Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: six month results of a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term angiographic, clinical and economic outcome of direct stenting vs stenting after balloon predilatation. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS: Four hundred patients with coronary stenoses in a single native vessel were randomized to direct stenting vs stenting after predilatation. A major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) was defined as death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target restenosis, repeat target- and non-target vessel-related percutaneous coronary intervention, target lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass surgery and stroke. RESULTS: Stents were successfully implanted in 98.3% of patients randomized to direct stenting vs 97.8% randomized to stenting preceded by predilatation. The primary success rate of direct stenting was 88.3%, vs 97.8% for stenting preceded by balloon dilatation (P=0.01). The angiographic follow-up at 6 months included 333 of the 400 patients (83%). The binary in-stent restenosis rate was 23.1% of 163 patients randomized to direct stenting vs 18.8% of 166 patients randomized to balloon predilatation (P=0.32). By 185+/-25 days, MACCE had occurred in 31 of 200 (15.5%) patients randomized to direct stenting, vs 33 of 200 (16.5%) randomized to predilatation (P=0.89). At 6 months, costs associated with the direct stenting strategy (Euros 3222/patient) were similar to those associated with predilatation (Euros 3428/patient, P=0.43). However, procedural costs were significantly lower. It is noteworthy that, on multivariate analysis, a baseline C-reactive protein level >10 mg l(-1)was a predictor of restenosis (odds ratio: 2.10, P=0.025) as well as of MACCE (odds ratio: 1.94, P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to stenting preceded by balloon predilatation, direct stenting was associated with similar 6-month restenosis and MACCE rates. Procedural, but not overall 6-month costs, were reduced by direct stenting. An increased baseline CRP level was an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome after coronary stent implantation.     

Lack of effect of oral beta-blocker therapy at discharge on long-term clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Beta-blocker therapy is recommended after ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) in current guidelines, although its efficacy in those patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been adequately evaluated. Of 12,824 consecutive patients who underwent sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in the J-Cypher registry, we identified 910 patients who underwent PCI within 24 hours from onset of STEMI. Three-year outcomes were evaluated according to use of β blockers at hospital discharge (349 patients in β-blocker group and 561 patients in no-β-blocker group). Patients in the β-blocker group more frequently had hypertension, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a left anterior descending artery infarct, and statin use than those in the no-β-blocker group. No difference was observed between the β-blocker and no-β-blocker groups in mortality (6.6% vs 6.6%, p = 0.85; propensity score adjusted hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 1.90, p = 0.70) or in incidence of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and heart failure hospitalization, 13.5% vs 12.1%, p = 0.91; hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.66, p = 0.53). Better outcomes were observed in the β-blocker group than in the no-β-blocker group in a subgroup of patients with LVEF ≤40% (n = 125, death 6.4% vs 17.4%, p = 0.04; major adverse cardiac events 14.5% vs 31.8%, p = 0.009). In conclusion, β-blocker therapy was not associated with better 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI and had preserved LVEF.     

A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether direct stenting might prevent the adverse events associated with stent implantation during primary angioplasty and to compare it with conventional stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: No trial has demonstrated that stents favorably influence mortality rate. Recent studies have even suggested a negative impact of stents on coronary blood flow and clinical outcome. METHODS: Of 409 patients treated by primary angioplasty with stent implantation in our center, 206 (50%) were enrolled in this randomized, single-center trial and allocated to direct stent implantation (n = 102) or stent implantation after balloon pre-dilation (n = 104). The study end points included angiographic results (final corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] frame count and a composite end point of slow and no-reflow or distal embolization), an electrocardiogram marker of myocardial reperfusion assessment (ST-segment resolution) and in-hospital clinical outcome (death and recurrent infarction). RESULTS: Direct stent implantation failed in eight patients but succeeded after pre-dilation in all. A non-significant increase in TIMI flow grade 3 was achieved after direct stenting (95.1% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.74) without significant difference in the corrected TIMI frame count (31.5 +/- 17 and 35.2 +/- 20 frames after direct and conventional stent, respectively, p = 0.42). The composite angiographic end point was significantly reduced by direct stent implantation (11.7% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.01). ST-segment resolution was also significantly improved after direct stent (no ST-segment resolution in 20.2% vs. 38.1% after direct and conventional stent, respectively, p = 0.01). Death and/or recurrent infarction occurred in six patients after conventional stent implantation and in two patients after direct stenting (p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with AMI, direct stenting can be applied safely and effectively. This strategy may result in a significant reduction of microvascular injury, as suggested by improved ST-segment resolution after reperfusion with major potential clinical consequences.     

