥60 years, and either New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV symptoms with HF hospitalization (HFH) within 6 months or NYHA III-IV symptoms with corroborative evidence of HF or structural changes associated with HF-PEF. NT-proBNP (pg/mL) measured centrally using the Elecsys proBNP assay (Roche). Mean age 72 ± 7 years, 60% were women, the investigator indicated HF etiology was hypertension in 64%; the majority were in NYHA III. Medications included diuretics in 82%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in 26%, β-blocker in 59%, and spironolactone in 15%. Median NT-proBNP was 341 pg/mL (interquartile range 135 to 974 pg/mL) and geometric mean was 354 pg/mL. In multivariate analysis, the baseline characteristics most strongly associated with higher NT-proBNP levels were atrial fibrillation (ratio of geometric mean 2.59, P < .001), NYHA IV symptoms (1.52, P < .001), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (1.44, P < .001), and HFH hospitalization within 6 months (1.37, P < .001).ConclusionsMost HF-PEF patients have elevated NT-proBNP levels. The NT-proBNP concentrations were related to baseline characteristics generally associated with worse outcomes for HF patients.     

The Effect of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundAlthough renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors have little demonstrable effect on mortality in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF), some trials have suggested a benefit with regard to reduction in HF hospitalization.Methods and ResultsHere, we systematically review and evaluate prospective clinical studies of RAS inhibitors enrolling patients with HF-PEF, including the 3 major trials of RAS inhibition (Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [CHARM-Preserved], Irbesartan in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction [I-PRESERVE], and Perindopril in Elderly People with Chronic Heart Failure [PEP-CHF]). We also conducted a pooled analysis of 8021 patients in the 3 major randomized trials of RAS inhibition in HF-PEF (CHARM-Preserved, I-PRESERVE, and PEP-CHF) in fixed-effect models, finding no clear benefit with regard to all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.15; P = .62), or HF hospitalization (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.02; P = .09).ConclusionsAlthough RAS inhibition may be valuable in the management of comorbidities related to HF-PEF, RAS inhibition in HF-PEF is not associated with consistent reduction in HF hospitalization or mortality in this emerging cohort.     

Treatment of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Opinion statement  Of the more than 5 million Americans who have heart failure (HF), 30% to 50% have HF with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF). HF-PEF commonly occurs in elderly patients, especially women, with comorbidities of hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes, myocardial ischemia, and obesity. HF-PEF is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although two large multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with HFPEF did not demonstrate any statistically significant benefit in their primary end points, they did suggest that these agents may have a modest role in reducing HF hospitalizations. Although calcium channel blockers and β-blockers may be of benefit in patients with HF-PEF, large clinical trial data are not available to support their routine use in all patients with HF-PEF. Subgroup analysis does not support the use of digoxin in patients with HF-PEF in sinus rhythm. Current therapeutic recommendations for HF-PEF are aimed at 1) management of HF symptoms with sodium and fluid restriction along with diuretics for volume overload and 2) treatment of concomitant comorbidities, especially hypertension, rate and possibly rhythm control of atrial fibrillation, and evaluation and treatment of myocardial ischemia and anemia. ACEIs, ARBs, calcium channel blockers, and β-blockers are recommended for HF-PEF patients who have other established indications for their use. Results are awaited from ongoing clinical trials with another ARB, irbesartan, and an aldosterone blocker, spironolactone.     

Influence of diabetes on cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator in patients with advanced heart failure

ObjectivesWe performed a post hoc analysis to determine the influence of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) or without a defibrillator (CRT-P) on outcomes among diabetic patients with advanced heart failure (HF).BackgroundIn patients with systolic HF, diabetes is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. No data are available on its impact on CRT-D or CRT-P in advanced HF.MethodsThe database of the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure trial was examined to determine the influence of CRT (CRT-D and CRT-P) on outcomes among diabetic patients. All-cause mortality or hospitalization, all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization, all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality were analyzed among diabetic patients (n = 622). A Cox proportional hazard model, adjusting for age, gender, New York Heart Association, ischemic status, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart rate, QRS, left or right bundle branch block, blood pressure, comorbidities (renal failure, carotid artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, coronary artery bypass grafting, and atrial fibrillation), medications, and device (with or without defibrillator), was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and significance.ResultsThe overall outcome of diabetic patients was similar to that of nondiabetic patients in the optimal pharmacologic therapy arm. With CRT, diabetic patients experienced a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 62–0.97), all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.53–0.85), all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.40–0.69), and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.99) compared with optimal pharmacologic therapy. Procedure-related complications and length of stay were identical in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.ConclusionIn diabetic patients with advanced HF, there is a substantial benefit from device therapy with significant improvement in all end points.     

Predictors of Mortality in Patients With an Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Many current predictors of mortality in heart failure (HF) were evaluated before the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We conducted a meta-analysis to identify factors associated with mortality in ICD-HF patients.

Methods

We searched in MedLine, EMBASE, and CINAHL in May 2012. Two reviewers selected citations that included ambulatory ICD patients and addressed the association between any predictor and mortality using multivariable regression. We meta-analyzed mortality using random-effects models.

Results

Of 10,420 studies reviewed, 72 studies evaluating 63 predictors on 257,692 ICD patients proved eligible. High confidence in estimates was found for age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45 for 10-year increase; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.56), baseline glomerular filtration rate (HR, 1.25 for 15-mL/min decrease; 95% CI, 1.15-1.35), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.38-1.71), diabetes (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.37-1.79), peripheral vascular disease (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.2-1.72), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR, 0.77 for 10% increase; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83), and appropriate or inappropriate ICD shocks (HR, 2.34; 95% CI 1.59-3.44) New York Heart Association class, atrial fibrillation, and congestive HF were strongly associated with mortality but the confidence in estimates was low. Ischemic cardiomyopathy and male sex were not independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis identified strong reliable mortality predictors in ICD-HF patients. Age, renal dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, and ICD shocks during follow-up were strong predictors of mortality; ischemic cardiomyopathy and male sex were not. Further research is needed to study other potential predictors, particularly biomarkers.     

Diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved systolic function: need for objective evidence:results from the CHARM Echocardiographic Substudy-CHARMES.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that diastolic dysfunction (DD) was an important predictor of cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization in a subset of patients (ejection fraction [EF] >40%) in the CHARM-Preserved study. BACKGROUND: More than 40% of hospitalized patients with HF have preserved systolic function (HF-PSF), suggesting that DD may be responsible for the clinical manifestations of HF. METHODS: Patients underwent Doppler echocardiographic examination that included assessment of pulmonary venous flow or determination of plasma NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide > or months after randomization to candesartan or placebo. The patients were classified into 1 of 4 diastolic function groups: normal, relaxation abnormality (mild dysfunction), pseudonormal (moderate dysfunction), and restrictive (severe dysfunction). RESULTS: There were 312 patients in the study, mean age was 66 +/- 11 years, EF was 50 +/- 10%, and 34% were women. The median follow-up was 18.7 months. Diastolic dysfunction was found in 67% of classified patients (n = 293), and moderate and severe DD were identified in 44%. Moderate and severe DD had a poor outcome compared with normal and mild DD (18% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). Diastolic dysfunction, age, diabetes, previous HF, and atrial fibrillation were univariate predictors of outcome. In multivariate analysis, moderate (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 11.1) and severe DD (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 24.0) remained the only independent predictors (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Objective evidence of DD was found in two-thirds of HF-PSF patients. Moderate and severe DD, which were found in less than one-half of the patients, were important predictors of adverse outcome. The results demonstrate the prognostic significance and need for objective evidence of DD in HF-PSF patients.