Catheter-based reperfusion of unprotected left main stenosis during an acute myocardial infarction (the ULTIMA experience). Unprotected Left Main Trunk Intervention Multi-center Assessment.

The ULTIMA registry was a prospective, multicenter, international registry of 277 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions of unprotected left main trunk stenosis. The 40 patients who underwent an emergency percutaneous left main intervention for acute myocardial infarction are the focus of this study. We compared the results of primary angioplasty with primary stenting, characterizing both the short-term (in-hospital) and long-term (12-month) outcomes. Of the 40 patients, 23 underwent primary angioplasty, whereas 17 underwent primary stenting. The angiographic success rate was an 88% for the cohort. The in-hospital death or coronary artery bypass grafting rate was 65% for the entire group, 74% for the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group (PTCA), and 53% for the stent group (p = 0.2). The in-hospital death rate was 55% for the entire cohort, 70% for the PTCA group, and 35% for the stent group (p = 0.1). The 12-month rate of death or bypass surgery was 83% and 58% for the PTCA and stent groups, respectively (p = 0.047). The 12-month survival rate was 35% and 53% for the PTCA and stent groups, respectively (p = 0.18). Bypass surgery was required in 6 patients in the PTCA group and 2 patients in the stent group (p = 0.07). Patients undergoing percutaneous interventions for unprotected left main myocardial stenosis during an acute myocardial infarction are critically ill; an initial percutaneous revascularization approach appears feasible and may be the preferred revascularization strategy. Primary stenting was associated with improved clinical outcomes.     

Impact of smoking on outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial)

We assessed the impact of smoking on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention using alternative antithrombotic regimens and stent types. In the HORIZONS-AMI trial 3,602 patients were randomly assigned to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) or bivalirudin alone and paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. Compared to nonsmokers, smokers had significantly lower rates of mortality and major bleeding at 30 days and at 1 year; however, the differences were no longer significant after covariate adjustment. Smoking was associated with increased rates of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year (adjusted RR 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 3.10) mainly because of a higher rate of late ST after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (1.9% vs 0.4%, p = 0.0006). In smokers bivalirudin monotherapy compared to UFH plus a GPI was associated with lower mortality at 30 days (0.5% vs 2.2%, p = 0.002) and at 1 year (1.8% vs 4.0%, p = 0.008). No decrease in mortality was seen with bivalirudin in nonsmokers. Major bleeding was significantly decreased with bivalirudin regardless of smoking status (smokers 3.7% vs 8.9%, p <0.0001; nonsmokers 6.5% vs 9.6%, p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, smoking is an independent predictor of definite/probable ST at 1 year. Bivalirudin monotherapy compared to UFH plus a GPI decreased major bleeding regardless of smoking status but may have different effects on individual components of ischemic events.     

Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

ST-segment resolution (STR) is a surrogate end point in reperfusion trials of acute myocardial infarction, but there are few data regarding the optimum methods of measurement, clinical predictors, and correlation with late cardiac mortality. Consecutive patients (n = 1,005) who had acute myocardial infarction and >/=2 mm ST-segment elevation controlled with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) constituted our study group. Follow-up was obtained in 97% of patients at a median of 6.2 years. STR measured as maximum ST-segment elevation after PCI provided better discrimination of late cardiac mortality than did STR measured as percent resolution. Complete STR (<1.0 mm ST-segment elevation after PCI) was achieved in only 42% of patients. Anterior infarction, Killip's class 3 to 4, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grades <2 before PCI and <3 after PCI were strong independent predictors of partial or poor STR. STR (complete [<1.0 mm] vs partial [1.0 to 2.0 mm] vs poor [>2.0 mm]) correlated with in-hospital mortality (4.0% vs 6.7% vs 11.6%, p = 0.005), reinfarction (1.4% vs 3.4% vs 6.1%, p = 0.01), and late cardiac mortality (17% vs 25% vs 44%, p <0.0001). Correlation with late mortality was stronger for nonanterior than for anterior infarction. Poor STR was a strong independent predictor of late mortality (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.50, p = 0.028), even after adjusting for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow. These data support the use of STR as a simple method to stratify patients by risk after primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction and support the use of STR as a surrogate end point in reperfusion trials of acute myocardial infarction.     

Comparison of five-year outcomes of patients with and without chronic total occlusion of noninfarct coronary artery after primary coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of concurrent chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a noninfarct-related artery (IRA) on the long-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease. Of 1,658 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 666 with multivessel coronary disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from 1999 to 2004 were included in the present analysis. The patients were divided into 2 groups: no CTO and CTO. The first group included 462 patients without CTO (69%) and the second group included 204 patients with CTO in a non-IRA (31%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.3% and 21.1% (p < 0.0001) and the 5-year mortality rate was 22.5% and 40.2% (p < 0.0001) for the no-CTO and CTO patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that after correction for baseline differences CTO in a non-IRA was a strong, independent predictor of 5-year mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (hazard ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 2.53; p = 0.0001). In conclusion, the presence of CTO in a non-IRA in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease is a strong and independent risk factor for greater 5-year mortality.     

Direct versus conventional stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome just before the era of drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND: Direct stent implantation in patients, who undergo elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be performed with a high success rate and clinical results that are comparable to those after predilatation. It was the aim of this prospective study to compare clinical, angiographic and procedural parameter of direct stent implantation (DS) and conventional stent implantation (CS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 194 patients with ACS (ST-elevation myocardial infarction 66%, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction 18%, unstable angina 16%), in whom primary PCI was performed between January and December 2002. In 156 (80%) patients glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered during the procedure. In 73 patients (38%) direct stent implantation could be performed successfully. In 12 patients (6%) direct stent implantation failed due to the inability to pass the stenosis. In 121 patients (62%) the stent was implanted after predilatation. RESULTS: The clinical parameters were comparable in both groups. Reference luminal diameter before stent implantation did not differ in both groups (DS 3.01+/-0.54 vs. CS 2.84+/-0.43 mm). The final minimal luminal diameter was significantly higher in the DS group (DS 2.95+/-0.45 vs. CS 2.77+/-0.47 mm, p=0.01). The procedural time (DS 41.0+/-14.1 vs. CS 46.8+/-16.9 min, p=0.02), radiation exposure time (DS 7.3+/-4.6 vs. CS 8.9+/-4.6 min, p=0.002) and the amount of contrast agent (DS 216+/-90 vs. CS 235+/-79 ml, p=0.03) could be decreased by the technique of direct stent implantation. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, CABG) during hospitalization was 4.1% in the DS group and 11.5% in the CS group (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Direct stent implantation is safe and feasible in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The procedural time, radiation exposure time and the amount of contrast agent can be significantly decreased using the technique of direct stent implantation. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was not significantly different in this subset of patients.     

Comparison of mortality rates in women versus men presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Women who present with coronary artery disease have different characteristics, undergo different treatment, and have a different prognosis than men. The increasing use of coronary stenting has improved the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, little is known about the outcomes for men versus women after PCI, especially for those presenting with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Thus, we compared the baseline features, management, and long-term outlook of men versus women undergoing PCI. All consecutive patients who had undergone PCI with stents at our center from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2004 were identified retrospectively. The primary end point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events (i.e., death, infarction, and repeat revascularization). The secondary end points were the individual components of the major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis. A total of 833 patients were included, 210 women (25.2%) and 623 men (75.8%). The women were significantly older (70.9 vs 63 years, p <0.001) and more often had diabetes mellitus (36.2% vs 21.0%, p <0.001) and hypertension (82.3% vs 73.7%, p = 0.006). The number of drug-eluting stents and the length were significantly lower in the female patients. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events after a median follow-up of 60 months was similar for both women and men (38.8% vs 46.4%, p = 0.075), with a trend toward greater mortality rate for women (21.2% vs 15.4%, p = 0.090). All other end points occurred with similar frequencies. Only in the subgroup of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were the rates of death significantly greater for the women than for the men (20.0% vs 8.1%; p = 0.029). In conclusion, very long-term follow-up of women undergoing PCI with coronary artery stenting resulted in similar rates of cardiac event compared to those of men, but greater care should be given to women presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Also, despite their greater baseline risk profile, women were significantly less likely to have received effective treatment, the use of including drug-eluting stents.     

Major adverse upper gastrointestinal events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention and dual antiplatelet therapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of composite short-term and long-term major adverse upper gastrointestinal (UGI) events (MAUGIEs; defined as gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastroduodenal ulcer, or UGI bleeding) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and routinely received dual-antiplatelet therapy. From May 2002 to September 2010, a total of 1,368 consecutive patients who experienced ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled in the study. The incidence of in-hospital UGI bleeding complications and composite MAUGIEs was 8.9% and 9.9%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with in-hospital MAUGIEs than in those without (p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age, advanced Killip score (≥3), and respiratory failure were the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital composite MAUGIEs (all p <0.003). The cumulative composite of MAUGIEs after uneventful discharge in patients without adverse UGI events who continuously received dual-antiplatelet therapy for 3 to 12 months, followed by aspirin therapy, was 10.4% during long-term (mean 4.0 years) follow-up. In conclusion, the results of this study show a remarkably high incidence of composite short-term and long-term MAUGIEs in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and received routine dual-antiplatelet therapy. Age, advanced Killip score, and respiratory failure were significantly and independently predictive of in-hospital composite MAUGIEs.     

Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention

Elevated uric acid (UA) levels have been associated with cardiovascular disease in epidemiologic studies. The relation between UA levels and long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not known. Data from 2,249 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups with high or low UA using upper limits of normal of 6 mg/dl for women and 7 mg/dl for men. There were 1,643 patients in the low-UA group (mean age 55.9 ± 11.6 years, 85% men) and 606 patients in the high-UA group (mean age 60.5 ± 12.6 years, 76% men). Serum UA levels were 8.0 ± 1.5 mg/dl in the high-UA group and 5.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl in the low-UA group (p <0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with high UA levels (9% vs 2%, p <0.001), as was the rate of adverse outcomes in patients with high UA. The mean follow-up time was 24.3 months. Cardiovascular mortality, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, heart failure, and major adverse cardiac events were all significantly higher in the high-UA group. In a multivariate analyses, high plasma UA levels were an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events in the hospital (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 3.75, p = 0.006) and during long-term follow-up (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.56, p = 0.03). In conclusion, high UA levels on admission are independently associated with in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Comparison of rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting versus direct stenting alone in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

This randomized trial compared rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting with direct infarct artery stenting alone in 100 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The primary end point of the study was early ST-segment elevation resolution, and the secondary end points were corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count, infarct size, and 1-month clinical outcome. The primary end point rates were 90% in the thrombectomy group and 72% in the placebo group (p = 0.022). Randomization to thrombectomy was independently related to the primary end point (odds ratio 3.56, p = 0.032). The corrected Thrombolysis In Myocaridal Infarctions (TIMI) frame count was lower in the thrombectomy group (18.2 +/- 7.7 vs 22.5 +/- 11.0, p = 0.032), and infarct size was smaller in the thrombectomy group (13.0 +/- 11.6% vs 21.2 +/- 18.0%, p = 0.010). At 1 month, there were no major adverse cardiac events. Rheolytic thrombectomy before routine direct infarct-related artery (IRA) stenting is highly feasible and provides more effective myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI.     

Comparison of 600 versus 300-mg Clopidogrel loading dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty

The aim of the present study was to compare 600- and 300-mg clopidogrel loading doses in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Two hundred fifty-five consecutive patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions who underwent primary PCI were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of the loading dose of clopidogrel received before the procedure (600 vs 300 mg). Procedural angiographic end points and 1-year major adverse cardiac events were compared between the 2 groups. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical and angiographic features between the 2 groups: 157 (62%) in the clopidogrel 600 mg group and 98 (38%) in the 300 mg group. Patients receiving 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel showed a significantly lower incidence of post-PCI myocardial blush grade 0 or 1 (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.96, p = 0.03) and significantly less common no-reflow phenomenon (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.98, p = 0.04) compared to those in the 300-mg group. Propensity-adjusted Cox analysis showed significantly higher survival free of major adverse cardiac events in patients receiving 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel compared to those receiving the lower dose (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.98, p = 0.04). In conclusion, a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel is associated with improvements in procedural angiographic end points and 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary PCI compared to a 300-mg dose.     

Adjunct thrombus aspiration reduces mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction with high-risk angiographic characteristics

Routine aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not proved effective in randomized trials. However, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with severely reduced flow or visible thrombus, AT remains an intuitively attractive option. The use of adjunctive AT in a high-risk cohort of 158 consecutive patients with STEMI and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 0 to 1 flow or visible thrombus on baseline angiography was examined. Of these, 80 patients underwent AT as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and 78 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention without AT (non-AT). TIMI 3 flow rates, residual thrombus after percutaneous coronary intervention, and major adverse cardiac events (mortality and nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction) at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year were compared. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The AT group more frequently achieved TIMI 3 flow after the intervention (91.3% AT vs 67.9% non-AT; p <0.001) and had less residual thrombus (7.5% AT vs 19.2% non-AT; p = 0.03). AT was associated with reduced major adverse cardiac events at 6 months (6.8% AT vs 24.0% non-AT; p = 0.004) and 1 year (16.6% AT vs 29.2% non-AT; p = 0.009), and decreased mortality rates in the AT group at 6 months (5.4% AT vs 21.3% non-AT; p = 0.004) and 1 year (7.7% AT vs 26.2% non-AT; p = 0.005). In conclusion, for patients with STEMI and TIMI 0 or 1 flow or visible thrombus on baseline angiography, AT was associated with increased TIMI 3 flow rates, decreased residual thrombus, and decreased clinical events, including mortality.     

Comparison of long-term (seven year) outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization with versus without stenting

Coronary stents have markedly improved the short- and intermediate-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention by improving acute gains in luminal dimensions, decreasing abrupt vessel occlusion, and decreasing restenosis, yet the long-term benefit of coronary stenting remains uncertain. We examined long-term clinical outcomes of death, myocardial infarction, and repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR) among patients enrolled in the Duke Database for Cardiovascular Disease who underwent revascularization with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty alone or stent placement from 1990 to 2002. Among 6,956 patients who underwent percutaneous revascularization, propensity modeling was applied to identify 1,288 matched patients with a similar likelihood to receive coronary stents according to clinical, angiographic, and demographic characteristics. Significant (p <0.05) predictors of stent placement included multivessel disease, diabetes, hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, decreased ejection fraction, and year of study entry. At a median follow-up of 7 years, although treatment with coronary stenting was associated with a significant and sustained decrease in repeat TVR (18.0% vs 28.1%, p = 0.0002) and the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction or TVR (39.2% vs 45.8%, p = 0.004), long-term survival did not significantly differ between treatment groups (19.9% vs 20.5%, p = 0.72). Outcomes of death and myocardial infarction did not significantly differ between patients who did and did not undergo repeat TVR. In conclusion, compared with angioplasty alone, revascularization with coronary stents provides a significant early and sustained decrease in the need for repeat revascularization, but stents do not influence long-term survival.     

Usefulness of adiponectin as a predictor of all cause mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Substantial evidence points to a protective role of adiponectin against atherosclerosis and cardiovascular (CV) disease. However, in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the role of adiponectin has not previously been studied. Consequently, the aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of adiponectin after AMI in a large population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 735 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admitted to a single high-volume invasive heart center and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from September 2006 to December 2008 were included. Blood samples were drawn immediately before the invasive procedure. Plasma adiponectin was measured using a validated immunoassay. End points were all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and admission for new AMI or heart failure. The median follow-up time was 27 months (interquartile range 22 to 33). Patients with high adiponectin (quartile 4) had increased mortality compared to patients with low adiponectin (quartiles 1 to 3) (log-rank p <0.001). After adjustment for conventional risk factors (age, gender, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, body mass index, C-reactive protein, peak troponin I, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, previous AMI, multivessel disease, complex lesions, left anterior descending coronary artery lesion, and symptom-to-balloon time) by Cox regression analysis, high adiponectin remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.2, p = 0.001) and CV mortality (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 4.5, p = 0.001). In conclusion, increased plasma adiponectin independently predicts all-cause and CV mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Comparison of myocardial perfusion after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with versus without diabetes mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have an adverse prognosis after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether DM was associated with impaired myocardial reperfusion after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI was investigated. Myocardial reperfusion was assessed by ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush grade (MBG). A total of 386 patients were studied, of whom 64 (17%) had DM. These patients more frequently had reduced MBG (20% vs 10%, p = 0.02) and incomplete ST-segment resolution (55% vs 35%, p = 0.02) compared with patients without DM. After multivariate analysis, DM was still associated with impaired ST resolution (odds ratio 2.1, p = 0.03) and reduced MBG (odds ratio 2.2, p = 0.03).     

Persistent ST-segment elevation after primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction: its relation to left ventricular recovery

BACKGROUND: Early restoration of coronary artery patency in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been linked to improvement in survival. However, early recanalization of an occluded epicardial coronary artery by either thrombolytic agents or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) does not necessarily lead to left ventricular (LV) function recovery. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between persistent ST elevation shortly after primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and LV recovery. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with primary stenting for AMI were prospectively enrolled. To evaluate the extent of microvascular injury, serial ST-segment analysis on a 12-lead electrocardiogram recording just before and at the end of the coronary intervention was performed. Persistent ST-segment elevation (Persistent Group, n = 11) was defined as > or = 50% of peak ST elevation and resolution (Resolution Group, n = 20) was defined as < 50% of peak ST elevation. Echocardiography was performed on Day 1 and 3 months after primary stenting. RESULTS: At 3 months, infarct zone wall-motion score index (WMSI, 2.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.3, p < 0.05) was smaller in the Resolution Group than in the Persistent Group, whereas wall motion recovery index (RI, 0.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 0.1 +/- 0.2, p < 0.05) and ejection fraction (58 +/- 5 vs. 43 +/- 10%, p < 0.05) were larger in the Resolution Group than in the Persistent Group. The extent of persistent ST elevation (% ST) shortly after successful recanalization of the infarct-related artery was significantly related to RI at 3 months (r = -0.4, p < 0.05). However, time to reperfusion was not related to RI at 3 months. There was also significant correlation between corrected TIMI frame count and %ST (r = 0.4, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent ST-segment elevation shortly after successful recanalization (> or = 50% of the peak value), as a marker of impaired microvascular reperfusion, predicts poor LV recovery 3 months after primary stenting for AMI.     

Comparison of late (3-year) registry data outcomes using bare metal versus drug-eluting stents for treating ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarctions

Clinical trial data have supported the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs), but contemporary "real-world" registry data regarding the late safety profiles of DES are limited. This prospective registry-based study included 1,569 consecutive unselected patients with STEMIs who underwent emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2001 to December 2009. Of the study cohort, 200 patients (12.7%) received DES, while 1,369 patients (87.3%) underwent bare-metal stent (BMS) placement. The primary end points of the study were all-cause mortality and target vessel revascularization at 1, 2, and 3 years. Survival status was assessed by municipal civil registries. Repeat revascularization procedures were prospectively collected in the hospital database. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DES group at 3 years (4.2% vs 13.5%, p = 0.007) compared to BMS-treated patients, but DES use was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 1.2, p = 0.10). Target vessel revascularization was significantly lower in the DES group compared to the BMS group at 3 years (10.5% vs 21%, p = 0.001). DES use was an independent predictor of reduced target vessel revascularization (adjusted odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.77, p = 0.004). Late definite stent thrombosis occurring after 1 year occurred in 4 (2.5%) patients in the DES group compared to 6 (0.7%) in the BMS group (p = 0.05). DES use was an independent predictor of late stent thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio 8.6, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 38, p = 0.004). In conclusion, this contemporary registry-based study of patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI demonstrated improved revascularization rates without increased 3-year hazard of adverse clinical outcomes in DES-treated patients.